Results of the National Contraception Survey Conducted by Sociedad Española de Contracepción (2020)
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
2.2. Measures
2.3. Data Collection
2.4. Sample Size
2.5. Data Analysis
2.6. Ethical Aspects
3. Results
3.1. Sexual Habits
Sexual Relationships and Use of Contraceptive Methods
3.2. Use of Emergency Oral Contraception
3.3. Information and Counselling on Contraceptive Methods
Information and Counselling about Long-Acting Reversible Methods
3.4. Contraceptive Use Pattern
3.4.1. Drivers for the Use of Reversible Methods
3.4.2. Hormonal Methods
3.4.3. Discontinuation of Hormonal Contraception
3.4.4. Use of the Dual Method
4. Discussion
5. Strengths and Limitations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Young, H.; Burke, L.; Nic Gabhainn, S. Sexual intercourse, age of initiation and contraception among adolescents in Ireland: Findings from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) Ireland study. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Jost, S.; Le Tohic, A.; Chis, C.; This, P.; Grosdemouge, I.; Panel, P. Contraception des femmes françaises de 15 à 45ans: Enquête nationale sur un échantillon représentatif de 5963 femmes [Contraception’s choice: Women’s opinion, satisfaction and profile. Results of a French national survey of a representative sample of 5963 women]. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. 2014, 42, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- French, R.S.; Gibson, L.; Geary, R.; Glasier, A.; Wellings, K. Changes in the prevalence and profile of users of contraception in Britain 2000–2010: Evidence from two National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles. BMJ Sex. Reprod. Health 2020, 46, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lete, I.; Doval, J.L.; Pérez-Campos, E.; Alonso, M.J.; Sellers, G.; Sánchez-Borrego, R. Prevention of unintended pregnancies by using emergency contraception: The differences between levonorgestrel and ulipristal acetate. A theoretical model using data from a survey on the use of emergency contraception in Spain, 2017. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2019, 35, 582–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Parliamentary Forum on Population & Development (EPF). CONTRACEPTION ATLAS. 2020. Available online: https://www.epfweb.org/european-contraception-atlas (accessed on 14 April 2022).
- Bonnet, C.; Blondel, B.; Moreau, C. A rise in births following contraceptive failure in France between 2010 and 2016: Results from the French national perinatal surveys. BMC Womens Health 2021, 21, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopp Kallner, H.; Thunell, L.; Brynhildsen, J.; Lindeberg, M.; Gemzell Danielsson, K. Use of Contraception and Attitudes towards Contraceptive Use in Swedish Women—A Nationwide Survey. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Finer, L.B.; Zolna, M.R. Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001–2008. Am. J. Public Health 2014, 104 (Suppl. 1), S43–S48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreau, C.; Bohet, A.; Trussell, J.; Bajos, N. Estimates of unintended pregnancy rates over the last decade in France as a function of contraceptive behaviors. Contraception 2014, 89, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alkema, L.; Kantorova, V.; Menozzi, C.; Biddlecom, A. National, regional, and global rates and trends in contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning between 1990 and 2015: A systematic and comprehensive analysis. Lancet 2013, 381, 1642–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blumenberg, C.; Hellwig, F.; Ewerling, F.; Barros, A.J.D. Socio-demographic and economic inequalities in modern contraception in 11 low- and middle-income countries: An analysis of the PMA2020 surveys. Reprod. Health 2020, 17, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lete, I.; Dueñas-Díez, J.-L.; Martínez-Salmeán, J.; Parrilla, J.; Serrano, I.; Bermejo, R.; Coll, C.; Doval, J. Contraceptive practices and trends in Spain: 1997–2003. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2007, 135, 73–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Podolskyi, V.; Gemzell-Danielsson, K.; Marions, L. Contraceptive experience and perception, a survey among Ukrainian women. BMC Womens Health 2018, 18, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ihongbe, T.O.; Masho, S.W. Changes in the Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods Among U.S. Nulliparous Women: Results from the 2006–2010, 2011–2013, and 2013–2015 National Survey of Family Growth. J. Womens Health 2018, 27, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Davis, S.A.; Braykov, N.P.; Lathrop, E.; Haddad, L.B. Familiarity with Long-acting Reversible Contraceptives among Obstetrics and Gynecology, Family Medicine, and Pediatrics Residents: Results of a 2015 National Survey and Implications for Contraceptive Provision for Adolescents. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2018, 31, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.; Folz, R.; Farron, M. Expanding choice and access in contraception: An assessment of intrauterine contraception policies in low and middle-income countries. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beshar, I.; So, J.; Chelvakumar, M.; Cahill, E.P.; Shaw, K.A.; Shaw, J.G. Socioeconomic differences persist in use of permanent vs long-acting reversible contraception: An analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth, 2006 to 2010 vs 2015 to 2017. Contraception 2021, 103, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grady, C.D.; Dehlendorf, C.; Cohen, E.D.; Schwarz, E.B.; Borrero, S. Racial and ethnic differences in contraceptive use among women who desire no future children, 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth. Contraception 2015, 92, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Diez, E.; Lopez, M.J.; Perez, G.; Garcia-Subirats, I.; Nebot, L.; Carreras, R.; Villalbi, J.R. Impact of a community contraceptive counselling intervention on adolescent fertility rates: A quasi-experimental study. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liddon, N.; O’Malley Olsen, E.; Carter, M.; Hatfield-Timajchy, K. Withdrawal as pregnancy prevention and associated risk factors among US high school students: Findings from the 2011 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Contraception 2016, 93, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaramillo, N.; Buhi, E.R.; Elder, J.P.; Corliss, H.L. Associations Between Sex Education and Contraceptive Use Among Heterosexually Active, Adolescent Males in the United States. J. Adolesc. Health 2017, 60, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harper, C.C.; Stratton, L.; Raine, T.R.; Thompson, K.; Henderson, J.T.; Blum, M.; Postlethwaite, D.; Speidel, J.J. Counseling and provision of long-acting reversible contraception in the US: National survey of nurse practitioners. Prev. Med. 2013, 57, 883–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lee, J.; Berenson, A.B.; Patel, P.R. Characteristics of Females Who Use Contraception at Coitarche: An Analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth 2006–2010 Database. J. Womens Health 2015, 24, 972–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Daniels, K.; Abma, J.C. Current Contraceptive Status Among Women Aged 15–49: United States, 2017–2019. NCHS Data Brief 2020, 388, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Lete, I.; Hassan, F.; Chatzitheofilou, I.; Wood, E.; Mendivil, J.; Lambreeli, D.; Filonenko, A.; Lambrelli, D. Direct costs of unintended pregnancy in Spain. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2015, 20, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Parra Ribes, I.; Rascón Poza, J.J.; Pérez Campos, E.; Bugella Yudice, I.; Rodríguez Domingo, M.J. Economic Burden of Contraception Management in Spain. J. Health Econ. Outcomes Res. 2018, 6, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chuy, V.S.; Rajagopal, G.; Talluri, R.; Cheng, A.L.; Dall, L. Factors Influencing Contraceptive Use Among Sexually Active U.S. Middle and High School Students, 2015 to 2019. Cureus 2021, 13, e20803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, R.H.; Wellings, K.; Lindberg, L. Adolescent Sexual Activity, Contraceptive Use, and Pregnancy in Britain and the U.S.: A Multidecade Comparison. J. Adolesc. Health 2020, 66, 582–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Diez, E.; Lopez, M.J.; Marí-Dell’Olmo, M.; Nebot, L.; Pérez, G.; Villalbi, J.R.; Carreras, R. Effects of a counselling intervention to improve contraception in deprived neighbourhoods: A randomized controlled trial. Eur. J. Public Health 2018, 28, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín, T.C. Contraceptive use patterns among Spanish single youth. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2005, 10, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dueñas, J.L.; Lete, I.; Arbat, A.; Bermejo, R.; Coll, C.; Doval, J.L.; Martínez-Salmeán, J.; Pérez-Campos, E.; Serrano, I. Trends in contraception use in Spanish adolescents and young adults (15 to 24 years) between 2002 and 2008. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2013, 18, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, P.J.; Cheng, A.L.; Carlson, K.; Witt, J. Advanced Practice Registered Nurses and Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. J. Midwifery Womens Health 2017, 62, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stern, L.F.; Simons, H.R.; Kohn, J.E.; Debevec, E.J.; Morfesis, J.M.; Patel, A.A. Differences in contraceptive use between family planning providers and the U.S. population: Results of a nationwide survey. Contraception 2015, 91, 464–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Emtell Iwarsson, K.; Larsson, E.C.; Bizjak, I.; Envall, N.; Kopp Kallner, H.; Gemzell-Danielsson, K. Long-acting reversible contraception and satisfaction with structured contraceptive counselling among non-migrant, foreign-born migrant and second-generation migrant women: Evidence from a cluster randomised controlled trial (the LOWE trial) in Sweden. BMJ Sex. Reprod. Health 2022, 48, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bastianelli, C.; Rosato, E.; Farris, M.; Benagiano, G. Emergency contraception: A survey of 1773 women. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2016, 21, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bauzà, M.L.; Esteva, M.; Molina, J.; Pereiró, I.; Ingla, M.; March, S. Emergency contraception and risk habits in a university population. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2018, 23, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leon-Larios, F.; Ruiz-Ferron, C.; Jalon-Neira, R.M.; Praena-Fernández, J.M. Nursing Students’ Knowledge, Awareness, and Experiences of Emergency Contraception Pills’ Use. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haimovich, S. Profile of long-acting reversible contraception users in Europe. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2009, 14, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sherin, M.; Waters, J. Long-acting reversible contraceptives for adolescent females: A review of current best practices. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2019, 31, 675–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women, Contraceptive Equity Expert Work Group, and Committee on Ethics. Patient-Centered Contraceptive Counseling: ACOG Committee Statement Number 1. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 139, 350–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, R.; Huysman, B.C.; Maddipati, R.; Madden, T. Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 222, S884.e1–S884.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacCallum-Bridges, C.L.; Margerison, C.E. The Affordable Care Act contraception mandate & unintended pregnancy in women of reproductive age: An analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth, 2008–2010 vs. 2013–2015. Contraception 2020, 101, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Long, S.; Colson, L. Intrauterine Device Insertion and Removal. Prim. Care 2021, 48, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wigginton, B.; Harris, M.L.; Loxton, D.; Lucke, J.C. A qualitative analysis of women’s explanations for changing contraception: The importance of non-contraceptive effects. J. Fam. Plan. Reprod. Health Care 2016, 42, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Landersoe, S.K.; Petersen, K.B.; Vassard, D.; Larsen, E.C.; Nielsen, H.S.; Pinborg, A.; Nøhr, B.; Andersen, A.N.; Schmidt, L. Concerns on future fertility among users and past-users of combined oral contraceptives: A questionnaire survey. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2019, 24, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables | Total n (%) 1778 (100) |
---|---|
Age | |
15–19 years old | 170 (9.6) |
20–24 years old | 189 (10.6) |
25–29 years old | 211 (11.9) |
30–34 years old | 249 (14) |
35–39 years old | 308 (17.3) |
40–44 years old | 335 (18.8) |
45–49 years old | 316 (17.8) |
Relationship situation | |
Lives with her partner | 1011 (56.9) |
Steady partner, but not living together | 325 (18.3) |
No steady partner | 442 (24.9) |
Schooling level | |
Elementary School | 84 (4.7) |
High School | 917 (51.9) |
University Studies | 767 (43.4) |
Nationality | |
Spanish | 1602 (90.2) |
Other | 174 (9.8) |
Income level | |
Low | 401 (25.8) |
Average-Low | 663 (42.6) |
Average | 300 (19.3) |
High | 191 (12.3) |
Work situation | 1748 (100) |
Working | 1036 (59.3) |
Not working | 711 (40.7) |
Religious beliefs | |
Practicing Catholic | 242 (13.6) |
Lapsed Catholic | 753 (42.4) |
Other religions | 111 (6.2) |
Agnostic/Atheist | 673 (37.8) |
Use of ECPs | Total | Relationship Situation | Contraceptive Methods Generally Used | Nationality | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lives with Her Partner | Steady Partner, Not Living Together | No Steady Partner | Condoms | Pills | IUD | Voluntary Sterilization | Other Methods | None | Spanish | Other | ||
Yes | 38.4% | 34.1% | 46.1% | 43.4% | 46.8% | 40.8% | 37.7% | 30.0% | 46.4% | 30.2% | 38.3% | 39.8% |
No | 61.5% | 65.9% | 5.9% | 56.3% | 53.2% | 59.2% | 62.3% | 70.0% | 53.6% | 69.8% | 61.7% | 60.2% |
DNK/DNA | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Counselling | Total | Nationality | Schooling Level | Income Level | Religious Beliefs | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spanish | Other | Elementary School | High School | University Studies | Low | Average-Low | Average | High | Practicing Catholic | Lapsed Catholic | Professes Other Religions | Agnostic/Atheist | ||
Yes | 64.3% | 65.5% | 54.6% | 57.7% | 64.2% | 65.8% | 63.3% | 66.7% | 71.4% | 62.7% | 62.6% | 65.7% | 59.3% | 64.3% |
No | 35.6% | 34.5% | 45.4% | 42.3% | 35.8% | 34.2% | 36.7% | 33.3% | 28.6% | 37.3% | 37.4% | 34.2% | 40.7% | 35.7% |
DNK/DNA | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Effective methods (98.5%) | Barrier | Condoms | 47.5% | |
Hormonal (36%) | Oral administration (29.1%) | Pills | 28.1% | |
Mini pills | 1.0% | |||
Intravaginal administration | Vaginal ring | 3.2% | ||
Patch | 1.0% | |||
Injectable (monthly-quarterly) | 0.5% | |||
Subcutaneous implant (1 or 2 bars) | 2.2% | |||
IUD (12.5%) | Copper | 6.5% | ||
Hormone release | 6.0% | |||
Voluntary sterilization (irreversible) 2.5% | Fallopian tube ligation/Essure procedure (tubal obstruction) | 1.6% | ||
Vasectomy | 0.9% | |||
Little effective methods (0.2%) | Natural or Periodic abstinence | Knauss–Ogino (standard day method), Billings’ method (cervical mucus), temperature method | 0.1% | |
Interruption | Coitus interruptus (withdrawal) | 0.1% | ||
Others | 0.7% |
Discontinuation | Total | Nationality | Schooling Level | Motherhood Situation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spanish | Other | Elementary School | High School | University Studies | Has Children and Wants More | Has Children and Does Not Want More | Does Not Have Children but Wants to | Does Not Have Children and Does Not Want to | ||
Yes | 28.0% | 28.7% | 15.7% | 19.2% | 29.5% | 26.5% | 31.8% | 31.5% | 26.6% | 26.2% |
No | 68.9% | 68.2% | 80.1% | 75.9% | 68.4% | 69.0% | 68.2% | 65.7% | 69.7% | 70.3% |
DNK/DNA | 3.2% | 3.1% | 4.2% | 4.9% | 2.2% | 4.5% | 0.0% | 2.8% | 3.7% | 3.5% |
Total | Nationality | Schooling Level | Relationship Situation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spanish | Other | Elementary School | High School | University Studies | Lives with Her Partner | Steady Partner, but Not Living together | No Steady Partner | ||
Yes (Always/Almost always) | 16.9% | 17.1% | 14.6% | 22.6% | 18.8% | 14.6% | 11.8% | 20.5% | 26.7% |
No (Never, Almost never or Sometimes) | 82.6% | 82.4% | 85.4% | 75.1% | 81.0% | 84.8% | 87.7% | 79.5% | 72.6% |
DNK/DNA | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 2.3% | 0.1% | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.7% |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Leon-Larios, F.; Gutiérrez Ales, J.; Puente Martínez, M.J.; Correa Rancel, M.; Lahoz Pascual, I.; Silva Reus, I.; Quílez Conde, J.C. Results of the National Contraception Survey Conducted by Sociedad Española de Contracepción (2020). J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3777. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133777
Leon-Larios F, Gutiérrez Ales J, Puente Martínez MJ, Correa Rancel M, Lahoz Pascual I, Silva Reus I, Quílez Conde JC. Results of the National Contraception Survey Conducted by Sociedad Española de Contracepción (2020). Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(13):3777. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133777
Chicago/Turabian StyleLeon-Larios, Fatima, José Gutiérrez Ales, María José Puente Martínez, Marta Correa Rancel, Isabel Lahoz Pascual, Isabel Silva Reus, and José Cruz Quílez Conde. 2022. "Results of the National Contraception Survey Conducted by Sociedad Española de Contracepción (2020)" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 13: 3777. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133777
APA StyleLeon-Larios, F., Gutiérrez Ales, J., Puente Martínez, M. J., Correa Rancel, M., Lahoz Pascual, I., Silva Reus, I., & Quílez Conde, J. C. (2022). Results of the National Contraception Survey Conducted by Sociedad Española de Contracepción (2020). Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(13), 3777. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133777