Next Article in Journal
DNA Fragmentation in Human Spermatozoa and Pregnancy Rates after Intrauterine Insemination. Should the DFI Threshold Be Lowered?
Previous Article in Journal
Application of a Genus-Specific LAMP Assay for Schistosome Species to Detect Schistosoma haematobium x Schistosoma bovis Hybrids
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/jcm10061309
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Macrolide-Resistant and Macrolide-Sensitive Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia in Children Treated Using Early Corticosteroids

by
Hye Young Han
1,2,
Ki Cheol Park
3,
Eun-Ae Yang
1,2,* and
Kyung-Yil Lee
1,4
1
Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea
2
Department of Pediatrics, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 64 Daeheung-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon 34943, Korea
3
Clinical Research Institute, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon 34943, Korea
4
Junglock Biomedical Institute, 127, Yuchun-ro, Jung-gu, Deajeon 34886, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(6), 1309; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061309
Submission received: 10 February 2021 / Revised: 17 March 2021 / Accepted: 18 March 2021 / Published: 22 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Pulmonology)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We have found that early corticosteroid therapy was effective for reducing morbidity during five Korea-wide epidemics. We evaluated the clinical and laboratory parameters of 56 children who received early corticosteroid treatment for pneumonia that was caused by macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae (M. pneumoniae) or macrolide-sensitive M. pneumoniae between July 2019 and February 2020. All subjects had dual positive results from a PCR assay and serological test, and received corticosteroids within 24–36 h after admission. Point mutation of residues 2063, 2064, and 2067 was identified in domain V of 23S rRNA. The mean age was 6.8 years and the male:female ratio was 1.2:1 (31:25 patients). Most of the subjects had macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae (73%), and all mutated strains had the A2063G transition. No significant differences in clinical and laboratory parameters were observed between macrolide-resistant and macrolide-sensitive M. pneumoniae groups that were treated with early dose-adjusted corticosteroids. Higher-dose steroid treatment may be needed for patients who have fever that persists for >48 h or increased biomarkers such as lactate dehydrogenase concentration at follow-up despite a usual dose of steroid therapy.

1. Introduction

Mycoplasma pneumoniae (M. pneumoniae) is a common cause of community-acquired pneumonia in children and young adults [1]. Epidemics of M. pneumoniae pneumonia have occurred in 3–4-year cycles in South Korea, with the most recent epidemic occurring in 2019 [2,3]. Although most patients with M. pneumoniae pneumonia have mild symptoms and a self-limited clinical course, some patients experience severe or refractory pneumonia and/or extrapulmonary complications, such as encephalopathy, Stevens-Jonson syndrome, small-vessel cutaneous vasculitis, myositis, and acute kidney injury, as well as other organ involvement [4,5,6].
Because M. pneumoniae does not have a cell wall, it is resistant to beta-lactams, fosfomycin, and glycopeptide antibiotics. However, M. pneumoniae is very sensitive to some antibiotics in vitro, such as macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and tetracyclines, which are used to treat M. pneumoniae infection. Macrolides are used as first-line antibiotics for children because they have a lower adverse drug reaction, although macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae strains have recently become prevalent in East Asian countries, including Japan, China, and South Korea [7,8,9]. In Korea, the majority of M. pneumoniae infections showed macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae strains with residue 2063 mutation in domain V of 23S rRNA, and macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae infection may also be increasingly common in other countries [9,10]. Thus, new treatment strategies have emerged for patients with macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae strains in Korea and other countries [11].
Some groups have reported that patients with macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae pneumonia have more severe clinical manifestations, such as longer fever duration and hospitalization, relative to patients with macrolide-sensitive M. pneumoniae pneumonia [7,10,12]. However, other groups have reported that macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae pneumonia might respond to macrolide treatment and that some clinical indices did not differ between macrolide-resistant and macrolide-sensitive M. pneumoniae pneumonia [13,14]. These findings suggest that other treatment modalities may be needed for antibiotic-unresponsive or severe M. pneumoniae pneumonia. Although the effects of antibiotic treatment on M. pneumoniae infection in children remain controversial, pediatricians have used alternative antibiotics and/or additional immune modulators, such as corticosteroids, for antibiotic-nonresponsive or refractory macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae pneumonia. We have also used corticosteroids for treating patients with severe M. pneumoniae pneumonia since the 2003 epidemic in Korea and have reported that early corticosteroid treatment was effective for reducing morbidity through five recent nationwide epidemics [15,16,17]. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical and laboratory parameters of children who received early corticosteroid treatment for pneumonia caused by macrolide-resistant or macrolide-sensitive M. pneumoniae.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Considerations

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the Daejeon St Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea (DC20SASI0075).

2.2. Subjects

This study evaluated previously healthy children who were diagnosed with M. pneumoniae pneumonia and admitted to The Catholic University of Korea Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital between July 2019 and February 2020. All eligible patients had positive M. pneumoniae results from a PCR assay and serological test. The exclusion criteria were patients with a negative M. pneumoniae result from the PCR assay and patients with a positive PCR result but a negative serological result.
The serological test was performed using a commercial ELISA kit (Diesse Diagnostica, Senese, Italy), and the IgM results were categorized according to the manufacturer’s instructions as positive (>1.1), negative (<0.9), or equivocal (0.9–1.1). A case of M. pneumoniae pneumonia was identified based on a positive IgM result or seroconversion (negative or equivocal to positive) in a child with pneumonia through 2 times serologic tests during hospitalization. Nasopharyngeal aspirate samples from 56 patients had been subjected to a multiplex bacterial PCR assay, which included M. pneumoniae, using the CFX96 Touch TM Real-Time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The remaining PCR materials were also stored for genetic analysis.
All patients had been treated using corticosteroids within 24–36 h after admission. The initial treatment in cases with milder pneumonia lesions involved oral prednisolone (1 mg/kg/day) or intravenous methylprednisolone (1–2 mg/kg/day), although a higher dose (5–10 mg/kg/day) was used for patients with more severe segmental/lobar lesions or respiratory distress (e.g., wheezing or tachypnea at presentation). If a patient exhibited persistent fever and disease progression at 48–72 h after the initial steroid therapy, an additional high-dose steroid was used (10–30 mg/kg/day) based on laboratory values and clinical severity. Pulmonary infiltration was evaluated by two authors (E.-A.Y. and H.Y.H.) based on the chest radiograph findings, which were classified as bronchopneumonia or segmental/lobar pneumonia. Medical records were reviewed to collect data regarding clinic-demographic characteristics, chest radiograph findings, and laboratory findings.

2.3. Nucleic Acid Extraction and PCR Analysis

All specimens containing M. pneumoniae DNA had been stored at −70 °C before testing. Nucleic acid extraction was performed using the Ribospin TM vRD plus kit (GeneAll Biotechnology, Seoul, Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was subjected to PCR using the Pfu Plus 5× Master mix (Elpis Biotech, Daejeon, Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primers targeted residues 1998–2018 (forward) and 2673–2692 (reverse) in domain V of 23S rRNA (Myco23S-F: 5-TCTCGGCTATAGACTCGGTGA-3 and Myco23S-R: 5-TAAGAGGTGTCCTCGCTTCG-3).
The PCR products were subjected to 1% agar gel electrophoresis using a submarine-type electrophoresis device (Mupid-exU; Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan). The approximately 700-bp band was identified under ultraviolet light, photographed using an imaging system (Geldoc XR image system; BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA), and then excised. The gel extraction procedure was performed using a commercial gel extraction SV kit (MGmed, Seoul, Korea), and the product was analyzed using the BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing and an ABI PRISM 3730XL Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Foster City, CA, USA). The DNA sequences were evaluated for point mutations at residues 2063, 2064, and 2067 in domain V of 23S rRNA using a sequence that is registered in the GenBank database (GenBank number: X68422).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 14.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous data were reported as median (interquartile range (IQR)), while categorical data were reported as number (percentage). Inter-group comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney test for continuous variables and the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Correlations between two continuous variables were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. All p-values were two-tailed, and differences were considered statistically significant at p-values of <0.05.

3. Results

The study included 56 patients with positive results from the PCR assay and serological test. The mean age was 6.8 years (min-max: 1–15 years), and the male: female ratio was 1.2:1 (31:25). Most patients (41/56 patients, 73.2%) had M. pneumoniae with the A2063G mutation (the macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae group), although 15 patients (the macrolide-sensitive M. pneumoniae group) had M. pneumoniae with no mutations at residues 2063, 2064, or 2067. There were no significant differences between the macrolide-resistant or macrolide-sensitive M. pneumoniae groups in terms of age, sex, fever duration before and after admission, total fever duration, admission duration, and chest radiograph findings (Table 1). The serological test results revealed IgM positivity at admission for 36 patients and IgM negativity at admission for 20 patients, although those patients had experienced seroconversion by the second examination. There were no significant inter-group differences in the serological test results (Table 1).
All patients initially received corticosteroid treatment within 24–36 h after admission. Most patients (46/56 patients, 82%) received low-dose corticosteroids (oral prednisolone at 1 mg/kg/day or intravenous methylprednisolone at 1–2 mg/kg/day), although 10 patients with more severe symptoms received high-dose steroid (5–10 mg/kg/day). After the treatment, 42 patients (75%) experienced defervescence within 24 h, 53 patients (94.6%) experienced defervescence within 48 h, and 54 patients (96.4%) experienced defervescence within 72 h. There was no significant difference in defervescence between the two groups. However, 2 patients who were infected with macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae received additional antibiotics (levofloxacin) and corticosteroids (20 and 30 mg/kg/day, respectively) due to persistent fever and rapid disease progression, based on deterioration of the chest radiographic findings and progressive pleural effusion at 48 h after starting initial therapy. Both completely improved without long-term complications. None of the patients received alternative antibiotics during their clinical course except for these two patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the corticosteroid treatments (Table 1).
Laboratory tests were performed for all patients at admission. No significant differences were observed between the macrolide-resistant and macrolide-sensitive M. pneumoniae groups in any of the laboratory markers. Of these, 33 were followed up on the 3rd or 4th day of hospitalization. At initial and follow up tests, laboratory markers including white blood cell count (WBC) and differential, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) showed statistically significant differences (Table 2).

4. Discussion

The present study revealed that 73% of the subjects had the A2063G mutation in domain V of 23S rRNA during the 2019 M. pneumoniae epidemic in Korea. One of macrolides, erythromycin, has a 14-membered structure that inhibits protein synthesis by interacting with the peptidyl transferase loop of the 23S rRNA. Mutations at residues 2063, 2064, 2067, and 2617 are associated with macrolide resistance [18], although the A2063G transition in the central loop is reportedly the major source of macrolide resistance in M. pneumoniae, as mutations at residues 2067 and 2617 are rare [19]. In Korea, approximately 60–87% of children have the A2063G mutant [10,13,20]. The prevalence of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae was reportedly 87% in Japan during 2011 [21], although other Japanese groups had reported that the prevalence of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae has decreased recently in Japan [22]. In contrast, Korea and China have reported high proportions of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae infections until recently [12,23]. A lower prevalence has been reported in the US (mean: 7.5%, range: 1.9–21.7%) [14], and an even lower prevalence has been observed in some European countries [24,25]. Thus, the proportion of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae likely varies according to region as well as to time period and the inherent epidemiological situation.
Previous studies have demonstrated that macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae can prolong the durations of fever and hospital stay and is associated with a higher frequency of alternative antibiotic treatment after macrolide treatment, relative to macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae [7,8,12,19,26]. Meanwhile, some studies have failed to detect significant differences in clinical presentation, radiographic findings, complications, or admission duration [13,14,20]. The present study also failed to detect significant differences between the macrolide-resistant or macrolide-sensitive M. pneumoniae groups in terms of clinical and laboratory parameters at presentation, including IgM positivity and corticosteroid responsiveness. These results may be influenced by early corticosteroid use, as most patients in both groups experienced defervescence within 3 days.
The pathogenesis of lung injury during M. pneumoniae infection and other infectious diseases such as COVID-19 remains unclear. The host’s hyperactive immune response against the infection’s insults may be related to host cell injury [1,27]. The host immune system may respond to substances produced by these pathogens (e.g., toxins and pathogen-associated molecular patterns), as well as to substances produced by infected host cells, such as pathogenic proteins, peptides, and damage-associated molecular patterns. In cases of pneumonia, substances produced by injured lung cells can induce even greater inflammation if they are released into the systemic circulation or local environment. Therefore, it is crucial to control the initial hyperactive immune response in order to reduce morbidity and prevent pneumonia progression. Given the dose-dependent effects of corticosteroids, higher doses may be needed for patients with severe pneumonia to help control the effects of pathogenic substances and the corresponding immune responses during the acute phase [28,29]. We have also previously reported that antibiotics may only have a limited effect on M. pneumoniae infection [17]. For these reasons and our experiences, we use steroids to treat M. pneumoniae pneumonia, but there has been an ongoing debate about the initiation time and dose of steroid therapy for M. pneumoniae infection [16,17,19].
There is no clear definition for severe antibiotic non-responsive or refractory M. pneumoniae pneumonia, although some studies have defined these cases as having a prolonged fever and lung lesion progression, despite 7 days of appropriate antibiotic treatment. We have encountered a few patients who did not respond to initial corticosteroid treatment and required additional corticosteroids during the 2015–2016 epidemic and in the present study [11,17]. Several studies have attempted to identify biomarkers that can predict refractory pneumonia. For example, potentially useful biomarkers for severe or refractory pneumonia include AST, ALT, LDH, CRP, ferritin, and various cytokines (IL-18, IL-6, or TNF-α) [4,30,31,32]. Furthermore, the initial immunological insults can induce further inflammation and possibly secondary bacterial invasion, which suggests that elevated values for LDH, CRP, and some biomarkers may reflect the degree of lung tissue injury and an increased risk of other organ involvement. Therefore, follow-up evaluation of these markers may be useful for monitoring disease progression. In our study, two patients who received additional high-dose steroids had the highest initial LDH concentrations, which increased after 3 days of the initial steroid treatment. Thus, we decided to use additional higher dose corticosteroid (20 and 30 mg/kg/day). In contrast, most patients had lower LDH concentrations at the follow-up examination, relative to their initial value. Because early control of ongoing inflammation is important and some biomarkers reflect inflammation severity, more aggressive treatments (e.g., high-dose pulse steroid treatment) based on the follow-up laboratory values and clinical severity, such as the patient’s persisting fever >48 h after starting the low-dose steroid treatment, may be needed.
The present study has several limitations. First, the sample size was small and selection bias is possible. However, we attempted to ensure that all patients had M. pneumoniae pneumonia by only including patients with dual positive results from the PCR assay and serological test. Second, relative to previous studies that were conducted at tertiary hospitals, there was a larger number of patients with mild pneumonia and early presentation. Third, this study was not a comparative study for corticosteroid effect because there was no control group with this respect.

5. Conclusions

The present study revealed macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae in 73% of the subjects during the 2019 epidemic in Korea, and all mutated strains had the A2063G mutation in domain V of 23S rRNA. There were no differences in clinical and laboratory parameters in either the macrolide-resistant or the macrolide-sensitive M. pneumoniae groups that were treated with early, dose-adjusted, corticosteroid therapy. In the era of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae strains, proper treatment modalities may be needed for severe antibiotic-unresponsive pneumonia patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.-A.Y., K.-Y.L.; methodology, E.-A.Y., K.C.P.; formal analysis, H.Y.H., K.C.P.; investigation, H.Y.H., K.C.P., E.-A.Y.; data curation, E.-A.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, H.Y.H., E.-A.Y.; writing—review and editing, K.-Y.L., E.-A.Y.; visualization, H.Y.H.; supervision, E.-A.Y.; project administration, E.-A.Y.; funding acquisition, E.-A.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Clinical Research Institute, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea in 2019.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Catholic University of Korea Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital (IRB No. DC20SASI0075).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was waived because the clinical samples that the M. pneumoniae bacteria were isolated from were taken for diagnostic purposes. The remaining samples were used for this study. The genetic sequencing of the M. pneumoniae 23S rRNA did not require written informed consent.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to restrictions of privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, K.Y. Pediatric respiratory infections by Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2008, 6, 509–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA). Infectious Disease Portal. Available online: http://www.kdca.go.kr/npt/biz/npp/iss/ariStatisticsMain.do (accessed on 28 November 2020).
  3. Kim, E.K.; Youn, Y.S.; Rhim, J.W.; Shin, M.S.; Kang, J.H.; Lee, K.Y. Epidemiological comparison of three Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia epidemics in a single hospital over 10 years. Korean J. Pediatr. 2015, 58, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Li, S.; Yang, D.; Wu, X.; Chen, Z. The clinical characteristics and predictors of refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Betti, C.; Camozzi, P.; Gennaro, V.; Bianchetti, M.G.; Scoglio, M.; Simonetti, G.D.; Milani, G.P.; Lava, S.A.; Ferrarini, A. Atypical Bacterial Pathogens and Small-Vessel Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis of the Skin in Children: Systematic Literature Review. Pathogens 2021, 10, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Simoni, C.; Camozzi, P.; Faré, P.B.; Bianchetti, M.G.; Kottanattu, L.; Lava, S.A.; Milani, G.P. Myositis and acute kidney injury in bacterial atypical pneumonia: Systematic literature review. J. Infect. Public Health 2020, 13, 2020–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Morozumi, M.; Takahashi, T.; Ubukata, K. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae: Characteristics of isolates and clinical aspects of community-acquired pneumonia. J. Infect. Chemother. 2010, 16, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cao, B.; Zhao, C.J.; Yin, Y.D.; Zhao, F.; Song, S.F.; Bai, L.; Zhang, J.Z.; Liu, Y.M.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Wang, H.; et al. High prevalence of macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae isolates from adult and adolescent patients with respiratory tract infection in China. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 51, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Hong, K.B.; Choi, E.H.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, S.Y.; Cho, E.Y.; Choi, J.H.; Kang, H.M.; Lee, J.; Ahn, Y.M.; Kang, Y.-H.; et al. Macrolide resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, South Korea, 2000–2011. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 1281–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lee, E.; Cho, H.J.; Hong, S.J.; Lee, J.; Sung, H.; Yu, J.H. Prevalence and clinical manifestations of macrolide resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in Korean children. Korean J. Pediatr. 2017, 60, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Yang, E.A.; Lee, K.Y. Additional corticosteroids or alternative antibiotics for the treatment of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Korean J. Pediatr. 2017, 60, 245–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Lee, H.; Choi, Y.Y.; Sohn, Y.J.; Kim, Y.K.; Han, M.S.; Yun, K.W.; Kim, K.; Park, J.Y.; Choi, J.H.; Cho, E.Y. Clinical Efficacy of Doxycycline for Treatment of Macrolide-Resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia in Children. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lee, H.; Yun, K.W.; Lee, H.J.; Choi, E.H. Antimicrobial therapy of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2018, 16, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Waites, K.; Ratliff, A.; Crabb, D.; Xiao, L.; Qin, X.; Selvarangan, R.; Tang, Y.W.; Zheng, X.; Bard, J.D.; Hong, T.; et al. Macrolide resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the United States as determined from a national surveillance program. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 57, e00968-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Lee, K.Y.; Lee, H.S.; Hong, J.H.; Lee, M.H.; Lee, J.S.; Burgner, D.; Lee, B.C. Role of prednisolone treatment in severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2006, 41, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Youn, Y.S.; Lee, S.C.; Rhim, J.W.; Shin, M.S.; Kang, J.H.; Lee, K.Y. Early additional immune-modulators for Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children: An observation study. Infect. Chemother. 2014, 46, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Yang, E.A.; Kang, H.M.; Rhim, J.W.; Kang, J.H.; Lee, K.Y. Early corticosteroid therapy for Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia irrespective of used antibiotics in children. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bébéar, C.; Pereyre, S.; Peuchant, O. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: Susceptibility and resistance to antibiotics. Future Microbiol. 2011, 6, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, Y.C.; Hsu, W.Y.; Chang, T.H. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in pediatric community-acquired pneumonia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 1382–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yoon, I.A.; Hong, K.B.; Lee, H.J.; Yun, K.W.; Park, J.Y.; Choi, Y.H.; Kim, W.S.; Lee, H.; Eun, B.W.; Ahn, Y.; et al. Radiologic findings as a determinant and no effect of macrolide resistance on clinical course of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Okada, T.; Morozumi, M.; Tajima, T.; Hasegawa, M.; Sakata, H.; Ohnari, S.; Chiba, N.; Iwata, S.; Ubukata, K. Rapid effectiveness of minocycline or doxycycline against macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in a 2011 outbreak among Japanese children. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 55, 1642–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Nakamura, Y.; Oishi, T.; Kaneko, K.; Kenri, T.; Tanaka, T.; Wakabayashi, S.; Kono, M.; Ono, S.; Kato, A.; Kondo, E. Recent acute reduction in macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections among Japanese children. J. Infect. Chemother. 2021, 27, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhao, F.; Li, J.; Liu, J.; Guan, X.; Gong, J.; Liu, L.; He, L.; Meng, F.; Zhang, J. Antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular characteristics of Mycoplasma pneumoniae isolates across different regions of China. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2019, 8, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Dumke, R.; Ziegler, T. Long-term low rate of macrolide resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae strains in Germany. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e00455-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Gullsby, K.; Olsen, B.; Bondeson, K.J. Molecular typing of Mycoplasma pneumoniae strains in Sweden from 1996 to 2017 and the emergence of a new P1 cytadhesin gene, variant 2e. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 57, e00049-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Suzuki, S.; Yamazaki, T.; Narita, M.; Okazaki, N.; Suzuki, I.; Andoh, T.; Matsuoka, M.; Kenri, T.; Arakawa, Y.; Sasaki, T. Clinical Evaluation of Macrolide-Resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 709–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Youn, Y.S.; Lee, K.Y. Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. Korean J. Pediatr. 2012, 55, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lee, K.Y. Pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and early immune-modulator therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Lee, K.Y.; Rhim, J.W.; Kang, J.H. Immunopathogenesis of COVID-19 and early immunomodulators. Clin. Exp. Pediatr. 2020, 63, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Oishi, T.; Uchiyama, M.; Matsui, K.; Shirai, T.; Matsuo, M.; Negishi, J.; Kaneko, T.; Tsukano, S.; Taguchi, T.; Narita, M. Clinical implications of interleukin-18 levels in pediatric patients with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. J. Infect. Chemother. 2011, 17, 803–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Miyashita, N.; Kawai, Y.; Inamura, N.; Tanaka, T.; Akaike, H.; Teranishi, H.; Wakabayashi, T.; Nakano, T.; Ouchi, K.; Okimoto, N. Setting a standard for the initiation of steroid therapy in refractory or severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in adolescents and adults. J. Infect. Chemother. 2015, 21, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lu, A.; Wang, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Qian, L. Lactate dehydrogenase as a biomarker for prediction of refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. Respir. Care 2015, 60, 1469–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Comparing the clinical characteristics of the macrolide-resistant or macrolide-sensitive M. pneumoniae groups.
Table 1. Comparing the clinical characteristics of the macrolide-resistant or macrolide-sensitive M. pneumoniae groups.
CharacteristicAll PatientsMRMPMSMPp-Value
n = 56(n = 41)(n = 15)
Age (years)6.8 (5.0–9.1)6.3(4.7–8.8)7.0 (5.8–10.3)0.264
Male:female ratio31:2525:166:90.162
Hospitalization (days)5 (4–6)5 (4–6)5 (5–6)0.774
Duration of fever (days)
Before admission5.0 (3.3–7.0)5.0 (3.5–7.0)5.0 (2–7.0)0.519
Total duration5.0 (3.3–7.0)6.0 (3.5–7.5)5.0 (3.0–7.0)0.864
Pulmonary infiltration, n (%)
Bronchopneumonia16 (28.6)12 (29.3)4 (26.7)0.849
Segmental/lobar pneumonia40 (71.4)29 (70.7)11 (73.3)
Serological test, n (%)
Initial ELISA IgM positive36 (64)27 (66)9 (60)0.686
IgM seroconversion20 (36)14 (34)6 (40)
Antibiotics, n (%)
Macrolide, n (%)51(91)38 (93)13 (87)0.484
Levofloxacin, n (%)2 (4)2 (5)0
Corticosteroids, n (%)
Low-dose (1–2 mg/kg)46 (82)34 (83)12 (80)1.000
High-dose (5–10 mg/kg)10 (18)7 (17)3 (20)
Additional high-dose (10–30 mg/kg)220
MRMP: macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae; MSMP: macrolide-sensitive Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Continuous variables are expressed as median (interquartile range (IQR)), and categorical variables are expressed as case’s absolute number (percentage).
Table
Table 2. Comparison of laboratory findings during admission.
Table 2. Comparison of laboratory findings during admission.
At Presentationp *All Patientsp†
MRMP (n = 41)MSMP (n = 15)Initial (n = 56)Follow-Up (n = 33)
Hb12.3 (11.5–12.9)12.4 (11.8–13.3)0.77412.4 (11.7–13.0)12.5 (12.0–13.2)0.068
WBC7.3 (5.7–8.8)7.6 (6.1–8.7)0.767.5 (5.7–8.7)9.8 (7.9–14.1)<0.001
N (%)65.9 (53.4–70.3)62.0 (48.0–67.8)0.37964.8 (52.6–70.2)74.6 (58.5–79.3)0.026
L (%)24.0 (19.1–37.0)25.2 (20.5–38.3)0.49424.8 (20.0–37.3)18.2 (11.3–30.3)0.033
M (%)8.1 (6.4–9.1)8.4 (6.9–9.2)0.4658.1 (6.8–9.1)7.7 (5.0–10.9)0.823
AST27 (23–33)26 (21–30)0.26227 (23–32)24 (20–29)<0.001
ALT12 (10–16)12 (8–14)0.54612 (10–15)19 (13–26)<0.001
ALP169 (153–207)167 (141–180)0.259168 (150–202)163 (126–186)0.022
LDH271 (247–330)250 (220–273)0.085269 (243–317)270 (231–308)0.007
ESR14 (8–24)17 (9–29)0.69114 (9–24)11 (4–17)0.004
CRP1.7 (1.0–2.6)2.2 (0.8–3.8)0.5051.8 (0.9–2.8)0.4 (0.1–0.9)<0.001
Values are presented as median (IQR). Hb: hemoglobin (g/dL), WBC: white blood cell count (×103/mm3), N: neutrophil, L: lymphocyte, M: monocyte, AST: aspartate aminotransferase (U/L), ALT: alanine aminotransferase (U/L), ALP: alkaline phosphatase (U/L), LDH: lactate dehydrogenase (U/L), ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h), CRP: C-reactive protein (mg/dL), MRMP: macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae, MSMP: macrolide-sensitive Mycoplasma pneumoniae, p: p-value. * Statistical analysis was performed between MRMP and MSMP groups. p-values were obtained using nonparametric t-test (Mann–Whitney test) for continuous variables. † Laboratory findings at admission and before discharge were compared. p-values were obtained using nonparametric paired t-test (Wilcoxon) for continuous variables.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, H.Y.; Park, K.C.; Yang, E.-A.; Lee, K.-Y. Macrolide-Resistant and Macrolide-Sensitive Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia in Children Treated Using Early Corticosteroids. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061309

AMA Style

Han HY, Park KC, Yang E-A, Lee K-Y. Macrolide-Resistant and Macrolide-Sensitive Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia in Children Treated Using Early Corticosteroids. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(6):1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Hye Young, Ki Cheol Park, Eun-Ae Yang, and Kyung-Yil Lee. 2021. "Macrolide-Resistant and Macrolide-Sensitive Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia in Children Treated Using Early Corticosteroids" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 6: 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061309

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop