Does Application of Lymphatic Drainage with Kinesiology Taping Have Any Effect on the Extent of Edema and Range of Motion in Early Postoperative Recovery following Primary Endoprosthetics of the Knee Joint?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Methods
2.1.1. Clinical Assessment of Disease Activity in Osteoarthritis
2.1.2. Assessment of Postoperative Edema
2.1.3. Application of Dynamic Kinesio Tape
2.1.4. ROM Assessment in a Knee Joint
2.1.5. Postoperational Rehabilitation Programme
2.2. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Comparison of Differences in Linear Measurement in Ultrasound Scan between ‘KT’ Group and ‘Non-KT’ Group
3.2. Comparison of Differences in Knee Flexion Angle in the Third and the Eighth 24 Hours in ‘KT’ Group and ‘Non-KT’ Group
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sen, R.; Hurley, J.A. Osteoarthritis. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, D.; Shen, J.; Zhao, W.; Wang, T.; Han, L.; Hamilton, J.L.; Im, H.-J. Osteoarthritis: Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of Pathological Mechanism. Bone Res. 2017, 5, 16044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Castorina, S.; Guglielmino, C.; Castrogiovanni, P.; Szychlinska, M.A.; Ioppolo, F.; Massimino, P.; Leonardi, P.; Maci, C.; Iannuzzi, M.; Di Giunta, A.; et al. Clinical Evidence of Traditional vs Fast Track Recovery Methodologies after Total Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritic Knee Treatment. A Retrospective Observational Study. Muscle Ligaments Tendons J. 2019, 7, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Felson, D.T. An Update on the Pathogenesis and Epidemiology of Osteoarthritis. Radiol. Clin. N. Am. 2004, 42, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altman, R.; Asch, E.; Bloch, D.; Bole, G.; Borenstein, D.; Brandt, K.; Christy, W.; Cooke, T.D.; Greenwald, R.; Hochberg, M.; et al. Development of Criteria for the Classification and Reporting of Osteoarthritis: Classification of Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Arthritis Rheum. 1986, 29, 1039–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Page, C.J.; Hinman, R.S.; Bennell, K.L. Physiotherapy Management of Knee Osteoarthritis. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2011, 14, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carr, A.J.; Robertsson, O.; Graves, S.; Price, A.J.; Arden, N.K.; Judge, A.; Beard, D.J. Knee Replacement. Lancet 2012, 379, 1331–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Felson, D.T.; Lawrence, R.C.; Dieppe, P.A.; Hirsch, R.; Helmick, C.G.; Jordan, J.M.; Kington, R.S.; Lane, N.E.; Nevitt, M.C.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Osteoarthritis: New Insights. Part 1: The Disease and Its Risk Factors. Ann. Intern. Med. 2000, 133, 635–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jordan, K.M.; Arden, N.K.; Doherty, M.; Bannwarth, B.; Bijlsma, J.W.J.; Dieppe, P.; Gunther, K.; Hauselmann, H.; Herrero-Beaumont, G.; Kaklamanis, P.; et al. EULAR Recommendations 2003: An Evidence Based Approach to the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2003, 62, 1145–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, W.B.; Al-Dadah, O. Conservative Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Review of the Literature. World J. Orthop. 2022, 13, 212–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunter, D.J.; Lo, G.H. The Management of Osteoarthritis: An Overview and Call to Appropriate Conservative Treatment. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2008, 34, 689–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Picard, F.; Deakin, A.; Balasubramanian, N.; Gregori, A. Minimally Invasive Total Knee Replacement: Techniques and Results. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. Orthop. Traumatol. 2018, 28, 781–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Williamson, L.; Wyatt, M.R.; Yein, K.; Melton, J.T.K. Severe Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Acupuncture, Physiotherapy (Supervised Exercise) and Standard Management for Patients Awaiting Knee Replacement. Rheumatol. Oxf. Engl. 2007, 46, 1445–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Russell, T.G.; Buttrum, P.; Wootton, R.; Jull, G.A. Internet-Based Outpatient Telerehabilitation for Patients Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2011, 93, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kase, K.; Wallis, J.; Tsuyoshi, K. Clinical Therapeutic Applications of the Kinesio Taping Method, 3rd ed.; Kinesio: Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Kase, K.; Hashimoto, T.; Tomoki, O. Development of Kinesio Tape. In Kinesio Taping Perfect Manual; Kinesio Taping Association: Albuquerque, NM, USA, 1996; pp. 117–118. [Google Scholar]
- Castrogiovanni, P.; Di Giunta, A.; Guglielmino, C.; Roggio, F.; Romeo, D.; Fidone, F.; Imbesi, R.; Loreto, C.; Castorina, S.; Musumeci, G. The Effects of Exercise and Kinesio Tape on Physical Limitations in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2016, 1, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Krajczy, M.; Luniewski, J.; Bogacz, K.; Dybek, T.; Kiczyński, P.; Krajczy, E.; Szczegielniak, A.; Szczegielniak, J. Impact of Elastic Therapeutic Tape on Final Effects of Physiotherapy in Patients with Colles’ Fracture. Fizjoterapia Pol. 2014, 14, 42–49. [Google Scholar]
- Mostafavifar, M.; Wertz, J.; Borchers, J. A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping for Musculoskeletal Injury. Phys. Sportsmed. 2012, 40, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Jarecki, J.; Sobiech, M.; Turżańska, K.; Tomczyk-Warunek, A.; Jabłoński, M. A Kinesio Taping Method Applied in the Treatment of Postsurgical Knee Swelling after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hörmann, J.; Vach, W.; Jakob, M.; Seghers, S.; Saxer, F. Kinesiotaping for Postoperative Oedema—What Is the Evidence? A Systematic Review. BMC Sports Sci. Med. Rehabil. 2020, 12, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kohn, M.D.; Sassoon, A.A.; Fernando, N.D. Classifications in Brief: Kellgren-Lawrence Classification of Osteoarthritis. Clin. Orthop. 2016, 474, 1886–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schiphof, D.; de Klerk, B.M.; Kerkhof, H.J.M.; Hofman, A.; Koes, B.W.; Boers, M.; Bierma-Zeinstra, S.M.A. Impact of Different Descriptions of the Kellgren and Lawrence Classification Criteria on the Diagnosis of Knee Osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2011, 70, 1422–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiffert, M. Kinesiology Taping-Teoria, Metodyka, Przykładowe Aplikacje w Konkretnych Dysfunkcjach. Prakt. Fizjoterapia Rehabil. 2010, 2, 48–53. [Google Scholar]
- Hałas, I. Kinesiology Taping Metoda Wspomagająca Teratpię Tkanek Miękkich. Praktyczna Fizjoterapia i Rehabilitacja 2010, 9/10, 22–26. [Google Scholar]
- Boone, D.C.; Azen, S.P.; Lin, C.M.; Spence, C.; Baron, C.; Lee, L. Reliability of Goniometric Measurements. Phys. Ther. 1978, 58, 1355–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Artz, N.; Elvers, K.T.; Lowe, C.M.; Sackley, C.; Jepson, P.; Beswick, A.D. Effectiveness of Physiotherapy Exercise Following Total Knee Replacement: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2015, 16, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Denis, M.; Moffet, H.; Caron, F.; Ouellet, D.; Paquet, J.; Nolet, L. Effectiveness of Continuous Passive Motion and Conventional Physical Therapy after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Phys. Ther. 2006, 86, 174–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Herbold, J.A.; Bonistall, K.; Blackburn, M.; Agolli, J.; Gaston, S.; Gross, C.; Kuta, A.; Babyar, S. Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of Continuous Passive Motion after Total Knee Replacement. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2014, 95, 1240–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minns Lowe, C.; Barker, K.; Dewey, M.; Sackley, C. Effectiveness of Physiotherapy Exercise after Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. BMJ 2007, 335, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chughtai, M.; Sodhi, N.; Jawad, M.; Newman, J.M.; Khlopas, A.; Bhave, A.; Mont, M.A. Cryotherapy Treatment After Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review. J. Arthroplast. 2017, 32, 3822–3832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dębska, M. Kinesiology Taping Jako Metoda Terapeutyczna I Kosmetyczna W Stłuczeniu Mięśnia—Opis Przypadku. Polski Przegląd Nauk o Zdrowiu 2015, 1, 42. [Google Scholar]
- Osorio, J.A.; Vairo, G.L.; Rozea, G.D.; Bosha, P.J.; Millard, R.L.; Aukerman, D.F.; Sebastianelli, W.J. The Effects of Two Therapeutic Patellofemoral Taping Techniques on Strength, Endurance, and Pain Responses. Phys. Ther. Sport Off. J. Assoc. Chart. Physiother. Sports Med. 2013, 14, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murray, H.M. Effects of Kinesio Taping® on Muscle Strength after ACL-Repair. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2000, 30, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Kahanov, L. Kinesio Taping®, Part 1: An Overview of Its Use in Athletes. Athl. Ther. Today 2007, 12, 17–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tantawy, S.A.; Abdelbasset, W.K.; Nambi, G.; Kamel, D.M. Comparative Study between the Effects of Kinesio Taping and Pressure Garment on Secondary Upper Extremity Lymphedema and Quality of Life Following Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2019, 18, 1534735419847276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bosman, J.; Piller, N. Lymph Taping and Seroma Formation Post Breast Cancer. J. Lymphoedema 2010, 5, 12–21. [Google Scholar]
- Tsai, H.-J.; Hung, H.-C.; Yang, J.-L.; Huang, C.-S.; Tsauo, J.-Y. Could Kinesio Tape Replace the Bandage in Decongestive Lymphatic Therapy for Breast-Cancer-Related Lymphedema? A Pilot Study. Support. Care Cancer 2009, 17, 1353–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lietz-Kijak, D.; Kijak, E.; Krajczy, M.; Bogacz, K.; Łuniewski, J.; Szczegielniak, J. The Impact of the Use of Kinesio Taping Method on the Reduction of Swelling in Patients After Orthognathic Surgery: A Pilot Study. Med. Sci. Monit. 2018, 24, 3736–3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ristow, O.; Pautke, C.; Kehl, V.; Koerdt, S.; Schwärzler, K.; Hahnefeld, L.; Hohlweg-Majert, B. Influence of Kinesiologic Tape on Postoperative Swelling, Pain and Trismus after Zygomatico-Orbital Fractures. J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg. 2014, 42, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ristow, O.; Hohlweg-Majert, B.; Kehl, V.; Koerdt, S.; Hahnefeld, L.; Pautke, C. Does Elastic Therapeutic Tape Reduce Postoperative Swelling, Pain, and Trismus after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Fractures? J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2013, 71, 1387–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Białoszewski, D.; Woźniak, W.; Zarek, S. Clinical Efficacy of Kinesiology Taping in Reducing Edema of the Lower Limbs in Patients Treated with the Ilizarov Method—Preliminary Report. Ortop. Traumatol. Rehabil. 2009, 11, 46–54. [Google Scholar]
- Donec, V.; Kriščiūnas, A. The Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping® after Total Knee Replacement in Early Postoperative Rehabilitation Period. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2014, 50, 363–371. [Google Scholar]
- Hassan, S. Overview of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound for the Clinical Rheumatologist. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2018, 36 (Suppl. 114), 3–9. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
KT | Without KT | Test | p | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | 42 | 40 | - | - | - |
Age (years) | 66.69 ± 6.78 | 67.78 ± 7.56 | T | −0.68 | 0.51 |
Sex | M = 33 K = 9 | M = 32 F = 8 | Z | 0.11 | 0.92 |
Weight (kg) | 81.62 ± 13.57 | 80.05 ± 15.15 | T | 0.49 | 0.62 |
Height (m) | 164.93 ± 6.87 | 163.20 ± 8.76 | Z | 1.21 | 0.23 |
BMI | 30.03 ± 4.85 | 30.10 ± 5.59 | T | −0.06 | 0.95 |
Group | n | x | Me | Min | Max | IQR | SD | Student’s t-Test | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T | p | |||||||||
Differences in mm | KT | 42 | −1.12 | −1.10 | −4.50 | 1.70 | 1.90 | 1.32 | −3.01 | <0.01 * |
Differences in mm | Without KT | 40 | −0.18 | 0.00 | −3.40 | 2.70 | 1.70 | 1.51 |
Group | n | x | Me | Min | Max | IQR | SD | Student’s t-Test | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T | p | |||||||||
Difference in mm | KT | 42 | −0.90 | −0.75 | −3.90 | 2.90 | 1.40 | 1.43 | −2.60 | <0.05 * |
Difference in mm | Without KT | 40 | 0.02 | −0.05 | −4.20 | 4.40 | 1.85 | 1.76 |
Group | n | x | Me | Min | Max | IQR | SD | Mann–Whitney Test | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Z | p | |||||||||
Difference in mm | KT | 42 | −0.82 | −0.80 | −3.60 | 3.20 | 1.40 | 1.34 | −2.64 | <0.01 * |
Difference in mm | Without KT | 40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −5.20 | 3.40 | 2.00 | 1.79 |
Group | n | x | Me | Min | Max | IQR | SD | Wilcoxon Test | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Z | p | |||||||||
3rd 24 h without KT; flexion angle | With KT before | 42 | 44.48 | 40.00 | 20.00 | 80.00 | 12.00 | 13.40 | 5.51 | <0.001 * |
8th 24 h after KT; flexion angle | With KT after | 42 | 68.64 | 70.00 | 40.00 | 110.00 | 20.00 | 15.52 | ||
3rd 24 h without KT; flexion angle | Without KT before | 40 | 41.63 | 40.00 | 20.00 | 75.00 | 13.50 | 12.01 | 5.37 | <0.001 * |
8th 24 h after KT; flexion angle | Without KT after | 40 | 61.73 | 60.00 | 30.00 | 95.00 | 20.00 | 15.97 |
Group | n | x | Me | Min | Max | IQR | SD | Student’s t-Test | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T | p | |||||||||
Difference flexion angle | KT | 42 | 24.17 | 20.00 | 0.00 | 60.00 | 15.00 | 13.02 | 1.55 | >0.05 |
Variable | Group | n | R | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Difference in mm | KT | 42 | 0.02 | >0.05 |
without KT | 40 | 0.01 | >0.05 | |
Difference in mm | KT | 42 | 0.05 | >0.05 |
Without KT | 40 | 0.01 | >0.05 | |
Difference in mm | KT | 42 | −0.18 | >0.05 |
Without KT | 40 | 0.03 | >0.05 | |
Circuit difference at the height of the fibula head (cm) | KT | 42 | −0.22 | >0.05 |
Without KT | 40 | −0.11 | >0.05 | |
Circuit difference 2.5 cm above fibula neck (cm) | KT | 42 | −0.08 | >0.05 |
Without KT | 40 | −0.06 | >0.05 | |
Circuit difference 5 cm above fibula neck (cm) | KT | 42 | −0.17 | >0.05 |
Without KT | 40 | 0.09 | >0.05 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sobiech, M.; Czępińska, A.; Zieliński, G.; Zawadka, M.; Gawda, P. Does Application of Lymphatic Drainage with Kinesiology Taping Have Any Effect on the Extent of Edema and Range of Motion in Early Postoperative Recovery following Primary Endoprosthetics of the Knee Joint? J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3456. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123456
Sobiech M, Czępińska A, Zieliński G, Zawadka M, Gawda P. Does Application of Lymphatic Drainage with Kinesiology Taping Have Any Effect on the Extent of Edema and Range of Motion in Early Postoperative Recovery following Primary Endoprosthetics of the Knee Joint? Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(12):3456. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123456
Chicago/Turabian StyleSobiech, Magdalena, Agata Czępińska, Grzegorz Zieliński, Magdalena Zawadka, and Piotr Gawda. 2022. "Does Application of Lymphatic Drainage with Kinesiology Taping Have Any Effect on the Extent of Edema and Range of Motion in Early Postoperative Recovery following Primary Endoprosthetics of the Knee Joint?" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 12: 3456. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123456
APA StyleSobiech, M., Czępińska, A., Zieliński, G., Zawadka, M., & Gawda, P. (2022). Does Application of Lymphatic Drainage with Kinesiology Taping Have Any Effect on the Extent of Edema and Range of Motion in Early Postoperative Recovery following Primary Endoprosthetics of the Knee Joint? Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(12), 3456. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123456