Next Article in Journal
Influence of Photodynamic Therapy on Lichen Sclerosus with Neoplastic Background
Previous Article in Journal
Association of Neuroretinal Thinning and Microvascular Changes with Hypertension in an Older Population in Southern Italy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/jcm11041099
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rapid Genetic Diagnosis for Okinawan Patients with Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct Using Single-Stranded Tag Hybridization Chromatographic Printed-Array Strip

by
Akira Ganaha
1,*,
Eiji Hishinuma
2,3,
Tadashi Kaname
4,
Masahiro Hiratsuka
2,3,5,6,
Shunsuke Kondo
7 and
Tetsuya Tono
1
1
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki 889-1692, Japan
2
Advanced Research Center for Innovations in Next-Generation Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8573, Japan
3
Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8573, Japan
4
Department of Genome Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo 157-8535, Japan
5
Laboratory of Pharmacotherapy of Life-Style Related Diseases, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan
6
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai 980-8574, Japan
7
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(4), 1099; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11041099
Submission received: 19 January 2022 / Revised: 11 February 2022 / Accepted: 17 February 2022 / Published: 19 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Otolaryngology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Both Pendred syndrome (PS) and nonsyndromic hearing loss with an enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) are autosomal recessive disorders caused by SLC26A4 pathogenic variants. The spectrum of SLC26A4 pathogenic variants varies with the ethnic background. Among the patients with EVA in Okinawa, 94% had some combination of NM_000441.2(SLC26A4):c.1707+5G>A and NM_000441.2(SLC26A4):c.2168A>G(p.His723Arg), the two SLC26A4 pathogenic variants that are the most common in this population. We identified these two pathogenic variants using a novel genotyping method that employed an allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from a gDNA and single-stranded tag hybridization chromatographic printed-array strip (STH-PAS) in DNA samples obtained from 48 samples in Okinawa, including 34 patients with EVA and 14 carriers of c.1707+5G>A or c.2168A>G. In addition, whole blood and saliva samples were used for analysis in this genotyping method with direct PCR. The results of STH-PAS genotyping were consistent with those obtained using standard Sanger sequencing for all samples. The accuracy of the STH-PAS method is 100% under the optimized conditions. STH-PAS genotyping provided a diagnosis in 30 out of 34 patients (88%) in Okinawan patients with EVA in under 3 h. The turn-around time for STH-PAS genotyping used with direct PCR was 2 h as a result of the omission of the DNA extraction and purification steps. Using information about the ethnic distribution of pathogenic variants in the SLC26A4 gene, STH-PAS genotyping performs a rapid genetic diagnosis that is simple and has a considerably improved efficiency.

1. Introduction

An enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) is a common inner ear malformation in patients with hearing loss that is frequently associated with Pendred syndrome (PS) [1,2]. PS is characterized by congenital sensorineural hearing loss with EVA and goiter [3]. Both nonsyndromic hearing loss with EVA and PS are autosomal recessive disorders caused by pathogenic variants in the SLC26A4 gene [4]. SLC26A4 is the second-most common gene associated with deafness among Japanese patients [5]. A difference in the ethnic distribution of the spectrum of pathogenic variants in SLC26A4 was revealed in previous studies [6,7]. Whereas only approximately 25% of Caucasian patients with EVA were identified with two pathogenic variants in SLC26A4 [8,9,10], this fraction is much higher, at 67–90%, in the Asian population [11,12,13,14,15]. In Japan, NM_000441.2(SLC26A4):c.2168A>G(p.His723Arg) (Table 1) is the most common SLC26A4 pathogenic variant, associated with 36.0% of patients. The second is NM_000441.2(SLC26A4):c.919-2A>G, with 7.0%, followed by NM_000441.2(SLC26A4):c.1707+5G>A (Table 1), with 4.0% of patients [12]. The Okinawa Islands are the southwestern-most islands of the Japanese archipelago (Figure 1), whose population carries a different spectrum of SLC26A4 pathogenic variants than other populations [16]. One notable feature of this genetic difference is the SLC26A4 pathogenic variant c.1707+5G>A (Table 1), which is the most common pathogenic variant uniquely reported in patients with EVA in the Okinawa Islands [16]. Previous genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) data indicate a difference in clusters between mainland Japan (Hondo cluster) and the Okinawa Islands (Ryukyu cluster) [17]. According to a publicly accessible whole genome reference database of 14,000 healthy Japanese individuals [18], the allele frequencies of the c.1707+5G>A and c.2186A>G pathogenic variants are 0.00014 and 0.00205, respectively. Thus, in the general population of Japan, and in contrast to the Okinawans, the allele frequency of the c.1707+5G>A pathogenic variant is much lower than that of c.2186A>G. This suggests that the high frequency of the c.1707+5G>A pathogenic variant is due to a founder effect [16].
To date, the various genotyping methods for detecting point mutations, including Sanger sequencing, polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), allele specific PCR, TaqMan real-time PCR, invader assay and microarray, have been used [19,20,21,22,23]. These techniques require expensive instrumentation and technical expertise for reliable outcomes [24]. Recently, a genotyping method was developed that employs allele-specific PCR and a single-stranded tag hybridization chromatographic printed-array strip (STH-PAS) [25]. STH-PAS genotyping does not require electrophoresis or DNA sequencing, providing the results in under 15 min after allele-specific PCR. This rapid and efficient method is capable of a safe and high-sensitivity visualization of multiplex DNA signals [24,25].
Herein, we report a protocol that uses allele-specific PCR and STH-PAS and is optimized to genotypically identify the c.1707+5G>A and c.2168A>G pathogenic variants, the two most common pathogenic variants of SLC26A4 in patients with EVA in the Okinawa Islands. In addition, we evaluated the feasibility of a novel genotyping method that applies direct PCR and STH-PAS to whole blood and saliva samples.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

The DNA samples of a total of 48 Okinawan samples were analyzed. All patients were diagnosed with hearing loss in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery of the University of the Ryukyus, Japan. Of these, 34 were diagnosed with PS or EVA, and, by genotype, they included twelve with compound heterozygous pathogenic variants for c.1707+5G>A and c.2168A>G, nine with homozygous pathogenic variant of c.1707+5G>A, nine with homozygous pathogenic variant for c.2168A>G, two with compound heterozygous pathogenic variant for c.2168A>G and some other SLC26A4 pathogenic variants and two genetically undiagnosed (Table 2). In addition, 14 DNA samples were examined as a carrier of c.1707+5G>A or c.2168A>G, including three samples with heterozygous pathogenic variant for c.1707+5G>A and eleven with heterozygous pathogenic variant for c.2168A>G. For ground truth, prior Sanger sequencing confirmed c.1707+5G>A and/or c.2168A>G in SLC26A4 in all samples. Whole blood and saliva samples from one Okinawan patient with compound heterozygous for c.1707+5G>A and c.2168A>G were examined by direct PCR and STH-PAS genotyping without nucleic acid extraction.

2.2. Primer Design

The sequence of primers used for PCR amplification is listed in Table 3. The forward primer was labeled with a tag-spacer sequence at its 5′ end for detection with STH-PAS. The nucleotide at the 3′ end of each forward primer was changed according to each mutation to be used for allele-specific PCR. Each reverse primer was labeled with biotin at its 5′ end. In the forward primers, except c.1707_Fw_Vt, the nucleotides immediately before the 3′ end were modified to become different sequences to avoid nonspecific amplification [26]. In the c.1707_Fw_Vt primer, we could not adopt the mismatched nucleotide at position −1 of its 3′ end because of low PCR amplification. Instead, we added an extra nucleotide, T, at position +1 of its 3′ end, to improve the PCR amplification.

2.3. PCR Amplification from gDNA

DNA was extracted using the Qiagen DNA Extraction Kit (Qiagen; Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and quantified using high-sensitivity spectrophotometry (Nano Drop 1000, Labtech Ltd.; East Sussex, UK).
Multiplex single-tube PCR amplification was performed using a 20 μL reaction mixture of 4 components, including (i) distilled water (6 µL); (ii) genomic DNA samples (1 µL; 10 ng/μL), (iii) 2× KAPA2G Fast Multiplex Mix (Kapa Biosystems; Massachusetts, USA) (10 μL) and (iv) primer mixture (3 μL; 5 μM), c.1707_Fw_Wt, c.1707_Fw_Vr, c.1707_Rv, c.2168_Fw_Wt, c.2168_Fw_Vr and c.2168_Rv.
PCR was performed under the following condition: (i) initial denaturation step (95 °C; 3 min) and (ii) 28 cycles of the 3-step (95 °C; 15 s) → (60 °C; 30 s) → (72 °C; 30 s) sequence in the PCR Thermal Cycler (GeneAlas G02, Astec, Fukuoka, Japan).
Stability of this protocol was confirmed with PCR performed at a higher (50 ng/uL) and lower (5 ng/uL) DNA concentration at different annealing temperatures (59–60 °C or 61 °C).

2.4. Direct PCR Amplification from Whole Blood and Saliva Samples

PCR using whole blood and saliva samples was performed in a direct sample processing method in which samples are added to the amplification reaction without prior extraction or quantification of DNA. Briefly, whole blood was collected into EDTA tubes, and saliva into FastGeneTM centrifuge tubes (Nippon Genetics, Tokyo, Japan). To each sample, 0.1 mL of DNAzol Direct reagent (Molecular Research Center Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA) was mixed using the manufacturer’s protocol, and the mixture was incubated (80 °C; 10 min) before being directly subjected to PCR.
The amplification protocol was identical for both types of sample. The reactions were initially performed using a reaction mixture of 20 μL composed of 2 μL of the DNA template, prepared as described earlier. The PCR procedure followed a sequence of (i) initial denaturation step (95 °C; 3 min), followed by (ii) 31 cycles of the 3-step (95 °C; 15 s) → (60 °C; 30 s) → (72 °C; 30 s). The difference from the sequence used for gDNA amplification was 3 extra cycles.

2.5. Dipstick DNA Chromatography

Dipstick DNA chromatography printed array (C-PAS) strips and reagents were obtained commercially (TBA Co.; Sendai, Japan). STH-PAS genotyping was performed in a 20 µL mixture of 4 components, including (i) separation buffer (10 µL), (ii) distilled water (8 µL), (iii) streptavidin-coated blue latex suspension (1 µL) and (iv) the PCR product (1 µL). The C-PAS strip was dipped and held into this mixture (10 min at room temperature) to facilitate the reaction, in which, streptavidin-coated blue latex reacted to combine with the biotin at the 5′ end of the amplicons. Hybridization of each forward primer with the oligonucleotides complementary to their 5′ terminal tags, printed on lines at distinct position along the C-PAS membrane, appears as a visible blue line in a distinct position (Figure 2a). Essentially, the assay reveals different genotypes in SLC26A4 in a “bar code” made of the blue lines. The diagnosis of the genotype for each sample was based on the pattern of blue lines on the STH-PAS (Figure 2a) made through visual inspection.

3. Results

We studied 34 patients who were clinically diagnosed with hearing loss and EVA. Table 2 summarizes the patients’ SLC26A4 genotypes, as well as phenotypes of gender, affected side, vertigo, goiter and hearing level. No significant differences were expected in the distributions of phenotypes among the five genotype groups, owing to the small sample of 34 patients.
The genotypes of the 34 patients with Sanger-detected SLC26A4 pathogenic variants were determined by the STH-PAS protocol described here using 10 ng/μL of their gDNA. Representative results from seven samples are shown in Figure 2b. No false positives or false negatives were identified. All of the results of 48 samples, including 34 patients and 14 carriers, were consistent with Sanger sequencing (Supplementary Figure S1).
To test the stability of the STH-PAS protocol, control experiments were conducted with two different concentrations of template DNA and three different annealing temperatures. The results are summarized in Figure 3. Except for the false-positive results observed at a high (50 ng/μL) DNA concentration at the annealing temperature of 59 °C (marked by red arrows in Figure 3a), the STH-PAS genotyping protocol worked without false positives or false negatives in a large concentration range of template DNA at annealing temperatures of 60–61 °C (Figure 3b–f).
Only one patient had both whole blood and saliva samples collected. The patient’s genotype was determined by the direct PCR and STH-PAS protocol described here, using whole blood (Figure 4a) and saliva (Figure 4b), in addition to the genotyping by PCR and STH-PAS using gDNA (Figure 2b, lane 2). The results of STH-PAS genotyping using direct PCR were consistent with those obtained using standard Sanger sequencing (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

With a focus on Okinawan patients with EVA, we developed a rapid genotyping method that targets SLC26A4 pathogenic variants c.1707+5G>A and c.2168A>G using allele-specific PCR and STH-PAS. The STH-PAS genotyping does not involve electrophoresis and DNA sequencing, providing results within 3 h. Furthermore, the STH-PAS genotyping used with direct PCR provides results even faster, within 2 h, owing to the circumvention of the steps of DNA extraction and purification. Interpreting the results of genotyping is as simple as reading off bar codes. The sample preprocessing required for STH-PAS, including DNA extraction and PCR amplification, costs approximately USED 7–8 per sample [24]. Thus, by saving effort and time, the STH-PAS method represents an improvement over alternative genotyping assays used to detect specific genetic variations. In addition, STH-PAS is safe because the PCR amplicons are visualized as a blue line on the C-PAS without relying on ethidium bromide, a chemical identified as a safety risk with carcinogenic effects [27,28].
Apart from the clear advantages of STH-PAS genotyping, there is a definite limit to this method. There are, at most, twelve test lines currently available on the C-PAS, and four lines were used in this study; this is sufficient to detect the presence or absence of no more than six pathogenic variants. Thus, with current C-PAS strips, the STH-PAS genotyping method is not useful when the genetic diagnosis requires the identification of more than six variants.
Ensuring the robustness of a rapid assay is essential. It was reported that STH-PAS genotyping had a 100% sensitivity and specificity [24,25]. Correct DNA-template binding, i.e., restricting binding only to the template with perfect complement, is a highly temperature-sensitive step in the PCR protocol, balancing the trade-off between two objectives. A low annealing temperature leads to a lower primer specificity binding with a template DNA [29]. Meanwhile, high annealing temperature leads to a weakly amplified reaction [29]. Thus, to ensure that we operated at the optimized annealing temperature, multiplex single-tube PCR amplification was performed, probing different annealing temperatures in a narrow range (59–61 °C). Based on our results, the annealing temperature in the multiplex PCR should be set to 60 °C; the method used at lower temperatures could produce false positives.
To avoid the nonspecific annealing of primers, another parameter, the number of PCR amplification cycles, was also adjusted, and 26–30 was identified as the adequate range. The method was less sensitive to DNA concentrations, working well under low concentrations and producing accurate results in a broad range (5 to 50 ng/μL). Tian et al. also reported that PCR-dipstick DNA chromatography could detect quantities of DNA amplicons as low as 100 pg and could demonstrate a higher sensitivity than PCR-agarose gel electrophoresis [25]. Thus, DNA chromatography has a high sensitivity and the optimization of the PCR protocol is critical for obtaining accurate results.
Performing PCR directly on whole blood or saliva samples can help to circumvent the extraction of gDNA from the sample, which has substantial benefits in terms of the time required and effort expended [30]. This simplified approach also minimizes sample-to-sample contamination despite skipping multiple steps usually required for manual extraction [30]. Saliva is a viable DNA source for genotyping studies [31], and, unlike methods collecting blood samples, saliva sampling is non-invasive and does not require trained medical personnel. Furthermore, saliva presents a lower risk of infection than blood [31]. We showed that the accuracy of genotyping by STH-PAS used with direct PCR from whole blood and saliva samples was comparable to that obtained by Sanger sequencing of DNA extracted from blood. Thus, coupling the STH-PAS genotyping method with direct PCR from whole blood or saliva is a feasible, safe and non-invasive option, presenting multiple benefits in clinical practice.
The ethnicity-specific STH-PAS genotyping based on the distribution of pathogenic variants in SLC26A4 improves the efficiency of a genetic diagnosis in patients with EVA. At most, the presence or absence of six pathogenic variants could be identified with a single C-PAS membrane. Whereas identification of the most frequent six SLC26A4 pathogenic variants allows for a genetic diagnosis of 94% (32/34) in Okinawan patients in this study, the diagnostic rate of the same approach is estimated to vary from 34–73% in East Asian patients with EVA, given the prevalence of pathogenic variants in SLC26A4 previously revealed in these populations [12,14,32]. Thus, an STH-PAS genotyping method appropriately tailored to the genetic variations in targeted ethnicities could be applied broadly in East Asia. Meanwhile, it is difficult to apply the STH-PAS genotyping for diagnosis in Caucasians because only approximately 25% of Caucasian patients with EVA were identified with two pathogenic variants in SLC26A4 [8,9,10].
One limitation of our study is its design, targeting only c.1707+5G>A and c.2168A>G, the two most common SLC26A4 pathogenic variants in Okinawan patients with EVA. Another one is the small sample size overall; and the third one is the sample-keeping procedure, which limited us to one patient and one control in order to evaluate the combined direct PCR and STH-PAS test. Thus, a further study using a larger number of patients with EVA is necessary to firmly establish the accuracy of our novel rapid genotyping method.

5. Conclusions

We developed a multiplex variant detection method by combining allele-specific PCR with STH-PAS to verify the presence or absence of the two SLC26A4 pathogenic variants, c.1707+5G>A and c.2168A>G, that are the most common among Okinawan patients with hearing loss and EVA. Furthermore, by combining direct PCR and STH-PAS from whole blood and saliva specimens, we developed a novel, rapid and less invasive genotyping method. The diagnostic accuracy of STH-PAS genotyping for the two pathogenic variants was 88% correct in Okinawan patients with EVA. The STH-PAS genotyping method appropriately tailored to the genetic variations in targeted ethnicities could be applied broadly in other geographical regions.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm11041099/s1: Figure S1: Results of the STH-PAS genetic analysis in all 48 samples for c.1707+5G>A and p.H723R in SLC26A4.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G.; methodology, E.H. and M.H.; data analysis, T.T., S.K.; conducting the experiments, A.G.; resources, A.G. and T.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G.; writing—review and editing, A.G., M.H. and T.K.; project administration, A.G.; funding acquisition, A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Number JP20K18316.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Miyazaki (registration number: G-0087, 20 October 2020) and the University of the Ryukyus (registration number: 271, 21 December 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

We thank all subjects for their participation in this study. We are grateful to K. Yoza from the University of the Ryukyus and T. Yuji from the University of Miyazaki for their assistance in this study. All individuals included in this section have consented to the acknowledgement.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Johnsen, T.; Jørgensen, M.B.; Johnsen, S. Mondini cochlea in Pendred’s syndrome. A histological study. Acta Oto-Laryngol. 1986, 102, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nakagawa, O.; Ito, S.; Hanyu, O.; Yamazaki, M.; Urushiyama, M.; Tani, N.; Shibata, A. Female siblings with Pendred’s syndrome. Intern. Med. 1994, 33, 369–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Pendred, V. Deaf-mutation and goiter. Lancet 1896, 2, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Usami, S.; Abe, S.; Weston, M.D.; Shinkawa, H.; Van Camp, G.V.; Kimberling, W.J. Non-syndromic hearing loss associated with enlarged vestibular aqueduct is caused by PDS mutations. Hum. Genet. 1999, 104, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Usami, S.; Nishio, S.Y.; Nagano, M.; Abe, S.; Yamaguchi, T. Deafness Gene Study Consortium Simultaneous screening of multiple mutations by invader assay improves molecular diagnosis of hereditary hearing loss: A multicenter study. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tsukamoto, K.; Suzuki, H.; Harada, D.; Namba, A.; Abe, S.; Usami, S. Distribution and frequencies of PDS (SLC26A4) mutations in Pendred syndrome and nonsyndromic hearing loss associated with enlarged vestibular aqueduct: A unique spectrum of mutations in Japanese. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2003, 11, 916–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Tsukada, K.; Nishio, S.Y.; Hattori, M.; Usami, S. Ethnic-specific spectrum of GJB2 and SLC26A4 mutations: Their origin and a literature review. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2015, 124, 61S–76S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Campbell, C.; Cucci, R.A.; Prasad, S.; Green, G.E.; Edeal, J.B.; Galer, C.E.; Karniski, L.P.; Sheffield, V.C.; Smith, R.J. Pendred syndrome, DFNB4, and PDS/SLC26A4 identification of eight novel mutations and possible genotype-phenotype correlations. Hum. Mutat. 2001, 17, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Albert, S.; Blons, H.; Jonard, L.; Feldmann, D.; Chauvin, P.; Loundon, N.; Sergent-Allaoui, A.; Houang, M.; Joannard, A.; Schmerber, S.; et al. SLC26A4 gene is frequently involved in nonsyndromic hearing impairment with enlarged vestibular aqueduct in Caucasian populations. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 14, 773–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pryor, S.; Madeo, A.C.; Reynolds, J.C.; Sarlis, N.J.; Arnos, K.S.; Nance, W.E.; Yang, Y.; Zalewski, C.K.; Brewer, C.C.; Butman, J.A.; et al. SLC26A4/PDS genotype-phenotype correlation in hearing loss with enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct (EVA): Evidence that Pendred syndrome and non-syndromic EVA are distinct clinical and genetic entities. J. Med. Genet. 2005, 42, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Choi, B.Y.; Stewart, A.K.; Nishimura, K.K.; Cha, W.J.; Seong, M.W.; Park, S.S.; Kim, S.W.; Chun, Y.S.; Chung, J.W.; Park, S.N.; et al. Efficient molecular genetic diagnosis of enlarged vestibular aqueducts in East Asians. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomark. 2009, 13, 679–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Miyagawa, M.; Nishio, S.Y.; Usami, S. Mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlation of hearing loss patients caused by SLC26A4 mutations in the Japanese: A large cohort study. J. Hum. Genet. 2014, 59, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Reyes, S.; Wang, G.; Ouyang, X.; Han, B.; Du, L.L.; Yuan, H.J.; Yan, D.; Dai, P.; Liu, X.Z. Mutation analysis of SLC26A4 in mainland Chinese patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2009, 141, 502–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Wang, Q.J.; Zhao, Y.L.; Rao, S.Q.; Guo, Y.F.; Yuan, H.; Zong, L.; Guan, J.; Xu, B.C.; Wang, D.Y.; Han, M.K.; et al. A distinct spectrum of SLC26A4 mutations in patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct in China. Clin. Genet. 2007, 72, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhao, F.F.; Lan, L.; Wang, D.Y.; Han, B.; Qi, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zong, L.; Li, Q.; Wang, Q.J. Correlation analysis of genotypes, auditory function, and vestibular size in Chinese children with enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Acta Otolaryngol. 2013, 133, 1242–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ganaha, A.; Kaname, T.; Yanagi, K.; Naritomi, K.; Tono, T.; Usami, S.; Suzuki, M. Pathogenic substitution of IVS15 + 5G > A in SLC26A4 in patients of Okinawa Islands with enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome or Pendred syndrome. BMC Med. Genet. 2013, 14, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Yamaguchi-Kabata, Y.; Nakazono, K.; Takahashi, A.; Saito, S.; Hosono, N.; Kubo, M.; Nakamura, Y.; Kamatani, N. Japanese population structure, based on SNP genotypes from 7003 individuals compared to other ethnic groups: Effects on population- based association studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2008, 83, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Japanese Multi Omics Reference Panel. Available online: https://jmorp.megabank.tohoku.ac.jp/202112/ (accessed on 30 December 2021).
  19. Newton, C.R.; Graham, A.; Heptinstall, L.E.; Powell, S.J.; Summers, C.; Kalsheker, N.; Smith, J.C.; Markham, A.F. Analysis of any point mutation in DNA. The amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS). Nucleic Acids Res. 1989, 17, 2503–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Livak, K.J.; Marmaro, J.; Todd, J.A. Towards fully automated genome-wide polymorphism screening. Nat. Genet. 1995, 9, 341–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fujii, K.; Matsubara, Y.; Akanuma, J.; Takahashi, K.; Kure, S.; Suzuki, Y.; Imaizumi, M.; Iinuma, K.; Sakatsume, O.; Rinaldo, P.; et al. Mutation detection by Taqman-allele-specific amplification: Application to molecular diagnosis of glycogen storage disease type Ia and medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. Hum. Mutat. 2000, 15, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kwiatkowski, R.W.; Lyamichev, V.; de Arruda, M.; Neri, B. Clinical, genetic, and pharmacogenetic applications of the Invader assay. Mol. Diagn. 1999, 4, 353–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pastinen, T.; Raitio, M.; Lindroos, K.; Tainola, P.; Peltonen, L.; Syvänen, A.C. A system for specific, high-throughput genotyping by allele-specific primer extension on microarrays. Genome Res. 2000, 10, 1031–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Kumondai, M.; Ito, A.; Hishinuma, E.; Kikuchi, A.; Saito, T.; Takahashi, M.; Tsukada, C.; Saito, S.; Yasuda, J.; Nagasaki, M.; et al. Development and application of a rapid and sensitive genotyping method for pharmacogene variants using the single-stranded tag hybridization chromatographic printed-array strip (STH-PAS). Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 2018, 33, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tian, L.; Sato, T.; Niwa, K.; Kawase, M.; Tanner, A.C.; Takahashi, N. Rapid and sensitive PCR-dipstick DNA chromatography for multiplex analysis of the oral microbiota. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 180323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hiratsuka, M.; Agatsuma, Y.; Omori, F.; Narahara, K.; Inoue, T.; Kishikawa, Y.; Mizugaki, M. High throughput detection of drug-metabolizing enzyme polymorphisms by allele-specific fluorogenic 5′ nuclease chain reaction assay. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2000, 23, 1131–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. McCann, J.; Ames, B.N. Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella/microsome test: Assay of 300 chemicals: Discussion: Discussion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1976, 73, 950–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Singer, V.L.; Lawlor, T.E.; Yue, S. Comparison of SYBR Green I nucleic acid gel stain mutagenicity and ethidium bromide mutagenicity in the Salmonella/mammalian microsome reverse mutation assay (Ames test). Mutat. Res. 1999, 439, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Roux, K.H. Optimization and troubleshooting in PCR. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2009, 2009, pdb.ip66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Bu, Y.; Huang, H.; Zhou, G. Direct polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from human whole blood and filter-paper-dried blood by using a PCR buffer with a higher pH. Anal. Biochem. 2008, 375, 370–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Looi, M.L.; Zakaria, H.; Osman, J.; Jamal, R. Quantity and quality assessment of DNA extracted from saliva and blood. Clin. Lab. 2012, 58, 307–312. [Google Scholar]
  32. Rah, Y.C.; Kim, A.R.; Koo, J.W.; Lee, J.H.; Oh, S.H.; Choi, B.Y. Audiologic presentation of enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct according to the SLC26A4 genotypes. Laryngoscope 2015, 125, E216–E222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcm 11 01099 g001 550
Figure 1. Geographic location of the Okinawa Islands: this string of small islands is situated between the Japanese island of Kyushu and Taiwan.
Figure 1. Geographic location of the Okinawa Islands: this string of small islands is situated between the Japanese island of Kyushu and Taiwan.
Jcm 11 01099 g001
Jcm 11 01099 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Schematic diagram of the STH-PAS genetic analysis. (b) Results of PCR amplicon signals detected by STH-PAS for seven subjects that are representative of the entire group of patients. Red lines are positional markers. Blue lines indicate the presence of pathogenic variants. The genotype, represented by the pattern of blue lines, was summarized at the bottom of each lane. NC, negative control; −, template pathogenic variant absent; +, template pathogenic variant carrier.
Figure 2. (a) Schematic diagram of the STH-PAS genetic analysis. (b) Results of PCR amplicon signals detected by STH-PAS for seven subjects that are representative of the entire group of patients. Red lines are positional markers. Blue lines indicate the presence of pathogenic variants. The genotype, represented by the pattern of blue lines, was summarized at the bottom of each lane. NC, negative control; −, template pathogenic variant absent; +, template pathogenic variant carrier.
Jcm 11 01099 g002
Jcm 11 01099 g003 550
Figure 3. Stability test of the STH-PAS genetic analysis for the c.1707+5G>A and p.H723R pathogenic variants in SLC26A4. Each panel summarizes results obtained at a different pair of conditions. Rows are organized by template DNA concentration: top row (a–c), high (50 ng/μL); bottom row (d–f), low (5 ng/μL). Similarly, columns are organized by annealing temperature: left (a,d), 59 °C; middle (b,e), 60 °C; and right (c,f), 61 °C. Red arrowheads (strips 4, 5, 6 in a) indicate false positives. NC, negative control; −, template pathogenic variant absent; +, template pathogenic variant carrier.
Figure 3. Stability test of the STH-PAS genetic analysis for the c.1707+5G>A and p.H723R pathogenic variants in SLC26A4. Each panel summarizes results obtained at a different pair of conditions. Rows are organized by template DNA concentration: top row (a–c), high (50 ng/μL); bottom row (d–f), low (5 ng/μL). Similarly, columns are organized by annealing temperature: left (a,d), 59 °C; middle (b,e), 60 °C; and right (c,f), 61 °C. Red arrowheads (strips 4, 5, 6 in a) indicate false positives. NC, negative control; −, template pathogenic variant absent; +, template pathogenic variant carrier.
Jcm 11 01099 g003
Jcm 11 01099 g004 550
Figure 4. Results of the STH-PAS genetic analysis for c.1707+5G>A and p.H723R in SLC26A4 using direct PCR from samples of (a) whole blood and (b) saliva of a single patient (strip 1) and two controls (strips 2 and 3). The genotype of each lane was presented in the bottom graphics. NC, negative control; −, template pathogenic variant absent; +, template pathogenic variant carrier.
Figure 4. Results of the STH-PAS genetic analysis for c.1707+5G>A and p.H723R in SLC26A4 using direct PCR from samples of (a) whole blood and (b) saliva of a single patient (strip 1) and two controls (strips 2 and 3). The genotype of each lane was presented in the bottom graphics. NC, negative control; −, template pathogenic variant absent; +, template pathogenic variant carrier.
Jcm 11 01099 g004
Table
Table 1. Details of the target pathogenic variants.
Table 1. Details of the target pathogenic variants.
NM_000441.2(SLC26A4):c.2168A>G(p.His723Arg)NM_000441.2(SLC26A4):c.1707+5G>A
Positionchr7:107710132chr7:107700180
Reference SNP numberrs121908362rs192366176
NucleotideNC_000007.13:g.107350577A>GNC_000007.13:g.107340625G>A
Functional consequenceLoss of function variantSequence variant affecting splicing
Table
Table 2. Distribution of SLC26A4 genotypes and phenotypes in 34 patients.
Table 2. Distribution of SLC26A4 genotypes and phenotypes in 34 patients.
GenotypesPatientsGender
(M: F)		Bilateral:
Unilateral		VertigoGoiterThreshold (dB)
RightLeft
c.1707+5G>A homozygote9 (26.5%)3: 69: 06 (67%)6 (67%)96.6 100.0
c.2168A>G homozygote9 (26.5%)4: 59: 05 (56%)4 (44%)98.2 91.3
c.1707+5G>A/c.2168A>G12 (35.3%)4: 811: 17 (58%)6 (50%)95.6 101.5
c.2168A>G/c.1579A>C1 (2.9%)0: 11: 01191.7 71.7
c.2168A>G/c.1229C>T1 (2.9%)1: 01: 010101.7 95.0
Undiagnosed2 (5.9%)0: 20: 20057.0 57.0
Total3412: 2231: 3201890.186.1
Table
Table 3. Allele-specific PCR primers.
Table 3. Allele-specific PCR primers.
VariantPrimer NamePrimer Sequence (5′–3′)Size (bp)
c.2168A>Gc.2168_Fw_Wt[Tag 5]-spacer-
GGACACATTCTTTTTGACGGTCGA		219
c.2168_Fw_Vt[Tag 6]-spacer-
GGACACATTCTTTTTGACGGTCTG
c.2168_Rv[Biotin]-TGAGGCTCCATGAAGTTATATAGG
c.1707+5G>Ac.1707_Fw_Wt[Tag 7]-spacer-
AATGTATCAAGTCCACAGTAGG		361
c.1707_Fw_Vt[Tag 8]-spacer-
AATGTATCAAGTCCACAGTAAAT
c.1707_Rv[Biotin]-GCACAAAGCCTGTTAGTCCA
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ganaha, A.; Hishinuma, E.; Kaname, T.; Hiratsuka, M.; Kondo, S.; Tono, T. Rapid Genetic Diagnosis for Okinawan Patients with Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct Using Single-Stranded Tag Hybridization Chromatographic Printed-Array Strip. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11041099

AMA Style

Ganaha A, Hishinuma E, Kaname T, Hiratsuka M, Kondo S, Tono T. Rapid Genetic Diagnosis for Okinawan Patients with Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct Using Single-Stranded Tag Hybridization Chromatographic Printed-Array Strip. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(4):1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11041099

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ganaha, Akira, Eiji Hishinuma, Tadashi Kaname, Masahiro Hiratsuka, Shunsuke Kondo, and Tetsuya Tono. 2022. "Rapid Genetic Diagnosis for Okinawan Patients with Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct Using Single-Stranded Tag Hybridization Chromatographic Printed-Array Strip" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 4: 1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11041099

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop