Next Article in Journal
A Cyclic-di-AMP Adjuvanted CPAF Protein Vaccine Is Immunogenic in Swine, but It Fails to Reduce Genital Chlamydia trachomatis Burden
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Mpox Epidemic: Global Features and Vaccine Prevention Research
Previous Article in Special Issue
COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake and Effectiveness for Hospitalized Cases Among Healthcare Workers in Tertiary Hospital
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Safety and Immunogenicity of a Quadrivalent Influenza Subunit Vaccine in Healthy Children Aged 6–35 Months: A Randomized, Blinded and Positive-Controlled Phase III Clinical Trial

1
Henan Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou 450016, China
2
Ab&B Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. JS, Taizhou 225300, China
3
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Vaccines 2025, 13(5), 467; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050467 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 8 February 2025 / Revised: 18 April 2025 / Accepted: 22 April 2025 / Published: 26 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Immune Responses to Infection and Vaccination)

Abstract

:
Background: Influenza is a serious contagious disease caused by influenza virus. It is particularly dangerous for children, potentially leading to severe and even fatal complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of two candidate quadrivalent influenza subunit vaccines in children aged 6–35 months. Methods: The subjects were randomly divided into three groups at a 1:1:1 ratio and received the corresponding vaccines: QIV-Sub-HD (Quadrivalent Influenza Subunit Vaccine, High Dose), QIV-Sub-LD (Quadrivalent Influenza Subunit Vaccine, Low Dose) and QIV-Split-LD (Quadrivalent Influenza Split-Virion Vaccine, Low Dose). Adverse events were recorded at 30 min, 0–7 days and 8–28 and 30 days after each dose of immunization. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported within 6 months after the full vaccination. Blood samples were collected before the first dose and on 28 days, 3 months and 6 months after full vaccination for antibody detection to evaluate the immunogenicity and duration of immune responses. Results: The results showed that the relative and absolute criteria met the goals set by the clinical trial protocol, indicating that both vaccines are immunogenic. From the first dose to 30 days after full vaccination, the total incidence of adverse reactions in the QIV-Sub-HD, QIV-Sub-LD and QIV-Split-LD groups was 29.64%, 33.33% and 29.64%, respectively. The main symptoms were fever, cough, diarrhea and vomiting. No new safety concerns were identified. Conclusions: The quadrivalent influenza subunit vaccines candidate, manufactured by Ab&B Bio-tech Co., Ltd. JS., are safe and immunogenic in children aged 6–35 months.

1. Introduction

Influenza is a highly contagious viral infection that causes serious complications in children under 5 years of age and those with chronic illness and hospitalization, resulting in a significant public health threat and social burden [1,2,3]. Children can suffer from severe illness, such as severe pneumonia, necrotizing encephalitis, meningitis, etc. [4]. Currently, health authorities in many countries recommend annual influenza vaccination for children aged 6 months and older [5,6,7].
Influenza viruses are classified into types A, B, C and D based on the antigenicity of nucleoprotein and matrix protein [8]. Seasonal epidemics of influenza A and B viruses account for the majority of human respiratory disease burden. Although influenza A is historically considered as causing more severe disease, influenza B is also a major cause of epidemics in young children every few years, leading to illness and death [9,10]. Due to the high mutation rate and antigenic variation of influenza virus, the whole population is generally susceptible to influenza virus, but the highest infection rate and incidence were found in children during the epidemic season, with the vast majority of severe cases identified in healthy children ≤ 23 months or ≥10 years of age [11,12]. A systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the attack rate of influenza in children was 22.5% and that of symptomatic influenza was 12.7% [13]. The economic impact of childhood influenza is significant, including health care expenditures and indirect costs such as school absenteeism and parents’ loss of work productivity [14,15,16,17]. A national survey in China in 2013 showed that the economic burden of influenza in outpatient children under 5 years old was USD 196, of which the direct economic burden was USD 121; the cost of hospitalization for children under 5 years of age was USD 1508, of which the direct economic burden was USD 1295 [18].
Vaccination is the main approach to prevent influenza and its complications [19], but the vaccine effectiveness varies from year to year due to antigenic drift [20]. Based on the changes of the circulating influenza strains, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends strains of virus to be used for annual influenza vaccine manufacturing to ensure that the vaccine matches the circulating strains [21].The traditional trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) contains two influenza A and one influenza B virus strains, often resulting in a mismatch between the vaccine and the circulating strains [22,23] due to involvement of only one strain of the B lineage. In contrast to the TIV, the quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) incorporates the Yamagata and Victoria B lineages in addition to influenza A strains (H1N1 and H3N2) to provide broader protection. TIV (split virion) and QIV (split virion) are the only two available influenza vaccines for children aged 6–35 months in China [6]. Compared to split virion vaccines, the influenza subunit vaccines manufactured by Ab&B Bio-tech Co., Ltd. JS, retain only the highly purified surface antigens, hemagglutinin and neuraminidase, while completely removing internal viral components such as the matrix protein and nucleoprotein, and therefore are likely to have better safety than split influenza virus vaccines [24,25] to meet the demand for quadrivalent influenza virus subunits in China.
Comprehensive phase I clinical trials have been conducted for the two different doses of the quadrivalent influenza subunit vaccine, and excellent safety and tolerability in children aged 6 to 35 months were demonstrated post-vaccination [26]. In terms of safety, the two dose groups (0.5 mL and 0.25 mL) exhibited similar and manageable adverse reaction rates. Within 28 days after the first dose, the total adverse reaction rates were 30.00% and 32.50% (p = 0.809), respectively. Within 30 days after the second dose, the rates further decreased to 12.50% and 20.51% (p = 0.337), indicating no increased safety risk with additional vaccination. All adverse reactions were predominantly systemic (e.g., fever), with no local reactions or Grade 3 or higher severe events reported. Regarding immunogenicity, the 0.5 mL dose group demonstrated significantly higher geometric mean titers (GMT) against H3N2, BV and BY subtypes compared to the 0.25 mL dose group (H3N2: 50.98 vs. 21.51, p = 0.032; BV: 48.40 vs. 23.57, p < 0.001; BY: 82.82 vs. 40.00, p = 0.006), while no significant difference was observed in H1N1 antibody GMT (127.73 vs. 77.13, p = 0.106). Antibody seroconversion rate analysis demonstrated that the 0.5 mL dose group had a significantly higher BV seroconversion rate compared to the 0.25 mL dose group (75.00% vs. 31.58%, p < 0.001). For other subtypes, although numerical increases were observed in the 0.5 mL group (H1N1: 85.00% vs. 76.32%, p = 0.331; H3N2: 50.00% vs. 31.58%, p = 0.098; BY: 75.00% vs. 57.89%, p = 0.109), these differences were not statistically significant. The ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40 data were consistent with the seroconversion results.
In this study, we conducted a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, blinded, positive-controlled and non-inferiority clinical trial in Henan Province to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the quadrivalent influenza subunit vaccine in healthy children aged 6 to 35 months.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This phase III clinical trial took place at three locations in Henan Province, China, from 6 February 2023 to 26 February 2024 (NCT05645900). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of two candidate quadrivalent influenza subunit vaccines in children aged 6–35 months.
In this study, 2772 subjects ranging from 6 to 35 months of age were included and randomly allocated to one of three groups, each receiving QIV-Sub-HD (Quadrivalent Influenza Subunit Vaccine, High Dose), QIV-Sub-LD (Quadrivalent Influenza Subunit Vaccine, Low Dose) or QIV-Split-LD (Quadrivalent Influenza Split-Virion Vaccine, Low Dose) in a 1:1:1 distribution. The study flow chart is shown in Figure S1. The sponsor provided qualified batches of investigational vaccine. This trial used a blinding method to ensure randomization and blinding. The randomization was conducted by a statistician using SAS 9.4 software developed by SAS Institute Inc. (Cary, NC, USA) and the block randomization method.
This study complies with the “Technical Guidelines for Clinical Trials of Vaccines” issued by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), the World Medical Association’s “Declaration of Helsinki” ethical guidelines for conducting medical research involving human participants, China’s current “Good Clinical Practice” (GCP) and all applicable regulations. Prior to the commencement of the study, the Medical Ethics Committee of the Henan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention granted approval for the clinical trial protocol and the informed consent form. Researchers briefed the volunteers and their guardians (or delegates) about the informed consent form details for this clinical trial both orally and in writing. The informed consent form was jointly signed by all voluntary participants, their guardians (or delegates) and the study physicians.

2.2. Participants

Eligibility for study enrollment was determined based on fulfillment of the following criteria: (1) healthy infants and toddlers aged 6 to 35 months; (2) legal guardians voluntarily consenting for the subjects to participate in this study, and legal guardians/delegates signing the “Informed Consent Form” and being able to adhere to the clinical trial protocol requirements. Subjects were excluded before the first dose if they met any of the following conditions: (1) axillary temperature of 37.3 °C or higher at the time of enrollment; (2) laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection within the past six months; (3) vaccination with any influenza vaccine (registered or experimental) within the previous 12 months or intended vaccination throughout the duration of the study; (4) allergy to any component of the study vaccine; (5) history of serious allergy reactions to any vaccine or medication; (6) infants aged 6 to 23 months who were premature (born before 37 weeks of gestation), had low birth weight (less than 2500 g), or had a history of challenging labor, asphyxia resuscitation or neurological impairment; (7) congenital malformations or developmental disorders, genetic defects, severe malnutrition, etc.; (8) presence of an acute illness, a severe chronic condition, or a flare-up of a chronic disease on vaccination day; (9) congenital or acquired immune deficiencies, lymphoma, leukemia or autoimmune diseases; (10) previously diagnosed with asthma, unstable and requiring emergency treatment, hospitalization, intubation or oral or intravenous corticosteroids in the past two years; (11) progressive neurological disorders, history of seizures, epilepsy, brain disease, Guillain-Barré syndrome, psychiatric history or family history; (12) severe cardiovascular disease; (13) absence of spleen, splenic dysfunction or splenectomy or other significant organ removal or partial removal; (14) prior diagnosis of coagulation disorders; (15) vaccination with a live attenuated vaccine within 14 days prior to vaccination or other vaccines within 7 days; (16) treatment with immunostimulants or immunosuppressants within the last 3 months (administered orally or via infusion for more than 14 consecutive days); (17) previous blood or blood product transfusions; (18) plans to move out of the area or long absences from the local area during the scheduled study visits before the study end date; (19) enrollment in other clinical trials is ongoing or planned in the near future; (20) any other condition deemed by the investigator as unsuitable for participation in this clinical trial. Subjects were excluded before the second dose if they met any of the following conditions: (1) serious allergic reaction; (2) severe adverse reactions caused by the first dose; (3) any individuals newly not fulfilling or fulfilling the pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria following vaccination underwent investigator-determined eligibility confirmation; (4) other investigator-determined exclusionary factors.

2.3. Vaccines

QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD are manufactured by Ab&B Bio-tech Co., Ltd. JS (Taizhou, China). The QIV-Split-LD is manufactured by Hualan Biological Vaccine Co., Ltd. (Xinxiang, China). All of these vaccines are manufactured using the influenza A and B virus strains recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and do not contain preservatives or antibiotics. The specific virus strains included are A/Brisbane/02/2018 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus for H1N1, A/Kansas/14/2017 (H3N2)-like virus for H3N2, B/Phuket/3073/2013-like virus (B/Yamagata/16/88 lineage) for B(Y) and B/Colorado/06/2017-like virus (B/Victoria/2/87 lineage) for B(V).
Both QIV-Sub-HD and the QIV-Split-LD are formulated as 0.5 mL per dose, with 15 μg of hemagglutinin for each influenza virus strain included. QIV-Sub-LD is formulated as 0.25 mL per dose, with 7.5 μg of hemagglutinin for each influenza virus strain included. All of these vaccines are administered via intramuscular injection, with a total of 2 doses given 28 days apart.

2.4. Safety

Each subject was monitored for 30 min after immunization for immediate reaction and 0–7 days for active systemic safety after each dose of vaccine. From 7 days post-vaccination, adverse events were monitored with weekly follow-ups and participant self-reporting. Safety monitoring covered 0–28 or 0–30 days post each vaccination. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were tracked from initial vaccination until six months after completing the vaccination schedule.

2.5. Immunogenicity

Blood samples for influenza virus hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody testing were collected both pre-dose and at the 28-day follow-up after final dose administration. At the same time, in order to evaluate the immune persistence, blood samples were collected at 3 and 6 months after final dose administration, with HI antibody levels measured. The seroconversion rate (SCR), the ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40, GMT and geometric mean fold increase (GMFI) were calculated. Seroconversion was defined as HI antibody titer ≥ 1:40 post-immunization (<1:10 serum dilution) or a 4-fold rise in HI antibody titer post-immunization (≥1:10 serum dilution). SCR was defined as the rate of achieving seroconversion after immunization.
Immunogenicity was evaluated using the following criteria: Relative criteria: QIV-Sub-HD or QIV-Sub-LD should be non-inferior to the QIV-Split-LD after 28 days of the full vaccination. For the comparison of non-inferiority, both the GMT and SCR were used as the coprimary end points, that is, the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference in SCRs of four serotypes shared by the QIV-Sub and the QIV-Split should be ≥−10%. Additionally, the lower limit of the 95% CI of GMTQIV-Sub/GMTQIV-Split should be ≥2/3 (equivalent to the difference on the log scale ≥ −0.176). The QIV-Sub can be considered non-inferior to the QIV-Split only if both conditions are met. Absolute criteria: For all four serotypes, the SCRs (two-sided 95% CI lower limit ≥ 30%) and the ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40 (two-sided 95% CI lower limit ≥ 60%) are met at 28 days after full vaccination of QIV-Sub-HD or QIV-Sub-LD in children aged 6–35 months.
Only when the above relative and absolute criteria are met can the robust vaccine immunogenicity in the 6–35-month cohort be determined.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 software. In the non-inferiority test, the test level was α (one-sided) = 0.025. Statistical tests for all other conditions were descriptive or exploratory, and therefore no adjustment for multiplicity was applied; thus, the test level for other conditions was α = 0.05.
Safety analysis was performed by the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. The incidence of adverse events/reactions, grade 3 adverse events/reactions, and SAE rates were compared between the QIV-Sub-HD, QIV-Sub-LD and QIV-Split-LD groups.
The primary immunogenicity analysis was conducted using a three-step analysis strategy. Step 1, non-inferiority determination of the QIV-Sub-HD, was performed. The determination of Step 2 could proceed only if the non-inferiority determination of Step 1 was established. Step 2 was performed to determine the non-inferiority of the QIV-Sub-LD. Step 3 was used to determine the SCRs of 4 serotypes of HI antibody and whether the ratio of antibody titer was ≥1:40. If H0 was rejected in Step 1 but not in Step 2, only QIV-Sub-HD would be judged in Step 3. If H0 was rejected in both Steps 1 and 2, then Step 3 was judged for QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD, respectively.
The exploratory analysis was a comparison of antibodies after full vaccination between QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD groups. (1) The χ2 test, corrected χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the SCRs of 4 serotypes of HI antibody and the ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40 between QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD groups. (2) Two independent sample t tests were used to compare the difference in the GMTs of 4 serotypes of HI antibody between QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD groups. (3) The GMI (95%CI) between QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD groups was calculated.
The immune persistence analysis was conducted as follows: (1) Two independent sample t tests were used to compare the GMTs of 4 serotypes of HI antibody in QIV-Sub-HD, QIV-Sub-LD and QIV-Split-LD groups at 3 and 6 months after full vaccination. (2) The χ2 test, corrected χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the difference of SCR (95%CI) and the ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40 (95%CI) between QIV-Sub-HD, QIV-Sub-LD and QIV-Split-LD groups at 3 and 6 months after full vaccination.

3. Results

3.1. Subjects

As shown in Figure 1, 3186 participants were screened, and 2772 subjects were enrolled, of whom 2766 completed the first vaccination and 2652 completed the last vaccination. During the trial, 40, 33 and 47 subjects did not complete the vaccination/safety observation in the QIV-Sub-HD group, QIV-Sub-LD group and QIV-Split-LD group, respectively. In addition, 52, 46 and 61 subjects did not complete the immunogenicity blood collection in the QIV-Sub-HD group, QIV-Sub-LD group and QIV-Split-LD group, respectively. Finally, 10, 3 and 5 visits were terminated due to adverse events in the QIV-Sub-HD, QIV-Sub-LD, and QIV-Split-LD groups, respectively.
The average age and gender composition of the subjects in the QIV-Sub-HD group, the QIV-Sub-LD group and the QIV-Split-LD group were balanced, with no statistically significant differences among the three groups (Table 1).

3.2. Safety

The total adverse reaction rates in QIV-Sub-HD, QIV-Sub-LD and QIV-Split-LD groups (from first vaccination through 30 days following the second vaccination) were 29.64%, 33.33% and 29.64%, respectively. Most adverse reactions occurred within the initial 7 days (including 30 min) post-vaccination, and there was no significant difference between any two groups. The solicited local adverse reaction rate in the QIV-Sub-HD group was significantly lower than that in QIV-Split-LD, and the unsolicited adverse reaction rate in QIV-Sub-LD was significantly higher than that in the QIV-Split HD group. There was no significant difference between any two groups in the other serotypes (Table 2).
From first vaccination through 30 days following the second vaccination., the adverse reactions in each group were mainly grade 1 or 2, and no grade 3 local adverse reactions occurred. The grade 1 adverse reaction rate in the QIV-Sub-HD group was significantly lower than that in QIV-Sub-LD and QIV-Split-LD. The vaccine-related grade 3 fever rate in the QIV-Sub-HD group was higher than that in QIV-Sub-LD and QIV-Split-LD, and the difference was statistically significant (Table 3).
From first vaccination through 30 days following the second vaccination, the most common adverse reactions were fever, runny nose, vomiting, cough, diarrhea and erythema at the injection site. Fever rates related to vaccination were 15.64% (13.35–18.14%), 14.94% (12.70–17.40%) and 11.83% (9.82–14.10%) in the QIV-Sub-HD, QIV-Sub-LD and QIV-Split-LD groups, respectively. The fever rate in the QIV-Sub-HD group was significantly higher than in QIV-Split-LD. The runny nose rates related to vaccination were 7.82% (6.17–9.74%), 10.39% (8.50–12.54%) and 7.27% (5.68–9.15%), respectively, with runny nose rate in the QIV-Sub-HD group being significantly higher than in QIV-Split-LD. The cough rates related to vaccination were 4.45% (3.21–5.99%), 5.30% (3.95–6.95%) and 5.43% (4.06–7.09%), respectively. The vomiting rates related to vaccination were 5.10% (3.77–6.73%), 5.41% (4.04–7.07%) and 4.99% (3.68–6.61%), respectively. The diarrhea rates related to vaccination were 3.91% (2.75–5.37%), 4.11% (2.93–5.60%) and 5.10% (3.77–6.73%), respectively. The erythema rates at the injection site related to vaccination were 2.28% (1.42–3.46%), 2.71% (1.76–3.97%) and 3.58% (2.48–5.00%), respectively (Table 4). There was only one vaccine-related SAE in the trial, which was diarrhea in a subject in the QIV-Sub-HD group. This SAE occurred on Day 11 after vaccination, which is relatively close to the time of vaccine administration, and diarrhea is one of the more common adverse reactions to the vaccine. Although the subject had received two antibiotics prior to hospital admission, and the diarrhea symptoms began on the third day of antibiotic use (suggesting a possible antibiotic-induced dysbiosis), we cannot completely rule out a potential association with the vaccine. Therefore, this SAE was considered possibly related to the vaccination.

3.3. Immunogenicity

PPS (Per Protocol Set) was used as the primary immunogenicity analysis. The non-inferiority test for the relative immunogenicity of QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD, as compared with QIV-Split-LD, was performed in a fixed sequence. In comparison with QIV-Split-LD, the lower limits of 95%CI of the SCRs of four serotypes in the QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD groups were all ≥−10%, and the lower limits of 95%CI of the GMT ratios were all ≥2/3, indicating that the both vaccines were non-inferior to the QIV-Split-LD (Table 5 and Table 6). When the absolute criteria were used, the lower limits of 95%CI of the SCR of QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD were >30%, and the lower limits of 95%CI of the ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40 were >60% in the total population (Table 6). In conclusion, the immunogenicity in subjects of QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD met both the relative and absolute goals set by the clinical trial protocol, indicating that the two vaccines elicit robust immunogenicity in the population aged 6–35 months.
In a comparative analysis of antibody responses 28 days after full vaccination, QIV-Sub-HD induced significantly higher SCRs for antibodies against H1N1, H3N2 and BV than QIV-Sub-LD, while the difference of the SCRs of the antibody against BY was not statistically significant (Table 6). Additionally, the GMT antibodies against H1N1 and H3N2 were significantly higher as induced by QIV-Sub-HD than QIV-Sub-LD. However, the differences in the GMT of antibodies against BV and BY were not statistically significant (Table 5). Moreover, the ratios of antibody titers ≥ 1:40 against H1N1, H3N2 and BV were statistically significantly higher as induced by QIV-Sub-HD than by QIV-Sub-LD, whereas the difference in the ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40 against BY was not statistically significant (Table 6).
At 3 and 6 months after full vaccination, there was a reduction in immune responses in all groups; however, the SCR, GMT and ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40 against H1N1 induced by QIV-Sub-HD were significantly higher than those induced by QIV-Sub-LD and QIV-Split-LD, suggesting that QIV-Sub-HD elicited a better long-lasting immunity than QIV-Sub-LD and QIV-Split-LD, while there were no significant differences in the SCR, GMT and ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40 among the other three serotypes (H1N1, H3N2 and BV) (Table 7 and Table 8).
Taking the above data into consideration, QIV-Sub-HD elicited better immunity in children aged 6–35 months, mainly reflected by induction of stronger responses against the H1N1, H3N2 and BV.

4. Discussion

In this phase III trial, we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of two different doses of quadrivalent influenza subunit vaccine in children 6 to 35 months of age. This trial provided data to support the development of the quadrivalent influenza subunit vaccine for children 6–35 months.
The immunogenicity endpoints of this study included the SCR of HI antibody, the ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40, GMT and GMFI 28 days after the full immunization. The HI assay is a widely used and reproducible serological technique that is regarded as the gold standard for evaluating the immune capacity of influenza vaccines and licensure [27,28]. In this trial, after immunization with two doses of the quadrivalent influenza virus subunit vaccine, a significant humoral immune response was induced in the subjects, meeting both the relative and the absolute criteria. Compared to the antibody levels prior to vaccination, both QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD elicited a significant increase of GMTs of all four serotypes (H1N1, H3N2, BV and BY). At 28 days after full vaccination, the SCRs of antibodies against H1N1, H3N2, BV and BY were 98.74%, 84.01%, 93.32% and 82.87%, respectively, as induced by QIV-Sub-HD and 95.57%, 78.73%, 87.72% and 81.14%, respectively, as induced by QIV-Sub-LD. The results were consistent with similar studies [29,30]. In addition, except for serotype BY, QIV-Sub-HD was statistically higher than QIV-Sub-LD for the other three serotypes (H1N1, H3N2 and BV).
In this study, from immunization of the first dose to 30 days after the full immunization, the overall incidence rates of adverse reactions induced in the QIV-Sub-HD, QIV-Sub-LD, and QIV-Split-LD groups were 29.64%, 33.33% and 29.64%, respectively. In a previous Phase III clinical trial [31] evaluating the same vaccine (0.5 mL/dose), the overall adverse reaction rates within 0–30 days post-vaccination were 7.00% (4.70~9.96%) and 5.25% (3.28~7.91%) after immunization with QIV-Sub-HD and the QIV-Split-HD. The difference of the adverse reaction rates induced in two separate trials might be twofold in reason: Firstly, different ages of subjects were enrolled in the two trials, and adverse reactions were impacted by age. This trial was consistent with findings in China using similar products in the same age group [29,32] and had slightly lower adverse reaction data than the research results in the United States [30,33]. Secondly, this clinical trial was initiated shortly after the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions in the country (the first participant was enrolled and vaccinated on 6 February 2023 and the full immunization observation was completed 30 days after, on 13 May 2023), amid the prevalence of various infectious diseases. The adverse reactions occurring in the trial, i.e., fever, cough, diarrhea, vomiting and other symptoms, were considered to be related to the epidemic of coincidentally infectious diseases, such as norovirus infection and COVID-19, during the recruitment period. However, due to insufficient evidence to conclusively rule out vaccine-relatedness, and with strict adjudication of adverse event relatedness, the incidence of adverse reactions in each group was relatively high. In addition, regarding the significantly higher vaccine-related grade 3 fever rate in the QIV-Sub-HD group compared to the other two groups in this study, fever is one of the most common adverse reactions post-vaccination. Most cases were transient, resolving within 1 day. The between-group differences in the vaccine-related grade 3 fever rates may be attributed to coincidental infectious disease outbreaks (e.g., norovirus infection, COVID-19) during the subject enrollment period. However, due to insufficient evidence to definitively exclude a potential association with the vaccine, the causality of adverse events was adjudicated conservatively under maintained blinding. In general, the safety results of each group were similar, and the safety profile was good in healthy subjects aged 6–35 months. This clinical study had some limitations. Firstly, in terms of immunogenicity, only the humoral immune response was evaluated, not the cellular immune response. Secondly, the trial did not verify the protective efficacy of the vaccine.

5. Conclusions

QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD manufactured by Ab&b Bio-tech Co., Ltd. JS., demonstrated a good safety profile and immunogenicity when administered in a two-dose regimen to a healthy population aged 6–35 months. Comparative analysis of the safety results for the full course of QIV-Sub-HD and QIV-Sub-LD, as well as the immunogenicity results at 28 days, 3 months and 6 months after full vaccination, suggests that QIV-Sub-HD, while within acceptable safety parameters, shows relatively stronger immunogenicity results.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vaccines13050467/s1, Figure S1: Study Flow Chart.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.L., Y.Z. (Yuhui Zhang), X.Z., K.W., Y.A. and Y.W.; methodology, X.C., Q.L. and W.L.; formal analysis, Y.Y.; investigation, L.H., W.Z., J.T. and Y.W.; resources, C.J., H.J. and R.A.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z. (Yaodong Zhang); writing—review and editing, G.L., X.Z. and Y.Z. (Yaodong Zhang); project administration, G.L. and X.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was sponsored by Ab&B Bio-tech Co., Ltd. JS.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration, and this study, involving human participants, was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Henan Provincial Disease Control and Prevention (Protocol code: 2017L04970/1-3, approval date: 29 September 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

All eligible participants provided their written informed consent before enrolment.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the investigators at Henan Provincial CDC, Puyang County CDC, Changge City CDC, Yanjin County CDC, and the staff of the National Institute for Food and Drug Control for their contributions to immunological analyses. We also express our gratitude to Eileen Xiong at Yither Biotech Co., Ltd., for reviewing the manuscript. Finally, we are grateful for all volunteers who took part in this trial.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no financial interests/personal relationships that may be considered as potential competing interests [G.L., Y.Z. (Yuhui Zhang), X.Z., K.W., C.J., X.C., Q.L., H.J., R.A., W.L., Y.A. and Y.Z. (Yaodong Zhang) are employees of Ab&B Bio-tech Co., Ltd., the company that provided funding and the tested vaccine for this study]. Ab&B Bio-Tech Co., Ltd., had a role in the study design, data collection and interpretation, and the decision to submit the work for publication.

References

  1. Iskander, M.; Booy, R.; Lambert, S. The burden of influenza in children. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 20, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fraaij, P.L.; Heikkinen, T. Seasonal influenza: The burden of disease in children. Vaccine 2011, 29, 7524–7528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Committee on Infectious Diseases. Recommendations for Prevention and Control of Influenza in Children, 2022–2023. Pediatrics 2022, 150, e2022059275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mossad, S.B. COVID-19 and flu: Dual threat, dual opportunity. Cleve Clin. J. Med. 2020, 87, 651–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Campbell, A.J.P.; Grohskopf, L.A. Updates on Influenza Vaccination in Children. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2018, 32, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. National Immunization Advisory Committee (NIAC) Technical Working Group (TWG); Influenza Vaccination TWG. [Technical guidelines for seasonal influenza vaccination in China (2023–2024)]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2023, 44, 1507–1530. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheun, H.; Song, J.; Park, S.; Lee, D.; Korean Disease Control Agency. Influenza sentinel surveillance report in Republic of Korea, 2019–2020. PHWR Public Health Wkly. Rep. 2019, 12, 2241–2249. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
  8. Bailey, E.S.; Choi, J.Y.; Fieldhouse, J.K.; Borkenhagen, L.K.; Zemke, J.; Zhang, D.; Gray, G.C. The continual threat of influenza virus infections at the human-animal interface: What is new from a one health perspective? Evol. Med. Public Health. 2018, 2018, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Paul Glezen, W.; Schmier, J.K.; Kuehn, C.M.; Ryan, K.J.; Oxford, J. The burden of influenza B: A structured literature review. Am. J. Public Health 2013, 103, e43–e51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Belshe, R.B. The need for quadrivalent vaccine against seasonal influenza. Vaccine 2010, 28 (Suppl. S4), D45–D53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tran, D.; Vaudry, W.; Moore, D.; Bettinger, J.A.; Halperin, S.A.; Scheifele, D.W.; Jadvji, T.; Lee, L.; Mersereau, T.; Members of the Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program Active. Hospitalization for Influenza A Versus B. Pediatrics 2016, 138, e20154643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Webster, R.G.; Monto, A.S.; Braciale, T.J.; Lamb, R.A. Textbook of Influenza, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  13. Somes, M.P.; Turner, R.M.; Dwyer, L.J.; Newall, A.T. Estimating the annual attack rate of seasonal influenza among unvaccinated individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine 2018, 36, 3199–3207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ortega-Sanchez, I.R.; Molinari, N.-A.M.; Fairbrother, G.; Szilagyi, P.G.; Edwards, K.M.; Griffin, M.R.; Cassedy, A.; Poehling, K.A.; Bridges, C.; Staat, M.A. Indirect, out-of-pocket and medical costs from influenza-related illness in young children. Vaccine 2012, 30, 4175–4181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Antonova, E.N.; Rycroft, C.E.; Ambrose, C.S.; Heikkinen, T.; Principi, N. Burden of paediatric influenza in Western Europe: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 2012, 12, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Molinari, N.-A.M.; Ortega-Sanchez, I.R.; Messonnier, M.L.; Thompson, W.W.; Wortley, P.M.; Weintraub, E.; Bridges, C.B. The annual impact of seasonal influenza in the US: Measuring disease burden and costs. Vaccine 2007, 25, 5086–5096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Willis, G.A.; Preen, D.B.; Richmond, P.C.; Jacoby, P.; Effler, P.V.; Smith, D.W.; Robins, C.; Borland, M.L.; Levy, A.; Keil, A.D.; et al. The impact of influenza infection on young children, their family and the health care system. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 2019, 13, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, J.; Jit, M.; Leung, K.S.; Zheng, Y.-M.; Feng, L.-Z.; Wang, L.-P.; Lau, E.H.Y.; Wu, J.T.; Yu, H.-J. The economic burden of influenza-associated outpatient visits and hospitalizations in China: A retrospective survey. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2015, 4, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Buchy, P.; Badur, S. Who and when to vaccinate against influenza. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 93, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Esposito, S.; Nauta, J.; Lapini, G.; Montomoli, E.; van de Witte, S. Efficacy and safety of a quadrivalent influenza vaccine in children aged 6-35 months: A global, multiseasonal, controlled, randomized Phase III study. Vaccine 2022, 40, 2626–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vaccines against influenza WHO position paper–November 2012. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 2012, 87, 461–476.
  22. Crépey, P.; de Boer, P.T.; Postma, M.J.; Pitman, R. Retrospective public health impact of a quadrivalent influenza vaccine in the United States. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 2015, 9 (Suppl. S1), 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Heikkinen, T.; Ikonen, N.; Ziegler, T. Impact of influenza B lineage-level mismatch between trivalent seasonal influenza vaccines and circulating viruses, 1999–2012. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 59, 1519–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, X.M.; Gao, F.; Yu, Y.X.; Wei, Y.; Xiong, S.; Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Xu, D.; Huang, S. A New Generation of Vaccine, 2nd ed.; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dong, P.M.; Li, Y.Q.; Zheng, T.Z.; Jia, Y.P.; Li, F.; Han, T.W.; Qiao, R.X.; Zhang, B.H. [Comparative study on safety and immunogenicity between influenza subunit vaccine and split vaccine]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2003, 24, 570–573. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, H.; Huang, L.; Yu, H.; Xie, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, W.; Chen, X.; Zhang, H.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a quadrivalent inactivated subunit non-adjuvanted influenza vaccine: A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled phase 1 clinical trial. Vaccine 2021, 39, 3871–3878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Basu, I.; Agarwal, M.; Shah, V.; Shukla, V.; Naik, S.; Supe, P.D.; Srivastava, M.K.; Giriraja, K.V.; Pinjar, P.; Mishra, P.K.; et al. Immunogenicity and safety of two quadrivalent influenza vaccines in healthy adult and elderly participants in India - A phase III, active-controlled, randomized clinical study. Hum. Vaccin Immunother. 2022, 18, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. McCullers, J.A. Influenza Viruses. In Feigin and Cherry’s Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases; Cherry, J.D., Harrison, G.J., Kaplan, S.L., Steinbach, W.J., Hotez, P.J., Eds.; Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 1729–1745. [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, X.; Park, J.; Xia, S.; Liang, B.; Yang, S.; Wang, Y.; Syrkina, O.; Lavis, N.; Liu, S.; Zhao, C.; et al. Immunological non-inferiority and safety of a quadrival-ent inactivated influenza vaccine versus two trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines in China: Results from two studies. Hum. Vaccin Immunother. 2022, 18, 2132798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Robertson, C.A.; Mercer, M.; Selmani, A.; Klein, N.P.; Jeanfreau, R.; Greenberg, D.P. Safety and Immunogenicity of a Full-dose, Split-virion, Inactivated, Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Children 6-35 Months of Age: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2019, 38, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jia, C.; Li, G.; Zhang, W.; Li, Q.; Chen, X.; Leng, W.; Huang, L.; Xie, Z.; et al. Immunogenicity and safety of an egg culture-based quadrivalent inactivated non-adjuvanted subunit influenza vaccine in subjects ≥3 years: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, active-controlled phase III, non-inferiority trial. Vaccine 2022, 40, 4933–4941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hu, Y.; Shao, M.; Hu, Y.; Liang, Q.; Jia, N.; Chu, K.; Xu, L.; Li, J.; Li, C.; Zhu, F. Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine: A randomized, double-blind, controlled phase III clinical trial in children aged 6–35 months in China. Hum. Vaccin Immunother. 2020, 16, 1691–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jain, V.K.; Domachowske, J.B.; Wang, L.; Ofori-Anyinam, O.; Rodríguez-Weber, M.A.; Leonardi, M.L.; Klein, N.P.; Schlichter, G.; Jeanfreau, R.; Haney, B.L.; et al. Time to Change Dosing of Inactivated Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Young Children: Evidence From a Phase III, Randomized, Controlled Trial. J. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. Soc. 2017, 6, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow chart of screening of all subjects. SST: Safety set total; SS1: Dose 1 safety set; SS2: Dose 2 safety set; FAS: Full analysis set; PPS: Per protocol set; IPS1: Immune persistence set 3 months post-vaccination; IPS2: Immune persistence set 6 months post-vaccination.
Figure 1. Flow chart of screening of all subjects. SST: Safety set total; SS1: Dose 1 safety set; SS2: Dose 2 safety set; FAS: Full analysis set; PPS: Per protocol set; IPS1: Immune persistence set 3 months post-vaccination; IPS2: Immune persistence set 6 months post-vaccination.
Vaccines 13 00467 g001
Table 1. Baseline demographics and characteristics.
Table 1. Baseline demographics and characteristics.
QIV-Sub-HD GroupQIV-Sub-LD GroupQIV-Split-LD Groupp
Age (months)
Medium (P25, P75)22.73 (14.30, 29.00)22.85 (14.52, 29.24)23.67 (15.35, 29.97)
Mean ± SD21.86 ± 8.5722.10 ± 8.6422.72 ± 8.620.086
Sex
Male (%)481 (52.06)455 (49.24)454 (49.13)0.363
Female (%)443 (47.94)469 (50.76)470 (50.87)
Note: Data are mean (SD), median (P25, P75) or numbers (%). The χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare whether the sex composition of the subjects was balanced among the groups, One-way ANOVA was used to compare whether the mean age of the subjects was balanced among the groups.
Table 2. Adverse reaction rates by type (solicited/unsolicited) from first vaccination through 30 days following the second vaccination.
Table 2. Adverse reaction rates by type (solicited/unsolicited) from first vaccination through 30 days following the second vaccination.
TypeGroupnAdverse Reaction Rates (95%CI)p
TotalQIV-Sub-HD92129.64 (26.71~32.71)0.088 a
QIV-Sub-LD92433.33 (30.30~36.48)0.088 b
QIV-Split-LD92129.64 (26.71~32.71)>0.999 c
SolicitedQIV-Sub-HD92124.86 (22.10~27.79)0.200 a
QIV-Sub-LD92427.49 (24.63~30.49)0.337 b
QIV-Split-LD92125.52 (22.73~28.46)0.747 c
Solicited localQIV-Sub-HD9212.39 (1.50~3.59)0.326 a
QIV-Sub-LD9243.14 (2.11~4.48)0.140 b
QIV-Split-LD9214.45 (3.21~5.99)0.015 c
Solicited systemicQIV-Sub-HD92123.34 (20.65~26.21)0.377 a
QIV-Sub-LD92425.11 (22.34~28.03)0.184 b
QIV-Split-LD92122.48 (19.82~25.31)0.657 c
UnsolicitedQIV-Sub-HD9218.69 (6.95~10.69)0.066 a
QIV-Sub-LD92411.26 (9.29~13.47)0.037 b
QIV-Split-LD9218.36 (6.65~10.34)0.802 c
Note: Data are rates (95%CI). The χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the adverse reaction rates among the groups. a QIV-Sub-HD vs. QIV-Sub-LD; b QIV-Sub-LD vs. QIV-Split-LD; c QIV-Sub-HD vs. QIV-Split-LD.
Table 3. The adverse reaction rate overview was graded according to symptoms from first vaccination through 30 days following the second vaccination.
Table 3. The adverse reaction rate overview was graded according to symptoms from first vaccination through 30 days following the second vaccination.
SymptomGroupnGrade 1pGrade 2pGrade 3p
nRates (95%CI) nRates (95%CI) nRates (95%CI)
TotalQIV-Sub-HD92113014.12 (11.93~16.53)0.004 a18019.54 (17.03~22.25)0.879 a151.63 (0.91~2.67)0.140 a
QIV-Sub-LD92417619.05 (16.56~21.73)0.572 b17819.26 (16.77~21.96)0.122 b80.87 (0.37~1.70)0.249 b
QIV-Split-LD92116618.02 (15.59~20.66)0.022 c15216.50 (14.16~19.06)0.090 c40.43 (0.12~1.11)0.011 c
Systemic
FeverQIV-Sub-HD921353.80 (2.66~5.25)0.424 a10010.86 (8.92~13.05)0.687 a121.30 (0.68~2.26)0.044 a
QIV-Sub-LD924424.55 (3.30~6.09)0.068 b9510.28 (8.40~12.42)0.277 b40.43 (0.12~1.10)>0.999 b
QIV-Split-LD921272.93 (1.94~4.24)0.301 c818.79 (7.05~10.81)0.137 c30.33 (0.07~0.95)0.020 c
CoughQIV-Sub-HD921131.41 (0.75~2.40)0.467 a283.04 (2.03~4.36)0.701 a00.00 (0.00~0.40)>0.999 a
QIV-Sub-LD924171.84 (1.08~2.93)0.857 b313.35 (2.29~4.73)0.789 b10.11 (0.00~0.60)>0.999 b
QIV-Split-LD921181.95 (1.16~3.07)0.365 c333.58 (2.48~5.00)0.515 c00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
Runny noseQIV-Sub-HD921262.82 (1.85~4.11)0.300 a475.10 (3.77~6.73)0.082 a00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Sub-LD924343.68 (2.56~5.10)0.446 b657.03 (5.47~8.88)0.009 b00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Split-LD921283.04 (2.03~4.36)0.782 c394.23 (3.03~5.74)0.377 c00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
DiarrheaQIV-Sub-HD921272.93 (1.94~4.24)0.516 a80.87 (0.38~1.70)0.587 a10.11 (0.00~0.60)>0.999 a
QIV-Sub-LD924323.46 (2.38~4.85)0.329 b60.65 (0.24~1.41)0.995 b10.11 (0.00~0.60)>0.999 b
QIV-Split-LD921404.34 (3.12~5.87)0.106 c60.65 (0.24~1.41)0.592 c10.11 (0.00~0.60)>0.999 c
VomitingQIV-Sub-HD921192.06 (1.25~3.20)0.187 a252.71 (1.76~3.98)0.543 a30.33 (0.07~0.95)0.997 a
QIV-Sub-LD924283.03 (2.02~4.35)0.316 b212.27 (1.41~3.45)0.643 b20.22 (0.03~0.78)>0.999 b
QIV-Split-LD921212.28 (1.42~3.46)0.749 c242.61 (1.68~3.85)0.885 c10.11 (0.00~0.60)0.617 c
ConstipationQIV-Sub-HD92120.22 (0.03~0.78)>0.999 a00.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Sub-LD92430.32 (0.07~0.95)0.619 b00.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Split-LD92110.11 (0.00~0.60)>0.999 c00.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
NauseaQIV-Sub-HD92100.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)>0.999 a10.11 (0.00~0.60)0.499 a
QIV-Sub-LD92400.00 (0.00~0.40)0.249 b10.11 (0.00~0.60)>0.999 b00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Split-LD92120.22 (0.03~0.78)0.479 c00.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)>0.999 c
HeadacheQIV-Sub-HD92100.00 (0.00~0.40)-10.11 (0.00~0.60)0.499 a00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Sub-LD92400.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Split-LD92100.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)>0.999 c00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
DyspneaQIV-Sub-HD92100.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)>0.999 a00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Sub-LD92400.00 (0.00~0.40)-10.11 (0.00~0.60)>0.999 b00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Split-LD92100.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
Local
ErythemaQIV-Sub-HD921171.85 (1.08~2.94)0.216 a40.43 (0.12~1.11)0.132 a00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Sub-LD924252.71 (1.76~3.97)0.340 b00.00 (0.00~0.40)0.499 b00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Split-LD921323.47 (2.39~4.87)0.030 c10.11 (0.00~0.60)0.370 c00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
PainQIV-Sub-HD92100.00 (0.00~0.40)0.500 a00.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Sub-LD92420.22 (0.03~0.78)>0.999 b00.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Split-LD92110.11 (0.00~0.60)>0.999 c00.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
IndurationQIV-Sub-HD92100.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)>0.999 a00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Sub-LD92400.00 (0.00~0.40)0.249 b10.11 (0.00~0.60)>0.999 b00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Split-LD92120.22 (0.03~0.78)0.479 c10.11 (0.00~0.60)>0.999 c00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
SwellingQIV-Sub-HD92100.00 (0.00~0.40)>0.999 a20.22 (0.03~0.78)0.249 a00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Sub-LD92410.11 (0.00~0.60)0.369 b00.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Split-LD92140.43 (0.12~1.11)0.133 c00.00 (0.00~0.40)0.479 c00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
PruritusQIV-Sub-HD92110.11 (0.00~0.60)0.499 a00.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Sub-LD92400.00 (0.00~0.40)-00.00 (0.00~0.40)0.499 b00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Split-LD92100.00 (0.00~0.40)>0.999 c10.11 (0.00~0.60)>0.999 c00.00 (0.00~0.40)-
Note: Data are numbers and rates. The χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the adverse reaction rates among the groups. a QIV-Sub-HD vs. QIV-Sub-LD; b QIV-Sub-LD vs. QIV-Split-LD; c QIV-Sub-HD vs. QIV-Split-LD.
Table 4. Symptomatic adverse reaction rate overview from first vaccination through 30 days following the second vaccination.
Table 4. Symptomatic adverse reaction rate overview from first vaccination through 30 days following the second vaccination.
SymptomGroupnAdverse Reaction Rates (95%CI)p
Systemic
FeverQIV-Sub-HD92115.64 (13.35~18.14)0.676 a
QIV-Sub-LD92414.94 (12.70~17.40)0.051 b
QIV-Split-LD92111.83 (9.82~14.10)0.018 c
CoughQIV-Sub-HD9214.45 (3.21~5.99)0.396 a
QIV-Sub-LD9245.30 (3.95~6.95)0.905 b
QIV-Split-LD9215.43 (4.06~7.09)0.333 c
Runny noseQIV-Sub-HD9217.82 (6.17~9.74)0.055 a
QIV-Sub-LD92410.39 (8.50~12.54)0.018 b
QIV-Split-LD9217.27 (5.68~9.15)0.659 c
DiarrheaQIV-Sub-HD9213.91 (2.75~5.37)0.824 a
QIV-Sub-LD9244.11 (2.93~5.60)0.310 b
QIV-Split-LD9215.10 (3.77~6.73)0.217 c
VomitingQIV-Sub-HD9215.10 (3.77~6.73)0.767 a
QIV-Sub-LD9245.41 (4.04~7.07)0.687 b
QIV-Split-LD9214.99 (3.68~6.61)0.915 c
ConstipationQIV-Sub-HD9210.22 (0.03~0.78)>0.999 a
QIV-Sub-LD9240.32 (0.07~0.95)0.619 b
QIV-Split-LD9210.11 (0.00~0.60)>0.999 c
NauseaQIV-Sub-HD9210.11 (0.00~0.60)>0.999 a
QIV-Sub-LD9240.11 (0.00~0.60)0.998 b
QIV-Split-LD9210.22 (0.03~0.78)>0.999 c
HeadacheQIV-Sub-HD9210.11 (0.00~0.60)0.499 a
QIV-Sub-LD9240.00 (0.00~0.40)-
QIV-Split-LD9210.00 (0.00~0.40)>0.999 c
DyspneaQIV-Sub-HD9210.00 (0.00~0.40)>0.999 a
QIV-Sub-LD9240.11 (0.00~0.60)>0.999 a
QIV-Split-LD9210.00 (0.00~0.40)-
Local
ErythemaQIV-Sub-HD9212.28 (1.42~3.46)0.558 a
QIV-Sub-LD9242.71 (1.76~3.97)0.280 b
QIV-Split-LD9213.58 (2.48~5.00)0.097 c
PainQIV-Sub-HD9210.00 (0.00~0.40)0.500 a
QIV-Sub-LD9240.22 (0.03~0.78)>0.999 b
QIV-Split-LD9210.11 (0.00~0.60)>0.999 c
IndurationQIV-Sub-HD9210.00 (0.00~0.40)>0.999 a
QIV-Sub-LD9240.11 (0.00~0.60)0.614 b
QIV-Split-LD9210.33 (0.07~0.95)0.248 c
SwellingQIV-Sub-HD9210.22 (0.03~0.78)0.998 a
QIV-Sub-LD9240.11 (0.00~0.60)0.369 b
QIV-Split-LD9210.43 (0.12~1.11)0.683 c
PruritusQIV-Sub-HD9210.11 (0.00~0.60)0.499 a
QIV-Sub-LD9240.00 (0.00~0.40)0.499 b
QIV-Split-LD9210.11 (0.00~0.60)>0.999 c
Note: Data are rates (95%CI). The χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the adverse reaction rates among the groups. a QIV-Sub-HD vs. QIV-Sub-LD; b QIV-Sub-LD vs. QIV-Split-LD; c QIV-Sub-HD vs. QIV-Split-LD.
Table 5. Comparison of GMTs and GMFI of antibodies 28 days after full vaccination.
Table 5. Comparison of GMTs and GMFI of antibodies 28 days after full vaccination.
Stage of VaccinationStrainGroupnGMT (95%CI)pGMT Ratio (95%CI)GMFI (95%CI)
Pre-vaccinationH1N1QIV-Sub-HD7945.10 (5.04~5.16)0.232 a--
QIV-Sub-LD7905.16 (5.08~5.24)0.568 b--
QIV-Split-LD7885.13 (5.05~5.20)0.569 c--
H3N2QIV-Sub-HD7948.87 (8.24~9.54)0.784 a--
QIV-Sub-LD7908.74 (8.10~9.42)0.026 b--
QIV-Split-LD7887.80 (7.30~8.33)0.011 c--
BVQIV-Sub-HD7948.35 (7.75~9.00)0.439 a--
QIV-Sub-LD7908.72 (8.06~9.44)0.274 b--
QIV-Split-LD7889.30 (8.56~10.10)0.060 c--
BYQIV-Sub-HD79421.20 (20.12~22.35)0.845 a--
QIV-Sub-LD79021.36 (20.29~22.48)0.265 b--
QIV-Split-LD78822.27 (21.13~23.46)0.195 c--
Post-dose 2H1N1QIV-Sub-HD794351.64 (327.63~377.41)<0.001 a1.29 (1.16~1.44)68.93 (64.17~74.04)
QIV-Sub-LD790272.05 (250.77~295.14)0.005 b1.18 (1.05~1.33)52.72 (48.58~57.22)
QIV-Split-LD788230.09 (211.35~250.48)<0.001 c1.53 (1.37~1.71)44.86 (41.18~48.86)
H3N2QIV-Sub-HD794110.60 (100.70~121.47)0.005 a1.21 (1.06~1.38)12.48 (11.61~13.41)
QIV-Sub-LD79091.41 (83.16~100.49)0.581 b1.04 (0.91~1.18)10.46 (9.70~11.29)
QIV-Split-LD78888.13 (80.59~96.37)0.001 c1.25 (1.10~1.43)11.30 (10.43~12.25)
BVQIV-Sub-HD794149.08 (135.22~164.36)0.057 a1.15 (1.00~1.34)17.84 (16.80~18.96)
QIV-Sub-LD790129.16 (115.57~144.36)0.498 b0.95 (0.82~1.10)14.81 (13.78~15.92)
QIV-Split-LD788136.09 (122.81~150.81)0.207 c1.10 (0.95~1.26)14.64 (13.67~15.67)
BYQIV-Sub-HD794172.47 (158.72~187.43)0.566 a1.04 (0.92~1.17)8.13 (7.52~8.80)
QIV-Sub-LD790166.44 (152.27~181.94)0.117 b1.11 (0.98~1.26)7.79 (7.19~8.44)
QIV-Split-LD788150.45 (137.52~164.58)0.029 c1.15 (1.01~1.30)6.76 (6.24~7.31)
Note: The two-sample independent t-test was used to compare the differences in antibody GMTs. a QIV-Sub-HD vs. QIV-Sub-LD; b QIV-Sub-LD vs. QIV-Split-LD; c QIV-Sub-HD vs. QIV-Split-LD.
Table 6. Comparison of ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40 and SCRs of antibodies 28 days after full vaccination.
Table 6. Comparison of ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40 and SCRs of antibodies 28 days after full vaccination.
Stage of VaccinationStrainGroupnRatio of Antibody Titer ≥ 1:40 (95%CI)pSCRs (95%CI)SCR Rate Differencesp
Pre-vaccinationH1N1QIV-Sub-HD7940.25 (0.03~0.91)0.678 a---
QIV-Sub-LD7900.51 (0.14~1.29)0.685 b---
QIV-Split-LD7880.25 (0.03~0.91)>0.999 c---
H3N2QIV-Sub-HD79419.65 (16.94~22.58)0.888 a---
QIV-Sub-LD79019.37 (16.67~22.30)0.035 b---
QIV-Split-LD78815.36 (12.91~18.06)0.025 c---
BVQIV-Sub-HD79415.74 (13.28~18.47)0.700 a---
QIV-Sub-LD79016.46 (13.94~19.23)0.180 b---
QIV-Split-LD78819.04 (16.35~21.95)0.084 c---
BYQIV-Sub-HD79428.59 (25.47~31.87)0.917 a---
QIV-Sub-LD79028.35 (25.23~31.64)0.160 b---
QIV-Split-LD78831.60 (28.36~34.97)0.192 c---
Post-dose 2H1N1QIV-Sub-HD79498.74 (97.70~99.39)<0.001 a98.74 (97.70~99.39)3.17 (1.56~4.94)<0.001 a
QIV-Sub-LD79095.57 (93.89~96.89)0.023 b95.57 (93.89~96.89)2.68 (0.37~5.03)0.023 b
QIV-Split-LD78892.89 (90.87~94.59)<0.001 c92.89 (90.87~94.59)5.85 (3.89~7.80)<0.001 c
H3N2QIV-Sub-HD79486.40 (83.82~88.71)0.007 a84.01 (81.27~86.49)5.27 (1.44~9.09)0.007 a
QIV-Sub-LD79081.39 (78.50~84.05)0.968 b78.73 (75.71~81.54)1.32 (−2.76~5.40)0.525 b
QIV-Split-LD78881.47 (78.58~84.13)0.008 c77.41 (74.33~80.29)6.59 (2.72~10.47)0.001 c
BVQIV-Sub-HD79493.45 (91.50~95.07)<0.001 a93.32 (91.36~94.96)5.60 (2.73~8.51)<0.001 a
QIV-Sub-LD79087.85 (85.36~90.05)0.831 b87.72 (85.23~89.93)0.67 (−2.62~3.95)0.690 b
QIV-Split-LD78888.20 (85.74~90.37)<0.001 c87.06 (84.51~89.32)6.27 (3.35~9.19)<0.001 c
BYQIV-Sub-HD79497.10 (95.69~98.16)0.168 a82.87 (80.07~85.43)1.73 (−2.05~5.52)0.369 a
QIV-Sub-LD79095.82 (94.18~97.11)0.992 b81.14 (78.23~83.81)5.25 (1.20~9.29)0.011 b
QIV-Split-LD78895.81 (94.17~97.10)0.165 c75.89 (72.74~78.84)6.98 (3.01~10.96)0.001 c
Note: The χ2 test, corrected χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the differences in the ratio of antibody titers ≥1:40 or SCRs. a QIV-Sub-HD vs. QIV-Sub-LD; b QIV-Sub-LD vs. QIV-Split-LD; c QIV-Sub-HD vs. QIV-Split-LD.
Table 7. Comparison of GMTs and GMFI of antibodies 3 months and 6 months after full vaccination.
Table 7. Comparison of GMTs and GMFI of antibodies 3 months and 6 months after full vaccination.
Stage of VaccinationStrainGroupnGMT (95%CI)pGMT Ratio (95%CI)GMFI (95%CI)
3 months Post-dose 2H1N1QIV-Sub-HD169114.77 (97.96~134.46)0.022 a1.32 (1.04~1.67)22.58 (19.27~26.46)
QIV-Sub-LD18386.95 (72.71~103.98)0.743 b0.96 (0.75~1.23)16.94 (14.15~20.27)
QIV-Split-LD18890.68 (75.87~108.39)0.052 c1.27 (1.00~1.61)17.94 (15.01~21.44)
H3N2QIV-Sub-HD16943.96 (35.39~54.59)0.153 a1.24 (0.92~1.67)6.82 (5.75~8.09)
QIV-Sub-LD18335.43 (28.92~43.41)0.044 b0.74 (0.56~0.99)5.48 (4.68~6.41)
QIV-Split-LD18847.57 (38.82~58.29)0.600 c0.92 (0.69~1.24)6.68 (5.73~7.78)
BVQIV-Sub-HD16974.92 (61.42~91.38)0.487 a1.11 (0.83~1.47)10.49 (9.25~11.89)
QIV-Sub-LD18367.72 (55.16~83.14)0.871 b0.98 (0.74~1.29)9.24 (8.12~10.51)
QIV-Split-LD18869.29 (57.39~83.64)0.573 c1.08 (0.82~1.42)8.87 (7.88~9.99)
BYQIV-Sub-HD16972.20 (62.34~83.63)0.203 a1.15 (0.93~1.43)6.36 (5.34~7.57)
QIV-Sub-LD18362.78 (53.61~73.51)0.641 b1.05 (0.84~1.32)5.19 (4.42~6.11)
QIV-Split-LD18859.57 (50.94~69.65)0.080 c1.21 (0.98~1.50)4.81 (4.13~5.60)
6 months Post-dose 2H1N1QIV-Sub-HD16358.65 (49.68~69.24)0.042 a1.30 (1.01~1.67)11.58 (9.82~13.66)
QIV-Sub-LD17745.16 (37.33~54.64)0.838 b0.97 (0.74~1.27)8.79 (7.27~10.63)
QIV-Split-LD18146.44 (38.40~56.18)0.069 c1.26 (0.98~1.62)9.25 (7.65~11.19)
H3N2QIV-Sub-HD16326.93 (21.39~33.91)0.113 a1.29 (0.94~1.78)4.14 (3.46~4.95)
QIV-Sub-LD17720.80 (16.63~26.01)0.100 b0.77 (0.57~1.05)3.21 (2.70~3.82)
QIV-Split-LD18126.86 (21.80~33.09)0.986 c1.00 (0.74~1.37)3.76 (3.24~4.38)
BVQIV-Sub-HD16347.62 (38.50~58.90)0.394 a1.14 (0.84~1.56)6.58 (5.75~7.52)
QIV-Sub-LD17741.60 (33.13~52.22)0.772 b0.96 (0.70~1.30)5.62 (4.83~6.55)
QIV-Split-LD18143.52 (35.42~53.46)0.549 c1.09 (0.81~1.47)5.50 (4.88~6.19)
BYQIV-Sub-HD16352.29 (45.29~60.36)0.709 a1.04 (0.84~1.29)4.64 (3.92~5.49)
QIV-Sub-LD17750.20 (42.82~58.85)0.649 b1.05 (0.84~1.31)4.16 (3.53~4.90)
QIV-Split-LD18147.71 (40.92~55.62)0.392 c1.10 (0.89~1.35)3.83 (3.31~4.45)
Note: The two-sample independent t-test was used to compare the differences in antibody GMTs. a QIV-Sub-HD vs. QIV-Sub-LD; b QIV-Sub-LD vs. QIV-Split-LD; c QIV-Sub-HD vs. QIV-Split-LD.
Table 8. Comparison of ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40 and SCRs of antibodies 3 months and 6 months after full vaccination.
Table 8. Comparison of ratio of antibody titer ≥ 1:40 and SCRs of antibodies 3 months and 6 months after full vaccination.
Stage of VaccinationStrainGroupnThe Ratio of Antibody Titer ≥ 1:40 (95%CI)pSCRs (95%CI)SCR Rate Differences (95%CI)p
3 months Post-dose 2H1N1QIV-Sub-HD16990.53 (85.08~94.49)0.039 a90.53 (85.08~94.49)8.02 (0.81~15.13)0.029 a
QIV-Sub-LD18383.06 (76.83~88.19)0.191 b82.51 (76.22~87.72)4.85 (−3.31~12.92)0.242 b
QIV-Split-LD18877.66 (71.03~83.40)0.001 c77.66 (71.03~83.40)12.87 (5.46~20.28)0.001 c
H3N2QIV-Sub-HD16959.17 (51.36~66.66)0.657 a58.58 (50.76~66.09)1.75 (−8.51~11.93)0.740 a
QIV-Sub-LD18356.83 (49.32~64.12)0.905 b56.83 (49.32~64.12)0.45 (−9.55~10.43)0.931 b
QIV-Split-LD18857.45 (50.04~64.61)0.741 c56.38 (48.98~63.59)2.20 (−8.07~12.46)0.675 c
BVQIV-Sub-HD16982.84 (76.29~88.20)0.633 a82.84 (76.29~88.20)1.97 (−6.18~9.98)0.633 a
QIV-Sub-LD18380.87 (74.42~86.30)0.314 b80.87 (74.42~86.30)4.28 (−4.08~12.54)0.314 b
QIV-Split-LD18876.60 (69.88~82.45)0.144 c76.60 (69.88~82.45)6.24 (−2.06~14.55)0.144 c
BYQIV-Sub-HD16992.31 (87.21~95.84)0.478 a73.96 (66.67~80.40)6.20 (−3.32~15.50)0.201 a
QIV-Sub-LD18390.16 (84.90~94.07)0.031 b67.76 (60.47~74.47)6.06 (−3.65~15.59)0.222 b
QIV-Split-LD18882.45 (76.24~87.60)0.005 c61.70 (54.35~68.68)12.26 (2.67~21.86)0.014 c
6 months Post-dose 2H1N1QIV-Sub-HD16377.30 (70.10~83.49)0.017 a77.30 (70.10~83.49)11.76 (2.13~21.03)0.017 a
QIV-Sub-LD17765.54 (58.04~72.51)0.350 b65.54 (58.04~72.51)4.76 (−5.20~14.58)0.350 b
QIV-Split-LD18160.77 (53.26~67.93)0.001 c60.77 (53.26~67.93)16.53 (6.94~26.12)0.001 c
H3N2QIV-Sub-HD16345.40 (37.60~53.37)0.505 a44.79 (37.00~52.76)4.11 (−6.35~14.46)0.444 a
QIV-Sub-LD17741.81 (34.45~49.44)0.696 b40.68 (33.37~48.30)3.11 (−6.94~13.08)0.547 b
QIV-Split-LD18139.78 (32.59~47.31)0.292 c37.57 (30.49~45.06)7.22 (−3.18~17.61)0.174 c
BVQIV-Sub-HD16361.35 (53.42~68.86)0.422 a60.74 (52.79~68.28)4.80 (−5.65~15.08)0.370 a
QIV-Sub-LD17757.06 (49.42~64.46)0.509 b55.93 (48.29~63.37)3.45 (−6.82~13.60)0.513 b
QIV-Split-LD18153.59 (46.04~61.02)0.146 c52.49 (44.95~59.94)8.25 (−2.20~18.70)0.123 c
BYQIV-Sub-HD16386.50 (80.28~91.34)0.122 a59.51 (51.55~67.12)2.45 (−7.98~12.77)0.648 a
QIV-Sub-LD17780.23 (73.59~85.82)0.589 b57.06 (49.42~64.46)1.81 (−8.39~11.96)0.730 b
QIV-Split-LD18177.90 (71.15~83.72)0.038 c55.25 (47.69~62.63)4.26 (−6.19~14.71)0.425 c
Note: The χ2 test, corrected χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the differences in the ratio of antibody titers ≥1:40 or SCRs a QIV-Sub-HD vs. QIV-Sub-LD; b QIV-Sub-LD vs. QIV-Split-LD; c QIV-Sub-HD vs. QIV-Split-LD.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, L.; Li, G.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wang, K.; Jia, C.; Zhang, W.; Tan, J.; Chen, X.; Li, Q.; et al. The Safety and Immunogenicity of a Quadrivalent Influenza Subunit Vaccine in Healthy Children Aged 6–35 Months: A Randomized, Blinded and Positive-Controlled Phase III Clinical Trial. Vaccines 2025, 13, 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050467

AMA Style

Huang L, Li G, Zhang Y, Zhao X, Wang K, Jia C, Zhang W, Tan J, Chen X, Li Q, et al. The Safety and Immunogenicity of a Quadrivalent Influenza Subunit Vaccine in Healthy Children Aged 6–35 Months: A Randomized, Blinded and Positive-Controlled Phase III Clinical Trial. Vaccines. 2025; 13(5):467. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050467

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Lili, Guangfu Li, Yuhui Zhang, Xue Zhao, Kai Wang, Chunyu Jia, Wei Zhang, Jiebing Tan, Xiaofen Chen, Qin Li, and et al. 2025. "The Safety and Immunogenicity of a Quadrivalent Influenza Subunit Vaccine in Healthy Children Aged 6–35 Months: A Randomized, Blinded and Positive-Controlled Phase III Clinical Trial" Vaccines 13, no. 5: 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050467

APA Style

Huang, L., Li, G., Zhang, Y., Zhao, X., Wang, K., Jia, C., Zhang, W., Tan, J., Chen, X., Li, Q., Jiang, H., An, R., Leng, W., Yang, Y., An, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2025). The Safety and Immunogenicity of a Quadrivalent Influenza Subunit Vaccine in Healthy Children Aged 6–35 Months: A Randomized, Blinded and Positive-Controlled Phase III Clinical Trial. Vaccines, 13(5), 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050467

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop