Next Article in Journal
Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
EYERUBBICS: The Eye Rubbing Cycle Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Risk of Migraine after Traumatic Brain Injury and Effects of Injury Management Levels and Treatment Modalities: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan

1
Department of Medical Education and Research, Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan
2
Department of Neurology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
3
Department of Medical Research, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
4
School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
5
Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Cardinal Tien Hospital, School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 231, Taiwan
6
Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan
7
Master Program of Big Data in Biomedicine, School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242, Taiwan
8
Department of Medical Education and Research, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City 231, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(4), 1530; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041530
Submission received: 31 December 2022 / Revised: 4 February 2023 / Accepted: 12 February 2023 / Published: 15 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Brain Injury)

Abstract

:
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes several long-term disabilities, particularly headaches. An association between TBI and subsequent migraine has been reported. However, few longitudinal studies have explained the link between migraine and TBI. Moreover, the modifying effects of treatment remain unknown. This retrospective cohort study used records from Taiwan’s Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005 to evaluate the risk of migraine among patients with TBI and to determine the effects of different treatment modalities. Initially, 187,906 patients, aged ≥ 18 years, who were diagnosed as TBI in 2000, were identified. In total, 151,098 patients with TBI and 604,394 patients without TBI were matched at a 1:4 ratio according to baseline variables during the same observation period. At the end of follow-up, 541 (0.36%) and 1491 (0.23%) patients in the TBI and non-TBI groups, respectively, developed migraine. The TBI group exhibited a higher risk of migraine than the non-TBI group (adjusted HR: 1.484). Major trauma (Injury Severity Score, ISS ≥ 16) was associated with a higher migraine risk than minor trauma (ISS < 16) (adjusted HR: 1.670). However, migraine risk did not differ significantly after surgery or occupational/physical therapy. These findings highlight the importance of long-term follow-up after TBI onset and the need to investigate the underlying pathophysiological link between TBI and subsequent migraine.

1. Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is defined as the disruption of brain function or other evidence of brain pathology caused by an external physical force [1]. TBI results in more deaths and disabilities than any other traumatic insult worldwide [2]. The estimated annual occurrence of TBI varies widely, ranging from 2.5 million in the European Union to 3.5 million in the USA [3]. Due to increased road traffic, the incidence is typically higher in developing countries [4,5,6]. For example, in India, TBI causes an estimated 1 million disabilities annually and accounts for one fatality every three minutes [3].
TBI causes not only short-term impairment, but also persistent and even life-long consequences [7]. Negative outcomes following TBI include persistent postconcussive symptoms (PCS) [8], neurodegenerative disorders [9], psychological disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [10], psychiatric sequelae [11], sleep disturbances [12], autonomic dysfunction [13], and suboptimal health-related quality of life, particularly in women [14]. Of these, headache is one of the most common postconcussive disorders [15]. Moreover, among the various etiologies of headache, TBI has been suggested to be a risk factor for migraine [15,16,17].
Migraine is a primary headache with a 1-year prevalence of up to 15% in the general population [18]. It is characterized by recurrent attacks of headache with a range of accompanying symptoms. By contrast, post-traumatic headache (PTH) is a secondary headache attributed to trauma or injury to the head or neck. PTH can be classified as acute if it develops within seven days after a TBI and resolves within three months, or it can be classified as chronic if it persists for more than three months [19]. The most common PTH patterns resemble two primary headache disorders, migraine or probable migraine and tension-type headaches. However, migraine is more prevalent [13].
At present, effective treatment for TBI is lacking [20,21]. Nonetheless, standard medical and surgical interventions play a significant role in the acute management for TBI. Surgical intervention is usually warranted when a significant mass effect occurs that results from a hematoma or a contusion with a significant volume of blood [22]. Following this, some of the most severe TBI patients can survive with impaired neurological function [23]. Moreover, because of the long-term effects of TBI, early follow-up and further rehabilitation are essential to facilitate recovery [24,25].
Globally, mild TBI accounts for more than 80% of the reported TBI cases [2,26,27,28]. Most studies have revealed that mild TBI is associated with a higher risk of PTH than moderate-to-severe TBI [29,30,31]. However, whether the risk of migraine development after TBI decreases with an increase in the severity of TBI remains unknown. Therefore, we hypothesized that the risk of migraine development increases after TBI and is associated with the different severity of TBI. This study assessed the risk of subsequent migraine among TBI patients and determined the modifying effects of different management levels and treatment modalities.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Sourses

This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005 (LHID2005), a subset of Taiwan’s National Health Insurance (NHI) Research Database (NHIRD). This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Cardinal Tien Hospital (CTH-110-3-5-039) and Tri-Service General Hospital (B-110-45). The requirement of written informed consent from participants was waived for this analysis of data from a deidentified database.

2.2. Study Design and Sampled Participants

Of the 1,984,250 patients with outpatient or inpatient records in the LHID2005 claims data in 2000 (Figure 1), we identified 187,906 patients diagnosed as having TBI, according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM; 2000–2015) diagnostic codes, with the diagnosis being made at least thrice in the outpatient department (OPD), once in the emergency department, or once on admission. Patients who received a TBI diagnosis in any specialty were included. Patients who were younger than 18 years or who had a history of TBI or other diseases that may cause vertigo or dizziness before the index date were excluded. Moreover, patients diagnosed as having migraine before the index date and those with incomplete demographic data were excluded. In total, 151,098 patients with newly diagnosed TBI were enrolled into the TBI cohort. For each patient in the TBI cohort, four patients without a history of TBI were selected from the remaining records by propensity score matching, according to sex, age, comorbidities, and index date (non-TBI cohort). The exclusion criteria were the same for both the cohorts. The matched non-TBI cohort included 604,394 patients, and the date of the records used for their selection served as the index date. The diagnostic codes for the inclusion and exclusion variables are presented in Appendix Table A1.

2.3. Outcome Measurement

Both the cohorts were followed up from the index date to the date of migraine onset, withdrawal from the NHI program, or the end of follow-up. For outcome measurement, migraine was defined using the ICD-9-CM diagnostic code 346 and the ICD-10-CM diagnostic code G43. Patients who received a diagnosis of migraine from a neurologist or an otolaryngologist were enrolled into this study. The cumulative incidence of migraine was estimated according to the TBI status using the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences between the cumulative incidence rates were compared using a log-rank test. Moreover, Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute the crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for migraine between the TBI and non-TBI groups and between different TBI subgroups. Injury severity scores (ISS) [32,33] were used to assess the severity of injury and to predict mortality, morbidity, and length of hospital stay. The ISS ranges from 1 to 75. As per the NHI program in Taiwan, ISS ≥ 16 denotes the presence of major trauma and a catastrophic illness. Patients with any defined catastrophic illness can benefit from copayment exemptions.

2.4. Potential Confounders

We adjusted for the following confounders: sex, age/age group, geographic location in Taiwan, urbanization level, insurance premium, season, and level of care. Individuals with or without the comorbidities listed in Table 1, on or before the index date, were stratified by the aforementioned confounders for comparison.

2.5. Subgourp Analysis

Subgroup analysis was performed according to TBI treatments to determine the effect of the interventions on migraine risk. Brain surgery, involving microvascular decompression, craniotomy or cranioplasty, ventriculostomy, hematoma removal, endarterectomy, and bypass surgery, were included as surgical treatment. Moreover, chronic rehabilitation programs included occupational therapy (OT) and physical therapy (PT).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 22 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The chi-squared test and Student’s t-test were used to assess the distributions of categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted to determine the risk of migraine. The results are presented as HRs and 95% CIs. The differences in the risk of migraine between the TBI and non-TBI cohorts were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank tests. A two-tailed p value of <0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics

The baseline characteristics of the TBI and non-TBI cohorts are presented in Table 1. The mean age of the TBI cohort was 44.43 ± 18.55 years. No significant differences in sex, age, or comorbidities were noted between the TBI and non-TBI cohorts after propensity score matching. The average follow-up period was 10.75 and 10.88 years for the TBI and non-TBI cohorts, respectively (Table 2). Appendix Table A2 presents the characteristics of the TBI and non-TBI cohorts at the end of follow-up.

3.2. Kaplan–Meier Model for Assessing the Cumulative Risk of Migraine

At the end of follow-up, 541 (0.36%) of 151,098 TBI patients and 1419 (0.23%) of 604,394 non-TBI controls had developed migraine (p < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that the cumulative risk of migraine significantly differed between the TBI and non-TBI cohorts over the 18-year follow-up period (log-rank test, p < 0.001, Figure 2).

3.3. HRs for Migraine in the TBI Cohort

AppendixTable A3 lists the factors that were associated with migraine by the end of follow-up in the Cox regression model. In the TBI cohort, the crude HR for migraine was 1.688 (95% CI: 1.454–2.006, p < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, comorbidities, insurance premium, geographic location, urbanization level, and level of care, the adjusted HR was 1.484 (95% CI: 1.276–1.724, p < 0.001). The TBI cohort exhibited a higher risk of migraine than the non-TBI cohort, as revealed by subgroup analyses stratified by sex, age group, insurance premium, comorbidities, urbanization level, geographic location, and level of care (Appendix Table A4).

3.4. HRs for Migraine Subtypes in the TBI Cohort

Table 3 presents the results of Cox regression analyses of migraine subtypes in the TBI cohort. No significant differences were noted between the risk of migraine with and without aura. Moreover, no significant differences were noted in the diagnoses made by otolaryngologists and neurologists.

3.5. HRs for TBI Subtypes

Table 4 presents the results of Cox regression analyses of TBI subtypes in the TBI cohort. Regarding the severity of injuries, the risk of migraine with ISS ≥ 16 was higher in the TBI cohort than the risk of migraine with ISS < 16 (adjusted HR: 1.670, 95% CI: 1.325–2.011, p < 0.001). Hospitalized patients exhibited a significantly higher risk of subsequent migraine than those visiting the OPD (adjusted HR: 1.557, 95% CI: 1.203–1.837, p < 0.001).

3.6. Effects of Treatment Modalities of TBI on Risk of Migraine

Table 4 presents the results of Cox regression analyses of treatment modalities in the TBI cohort. No significant differences were noted between the TBI subgroups with and without brain surgery. Similarly, no significant differences were noted between the TBI subgroups with and without OT/PT and pharmacological treatment. The percentage of participants who received OT/PT between those with and without brain surgery in the TBI cohort showed no significant difference between the two groups (Table 5). However, TBI patients who received brain surgery had a significantly longer duration and higher intensity (times) of OT/PT within one year of TBI occurrence (Table 6).

4. Discussion

In this study, the TBI cohort exhibited a higher risk of subsequent migraine than the propensity score–matched non-TBI cohort. The incidence of migraine following major trauma (ISS ≥ 16) was higher than that following minor trauma (ISS < 16) in the TBI cohort. Hospitalized TBI patients exhibited a higher risk of migraine than those who visited the OPD. Furthermore, surgery or OT/PT did not significantly reduce the risk of migraine. These results suggest that, in addition to providing acute surgical intervention and chronic rehabilitation, physicians should counsel TBI patients regarding adjuvant strategies to prevent subsequent migraine development.

4.1. Pathophysiological Links between Migraine and TBI

Whether trauma induces migraine or triggers a pre-existing susceptibility to migraine itself remains unclear. Several factors may be involved in the risk of migraine-type headache, including axonal injury, changes in cerebral autoregulation, and genetic stability [17,34,35,36]. For example, cellular injury following TBI increases the concentration of extracellular potassium, which can trigger neuronal depolarization and the release of neurotransmitters that promote the development of headaches [37]. Neuroinflammation may also play a role in brain injury [38,39], which is associated with repeated sports-associated TBI events [40,41,42], and headache is a part of its symptom spectrum [40]. Moreover, inflammation and other responses to injury can enhance neuronal excitability [43]. Hyperexcitability of trigeminal nerve branches mediates throbbing head pain in patients with migraine [10].

4.2. Effects of the Severity of TBI on the Risk of Migraine

In this population-based study of Taiwanese adults, the TBI cohort exhibited a 1.484-fold increased risk of migraine, which is in accordance with previous findings, suggesting TBI to be a risk factor for migraine [15,16,17]. Compared with TBI patients diagnosed in the OPD or emergency department, hospitalized TBI patients exhibited an increased risk of subsequent migraine. Similarly, compared with TBI patients with ISS < 16, those with ISS ≥ 16 exhibited an increased risk of subsequent migraine. These results suggest that patients with a higher severity of TBI exhibit a higher risk of migraine. However, these results contradict previous findings that mild TBI is associated with a higher risk of migraine [10,15,16,19,29,30]. These discrepant findings may be attributed to several factors. First, various criteria have been used to define the severity of TBI. These include the duration of loss of conscious [44], Glasgow Coma Scale score [5,36,45], and duration of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA). A recent study even identified more than 50 definitions for mild TBI [46]. These varying definitions may lead to differing results. Second, the inclusion criteria and sample selection processes were different in the studies. As the TBI group mainly includes patients with mild TBI, the literature largely includes samples with mild TBI and associated postconcussive disorder. Third, according to Do et al., sociodemographic differences, such as the absence of a third-party insurance program, are responsible for the discrepancies [47]. However, previous studies have not explained why migraine develops more frequently after mild TBI [15,16].
Some studies have assessed the occurrence, longitudinal course, associated factors, and characteristics of headache in more severe TBI patients. For example, one study revealed that patients who continued to experience headaches three months after TBI were more likely to exhibit slow continued recovery, particularly after a year of persistent headaches and particularly if their TBI was moderate or severe [17]. Another study revealed that patients with a history of moderate TBI had higher odds of reporting severe headaches (adjusted odds ratio: 3.89) and migraine-like features (adjusted odds ratio: 15.34) than those with subconcussive exposure, which was limited to mild TBI [44]. Furthermore, a study revealed that moderate and severe TBI can disrupt the blood–brain barrier and thus allow the migration of neutrophils from leaky blood vessels, resulting in neuroinflammation, which plays a key role in the pathophysiology of post-traumatic headache [39]. Thus, moderate or severe TBI may result in more injury and an increased risk of migraine.
We propose some possible explanations for these results. First, the follow-up times and methods for measuring tracking progress after TBI differed in the studies [48]. A recent study revealed that most patients improve within a few days to a few weeks; however, many patients continue to report PCS for months or years, even after very minor head injuries [49]. Walker et al. reported another type of headache course after severe TBI, which is known as delayed-onset headache, the symptoms of which do not manifest until after acute rehabilitation. In their study, the occurrence rate of delayed-onset headaches over the one-year period after discharge was 22% [50]. Second, measuring the progress and outcomes following neuropsychological rehabilitation for mild TBI is challenging because of the variability of baseline symptoms, the subjectivity of many common problems, and the lack of a reliable relationship between objective measures (such as neuropsychological tests and neuroimaging) and the subjective sense of progress or success [51]. Thus, studies with shorter follow-up times or difficulty in tracking may have underestimated the number of patients who developed migraine after moderate or severe TBI. Third, studies on the association between the severity of TBI and pain have reported mixed findings. In these studies, information was collected based on patient reports [30,44]. Hence, multiple factors, such as sampling bias [50], assessment methods, study types, and cultural and language backgrounds [52], can explain the discrepancies observed in the prevalence of post-traumatic headache in different studies. Patients with mild TBI have been reported to be more susceptible to perceiving pain and have a lower pain threshold [38]. Moreover, patients with more severe TBI may have difficulty in reporting or processing their symptoms because of memory disturbance, language deficit, and executive dysfunction. Thus, more reports of migraine may be observed after mild TBI than after moderate or severe TBI. A prospective controlled study assessing the risk of migraine in TBI patients is, therefore, warranted to confirm this association.

4.3. Effects of Treatment Modalities for TBI on the Risk of Migraine

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the association between treatment modalities for TBI and the risk of migraine by using data from a nationwide population-based database. No significant difference was noted in the risk of migraine between patients undergoing brain surgery and those receiving OT/PT. However, evidence of the association between treatment modalities and the risk of migraine is still lacking. Further studies are warranted to assess the association between treatment modalities for TBI and the risk of migraine.
Many factors can affect recovery from TBI; these include injury characteristics, neuropathological findings, premorbid personality traits, and psychological characteristics [53]. Moreover, several studies have revealed that migraine-like headaches are linked to slow recovery [54,55,56]. Rehabilitation after brain injury can promote recovery through three main approaches: spontaneous improvement that can prevent complications in days to months, increase in neuroplasticity that can result in functional restitution, and compensative maximization of independence and quality of life [20].
Most approaches for treating post-traumatic headache with migraine-like features are derived from those effective in treating migraine headaches [49,57]. Nonpharmacological approaches involve lifestyle modifications, such as exercise, good sleep, hydration, and management of stress or events that can trigger migraine attacks. Managing anxiety may reduce ongoing symptoms [58]. Moreover, managing socioeconomic and family-related stressors plays a crucial role in managing the effects of persistent PCS [49,59]. Furthermore, pharmacological treatment [60], such as acute or preventive medications for primary headache disorders, is useful [19,25,61].

4.4. Strengths and Limitations of This Study

Our study has several important strengths. First, this longitudinal study involved a large cohort, providing sufficient power to detect associations and to adjust for a wide range of potential confounders. Second, the baseline characteristics, such as comorbidities, did not differ significantly, thereby decreasing the heterogeneity usually noted in a civilian study population. Third, the follow-up period in our study was quite long (>10 years). This may decrease the possibility of the under-identification of patients who developed migraine in a later period after TBI. Fourth, we not only demonstrated the prevalence of migraine among TBI patients, but we also described the relationship of migraine with the severity of brain injury and treatment modalities. Finally, to increase the validity of our findings, we only included patients who received a diagnosis of migraine from an otolaryngologist or a neurologist.
Our study also has several limitations. First, TBI and migraine were diagnosed based on ICD codes instead of using validated structural diagnostic instruments or the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition codes. Moreover, detailed medical records, including OT/PT’s treatment intensity, were unavailable in the deidentified claims data. However, to improve the accuracy of our definition of migraine, we only used diagnoses made by otolaryngologists and neurologists. Additionally, we could not identify the severity of TBI based on ICD-9-CM codes. Hence, we used data on ISSs and management levels (e.g., treatment on OPD visits, emergent department visits, or hospitalization) to distinguish the severity of TBI. However, this may not accurately reflect the severity of TBI. Second, data on residual confounders, including genetic, physical, psychological, behavioral, and other socioenvironmental parameters related to different types of migraine, were not available in the NHIRD. However, adjusting for age and sex in the analysis may partially control for this factor. Furthermore, the baseline characteristics did not differ significantly in our study, which may reduce the heterogeneity. Third, despite being derived from a population-based study, our results may not be generalizable to other countries with populations with different ethnicities and backgrounds. Fourth, several studies have revealed that patients with a family history of headache are more likely to exhibit a migraine phenotype than those without this family history [51]. However, we could not assess the effect of family history in the claims database. Finally, because of the retrospective study design, we could not determine the causal relationship between TBI and migraine. Additional prospective trials are warranted to clarify the causal relationship between TBI and migraine and to determine the effects of treatment on the risk of migraine in TBI patients.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrated that TBI was associated with a 1.484-fold increased risk of migraine. Moreover, among TBI patients, hospitalization and major trauma (ISS ≥ 16) were associated with 1.557-fold and 1.670-fold increased risks of migraine, respectively. No significant differences were noted between the treatment modalities after TBI. These findings highlight the importance of long-term follow-up after TBI and the need to further assess the underlying pathophysiological link between TBI and subsequent migraine.

Author Contributions

Study concept and design, W.-C.C., Y.-F.S. and J.-W.C.; Acquisition, W.-C.C., C.-H.C. and J.-W.C.; Analysis: W.-C.C., C.-H.C. and J.-W.C.; Statistical analysis: C.-H.C.; Interpretation of data: M.-H.C., W.-C.C., Y.-F.S., C.-H.C. and J.-W.C.; Drafting of the manuscript: M.-H.C. and J.-W.C.; Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: M.-H.C., Y.-F.S., W.-C.C., C.-H.C. and J.-W.C.; Obtained funding, administrative, technical, material support, and study supervision: W.-C.C. and J.-W.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Science and Technology Council of the Republic of China (Taiwan), under grants NSTC 109-2511-H-567-001-MY2 and NSTC 110-2511-H-567-001-MY2 and, in part, it was funded by Cardinal Tien Hospital, under grant CTH111A-2203. This study was also supported by the Tri-Service General Hospital Research Foundation (TSGH-B-111018). We also appreciate the Health and Welfare Data Science Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare (HWDC, MOHW), Taiwan, for providing the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Cardinal Tien Hospital (CTH-110-3-5-039) and Tri-Service General Hospital (B-110-45).

Informed Consent Statement

The requirement of written informed consent from participants was waived for this analysis of data from a deidentified database.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in the study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for administrative assistance on this project provided by Chiu-Ping Wang, Shu-Hwei Fan, Uan-Shr Jan, and Wan-Ning Luo. They received no additional compensation for their contributions. We also appreciate the Health and Welfare Data Science Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, for providing the National Health Insurance Research Database. This manuscript was edited by Wallace Academic Editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Appendix A

Table A1. Diagnostic codes (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes) for the inclusion and exclusion variables and NHI and ATC codes for medications.
Table A1. Diagnostic codes (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes) for the inclusion and exclusion variables and NHI and ATC codes for medications.
VariablesAbbreviationICD-9-CM/ICD-10/NHI Code/ATC Code/Definition
Study population:
Traumatic brain injury
TBI310.2, 800–804, 850–854, 870–873, 905.0, 907.0, 950.1, 950.3, 950.91, V15.52; S01, S02, S06, T90
Minor casesOPD≧3 outpatient department visits
Emergent casesEREmergency room visits
Severe casesADMAdmission visits
Brain surgery Any of the following
Microvascular decompression OP04.41, 83001B, 83030B, 83087B
Craniotomy/Cranioplasty OP01.21–OP01.28, OP02.01–OP02.07, OP02.12, 64002B, 64005B, 65067B, 65068B, 83004B, 83005B, 83011B, 83012B, 83013C, 83015C, 83016B, 83036C, 88037B, 83039B, 83047B, 83077B, 83078B
Ventriculostomy with or without shunting OP02.2–OP02.4, 83013C, 83051B, 83049B, 83050B, 83052C, 83055B
Removal of subdural/epidural/brain hematoma OP01.01–OP02.12, 29001C, 29024B, 64143B, 64204B–64206B, 65060B, 83010B, 83013C, 83016B–83019B, 88037B, 83037C, 83038C, 83039B, 83047B, 83056B, 83080B–83082B, 83088B, 84034B
Endarterectomy OP38.12, 69004B
Bypass surgeries OP39.28, 69008B, 83063B
Occupational therapyOTOP93.83
Simple OT 43001A, 43002B, 43003C
Moderate OT 43004A, 43005B, 43006C, 43007A, 43008B, 43009C, 43027C, 43028C
Complicated OT 43029A, 43030B, 43031, 43032C
Physical therapyPTOP91.1–OP93.6
Simple PT 42001A, 42002B, 42003C, 42004A, 42005B, 42006C
Moderate PT 42007A, 42008B, 42009C, 42010A, 42011B, 42012C, 42017C, 42018C
Complicated PT 42013A, 42014B, 42015C, 42019C
Pharmacological treatment
Antiepileptics N03A
Osmotic diuresis B05BC
Minor trauma Injury severity score (ISS) < 16
Major trauma ISS ≥ 16
Excluding:
Epidemic vertigo 078.81; A88.1
Benign neoplasm of cranial nerves 225.1; D33.3
Vertiginous syndromes and other disorders of vestibular system 386; H81.1–H81.3
Sudden hearing loss 388.2; H91.2
Dizziness and giddiness 780.4; R42
Events: Migraine 346; G43; Diagnosis by otolaryngologist or neurologist and medical visits ≧3
Migraine with aura 346.0; G43.1
Migraine without aura 346.1; G43.0
Comorbidities:
HypertensionHTN401–405; I10–I15
Diabetes mellitusDM250; E10–E14
Depression 296.2, 296.3, 296.82, 300.4, 311; F32, F33, F34.1
Congestive heart failureCHF428; I50
Cerebrovascular accidentCVA430–438; I60–I69
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseCOPD490–496; J40–J47
Liver disease 571; K70-K77excluding K70.9
Alcoholism 291, 303, 571.3; F10, K70.9
Chronic kidney diseaseCKD585-586; N18–N19
Gout 274; M10
Osteoporosis 733.0; M81
Hyperlipidemia 272.0–272.4; E78.4, E78.5, E78.8, E78.9
Autoimmune diseaseAID710; M32–M35
Table A2. Characteristics of the TBI and non-TBI cohorts at the end of follow-up.
Table A2. Characteristics of the TBI and non-TBI cohorts at the end of follow-up.
TBITotalWithWithoutp Value
Variablesn%n%n%
Total755,490 151,09820.00604,39280.00
Migraine <0.001
Without753,53099.74150,55799.64602,97399.77
With19600.265410.3614190.23
Sex 0.999
Male469,60562.1693,92162.16375,68462.16
Female285,88537.8457,17737.84228,70837.84
Age (years)51.26 ± 19.9151.06 ± 19.8051.31 ± 19.94<0.001
Age group (yrs) <0.001
18–29144,33319.1028,82219.08115,51119.11
30–39148,15219.6128,72919.01119,42319.76
40–49122,25916.1824,60316.2897,65616.16
50–5999,88813.2220,59213.6379,29613.12
≧60240,85831.8848,35232.00192,50631.85
Insured premium (NT$) <0.001
<15,840739,70797.91147,91997.90591,78897.91
15,841–25,00011,3111.5024711.6488401.46
>25,00144720.597080.4737640.62
Hypertension <0.001
Without660,42287.42134,10088.75526,32287.08
With95,06812.5816,99811.2578,07012.92
Diabetes mellitus <0.001
Without672,27888.99136,37390.25535,90588.67
With83,21211.0114,7259.7568,48711.33
Depression 0.526
Without749,33499.19149,84799.17599,48799.19
With61560.8112510.8349050.81
Congestive Heart Failure <0.001
Without732,95197.02147,57397.67585,37896.85
With22,5392.9835252.3319,0143.15
Cerebrovascular accident 0.004
Without715,20894.67142,81594.52572,39394.71
With40,2825.3382835.4831,9995.29
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease <0.001
Without717,78295.01144,49195.63573,29194.85
With37,7084.9966074.3731,1015.15
Liver cirrhosis <0.001
Without717,49294.97144,20495.44573,28894.85
With37,9985.0368944.5631,1045.15
Alcoholism <0.001
Without749,85999.25149,36298.85600,49799.36
With56310.7517361.1538950.64
Chronic Kidney Disease <0.001
Without716,14094.79145,27696.15570,86494.45
With39,3505.2158223.8533,5285.55
Osteoporosis 0.428
Without753,30999.71150,64799.70602,66299.71
With21810.294510.3017300.29
Hyperlipidemia <0.001
Without739,64597.90148,43998.24591,20697.82
With15,8452.1026591.7613,1862.18
Autoimmune Disease <0.001
Without753,28199.71150,87499.85602,40799.67
With22090.292240.1519850.33
Season <0.001
Spring185,32624.5335,90823.76149,41824.72
Summer193,58125.6238,19525.28155,38625.71
Autumn197,23426.1140,40726.74156,82725.95
Winter179,34923.7436,58824.21142,76123.62
Location <0.001
Northern Taiwan296,79539.2943,13528.55253,66041.97
Central Taiwan220,24429.1550,43633.38169,80828.10
Southern Taiwan193,65725.6348,06231.81145,59524.09
Eastern Taiwan41,6055.5188885.8832,7175.41
Outlying islands31890.425770.3826120.43
Urbanization level <0.001
1 (The highest)242,75132.1338,21025.29204,54133.84
2325,34843.0662,27441.21263,07443.53
366,9138.8616,93511.2149,9788.27
4 (The lowest)120,47815.9533,67922.2986,79914.36
Table A3. Factors associated with migraine by the end of follow-up in the Cox regression model.
Table A3. Factors associated with migraine by the end of follow-up in the Cox regression model.
VariablesCrude HR95% CI (Low)95% CI
(High)
p ValueAdjusted HR95% CI
(Low)
95% CI
(High)
p Value
TBI
WithoutReference Reference
With1.6881.4542.006< 0.0011.4841.2761.724<0.001
Sex
Male0.4070.3560.466<0.0010.3930.3420.452<0.001
FemaleReference Reference
Age group (yrs)
18–29Reference Reference
30–390.5320.4120.689<0.0010.5420.4190.702<0.001
40–490.5960.4600.773<0.0010.6920.5310.900<0.001
50–590.5970.4620.770<0.0010.6150.4720.803<0.001
≧600.2530.1960.326<0.0010.2420.1840.319<0.001
Insured premium * (NT$)
<15,840Reference Reference
15,841–25,0001.1310.6901.8540.7261.0430.6361.7110.745
>25,0010.2350.0341.6730.2680.2320.0331.6520.291
Hypertension
WithoutReference Reference
With0.8760.7411.0330.0841.0760.8921.2990.109
Diabetes mellitus
WithoutReference Reference
With1.7271.6031.882<0.0011.2470.9841.5470.063
Depression
WithoutReference Reference
With6.3974.9778.220<0.0015.4975.2816.069<0.001
Congestive Heart Failure
WithoutReference Reference
With0.2770.1480.516<0.0010.4340.2320.814<0.001
Cerebrovascular
accident
WithoutReference Reference
With2.0211.6542.469<0.0012.9022.3363.605<0.001
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
WithoutReference Reference
With1.0660.8191.3880.1841.6021.2192.1040.001
Liver cirrhosis
WithoutReference Reference
With0.8010.5801.1100.4861.0590.7591.4770.577
Alcoholism
WithoutReference Reference
With0.9580.4781.9220.5971.0860.3821.5960.634
Chronic Kidney Disease
WithoutReference Reference
With1.2641.1591.443<0.0011.4081.2421.695<0.001
Osteoporosis
WithoutReference Reference
With0.5070.1272.0310.8110.6070.1522.4410.862
Hyperlipidemia
WithoutReference Reference
With1.6821.2772.216<0.0011.7421.3072.322<0.001
Autoimmune Disease
WithoutReference Reference
With2.2141.1484.269<0.0011.8450.9653.6340.073
Season **
SpringReference Reference
Summer0.8590.7151.0330.1860.8560.7121.0290.194
Autumn0.7190.5970.866<0.0010.7130.5920.859<0.001
Winter0.9150.7611.1010.2930.9290.7721.1180.345
Location Multicollinearity with urbanization level
Northern TaiwanReference
Central Taiwan1.5631.3301.837<0.001
Southern Taiwan1.1610.9711.3900.079
Eastern Taiwan1.5361.1811.997<0.001
Outlying islands3.2541.6756.322<0.001
Urbanization level ***
1 (The highest)0.5540.4540.676<0.0010.6650.5330.829<0.001
20.8510.7201.0070.0560.9880.8281.1790.188
30.8530.6631.0970.2340.7760.6020.9990.049
4 (The lowest)Reference Reference
Level of care
Hospital center0.4540.3800.541<0.0010.5770.4720.705<0.001
Regional hospital0.5700.4900.662<0.0010.6260.5370.731<0.001
District hospitalReference Reference
HR = hazard ratio, CI = confidence interval, Adjusted HR: Adjusted variables listed in the table. * Insured premium levels were used to reflect the insured individual’s socioeconomic status. ** Refer to the season when the injury occurred in both cohorts or the last visit date when the participants did not experience any injury event. *** The urbanization level was defined by population and certain indicators of the city’s level of development.
Table A4. Factors associated with the occurrence of migraine stratified by the variables listed in Table 1 using Cox regression analysis.
Table A4. Factors associated with the occurrence of migraine stratified by the variables listed in Table 1 using Cox regression analysis.
TBIWithWithout (Reference)With vs. Without
(Reference)
StratifiedEventsPYsRate (Per 105 PYs)EventsPYsRate (Per 105 PYs)Adjusted HR95% CI
(Low)
95% CI
(High)
p Value
Total5411,010,916.2553.5214194,027,839.9735.231.4841.2761.724<0.001
Sex
Male199597,601.8333.305542,457,518.3622.541.4451.2441.678<0.001
Female342413,314.4282.758651,570,321.6155.081.5221.3241.811<0.001
Age group (yrs)
18–299164,215.20141.71152201,963.3375.261.8331.5782.133<0.001
30–3997197,296.9449.16290874,603.7433.161.2361.0681.436<0.001
40–49117157,731.0474.18283634,482.3544.601.6651.4321.934<0.001
50–59125175,126.1171.38321693,473.1146.291.5161.3041.760<0.001
≧60111416,546.9626.653731,623,317.4422.981.2041.0351.3980.013
Insured premium (NT$)
<15,840530989,004.2553.5913933,944,623.3935.311.4831.2741.723<0.001
15,841–25,0001117,911.5361.412562,678.5439.891.5591.3411.811<0.001
>25,00104000.470.00120,538.044.870.000--0.994
Hypertension
Without448825,842.9254.2511333,143,631.2236.041.4711.2621.709<0.001
With93185,073.3350.25286884,208.7532.351.5131.3021.764<0.001
Diabetes mellitus
Without467863,203.9554.1012303,339,985.7136.831.4391.2351.673<0.001
With74147,712.3050.10189687,854.2627.481.7521.5072.037<0.001
Depression
Without482997,210.8648.3313083,979,648.0532.871.4301.2251.670<0.001
With5913,705.39430.4911148,191.92230.331.7971.5432.074<0.001
Congestive Heart Failure
Without537978,539.1954.8814013,859,770.2236.301.5111.2781.731<0.001
With432,377.0612.3518168,069.7510.711.2581.0791.455<0.001
Cerebrovascular accident
Without462941,570.6949.0712313,766,339.2632.681.4561.2521.694<0.001
With7969,345.56113.92188261,500.7171.891.6061.4121.868<0.001
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Without505951,627.5253.0713243,770,829.5535.111.4481.2321.700<0.001
With3659,288.7360.7295257,010.4236.961.5861.3611.837<0.001
Liver cirrhosis
Without515951,563.2354.1213613,815,760.6435.671.4751.2411.655<0.001
With2659,353.0243.8158212,079.3327.351.6241.4081.927<0.001
Alcoholism
Without530995,286.0153.2514123,996,191.1535.331.4691.2511.646<0.001
With1115,630.2470.38731,648.8222.123.3102.8473.863<0.001
Chronic Kidney Disease
Without519964,562.9953.8113943,780,041.7536.881.4071.2191.614<0.001
With2246,353.2647.4625247,798.2210.094.3683.7605.067<0.001
Osteoporosis
Without5411,006,506.9753.7514164,010,101.4735.311.4871.2791.731<0.001
With04409.280.00317,738.5016.910.000--0.972
Hyperlipidemia
Without509980,866.5751.8913303,876,852.7134.311.4801.2711.700<0.001
With3230,049.68106.4989150,987.2658.951.7271.4842.012<0.001
Autoimmune Disease
Without5381,008,504.5853.3514034,007,721.7335.011.4561.2471.701<0.001
With32411.67124.401620,118.2479.532.3352.0122.723<0.001
Season
Spring172229,526.2574.94380935,681.2840.611.8021.5512.093<0.001
Summer117255,445.3345.803251,023,297.8731.761.4151.2181.646<0.001
Autumn113290,161.7438.943511,138,255.2430.841.2251.0551.426<0.001
Winter139235,782.9358.95363930,605.5839.011.4781.2721.717<0.001
Urbanization level
1 (The highest)74243,266.9830.422991,239,987.5824.111.2121.0421.4090.007
2215423,537.3750.766251,784,778.6035.021.4101.2111.639<0.001
356107,878.3651.91128344,857.1237.121.3511.1621.575<0.001
4 (The lowest)196236,233.5482.97367658,216.6755.761.4801.2701.727<0.001
Level of care
Hospital center89246,378.8036.123741,365,977.2827.381.2871.1051.496<0.001
Regional hospital213481,275.2644.266001,816,767.2033.031.3131.1301.529<0.001
District hospital239283,262.1984.37445845,095.4952.661.5621.3441.814<0.001

References

  1. Timofeev, I.; Santarius, T.; Kolias, A.G.; Hutchinson, P.J. Decompressive craniectomy-operative technique and perioperative care. Adv. Tech. Stand. Neurosurg. 2012, 38, 115–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dewan, M.C.; Rattani, A.; Gupta, S.; Baticulon, R.E.; Hung, Y.C.; Punchak, M.; Agrawal, A.; Adeleye, A.O.; Shrime, M.G.; Rubiano, A.M.; et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosurg. 2018, 130, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Maas, A.I.R.; Menon, D.K.; Adelson, P.D.; Andelic, N.; Bell, M.J.; Belli, A.; Bragge, P.; Brazinova, A.; Buki, A.; Chesnut, R.M.; et al. Traumatic brain injury: Integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2017, 16, 987–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Faul, M.; Coronado, V. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2015, 127, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tagliaferri, F.; Compagnone, C.; Korsic, M.; Servadei, F.; Kraus, J. A systematic review of brain injury epidemiology in Europe. Acta Neurochir. 2006, 148, 255–268; discussion 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lele, A.V. Traumatic Brain Injury in Different Age Groups. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stocchetti, N.; Zanier, E.R. Chronic impact of traumatic brain injury on outcome and quality of life: A narrative review. Crit. Care 2016, 20, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Garcia, K.; Moore, B.; Kim, G.; Dsurney, J.; Chan, L. The Impact of Affective States on Postconcussive Symptoms in a TBI Population. Mil. Med. 2019, 184, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Gardner, R.C.; Byers, A.L.; Barnes, D.E.; Li, Y.; Boscardin, J.; Yaffe, K. Mild TBI and risk of Parkinson disease: A Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium Study. Neurology 2018, 90, e1771–e1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Theeler, B.; Lucas, S.; Riechers, R.G., 2nd; Ruff, R.L. Post-traumatic headaches in civilians and military personnel: A comparative, clinical review. Headache 2013, 53, 881–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Rauen, K.; Reichelt, L.; Probst, P.; Schapers, B.; Muller, F.; Jahn, K.; Plesnila, N. Quality of life up to 10 years after traumatic brain injury: A cross-sectional analysis. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2020, 18, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mollayeva, T.; Mollayeva, S.; Colantonio, A. The Risk of Sleep Disorder Among Persons with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2016, 16, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Howard, L.; Dumkrieger, G.; Chong, C.D.; Ross, K.; Berisha, V.; Schwedt, T.J. Symptoms of Autonomic Dysfunction Among Those With Persistent Posttraumatic Headache Attributed to Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Comparison to Migraine and Healthy Controls. Headache 2018, 58, 1397–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rauen, K.; Spani, C.B.; Tartaglia, M.C.; Ferretti, M.T.; Reichelt, L.; Probst, P.; Schapers, B.; Muller, F.; Jahn, K.; Plesnila, N. Quality of life after traumatic brain injury: A cross-sectional analysis uncovers age- and sex-related differences over the adult life span. Geroscience 2021, 43, 263–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ishii, R.; Schwedt, T.J.; Trivedi, M.; Dumkrieger, G.; Cortez, M.M.; Brennan, K.C.; Digre, K.; Dodick, D.W. Mild traumatic brain injury affects the features of migraine. J. Headache Pain 2021, 22, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nampiaparampil, D.E. Prevalence of chronic pain after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. JAMA 2008, 300, 711–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dwyer, B. Posttraumatic Headache. Semin. Neurol. 2018, 38, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ashina, M. Migraine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 1866–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Capi, M.; Pomes, L.M.; Andolina, G.; Curto, M.; Martelletti, P.; Lionetto, L. Persistent Post-Traumatic Headache and Migraine: Pre-Clinical Comparisons. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Marklund, N.; Bellander, B.M.; Godbolt, A.K.; Levin, H.; McCrory, P.; Thelin, E.P. Treatments and rehabilitation in the acute and chronic state of traumatic brain injury. J. Intern. Med. 2019, 285, 608–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Pinggera, D.; Rhomberg, P.; Beer, R.; Thome, C.; Petr, O. Brain Tissue Damage Induced by Multimodal Neuromonitoring In Situ during MRI after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Incidence and Clinical Relevance. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bullock, M.R.; Chesnut, R.; Ghajar, J.; Gordon, D.; Hartl, R.; Newell, D.W.; Servadei, F.; Walters, B.C.; Wilberger, J.E.; Surgical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury Author Group. Surgical management of acute subdural hematomas. Neurosurgery 2006, 58, S16–S24; discussion Si–Siv. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tapper, J.; Skrifvars, M.B.; Kivisaari, R.; Siironen, J.; Raj, R. Primary decompressive craniectomy is associated with worse neurological outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury requiring acute surgery. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2017, 8, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Dang, B.; Chen, W.; He, W.; Chen, G. Rehabilitation Treatment and Progress of Traumatic Brain Injury Dysfunction. Neural Plast. 2017, 2017, 1582182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Yang, S.; Orlova, Y.; Lipe, A.; Boren, M.; Hincapie-Castillo, J.M.; Park, H.; Chang, C.Y.; Wilson, D.L.; Adkins, L.; Lo-Ciganic, W.H. Trends in the Management of Headache Disorders in US Emergency Departments: Analysis of 2007-2018 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Data. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Capizzi, A.; Woo, J.; Verduzco-Gutierrez, M. Traumatic Brain Injury: An Overview of Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Medical Management. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2020, 104, 213–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Iaccarino, C.; Carretta, A.; Nicolosi, F.; Morselli, C. Epidemiology of severe traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosurg. Sci. 2018, 62, 535–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lam, C.; Yen, J.C.; Wu, C.C.; Lin, H.Y.; Hsu, M.H. Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Treatment Efficiency for Traumatic Brain Injury in the Emergency Department: A Multicenter Study in Taiwan. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lucas, S. Posttraumatic Headache: Clinical Characterization and Management. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2015, 19, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ashina, H.; Iljazi, A.; Amin, F.M.; Ashina, M.; Lipton, R.B.; Schytz, H.W. Interrelations between migraine-like headache and persistent post-traumatic headache attributed to mild traumatic brain injury: A prospective diary study. J. Headache Pain 2020, 21, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Anderson, K.; Tinawi, S.; Lamoureux, J.; Feyz, M.; de Guise, E. Detecting Migraine in Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Using Three Different Headache Measures. Behav. Neurol. 2015, 2015, 693925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Committee on Medical Aspects of Automotive Safety. Rating the severity of tissue damage. I. The abbreviated scale. JAMA 1971, 215, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Baker, S.P.; O’Neill, B.; Haddon, W., Jr.; Long, W.B. The injury severity score: A method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J. Trauma 1974, 14, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bree, D.; Levy, D. Development of CGRP-dependent pain and headache related behaviours in a rat model of concussion: Implications for mechanisms of post-traumatic headache. Cephalalgia 2018, 38, 246–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Galgano, M.; Toshkezi, G.; Qiu, X.; Russell, T.; Chin, L.; Zhao, L.R. Traumatic Brain Injury: Current Treatment Strategies and Future Endeavors. Cell Transpl. 2017, 26, 1118–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Pavlovic, D.; Pekic, S.; Stojanovic, M.; Popovic, V. Traumatic brain injury: Neuropathological, neurocognitive and neurobehavioral sequelae. Pituitary 2019, 22, 270–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Packard, R.C.; Ham, L.P. Pathogenesis of posttraumatic headache and migraine: A common headache pathway? Headache 1997, 37, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mofatteh, M. Examining the association between traumatic brain injury and headache. J. Integr. Neurosci. 2021, 20, 1079–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ruff, R.L.; Blake, K. Pathophysiological links between traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic headaches. F1000Research 2016, 5, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. McKee, A.C.; Cantu, R.C.; Nowinski, C.J.; Hedley-Whyte, E.T.; Gavett, B.E.; Budson, A.E.; Santini, V.E.; Lee, H.S.; Kubilus, C.A.; Stern, R.A. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in athletes: Progressive tauopathy after repetitive head injury. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2009, 68, 709–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ling, H.; Hardy, J.; Zetterberg, H. Neurological consequences of traumatic brain injuries in sports. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 66, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. McKee, A.C.; Daneshvar, D.H.; Alvarez, V.E.; Stein, T.D. The neuropathology of sport. Acta Neuropathol. 2014, 127, 29–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hains, B.C.; Waxman, S.G. Activated microglia contribute to the maintenance of chronic pain after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 4308–4317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Coffman, C.; Reyes, D.; Hess, M.C.; Giakas, A.M.; Thiam, M.; Sico, J.J.; Seng, E.; Renthal, W.; Rhoades, C.; Cai, G.; et al. Relationship Between Headache Characteristics and a Remote History of TBI in Veterans: A 10-Year Retrospective Chart Review. Neurology 2022, 99, e187–e198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Khellaf, A.; Khan, D.Z.; Helmy, A. Recent advances in traumatic brain injury. J. Neurol. 2019, 266, 2878–2889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Kristman, V.L.; Borg, J.; Godbolt, A.K.; Salmi, L.R.; Cancelliere, C.; Carroll, L.J.; Holm, L.W.; Nygren-de Boussard, C.; Hartvigsen, J.; Abara, U.; et al. Methodological issues and research recommendations for prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury: Results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2014, 95, S265–S277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Do, T.P.; Remmers, A.; Schytz, H.W.; Schankin, C.; Nelson, S.E.; Obermann, M.; Hansen, J.M.; Sinclair, A.J.; Gantenbein, A.R.; Schoonman, G.G. Red and orange flags for secondary headaches in clinical practice: SNNOOP10 list. Neurology 2019, 92, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. De Oliveira, D.V.; Vieira, R.C.A.; Pipek, L.Z.; de Sousa, R.M.C.; de Souza, C.P.E.; Santana-Santos, E.; Paiva, W.S. Long-Term Outcomes in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury and Associated Factors: A Prospective Cohort Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fife, T.D.; Kalra, D. Persistent vertigo and dizziness after mild traumatic brain injury. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2015, 1343, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Walker, W.C.; Seel, R.T.; Curtiss, G.; Warden, D.L. Headache after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal analysis. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2005, 86, 1793–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Prince, C.; Bruhns, M.E. Evaluation and Treatment of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: The Role of Neuropsychology. Brain Sci 2017, 7, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Wang, Y.; Chan, R.C.; Deng, Y. Examination of postconcussion-like symptoms in healthy university students: Relationships to subjective and objective neuropsychological function performance. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2006, 21, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Rabinowitz, A.R.; Arnett, P.A. Positive psychology perspective on traumatic brain injury recovery and rehabilitation. Appl. Neuropsychol. Adult 2018, 25, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Collins, M.W.; Field, M.; Lovell, M.R.; Iverson, G.; Johnston, K.M.; Maroon, J.; Fu, F.H. Relationship between postconcussion headache and neuropsychological test performance in high school athletes. Am. J. Sport. Med. 2003, 31, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Mihalik, J.P.; Stump, J.E.; Collins, M.W.; Lovell, M.R.; Field, M.; Maroon, J.C. Posttraumatic migraine characteristics in athletes following sports-related concussion. J. Neurosurg. 2005, 102, 850–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Asplund, C.A.; McKeag, D.B.; Olsen, C.H. Sport-related concussion: Factors associated with prolonged return to play. Clin. J. Sport Med. 2004, 14, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Albanese, M. Clinical Management of Migraine. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 5225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Valente, M.; Garbo, R.; Filippi, F.; Antonutti, A.; Ceccarini, V.; Tereshko, Y.; Di Lorenzo, C.; Gigli, G.L. Migraine Prevention through Ketogenic Diet: More than Body Mass Composition Changes. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 4946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Heslot, C.; Azouvi, P.; Perdrieau, V.; Granger, A.; Lefevre-Dognin, C.; Cogne, M. A Systematic Review of Treatments of Post-Concussion Symptoms. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lo Castro, F.; Baraldi, C.; Pellesi, L.; Guerzoni, S. Clinical Evidence of Cannabinoids in Migraine: A Narrative Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nissan, G.R.; Kim, R.; Cohen, J.M.; Seminerio, M.J.; Krasenbaum, L.J.; Carr, K.; Martin, V. Reducing the Burden of Migraine: Safety and Efficacy of CGRP Pathway-Targeted Preventive Treatments. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 4359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flow diagram of study sample selection.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of study sample selection.
Jcm 12 01530 g001
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier analysis of cumulative risk of migraine stratified by TBI using the log-rank test.
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier analysis of cumulative risk of migraine stratified by TBI using the log-rank test.
Jcm 12 01530 g002
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population at baseline.
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population at baseline.
TBITotalWithWithoutp Value
Variablesn%n%n%
Total755,490 151,09820.00604,39280.00
Sex 0.999
Male469,60562.1693,92162.16375,68462.16
Female285,88537.8457,17737.84228,70837.84
Age (years)44.45 ± 18.7644.43 ± 18.5544.46 ± 18.810.578
Age group (yrs) 0.999
18–29221,87529.3744,37529.37177,50029.37
30–39129,80517.1825,96117.18103,84417.18
40–49132,02017.4726,40417.47105,61617.47
50–5989,19511.8117,83911.8171,35611.81
≧60182,59524.1736,51924.17146,07624.17
Insured premium (NT$) <0.001
<15,840739,70797.91147,91997.90591,78897.91
15,841–25,00011,3111.5024711.6488401.46
>25,00144720.597080.4737640.62
Hypertension 0.656
Without707,96893.71141,55693.68566,41293.72
With47,5226.2995426.3237,9806.28
Diabetes mellitus 0.693
Without717,89695.02143,60995.04574,28795.02
With37,5944.9874894.9630,1054.98
Depression 0.164
Without754,06599.81150,79299.80603,27399.81
With14250.193060.2011190.19
Congestive Heart Failure 0.511
Without753,03299.67150,62099.68602,41299.67
With24580.334780.3219800.33
Cerebrovascular accident 0.708
Without739,10597.83147,80297.82591,30397.83
With16,3852.1732962.1813,0892.17
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 0.547
Without745,87698.73149,19998.74596,67798.72
With96141.2718991.2677151.28
Liver cirrhosis 0.538
Without740,38898.32148,11998.34592,26998.32
With12,6441.6825011.6610,1431.68
Alcoholism 0.751
Without749,24299.17149,85999.18599,38399.17
With62480.8312390.8250090.83
Chronic Kidney Disease 0.903
Without748,70899.10149,74699.11598,96299.10
With67820.9013520.8954300.90
Osteoporosis 0.617
Without754,08399.81150,80999.81603,27499.82
With14070.192890.1911180.18
Hyperlipidemia 0.697
Without751,34199.45150,25899.44601,08399.45
With41490.558400.5633090.55
Autoimmune Disease 0.527
Without755,29899.97151,05699.97604,24299.98
With1920.03420.031500.02
Season 0.999
Spring (Mar–May)189,78525.1237,95725.12151,82825.12
Summer (Jun–Aug)188,91025.0037,78225.00151,12825.00
Autumn (Sep–Nov)190,67025.2438,13425.24152,53625.24
Winter (Dec–Feb)186,12524.6437,22524.64148,90024.64
Location <0.001
Northern Taiwan295,63139.1340,02526.49255,60642.29
Central Taiwan221,80729.3652,86434.99168,94327.95
Southern Taiwan193,68025.6448,29931.97145,38124.05
Eastern Taiwan41,1695.4592876.1531,8825.28
Outlying islands32030.426230.4125800.43
Urbanization level <0.001
1 (The highest)247,54732.7732,82421.72214,72335.53
2316,11341.8459,27339.23256,84042.50
370,1529.2920,00613.2450,1468.30
4 (The lowest)121,67816.1138,99525.8182,68313.68
Level of care <0.001
Hospital center229,15530.3322,64814.99206,50734.17
Regional hospital251,36733.2747,43831.40203,92933.74
District hospital274,96836.4081,01253.62193,95632.09
Table 2. Comparison of years of follow-up and years to migraine onset in the TBI and non-TBI cohorts.
Table 2. Comparison of years of follow-up and years to migraine onset in the TBI and non-TBI cohorts.
Years of Follow-UpYears to Migraine
TBIMinMedianMaxMean ± SDMinMedianMaxMean ± SD
With0.018.6317.8610.75 ± 8.420.026.1817.497.02 ± 4.86
Without0.018.8617.9310.88 ± 8.650.036.7517.627.41 ± 5.03
Overall0.018.7917.9310.85 ± 8.600.026.6417.627.33 ± 5.00
Table 3. Assessment of factors associated with migraine subgroups using Cox regression analysis.
Table 3. Assessment of factors associated with migraine subgroups using Cox regression analysis.
TBIWith vs. Without (Reference)
Migraine SubgroupAdjusted HR95% CI95% CIp Value
Overall1.4841.276 1.724 <0.001
Migraine with aura1.5581.341 1.806 <0.001
Migraine without aura1.4641.260 1.709 <0.001
Diagnosis by otolaryngologist1.3951.201 1.638 <0.001
Diagnosis by neurologist1.5721.343 1.799 <0.001
Adjusted HR = adjusted hazard ratio (adjusted for the variables listed in Table A2); CI = confidence interval.
Table 4. Assessment of factors associated with the occurrence of migraine among different TBI subgroups using Cox regression analysis.
Table 4. Assessment of factors associated with the occurrence of migraine among different TBI subgroups using Cox regression analysis.
TBI SubgroupPopulationsAdjusted HR95% CIp ValueAdjusted HR95% CIp Value
Without TBI604,392Reference
With TBI151,0981.4841.2761.724<0.001
OPD45,3301.2511.0811.459<0.001Reference
ER54,7831.2931.1201.498<0.0011.0600.8781.3650.124
ADM50,9851.9151.6482.222<0.0011.5571.2031.837<0.001
Without brain surgery84,4561.4951.3111.739<0.001Reference *
Without OT/PT43,7271.5361.3211.784<0.001Reference
With OT/PT40,7291.5041.2931.742<0.0010.9780.6131.1740.389
With brain surgery66,6421.4691.2651.708<0.0010.9980.6621.2340.472
Without OT/PT34,4921.4891.2811.730<0.0010.9650.6041.1360.427
With OT/PT32,1501.3771.1861.605<0.0010.8930.5881.0250.433
Without OT/PT78,2191.4871.3131.768<0.001Reference
With OT/PT72,8791.4521.2401.682<0.0010.9830.6241.1990.397
ISS < 16103,1531.2331.0601.435<0.001Reference
ISS ≥ 1647,9452.0231.7422.359<0.0011.6701.3252.011<0.001
Without pharmacological treatment31,2961.4801.2711.719<0.001Reference
With pharmacological treatment119,8021.4851.2791.727<0.0011.0010.6721.2870.594
Adjusted HR = adjusted hazard ratio (adjusted for the variables listed in Table A3); CI = confidence interval. * Compared with those with brain surgery.
Table 5. Crosstab of brain surgery and OT/PT in the TBI cohort.
Table 5. Crosstab of brain surgery and OT/PT in the TBI cohort.
Brain SurgeryTotalWithWithoutp *
Variablesn%n%n%
Total151,09810066,64244.1184,45655.89
OT/PT 0.945
Without78,21951.7734,49251.7643,72751.77
With72,87948.2332,15048.2440,72948.23
* p: Chi-square test.
Table 6. Duration (months) and intensity (times) of OT/PT within one year of TBI occurrence.
Table 6. Duration (months) and intensity (times) of OT/PT within one year of TBI occurrence.
Brain SurgeryPopulationDuration (Months)
Mean (SD)
p *Intensity (Times)
Mean (SD)
p *
With32,15011.14 (10.22) 7.4 (6.7)
Without40,7299.86 (9.51) 6.7 (6.3)
Overall72,87910.42 (9.85)<0.0017.0 (6.5)<0.001
* p: independent t-test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, M.-H.; Sung, Y.-F.; Chien, W.-C.; Chung, C.-H.; Chen, J.-W. Risk of Migraine after Traumatic Brain Injury and Effects of Injury Management Levels and Treatment Modalities: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041530

AMA Style

Chen M-H, Sung Y-F, Chien W-C, Chung C-H, Chen J-W. Risk of Migraine after Traumatic Brain Injury and Effects of Injury Management Levels and Treatment Modalities: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(4):1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041530

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Mei-Hui, Yueh-Feng Sung, Wu-Chien Chien, Chi-Hsiang Chung, and Jeng-Wen Chen. 2023. "Risk of Migraine after Traumatic Brain Injury and Effects of Injury Management Levels and Treatment Modalities: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 4: 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041530

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop