1. Introduction
Influenza is a highly contagious viral infection that causes serious complications in children under 5 years of age and those with chronic illness and hospitalization, resulting in a significant public health threat and social burden [
1,
2,
3]. Children can suffer from severe illness, such as severe pneumonia, necrotizing encephalitis, meningitis, etc. [
4]. Currently, health authorities in many countries recommend annual influenza vaccination for children aged 6 months and older [
5,
6,
7].
Influenza viruses are classified into types A, B, C and D based on the antigenicity of nucleoprotein and matrix protein [
8]. Seasonal epidemics of influenza A and B viruses account for the majority of human respiratory disease burden. Although influenza A is historically considered as causing more severe disease, influenza B is also a major cause of epidemics in young children every few years, leading to illness and death [
9,
10]. Due to the high mutation rate and antigenic variation of influenza virus, the whole population is generally susceptible to influenza virus, but the highest infection rate and incidence were found in children during the epidemic season, with the vast majority of severe cases identified in healthy children ≤ 23 months or ≥10 years of age [
11,
12]. A systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the attack rate of influenza in children was 22.5% and that of symptomatic influenza was 12.7% [
13]. The economic impact of childhood influenza is significant, including health care expenditures and indirect costs such as school absenteeism and parents’ loss of work productivity [
14,
15,
16,
17]. A national survey in China in 2013 showed that the economic burden of influenza in outpatient children under 5 years old was USD 196, of which the direct economic burden was USD 121; the cost of hospitalization for children under 5 years of age was USD 1508, of which the direct economic burden was USD 1295 [
18].
Vaccination is the main approach to prevent influenza and its complications [
19], but the vaccine effectiveness varies from year to year due to antigenic drift [
20]. Based on the changes of the circulating influenza strains, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends strains of virus to be used for annual influenza vaccine manufacturing to ensure that the vaccine matches the circulating strains [
21].The traditional trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) contains two influenza A and one influenza B virus strains, often resulting in a mismatch between the vaccine and the circulating strains [
22,
23] due to involvement of only one strain of the B lineage. In contrast to the TIV, the quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) incorporates the Yamagata and Victoria B lineages in addition to influenza A strains (H1N1 and H3N2) to provide broader protection. TIV (split virion) and QIV (split virion) are the only two available influenza vaccines for children aged 6–35 months in China [
6]. Compared to split virion vaccines, the influenza subunit vaccines manufactured by Ab&B Bio-tech Co., Ltd. JS, retain only the highly purified surface antigens, hemagglutinin and neuraminidase, while completely removing internal viral components such as the matrix protein and nucleoprotein, and therefore are likely to have better safety than split influenza virus vaccines [
24,
25] to meet the demand for quadrivalent influenza virus subunits in China.
Comprehensive phase I clinical trials have been conducted for the two different doses of the quadrivalent influenza subunit vaccine, and excellent safety and tolerability in children aged 6 to 35 months were demonstrated post-vaccination [
26]. In terms of safety, the two dose groups (0.5 mL and 0.25 mL) exhibited similar and manageable adverse reaction rates. Within 28 days after the first dose, the total adverse reaction rates were 30.00% and 32.50% (
p = 0.809), respectively. Within 30 days after the second dose, the rates further decreased to 12.50% and 20.51% (
p = 0.337), indicating no increased safety risk with additional vaccination. All adverse reactions were predominantly systemic (e.g., fever), with no local reactions or Grade 3 or higher severe events reported. Regarding immunogenicity, the 0.5 mL dose group demonstrated significantly higher geometric mean titers (GMT) against H3N2, BV and BY subtypes compared to the 0.25 mL dose group (H3N2: 50.98 vs. 21.51,
p = 0.032; BV: 48.40 vs. 23.57,
p < 0.001; BY: 82.82 vs. 40.00,
p = 0.006), while no significant difference was observed in H1N1 antibody GMT (127.73 vs. 77.13,
p = 0.106). Antibody seroconversion rate analysis demonstrated that the 0.5 mL dose group had a significantly higher BV seroconversion rate compared to the 0.25 mL dose group (75.00% vs. 31.58%,
p < 0.001). For other subtypes, although numerical increases were observed in the 0.5 mL group (H1N1: 85.00% vs. 76.32%,
p = 0.331; H3N2: 50.00% vs. 31.58%,
p = 0.098; BY: 75.00% vs. 57.89%,
p = 0.109), these differences were not statistically significant. The ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40 data were consistent with the seroconversion results.
In this study, we conducted a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, blinded, positive-controlled and non-inferiority clinical trial in Henan Province to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the quadrivalent influenza subunit vaccine in healthy children aged 6 to 35 months.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
This phase III clinical trial took place at three locations in Henan Province, China, from 6 February 2023 to 26 February 2024 (NCT05645900). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of two candidate quadrivalent influenza subunit vaccines in children aged 6–35 months.
In this study, 2772 subjects ranging from 6 to 35 months of age were included and randomly allocated to one of three groups, each receiving QIV-Sub-HD (Quadrivalent Influenza Subunit Vaccine, High Dose), QIV-Sub-LD (Quadrivalent Influenza Subunit Vaccine, Low Dose) or QIV-Split-LD (Quadrivalent Influenza Split-Virion Vaccine, Low Dose) in a 1:1:1 distribution. The study flow chart is shown in
Figure S1. The sponsor provided qualified batches of investigational vaccine. This trial used a blinding method to ensure randomization and blinding. The randomization was conducted by a statistician using SAS 9.4 software developed by SAS Institute Inc. (Cary, NC, USA) and the block randomization method.
This study complies with the “Technical Guidelines for Clinical Trials of Vaccines” issued by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), the World Medical Association’s “Declaration of Helsinki” ethical guidelines for conducting medical research involving human participants, China’s current “Good Clinical Practice” (GCP) and all applicable regulations. Prior to the commencement of the study, the Medical Ethics Committee of the Henan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention granted approval for the clinical trial protocol and the informed consent form. Researchers briefed the volunteers and their guardians (or delegates) about the informed consent form details for this clinical trial both orally and in writing. The informed consent form was jointly signed by all voluntary participants, their guardians (or delegates) and the study physicians.
2.2. Participants
Eligibility for study enrollment was determined based on fulfillment of the following criteria: (1) healthy infants and toddlers aged 6 to 35 months; (2) legal guardians voluntarily consenting for the subjects to participate in this study, and legal guardians/delegates signing the “Informed Consent Form” and being able to adhere to the clinical trial protocol requirements. Subjects were excluded before the first dose if they met any of the following conditions: (1) axillary temperature of 37.3 °C or higher at the time of enrollment; (2) laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection within the past six months; (3) vaccination with any influenza vaccine (registered or experimental) within the previous 12 months or intended vaccination throughout the duration of the study; (4) allergy to any component of the study vaccine; (5) history of serious allergy reactions to any vaccine or medication; (6) infants aged 6 to 23 months who were premature (born before 37 weeks of gestation), had low birth weight (less than 2500 g), or had a history of challenging labor, asphyxia resuscitation or neurological impairment; (7) congenital malformations or developmental disorders, genetic defects, severe malnutrition, etc.; (8) presence of an acute illness, a severe chronic condition, or a flare-up of a chronic disease on vaccination day; (9) congenital or acquired immune deficiencies, lymphoma, leukemia or autoimmune diseases; (10) previously diagnosed with asthma, unstable and requiring emergency treatment, hospitalization, intubation or oral or intravenous corticosteroids in the past two years; (11) progressive neurological disorders, history of seizures, epilepsy, brain disease, Guillain-Barré syndrome, psychiatric history or family history; (12) severe cardiovascular disease; (13) absence of spleen, splenic dysfunction or splenectomy or other significant organ removal or partial removal; (14) prior diagnosis of coagulation disorders; (15) vaccination with a live attenuated vaccine within 14 days prior to vaccination or other vaccines within 7 days; (16) treatment with immunostimulants or immunosuppressants within the last 3 months (administered orally or via infusion for more than 14 consecutive days); (17) previous blood or blood product transfusions; (18) plans to move out of the area or long absences from the local area during the scheduled study visits before the study end date; (19) enrollment in other clinical trials is ongoing or planned in the near future; (20) any other condition deemed by the investigator as unsuitable for participation in this clinical trial. Subjects were excluded before the second dose if they met any of the following conditions: (1) serious allergic reaction; (2) severe adverse reactions caused by the first dose; (3) any individuals newly not fulfilling or fulfilling the pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria following vaccination underwent investigator-determined eligibility confirmation; (4) other investigator-determined exclusionary factors.
2.3. Vaccines
QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD are manufactured by Ab&B Bio-tech Co., Ltd. JS (Taizhou, China). The QIV-Split-LD is manufactured by Hualan Biological Vaccine Co., Ltd. (Xinxiang, China). All of these vaccines are manufactured using the influenza A and B virus strains recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and do not contain preservatives or antibiotics. The specific virus strains included are A/Brisbane/02/2018 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus for H1N1, A/Kansas/14/2017 (H3N2)-like virus for H3N2, B/Phuket/3073/2013-like virus (B/Yamagata/16/88 lineage) for B(Y) and B/Colorado/06/2017-like virus (B/Victoria/2/87 lineage) for B(V).
Both QIV-Sub-HD and the QIV-Split-LD are formulated as 0.5 mL per dose, with 15 μg of hemagglutinin for each influenza virus strain included. QIV-Sub-LD is formulated as 0.25 mL per dose, with 7.5 μg of hemagglutinin for each influenza virus strain included. All of these vaccines are administered via intramuscular injection, with a total of 2 doses given 28 days apart.
2.4. Safety
Each subject was monitored for 30 min after immunization for immediate reaction and 0–7 days for active systemic safety after each dose of vaccine. From 7 days post-vaccination, adverse events were monitored with weekly follow-ups and participant self-reporting. Safety monitoring covered 0–28 or 0–30 days post each vaccination. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were tracked from initial vaccination until six months after completing the vaccination schedule.
2.5. Immunogenicity
Blood samples for influenza virus hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody testing were collected both pre-dose and at the 28-day follow-up after final dose administration. At the same time, in order to evaluate the immune persistence, blood samples were collected at 3 and 6 months after final dose administration, with HI antibody levels measured. The seroconversion rate (SCR), the ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40, GMT and geometric mean fold increase (GMFI) were calculated. Seroconversion was defined as HI antibody titer ≥ 1:40 post-immunization (<1:10 serum dilution) or a 4-fold rise in HI antibody titer post-immunization (≥1:10 serum dilution). SCR was defined as the rate of achieving seroconversion after immunization.
Immunogenicity was evaluated using the following criteria: Relative criteria: QIV-Sub-HD or QIV-Sub-LD should be non-inferior to the QIV-Split-LD after 28 days of the full vaccination. For the comparison of non-inferiority, both the GMT and SCR were used as the coprimary end points, that is, the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference in SCRs of four serotypes shared by the QIV-Sub and the QIV-Split should be ≥−10%. Additionally, the lower limit of the 95% CI of GMTQIV-Sub/GMTQIV-Split should be ≥2/3 (equivalent to the difference on the log scale ≥ −0.176). The QIV-Sub can be considered non-inferior to the QIV-Split only if both conditions are met. Absolute criteria: For all four serotypes, the SCRs (two-sided 95% CI lower limit ≥ 30%) and the ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40 (two-sided 95% CI lower limit ≥ 60%) are met at 28 days after full vaccination of QIV-Sub-HD or QIV-Sub-LD in children aged 6–35 months.
Only when the above relative and absolute criteria are met can the robust vaccine immunogenicity in the 6–35-month cohort be determined.
2.6. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 software. In the non-inferiority test, the test level was α (one-sided) = 0.025. Statistical tests for all other conditions were descriptive or exploratory, and therefore no adjustment for multiplicity was applied; thus, the test level for other conditions was α = 0.05.
Safety analysis was performed by the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. The incidence of adverse events/reactions, grade 3 adverse events/reactions, and SAE rates were compared between the QIV-Sub-HD, QIV-Sub-LD and QIV-Split-LD groups.
The primary immunogenicity analysis was conducted using a three-step analysis strategy. Step 1, non-inferiority determination of the QIV-Sub-HD, was performed. The determination of Step 2 could proceed only if the non-inferiority determination of Step 1 was established. Step 2 was performed to determine the non-inferiority of the QIV-Sub-LD. Step 3 was used to determine the SCRs of 4 serotypes of HI antibody and whether the ratio of antibody titer was ≥1:40. If H0 was rejected in Step 1 but not in Step 2, only QIV-Sub-HD would be judged in Step 3. If H0 was rejected in both Steps 1 and 2, then Step 3 was judged for QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD, respectively.
The exploratory analysis was a comparison of antibodies after full vaccination between QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD groups. (1) The χ2 test, corrected χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the SCRs of 4 serotypes of HI antibody and the ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40 between QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD groups. (2) Two independent sample t tests were used to compare the difference in the GMTs of 4 serotypes of HI antibody between QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD groups. (3) The GMI (95%CI) between QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD groups was calculated.
The immune persistence analysis was conducted as follows: (1) Two independent sample t tests were used to compare the GMTs of 4 serotypes of HI antibody in QIV-Sub-HD, QIV-Sub-LD and QIV-Split-LD groups at 3 and 6 months after full vaccination. (2) The χ2 test, corrected χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the difference of SCR (95%CI) and the ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40 (95%CI) between QIV-Sub-HD, QIV-Sub-LD and QIV-Split-LD groups at 3 and 6 months after full vaccination.
4. Discussion
In this phase III trial, we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of two different doses of quadrivalent influenza subunit vaccine in children 6 to 35 months of age. This trial provided data to support the development of the quadrivalent influenza subunit vaccine for children 6–35 months.
The immunogenicity endpoints of this study included the SCR of HI antibody, the ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40, GMT and GMFI 28 days after the full immunization. The HI assay is a widely used and reproducible serological technique that is regarded as the gold standard for evaluating the immune capacity of influenza vaccines and licensure [
27,
28]. In this trial, after immunization with two doses of the quadrivalent influenza virus subunit vaccine, a significant humoral immune response was induced in the subjects, meeting both the relative and the absolute criteria. Compared to the antibody levels prior to vaccination, both QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD elicited a significant increase of GMTs of all four serotypes (H1N1, H3N2, BV and BY). At 28 days after full vaccination, the SCRs of antibodies against H1N1, H3N2, BV and BY were 98.74%, 84.01%, 93.32% and 82.87%, respectively, as induced by QIV-Sub-HD and 95.57%, 78.73%, 87.72% and 81.14%, respectively, as induced by QIV-Sub-LD. The results were consistent with similar studies [
29,
30]. In addition, except for serotype BY, QIV-Sub-HD was statistically higher than QIV-Sub-LD for the other three serotypes (H1N1, H3N2 and BV).
In this study, from immunization of the first dose to 30 days after the full immunization, the overall incidence rates of adverse reactions induced in the QIV-Sub-HD, QIV-Sub-LD, and QIV-Split-LD groups were 29.64%, 33.33% and 29.64%, respectively. In a previous Phase III clinical trial [
31] evaluating the same vaccine (0.5 mL/dose), the overall adverse reaction rates within 0–30 days post-vaccination were 7.00% (4.70~9.96%) and 5.25% (3.28~7.91%) after immunization with QIV-Sub-HD and the QIV-Split-HD. The difference of the adverse reaction rates induced in two separate trials might be twofold in reason: Firstly, different ages of subjects were enrolled in the two trials, and adverse reactions were impacted by age. This trial was consistent with findings in China using similar products in the same age group [
29,
32] and had slightly lower adverse reaction data than the research results in the United States [
30,
33]. Secondly, this clinical trial was initiated shortly after the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions in the country (the first participant was enrolled and vaccinated on 6 February 2023 and the full immunization observation was completed 30 days after, on 13 May 2023), amid the prevalence of various infectious diseases. The adverse reactions occurring in the trial, i.e., fever, cough, diarrhea, vomiting and other symptoms, were considered to be related to the epidemic of coincidentally infectious diseases, such as norovirus infection and COVID-19, during the recruitment period. However, due to insufficient evidence to conclusively rule out vaccine-relatedness, and with strict adjudication of adverse event relatedness, the incidence of adverse reactions in each group was relatively high. In addition, regarding the significantly higher vaccine-related grade 3 fever rate in the QIV-Sub-HD group compared to the other two groups in this study, fever is one of the most common adverse reactions post-vaccination. Most cases were transient, resolving within 1 day. The between-group differences in the vaccine-related grade 3 fever rates may be attributed to coincidental infectious disease outbreaks (e.g., norovirus infection, COVID-19) during the subject enrollment period. However, due to insufficient evidence to definitively exclude a potential association with the vaccine, the causality of adverse events was adjudicated conservatively under maintained blinding. In general, the safety results of each group were similar, and the safety profile was good in healthy subjects aged 6–35 months. This clinical study had some limitations. Firstly, in terms of immunogenicity, only the humoral immune response was evaluated, not the cellular immune response. Secondly, the trial did not verify the protective efficacy of the vaccine.