Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Cardiology: A Scoping Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Sources and Searches
2.2. Article Selection
2.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
3. Results
3.1. AI and Heart Murmurs
3.2. Image Processing with AI
3.2.1. Chest X-ray
3.2.2. MRI
3.2.3. Echocardiography
3.2.4. ECG
3.3. Prognosis and Risk Stratification
3.4. Planning and Management of Cardiac Interventions
3.5. AI in Cardiac Surgeries
3.6. AI in other Pediatric Heart Diseases
3.7. AI Algorithms in Pediatric Cardiology
4. Discussion
- (1)
- AI prediction algorithms: AI prediction algorithms can help assess patients’ risk based on left ventricular ejection fraction and predict post-surgery mortality outcomes based on predefined criteria.
- (2)
- Wearables: Wearables and mobile monitoring devices can help with ambulatory monitoring and early diagnosis. They can also help in educating patients about lifestyle modifications and health promotion.
- (3)
- EMR: Real-time analysis and the clustering of patients through EMR can help formulate research questions and aid the applicability of precision medicine.
- (4)
- Electrocardiography: ECG processing and classification based on deep learning-based algorithms can aid diagnosis.
- (5)
- Echocardiography: Deep learning-based programs such as FINE can also help process echo images to enhance the precision of detection of abnormalities.
- (6)
- Auscultation: AI algorithms such as wavelet analysis and ANN with digital stethoscopes promise to improve the accuracy of detecting abnormal heart sounds (murmurs).
4.1. AI: An Efficient Physician Assistant
4.2. Challenges to AI in Pediatric Cardiology
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Noonan, J.A. A History of Pediatric Specialties: The Development of Pediatric Cardiology. Pediatr. Res. 2004, 56, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- van der Linde, D.; Konings, E.E.M.; Slager, M.A.; Witsenburg, M.; Helbing, W.A.; Takkenberg, J.J.M.; Roos-Hesselink, J.W. Birth Prevalence of Congenital Heart Disease Worldwide. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, 58, 2241–2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Roth, G.A.; Mensah, G.A.; Johnson, C.O.; Addolorato, G.; Ammirati, E.; Baddour, L.M.; Barengo, N.C.; Beaton, A.Z.; Benjamin, E.J.; Benziger, C.P.; et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990–2019. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 76, 2982–3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blue, G.M.; Kirk, E.P.; Sholler, G.F.; Harvey, R.P.; Winlaw, D.S. Congenital Heart Disease: Current Knowledge about Causes and Inheritance. Med. J. Aust. 2012, 197, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gilboa, S.M.; Devine, O.J.; Kucik, J.E.; Oster, M.E.; Riehle-Colarusso, T.; Nembhard, W.N.; Xu, P.; Correa, A.; Jenkins, K.; Marelli, A.J. Congenital Heart Defects in the United States. Circulation 2016, 134, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- van der Bom, T.; Zomer, A.C.; Zwinderman, A.H.; Meijboom, F.J.; Bouma, B.J.; Mulder, B.J.M. The Changing Epidemiology of Congenital Heart Disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2011, 8, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Chen, S.; Zühlke, L.; Black, G.C.; Choy, M.; Li, N.; Keavney, B.D. Global Birth Prevalence of Congenital Heart Defects 1970–2017: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 260 Studies. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2019, 48, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Higashi, H.; Barendregt, J.J.; Kassebaum, N.J.; Weiser, T.G.; Bickler, S.W.; Vos, T. The Burden of Selected Congenital Anomalies Amenable to Surgery in Low and Middle-Income Regions: Cleft Lip and Palate, Congenital Heart Anomalies and Neural Tube Defects. Arch. Dis. Child. 2015, 100, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lytzen, R.; Vejlstrup, N.; Bjerre, J.; Petersen, O.B.; Leenskjold, S.; Dodd, J.K.; Jørgensen, F.S.; Søndergaard, L. Live-Born Major Congenital Heart Disease in Denmark. JAMA Cardiol. 2018, 3, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mcleod, G.; Shum, K.; Gupta, T.; Chakravorty, S.; Kachur, S.; Bienvenu, L.; White, M.; Shah, S.B. Echocardiography in Congenital Heart Disease. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2018, 61, 468–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramos Nascimento, B.; Zawacki Beaton, A. Improved Standardisation of Training Needed to Achieve the Potential of Handheld Echocardiography. Heart 2021, 107, 1772–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van den Eynde, J.; Kutty, S.; Danford, D.A.; Manlhiot, C. Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Cardiology: Taking Baby Steps in the Big World of Data. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2022, 37, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Basu, K.; Sinha, R.; Ong, A.; Basu, T. Artificial Intelligence: How Is It Changing Medical Sciences and Its Future? Indian J. Dermatol. 2020, 65, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mathur, P.; Srivastava, S.; Xu, X.; Mehta, J.L. Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Cardiovascular Disease. Clin. Med. Insights Cardiol. 2020, 14, 117954682092740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaffar, S.; Gearhart, A.S.; Chang, A.C. The Next Frontier in Pediatric Cardiology. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 2020, 67, 995–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lemaire, J.B.; Schaefer, J.P.; Martin, L.A.; Faris, P.; Ainslie, M.D.; Hull, R.D. Effectiveness of the Quick Medical Reference as a Diagnostic Tool. CMAJ 1999, 161, 725–728. [Google Scholar]
- Begic, E.; Gurbeta Pokvic, L.; Begic, Z.; Begic, N.; Dedic, M.; Mrsic, D.; Jamakovic, M.; Vila, N.; Badnjevic, A. From Heart Murmur to Echocardiography—Congenital Heart Defects Diagnostics Using Machine-Learning Algorithms. Psychiatr. Danub. 2021, 33, 236–246. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Yang, Z.; Quan, J.; Liu, L.; Tian, J. Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Heart Sound Analysis in Children with Left-to-Right Shunt Congenital Heart Disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 2022, 348, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helman, S.M.; Herrup, E.A.; Christopher, A.B.; Al-Zaiti, S.S. The Role of Machine Learning Applications in Diagnosing and Assessing Critical and Non-Critical CHD: A Scoping Review. Cardiol. Young 2021, 31, 1770–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nurmaini, S.; Rachmatullah, M.N.; Sapitri, A.I.; Darmawahyuni, A.; Tutuko, B.; Firdaus, F.; Partan, R.U.; Bernolian, N. Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Fetal Echocardiography: Application to Heart Standard View Segmentation for Congenital Heart Defects Detection. Sensors 2021, 21, 8007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, J.; Dong, B.; Lei, H.; Shi, G.; Wang, H.; Zhu, F.; Wen, C.; Zhang, Q.; Fu, L.; Gu, X.; et al. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Auscultation in Detecting Congenital Heart Disease. Eur. Heart J. Digit. Health 2021, 2, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davies, R.; Babu-Narayan, S.V. Deep Learning in Congenital Heart Disease Imaging: Hope but Not Haste. Heart 2020, 106, 960–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yeo, L.; Romero, R. Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography (FINE): A Novel Method for Rapid, Simple, and Automatic Examination of the Fetal Heart. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 42, 268–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arnaout, R.; Curran, L.; Chinn, E.; Zhao, Y.; Moon-Grady, A. Deep-Learning Models Improve on Community-Level Diagnosis for Common Congenital Heart Disease Lesions. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1809.06993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertsimas, D.; Zhuo, D.; Dunn, J.; Levine, J.; Zuccarelli, E.; Smyrnakis, N.; Tobota, Z.; Maruszewski, B.; Fragata, J.; Sarris, G.E. Adverse Outcomes Prediction for Congenital Heart Surgery: A Machine Learning Approach. World J. Pediatr. Congenit. Heart Surg. 2021, 12, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morris, S.A.; Lopez, K.N. Deep Learning for Detecting Congenital Heart Disease in the Fetus. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 764–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dozen, A.; Komatsu, M.; Sakai, A.; Komatsu, R.; Shozu, K.; Machino, H.; Yasutomi, S.; Arakaki, T.; Asada, K.; Kaneko, S.; et al. Image Segmentation of the Ventricular Septum in Fetal Cardiac Ultrasound Videos Based on Deep Learning Using Time-Series Information. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nishimori, M.; Kiuchi, K.; Nishimura, K.; Kusano, K.; Yoshida, A.; Adachi, K.; Hirayama, Y.; Miyazaki, Y.; Fujiwara, R.; Sommer, P.; et al. Accessory Pathway Analysis Using a Multimodal Deep Learning Model. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 8045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Wang, J.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, Y. A Myocardial Segmentation Method Based on Adversarial Learning. Biomed. Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 6618918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, Y.; Gudapati, V.; Lin, R.; Fei, Y.; Packard, R.R.S.; Song, S.; Chang, C.-C.; Baek, K.I.; Wang, Z.; Roustaei, M.; et al. Saak Transform-Based Machine Learning for Light-Sheet Imaging of Cardiac Trabeculation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 68, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Decourt, C.; Duong, L. Semi-Supervised Generative Adversarial Networks for the Segmentation of the Left Ventricle in Pediatric MRI. Comput. Biol. Med. 2020, 123, 103884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aro, A.L.; Jaakkola, I. Artificial Intelligence in ECG Screening: Ready for Prime Time? Int. J. Cardiol. 2021, 344, 111–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson, W.R.; Reinisch, A.J.; Unterberger, M.J.; Schriefl, A.J. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Auscultation of Heart Murmurs: Validation by Virtual Clinical Trial. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2019, 40, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karimi-Bidhendi, S.; Arafati, A.; Cheng, A.L.; Wu, Y.; Kheradvar, A.; Jafarkhani, H. Fully-automated Deep-learning Segmentation of Pediatric Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance of Patients with Complex Congenital Heart Diseases. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2020, 22, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mori, H.; Inai, K.; Sugiyama, H.; Muragaki, Y. Diagnosing Atrial Septal Defect from Electrocardiogram with Deep Learning. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2021, 42, 1379–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benovoy, M.; Dionne, A.; McCrindle, B.W.; Manlhiot, C.; Ibrahim, R.; Dahdah, N. Deep Learning-Based Approach to Automatically Assess Coronary Distensibility Following Kawasaki Disease. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2022, 43, 807–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sweatt, A.J.; Hedlin, H.K.; Balasubramanian, V.; Hsi, A.; Blum, L.K.; Robinson, W.H.; Haddad, F.; Hickey, P.M.; Condliffe, R.; Lawrie, A.; et al. Discovery of Distinct Immune Phenotypes Using Machine Learning in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Circ. Res. 2019, 124, 904–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Diller, G.-P.; Babu-Narayan, S.; Li, W.; Radojevic, J.; Kempny, A.; Uebing, A.; Dimopoulos, K.; Baumgartner, H.; Gatzoulis, M.A.; Orwat, S. Utility of Machine Learning Algorithms in Assessing Patients with a Systemic Right Ventricle. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2019, 20, 925–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Luo, M.; Zheng, J.; Luo, J.; Zeng, R.; Feng, N.; Du, Q.; Fang, J. An Artificial Neural Network Prediction Model of Congenital Heart Disease Based on Risk Factors. Medicine 2017, 96, e6090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tandon, A.; Mohan, N.; Jensen, C.; Burkhardt, B.E.U.; Gooty, V.; Castellanos, D.A.; McKenzie, P.L.; Zahr, R.A.; Bhattaru, A.; Abdulkarim, M.; et al. Retraining Convolutional Neural Networks for Specialized Cardiovascular Imaging Tasks: Lessons from Tetralogy of Fallot. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2021, 42, 578–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samad, M.D.; Wehner, G.J.; Arbabshirani, M.R.; Jing, L.; Powell, A.J.; Geva, T.; Haggerty, C.M.; Fornwalt, B.K. Predicting Deterioration of Ventricular Function in Patients with Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot Using Machine Learning. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2018, 19, 730–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Diller, G.-P.; Lammers, A.E.; Babu-Narayan, S.; Li, W.; Radke, R.M.; Baumgartner, H.; Gatzoulis, M.A.; Orwat, S. Denoising and Artefact Removal for Transthoracic Echocardiographic Imaging in Congenital Heart Disease: Utility of Diagnosis Specific Deep Learning Algorithms. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2019, 35, 2189–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montalt-Tordera, J.; Quail, M.; Steeden, J.A.; Muthurangu, V. Reducing Contrast Agent Dose in Cardiovascular MR Angiography with Deep Learning. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2021, 54, 795–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, J.C.; Binuesa, F.; Caneo, L.F.; Turquetto, A.L.R.; Arita, E.C.T.C.; Barbosa, A.C.; Fernandes, A.M.D.S.; Trindade, E.M.; Jatene, F.B.; Dossou, P.-E.; et al. Improving Preoperative Risk-of-Death Prediction in Surgery Congenital Heart Defects Using Artificial Intelligence Model: A Pilot Study. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0238199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siontis, K.C.; Liu, K.; Bos, J.M.; Attia, Z.I.; Cohen-Shelly, M.; Arruda-Olson, A.M.; Zanjirani Farahani, N.; Friedman, P.A.; Noseworthy, P.A.; Ackerman, M.J. Detection of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy by an Artificial Intelligence Electrocardiogram in Children and Adolescents. Int. J. Cardiol. 2021, 340, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Z.; Wang, W.; Zong, R.; Pan, J.; Yang, H. Classification of Heart Sound Signals in Congenital Heart Disease Based on Convolutional Neural Network. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi 2019, 36, 728–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bozkurt, B.; Germanakis, I.; Stylianou, Y. A Study of Time-Frequency Features for CNN-Based Automatic Heart Sound Classification for Pathology Detection. Comput. Biol. Med. 2018, 100, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khurshid, S.; Friedman, S.; Pirruccello, J.P.; di Achille, P.; Diamant, N.; Anderson, C.D.; Ellinor, P.T.; Batra, P.; Ho, J.E.; Philippakis, A.A.; et al. Deep Learning to Predict Cardiac Magnetic Resonance–Derived Left Ventricular Mass and Hypertrophy from 12-Lead ECGs. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, 14, e012281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ernst, S.; Babu-Narayan, S.V.; Keegan, J.; Horduna, I.; Lyne, J.; Till, J.; Kilner, P.J.; Pennell, D.; Rigby, M.L.; Gatzoulis, M.A. Remote-Controlled Magnetic Navigation and Ablation with 3D Image Integration as an Alternative Approach in Patients with Intra-Atrial Baffle Anatomy. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2012, 5, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Papoutsidakis, N.; Heitner, S.B.; Mannello, M.C.; Rodonski, A.; Campbell, W.; McElheran, K.; Jacoby, D.L. Machine-Assisted Genotype Update System (MAGUS) for Inherited Cardiomyopathies. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2018, 11, e004835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, S.-H.; Tsai, H.-T.; Lin, W.-L.; Chen, Y.-C.; Chou, C.; Lin, H.-W. Predicting the Serum Digoxin Concentrations of Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit through an Artificial Neural Network. BMC Pediatr. 2019, 19, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, Z.; Zhu, J.; Gao, Y.; Yin, Q.; Hu, M.; Dai, L.; Deng, C.; Yi, L.; Deng, K.; Wang, Y.; et al. Maternal Exposure to Ambient PM10 during Pregnancy Increases the Risk of Congenital Heart Defects: Evidence from Machine Learning Models. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 630, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, H.; Yang, D.; Tang, K.; Hu, C.; Li, L.; Zhang, L.; Gong, T.; Cui, Y. Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting the Occurrence of Postoperative Malnutrition in Children with Congenital Heart Disease. Clin. Nutr. 2022, 41, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, L.; Li, J.; Huang, M.; Zhuang, J.; Yuan, H.; Jia, Q.; Zeng, D.; Que, L.; Xi, Y.; Lin, J.; et al. Prediction of Pulmonary Pressure after Glenn Shunts by Computed Tomography–Based Machine Learning Models. Eur. Radiol. 2020, 30, 1369–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauptmann, A.; Arridge, S.; Lucka, F.; Muthurangu, V.; Steeden, J.A. Real-time Cardiovascular MR with Spatio-temporal Artifact Suppression Using Deep Learning–Proof of Concept in Congenital Heart Disease. Magn. Reason. Med. 2019, 81, 1143–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Diller, G.-P.; Kempny, A.; Babu-Narayan, S.V.; Henrichs, M.; Brida, M.; Uebing, A.; Lammers, A.E.; Baumgartner, H.; Li, W.; Wort, S.J.; et al. Machine Learning Algorithms Estimating Prognosis and Guiding Therapy in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: Data from a Single Tertiary Centre Including 10,019 Patients. Eur. Heart J. 2019, 40, 1069–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, W.; Yu, K.; Ye, J.; Li, H.; Chen, J.; Yin, F.; Xu, J.; Zhu, J.; Li, D.; Shu, Q. Automatic Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease Classification Based on Heart Sound Signal. Artif. Intell. Med. 2022, 126, 102257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-Fernández, D.; Monsalve Torra, A.; Soriano-Payá, A.; Marín-Alonso, O.; Triana Palencia, E. Aid Decision Algorithms to Estimate the Risk in Congenital Heart Surgery. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2016, 126, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Narula, S.; Shameer, K.; Salem Omar, A.M.; Dudley, J.T.; Sengupta, P.P. Machine-Learning Algorithms to Automate Morphological and Functional Assessments in 2D Echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 68, 2287–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gandhi, S.; Mosleh, W.; Shen, J.; Chow, C.-M. Automation, Machine Learning, and Artificial Intelligence in Echocardiography: A Brave New World. Echocardiography 2018, 35, 1402–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, K.W.; Torres Soto, J.; Glicksberg, B.S.; Shameer, K.; Miotto, R.; Ali, M.; Ashley, E.; Dudley, J.T. Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 71, 2668–2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kokol, P.; Završnik, J.; Blažun Vošner, H. Artificial Intelligence and Pediatrics: A Synthetic Mini Review. Pediatr. Dimens. 2017, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Qin, C.; Qiu, H.; Tarroni, G.; Duan, J.; Bai, W.; Rueckert, D. Deep Learning for Cardiac Image Segmentation: A Review. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 7, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, A. Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery: Irrational Hype or Paradigm Shift? Ann. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2019, 12, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Diller, G.P.; Orwat, S.; Vahle, J.; Bauer, U.M.M.; Urban, A.; Sarikouch, S.; Berger, F.; Beerbaum, P.; Baumgartner, H. Prediction of Prognosis in Patients with Tetralogy of Fallot Based on Deep Learning Imaging Analysis. Heart 2020, 106, 1007–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, G.; Mao, Y.; Li, M.; Peng, L.; Ling, Y.; Zhou, X. The Optimal Tetralogy of Fallot Repair Using Generative Adversarial Networks. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 613330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Asmare, M.H.; Woldehanna, F.; Janssens, L.; Vanrumste, B. Rheumatic Heart Disease Detection Using Deep Learning from Spectro-Temporal Representation of Un-Segmented Heart Sounds. In Proceedings of the 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), Montreal, QC, Canada, 20–24 July 2020; pp. 168–171. [Google Scholar]
- Lakhe, A.; Sodhi, I.; Warrier, J.; Sinha, V. Development of Digital Stethoscope for Telemedicine. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 2016, 40, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arafati, A.; Hu, P.; Finn, J.P.; Rickers, C.; Cheng, A.L.; Jafarkhani, H.; Kheradvar, A. Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric and Adult Congenital Cardiac MRI: An Unmet Clinical Need. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 2019, 9, S310–S325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pyles, L.; Hemmati, P.; Pan, J.; Yu, X.; Liu, K.; Wang, J.; Tsakistos, A.; Zheleva, B.; Shao, W.; Ni, Q. Initial Field Test of a Cloud-Based Cardiac Auscultation System to Determine Murmur Etiology in Rural China. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2017, 38, 656–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Andrisevic, N.; Ejaz, K.; Rios-Gutierrez, F.; Alba-Flores, R.; Nordehn, G.; Burns, S. Detection of Heart Murmurs Using Wavelet Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks. J. Biomech. Eng. 2005, 127, 899–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Segaier, M.; Lilja, O.; Lukkarinen, S.; Sörnmo, L.; Sepponen, R.; Pesonen, E. Computer-Based Detection and Analysis of Heart Sound and Murmur. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 33, 937–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kang, S.; Doroshow, R.; McConnaughey, J.; Shekhar, R. Automated Identification of Innocent Still’s Murmur in Children. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2017, 64, 1326–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia-Canadilla, P.; Sanchez-Martinez, S.; Crispi, F.; Bijnens, B. Machine Learning in Fetal Cardiology: What to Expect. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2020, 47, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, S.; Zhou, Y.; Shang, J.; Xiao, C.; Sun, J. Opportunities and Challenges of Deep Learning Methods for Electrocardiogram Data: A Systematic Review. Comput. Biol. Med. 2020, 122, 103801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bodenhofer, U.; Haslinger-Eisterer, B.; Minichmayer, A.; Hermanutz, G.; Meier, J. Machine Learning-Based Risk Profile Classification of Patients Undergoing Elective Heart Valve Surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2021, 60, 1378–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gampala, S.; Vankeshwaram, V.; Gadula, S.S.P. Is Artificial Intelligence the New Friend for Radiologists? A Review Article. Cureus 2020, 12, e11137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van den Eynde, J.; Manlhiot, C.; van de Bruaene, A.; Diller, G.-P.; Frangi, A.F.; Budts, W.; Kutty, S. Medicine-Based Evidence in Congenital Heart Disease: How Artificial Intelligence Can Guide Treatment Decisions for Individual Patients. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, M.; Li, Y.; Chen, R.; Huang, C.; Mao, Y.; Zhao, B. Diagnostic Performance of Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography (FINE) in Fetuses with Double-Outlet Right Ventricle (DORV). Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 36, 2165–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zeng, X.; Hu, Y.; Shu, L.; Li, J.; Duan, H.; Shu, Q.; Li, H. Explainable Machine-Learning Predictions for Complications after Pediatric Congenital Heart Surgery. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 17244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- lo Muzio, F.P.; Rozzi, G.; Rossi, S.; Luciani, G.B.; Foresti, R.; Cabassi, A.; Fassina, L.; Miragoli, M. Artificial Intelligence Supports Decision Making during Open-Chest Surgery of Rare Congenital Heart Defects. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aufiero, S.; Bleijendaal, H.; Robyns, T.; Vandenberk, B.; Krijger, C.; Bezzina, C.; Zwinderman, A.H.; Wilde, A.A.M.; Pinto, Y.M. A Deep Learning Approach Identifies New ECG Features in Congenital Long QT Syndrome. BMC Med. 2022, 20, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dias, R.D.; Shah, J.A.; Zenati, M.A. Artificial Intelligence in Cardiothoracic Surgery. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2020, 68, 532–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, T.; Liu, G.; Lin, H. A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Intravenous Immunoglobulin Resistance in Kawasaki Disease Patients: A Study Based on a Southeast China Population. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0237321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martins, J.F.B.S.; Nascimento, E.R.; Nascimento, B.R.; Sable, C.A.; Beaton, A.Z.; Ribeiro, A.L.; Meira, W.; Pappa, G.L. Towards Automatic Diagnosis of Rheumatic Heart Disease on Echocardiographic Exams through Video-Based Deep Learning. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2021, 28, 1834–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, P.; Katkar, G.D.; Shimizu, C.; Kim, J.; Khandelwal, S.; Tremoulet, A.H.; Kanegaye, J.T.; Abe, N.; Austin-Page, L.; Bryl, A.; et al. An Artificial Intelligence-Guided Signature Reveals the Shared Host Immune Response in MIS-C and Kawasaki Disease. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arnaout, R.; Curran, L.; Zhao, Y.; Levine, J.C.; Chinn, E.; Moon-Grady, A.J. An Ensemble of Neural Networks Provides Expert-Level Prenatal Detection of Complex Congenital Heart Disease. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 882–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zuercher, M.; Ufkes, S.; Erdman, L.; Slorach, C.; Mertens, L.; Taylor, K. Retraining an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Calculate Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Pediatrics. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2022, 36, 3610–3616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sepehri, A.A.; Hancq, J.; Dutoit, T.; Gharehbaghi, A.; Kocharian, A.; Kiani, A. Computerized Screening of Children Congenital Heart Diseases. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2008, 92, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ko, W.-Y.; Siontis, K.C.; Attia, Z.I.; Carter, R.E.; Kapa, S.; Ommen, S.R.; Demuth, S.J.; Ackerman, M.J.; Gersh, B.J.; Arruda-Olson, A.M.; et al. Detection of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Using a Convolutional Neural Network-Enabled Electrocardiogram. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 75, 722–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeGroff, C.G.; Bhatikar, S.; Hertzberg, J.; Shandas, R.; Valdes-Cruz, L.; Mahajan, R.L. Artificial Neural Network–Based Method of Screening Heart Murmurs in Children. Circulation 2001, 103, 2711–2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Na, J.Y.; Kim, D.; Kwon, A.M.; Jeon, J.Y.; Kim, H.; Kim, C.-R.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, J.; Park, H.-K. Artificial Intelligence Model Comparison for Risk Factor Analysis of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Nationwide Very Low Birth Weight Infants Cohort. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sepehri, A.A.; Gharehbaghi, A.; Dutoit, T.; Kocharian, A.; Kiani, A. A Novel Method for Pediatric Heart Sound Segmentation without Using the ECG. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2010, 99, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chou, F.-S.; Ghimire, L.V. Identification of Prognostic Factors for Pediatric Myocarditis with a Random Forests Algorithm-Assisted Approach. Pediatr. Res. 2021, 90, 427–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ali, F.; Hasan, B.; Ahmad, H.; Hoodbhoy, Z.; Bhuriwala, Z.; Hanif, M.; Ansari, S.U.; Chowdhury, D. Detection of Subclinical Rheumatic Heart Disease in Children Using a Deep Learning Algorithm on Digital Stethoscope: A Study Protocol. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e044070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leng, S.; Tan, R.S.; Chai, K.T.C.; Wang, C.; Ghista, D.; Zhong, L. The Electronic Stethoscope. Biomed. Eng. Online 2015, 14, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ma, X.-J.; Huang, G.-Y. Current Status of Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Neonatal Congenital Heart Disease in China. World J. Pediatr. 2018, 14, 313–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ahmad, M.S.; Mir, J.; Ullah, M.O.; Shahid, M.L.U.R.; Syed, M.A. An Efficient Heart Murmur Recognition and Cardiovascular Disorders Classification System. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 2019, 42, 733–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferguson, E.C.; Krishnamurthy, R.; Oldham, S.A.A. Classic Imaging Signs of Congenital Cardiovascular Abnormalities. Radiographics 2007, 27, 1323–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sreedhar, C.; Ram, M.S.; Alam, A.; Indrajit, I. Cardiac MRI in Congenital Heart Disease—Our Experience. Med. J. Armed Forces India 2005, 61, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Garcia-Canadilla, P.; Isabel-Roquero, A.; Aurensanz-Clemente, E.; Valls-Esteve, A.; Miguel, F.A.; Ormazabal, D.; Llanos, F.; Sanchez-de-Toledo, J. Machine Learning-Based Systems for the Anticipation of Adverse Events after Pediatric Cardiac Surgery. Front. Pediatr. 2022, 10, 930913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilhelm, D.; Ostler, D.; Müller-Stich, B.; Lamadé, W.; Stier, A.; Feußner, H. Künstliche Intelligenz in Der Allgemein- Und Viszeralchirurgie. Der Chir. 2020, 91, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Qiu, H.; Jia, Q.; Dong, Y.; Yao, Z.; Xie, W.; Guo, H.; Yuan, H.; Zhuang, J.; Huang, M.; et al. AI-CHD. Commun. ACM 2021, 64, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahayni, A.A.; Attia, Z.I.; Medina-Inojosa, J.R.; Elsisy, M.F.A.; Noseworthy, P.A.; Lopez-Jimenez, F.; Kapa, S.; Asirvatham, S.J.; Friedman, P.A.; Crestenallo, J.A.; et al. Electrocardiography-Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Aids in Prediction of Long-Term Mortality after Cardiac Surgery. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2021, 96, 3062–3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Newburger, J.W.; Takahashi, M.; Burns, J.C. Kawasaki Disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 67, 1738–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bayers, S.; Shulman, S.T.; Paller, A.S. Kawasaki Disease. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2013, 69, 513.e1–513.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santosh, K.C. AI-Driven Tools for Coronavirus Outbreak: Need of Active Learning and Cross-Population Train/Test Models on Multitudinal/Multimodal Data. J. Med. Syst. 2020, 44, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Benke, K.; Benke, G. Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Public Health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mollura, D.J.; Culp, M.P.; Pollack, E.; Battino, G.; Scheel, J.R.; Mango, V.L.; Elahi, A.; Schweitzer, A.; Dako, F. Artificial Intelligence in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Innovating Global Health Radiology. Radiology 2020, 297, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCall, B. COVID-19 and Artificial Intelligence: Protecting Health-Care Workers and Curbing the Spread. Lancet Digit. Health 2020, 2, e166–e167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, P.; Pathania, M.; Rathaur, V.K. Overview of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2019, 8, 2328–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerke, S.; Minssen, T.; Cohen, G. Ethical and Legal Challenges of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Healthcare. In Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 295–336. [Google Scholar]
Serial No. | Authors | Study Design | References | Pediatric Heart Diseases Covered | Applications of AI | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AI in Diagnosis/Fetal Imaging | AI in Prognosis/Risk Stratification | AI in Cardiac Intervention | |||||
1 | Jef Van den Eynde et al. | Review | [12] | General description | Clinical examination and diagnosis; image processing | Cardiovascular intervention planning and management; prognosis and risk classification. | Omics and precision medicine; fetal cardiology |
2 | Jingjing Lv et al. | Observational study | [21] | CHD | AI–AA platform revealed similar results to the experts’ face-to-face auscultation and reported high auscultation accuracy in detecting aberrant heart sounds. | - | - |
3 | Rhodri Davies et al. | Editorial | [22] | General description | Minor discernible fluctuations when ejection fraction was evaluated by a cardiac MRI expert were 8.7%, owing primarily to poor repeatability. Deep learning enables more accurate and precise analysis with quantifiable levels of confidence in the outcomes. | - | - |
4 | Sharib Gaffar et al. | Review | [15] | General description | - | With the aid of precise predictive risk calculators, ongoing health monitoring from wearables, and precision medicine, AI can assist in providing the best possible patient care. | - |
5 | Yeo et al. | Observational study | [23] | General description | FINE is an intelligent navigation technique that automatically acquires several anatomical views of the fetal heart during echocardiography to identify anomalies therein. In four cases, the instrument was able to show fetal heart structural malformations. | - | - |
6 | Arnaout et al. | Observational study | [24] | General description | Using 685 echocardiograms of fetuses between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation, supervised fully convolutional DL was used to (1) identify the 5 most crucial views of the fetal heart; (2) segment and measure the cardiac structures; and (3) differentiate between normal hearts, tetralogy of Fallot, and hypoplastic left heart syndrome. | - | - |
7 | Dimitris Bertsimas et al. | Observational study | [25] | CHD | - | For patients who underwent congenital heart surgery, machine learning (ML) models can predict mortality, postoperative mechanical ventilatory support time (MVST), and hospital length of stay (congenital heart surgery). | - |
8 | Ulrich Bodenhofer et al. | Editorial | [25] | CHD | - | In comparison with existing risk scores based on logistic regression on pre-selected factors, advanced machine learning is more accurate at predicting the results of valve surgery treatments. This strategy enables training models for the cohorts of certain institutions and is generalizable to other elective high-risk procedures. | - |
9 | Shaine A. Morris et al. | Expert opinion | [26] | CHD | Congenital illness, the most prevalent and fatal birth defect, could be more accurately diagnosed during pregnancy thanks to recent developments in machine learning. | - | - |
10 | Siti Nurmaini et al. | Observational study | [20] | CHD | Studies based on 1149 fetal heart images to predict 24 objects, including 3 congenital heart defect instances, 17 heart-chamber objects in each view, and 4 conventional fetal heart view shapes showed that the suggested model worked satisfactorily for segmenting standard views, with an intersection over union of 79.97% and a Dice coefficient similarity of 89.70%. Automatic segmentation and detection methods could significantly increase the number of CHD diagnoses. | - | - |
11 | Ai Dozen et al. | Observational study | [27] | VSD | To calibrate the output of U-net, cropping-segmentation-calibration (CSC) uses the time-series information of videos and specific section information. The mean intersections over union (mIoU) of 0.0224, 0.1519, and 0.5543, respectively, were used to assess the segmentation outcomes of DeepLab v3+, U-net, and CSC. | - | - |
12 | Makoto Nishimori et al. | Scientific report | [28] | Accessory pathway and WPW syndrome | A multimodal deep learning model based on 1D-CNN using ECG waveforms supported with CXR showed great accuracy in identifying AP location. | - | - |
13 | Tao Wang et al. | Observational study | [29] | General description | The adversarial learning mechanism focusing on the overall spatial structure and context consistency of myocardium showed more accuracy than the conventional method. | - | - |
14 | Yichen Ding et al. | Observational study | [30] | General description | The complete 3-D imaging of cardiac architecture and mechanics is made possible using light-sheet fluorescence microscopy. This innovative approach offers a solid foundation for post-light-sheet image processing and supports data-driven machine learning for the automated measurement of cardiac ultra-structure. | - | - |
15 | C Decourt et al. | Observational study | [31] | General description | The identification of the left ventricle in pediatric MRI using a generative adversarial network (GAN) segmentation approach was useful for the automatic analysis of cardiac MRI and for carrying out large-scale investigations based on MRI reading with a limited amount of training data. | - | - |
16 | Aapo L. Aro et al. | Editorial | [32] | ECG | Based on a single 12-lead electrocardiogram, AI may identify structural heart problems (AI-ECG). | - | - |
17 | W. Reid Thompson et al. | Observational study | [33] | CHD | An objective evaluation of an AI-based murmur detection algorithm showed promising results with a Sensitivity of 93% (CI 90–95%), specificity of 81% (CI 75–85%), with accuracy 88% (CI 85–91%) for the detection of pathologic cases. They also suggested that it could be used to compare the efficacy of other algorithms on the same particular dataset. | - | - |
18 | Saeed Karimi-Bidhendi et al. | Observational study | [34] | CHD | A GAN was devised that could accurately to synthetically augment the training dataset via generating synthetic CMR images and their corresponding chamber segmentations successfully. | - | - |
19 | Hiroki Mori et al. | Observational study | [35] | Using a deep learning model comprising a CNN and LTSMs, the researchers identified that the AI algorithm could identify the disease accurately with more sensitivity and specificity than pediatric cardiologists using electrocardiograms. | - | - | |
20 | Benovoy M et al. | Observational study | [36] | Kawasaki disease | The degree of optical coherence tomography (OCT) observations of KD-related CA damage correlates with the degree of distensibility changes in the coronary artery (CA) of Kawasaki disease (KD) patients. When observed longitudinally, this reduced distensibility peaks at 1 year in KD patients and is more severe in those with persisting CA aneurysms. | - | |
21 | Sweatt et al. | Observational study | [37] | Pulmonary arterial hypertension | Patients are categorized using machine learning (consensus clustering) into proteomic immune groups (cytokines, chemokines, and factors using multiplex immunoassay). | - | Different PAH immunological phenotypes with varying clinical risks are identified by blood cytokine patterns. These characteristics may help with mechanistic research on the pathobiology of disease and offer a framework for analysing patient responses to newly developed immunotherapy treatments. |
22 | Diller et al. | Observational study | [38] | CHD (transposition of great arteries—after atrial switch procedure or congenitally corrected TGA). | Use of deep machine learning algorithms trained on routine echocardiographic to detect the diagnosis. | - | Using machine learning algorithms that have been trained on common echocardiographic datasets, it is possible to determine the underlying cause of complex CHD and to perform a continuous, automated evaluation of ventricular function. |
23 | Li et al. | Observational study | [39] | CHD | - | To find the predictors that were substantially linked with CHD, ANN models such as univariate logistic regression studies and the traditional feed-forward back-propagation neural network (BPNN) model were used. Additionally, BPNN can be utilized to forecast a person’s risk of CHD. | - |
24 | Liu et al. | Observational study | [7] | CHD | - | An RCRnet model can preliminarily identify specific types of left-to-right shunt CHD and improve screening detection rate. | - |
25 | Tandon et al. | Observational study | [40] | CHD (rTOF) | - | - | The new mostly structurally normal (MSN) algorithm + rTOF algorithm showed improvements in LV epicardial and RV endocardial contours |
26 | Samad et al. | Observational study | [41] | CHD (rTOF) | - | Regression analysis previously failed to recognize the value of baseline variables, but machine learning pipeline did. Predictive models could help organise early interventions in high-risk individuals. | - |
27 | Diller et al. | Observational study | [42] | CHD | Deep learning (DL) algorithms enhance the de-noising of transthoracic echocardiographic images and removing acoustic shadowing artefacts. | - | - |
28 | Montalt-Tordera et al. | Observational study | [43] | CHD | Deep learning can improve contrast in LD cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) without sacrificing clinical utility. | - | - |
29 | Junior et al. | Observational study | [44] | CHD | - | Random forest (0.902) (a statistical model to ascertain mortality risk) gave top performing area under the curve and gave predictive variables that represented 67.8% of importance for the risk of mortality in the random forest algorithm. | - |
30 | Siontis et al. | Observational study | [45] | Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy | A deep-learning AI model can accurately identify juvenile HCM using a typical 12 lead ECG. | - | - |
31 | Tan et al. | Observational study | [46] | CHD | It is anticipated that a novel convolution neural network-based classification algorithm for CHD will be used in machine-assisted auscultation because it has increased heart sound classification accuracy, specificity, and robustness. | - | - |
32 | Baris Bozkurt et al. | Observational study | [47] | CHD | For automatic structural heart abnormality risk detection from digital phonocardiogram (PCG) signals, sub-band envelopes are preferred to the most often utilized features, and period synchronous windowing is preferred over asynchronous windowing. | - | - |
33 | Shaan Khurshid et al. | Observational study | [48] | General description | Estimates of the left ventricle’s mass-produced by deep learning from 12-lead ECGs and associated with incident cardiovascular disease. | - | - |
34 | Sabine Ernst et al. | Observational study | [49] | Intra-atrial baffle anatomy | - | - | SVTs might be safely and effectively eliminated using remote-controlled catheter ablation by magnetic navigation employing a retrograde strategy and precise 3D image integration. |
35 | Thomas Ernest Perry et al. | Observational study | [49] | General description | To effectively and efficiently utilize the potential of textual predictors, the Laplacian eigenmap technique embeds textual predictors into a low-dimensional Euclidean space. | - | - |
36 | Nikolaos Papoutsidakis et al. | Observational study | [50] | Inherited Cardiomyopathies | In order to effectively keep providers informed about pathogenicity assessments for any previously found genetic variant, the Machine-Assisted Genotype Update System (MAGUS) method of accessing ClinVar without specification to any specific gene or variant is proposed. | - | - |
37 | Shu-Hui Yao et al. | Observational study | [51] | PDA | - | - | When therapeutic drug monitoring is unavailable, the nine-parameter ANN model is the best alternative to predict serum digoxin concentrations in PDA. |
38 | Zhoupeng Ren et al. | Observational study | [52] | CHD | - | - | This study’s use of two machine models reveals a link between CHDs in Beijing and maternal exposure to ambient particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 m (PM10). |
39 | Hui Shi et al. | Observational study | [53] | CHD | - | The ML model assists in deciding on specific therapy and nutritional follow-up strategies while making early forecasts of malnutrition in children with CHD at 1 year postoperative. | - |
40 | Lei Huang et al. | Observational study | [54] | CHD | - | - | In post-Glenn shunt patients with suspected mean pulmonary arterial pressure >15 mmHg, the preoperative cardiac computed tomography (CT)-based RF model exhibits good performance in the prediction of mean pulmonary arterial pressure, potentially reducing the requirement for right heart catheterization. |
41 | Andreas Hauptmann et al. | Observational study | [55] | CHD | Real-time radial data artefact suppression using a residual U-Net could aid in the widespread use of real-time CMR in clinical settings. Children and sick people who are unable to hold their breath would benefit most from this. | - | - |
42 | Gerhard-Paul Diller et al. | Observational study | [56] | ACHD | - | - | Machine learning algorithms that have been trained on big datasets can be useful for estimating prognosis and possibly directing therapy in ACHD. |
43 | Weize Xu et al. | Observational study | [57] | CHD | The precise classification of CHD is completed using a heart sound segmentation method based on PCG segment to achieve the segmentation of cardiac cycles. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and f1-score of classification for CHD are, respectively, 0.953, 0.946, 0.961, and 0.953, which demonstrate that the suggested technique performs competitively. | - | - |
44 | Daniel Ruiz-Fernández et al. | Observational study | [58] | Pediatric cardiac surgery | - | Future difficulties, or even death, could be prevented with the use of AI-based decision support algorithms when classifying the risk of congenital heart surgery. | - |
45 | Sukrit Narula et al. | Observational study | [59] | HOCM | Using echocardiographic data, machine learning algorithms can help distinguish between physiological and pathological remodelling patterns in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and physiological hypertrophy seen in athletes (ATH). | - | - |
46 | Sumeet Gandhi et al. | Review | [60] | Cardiology | Automation has been introduced into many vendor software systems to increase the precision and effectiveness of human echocardiogram tracings. | - | - |
47 | Kipp W Johnson et al. | Review | [61] | Cardiology | Because doctors will be able to analyze a greater volume of data in greater depth than ever before, AI will result in better patient care. Physicians will benefit from the streamlined clinical treatment provided by reinforcement learning algorithms. Unsupervised learning developments will allow for a far more thorough definition of patients’ problems, which will ultimately result in a better choice of treatments and better results. | - | - |
48 | Peter Kokol et al. | Review | [62] | Pediatric developmental disorders, oncology, emergencies | The use of AI in pediatrics led to better clinical outcomes, more precise and swifter diagnoses, better decision making, and more sensitive and specific identification of high-risk patients. | - | - |
49 | Chen Chen et al. | Review | [63] | General | Different cardiac anatomical features, such as the heart ventricle, atria, and vessels, can be segmented using deep learning algorithms that are applied in three main imaging modalities: MRI, CT, and ultrasound. | - | - |
50 | Chang AC et al. | Editorial | [64] | Pediatric heart diseases | The subspecialty that will gain the most from future technologies and AI approaches is pediatric cardiology, hands down. | - | - |
51 | Diller GP et al. | Observational study | [65] | TOF | - | Automated evaluation of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging parameters using machine learning techniques based in two dimensions to predict prognosis in TOF. | In patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot, automated analysis using machine learning algorithms may replace labor-intensively obtained imaging parameters from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) (ToF). |
52 | Eynde J et al. | Perspective article | [12] | CHD | - | When AI is combined with mechanistic models to describe complicated interactions among variables, medically based data can be utilized to identify trends and predict late problems such arrhythmias and congestive heart failure as well as survival. | |
53 | Zhang et al. | Observational study | [66] | TOF | - | - | The patch size, shape, and position optimization technique used in pulmonary artery-enlarging repair surgery using generative adversarial networks (GANs) is more accurate and produces superior clinical results. |
54 | Asmare MH et al. | Observational study | [67] | RHD | The automatic auscultation and categorization of the heart sound as being normal or rheumatic is performed using a deep learning method based on convolutional neural networks. It is not necessary to extract the first, second, or systolic and diastolic heart sounds when classifying un-segmented data. | - | - |
55 | Lakhe A et al. | Observational study | [68] | CHD | An adaptive line enhancement approach is used by a digital stethoscope to digitally amplify, record, examine, play back, and process heart sounds. | - | - |
56 | A. Arafati | Review | [69] | CHD | AI-based methods for analyzing cardiac MRI data have the potential to be very effective and error-free. | - | - |
57 | Pyles Lee at al | Observational study | [70] | CHD | The viability of using the cloud-based HeartLink system to distinguish between pathologic murmurs caused by CHD and typical functional cardiac murmurs was demonstrated in the proof-of-concept study. | - | - |
58 | Andrisevic N et al. | RCT | [71] | CHD | With a specificity of 70.5% and a sensitivity of 64.7%, an AI-based diagnostic system can distinguish between healthy, normal heart sounds and abnormal heart sounds. | - | - |
59 | M El-Segaier et al. | RCT | [72] | CHD | First and second heart sounds are detected by an AI algorithm. As benchmarks for detection, R- and T-waves were used. | - | - |
60 | Sukryool Kang et al. | Observational study | [73] | CHD | With 84–93% sensitivity and 91–99% specificity, the discussed AI algorithm correctly diagnosed Still’s murmur using the jackknife approach based on 87 Still’s murmurs and 170 non-murmurs. | - | - |
61 | Patricia Garcia-Canadilla et al. | Observational study | [74] | CHD | By enhancing picture capture, quantification, and segmentation, ML methods can enhance the evaluation of fetal cardiac function and help with the early detection of fetal cardiac anomalies and remodelling. | - | - |
62 | Hong S et al. | Review | [75] | General | ECG tasks including disease diagnosis, localization, sleep staging, biometric human identification, and denoising have all been tackled using deep learning systems. | - | - |
63 | Bodenhofer U et al. | Observational study | [76] | CHD | Machine learning technologies can more accurately predict the results of valve surgery treatments. | - | Machine learning technologies can more accurately predict the results of valve surgery treatments. |
64 | Sravani Gampala et al. | Review | [77] | CHD | AI may be useful to radiologists, but it will not replace them. | - | - |
65 | J. van den Eynde et al. | Perspective | [78] | CHD | Medicine-based evidence has the potential to transform medical decision making. | - | - |
66 | Mingming Ma et al. | Observational study | [79] | Dilated Obstructed Right Ventricle | Using intelligent navigation technology to STIC volume datasets, FINE can produce and show three unique aberrant fetal echocardiogram images with display rates of 84.0%, 76.0%, and 84.0%, respectively, and therefore may be utilised for screening and remote consultation of fetal DORV. | - | - |
67 | Zeng X et al. | Review | [80] | CHD | - | - | For effectively predicting problems during pediatric congenital heart surgery, the machine-learning-based model incorporates patient demographics, surgical factors, and intraoperative blood pressure data. |
68 | Lo Muzio FP et al. | Observational study | [81] | CHD | - | - | AI algorithms can assist surgeons in making decisions during open-chest surgery. |
69 | Simona Aufiero et al. | [82] | Congenital long QT syndrome | DL models have the potential to help cardiologists diagnose LQTS. | - | - | |
70 | Dias RD et al. | Review | [83] | Cardiology | Machine learning will be used in high-tech operating rooms to improve intra-operative and post-operative outcomes. | - | - |
71 | Wang T et al. | Observational study | [84] | Kawasaki Disease | A machine learning-based model based on patient data predicts intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease. | - | - |
72 | João Francisco B S Martins et al. | Observational study | [85] | RHD | When the advantage of a 3D convolutional neural network was compared with the benefit of 2D convolutional neural network, the accuracy was 72.77%. | - | - |
73 | Ghosh P et al. | Review | [86] | MIS-C and Kawasaki disease | Targetable cytokine pathways revealed by the ViP signatures in MIS-C and Kawasaki pinpoint crucial clinical (reduced cardiac function) and laboratory (thrombocytopenia and eosinopenia) indicators to assist monitor severity. | - | - |
Serial No. | Authors | Reference | AI Algorithms | Algorithm Functions | Pediatric Pathology Assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Rima Arnaout et. al | [68] | DL Classifier | A deep learning classifier model predicting probable diagnostic outcomes based on real-time imaging or retrospective data | Congenital heart diseases |
2 | Mori H, Inai K, et. al. | [35] | Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) & Long Short-term Memory Models (LSTM) | ECG data utilized by CNN to extract waveform shapes that are further classified by LSTM to find ECG features predicting pathology | Atrial septal defect |
3 | Zuercher M, Ufkes S, et.al. | [69] | Echo-Net Dynamic Model | Using an echocardiogram databank with other cardiac parameter data, the model predicts left ventricular ejection fractions. | LVEF defects in dilated cardiomyopathies |
4 | Sepehri AA, Hancq J, et. al. | [70] | Arash-Band Method | Specific frequency bands, Arash bands, are used to analyze heart sound energy from pathological murmurs to predict CHDs. | Congenital heart diseases |
5 | Wang SH, Wu K, Chu T, et al. | [29] | Structurally optimized Stochastic pooling convolutional neural network | Cardiac magnetic imaging data are classified based on a trained convolutional neural network that allows TOF diagnosis. | Tetralogy of Fallot |
6 | Ko WY, Siontis KC, Attia ZI, et al. | [71] | Convolutional Neural Network enabled ECG | Utilizing 12-lead ECG data to train a convolutional neural network resulting in a model that ascertains HCM diagnosis | Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy |
7 | DeGroff CG, Bhatikar S, et al. | [72] | Artificial Neural Network (ANN) | Auscultatory data fed into a trained artificial neural network allows classification of normal vs. pathological heart sounds | Pediatric heart murmurs |
8 | Na JY, Kim D, Kwon AM, et al. | [73] | Light Gradient-Boosting machine (L-GBM) | A decision tree-based algorithm that utilizes prior weaker models to classify data and predict a diagnosis | Patent ductus arteriosus |
9 | Sepehri AA, Gharehbaghi A, et. al. | [74] | Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP) Neural Network Classifier | An artificial neural network that processes input data through hidden layers to extract and sort data leading to precise segmentation of heart sounds | Pediatric heart sounds |
10 | Chou, FS., Ghimire, L.V. | [75] | Random Forest Algorithm | A supervised ML algorithm that uses decision trees that are trained using a combination of learning models to aid in precision diagnostic indicators | Pediatric myocarditis |
11 | Ali F, Hasan B, Ahmad H, et al. | [76] | Long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network | A recurrent neural network which is trained to retain and utilize past input with concurrent data to recognize patterns for diagnostic predictions | Pediatric rheumatic heart disease |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sethi, Y.; Patel, N.; Kaka, N.; Desai, A.; Kaiwan, O.; Sheth, M.; Sharma, R.; Huang, H.; Chopra, H.; Khandaker, M.U.; et al. Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Cardiology: A Scoping Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7072. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237072
Sethi Y, Patel N, Kaka N, Desai A, Kaiwan O, Sheth M, Sharma R, Huang H, Chopra H, Khandaker MU, et al. Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Cardiology: A Scoping Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(23):7072. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237072
Chicago/Turabian StyleSethi, Yashendra, Neil Patel, Nirja Kaka, Ami Desai, Oroshay Kaiwan, Mili Sheth, Rupal Sharma, Helen Huang, Hitesh Chopra, Mayeen Uddin Khandaker, and et al. 2022. "Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Cardiology: A Scoping Review" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 23: 7072. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237072
APA StyleSethi, Y., Patel, N., Kaka, N., Desai, A., Kaiwan, O., Sheth, M., Sharma, R., Huang, H., Chopra, H., Khandaker, M. U., Lashin, M. M. A., Hamd, Z. Y., & Emran, T. B. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Cardiology: A Scoping Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(23), 7072. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237072