Next Article in Journal
Combinatorial Effects of miRNAs in HSV-2 Infection of Macrophages: An In Silico and In Vitro Integration Approach
Previous Article in Journal
CD4+ T Cell Responses to Toxoplasma gondii Are a Double-Edged Sword
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Vaccines
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/vaccines11091487
vaccines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Serological Conversion through a Second Exposure to Inactivated Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Expressing the JC Epitope on the Viral Surface

by
Seong Yun Hwang
1,2,
Sung Ho Shin
1,
Sung-Han Park
1,
Min Ja Lee
1,
Su-Mi Kim
1,
Jong-Soo Lee
2 and
Jong-Hyeon Park
1,*
1
Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, 177 Hyeoksin 8-ro, Gimcheon 39660, Republic of Korea
2
College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34314, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2023, 11(9), 1487; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11091487
Submission received: 27 July 2023 / Revised: 12 September 2023 / Accepted: 13 September 2023 / Published: 14 September 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a fatal contagious viral disease that affects cloven-hoofed animals and causes severe economic damage at the national level. There are seven serotypes of the causative foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), and type O is responsible for serious outbreaks and shows a high incidence. Recently, the Cathay, Southeast Asia (SEA), and ME-SA (Middle East-South Asia) topotypes of type O have been found to frequently occur in Asia. Thus, it is necessary to develop candidate vaccines that afford protection against these three different topotypes. In this study, an experimental FMD vaccine was produced using a recombinant virus (TWN-JC) with the JC epitope (VP1 140–160 sequence of the O/SKR/Jincheon/2014) between amino acid 152 and 153 of VP1 in TWN-R. Immunization with this novel vaccine candidate was found to effectively protect mice against challenge with the three different topotype viruses. Neutralizing antibody titers were considerably higher after a second vaccination. The serological differences between the topotype strains were identified in guinea pigs and swine. In conclusion, a significant serological difference was observed at 56 days post-vaccination between animals that received the TWN-JC vaccine candidate and those that received the positive control virus (TWN-R). The TWN-JC vaccine candidate induced IFNγ and IL-12B.

1. Introduction

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is an important animal disease that is highly contagious in cloven-hoofed animals, such as cattle, pigs, and goats, and can threaten a nation’s livestock industry [1,2]. The foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is an RNA virus from the Aphthovirus genus belonging to the Picornaviridae family [3]. Since the FMDV is a single-stranded positive-sense RNA virus, it is highly mutated. The FMDV has seven serotypes and many topotypes, some of which can result in particularly serious economic losses [4]. Thus, FMD is one of the infectious animal diseases under the management of the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) [5].
Outbreaks of FMD in Taiwan in 1997 (due to a swine-derived virus), the United Kingdom in 2001, and the Republic of Korea in 2014 caused serious economic damage [6,7,8]. To minimize and prevent the damage caused by FMD, vaccination has been implemented in many countries where FMDV is currently found, including the Republic of Korea [9]. In addition, vaccination plays an important role in prevention strategies for FMD-free countries at a high risk of epidemic outbreaks [10].
There are five commonly known neutralizing antigenic sites on the FMDV: site 1 consists of amino acids (aa) 140–160 and 208 of VP1 (GH loop), site 2 consists of aa 70–77 (B–C loop) and aa 131–134 (E–F loop) of VP2, site 3 consists of aa 42–51 (B–C loop) of VP1, site 4 consists of aa 56–58 of VP3, and site 5 consists of aa 149 of VP1 [11,12]. To develop an innovative vaccine, we focused on site 1 (GH loop of VP1), a known linear B-cell epitope [13]. We selected site 1 because its immunogenic epitope can be modified without disrupting the icosahedral shape of the FMDV; it is even possible to insert an amino acid sequence that protrudes from the surface of the viral capsid in a linear manner [14]. Functionally, the antigenic site 1 induces a protective immunity [15,16,17].
In terms of detecting the host response to novel candidate vaccines, mouse FMD challenge models are used to rapidly and accurately confirm the ability of novel viruses and antigens to activate host defense mechanisms [18,19]. In addition, guinea pigs are used in serological analyses as an immunological experimental model for FMD [20,21].
We previously found in studies with recombinant vaccine strains that the P1 region was replaced by O/Taiwan/97 strain in the O1maisa backbone [22]. Although the TWN-R strain was effective as a vaccine strain, we tried to develop a vaccine strain matching more diverse topotypes than TWN-R by inserting the VP1 140–160 epitope of the O/SKR/Jincheon/2014 (JC) strain between amino acids 152 and 153 of VP1 in TWN-R. Here, the effect of adding the VP1 140–160 epitope of the JC strain was examined by comparing the immunogenicity of the TWN-JC recombinant virus with that of the positive control virus (TWN-R), which contained only P1 of the O/Taiwan/97 (TWN) strain.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plasmid Preparation for Infectious Clones

The recombinant FMDV was prepared by inserting the VP1 140–160 amino acid sequence (the linear B-cell epitope) of the JC (O/SKR/JC/2014, GenBank No. KX162590.1) strain of SEA topotype into the previously studied TWN-R strain of the Cathay topotype [22]. The following oligonucleotide primers were used to insert the epitope into the TWN P1 gene: JC_epitope_F 5′-GCTGGCACCGAAAGCGGCGAGGCCATTGCCCCAGAAGGCAGAAAGAACTC-3′ and JC_epitope_R 5′-ACTTGGAGATCGCCTCTCACGTTGGGCAGTGAAGCTAACACTTGAAGGTC-3′. The 3B region was mutated as a differentiating infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA) marker in the recombinant virus [23]. Mutations in the 3B region replaced 3B1B2 with a double repeat of 3B3 in the viral genome to develop a vaccine strain.

2.2. Cell Culture and Recovery of Viral Particles

BHK-T7-9 cells [24] (cells expressing T7 RNA polymerase) were maintained in Glasgow Minimum Essential Medium (Gibco BRL, Paisley, UK) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (Gibco BRL, Paisley, UK) and 10% tryptose phosphate broth (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). ZZ-R 127 cells (Fetal goat tongue cell line) were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium/F12 (Corning, Union City, NJ, USA).
Recombinant viruses were recovered using the procedures described in a previous study [25], and the prepared plasmid was transfected with the linearized plasmids using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to generate the chimeric viruses in the BHK-T7-9 cells. After being transfected and incubated for 48–72 h at 37 °C, the recombinant virus was harvested via three freeze–thaw cycles, and the harvested virus was used to infect fresh ZZ-R 127 cells. All the experiments involving the FMDV or virus-infected animals were conducted in a biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) facility at the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA).

2.3. Measurement of Viral Growth

Each type of virus was cultivated in each of the three cell types (ZZ-R 127; goat tongue cell line, LFBK; porcine kidney cell line, and BHK-21; baby hamster kidney cell line), and a viral growth curve was generated for each case. Cell monolayers in 12-well plates were infected with the TWN-R or TWN-JC virus at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01 or 0.001 and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2. After 1 h, the supernatant was replaced with fresh medium. RNA purification was performed by harvesting the supernatant at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 h post infection (hpi). A One-step Prime-script RT-PCR kit (Bioneer Inc., Daejeon, Republic of Korea) and a CFX96 Touch Real-time PCR Detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) were used to generate the RNA-based data that were utilized to produce the viral growth curves. The experiments were repeated at least three times.

2.4. Purification for Viral Capsid Protein

The inactivated FMDV antigens were purified as described in a previous study, with some modifications. Briefly, suspended BHK-21 cells were maintained in CD BHK-21 Production Medium (Gibco BRL, Paisley, UK) in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The virus grown in the suspended BHK-21 cells was harvested by freezing and thawing when a complete cytopathic effect was observed. The cell debris was removed after the inactivation of the virus using binary ethyleneimine (0.003 N) at 26 °C for 24 h. The inactivated virus in the clarified culture was subsequently precipitated by incubating it with 7.5% PEG 6000 and 2.3% NaCl overnight at 4 °C, and the pellet was resuspended in Tris-KCl buffer to a final concentration of 200 times. The resuspended pellet was subsequently purified via centrifugation through a 15–45% sucrose gradient in Tris-KCl buffer at 30,000 rpm for 4 h at 4 °C using an SW41 rotor. The content of the pellet was determined via a spectrophotometric analysis at 259 nm. The inactivated antigens of the recombinant virus were identified using the FMDV Ag-lateral flow assay kit (Princeton Bio Meditech Corporation, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA). The purified antigens were separately adsorbed onto carbon-coated copper grids and visualized under a transmission electron microscope (Hitachi H7100FA, Tokyo, Japan).

2.5. Vaccination and FMDV Challenge in C57BL/6 Mice

The candidate vaccine consisted of the antigen and adjuvant (ISA 206; 50%, Al(OH)3; 10%, saponin; 1%). Mice were vaccinated via an intramuscular injection, and the mice in the experimental group received 1/10 (1.5 μg), 1/40 (0.375 μg), 1/160 (0.0937 μg), or 1/640 (0.0234 μg) of 15 μg (pigs were vaccinated with a 15 μg/dose). Seven days after vaccination, the mice were challenged with a virus (administered via an intraperitoneal injection), and their survival rates and body weights were observed for a further seven days. Seven-week-old C57BL/6 female mice (n = 5; Orient Co. Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea) were vaccinated and then challenged with the ME-SA topotype (O/Vietnam/2013; VIT) at a dose of 3 × 104 TCID50/0.1 mL. To induce a lethal condition, IFNαR K/O mice (n = 3 or 4; Watson RnD, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) were vaccinated and then challenged with the SEA (O/SKR/Jincheon/2014; JC) or Cathay (O/Taiwan/97; TWN) topotype at a dose of 1 × 105 TCID50/0.1 mL. All the animals were kept at the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA) and were used with the approval of the Animal Care and Use Committee.

2.6. Determination of Immune Responses via ELISA, VNT, and Calculation of Serological Relationships in Guinea Pigs and Swine

Female guinea pigs (n = 5; 250 g) were vaccinated intramuscularly with a 7.5 μg/dose of antigen mixed with an ISA 206, saponin, and aluminum hydroxide gel adjuvant. They received a booster dose at 21 dpv. Blood was drawn at 0, 14, 28, and 42 dpv. Eight- to ten-week-old pigs (n = 5) were vaccinated with a 15 μg/dose of antigen mixed with an ISA 206, saponin, and aluminum hydroxide gel adjuvant. Pig serum was collected at 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, and 56 dpv. The pigs received a booster dose at 28 dpv. Serum antibodies specific to the FMDV structural proteins (SP) were detected via ELISA using PrioCheck FMDV O (Prionics AG, Schlieren-Zurich, Switzerland). When a sample returned a percent inhibition value of > 50%, the respective animal was regarded as having demonstrated an immune response.
The serum samples were heat-inactivated at 56 °C for 30 min. The cell density was adjusted to form a 70% monolayer, and two-fold serial dilutions of the serum samples were prepared. The diluted serum samples were then incubated with 100 TCID50 of the FMDV (including O/SKR/Boeun/2017; BE) for 1 h at 37 °C. After 1 h, an LFBK (porcine kidney) cell suspension was added to the wells of 96-well plates. After two to three days, the extent of the cytopathic effect (CPE) in each well was recorded to determine the neutralization titer, which was calculated as log10 of the reciprocal antibody dilution required to neutralize 100 TCID50 of the virus.

2.7. 3D Structural Model Analysis

The crystal structure of the O PanAsia strain (PDB accession no. 5NE4) was used as a template for modeling the capsid protein (protomeric subunit) of the candidate vaccine strains, TWN-R and TWN-JC, using SWISS-MODEL. The localization of the inserted epitope region in the protomeric subunits and an epitope analysis were performed using the Pymol molecular graphics system (Version 2.3.4, Schrodinger LLC, New York, NY, USA).

2.8. Cytokine ELISA

The ELISAs used to detect the porcine IFNγ, IL-2, IL-12B (Cloud-Clone Corporation, Houston, TX, USA), IL-7, and IL-15 (Wuhan Fine Biotech Co., Wuhan, China) in the serum were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.9. Statistical Analyses

Data are presented as means ± standard deviations (SD) and represent the results from at least three independent experiments. Differences between the groups were determined by performing an analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the means were compared using the Student’s t test. p values of * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 were regarded as significant or highly significant.

2.10. Ethics Statement

The animal experiments were performed in strict accordance with the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA)’s guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. All the procedures that involved animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the APQA of South Korea (approval no. 2022-694). All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Candidate Vaccine Strains and Viral Capsid Purification

TWN-R contains the TWN strain’s P1 sequence in the O1manisa backbone, and TWN-JC was constructed by inserting amino acid 140–160 from VP1 of O/SKR/JC/2014 (JC) between amino acid 152 and 153 of VP1 in TWN-R (Figure 1). It was predicted that the three-dimensional structure changed due to the addition of the JC epitope (linear B-cell epitope of O/SKR/JC/2014; VP1 140-160 amino acid). As a result of comparing the prediction models of TWN-JC and TWN-R, it was found that the outwardly protruding linear epitope of VP1 was changed (Figure S1). Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images showed no difference in the viral particle shapes and sizes between TWN-R and TWN-JC. It was confirmed that the inserted JC epitope sequence was maintained in the fourth suspension’s cell passage (Figure S1). To confirm whether there was a difference in the virus growth, the TWN-R and TWN-JC viruses were, respectively, infected with ZZ-R 127, LFBK, and BHK21 cells, and the virus replication was measured over time. There was no significant difference observed in the viral replication between the two virus strains (Figure 1 and Figure S2). Comparing the morphology of the virus in the TEM images and the viral replication, TWN-R and TWN-JC were similar. Therefore, it is considered that there was no problem with the virus stability due to the addition of the JC epitope.

3.2. Determination of the Protective Value of the Experimental Vaccine in Mice

To determine whether the addition of the JC strain’s epitope enhanced the immunogenicity of TWN-JC in comparison to TWN-R (positive control), the vaccinated mice were challenged with each virus topotype (Figure 2). When the mice were infected with the foot-and-mouth disease virus, there were mild symptoms such as slowed movement, loss of appetite, weight loss, and, in severe cases, death. In the O/SKR/JC/2014 and O/TWN/97 challenge group, IFNαR knock-out mice were used to clearly observe the differences in immunogenicity between the TWN-R and TWN-JC group. A survival rate of 0% was confirmed in the non-vaccinated group (negative control), while the survival rate was confirmed in proportion to the antigen concentration in the vaccinated group. A challenge with O/SKR/JC/2014 (SEA; Mya-98 lineage) or O/VIT/2013 (ME-SA; Pan-Asia lineage) showed that the vaccination with TWN-JC produced a significantly higher protection than that with TWN-R, indicating that TWN-JC has a high protective capability.
The mice vaccinated with TWN-JC and challenged with O/TWN/97 (Cathay topotype) were found to have the same survival rate at seven days post-challenge (dpc) as the mice vaccinated with TWN-R and challenged with the Cathay topotype. However, the mice vaccinated with a 1/40 dose (porcine vaccine dose) of TWN-R showed weight loss, whereas those vaccinated with TWN-JC showed no weight loss (Figure S3).

3.3. Immunogenicity of the Candidate Vaccine in Guinea Pigs

To determine the effect of the included epitope from the JC strain on the immunogenicity of the candidate vaccine, the serological difference between the animals vaccinated with TWN-R and TWN-JC was determined in the guinea pigs (Figure 3). After the first vaccination with either TWN-R or TWN-JC, blood was collected every two weeks and boosting was performed at 21 dpv. The ELISA and VNT results showed that the vaccination with TWN-R induced slightly higher antibody levels at 14 dpv than the vaccination with TWN-JC; however, this situation was reversed after boosting. Serum samples from the animals vaccinated with TWN-R were found to have higher levels of neutralizing antibodies against the Cathay topotype than those from the animals vaccinated with TWN-JC, due to the high homology in the viral structures. However, the serum samples from the animals vaccinated with TWN-JC were found to have higher levels of neutralizing antibodies against O/SKR/JC/2014 (SEA; Mya-98 lineage), O/VIT/2013 (ME-SA; Pan-Asia lineage), and O/SKR/BE/2017 (ME-SA; Ind2001 lineage) than those from the animals vaccinated with TWN-R.

3.4. Evaluation of Neutralizing Antibodies Generated in Vaccinated Pigs

After confirming the effect of the JC epitope on the immunogenicity of the candidate vaccine in the guinea pigs, the immunogenic effect of the JC epitope was determined in five pigs, where pig was the target animal. Boosting was performed 28 days after the first vaccination, and ELISAs and VNTs were used to measure the resultant antiviral antibody levels (Figure 4). The results were similar to those found with the vaccinated guinea pigs.
Priming and boosting the pigs with TWN-R induced more neutralizing antibodies effective against the Cathay topotype than priming and boosting them with TWN-JC. However, higher anti-SEA and anti-ME-SA neutralizing antibody levels were generated by priming and boosting with TWN-JC in comparison to that with TWN-R. A serological analysis performed using guinea pigs and porcine serum samples showed that TWN-R demonstrated a higher correlation than TWN-JC, and that TWN-JC demonstrated a higher correlation with O/SKR/JC/2014, O/VIT/2013, and O/SKR/BE/2017.
To confirm the broad immunogenicity of TWN-JC compared to TWN-R, we analyzed VN titers before and after boosting. Before boosting, it was found that TWN-R and TWN-JC had a similar serum neutralizing antibody level. After boosting with TWN-JC, the neutralizing antibodies against the SEA and ME-SA topotype viruses significantly increased compared to those with TWN-R (Figure 5).

3.5. Effects of the JC Epitope on Cytokine Secretion

Cytokines were also detected via ELISA to confirm whether the addition of the JC epitope affected the cytokine secretion (Figure 6). Cytokine secretion was observed using the 0 dpv (pre-vaccination), 7 dpv, 28 dpv (before boosting), and 56 dpv (after boosting) serum of the immunized pigs. All the cytokine levels in both TWN-R and TWN-JC increased initially after vaccination and then tended to decrease over time by being normalized with pre-vaccination serum. The animals vaccinated with TWN-JC demonstrated higher IFNγ and IL-12B levels than those vaccinated with TWN-R at 7 dpv. The levels of IFNγ and IL-12B showed an approximate two-fold difference, but these results were not statistically significant. The IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 levels also increased at 7 dpv, but there was no significant difference between TWN-R and TWN-JC.

4. Discussion

The recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has increased the interest in single-stranded RNA viruses and reinforced the fact that effective vaccines are required to prevent infectious viral diseases [26]. Most FMDV strains currently used in vaccines have limitations; for example, they tend to elicit short-lived antibodies in pigs or only induce humoral immunity [27]. To develop vaccine strains with excellent protective effects, two main paths are followed: the generation of attenuated viruses with a reduced pathogenicity and the production of epitope-based vaccines [28,29,30,31,32].
A considerable amount of research has been conducted to develop B- and T-cell epitope-based vaccines that protect against diseases mediated by RNA viruses [33,34,35], including FMD [36]. Here, we selected a universal B-cell epitope from the VP1 of the FMDV and designed a multi-epitope virus strain with the aim of increasing the number of neutralizing antibodies elicited that were effective against three different topotypes [37].
The results of this study suggest that the novel recombinant strain (TWN-JC) can be used as a vaccine strain because the surface structure of the virus particle is changed, but the replication of TWN-JC was not significantly different compared to TWN-R (Figure 1 and Figure S2). Furthermore, the immunogenicity of the recombinant virus in mice was improved by the addition of the linear B-cell epitope from the JC strain; the mice that received the TWN-JC candidate vaccine generated more anti-viral antibodies that were effective against the SEA and ME-SA topotypes than the mice that received TWN-R. When assessed against the Cathay topotype, TWN-R and TWN-JC were found to produce the same survival rate; however, the mice that received TWN-JC showed less weight change than those that received TWN-R (Figure 2 and Figure S3). In both the TWN-R and TWN-JC groups, the survival rate was higher in the O/VIT/2013 (ME-SA; Pan-Asia lineage) challenge group than in the O/TWN/97 or O/SKR/JC/2014 group. The reason for this is that the Pan-Asia lineage strain among ME-SA is thought to be antigenically highly reactive to most type O viruses [38].
Compared to TWN-R, TWN-JC was also found to induce greater protection in the mice against the SEA and ME-SA topotypes and a potent immune response in the guinea pigs that was effective against the SEA and ME-SA topotypes. It was noted that the immune response induced by TWN-JC was relatively less effective against the Cathay topotype than that induced by TWN-R. This was because the viral capsid structure in TWN-JC was changed due to the addition of the JC epitope (Figure 3 and Figure S1).
A serological analysis performed using pig serum returned similar results to those observed in the experiments with the guinea pigs. Prior to receiving a booster dose, the animals vaccinated with TWN-JC showed relatively low neutralizing antibody levels compared to those vaccinated with TWN-R. However, after boosting, they were found to have relatively high titers. The vaccine matching was analyzed using porcine serum and each topotype. At 28 dpv, TWN-R and TWN-JC observed similar neutralizing antibody levels for the three topotypes, but at 56 dpv, TWN-R showed a high VN titer only with the Cathay topotype, whereas TWN-JC confirmed a high VN titer with the three topotypes (Figure 4 and Figure 5).
Our findings indicate that adding the linear B-cell epitope from the JC strain to the GH loop region of VP1 resulted in the induction of high neutralizing antibody levels up to 56 dpv that could neutralize a range of viruses [31]. The addition of the epitope appeared to have a positive effect on the production of neutralizing antibodies, inducing a gradual rise in their quantity and an enhanced immune response against the tested viruses. A similar phenomenon (i.e., the induction of long-lasting antibodies) was reported in a previous comparative study conducted with chimeric viruses [27,38].
To identify the reason that TWN-JC induced such a robust immune response after boosting, cytokine secretion was measured (Figure 6). Given that the IFNγ and IL-12B secretion was increased in the animals that received TWN-JC compared to the animals that received TWN-R, it is reasonable to conclude that the presence of the JC epitope stimulated the IL-12 and IFNγ levels [39]. IFNγ modulates the immune response to viral infection and affects memory T cells [27,40,41,42,43,44]. Furthermore, IFNγ is known to be involved in the host defense response in pigs, and cellular immunity is induced by IFNγ and IL-12, which mediate protection against the FMDV [45,46].

5. Conclusions

Despite the insertion of the JC epitope, the virus was stably formed, and it was confirmed that immunogenicity against the three topotypes (Cathay, SEA, and ME-SA topotype) was equally improved in the mice, guinea pigs, and swine depending on the presence or absence of the JC epitope. As the JC epitope was additionally inserted into antigenic site 1, the vaccine matching rate for the three topotypes increased. It is considered that serological conversion occurred after the animals received a booster dose and that memory-related immunity was enhanced by the addition of the JC epitope.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vaccines11091487/s1, Figure S1: Aligned VP1 sequence and modeling of the capsid protomer structure of TWN-R and TWN-JC; Figure S2: Comparison of viral replication between TWN-R and TWN-JC in vitro; Figure S3: Differences in body weight change in mice between TWN-R 1/40 dose group and TWN-JC 1/40 dose group.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Y.H. and J.-H.P.; methodology, S.Y.H., S.H.S. and J.-H.P.; software, S.Y.H. and J.-H.P.; validation, S.Y.H. and J.-H.P.; formal analysis, S.Y.H. and J.-H.P.; investigation, S.Y.H., S.H.S. and J.-H.P.; resources, S.-H.P., M.J.L., S.-M.K., J.-S.L. and J.-H.P.; data curation, S.Y.H. and J.-H.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.Y.H. and J.-H.P.; writing—review and editing, S.Y.H., J.-S.L. and J.-H.P.; visualization, S.Y.H. and J.-H.P.; supervision, J.-H.P.; project administration, J.-H.P.; funding acquisition, J.-H.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA) (B-1543386).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal experiments were performed according to institutional guidelines, with approval from the Ethics Committee of the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (accreditation number: IACUC-2022-694).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article.

Acknowledgments

This project was conducted with the support of the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency of Korea. We would like to thank the staff of the Center for Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccine Research for managing the FMD BSL-3 and ABSL-3 facilities, and we would like to express our special gratitude to Jung-Won Park and So hui Park for helping us with this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Knowles, N.J.; Samuel, A.R. Molecular epidemiology of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Virus Res. 2003, 91, 65–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, F.; Li, Y.; Ma, J.; Wu, R.; Zou, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Zhu, Y. Molecular evolution, diversity, and adaptation of foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype O in Asia. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1147652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Arzt, J.; Baxt, B.; Grubman, M.J.; Jackson, T.; Juleff, N.; Rhyan, J.; Rieder, E.; Waters, R.; Rodriguez, L.L. The pathogenesis of foot-and-mouth disease II: Viral pathways in swine, small ruminants, and wildlife; myotropism, chronic syndromes, and molecular virus-host interactions. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2011, 58, 305–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jamal, S.M.; Khan, S.; Knowles, N.J.; Wadsworth, J.; Hicks, H.M.; Mioulet, V.; Bin-Tarif, A.; Ludi, A.B.; Shah, S.A.A.; Abubakar, M.; et al. Foot-and-mouth disease viruses of the O/ME-SA/Ind-2001e sublineage in Pakistan. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2021, 68, 3126–3135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. OIE, W.J.W.O.A.H. OIE-Listed Diseases, Infections and Infestations in Force in 2018; World Organisation for Animal Health: Paris, France, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yang, F.; Zhu, Z.; Cao, W.; Liu, H.; Wei, T.; Zheng, M.; Zhang, K.; Jin, Y.; He, J.; Guo, J.; et al. Genetic determinants of altered virulence of type O foot-and-mouth disease virus. J. Virol. 2020, 94, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Knowles, N.J.; Samuel, A.R.; Davies, P.R.; Midgley, R.J.; Valarcher, J.F. Pandemic strain of foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype O. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 1887–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Park, J.H.; Tark, D.; Lee, K.N.; Chun, J.E.; Lee, H.S.; Ko, Y.J.; Kye, S.J.; Kim, Y.J.; Oem, J.K.; Ryoo, S.; et al. Control of type O foot-and-mouth disease by vaccination in Korea, 2014–2015. J. Vet.-Sci. 2018, 19, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ahn, Y.H.; Chathuranga, W.A.G.; Shim, Y.J.; Haluwana, D.K.; Kim, E.H.; Yoon, I.J.; Lim, Y.T.; Shin, S.H.; Jo, H.; Hwang, S.Y.; et al. The potential adjuvanticity of CAvant®SOE for foot-and-mouth disease vaccine. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Samuel, A.R.; Knowles, N.J. Foot-and-mouth disease virus: Cause of the recent crisis for the UK livestock industry. Trends Genet. 2001, 17, 421–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Harmsen, M.M.; Li, H.; Sun, S.; van der Poel, W.H.M.; Dekker, A. Mapping of foot-and-mouth disease virus antigenic sites recognized by single-domain antibodies reveals different 146S particle specific sites and particle flexibility. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 9, 1040802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Biswal, J.K.; Subramaniam, S.; Ranjan, R.; VanderWaal, K.; Sanyal, A.; Pattnaik, B.; Singh, R.K. Differential antibody responses to the major antigenic sites of FMD virus serotype O after primo-vaccination, multiply-vaccination and after natural exposure. Infect. Genet. Evol. J. Mol. Epidemiol. Evol. Genet. Infect. Dis. 2020, 78, 104105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. He, Y.; Li, K.; Cao, Y.; Sun, Z.; Li, P.; Bao, H.; Wang, S.; Zhu, G.; Bai, X.; Sun, P.; et al. Structures of foot-and-mouth disease virus with neutralizing antibodies derived from recovered natural host reveal a mechanism for cross-serotype neutralization. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mahapatra, M.; Hamblin, P.; Paton, D.J. Foot-and-mouth disease virus epitope dominance in the antibody response of vaccinated animals. J. Gen. Virol. 2012, 93, 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sarangi, L.N.; Mohapatra, J.K.; Subramaniam, S.; Sanyal, A.; Pattnaik, B. Antigenic site variation in foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype O grown under vaccinal serum antibodies in vitro. Virus Res. 2013, 176, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kitson, J.D.; Burke, K.L.; Pullen, L.A.; Belsham, G.J.; Almond, J.W. Chimeric polioviruses that include sequences derived from two independent antigenic sites of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) induce neutralizing antibodies against FMDV in guinea pigs. J. Virol. 1991, 65, 3068–3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, H.W.; Yang, C.Y.; Lee, M.C.; Chen, S.P.; Chang, H.W.; Cheng, I.C. The use of distinctive monoclonal antibodies in FMD VLP- and P1-based blocking ELISA for the seromonitoring of vaccinated swine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gnazzo, V.; Quattrocchi, V.; Soria, I.; Pereyra, E.; Langellotti, C.; Pedemonte, A.; Lopez, V.; Marangunich, L.; Zamorano, P. Mouse model as an efficacy test for foot-and-mouth disease vaccines. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 2507–2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Habiela, M.; Seago, J.; Perez-Martin, E.; Waters, R.; Windsor, M.; Salguero, F.J.; Wood, J.; Charleston, B.; Juleff, N. Laboratory animal models to study foot-and-mouth disease: A review with emphasis on natural and vaccine-induced immunity. J. Gen. Virol. 2014, 95, 2329–2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guo, H.C.; Sun, S.Q.; Jin, Y.; Yang, S.L.; Wei, Y.Q.; Sun, D.H.; Yin, S.H.; Ma, J.W.; Liu, Z.X.; Guo, J.H.; et al. Foot-and-mouth disease virus-like particles produced by a SUMO fusion protein system in Escherichia coli induce potent protective immune responses in guinea pigs, swine and cattle. Vet. Res. 2013, 44, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xie, Y.; Chang, H.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y. Adenovirus-vectored capsid proteins of the serotype a foot-and-mouth disease virus protect guinea pigs against challenge. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Choi, J.H.; Ko, M.K.; Shin, S.H.; You, S.H.; Jo, H.E.; Jo, H.; Lee, M.J.; Kim, S.M.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, B.; et al. Improved foot-and-mouth disease vaccine, O TWN-R, protects pigs against SEA topotype virus occurred in South Korea. Vet. Microbiol. 2019, 236, 108374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kamel, M.; El-Sayed, A.; Castañeda Vazquez, H. Foot-and-mouth disease vaccines: Recent updates and future perspectives. Arch. Virol. 2019, 164, 1501–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ito, N.; Takayama-Ito, M.; Yamada, K.; Hosokawa, J.; Sugiyama, M.; Minamoto, N. Improved recovery of rabies virus from cloned cDNA using a vaccinia virus-free reverse genetics system. Microbiol. Immunol. 2003, 47, 613–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lee, S.Y.; Lee, Y.J.; Kim, R.H.; Park, J.N.; Park, M.E.; Ko, M.K.; Choi, J.H.; Chu, J.Q.; Lee, K.N.; Kim, S.M.; et al. Rapid engineering of foot-and-mouth disease vaccine and challenge viruses. J. Virol. 2017, 91, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Naz, A.; Shahid, F.; Butt, T.T.; Awan, F.M.; Ali, A.; Malik, A. Designing multi-epitope vaccines to combat emerging coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by employing immuno-informatics approach. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jo, H.; Kim, B.Y.; Park, S.H.; Kim, H.M.; Shin, S.H.; Hwang, S.Y.; Kim, S.M.; Kim, B.; Park, J.H.; Lee, M.J. The HSP70-fused foot-and-mouth disease epitope elicits cellular and humoral immunity and drives broad-spectrum protective efficacy. NPJ Vaccines 2021, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Excler, J.-L.; Saville, M.; Berkley, S.; Kim, J.H. Vaccine development for emerging infectious diseases. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 591–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Welsh, R.M.; Fujinami, R.S. Pathogenic epitopes, heterologous immunity and vaccine design. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 5, 555–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bohórquez, J.A.; Defaus, S.; Muñoz-González, S.; Perez-Simó, M.; Rosell, R.; Fraile, L.; Sobrino, F.; Andreu, D.; Ganges, L. A bivalent dendrimeric peptide bearing a T-cell epitope from foot-and-mouth disease virus protein 3A improves humoral response against classical swine fever virus. Virus Res. 2017, 238, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cañas-Arranz, R.; Forner, M.; Defaus, S.; Rodríguez-Pulido, M.; de León, P.; Torres, E.; Bustos, M.J.; Borrego, B.; Sáiz, M.; Blanco, E.; et al. A bivalent B-cell epitope dendrimer peptide can confer long-lasting immunity in swine against foot-and-mouth disease. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 1614–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cañas-Arranz, R.; de León, P.; Forner, M.; Defaus, S.; Bustos, M.J.; Torres, E.; Andreu, D.; Blanco, E.; Sobrino, F. Immunogenicity of a dendrimer B2T peptide harboring a T-cell epitope from FMDV non-structural protein 3D. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kumar Pandey, R.; Ojha, R.; Mishra, A.; Kumar Prajapati, V. Designing B- and T-cell multi-epitope based subunit vaccine using immunoinformatics approach to control Zika virus infection. J. Cell Biochem. 2018, 119, 7631–7642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lim, H.X.; Lim, J.; Poh, C.L. Identification and selection of immunodominant B and T cell epitopes for dengue multi-epitope-based vaccine. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2021, 210, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Singh, J.; Malik, D.; Raina, A. Immuno-informatics approach for B-cell and T-cell epitope based peptide vaccine design against novel COVID-19 virus. Vaccine 2021, 39, 1087–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lei, Y.; Shao, J.; Zhao, F.; Li, Y.; Lei, C.; Ma, F.; Chang, H.; Zhang, Y. Artificially designed hepatitis B virus core particles composed of multiple epitopes of type A and O foot-and-mouth disease virus as a bivalent vaccine candidate. J. Med. Virol. 2019, 91, 2142–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, Q.; Wubshet, A.K.; Wang, Y.; Heath, L.; Zhang, J. B and T cell epitopes of the incursionary foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype SAT2 for vaccine development. Viruses 2023, 15, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hwang, S.Y.; Shin, S.H.; Kim, H.M.; Shin, S.; Lee, M.J.; Kim, S.M.; Lee, J.S.; Park, J.H. Evaluation of vaccine strains developed for efficient, broad-range protection against foot-and-mouth disease type O. Vaccines 2023, 11, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rosenzweig, S.D.; Holland, S.M. Defects in the interferon-gamma and interleukin-12 pathways. Immunol. Rev. 2005, 203, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ferrari, L.; Borghetti, P.; De Angelis, E.; Martelli, P. Memory T cell proliferative responses and IFN-γ productivity sustain long-lasting efficacy of a Cap-based PCV2 vaccine upon PCV2 natural infection and associated disease. Vet. Res. 2014, 45, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Chang, H.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J.; Chen, H. Comparative transcriptome analyses indicate enhanced cellular protection against FMDV in PK15 cells pretreated with IFN-γ. Gene 2016, 586, 206–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Soudja, S.M.; Chandrabos, C.; Yakob, E.; Veenstra, M.; Palliser, D.; Lauvau, G. Memory-T-cell-derived interferon-γ instructs potent innate cell activation for protective immunity. Immunity 2014, 40, 974–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. de León, P.; Cañas-Arranz, R.; Defaus, S.; Torres, E.; Forner, M.; Bustos, M.J.; Revilla, C.; Dominguez, J.; Andreu, D.; Blanco, E.; et al. Swine T-cells and specific antibodies evoked by peptide dendrimers displaying different FMDV T-cell epitopes. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 621537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Salerno-Gonçalves, R.; Sztein, M.B. Cell-mediated immunity and the challenges for vaccine development. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14, 536–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Carter, Q.L.; Curiel, R.E. Interleukin-12 (IL-12) ameliorates the effects of porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus (PRRSV) infection. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2005, 107, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Novelli, F.; Casanova, J.L. The role of IL-12, IL-23 and IFN-gamma in immunity to viruses. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2004, 15, 367–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vaccines 11 01487 g001
Figure 1. Characteristics of the TWN-R and TWN-JC. Schematic diagram of the TWN-R and TWN-JC genomes (A,B). TWN-JC is a novel vaccine candidate that has a JC epitope inserted into the TWN-R strain. TWN-R, which has the TWN P1 genome and O1manisa backbone, and TWN-JC, which has the VP1 140–160 linear B-cell epitope of the JC strain inserted into the VP1 GH loop region of TWN-R. Comparison of viral replication between TWN-R and TWN-JC in vitro. Three types of cells (ZZ-R 127, LFBK, and BHK-21) were infected at multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01, and virus growth was measured at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 h post-infection (C). Transmission electron microscope (TEM) imaging of TWN-R (D) and TWN-JC (E).
Figure 1. Characteristics of the TWN-R and TWN-JC. Schematic diagram of the TWN-R and TWN-JC genomes (A,B). TWN-JC is a novel vaccine candidate that has a JC epitope inserted into the TWN-R strain. TWN-R, which has the TWN P1 genome and O1manisa backbone, and TWN-JC, which has the VP1 140–160 linear B-cell epitope of the JC strain inserted into the VP1 GH loop region of TWN-R. Comparison of viral replication between TWN-R and TWN-JC in vitro. Three types of cells (ZZ-R 127, LFBK, and BHK-21) were infected at multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01, and virus growth was measured at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 h post-infection (C). Transmission electron microscope (TEM) imaging of TWN-R (D) and TWN-JC (E).
Vaccines 11 01487 g001
Vaccines 11 01487 g002
Figure 2. Protection against serotype O topotype viruses mediated by vaccination with TWN-R or TWN-JC in mice. Mice were vaccinated with TWN-R or TWN-JC at 1/10, 1/40, 1/160, or 1/640 of the dose used in pigs and challenged with three virus topotypes (ME-SA, SEA, and Cathay) at 7 dpv (A). The survival rate (B) and body weight (C) of the mice were measured for a further 7 days post-challenge.
Figure 2. Protection against serotype O topotype viruses mediated by vaccination with TWN-R or TWN-JC in mice. Mice were vaccinated with TWN-R or TWN-JC at 1/10, 1/40, 1/160, or 1/640 of the dose used in pigs and challenged with three virus topotypes (ME-SA, SEA, and Cathay) at 7 dpv (A). The survival rate (B) and body weight (C) of the mice were measured for a further 7 days post-challenge.
Vaccines 11 01487 g002
Vaccines 11 01487 g003
Figure 3. Immunogenicity of the recombinant virus in guinea pigs. Guinea pigs (n = 5) were vaccinated with 7.5 µg of inactivated antigen mixed with ISA 206, aluminum hydroxide gel adjuvant, and saponin. Sera were collected at 0, 14, 28, and 42 dpv, and the animals were boosted at 21 dpv. Schematic diagram of the experimental strategy (A), Structure Protein (SP) ELISA results generated using serum from guinea pigs vaccinated with TWN-R or TWN-JC (B), and the homologous (C) and heterologous neutralizing antibody titers against TWN (D), JC (E), VIT (F), and BE (G) in guinea pigs vaccinated with TWN-R or TWN-JC. A percent inhibition (PI) value > 50 was considered the cutoff for a positive reaction (blue dotted line). VN titers (log10) > 1.65 were regarded as positive (red dotted line). p values of p < 0.05 (*) and p < 0.01 (**).
Figure 3. Immunogenicity of the recombinant virus in guinea pigs. Guinea pigs (n = 5) were vaccinated with 7.5 µg of inactivated antigen mixed with ISA 206, aluminum hydroxide gel adjuvant, and saponin. Sera were collected at 0, 14, 28, and 42 dpv, and the animals were boosted at 21 dpv. Schematic diagram of the experimental strategy (A), Structure Protein (SP) ELISA results generated using serum from guinea pigs vaccinated with TWN-R or TWN-JC (B), and the homologous (C) and heterologous neutralizing antibody titers against TWN (D), JC (E), VIT (F), and BE (G) in guinea pigs vaccinated with TWN-R or TWN-JC. A percent inhibition (PI) value > 50 was considered the cutoff for a positive reaction (blue dotted line). VN titers (log10) > 1.65 were regarded as positive (red dotted line). p values of p < 0.05 (*) and p < 0.01 (**).
Vaccines 11 01487 g003
Vaccines 11 01487 g004
Figure 4. Immunogenicity of the recombinant virus in pigs. Pigs (n = 5) were vaccinated with 15 µg of inactivated antigen mixed with ISA 206, aluminum hydroxide gel adjuvant, and saponin. Sera were collected at 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, and 56 dpv, and the animals were boosted at 28 dpv. Schematic diagram of the experimental strategy (A), Structure protein (SP) ELISA results generated using serum from pigs vaccinated with TWN-R or TWN-JC (B), and the homologous (C) and heterologous neutralizing antibody titers against TWN (D), JC (E), VIT (F), and BE (G) in pigs vaccinated with TWN-R or TWN-JC. A PI value > 50 was considered the cutoff for a positive reaction (blue dotted line). VN titers (log10) > 1.65 were regarded as positive (red dotted line). p values of p < 0.05 (*).
Figure 4. Immunogenicity of the recombinant virus in pigs. Pigs (n = 5) were vaccinated with 15 µg of inactivated antigen mixed with ISA 206, aluminum hydroxide gel adjuvant, and saponin. Sera were collected at 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, and 56 dpv, and the animals were boosted at 28 dpv. Schematic diagram of the experimental strategy (A), Structure protein (SP) ELISA results generated using serum from pigs vaccinated with TWN-R or TWN-JC (B), and the homologous (C) and heterologous neutralizing antibody titers against TWN (D), JC (E), VIT (F), and BE (G) in pigs vaccinated with TWN-R or TWN-JC. A PI value > 50 was considered the cutoff for a positive reaction (blue dotted line). VN titers (log10) > 1.65 were regarded as positive (red dotted line). p values of p < 0.05 (*).
Vaccines 11 01487 g004
Vaccines 11 01487 g005
Figure 5. Comparison of specific serological changes associated with the different topotypes in guinea pigs (n = 5) and pigs (n = 5). The fold change associated with the different topotypes were compared using the prime (14 dpv) and boost (42 dpv) serum samples obtained from the guinea pigs (A,C,E,G) and the prime (28 dpv) and boost (56 dpv) serum samples obtained from the pigs (B,D,F,H). The fold change of the boost VN titer was normalized to prime VN titer. p values of p < 0.05 (*) and p < 0.01 (**).
Figure 5. Comparison of specific serological changes associated with the different topotypes in guinea pigs (n = 5) and pigs (n = 5). The fold change associated with the different topotypes were compared using the prime (14 dpv) and boost (42 dpv) serum samples obtained from the guinea pigs (A,C,E,G) and the prime (28 dpv) and boost (56 dpv) serum samples obtained from the pigs (B,D,F,H). The fold change of the boost VN titer was normalized to prime VN titer. p values of p < 0.05 (*) and p < 0.01 (**).
Vaccines 11 01487 g005
Vaccines 11 01487 g006
Figure 6. Cytokine secretion in pigs (n = 5) vaccinated with TWN-R or TWN-JC. The serum levels of IFNγ (A), IL-12B (B), IL-2 (C), IL-7 (D), and IL-15 (E) were detected post-vaccination using an ELISA. The 7, 28, and 56 dpv serum samples obtained from pigs immunized with TWN-R or TWN-JC were tested and normalized to serum before vaccination. p values of p < 0.05 (*).
Figure 6. Cytokine secretion in pigs (n = 5) vaccinated with TWN-R or TWN-JC. The serum levels of IFNγ (A), IL-12B (B), IL-2 (C), IL-7 (D), and IL-15 (E) were detected post-vaccination using an ELISA. The 7, 28, and 56 dpv serum samples obtained from pigs immunized with TWN-R or TWN-JC were tested and normalized to serum before vaccination. p values of p < 0.05 (*).
Vaccines 11 01487 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hwang, S.Y.; Shin, S.H.; Park, S.-H.; Lee, M.J.; Kim, S.-M.; Lee, J.-S.; Park, J.-H. Serological Conversion through a Second Exposure to Inactivated Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Expressing the JC Epitope on the Viral Surface. Vaccines 2023, 11, 1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11091487

AMA Style

Hwang SY, Shin SH, Park S-H, Lee MJ, Kim S-M, Lee J-S, Park J-H. Serological Conversion through a Second Exposure to Inactivated Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Expressing the JC Epitope on the Viral Surface. Vaccines. 2023; 11(9):1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11091487

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hwang, Seong Yun, Sung Ho Shin, Sung-Han Park, Min Ja Lee, Su-Mi Kim, Jong-Soo Lee, and Jong-Hyeon Park. 2023. "Serological Conversion through a Second Exposure to Inactivated Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Expressing the JC Epitope on the Viral Surface" Vaccines 11, no. 9: 1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11091487

APA Style

Hwang, S. Y., Shin, S. H., Park, S. -H., Lee, M. J., Kim, S. -M., Lee, J. -S., & Park, J. -H. (2023). Serological Conversion through a Second Exposure to Inactivated Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Expressing the JC Epitope on the Viral Surface. Vaccines, 11(9), 1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11091487

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop