Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Mid-Term Outcomes after Revascularisation of Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: Results from a Prospective Cohort Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Multiparametric Dual-Time-Point [18F]FDG PET/MRI for Lymph Node Staging in Patients with Untreated FIGO I/II Cervical Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
Circulating Osteogenic Progenitor Cells Enhanced with Teriparatide or Denosumab Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of 18F-Fluoroestradiol PET in Metastatic Breast Cancer: The Second Youth of an Older Theranostic Concept
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Intracranial Solitary Fibrous Tumor: A “New” Challenge for PET Radiopharmaceuticals

J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(16), 4746; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164746
by Angela Sardaro 1, Paolo Mammucci 2, Antonio Rosario Pisani 2,*, Dino Rubini 2, Anna Giulia Nappi 2, Lilia Bardoscia 3 and Giuseppe Rubini 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(16), 4746; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164746
Submission received: 18 July 2022 / Revised: 11 August 2022 / Accepted: 12 August 2022 / Published: 14 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue PET/CT Imaging in Oncology: Clinical Updates and Perspectives)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

congratulations for this interesting and well written paper about a very uncommon disease charachterized by a challenging behaviour.

The role of methabolic imaging in this setting is well investigated and the review is substantially well conducted.

English language is linear and the bibliography is complete.

My only concern is about the conclusions. PRobably the authors, based also on their experience, should try to give a more robust suggestion on what would be the most used tracer in clinical practice.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Thank you very much.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This is the review of an Intracranial solitary fibrous tumor visualized by several PET tracers and the author aimed at indicating the best PET tracer for the diagnosis of SFT.   

The author should add the mechanism of accumulation for each PET tracer in more detail.

 

In table 1, the author showed the uptake level of PET tracers to SFT. Please define the level of uptake and it is good to add the reported SUV for each case in the sentence.

 Please refer to what will be the major differential diagnosis of SFT in each tracer.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Thank you very much.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop