Next Article in Journal
Adjuvant Activity of CpG-Oligonucleotide Administered Transcutaneously in Combination with Vaccination Using a Self-Dissolving Microneedle Patch in Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Antibody Response to Heterologous Prime–Boost Vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2: An Observational Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Local and Systemic Adverse Reactions to mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Comparing Two Vaccine Types and Occurrence of Previous COVID-19 Infection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Vaccines
Volume 9
Issue 12
10.3390/vaccines9121479
vaccines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Construction of Recombinant Lactococcus lactis Strain Expressing VP1 Fusion Protein of Duck Hepatitis A Virus Type 1 and Evaluation of Its Immune Effect

by
Xiaoting Zhang
1,2,
Ruihua Zhang
1,3,
Jingyu Wang
1,3,
Nana Sui
1,3,
Guige Xu
1,3,
Hui Yan
1,3,
Yanli Zhu
1,3,
Zhijing Xie
1,3 and
Shijin Jiang
1,3,*
1
Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China
2
Shandong Key Laboratory of Animal Microecological Preparations, Taian 271000, China
3
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, Taian 271000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2021, 9(12), 1479; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9121479
Submission received: 21 October 2021 / Revised: 19 November 2021 / Accepted: 10 December 2021 / Published: 14 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recombinant Vaccines Produced in Emerging Expression Systems for Human and Animal Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
With the continuous development of duck farming and the increasing breeding density, the incidence of duck hepatitis A virus type 1 (DHAV-1) has been on the rise, seriously endangering the development of duck farming. To reduce the use of antibiotics in duck breeding, susceptibility risks and mortality, and avoid virulence recovery and immune failure risk, this study aims to develop a new type of mucosal immune probiotics and make full use of molecular biology techniques, on the level of genetic engineering, to modify Lactococcus lactis (L. lactis). In this study, a secretory recombinant L. lactis named MG1363-VP1 with an enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein (eGFP) and translation enhancer T7g10L was constructed, which could express the VP1-eGFP fusion protein of DHAV-1. The animal experiment in ducklings was performed to detect the immune response and protection effect of oral microecologics by recombinant L. lactis. The results showed that oral L. lactis MG1363-VP1 significantly induced the body’s humoral immune system and mucosal immune system to produce specific anti-VP1 IgG antibodies and mucosal secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) for DHAV-1 in ducklings, and cytokines including interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and interferon gamma (IFN-γ). The mortality rate was monitored simultaneously by the natural infestation in the process of production and breeding; notably, the ducklings vaccinated with L. lactis MG1363-VP1 were effectively protected against the nature infection of DHAV-1. The recombinant L. lactis MG1363-VP1 constructed in this study provides a new means of preventing and controlling DHAV-1 infection in the future.

1. Introduction

Duck virus hepatitis (DVH) is a highly fatal and rapidly spreading contagious disease in ducklings that is mainly caused by duck hepatitis virus (DHV). The three DHV types are all RNA viruses: duck hepatitis A virus (DHAV), duck astrovirus type 1 (DAstV-1), and duck astrovirus type 2 (DAstV-2), respectively [1]. The DHAV is genetically divided into three serotypes: DHAV type 1 (DHAV-1), type 2 (DHAV-2), and type 3 (DHAV-3) [2,3,4,5]. DHAV-1 is common and widely distributed in ducks, especially ducklings < 3 weeks old, as it can cause 100% morbidity. The typical pathological changes are liver hemorrhage and swelling [6]. DHAV-1 belongs to the genus Avihepatovirus of the family Picornaviridae [7]. The capsid protein of the virus encapsulates the main genetic material, the capsid proteins of DHAV-1 include VP0, VP1, and VP3. VP1 was considered the external and dominant antigen with several conserved linear epitopes. VP1 protein has the highest genetic diversity amongst the different isolates and can induce neutralizing antibodies in ducks [8].
The mucosal immune system is an important part of the body’s immune system, which plays an important role in resisting infection. Most pathogens enter the body through mucosal surfaces, and the development of a vaccine that is protective at such sites should be very effective. The mucosal tissue of the gastrointestinal tract is the main place for local specific mucosal immunity [9]. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) play a key role in maintaining the intestinal balance [10]. LAB have proved to be effective mucosal delivery vehicles that overcome the problem of delivering functional proteins to the mucosal tissues [11]. LAB live carrier immune microecological preparation has the following advantages: it can stimulate the body’s mucosal immune system and activate mucosal immune response. Compared with the traditional intramuscular injection of vaccines, it can reduce the stress reaction of animals. As an antigen, the foreign protein expressed by LAB can increase specific IgG antibodies, which can neutralize pathogens and delay infection. Several delivery systems have been developed to target heterologous proteins to a specific cell location (cytoplasm, cell wall, or extracellular medium) and, more recently, to efficiently transfer DNA to eukaryotic cells [12]. At present, a variety of exogenous proteins have been successfully constructed and expressed in LAB. Mucosal immune probiotics have attracted increasing attention.
As a food-grade LAB, Lactococcus lactis (L. lactis) has been extensively used as a delivery vehicle for oral vaccines. In this study, we constructed a continuous secretory expression system with L. lactis. The recombinant L. lactis MG1363-VP1, which could express the recombinant protein of DHAV-1/VP1, can be used as an oral vaccine for prevention and control of DHAV-1 infection.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strain and Vector

The DHAV-1 strain LY0801 (accession no. FJ436047), pR-DHAV-1 infectious clone and 4F8 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) were all made in our previous work [13]. The plasmid pMG36e and L. lactis strain MG1363 were purchased from BIO SCI BIO (Hangzhou, China). The Escherichia coli (E. coli) DH5α competent cells was purchased from TaKaRa (Dalian, China). The plasmids pMD18-T and pEGFP-C3 were purchased from TransGen Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).

2.2. Main Reagents and Antibodies

The 2 × Phanta Master Mix and Clone Express II One Step Cloning Kit were purchased from Nanjing Vazyme biotech Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). The PurePlasmid Mini Kit and Gel Extraction Kit were both purchased from Beijing Cowin Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The dialysis bag and lysozyme were purchased from Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The Express Cast PAGE, 5 × SDS-PAGE Loading Buffer and Ncm Ecl Ultra were purchased from New Cell Molecular Biotech. The enhanced HRP-DAB Chromogenic Kit was purchased from Tiangen biotech. The HRP conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG was purchased from Sigma. The HRP-conjugated goat anti-duck IgG was purchased from KPL (Gaithersburg, MD, USA). The DHAV-1 egg yolk antibody named as Yagankang was purchased from Tianjin Ringpu Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China), and the neutralizing antibody titers of the antibody against DHAV-1 was higher than the titer of 1: 512. The duck IL-2 enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit, sIgA ELISA kit, IFN-γ ELISA kit, IL-4 ELISA kit, and IL-10 ELISA kit were all purchased from Shanghai MLbio Biotechnology Co., Ltd. The L. lactis MG1363 was cultured in M17 medium supplemented with 0.5% glucose (GM17, Haibo, Qingdao, China). The erythromycin was purchased from Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China), the working concentration of which was 200 μg/mL in DH5α and 2 μg/mL in L. lactis.

2.3. Expression Plasmid Construction in E. coli

The primers used in this study are listed in Table 1. Using plasmid pR-DHAV-1 as template, the first fragment of 781 bp was amplified with primers Usp45-VP1-F1/VP1-R. The second fragment of 818 bp, with an 81 bp signal peptide, was amplified using the first fragment as template with primers Usp45-VP1-F2/VP1-R. Using gel extract production in the second step as the template and T7g10L-F/VP1-R as primers, an 840 bp fusion gene T7g10L-Usp45-VP1 with homologous arm of eGFP was obtained. Using plasmid pEGFP-C3 as template, a fragment of 816 bp with homologous arm of VP1 was amplified with primers eGFP-F/eGFP-R. The T7g10L-Usp45-VP1 and eGFP were fused together with primers T7g10L-F/eGFP-R and linked to the vector pMD18-T to be sequenced. Then, the homologous arm of vector pMG36e was added to the T7g10L-Usp45-VP1-eGFP with primers F’/ R’ and the final 1612 bp fragment was inserted to plasmid pMG36e with the restriction enzyme Xba I and Hind III. The recombinant plasmid was transformed into the E. coli DH5α competent cells, and the positive clones were sequenced by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) (Figure 1).

2.4. Construction of Recombinant L. lactis MG1363-VP1

The competent cells of L. lactis MG1363 were prepared in advance. The Usp45-VP1-eGFP-pMG36e positive plasmid was transferred into the competent cells by electroporation technology [14], and the cells were cultured in GM17 agar medium containing erythromycin at a concentration of 1 μg/mL. The recombinant plasmids were extracted and identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and enzyme digestion. The positive plasmid was transformed into the L. lactis MG1363 for the second time. According to the 16S rRNA specific sequence of L. lactis MG1363 published in GenBank, a pair of specific primers was designed (Table 1). The L. lactis strain was identified by Gram staining and the 16S rRNA sequencing. The positive recombinant MG1363 strain contain Usp45-VP1-eGFP-pMG36e, renamed as MG1363/VP1. At the same time, the empty vector pMG36e was electroporated into L. lactis MG1363 (renamed as MG1363/pMG36e) as a negative control.

2.5. Fluorescence Microscopy

An appropriate amount of recombinant L. lactis solution was taken on sterile slides, dried, and then covered with glass slides for observation under the Nikon upright fluorescence microscope 55i (Nikon, Japan).

2.6. Western Blot Analysis

The recombinant L. lactis MG1363/VP1 and MG1363/pMG36e were grown in GM17 without erythromycin and cultured at 37 °C for 10–16 h. The culture supernatant and the bacterial pellet sedimentation were separated by centrifugation at 12000 rpm for 5 min.
The supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm pore size membrane and concentrated by ammonium sulfate precipitation (50%) in dialysis bag. The obtained protein precipitation was washed by bacterial lysis buffer. The intracellular protein was purified as follows: the bacteria pellets were washed by adding 1/10 volume of bacterial lysis buffer and lysozyme (20 mg/mL). After being incubated at 37 °C for 60 min, the pellets were broken by ultrasound under ice bath conditions with a 100 W power. The ultrasonication procedure was 45 cycles of ultrasound for 5 s and interval for 8 s. After ultrasound, the supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 12000 rpm for 10 min. The inclusion protein was purified as follows: the sedimentation was washed with washing buffer (50 mM/L Tris-HCl, 100 mM/L NaCl, 10 mM/L EDTA, 0.5% Triton X-100) at different urea concentrations (0 M, 2 M, 4 M, 8 M) successively.
A following Western blot assay was designed to detect if the protein existed in the supernatant or intracellular. The DHAV monoclonal antibody 4F8 and the HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Sigma, 1:4000) were respectively used as the primary antibody and secondary antibody to detect the DHAV-1 VP1 protein as described previously [12].

2.7. Intestinal Colonization of Recombinant L. lactis

A total of 10 one-day-old cherry valley ducklings were bought from Jingwei husbandry company and were orally immunized with the recombinant L. lactis MG1363/VP1 at three or four days of age. Each duckling was orally immunized by one milliliter (1 × 109 CFU/mL) and slaughtered at 15 days. Smears were randomly sampled from each segment of the intestinal mucosal epithelium for the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, colon, and observed under a fluorescent microscope with a cover glass.

2.8. Oral Vaccination of Ducklings

A total of 130 one-day-old cherry valley ducklings were bought from Jingwei husbandry company, Taian city. Five one-day-old ducklings were randomly slaughtered to collect serum and intestine samples. The remaining ducklings were divided into four groups, named group I (33 ducklings), group II (33 ducklings), group III (41 ducklings), and group IV (18 ducklings). Ducklings in group I and group II were orally immunized with L. lactis MG1363-VP1 and L. lactis MG1363-pMG36e, respectively, from day 1 to day 6. Each duckling in the two groups was orally immunized with 1 mL (1 × 109 CFU/mL). The five ducklings were randomly slaughtered at 3, 5, and 7 days, after 48 h, 96 h, and 134 h of oral immunization, to collected serum and duodenum. Group III were given food and water only as a blank control group and were also slaughtered at the same time. Ducklings in group IV only received food and water and were then injected with egg-yolk antibodies (1 mL/duckling) at 7th day. Finally, on the day 7, 8 ducklings were randomly selected from group III to infect with DHAV-1 (strain LY0801) through the eyes and nose (0.3 mL/duckling; 2 × 104 copies). Next, each group was put in 2 ducklings infected with DHAV-1 to mimic natural infection (Figure 2). From day 8, the surviving number of ducklings in each group was recorded.

2.9. Detection of Cytokines and Specific Antibody in Ducklings

The 96-well plate was coated with purified VP1-eGFP protein, and the optimal dilution concentration and dilution ratio of protein were determined in advance using the Dot Matrix method. Finally, the optimal protein coating concentration was 7.5 μg/mL; the 96-well plate is coated with this concentration, 100 μL/well, incubated at 4 °C overnight. HRP-conjugated goat anti-duck IgG (KPL, 1:5000 dilution) was used to detect duck blood serum. The intestine fluids of ducklings were examined by sIgA commercial ELISA kit. The cytokines IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, and IFN-γ in blood-serum samples were detected using commercial ELISA kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

3. Results

3.1. Construction of Recombinant Plasmid Usp45-VP1-eGFP-pMG36e

The full length of the plasmid Usp45-VP1-eGFP-pMG36e was 5204 bp; the restriction site Sac I was found at 1566 bp and 2692 bp. The suitable restriction site Sac I in the plasmid was selected for single restriction. After digestion, two bands of about 3633 bp and 1571 bp were obtained. The plasmid was confirmed to have no amino acid mutations after sequencing.

3.2. Construction of Recombinant L. lactis MG1363-VP1

The recombinant plasmid Usp45-VP1-eGFP-pMG36e was introduced into L. lactis MG1363 competent cell by the electro-transfer method. The conditions were a pulse of 25 μf, voltage of 2200 V, and resistance of 200 Ω. The positive recombinant L. lactis was screened in GM17 medium containing erythromycin. Single-colony strains were selected in culture. Fluorescence microscope showed that the recombinant L. lactis was positive (Figure 3).
We used Western blotting to detect the VP1-eGFP protein expression, using L. lactis MG1363-pMG36e as the negative control. The target protein in cells can be detected after 10–16 h culture. The protein exists in supernatant and intracellular, the intracellular protein exists in two forms, the soluble protein and insoluble protein (Figure 4).

3.3. Immune Response and Protection Effect in Ducklings after Oral Immunization

The IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IFN-γ, total sIgA, and anti-VP1 antibody were detected at 3, 5, and 7 days. One-way analysis of variance multiple range test in GraphPad prism5 was used to analyze data. Statistical significance of p-values < 0.05 was set (Figure 5). The concentrations of IgG, sIgA, IL-2, IL-4, and IFN-γ in ducklings of MG1363-VP1 were significantly higher than those in ducklings of MG1363-pMG36e and the blank control group on days 5–7. The concentration of IL-10 in MG1363-VP1 group rose to the peak at the third day; it then went down and rose again.
The infection period in this study mimicked the natural infection for 15 days. All ducklings in the blank control group died on the fourth day after infection; the final mortality rate reached 100%. At the same time, the ducklings that were orally immunized with L. lactis MG1363-pMG36e died faster after infection; there were 13 deaths in 4 days, and the final survival rate was 27% (5/18). Different from the blank control group, the MG1363-pMG36 control group is partially protective. The ducklings that were orally immunized with L. lactis MG1363-VP1 no longer died after 6 days of infection, and the final protection rate was 55% (10/18). In the egg-yolk antibodies group, only two ducklings died within 4 days after infection, and there was no death thereafter, the final survival rate was 72% (13/18) (Figure 6).

3.4. The Intestinal Colonization of L. lactis

Under fluorescence microscope, the L. lactis could be found in each segment of the intestine (Figure 7). The L. lactis colonization test proved that L. lactis could colonize in the intestine for at least 15 days.

4. Discussion

DHAV-1 cause high mortality in ducklings and pose a serious threat to duck farming. At present, the prevention and control of the disease mainly depend on live attenuated vaccines. However, to reduce the cost of breeding, the farms only use yolk antibody for emergency immunization when the duck population is found to be infected. Although a high protection rate can be obtained, a great deal of time and labor is wasted. It can also lead to immune failure. The use of LAB as a safe and efficient cell factory to produce heterologous proteins is of medical interest [15,16,17,18]. The use of a LAB strain in clinical trials in humans to alleviate inflammatory bowel diseases has opened the possibility of using LAB to target other diseases [19]. L. lactis strain MG1363 is recognized as a non-pathogenic, safe-grade food microorganism that can express foreign antigens [20], so we selected it in this study. In our earlier study, we constructed a recombinant L. lactis that could express a recombinant protein of DHAV-3/VP1 relying on the nisin-controlled inducible expression system [21]. However, the LAB-induced expression system needs to add nisin inducers to express the target protein. After the bacteria were lysed, the antigen protein is released. To avoid excessive accumulation and degradation of the target protein in the cell and maximize the secretion of recombinant protein into the extracellular space, the native signal peptide from a major secreted lactococcal proteins, Usp45, is used [22]. This study optimized the LAB expression system on this basis and selected the E. coli-LAB shuttle expression vector pMG36e. Under the control of native strong constitutive promoter P32, a signal peptide of the major secreted protein of L. lactis, Usp45 is fused to the N-terminus of the target protein VP1. This signal peptide has been confirmed in almost all secreted expression of LAB [23,24,25]. Studies into its secretion mechanism have shown that the precursor protein containing the signal peptide (SP) is formed first, and then the signal peptide is cleaved off by the cleaved enzyme during the process of passing through the cell membrane, and the mature protein is released [26]. We verified that the recombinant L. lactis not only expresses foreign proteins successfully, but also secretes the proteins into the supernatant; the protein exists as soluble and insoluble forms in the cell. We speculated that due to the introduction of the translation enhancer T7g10L, some intracellular proteins exist in the form of inclusion bodies. T7g10L is the leader sequence of gene 10 from the T7 phage, which has an obvious effect, promoting gene translation [27,28]. There are precedents in the application of LAB expression vectors [29,30]. The biological activity of the strain can be detected in each segment of the intestine after oral immunization for a period. We speculate that the recombinant strain can tolerate the environment of the duck’s gastrointestinal tract and can adhere and colonize the intestine for a period. Without erythromycin selection pressure, the stability rate of the expression vector pMG36e in L. lactis MG1363 was 96–100% [31]. Therefore, the recombinant L. lactis can be used in fermentation production without adding antibiotics, which has a certain practical value.
LAB has Toll-like receptor agonists, which can stimulate and activate immune cells, thereby enhancing antigen-specific immune response [32,33]. Toll-like receptor activates dendritic cells by transducing intracellular signals and the associated recognition of extracellular proteins and the information they carry to dendritic cells, providing acquired immuno-stimulatory signals, and then inducing the production of some pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-12 and IFN-γ [34]. As a vaccine carrier, LAB does not have the pro-inflammatory factor-lipopolysaccharide of Gram-negative bacteria, nor does it produce a variety of miscellaneous proteins [35,36]. It mainly induces Th1 type immune response [37]. IL-2 and IFN-γ cytokines are associated with Th1 cell subpopulation and mediate cellular immunity. IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and other cytokines are associated with Th2 cell subsets and mediate humoral immunity [38]. The results of animal immunoassay showed that the recombinant LAB microprobiotics with duck hepatitis A virus VP1 protein could significantly increase the content of cytokines in animal serum. Through the detection of various cytokines and specific antibodies through animal experiments, it was found that the LAB has good immunogenicity, and there are significant differences between each group of data. It activates the intestinal mucosal immune system and induces humoral and cellular immunity. What interests us is that the changing trends of IL-10 are different from other cytokines. IL-10, produced by a wide variety of cells, is a highly pleiotropic cytokine. Induction of IL-10 often occurs together with pro-inflammatory cytokines, although the pathways that induce IL-10 may negatively regulate these pro-inflammatory cytokines [39]. As the probiotic, L. lactis itself can improve the body’s resistance but usually not produce a strong immune response. Moreover, the IFN-γ concentration in MG1363-pMG36e immunized ducklings were higher than the non-immunized ducklings in Figure 5. Due to immunological effect of IFN-γ, some ducklings with relatively high concentration were protected from DHAV-1 infection during the susceptibility period. To date, LAB oral immune microecological immune preparations have received extensive attention and recognition. The DHAV-1 recombinant L. lactis with fluorescent groups constructed in this study has good biological activity and lays the foundation for subsequent in-depth research.

5. Conclusions

In summary, a recombinant L. lactis MG1363-VP1 was successfully constructed in this study, and it was proved that the fusion protein could be successfully continuously expressed in the recombinant L. lactis without induction. After the oral immunization, specific antibodies can be detected in ducklings, and the protection rate can reach 50% after DHAV-1 virulent infections.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.J. and X.Z.; methodology, R.Z., N.S. and J.W.; resources, X.Z.; data curation, X.Z., G.X. and J.W.; investigation, X.Z., R.Z., J.W. and H.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Z. and J.W.; writing—review and editing, S.J. and R.Z.; visualization, X.Z. and Z.X.; supervision, S.J.; project administration, S.J. and Y.Z.; funding acquisition, S.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (ZR2020QC015), Science and Technology Innovation Major Project of Taian, China (2021ZDZX032), Shandong Modern Agricultural Technology and Industry System, China (SDAIT-11-15).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines issued by Shandong Agricultural University Animal Care and Use Committee (Approval Number: # SDAUA-2020-006).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Bosch, A.; Guix, S.; Krishna, N.K.; Méndez, E.; Monroe, S.S.; Pantin-Jackwood, M.; Schultz-Cherry, S. Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses: Ninth Report of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses; Ninth Report of the ICTV; Elsevier Academic Press: London, UK, 2011; pp. 953–959. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kim, M.C.; Kwon, Y.K.; Joh, S.J.; Lindberg, A.M.; Kwon, J.H.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, S.J. Molecular analysis of duck hepatitis virus type 1 reveals a novel lineage close to the genus Parechovirus in the family Picornaviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2006, 87, 3307–3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kim, M.C.; Kwon, Y.K.; Joh, S.J.; Kim, S.J.; Tolf, C.; Kim, J.H.; Sung, H.W.; Lindberg, A.M.; Kwon, J.H. Recent Korean isolates of duck hepatitis virus reveal the presence of a new geno- and serotype when compared to duck hepatitis virus type 1 type strains. Arch. Virol. 2007, 152, 2059–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fu, Y.; Pan, M.; Wang, X.; Xu, Y.; Yang, H.; Zhang, D. Molecular detection and typing of duck hepatitis A virus directly from clinical specimens. Vet. Microbiol. 2008, 131, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ding, C.; Zhang, D. Molecular analysis of duck hepatitis virus type 1. Virology 2007, 361, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Jin, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, W.; Gu, C.; Cheng, G.; Hu, X. Identification and molecular analysis of the highly pathogenic duck hepatitis virus type 1 in Hubei province of China. Res. Vet. Sci. 2008, 85, 595–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tseng, C.H.; Knowles, N.J.; Tsai, H.J. Molecular analysis of duck hepatitis virus type 1 indicates that it should be assigned to a new genus. Virus Res. 2007, 123, 190–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gao, J.; Chen, J.; Si, X.; Xie, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, S.; Jiang, S. Genetic variation of the VP1 gene of the virulent duck hepatitis A virus type 1 (DHAV-1) isolates in Shandong province of China. Virol. Sin. 2012, 27, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alonso, C.; Vicario, M.; Pigrau, M.; Lobo, B.; Santos, J. Intestinal barrier function and the brain-gut axis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014, 817, 73–113. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Maldonado Galdeano, C.; Cazorla, S.I.; Lemme Dumit, J.M.; Vélez, E.; Perdigón, G. Beneficial effects of probiotic consumption on the immune system. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2019, 74, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wells, J. Mucosal vaccination and therapy with genetically modified lactic acid bacteria. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 2, 423–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pontes, D.S.; de Azevedo, M.S.; Chatel, J.M.; Langella, P.; Azevedo, V.; Miyoshi, A. Lactococcus lactis as a live vector: Heterologous protein production and DNA delivery systems. Protein Expr. Purif. 2011, 79, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, R.; Zhou, G.; Xin, Y.; Chen, J.; Lin, S.; Tian, Y.; Xie, Z.; Jiang, S. Identification of a conserved neutralizing linear B-cell epitope in the VP1 proteins of duck hepatitis A virus type 1 and 3. Vet. Microbiol. 2015, 180, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wells, J.M.; Wilson, P.W.; Le Page, R.W. Improved cloning vectors and transformation procedure for Lactococcus lactis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1993, 74, 629–636. [Google Scholar]
  15. Morello, E.; Bermudez-Humaran, L.G.; Llull, D.; Sole, V.; Miraglio, N.; Langella, P.; Poquet, I. Lactococcus lactis, an efficient cell factory for recombinant protein production and secretion. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 14, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, G.; Yang, Z.; Cao, C.; Xiao, X.; Huang, Y.; Tian, L.; Bai, W. Subacute safety assessment of recombinant Lactococcus lactis on the gut microbiota of male Sprague-Dawley rats. J. Sci Food Agric. 2021, 101, 5807–5812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rezaei, M.; Rabbani Khorasgani, M.; Zarkesh Esfahani, S.H.; Emamzadeh, R.; Abtahi, H. Production of Brucella melitensis Omp16 protein fused to the human interleukin 2 in Lactococcus lactis MG1363 toward developing a Lactococcus-based vaccine against brucellosis. Can. J. Microbiol. 2020, 66, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Steidler, L.; Hans, W.; Schotte, L.; Neirynck, S.; Obermeier, F.; Falk, W.; Fiers, W.; Remaut, E. Treatment of murine colitis by Lactococcus lactis secreting interleukin-10. Science 2000, 289, 1352–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Villatoro-Hernández, J.; Kuipers, O.P.; Saucedo-Cárdenas, O.; Montes-de-Oca-Luna, R. Heterologous protein expression by Lactococcus lactis. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 824, 155–165. [Google Scholar]
  20. Budin-Verneuil, A.; Pichereau, V.; Auffray, Y.; Ehrlich, D.S.; Maguin, E. Proteomic characterization of the acid tolerance response in Lactococcus lactis MG1363. Proteomics 2005, 5, 4794–4807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Song, S.; Li, P.; Zhang, R.; Chen, J.; Lan, J.; Lin, S.; Guo, G.; Xie, Z.; Jiang, S. Oral vaccine of recombinant Lactococcus lactis expressing the VP1 protein of duck hepatitis A virus type 3 induces mucosal and systemic immune responses. Vaccine 2019, 37, 4364–4369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ng, D.T.; Sarkar, C.A. Engineering signal peptides for enhanced protein secretion from Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Van de Guchte, M.; Kodde, J.; Van der Vossen, J.M.; Kok, J.; Venema, G. Heterologous gene expression in Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis: Synthesis, secretion, and processing of the Bacillus subtilis neutral protease. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56, 2606–2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Avall-Jääskeläinen, S.; Palva, A. Secretion of biologically active porcine interleukin-2 by Lactococcus lactis. Vet. Microbiol. 2006, 115, 278–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Freitas, D.A.; Leclerc, S.; Miyoshi, A.; Oliveira, S.C.; Sommer, P.S.; Rodrigues, L.; Correa Junior, A.; Gautier, M.; Langella, P.; Azevedo, V.A.; et al. Secretion of streptomyces tendae antifungal protein 1 by Lactococcus lactis. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2005, 38, 1585–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Simonen, M.; Palva, I. Protein secretion in Bacillus species. Microbiol. Rev. 1993, 57, 109–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Olins, P.O.; Rangwala, S.H. A novel sequence element derived from bacteriophage T7 mRNA acts as an enhancer of translation of the lacZ gene in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 16973–16976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Olins, P.O.; Devine, C.S.; Rangwala, S.H.; Kavka, K.S. The T7 phage gene 10 leader RNA, a ribosome-binding site that dramatically enhances the expression of foreign genes in Escherichia coli. Gene 1988, 73, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chai, Y.B.; Liu, H.P.; Zhao, Z.L.; Chen, S.M.; Chen, N.C.; Gao, H.; Liu, X.P. Construction of the expression vector pSC34 containing the prokaryotic translation enhancer T7g10L and its preliminary application. Lett. Biotechnol. 1997, 8, 138–139. [Google Scholar]
  30. Maqsood, I.; Shi, W.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Han, B.; Zhao, H.; Nadeem, A.M.; Moshin, B.S.; Saima, K.; Jamal, S.S.; et al. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of orally administered recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum expressing VP2 protein against IBDV in chicken. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 125, 1670–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, C.; Zhang, C.W.; Du, J.; Lu, X.Y. Study on the genetic stability of expression plasmid vector pMG36e in host bacteria. Health Res. 2005, 34, 214–216. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lei, H.; Xu, Y.; Chen, J.; Wei, X.; Lam, D.M. Immunoprotection against influenza H5N1 virus by oral administration of enteric-coated recombinant Lactococcus lactis mini-capsules. Virology 2010, 407, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Quigley, B.R.; Hatkoff, M.; Thanassi, D.G.; Ouattara, M.; Eichenbaum, Z.; Scott, J.R. A foreign protein incorporated on the tip of T3 pili in Lactococcus lactis elicits systemic and mucosal immunity. Infect. Immun. 2009, 78, 1294–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Underhill, D.M.; Ozinsky, A. Toll-like receptors: Key mediators of microbe detection. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2002, 14, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bahey-El-Din, M.; Casey, P.G.; Griffin, B.T.; Gahan, C.G. Expression of two Listeria monocytogenes antigens (P60 and LLO) in Lactococcus lactis and examination for use as live vaccine vectors. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010, 59, 904–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Moorthy, S.A.; Yasawardena, S.G.; Ramasamy, R. Age-dependent systemic antibody responses and immunisation-associated changes in mice orally and nasally immunised with Lactococcus lactis expressing a malaria parasite protein. Vaccine 2009, 27, 4947–4952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Parlane, N.A.; Grage, K.; Lee, J.W.; Buddle, B.M.; Denis, M.; Rehm, B.H. Production of a particulate hepatitis C vaccine candidate by an engineered Lactococcus lactis strain. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2011, 77, 8516–8522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Mosmann, T.R.; Cherwinski, H.; Bond, M.W.; Giedlin, M.A.; Coffman, R.L. Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins. J. Immunol. 1986, 136, 2348–2357. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Saraiva, M.; O’Garra, A. The regulation of IL-10 production by immune cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 10, 170–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Vaccines 09 01479 g001 550
Figure 1. Construction diagram of the recombinant plasmid. The fused T7g10L-Usp45-VP1-eGFP was finally inserted into the plasmid pMG36e after being digested by Xba I and Hind III.
Figure 1. Construction diagram of the recombinant plasmid. The fused T7g10L-Usp45-VP1-eGFP was finally inserted into the plasmid pMG36e after being digested by Xba I and Hind III.
Vaccines 09 01479 g001
Vaccines 09 01479 g002 550
Figure 2. Oral vaccination experiment in ducklings. A total of 125 one-day-old ducklings were randomly divided into four groups, named group I (MG1363-VP1, 33 ducklings), group II (MG1363-pMG36e, 33 ducklings), group III (blank control group, 41 ducklings), and group IV (egg-yolk antibody group, 33 ducklings).
Figure 2. Oral vaccination experiment in ducklings. A total of 125 one-day-old ducklings were randomly divided into four groups, named group I (MG1363-VP1, 33 ducklings), group II (MG1363-pMG36e, 33 ducklings), group III (blank control group, 41 ducklings), and group IV (egg-yolk antibody group, 33 ducklings).
Vaccines 09 01479 g002
Vaccines 09 01479 g003 550
Figure 3. The results of fluorescence microscopy: (a) bright field of MG1363-VP1; (b) fluorescent field of MG1363-VP1; (c) bright field of MG1363-pMG36e; (d) fluorescent field of MG1363-pMG36e. (Scale size: 20 μm).
Figure 3. The results of fluorescence microscopy: (a) bright field of MG1363-VP1; (b) fluorescent field of MG1363-VP1; (c) bright field of MG1363-pMG36e; (d) fluorescent field of MG1363-pMG36e. (Scale size: 20 μm).
Vaccines 09 01479 g003
Vaccines 09 01479 g004 550
Figure 4. The results of Western blotting: M: maker; (a1) supernatant protein of 10 h; (a2) supernatant protein of 12 h; (a3) supernatant protein of 14 h; (a4) supernatant protein of 16 h; (a5) negative control; (b1) intracellular soluble protein of 10 h; (b2) intracellular soluble protein of 12 h; (b3) intracellular soluble protein of 14 h; (b4) intracellular soluble protein of 16 h; (b5) negative control; (c1) inclusion protein of 10 h; (c2) inclusion protein of 12 h; (c3): inclusion protein of 14 h; (c4) inclusion protein of 16 h; (c5) negative control.
Figure 4. The results of Western blotting: M: maker; (a1) supernatant protein of 10 h; (a2) supernatant protein of 12 h; (a3) supernatant protein of 14 h; (a4) supernatant protein of 16 h; (a5) negative control; (b1) intracellular soluble protein of 10 h; (b2) intracellular soluble protein of 12 h; (b3) intracellular soluble protein of 14 h; (b4) intracellular soluble protein of 16 h; (b5) negative control; (c1) inclusion protein of 10 h; (c2) inclusion protein of 12 h; (c3): inclusion protein of 14 h; (c4) inclusion protein of 16 h; (c5) negative control.
Vaccines 09 01479 g004
Vaccines 09 01479 g005 550
Figure 5. Detection of immune responses in serum or intestine samples of ducklings. ★ p < 0.05; ★★ p < 0.01; ★★★ p < 0.001.
Figure 5. Detection of immune responses in serum or intestine samples of ducklings. ★ p < 0.05; ★★ p < 0.01; ★★★ p < 0.001.
Vaccines 09 01479 g005
Vaccines 09 01479 g006 550
Figure 6. Surviving numbers of the ducklings after natural DHAV-1 infection.
Figure 6. Surviving numbers of the ducklings after natural DHAV-1 infection.
Vaccines 09 01479 g006
Vaccines 09 01479 g007 550
Figure 7. Fluorescence microscopy of intestinal mucosal epithelial contents: (a) duodenum; (b) jejunum; (c) ileum; (d) cecum; (e) colon.
Figure 7. Fluorescence microscopy of intestinal mucosal epithelial contents: (a) duodenum; (b) jejunum; (c) ileum; (d) cecum; (e) colon.
Vaccines 09 01479 g007
Table
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
PrimersSequences (5′ to 3′)
Usp45-VP1-F1cagtgatactttctgctgcagccccgttgtcaggtgtttacgctGGTGATTCTAACCAGT
Usp45-VP1-F2atgaaaaaaaagattatctcagctattttaatgtctacagtgatactttctg
VP1-RaacagctcctcgcccttgctcaCTTCAATTTCCAAATTGAGTTC
T7g10L-FTCTAGAaataattttgtttaactttaagATGAAAAAAAAGATTATCTCA
eGFP-FAATTTGGAAATTGAAgtgagcaagggcgaggagctgttcac
eGFP-RAAGCTTtcagttatctagatccggtggatcccgggcccgcg
F’ctcgcccggggatcgatccTCTAGAaataattttgtttaactttaag
R’accttcgttttcagactttgcAAGCTTtcagttatctagatccggtggatc
MG1363-FGATGATACATAGCCGACCTGA
MG1363-RTTAGCCGTCCCTTTCTGG
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Zhang, R.; Wang, J.; Sui, N.; Xu, G.; Yan, H.; Zhu, Y.; Xie, Z.; Jiang, S. Construction of Recombinant Lactococcus lactis Strain Expressing VP1 Fusion Protein of Duck Hepatitis A Virus Type 1 and Evaluation of Its Immune Effect. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9121479

AMA Style

Zhang X, Zhang R, Wang J, Sui N, Xu G, Yan H, Zhu Y, Xie Z, Jiang S. Construction of Recombinant Lactococcus lactis Strain Expressing VP1 Fusion Protein of Duck Hepatitis A Virus Type 1 and Evaluation of Its Immune Effect. Vaccines. 2021; 9(12):1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9121479

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xiaoting, Ruihua Zhang, Jingyu Wang, Nana Sui, Guige Xu, Hui Yan, Yanli Zhu, Zhijing Xie, and Shijin Jiang. 2021. "Construction of Recombinant Lactococcus lactis Strain Expressing VP1 Fusion Protein of Duck Hepatitis A Virus Type 1 and Evaluation of Its Immune Effect" Vaccines 9, no. 12: 1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9121479

APA Style

Zhang, X., Zhang, R., Wang, J., Sui, N., Xu, G., Yan, H., Zhu, Y., Xie, Z., & Jiang, S. (2021). Construction of Recombinant Lactococcus lactis Strain Expressing VP1 Fusion Protein of Duck Hepatitis A Virus Type 1 and Evaluation of Its Immune Effect. Vaccines, 9(12), 1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9121479

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop