Next Article in Journal
Detection and Prediction of Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Still’s Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Bone Mineral Density Compared to Trabecular Bone Score in Primary Hyperparathyroidism
Previous Article in Journal
Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve Using Dobutamine Test for Noninvasive Functional Assessment of Myocardial Bridging
Previous Article in Special Issue
Femoral µCT Analysis, Mechanical Testing and Immunolocalization of Bone Proteins in β-Hydroxy β-Methylbutyrate (HMB) Supplemented Spiny Mouse in a Model of Pregnancy and Lactation-Associated Osteoporosis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Structural Changes in Trabecular Bone, Cortical Bone and Hyaline Cartilage as Well as Disturbances in Bone Metabolism and Mineralization in an Animal Model of Secondary Osteoporosis in Clostridium perfringens Infection

J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(1), 205; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010205
by Agnieszka Tomczyk-Warunek 1, Tomasz Blicharski 1,*, Siemowit Muszyński 2, Ewa Tomaszewska 3, Piotr Dobrowolski 4, Rudolf Blicharski 1, Jaromir Jarecki 1, Anna Arczewska-Włosek 5, Sylwester Świątkiewicz 5 and Damian Józefiak 6
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(1), 205; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010205
Submission received: 15 November 2021 / Revised: 15 December 2021 / Accepted: 27 December 2021 / Published: 30 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Secondary Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see my additional comments in Red. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The study under review describes the effects of Clostridium perfringens infections on trabecular bone, cortical bone and hyaline cartilage of the growing chick. A large number of histomorphometric and serological parameters were measured to describe the influence of this intestinal infection on bone metabolism and mineralization.

The study is well planned and constructed and presents an exhaustive array of related results. The animal model chosen is suited for the clarification of the problem under study. Material and methods are sufficiently and reproducibly described. The manuscript is well structured well.

The study subject is of relevance to the clinician as well as to those interested in basic research.

The weakest point of the manuscript is the somewhat inexpert use of the English language. Some editing by a native English speaker seams highly recommendable.

For instance:

  • The calcification zone of the growth plate is called calcium zone
  • Line 381 “shows” instead of “shown”
  • Line 385 “study groups” instead of “studies groups”
  • Line 428 “factors” instead of “factor”
  • Line 442 “show” instead of “shows”
  • Line 448 “bacteria”? instead of “batteries”
  • And many more

Some sentences are incomplete and their meaning is hard to discern. For instance, Lines 336-342.

As an option the manuscript might win if the results are compared to diseases like rickets which shows similarities in some parameters like enlarged calcification zone of the growth plate and thicker trabeculae because of a higher amount of osteoid with delayed mineralization.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop