Next Article in Journal
Efficacy and Safety of Roxadustat in Chinese Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Association of Hepatitis B and C Virus with the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease and Cerebrovascular Disease in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
Predicting the Absolute Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Asian Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Comparing the COOL-AF Risk Score with CARS/mCARS Models for Absolute Risk and the CHA2DS2-VASc Score
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Crosstalk between the Cannabinoid Receptors and Nociceptin Receptors in Colitis—Clinical Implications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/jcm12072451
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Why Does Obesity as an Inflammatory Condition Predispose to Colorectal Cancer?

by
Anna Maria Rychter
1,*,
Liliana Łykowska-Szuber
1,
Agnieszka Zawada
1,
Aleksandra Szymczak-Tomczak
1,
Alicja Ewa Ratajczak
1,2,
Kinga Skoracka
1,2,
Michalina Kolan
3,
Agnieszka Dobrowolska
1 and
Iwona Krela-Kaźmierczak
1,*
1
Department of Gastroenterology, Dietetics and Internal Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Przybyszewskiego 49, 60-355 Poznan, Poland
2
Doctoral School, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Bukowska 70, 60-812 Poznan, Poland
3
Faculty of Medicine Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(7), 2451; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072451
Submission received: 31 December 2022 / Revised: 4 March 2023 / Accepted: 20 March 2023 / Published: 23 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer and Inflammation in the Gastrointestinal Tract)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Obesity is a complex and multifactorial problem of global importance. Additionally, obesity causes chronic inflammation, upregulates cell growth, disturbs the immune system, and causes genomic instability, increasing the risk of carcinogenesis. Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers, and it has become a global problem. In 2018, there were around 1.8 million new cases and around 881,000 deaths worldwide. Another risk factor of colorectal cancer associated with obesity is poor diet. A Western diet, including a high intake of red and processed meat and a low consumption of whole grains, fruits, vegetables, and fiber, may increase the risk of both colorectal cancer and obesity. Moreover, the Western diet is associated with a proinflammatory profile diet, which may also affect chronic low-grade inflammation. In fact, people with obesity often present gut dysbiosis, increased inflammation, and risk of colorectal cancer. In this article, the association between obesity and colorectal cancer is discussed, including the most important mechanisms, such as low-grade chronic inflammation, gut dysbiosis, and poor diet.

1. Introduction

The overall number of people with obesity worldwide has tripled compared to 1975. According to available data, in 2016, more than 1.9 billion adults were overweight (39% of the adult population), and 650 million had obesity (13% of the population). Obesity is an essential factor affecting cancerogenesis. It is linked to cancer development by several mechanisms, e.g., by sustaining proliferative signaling, increasing tumor-promoting inflammatory cytokines, affecting immune functions, upregulating cell growth, and/or suppressing cell death. Moreover, obesity is a disease linked to chronic low-grade inflammation associated with increased genomic instability [1].
Further, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. It is estimated that nearly two million patients were diagnosed with this type of cancer in 2020. Approximately one million people die annually from colorectal cancer [2]. The incidence of CRC is associated with numerous modifiable and non-modifiable factors, most of which have been well studied and understood [3]. Non-modifiable factors include age and hereditary factors. Modifiable factors include diet and lifestyle factors, such as low physical activity, being overweight (BMI (kg/m2) in the ranges of 25–29.9) or having obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2), poor diet (including excessive red meat consumption, low dietary fiber intake, and alcohol drinking), and smoking [4].
In recent years, reports confirming the link between inflammation and cancer development have increased [5,6]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), both obesity and colorectal cancer are significant health problems in an increasingly young population as well.
Researchers are particularly interested in the link between obesity and the incidence of colorectal cancer [7]. Chronic inflammation has recently been shown to be a key factor predisposing towards CRC development [8], and several reviews can be found on this topic. For example, a review by Malhab et al. focused on the molecular level of the CRC–obesity relationship [9]. Immunological signaling pathways in the inflamed intestinal mucosa, which include nuclear factor (NF)-κB, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)/cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), interleukin (IL)-6/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), and IL-23/T helper 17 cells (Th17), lead to tumorigenesis. In addition, reactive oxygen species derived directly from inflammatory cells can interfere with carcinogenic genes, such as p53. On the other hand, a review by Vazzana et al. also focused on adipose tissue and chosen adipokines [10]. Adipose tissue functions as an endocrine organ that regulates the body’s energy and metabolic homeostasis. It has been suggested that excess adipose tissue promotes the secretion of numerous adipokines, cytokines, and free radicals. Thus, potential mechanisms underlying the association of obesity with CRC pathogenesis include adipocytokine imbalance, insulin resistance, changes in the insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1/IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R) axis, and chronic inflammation and oxidative stress [2].
However, apart from obesity itself, other obesity-related factors can also affect chronic inflammation, indirectly increasing the risk of CRC. For example, a growing body of research also highlights the link between obesity, bacterial dysbiosis, and consequent intestinal barrier dysfunction and the incidence of colorectal cancer. The development of CRC is associated with the loss of intestinal barrier integrity and the activation of proinflammatory IL-23/IL-17 signaling, leading to tumorigenesis [11]. Species associated with the development of CRC include Fusobacterium Nucleatum, Streptococcus gallolyticus, Bacteroides fragilis, E. coli, and Enterococcus faecalis. In individuals with obesity, the composition of the intestinal microbiome is poorer in bacteria with anti-inflammatory effects. The microbiome’s influence on inflammatory pathways leading directly to carcinogenesis has also been postulated [12]. However, in recent years, the possibility of dietary interventions aimed at influencing the gut microbiota and inflammatory pathways has also been postulated to have a potential protective effect against carcinogenesis. This could provide an additional diet-related perspective, as generally, poor diet is an important and common factor leading to both obesity and colorectal cancer. It can affect carcinogenesis in the colon through direct effects on the immune system and inflammation and indirectly through hyperalimentation, leading to overweight and obesity, which are CRC risk factors.
The purpose of this article is to introduce the reader to the vital relationship between obesity related to chronic and low-grade inflammation and the incidence of colorectal cancer and to highlight the importance of other obesity-related factors that can indirectly increase CRC risk by increasing obesity-related inflammation. Knowing and understanding how obesity leads to tumorigenesis is an essential step in developing therapies for patients with obesity and colorectal cancer.

2. Colorectal Cancer

2.1. Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers. It ranks third in terms of incidence and is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. In 2018, there were around 1.8 million new cases and around 881,000 deaths worldwide [13]. With the continuous progress of civilization, the incidence of colorectal cancer is projected to increase to 2.2 million new cases and 1.1 million deaths worldwide by 2030 [13]. The median age of patients at diagnosis is 72 years in women and 68 years in men. For rectal cancer, the median age is 63 years for both sexes. Although colorectal cancer still ranks high, its incidence and mortality have decreased in recent years in Europe and the USA. There has been a 2–3% decline per year since 2000 [14]. The observed trend is undoubtedly associated with extensive screening programs and, thus, with the possibility of preventing cancer development by removing precancerous lesions, as well as with greater public awareness of both the detection and prevention of colorectal cancer. The 5-year survival rate in this type of cancer is 60%, considering all stages of the disease. Considering only advanced cancer with metastases, the prognosis is definitively worse. In this subgroup, 5-year survival is observed in 14% of patients [14]. It is estimated that 608,570 Americans will die of cancer in 2021, which is equivalent to more than 1600 deaths per day. The largest number of deaths are lung, prostate, and colorectal cancers in men and lung, breast, and colorectal cancers in women [14]. Although, as mentioned above, colorectal cancer is detected mainly around the age of 70, much attention has been paid in recent years to early colorectal cancer, i.e., cases that are detected before the age of 50. In 2010, the incidence this type of cancer was 4.8% for colon cancers and 9.5% for rectal cancers [15]. Although the incidence of colorectal cancer is decreasing, many studies report an increased incidence of colorectal cancer among younger patients. The research by Pan et al. on the incidence of early colorectal cancer is interesting [16]. These researchers found a 136.9% increase in cases worldwide in 2019, compared to the previous thirty years. They see the reason for this state, among others, in the increase in economic status in many regions. Behavioral changes are observed, especially in developing countries. These include a higher consumption of highly processed foods and red meat, physical inactivity, obesity, smoking, and higher alcohol consumption. This lifestyle is characteristic mainly of people born in the second half of the 20th century. More than half of the cases of colorectal cancer occur in highly developed countries [17,18].
Ma et al. in a meta-analysis of 41 studies on generalized obesity and 13 studies on central obesity, correlated these conditions with an increased risk of colorectal cancer [19]. It is estimated that around 11% of European colorectal cancer cases are related to overweight or obesity in Europe. Epidemiological data suggest that obesity is associated with a 30–70% increased risk of colorectal cancer in men; this relationship is not as high in females [20,21]. Since 2019, the diagnosis and treatment of cancer have been affected by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic [22,23]. Limited access to healthcare facilities has led to cancer diagnosis and treatment delays. This will undoubtedly be associated with a temporary decrease in the incidence of cancer in the last 2 years, but also with a subsequent increase in the incidence of cancer in the advanced stage of the disease. However, we do not yet have population data on this subject.

2.2. Risk Factors of Colorectal Cancer

Both environmental and genetic factors play a role in the etiology of colorectal cancer. The cumulative lifetime risk of colorectal cancer in the general population ranges from 5–6%. In a quarter of patients, a potential, identifiable genetic cause can be found [24]. If a first-line family member has had colorectal cancer, the risk of developing the disease doubles and increases with the number of affected relatives—e.g., with two or more relatives affected, the risk increases even four-fold [25]. In sporadic colorectal cancer, a positive family history confirms the participation of low penetrance genetic factors [26,27]. Lynch syndrome is the most common inherited colorectal cancer syndrome. Patients covered by this syndrome account for 5–10% of all cases [28,29]. This syndrome is caused by a mutation in one of the DNA mismatch repair genes: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, or EPCAM [30]. The second most common hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome is Familial Polyposis Syndrome (FAP). This syndrome is associated with gene mutations that control the Wnt-signaling pathway [31].
The risk of developing colorectal cancer also increases among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases, mainly ulcerative colitis. It is estimated that 1% of colorectal cancer patients are IBD patients [32]. In recent years, there has been a decrease in the number of cases in this group of patients. This is due to improved treatment and supervision of these patients [33].
As mentioned above, the incidence of colorectal cancer is higher in highly industrialized countries [17,18]. This is related to the influence of environmental factors on the occurrence of this type of cancer. Studies in the literature have proven that 16–71% of cancer cases in Europe and the United States are colorectal cancer, which can be directly related to lifestyle [34,35].
These lifestyle factors include smoking, higher alcohol consumption, a diet rich in highly processed products, the consumption of red meat, and physical inactivity. Obesity has been shown to increase the risk of colorectal cancer by about 2–3% for every one-unit increase in BMI above normal weight [36]. It should be noted here that the dominant view in research is that the risk of colorectal cancer is higher in visceral obesity compared to subcutaneous obesity [20]. In addition, obesity is associated with poorer treatment outcomes and higher mortality. The mechanisms linking obesity and colorectal cancer are still the subject of much research [19]. Nutritional factors also may affect the risk of CRC development [37]. According to a meta-analysis, dietary fiber, especially from cereal and whole grains, decreases the risk of colorectal cancer [38]. Vitamin D also influences CRC risk. Hernández-Alonso et al. reported that circulating vitamin D correlates negatively with the risk of colorectal cancer [39]. The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition reported that calcium and dairy product intake is inversely associated with the risk of CRC [40]. It is vital to acknowledge that physical activity plays an important role in the prevention of CRC. The World Cancer Fund International found that physical activity decreases the risk of CRC [41]. In their study, Morris et al. reported that a higher level of physical activity was associated with a lower CRC risk [42]. Several studies have also been devoted to the preventive effect of drugs. There are reports in the literature about the beneficial effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin, statins, and hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women; however, none of these drugs have found an unquestionable place in the prevention of colorectal cancer; researchers believe that their preventive effect may be related to the patient’s genotype [43,44].
Among environmental factors in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer, much attention in the literature is devoted to the role of intestinal microbiota. There is increasing evidence that it plays a role in both the initiation and progression of bowel cancers. The intestinal microbiome analysis showed differences in the composition between healthy people and patients with colorectal cancer [45,46]. Changes in the microbiome have also been observed in the early stages of cancer. Researchers suggest that the analysis of the microbiome’s composition may be an early marker of colorectal cancer detection; on the other hand, its appropriate modulation may reduce the risk of its formation. Further research is needed in this area [47].

3. Obesity and Colorectal Cancer

3.1. Epidemiology of Obesity as a Risk Factor for Colorectal Cancer

Obesity is a complex and multifactorial problem of global importance. According to the WHO, the population of people with obesity has tripled since 1975. Regardless of gender, age, and material status, excess body weight and its implications are a growing problem with epidemic status [2,48]. According to the WHO, every third person over 18 years old in 2016 was overweight, and 13% of the population had obesity [49,50]. Such a rapid and large increase in obesity statistics is extremely worrying, since obesity is considered an essential environmental risk factor for CRC. It is estimated that among people with obesity, the risk of CRC is 7% to up to 60% higher than among healthy individuals [51,52]. Further, according to the available data, sex-related differences can be observed when investigating obesity and CRC risk, with possibly higher risk among men with obesity than among women with obesity [51]. Sex-related differences can be multifactorial, but several behavioral factors could explain the observed differences. For example, men are more likely than women to abuse alcohol, smoke cigarettes, and follow a diet that includes large amounts of red meat and processed foods [53]. Obesity-related increased risk of CRC can depend on whether obesity is general (measured only by BMI), central (for example, waist circumference), or even on the duration of obesity.
According to the meta-analysis of Goodarzi et al., the association between obesity and increased CRC risk is irrespective of metabolic status; however, sex-related differences were also observed [54]. Among metabolically healthy obesity and metabolically unhealthy obesity, a 14% and 24% increased risk of CRC was observed, respectively; however, when gender was taken into account, the increased risk of CRC was still significant only for men. Interestingly, it should be noted that metabolic abnormality—even when body weight is normal—was associated with a 19% increased risk of CRC (OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.09−1.31). In a study by Li et al. BMI, waist–hip ratio (WHR), and waist circumference (WC) were associated with a significantly increased risk of colon (not rectal) cancer in men only [55]. For the highest quintile of BMI, WHR, and WC, hazard ratios (HRs) for colon cancer were 2.15, 1.97, and 2.00, respectively. On the other hand, in a study by MacInnis et al., central obesity was positively associated with the risk of colon cancer among women. In this cohort, each 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI insignificantly increased the risk of colon cancer by 4% (HR = 1.04 (0.90–1.20), p = 0.59), but each 10 cm of waist circumference significantly increased the risk of colon cancer by 14% (HR = 1.14 (1.02–1.28), p = 0.02) [56].
Interestingly, recent data suggest that obesity at an early age significantly affects colorectal cancer development—and its risk—in later life. In a meta-analysis by Garcia et al. [57], early-life obesity significantly increased the risk of colorectal cancer by 39% (relative risk, RR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.20−1.62) and 19% (RR = 1.19; 95%CI = 1.06−1.35) among men and women, respectively, when compared with controls. Interestingly, in men, obesity during early life more significantly increased the risk of distal colon and rectal cancer than proximal colon cancer—by 51%, 39%, and 6%, respectively. Among women, early-life obesity increased the risk of rectal cancer more significantly than proximal and distal colon cancers—by 38% vs. 8% in both cases, respectively. Similar findings were observed in a study by Hidayat et al., in which each 5 kg/m2 increase in body mass index in early life (<30 years) was significantly associated with a 13% increase in colorectal cancer (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.08, 1.19) [58].
In a meta-analysis by Ma et al., obesity significantly increased CRC risk by 34% (RR = 1.344, 95% CI:1.258–1.436) when compared with normal body weight [19]. A similar risk increase was observed for colon and rectal cancers. Further, a higher waist circumference increased the risk of CRC by 45% compared to a lower waist circumference (RR = 1.455; 95% CI, 1.327–1.596).
Obesity is undoubtedly an important factor in increasing the risk of CRC. However, the findings are not always consistent, and the magnitude of the association greatly varies. Moreover, more studies are needed to investigate observed differences between obesity and the risk of colorectal cancer and anatomic site- and sex-related variables. The summary of selected studies discussing the association between obesity and CRC risk can be seen in Table 1. However, the World Cancer Research Fund International considers overweight and obesity a CRC risk with strong evidence [41].

3.2. Pathogenesis of Colorectal Cancer in Obesity

Although obesity undoubtedly influences CRC risk, the exact mechanism is not fully understood. It is challenging to investigate or to transfer in vitro studies, since obesity does not act through one single pathway but rather affects systemic, metabolic, and further cellular and molecular environments.
Among others, two pathways seem especially essential in the CRC–obesity association—the insulin/insulin-like growth factor axis and PI3K/Akt. Obesity and increased content of visceral adipose tissue are associated with several metabolic changes—e.g., hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance—or increased oxidative stress, altering the insulin–IGF axis. IGF is one of the factors associated with the proliferation and inactivation of apoptosis influencing carcinogenesis. Further, both IGF and insulin activate the PI3K/Akt pathway, leading to increased survival and cell growth, and IGF impairs p53, increasing neoplasia and cell proliferation. It also activates PI3K/Akt/mTORC, as well as Raf/MAPK signaling pathways or glucose transporters [66]. In an vitro study, hyperinsulinemia promoted the growth of colon cancer cells [67].
In a meta-analysis by Renehan et al., circulating IGF-1 concentrations were significantly associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Odds ratios of CRC were 58% increased (1.58 (1.11–2.27)) when the highest and lowest IGF-1 categories were compared [68]. Moreover, a dose–response association was observed; however, it was not statistically significant. Similar findings were observed in another meta-analysis by Rinaldi et al., in which IGF-1 concentrations were modestly associated with CRC risk: each one standard deviation of IGF-1 increased the risk of CRC by 7% (RR = 1.07 (1.01–1.14) [69]. Other studies also confirm the role of IGF-1 concentrations in CRC development [70].
Moreover, adipose tissue macrophages infiltrating into visceral adipose tissue change the M1 (source of proinflammatory cytokines and oxygen radicals) macrophages-to-M2 macrophages ratio, which is an essential microenvironmental factor in obesity-induced adipose tissue inflammation [71,72]. In most tumors, macrophages seem to be switched into the M2 phenotype, providing an immunosuppressive microenvironment and promoting tumor growth, with the obesity-affected extracellular matrix as one of the promoters [73,74].
Further, upregulated secretion of adipokines (e.g., leptin or adiponectin), interleukins (e.g., IL-1, IL-6, IL-12), and proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., THF-α) are associated with low-grade inflammation, contributing to CRC. Several adipokines have been linked to CRC development by affecting signaling pathways (metabolic, inflammatory, and cell cycle) pathways. For example, in in vitro studies, leptin has been found to be an important factor for CRC development in obesity, and it should be noted that serum leptin concentrations can be as much as five times higher among individuals with obesity versus those in normal-weight individuals. Among individuals with obesity, the expression of leptin is altered, leading to increased leptin concentrations—and leptin resistance—and impaired binding to leptin receptors (binding leptin to its receptors inhibits food intake and increases energy expenditure) [75]. Although the exact mechanisms are not fully understood, it is assumed that decreased transport of leptin through the blood–brain barrier is the main cause of leptin resistance [76]. Leptin activates Src kinase and PI3K in the CRC cells LS174T and HM7, inducing activation of Rac1 and Cdc43, promoting carcinogenesis and metastasis [77]. In a study by Endo et al. increased proliferative activity of colonic cells (murine) was observed in the obesity model, and, moreover, increased expression of leptin receptors was observed in colorectal tumors [78]. On the other hand, in decreased leptin concentration conditions (leptin-deficient tumors), a decrease in tumor cell proliferation and tumor growth was observed. However, in vivo studies do not always confirm these results, possibly because of several other interactions with other cytokines or hormones in real-life conditions. For example, in the animal model study of Aparicio et al., hyperleptinemia did not induce variation in tumor volume or weight and did not modify the number, size, or distribution of intestinal adenomas [79].
On the other hand, another adipokine, adiponectin, acts like a regulator of colon epithelial cell homeostasis, but its concentrations are decreased among individuals with obesity. Although the mechanisms need further examination, it is assumed that during obesity-related inflammation, increased concentrations of various proinflammatory cytokines inhibit adiponectin transcription, but this could also be related to dyslipidemia, which negatively correlates with adiponectin levels [80,81]. An in vitro study by Fenton et al. showed that adiponectin acts on preneoplastic colon epithelial cells to regulate cell growth via two distinct pathways, inhibiting leptin-induced nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB)-dependent autocrine IL-6 production and trans-IL-6 signaling [82]. However, in a meta-analysis by Joshi et al. adiponectin was associated with decreased CRC risk in only prospective studies (generally, it did not influence CRC risk).
All the above-mentioned factors affect PI3K/Akt signaling, reducing apoptosis, stimulating cell growth, and increasing proliferation in colon cancer cells. Linked to sustained proliferative signaling, obesity leads to downregulated functions of anti-growth factors and, moreover, the PI3K/Akt pathway is associated with disrupted growth factor receptors, e.g., KRAS, PIK3CA, and PTEN [83,84].

4. Gut Microbiota and Colorectal Cancer

In addition to the usual factors, such as insulin resistance in peripheral tissues, altered secretion of adipocytokines, or dysregulation of fatty acid synthesis, the gut microbiota plays an important role. Among individuals with obesity, the microbiota has a completely different composition than in normal-weight people. Intestinal bacteria are responsible for the breakdown of food residues through fermentation, with the simultaneous production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that provide nutrients for colon epithelial cells. The disruption of the microbiota observed in individuals with obesity, resulting from a change in the ratio of Bacteroides to Firmicutes, is not without its effects on the function of the colonic epithelium.
Bacterial dysbiosis occurring in individuals with obesity caused by an increase in Firmicutes and a decrease in Bacteroides, increased intestinal permeability, and the passage of endotoxic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) beyond the intestinal barrier with a concomitant increase in inflammation in individuals with obesity promotes the transformation of adenoma into invasive cancer [85]. In obesity, increased amounts of LPS activate the CD14 receptor [86]. This complex binds to toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) on macrophages in adipose tissue. The formation of the signaling pathway results in the activation of the expression of genes encoding proinflammatory proteins such as NF-κB and activation protein 1 (AP-1). The administration of Lactobacillus upregulates the expression of the TLR4 and TLR2 receptor, influencing the incidence not only of obesity but also of colon cancer [87]. Higher blood levels of LPS were found in those with villous rather than tubular adenomas [88]. It is also known that a higher BMI is associated with higher levels of LPS in the blood, and a restrictive diet reduces LPS levels [89].
Further, a study by Wilson et al. showed that high fiber intake affects colon epithelial wellbeing and prevents colon cancer [90]. Fiber supplementation increased SCFAs, including butyrate, in addition to increasing the normal proliferation of healthy colonocytes. Butyrate causes strengthening of the intestinal barrier and stimulates the synthesis of anti-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin 10), and it inhibits the activation of nuclear transcription factor kappa B. In addition, it affects the immunogenicity of cancer cells by regulating the activity of proteins involved in apoptosis (Bcl-2, caspase 3, caspase 7) and increasing antioxidant activity [91,92]. Prebiotics also play an important role in preventing intestinal cancer by preventing obesity. In a study by Nicolucci, the author observed a significant increase in Bifidobacterium in children taking inulin fructans. In addition, there was a reduction in total body fat, no excessive weight gain, and a reduction in primary bile acids in the stool. Di-Wei Zheng posited that the use of probiotics and prebiotics can favorably affect the course of colon cancer [93]. In addition, the authors increased the abundance of various SCFA-producing bacteria, including, for example, Eubacterium and Roseburia [94]. In addition to strains typically associated with colorectal cancer risk, such as Fusobaterium nucleatum, patients with this condition have an imbalance of other species in favor of Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, or Bacteroides fragilis and a deficiency of basic strains such as Clostridiales, Lactobacillus, or Bifidobacterium [95,96].
Reduced bacterial diversity in obesity also promotes the development of intestinal cancer [97]. It is also known that altered gene expression and toxic effects of environmental factors play roles in the process of carcinogenesis [98]. Butyrate deficiency is also important in people with colorectal cancer [45]. Thus, in individuals with obesity, the risk of developing intestinal cancer may be increased by significantly reducing the number of SCFA-producing bacteria in the intestine [99]. The co-occurrence of diabetes and obesity increases the risk of colorectal cancer [100]. In T2DM and obesity, a significant decrease in butyrate-producing bacteria, such as Roseburia and Faecalibacterium prauznitzii, has been demonstrated [101]. Branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) are also important in exacerbating insulin resistance and obesity and disrupting insulin action [102]. A high-fat diet rich in BCAA increases the risk of developing T2DM [103]. The intestinal microbiota is one of the most important sources of BCAA. In addition, increased proteolysis of BCAA is associated with an increase in Clostridium. There are many studies that have looked for bacteria pathognomonic for colorectal cancer. One study found that patients with colorectal cancer have a less diverse microbiome than healthy people [46]. Some species, such as Akkermansia spp., Porphyromonadaceae, Alistipes, Staphylococcaceae, and Methanobacteriales, are represented more abundantly in people with colorectal cancer [45]. The amount of others, such as Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Ruminococcus, Faecalibacterium spp., and Roseburia, was significantly reduced in those with the disorder [45]. People with colorectal cancer develop colonization of the gut with bacterial flora typical of the oral cavity [104]. In the Castelarin study, the amount of Fusobacterium equivocated in feces, and tumor tissue was significantly higher in intestinal tumor patients than in non-cancerous samples [105]. It was also found to be the only biomarker for non-invasive screening of colorectal cancer, and colorectal adenoma and adenocarcinoma Fusobacterium nucleatum exerts its carcinogenic effects by increasing cancer cell proliferation and migration and induces Cdk5 expression and activation of the Wnt-/β-catenin-signaling pathway [106]. On the other hand, the main drug used in the pre-diabetic state of insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and obesity—metformin—inhibits colorectal cancer precisely by affecting the mechanism of action of Fusobacterium nucleatum [107]. The role of Akkermansia muciniphila in the process of carcinogenesis in the large intestine is ambiguous; a deficiency in this bacterium is associated with the occurrence of obesity, as well as higher levels of triglycerides and blood glucose [108]. Colorectal cancer patients also showed an increase in E. coli [109]. The amount of mucosa-associated and internalized E. coli is associated with the cell proliferation index, as assessed by Ki-67 expression [110].
Fecal bacteria present in excess in the intestine secrete enzymes such as nitroreductase, glucuronidase, and azoreductase, which catalyze the release of pro-cancerogenic substances in the intestine [111]. It has been observed that there is a decrease in the activity of these enzymes in feces after supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus in both animal and human models [111]. In addition, it is also emphasized that the more frequent occurrence of colon cancer in people with obesity is also associated with increased inflammation. Supplementation with the L. rhamnosus strain may reduce the incidence and multiplicity of colon cancer precisely by inducing cell apoptosis and inhibiting inflammation [112]. Co-supplementation of L. rhamnosus and L. acidophilus has cumulated in an antitumor effect by reducing abnormal foci of intestinal mucosal crypts in rats [113].
Supplementation with L. acidophilus, L. casei, and L. plantarum can also affect the synthesis of linoleic acid. These have a strong anti-proliferative effect and act on colonocytes [114]. Treatment with a mixture of probiotics (L. plantarum, L. acidophilus, and B. longum) in patients with colorectal cancer increased the amount of cell-binding proteins (claudin, occludin, and JAM-1) and their distribution in the colorectal epithelium [115].

5. Diet and Colorectal Cancer

5.1. Diet Predisposing to Obesity, Inflammation, and Colorectal Cancer

Current scientific knowledge points to a link between excessive consumption of saturated fat and animal protein, a low supply of fiber, and a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer [116]. The Western diet is rich in red and processed meats, refined grains, soda, and sweets and low in fruits, vegetables, and whole-grain products [117].
Researchers indicate that Western dietary patterns, in particular, increase the risk of distal colon and rectal tumors. Moreover, the Western diet seems to have a greater influence on the development of tumors that are KRAS wildtype, BRAF wildtype, have no or a low CpG island methylator phenotype, and have microsatellite stability [118].
In addition to the obvious link between the Western lifestyle—potentiated by excess calorie consumption and physical inactivity—and the currently observed epidemy of obesity, the key intermediary in the relationship between diet and colorectal cancer seems to be the intestinal microbiota [116,117,119].
In the lumen of the large intestine of consumers of the Western diet, instead of fiber fermentation with the production of anti-inflammatory, antiproliferative, and immunomodulatory butyrate, there are dominant processes of protein fermentation and bile acid deconjugation into metabolites such as secondary bile acids and hydrogen sulfide, which directly contribute to the destruction of colonocytes or to barrier dysfunction, as well as epithelial permeability, inflammatory, DNA damage, and genotoxic ways, thus increasing the risk of colorectal cancer [116,119].
The Western diet is pro-inflammatory, and Shivappa et al., in a meta-analysis, observed that a Dietary Inflammatory Index (DDI) of food that is potentially proinflammatory increases the risk of CRC [120]. Similar conclusions were reached by Fan et al. in a meta-analysis of eight studies covering 880,380 participants. The authors observed that a proinflammatory diet is independently associated with an increased CRC risk [121].
Scientific research directly points to the role of red and processed meat in the development of colorectal cancer. According to the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) in more than 500,000 individuals, habitual meat consumers had a 20% higher risk of developing CRC compared to non-consumers or occasional consumers of meat [122]. Similarly, in the population-based Norwegian Women and Cancer cohort of 84.538 women, a high processed meat intake of more than 60 g processed meat a day was associated with an increased risk of the proximal colon, distal colon, and rectal cancer compared to consumption of less than 15 g of processed meat a day [123].
Potential mechanisms that may explain the negative effects of red and processed meat include: (1) excess heme iron promoting the growth of mucin-degrading bacteria, e.g., Akkermansia muciniphila; (2) increased production of secondary bile acids and the promotion of carcinogenesis through increased oxidative stress and regulation of the host metabolism; (3) excess metabolism of hydrogen sulfide by sulfur-reducing bacteria from inorganic sulfur used as a preservative in processed meat and amino acid-derived sulfur from red meat; and the promotion of carcinogenesis through DNA damage, impaired colonocyte nutrition, reduced integrity of the mucus layer, induction of epithelial hyperproliferation, and increased inflammation [117,124].
In the area of diet correlating with sulfur-metabolizing bacteria in the gut and colorectal cancer risk, a very interesting study was performed among 214,797 US health professionals free of IBD and cancer at baseline. The authors observed that food groups positively correlated with the abundance of the sulfur-metabolizing bacteria in the gut, including low-calorie beverages, french fries, red meats, and processed meats. Such a microbial sulfur diet, which was also characterized by the low intake of fruits, whole grains, and vegetables, positively correlated with a higher risk of CRC [125]. These outcomes are consistent with data from another analysis of data collected from 51.529 men, in which the authors observed that long-term adherence to a dietary pattern associated with sulfur-metabolizing bacteria in stool increased the risk of distal CRC [126].
Among the factors that also increase the risk of colorectal cancer is alcohol consumption. A meta-analysis of six cohort studies showed that this was the case even with small amounts of alcohol consumption. Compared with nondrinking or occasional alcohol drinking, very light (≤0.5 drink/day) or light (≤1 drink/day) drinking increased the incidence of male colorectal cancer by 6%. Potential mechanisms explaining this correlation include acetaldehyde production in the colon, cell proliferation due to ethanol or acetaldehyde exposure, and alterations in DNA repair mechanisms [127]. Furthermore, in a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies, there was a modest positive association between heavy alcohol drinking (>50 g/day of ethanol) and CRC mortality [128].

5.2. Diet Protecting against the Development of Obesity, Inflammation, and Colorectal Cancer

The Mediterranean diet (MD) is a dietary pattern typical for the population living in the Mediterranean Basin. The MD is characterized by a high intake of plant foods (e.g., vegetables, fruits, and grains), a moderate intake of dairy products, fish, and eggs, and a low intake of red meat and sweets [129]. According to the study, a high adherence to the MD protects against colorectal cancer, especially distal colon cancer in men [130]. According to Acevedo-León, MD increased the level of glutathione peroxidase. Additionally, this diet decreased 8-oxoDG (8-oxo-7′8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine), which is one of the oxidized DNA bases in colorectal cancer patients [131]. Additionally, the Mediterranean diet contains many components that reduce the risk of colorectal cancer, e.g., fruits and vegetables, which contain fiber that protects against colorectal cancer [132]. Moreover, the Mediterranean diet is rich in fish, the consumption of which is also inversely associated with the risk of colorectal cancer [133]. An American study showed that a high intake of vegetables, fruits, and fat-reduced foods and a low frequency of meat and potato consumption reduced the risk of colorectal cancer [134]. Moreover, phenolic compounds of olive oil reduce proliferation, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis due to regulating numerous signaling pathways [135]. Additionally, the MD decreases gut microbiota and strengthens the immune system, decreasing inflammation [136].
The systematic review showed that vitamin D protects against colorectal cancer, and the Mediterranean diet was the only dietary pattern that may prevent this type of cancer. Surprisingly, vegetarians, whose diet is rich in fruits and vegetables, present a higher risk of colorectal cancer than meat eaters [137]. On the other hand, Wu et al. reported that plant-based diets are associated with a decreased risk of colorectal cancer; however, the risk depends on the quality of the diet [138].
According to the American Institute for Cancer Research, there is strong evidence that whole grains, food containing fiber, calcium supplements, and dairy products protect against colorectal cancer [41]. A meta-analysis showed that the risk of colorectal cancer is decreased by 17% for each 90 g/day increase in whole grain [133]. In fact, fiber consumption was inversely correlated with CRP [139], so it probably affects inflammation. Whole-grain food consumption also decreases at least one level of inflammatory markers [140]. Additionally, Harland and Garton reported that whole-grain consumption was associated with lower BMI and visceral adiposity [141]. In turn, many dairy products contain probiotic bacteria that modulate the gut microbiota composition, affecting the immune system [142]. Additionally, a high-dairy diet affects the expression of genes related to inflammation pathways [143]. Vieira et al. in a meta-analysis, reported that the risk of colorectal cancer is decreased by 13% for each 400 g/d increase in dairy products [133].
Additionally, body fat increases the risk of colorectal cancer. However, there has been no study referring to the reduction in colorectal risk after body weight loss [144]. Bariatric surgery decreased the risk of breast and endometrial cancer, but there was no association between bariatric surgery and other types of cancer, including colorectal cancer [145]. However, physical activity, which is part of obesity therapy, decreases the risk of colorectal cancer [146].
In conclusion, the Mediterranean diet and the high consumption of vegetables, fruits, whole grains, and dairy products may affect the body mass, gut microbiota, and immune system. Therefore, these practices decrease inflammation and reduce the risk of colorectal cancer.
A summary of dietary factors and the risk of CRC is presented in Table 2.

6. Sedentary Lifestyle

Regular physical activity presents a preventive role for CRC development and decreases the risk of CRC by 12% to 28%, depending on the level of physical activity [148]. Moreover, the mortality and recurrence rates in patients after diagnosis are lower in physically active patients than in patients lacking regular physical activity, highlighting its role in tertiary prevention [149]. Mechanisms explaining this association include reductions in circulating insulin and IGF-1 and proinflammatory cytokines and leptin through the reduction of adiposity [150,151] and the regulation of DNA damage and repair [148].
Sedentary behaviors are defined as activities with energy expenditures of ≤1.5 the metabolic equivalents of tasks (METs) performed in the sitting, reclining, or lying postures, e.g., watching television, reading a book, or working at a computer [151].
According to the 2018 PAGA Committee Scientific Report, there is moderate evidence that sedentary behavior is associated with an increased risk of colon cancer [152].

7. Summary and Conclusions

Obesity is associated with low-grade inflammation, an unfavorable adipokine profile, macrophage recruitment, and oxidative stress, increasing the risk of colorectal cancer (Figure 1). However, as we have discussed in our paper, many other obesity-related factors, e.g., an unhealthy diet and gut microbiota dysbiosis, are undoubtedly associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Taking the current data presented in the manuscript into account, the question we should be asking is not about the (at this moment obvious) correlation between obesity and diet, but rather how we should modify the current approach to the treatment of obesity in order to decrease obesity-related cancer risk more significantly (Figure 2). Although in the case of proper dietary behaviors or physical activity, the case seems more clear, with regard to other, no less essential aspects, more studies are definitely needed. An anti-inflammatory diet, including a high intake of polyphenols (e.g., fresh fruits and vegetables, high-quality vegetable and fish oils), fiber, and dairy products, along with a decreased consumption of red and processed meat, alcohol, and simple sugars, will be essential in mitigating both obesity and CRC risk. Moreover, behavioral and clinical treatments should focus on weight reduction, not only because of the beneficial effect on metabolic health, but also in order to decrease obesity-related increased risk of cancerogenesis and, moreover, to improve tertiary prevention. Further, the treatment of gut dysbiosis, which is frequently present among individuals with obesity, seems to be intriguing aspect, possibly decreasing CRC risk, and providing a new insight into primary prevention. Nevertheless, more RCTs are needed to provide direct guidelines regarding the type and duration of probiotic supplementation (with Lactobacillus as a potentially beneficial strain). The microbiota-centered approach should include dietary modifications in the context of improving intestinal integrity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.K.-K. and A.D.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.R., L.Ł.-S., A.Z., A.S.-T., A.E.R., K.S. and M.K.; writing—review and editing, A.M.R., L.Ł.-S., A.Z., A.S.-T., A.E.R., K.S., M.K., A.D. and I.K.-K.; visualization, A.M.R.; supervision, I.K.-K.; project administration, I.K.-K.; funding acquisition, A.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available in a publicly accessible. The data presented in this study are openly available in Medline and PubMed databases and on the publisher’s website. The keywords that were used: colorectal cancer; diet; obesity; inflammation; cytokines; microbiota. All data in the text are quoted and all works used are listed in the bibliography along with doi and reference numbers.

Acknowledgments

Anna Maria Rychter, Alicja Ewa Ratajczak, and Kinga Skoracka are participants in the STER Internationalisation of Doctoral Schools Programme from NAWA Polish National Agency. Figures were created with BioRender.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CRCcolorectal cancer
WHOWorld Health Organization
IARCInternational Agency for Research on Cancer
IBDinflammatory bowel disease
IGF-1insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1
IGF-1RIGF-1 receptor
ILinterleukin
TNFtumor necrosis factor
WHRwaist-to-hip ratio
WCwaist circumference
HRhazard ratio
RRrelative risk
LPSlipopolysaccharide
BCAAbranched-chain amino acid
SCFAsshort-chain fatty acids
TLR-4toll-like receptor 4

References

  1. Khanna, D.; Khanna, S.; Khanna, P.; Kahar, P.; Patel, B.M. Obesity: A Chronic Low-Grade Inflammation and Its Markers. Cureus 2022, 14, e22711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Obesity and Overweight. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight (accessed on 12 January 2020).
  3. Giovannucci, E. Modifiable Risk Factors for Colon Cancer. Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am. 2002, 31, 925–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lewandowska, A.; Rudzki, G.; Lewandowski, T.; Stryjkowska-Góra, A.; Rudzki, S. Title: Risk Factors for the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Control. 2022, 29, 10732748211056692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lu, H.; Ouyang, W.; Huang, C. Inflammation, a Key Event in Cancer Development. Mol. Cancer Res. 2006, 4, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Izano, M.; Wei, E.K.; Tai, C.; Swede, H.; Gregorich, S.; Harris, T.B.; Klepin, H.; Satterfield, S.; Murphy, R.; Newman, A.B.; et al. Chronic Inflammation and Risk of Colorectal and Other Obesity-Related Cancers: The Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. Int. J. Cancer 2016, 138, 1118–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Aleksandrova, K.; Nimptsch, K.; Pischon, T. Obesity and Colorectal Cancer. Front. Biosci. (Elite Ed.) 2013, 5, 61–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Itzkowitz, S.H.; Yio, X. Inflammation and Cancer IV. Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Role of Inflammation. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2004, 287, G7–G17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bou Malhab, L.J.; Abdel-Rahman, W.M. Obesity and Inflammation: Colorectal Cancer Engines. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 2022, 15, 620–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vazzana, N.; Riondino, S.; Toto, V.; Guadagni, F.; Roselli, M.; Davi, G.; Ferroni, P. Obesity-Driven Inflammation and Colorectal Cancer. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 5837–5853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Grivennikov, S.I.; Wang, K.; Mucida, D.; Stewart, C.A.; Schnabl, B.; Jauch, D.; Taniguchi, K.; Yu, G.-Y.; Osterreicher, C.H.; Hung, K.E.; et al. Adenoma-Linked Barrier Defects and Microbial Products Drive IL-23/IL-17-Mediated Tumour Growth. Nature 2012, 491, 254–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Obesity-Linked Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis Associated with Derangements in Gut Permeability and Intestinal Cellular Homeostasis Independent of Diet—PubMed. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30250849/ (accessed on 27 December 2022).
  13. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators Global Burden of 369 Diseases and Injuries in 204 Countries and Territories, 1990-2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020, 396, 1204–1222. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cancer Statistics, 2021—Siegel—2021—CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians—Wiley Online Library. Available online: https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21654 (accessed on 27 December 2022).
  15. Bailey, C.E.; Hu, C.-Y.; You, Y.N.; Bednarski, B.K.; Rodriguez-Bigas, M.A.; Skibber, J.M.; Cantor, S.B.; Chang, G.J. Increasing Disparities in the Age-Related Incidences of Colon and Rectal Cancers in the United States, 1975-2010. JAMA Surg. 2015, 150, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Pan, H.; Zhao, Z.; Deng, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Huang, Y.; Huang, S.; Chi, P. The Global, Regional, and National Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Burden and Trends from 1990 to 2019: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. BMC Public Health 2022, 22, 1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Soerjomataram, I.; Hayes, R.B.; Bray, F.; Weber, T.K.; Jemal, A. Global Patterns and Trends in Colorectal Cancer Incidence in Young Adults. Gut 2019, 68, 2179–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Mauri, G.; Sartore-Bianchi, A.; Russo, A.-G.; Marsoni, S.; Bardelli, A.; Siena, S. Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in Young Individuals. Mol. Oncol. 2019, 13, 109–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Ma, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhang, P.; Shi, C.; Zou, Y.; Qin, H. Obesity and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Prospective Studies. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bardou, M.; Barkun, A.N.; Martel, M. Obesity and Colorectal Cancer. Gut 2013, 62, 933–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Soltani, G.; Poursheikhani, A.; Yassi, M.; Hayatbakhsh, A.; Kerachian, M.; Kerachian, M.A. Obesity, Diabetes and the Risk of Colorectal Adenoma and Cancer. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2019, 19, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Harber, I.; Zeidan, D.; Aslam, M.N. Colorectal Cancer Screening: Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic and Possible Consequences. Life 2021, 11, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abu-Freha, N.; Hizkiya, R.; Abu-Abed, M.; Michael, T.; Jacob, B.M.; Rouvinov, K.; Schwartz, D.; Reshef, A.; Netz, U.; Pinsk, I.; et al. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Colorectal and Gastric Cancer Diagnosis, Disease Stage and Mortality. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 954878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Grady, W.M. Genetic Testing for High-Risk Colon Cancer Patients. Gastroenterology 2003, 124, 1574–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Butterworth, A.S.; Higgins, J.P.T.; Pharoah, P. Relative and Absolute Risk of Colorectal Cancer for Individuals with a Family History: A Meta-Analysis. Eur. J. Cancer 2006, 42, 216–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Baidoun, F.; Elshiwy, K.; Elkeraie, Y.; Merjaneh, Z.; Khoudari, G.; Sarmini, M.T.; Gad, M.; Al-Husseini, M.; Saad, A. Colorectal Cancer Epidemiology: Recent Trends and Impact on Outcomes. Curr. Drug Targets 2021, 22, 998–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. O’Sullivan, D.E.; Sutherland, R.L.; Town, S.; Chow, K.; Fan, J.; Forbes, N.; Heitman, S.J.; Hilsden, R.J.; Brenner, D.R. Risk Factors for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 20, 1229–1240.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kampman, E. A First-Degree Relative with Colorectal Cancer: What Are We Missing? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prevent. 2007, 16, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hampel, H.; Frankel, W.L.; Martin, E.; Arnold, M.; Khanduja, K.; Kuebler, P.; Clendenning, M.; Sotamaa, K.; Prior, T.; Westman, J.A.; et al. Feasibility of Screening for Lynch Syndrome Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26, 5783–5788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Tiwari, A.K.; Roy, H.K.; Lynch, H.T. Lynch Syndrome in the 21st Century: Clinical Perspectives. QJM 2016, 109, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Vasen, H.F.A.; Tomlinson, I.; Castells, A. Clinical Management of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 12, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Leong, R.W.L.; Koo, J.H. Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2009, 24, 503–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Castaño-Milla, C.; Chaparro, M.; Gisbert, J.P. Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: The Declining Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Ulcerative Colitis. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther. 2014, 39, 645–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Platz, E.A.; Willett, W.C.; Colditz, G.A.; Rimm, E.B.; Spiegelman, D.; Giovannucci, E. Proportion of Colon Cancer Risk That Might Be Preventable in a Cohort of Middle-Aged US Men. Cancer Causes Control 2000, 11, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Aleksandrova, K.; Pischon, T.; Jenab, M.; Bueno-de-Mesquita, H.B.; Fedirko, V.; Norat, T.; Romaguera, D.; Knüppel, S.; Boutron-Ruault, M.-C.; Dossus, L.; et al. Combined Impact of Healthy Lifestyle Factors on Colorectal Cancer: A Large European Cohort Study. BMC Med. 2014, 12, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Alcohol Drinking and Colorectal Cancer Risk: An Overall and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Published Studies—PubMed. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21307158/ (accessed on 27 December 2022).
  37. Effects of Regular Aspirin on Long-Term Cancer Incidence and Metastasis: A Systematic Comparison of Evidence from Observational Studies versus Randomised Trials—PubMed. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22440112/ (accessed on 27 December 2022).
  38. Aune, D.; Chan, D.S.M.; Lau, R.; Vieira, R.; Greenwood, D.C.; Kampman, E.; Norat, T. Dietary Fibre, Whole Grains, and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies. BMJ 2011, 343, d6617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Hernández-Alonso, P.; Boughanem, H.; Canudas, S.; Becerra-Tomás, N.; Fernández de la Puente, M.; Babio, N.; Macias-Gonzalez, M.; Salas-Salvadó, J. Circulating Vitamin D Levels and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Case-Control and Prospective Cohort Studies. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Papadimitriou, N.; Bouras, E.; van den Brandt, P.A.; Muller, D.C.; Papadopoulou, A.; Heath, A.K.; Critselis, E.; Gunter, M.J.; Vineis, P.; Ferrari, P.; et al. A Prospective Diet-Wide Association Study for Risk of Colorectal Cancer in EPIC. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 20, 864–873.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Clinton, S.K.; Giovannucci, E.L.; Hursting, S.D. The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Third Expert Report on Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Cancer: Impact and Future Directions. J. Nutr. 2020, 150, 663–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Morris, J.S.; Bradbury, K.E.; Cross, A.J.; Gunter, M.J.; Murphy, N. Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Colorectal Cancer Risk in the UK Biobank. Br. J. Cancer 2018, 118, 920–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Andersen, V.; Vogel, U. Systematic Review: Interactions between Aspirin, and Other Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs, and Polymorphisms in Relation to Colorectal Cancer. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther. 2014, 40, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Nan, H.; Hutter, C.M.; Lin, Y.; Jacobs, E.J.; Ulrich, C.M.; White, E.; Baron, J.A.; Berndt, S.I.; Brenner, H.; Butterbach, K.; et al. Association of Aspirin and NSAID Use with Risk of Colorectal Cancer According to Genetic Variants. JAMA 2015, 313, 1133–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Borges Canha, M. Role of Colonic Microbiota in Colorectal Carcinogenesis: A Systematic Review. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 2015, 107, 659–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ahn, J.; Sinha, R.; Pei, Z.; Dominianni, C.; Wu, J.; Shi, J.; Goedert, J.J.; Hayes, R.B.; Yang, L. Human Gut Microbiome and Risk for Colorectal Cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2013, 105, 1907–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Cheng, Y.; Ling, Z.; Li, L. The Intestinal Microbiota and Colorectal Cancer. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 615056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Chooi, Y.C.; Ding, C.; Magkos, F. The Epidemiology of Obesity. Metabolism 2019, 92, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Chaplin, A.; Rodriguez, R.M.; Segura-Sampedro, J.J.; Ochogavía-Seguí, A.; Romaguera, D.; Barceló-Coblijn, G. Insights behind the Relationship between Colorectal Cancer and Obesity: Is Visceral Adipose Tissue the Missing Link? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Avgerinos, K.I.; Spyrou, N.; Mantzoros, C.S.; Dalamaga, M. Obesity and Cancer Risk: Emerging Biological Mechanisms and Perspectives. Metabolism 2019, 92, 121–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Rubinstein, M.M.; Brown, K.A.; Iyengar, N.M. Targeting Obesity-Related Dysfunction in Hormonally Driven Cancers. Br. J. Cancer 2021, 125, 495–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. White, A.; Ironmonger, L.; Steele, R.J.C.; Ormiston-Smith, N.; Crawford, C.; Seims, A. A Review of Sex-Related Differences in Colorectal Cancer Incidence, Screening Uptake, Routes to Diagnosis, Cancer Stage and Survival in the UK. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Goodarzi, G.; Mozaffari, H.; Raeisi, T.; Mehravar, F.; Razi, B.; Ghazi, M.L.; Garousi, N.; Alizadeh, S.; Janmohammadi, P. Metabolic Phenotypes and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. BMC Cancer 2022, 22, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, H.; Yang, G.; Xiang, Y.-B.; Gao, J.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, W.; Gao, Y.-T.; Shu, X.-O. Body Weight, Fat Distribution and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Report from Cohort Studies of 134 255 Chinese Men and Women. Int. J. Obes. 2013, 37, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. MacInnis, R.J.; English, D.R.; Hopper, J.L.; Haydon, A.M.; Gertig, D.M.; Giles, G.G. Body Size and Composition and Colon Cancer Risk in Men. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2004, 13, 553–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Garcia, H.; Song, M. Early-Life Obesity and Adulthood Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica 2019, 43, e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Hidayat, K.; Yang, C.-M.; Shi, B.-M. Body Fatness at an Early Age and Risk of Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2018, 142, 729–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Christakoudi, S.; Riboli, E.; Evangelou, E.; Tsilidis, K.K. Associations of Body Shape Phenotypes with Sex Steroids and Their Binding Proteins in the UK Biobank Cohort. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 10774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Li, H.; Boakye, D.; Chen, X.; Jansen, L.; Chang-Claude, J.; Hoffmeister, M.; Brenner, H. Associations of Body Mass Index at Different Ages With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2022, 162, 1088–1097.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Odegaard, A.O.; Koh, W.-P.; Yu, M.C.; Yuan, J.-M. Body Mass Index and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Chinese Singaporeans: The Singapore Chinese Health Study. Cancer 2011, 117, 3841–3849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Otani, T.; Iwasaki, M.; Inoue, M. Shoichiro Tsugane for the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study Group Body Mass Index, Body Height, and Subsequent Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Middle-Aged and Elderly Japanese Men and Women: Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study. Cancer Causes Control 2005, 16, 839–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kuriyama, S.; Tsubono, Y.; Hozawa, A.; Shimazu, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Koizumi, Y.; Suzuki, Y.; Ohmori, K.; Nishino, Y.; Tsuji, I. Obesity and Risk of Cancer in Japan. Int. J. Cancer 2005, 113, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Adams, K.F.; Leitzmann, M.F.; Albanes, D.; Kipnis, V.; Mouw, T.; Hollenbeck, A.; Schatzkin, A. Body Mass and Colorectal Cancer Risk in the NIH-AARP Cohort. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 166, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Oxentenko, A.S.; Bardia, A.; Vierkant, R.A.; Wang, A.H.; Anderson, K.E.; Campbell, P.T.; Sellers, T.A.; Folsom, A.R.; Cerhan, J.R.; Limburg, P.J. Body Size and Incident Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Study of Older Women. Cancer Prev. Res. 2010, 3, 1608–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Kasprzak, A. Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) Signaling in Glucose Metabolism in Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Watkins, L.F.; Lewis, L.R.; Levine, A.E. Characterization of the Synergistic Effect of Insulin and Transferrin and the Regulation of Their Receptors on a Human Colon Carcinoma Cell Line. Int. J. Cancer 1990, 45, 372–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Renehan, A.G.; Zwahlen, M.; Minder, C.; O’Dwyer, S.T.; Shalet, S.M.; Egger, M. Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF)-I, IGF Binding Protein-3, and Cancer Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis. Lancet 2004, 363, 1346–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rinaldi, S.; Cleveland, R.; Norat, T.; Biessy, C.; Rohrmann, S.; Linseisen, J.; Boeing, H.; Pischon, T.; Panico, S.; Agnoli, C.; et al. Serum Levels of IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and Colorectal Cancer Risk: Results from the EPIC Cohort, plus a Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 126, 1702–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Renehan, A.G.; Painter, J.E.; Atkin, W.S.; Potten, C.S.; Shalet, S.M.; O’Dwyer, S.T. High-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Serum Insulin-like Growth Factors. Br. J. Surg. 2001, 88, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Castoldi, A.; Naffah de Souza, C.; Câmara, N.O.S.; Moraes-Vieira, P.M. The Macrophage Switch in Obesity Development. Front. Immunol. 2016, 6, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Suganami, T.; Ogawa, Y. Adipose Tissue Macrophages: Their Role in Adipose Tissue Remodeling. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2010, 88, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hao, N.-B.; Lü, M.-H.; Fan, Y.-H.; Cao, Y.-L.; Zhang, Z.-R.; Yang, S.-M. Macrophages in Tumor Microenvironments and the Progression of Tumors. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2012, 2012, 948098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Springer, N.L.; Iyengar, N.M.; Bareja, R.; Verma, A.; Jochelson, M.S.; Giri, D.D.; Zhou, X.K.; Elemento, O.; Dannenberg, A.J.; Fischbach, C. Obesity-Associated Extracellular Matrix Remodeling Promotes a Macrophage Phenotype Similar to Tumor-Associated Macrophages. Am. J. Pathol. 2019, 189, 2019–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Obradovic, M.; Sudar-Milovanovic, E.; Soskic, S.; Essack, M.; Arya, S.; Stewart, A.J.; Gojobori, T.; Isenovic, E.R. Leptin and Obesity: Role and Clinical Implication. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 585887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Izquierdo, A.G.; Crujeiras, A.B.; Casanueva, F.F.; Carreira, M.C. Leptin, Obesity, and Leptin Resistance: Where Are We 25 Years Later? Nutrients 2019, 11, 2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Jaffe, T.; Schwartz, B. Leptin Promotes Motility and Invasiveness in Human Colon Cancer Cells by Activating Multiple Signal-Transduction Pathways. Int. J. Cancer 2008, 123, 2543–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Endo, H.; Hosono, K.; Uchiyama, T.; Sakai, E.; Sugiyama, M.; Takahashi, H.; Nakajima, N.; Wada, K.; Takeda, K.; Nakagama, H.; et al. Leptin Acts as a Growth Factor for Colorectal Tumours at Stages Subsequent to Tumour Initiation in Murine Colon Carcinogenesis. Gut 2011, 60, 1363–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Aparicio, T.; Kotelevets, L.; Tsocas, A.; Laigneau, J.-P.; Sobhani, I.; Chastre, E.; Lehy, T. Leptin Stimulates the Proliferation of Human Colon Cancer Cells in Vitro but Does Not Promote the Growth of Colon Cancer Xenografts in Nude Mice or Intestinal Tumorigenesis in Apc(Min/+) Mice. Gut 2005, 54, 1136–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Parida, S.; Siddharth, S.; Sharma, D. Adiponectin, Obesity, and Cancer: Clash of the Bigwigs in Health and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Kantartzis, K.; Rittig, K.; Balletshofer, B.; Machann, J.; Schick, F.; Porubska, K.; Fritsche, A.; Häring, H.-U.; Stefan, N. The Relationships of Plasma Adiponectin with a Favorable Lipid Profile, Decreased Inflammation, and Less Ectopic Fat Accumulation Depend on Adiposity. Clin. Chem. 2006, 52, 1934–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Fenton, J.I.; Birmingham, J.M.; Hursting, S.D.; Hord, N.G. Adiponectin Blocks Multiple Signaling Cascades Associated with Leptin-Induced Cell Proliferation in ApcMin/+ Colon Epithelial Cells. Int. J. Cancer 2008, 122, 2437–2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Danielsen, S.A.; Eide, P.W.; Nesbakken, A.; Guren, T.; Leithe, E.; Lothe, R.A. Portrait of the PI3K/AKT Pathway in Colorectal Cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1855, 104–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Nguyen, H.T.; Duong, H.-Q. The Molecular Characteristics of Colorectal Cancer: Implications for Diagnosis and Therapy. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 16, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Cani, P.D.; Amar, J.; Iglesias, M.A.; Poggi, M.; Knauf, C.; Bastelica, D.; Neyrinck, A.M.; Fava, F.; Tuohy, K.M.; Chabo, C.; et al. Metabolic Endotoxemia Initiates Obesity and Insulin Resistance. Diabetes 2007, 56, 1761–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Neal, M.D.; Leaphart, C.; Levy, R.; Prince, J.; Billiar, T.R.; Watkins, S.; Li, J.; Cetin, S.; Ford, H.; Schreiber, A.; et al. Enterocyte TLR4 Mediates Phagocytosis and Translocation of Bacteria Across the Intestinal Barrier. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 3070–3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Kuugbee, E.D.; Shang, X.; Gamallat, Y.; Bamba, D.; Awadasseid, A.; Suliman, M.A.; Zang, S.; Ma, Y.; Chiwala, G.; Xin, Y.; et al. Structural Change in Microbiota by a Probiotic Cocktail Enhances the Gut Barrier and Reduces Cancer via TLR2 Signaling in a Rat Model of Colon Cancer. Digest. Dis. Sci. 2016, 61, 2908–2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kang, M.; Edmundson, P.; Araujo-Perez, F.; McCoy, A.N.; Galanko, J.; Keku, T.O. Association of Plasma Endotoxin, Inflammatory Cytokines and Risk of Colorectal Adenomas. BMC Cancer 2013, 13, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Moreno-Navarrete, J.M.; Ortega, F.; Serino, M.; Luche, E.; Waget, A.; Pardo, G.; Salvador, J.; Ricart, W.; Frühbeck, G.; Burcelin, R.; et al. Circulating Lipopolysaccharide-Binding Protein (LBP) as a Marker of Obesity-Related Insulin Resistance. Int. J. Obes. 2012, 36, 1442–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Wilson, A.S.; Koller, K.R.; Ramaboli, M.C.; Nesengani, L.T.; Ocvirk, S.; Chen, C.; Flanagan, C.A.; Sapp, F.R.; Merritt, Z.T.; Bhatti, F.; et al. Diet and the Human Gut Microbiome: An International Review. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2020, 65, 723–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Dos Reis, S.A.; da Conceição, L.L.; Siqueira, N.P.; Rosa, D.D.; da Silva, L.L.; Peluzio, M. Review of the Mechanisms of Probiotic Actions in the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer. Nutr. Res. 2017, 37, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Czajkowska, A.; Szponar, B. Short chain fatty acids (SCFA), the products of gut bacteria metabolism and their role in the host. Postepy Hig. Med. Dosw. 2018, 72, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Nicolucci, A.C.; Hume, M.P.; Martínez, I.; Mayengbam, S.; Walter, J.; Reimer, R.A. Prebiotics Reduce Body Fat and Alter Intestinal Microbiota in Children Who Are Overweight or With Obesity. Gastroenterology 2017, 153, 711–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Zheng, D.-W.; Li, R.-Q.; An, J.-X.; Xie, T.-Q.; Han, Z.-Y.; Xu, R.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, X.-Z. Prebiotics-Encapsulated Probiotic Spores Regulate Gut Microbiota and Suppress Colon Cancer. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2004529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Chen, C.-C.; Lin, W.-C.; Kong, M.-S.; Shi, H.N.; Walker, W.A.; Lin, C.-Y.; Huang, C.-T.; Lin, Y.-C.; Jung, S.-M.; Lin, T.-Y. Oral Inoculation of Probiotics Lactobacillus Acidophilus NCFM Suppresses Tumour Growth Both in Segmental Orthotopic Colon Cancer and Extra-Intestinal Tissue. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 107, 1623–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Gagnière, J. Gut Microbiota Imbalance and Colorectal Cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Greenblum, S.; Turnbaugh, P.J.; Borenstein, E. Metagenomic Systems Biology of the Human Gut Microbiome Reveals Topological Shifts Associated with Obesity and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 594–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Cho, M.; Carter, J.; Harari, S.; Pei, Z. The Interrelationships of the Gut Microbiome and Inflammation in Colorectal Carcinogenesis. Clin. Lab. Med. 2014, 34, 699–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Sanna, S.; van Zuydam, N.R.; Mahajan, A.; Kurilshikov, A.; Vich Vila, A.; Võsa, U.; Mujagic, Z.; Masclee, A.A.M.; Jonkers, D.M.A.E.; Oosting, M.; et al. Causal Relationships among the Gut Microbiome, Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Metabolic Diseases. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 600–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Gutiérrez-Salmerón, M.; Lucena, S.R.; Chocarro-Calvo, A.; García-Martínez, J.M.; Martín Orozco, R.M.; García-Jiménez, C. Metabolic and Hormonal Remodeling of Colorectal Cancer Cell Signalling by Diabetes. Endocr. Rel. Cancer 2021, 28, R191–R206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Pauli, J.R.; Ropelle, E.R.; Cintra, D.E.; Carvalho-Filho, M.A.; Moraes, J.C.; De Souza, C.T.; Velloso, L.A.; Carvalheira, J.B.C.; Saad, M.J.A. Acute Physical Exercise Reverses S -Nitrosation of the Insulin Receptor, Insulin Receptor Substrate 1 and Protein Kinase B/Akt in Diet-Induced Obese Wistar Rats: Acute Exercise/Insulin Resistance. J. Physiol. 2008, 586, 659–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Tremblay, F.; Krebs, M.; Dombrowski, L.; Brehm, A.; Bernroider, E.; Roth, E.; Nowotny, P.; Waldhäusl, W.; Marette, A.; Roden, M. Overactivation of S6 Kinase 1 as a Cause of Human Insulin Resistance During Increased Amino Acid Availability. Diabetes 2005, 54, 2674–2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Neis, E.P.J.G.; Dejong, C.H.C.; Rensen, S.S. The Role of Microbial Amino Acid Metabolism in Host Metabolism. Nutrients 2015, 7, 2930–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Sze Marc, A.; Schloss Patrick, D. Leveraging Existing 16S RRNA Gene Surveys To Identify Reproducible Biomarkers in Individuals with Colorectal Tumors. mBio 2018, 9, e00630-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Castellarin, M.; Warren, R.L.; Freeman, J.D.; Dreolini, L.; Krzywinski, M.; Strauss, J.; Barnes, R.; Watson, P.; Allen-Vercoe, E.; Moore, R.A.; et al. Fusobacterium Nucleatum Infection Is Prevalent in Human Colorectal Carcinoma. Genome Res. 2012, 22, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Li, X.; Huang, J.; Yu, T.; Fang, X.; Lou, L.; Xin, S.; Ji, L.; Jiang, F.; Lou, Y. Fusobacterium Nucleatum Promotes the Progression of Colorectal Cancer Through Cdk5-Activated Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 545251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Huang, X.; Hong, X.; Wang, J.; Sun, T.; Yu, T.; Yu, Y.; Fang, J.; Xiong, H. Metformin Elicits Antitumour Effect by Modulation of the Gut Microbiota and Rescues Fusobacterium Nucleatum-Induced Colorectal Tumourigenesis. EBioMedicine 2020, 61, 103037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Shah, M.S.; DeSantis, T.Z.; Weinmaier, T.; McMurdie, P.J.; Cope, J.L.; Altrichter, A.; Yamal, J.-M.; Hollister, E.B. Leveraging Sequence-Based Faecal Microbial Community Survey Data to Identify a Composite Biomarker for Colorectal Cancer. Gut 2018, 67, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Martin, H.M.; Campbell, B.J.; Hart, C.A.; Mpofu, C.; Nayar, M.; Singh, R.; Englyst, H.; Williams, H.F.; Rhodes, J.M. Enhanced Escherichia Coli Adherence and Invasion in Crohn’s Disease and Colon Cancer 1. Gastroenterology 2004, 127, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Bonnet, M.; Buc, E.; Sauvanet, P.; Darcha, C.; Dubois, D.; Pereira, B.; Déchelotte, P.; Bonnet, R.; Pezet, D.; Darfeuille-Michaud, A. Colonization of the Human Gut by E. coli and Colorectal Cancer Risk. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 859–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Goldin, B.R.; Gorbach, S.L. The Relationship Between Diet and Rat Fecal Bacterial Enzymes Implicated in Colon Cancer23. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1976, 57, 371–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Gamallat, Y.; Meyiah, A.; Kuugbee, E.D.; Hago, A.M.; Chiwala, G.; Awadasseid, A.; Bamba, D.; Zhang, X.; Shang, X.; Luo, F.; et al. Lactobacillus Rhamnosus Induced Epithelial Cell Apoptosis, Ameliorates Inflammation and Prevents Colon Cancer Development in an Animal Model. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2016, 83, 536–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Verma, A.; Shukla, G. Probiotics Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG, Lactobacillus Acidophilus Suppresses DMH-Induced Procarcinogenic Fecal Enzymes and Preneoplastic Aberrant Crypt Foci in Early Colon Carcinogenesis in Sprague Dawley Rats. Nutr. Cancer 2013, 65, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ewaschuk, J.B.; Walker, J.W.; Diaz, H.; Madsen, K.L. Bioproduction of Conjugated Linoleic Acid by Probiotic Bacteria Occurs In Vitro and In Vivo in Mice. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 1483–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Liu, Z.; Qin, H.; Yang, Z.; Xia, Y.; Liu, W.; Yang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Y.; et al. Randomised Clinical Trial: The Effects of Perioperative Probiotic Treatment on Barrier Function and Post-Operative Infectious Complications in Colorectal Cancer Surgery—A Double-Blind Study. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011, 33, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Yang, J.; Yu, J. The Association of Diet, Gut Microbiota and Colorectal Cancer: What We Eat May Imply What We Get. Protein Cell 2018, 9, 474–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Song, M.; Chan, A.T. Environmental Factors, Gut Microbiota, and Colorectal Cancer Prevention. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 17, 275–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Mehta, R.S.; Song, M.; Nishihara, R.; Drew, D.A.; Wu, K.; Qian, Z.R.; Fung, T.T.; Hamada, T.; Masugi, Y.; da Silva, A.; et al. Dietary Patterns and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: Analysis by Tumor Location and Molecular Subtypes. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 1944–1953.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Bultman, S.J. Interplay between Diet, Gut Microbiota, Epigenetic Events, and Colorectal Cancer. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61, 1500902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Shivappa, N.; Godos, J.; Hébert, J.R.; Wirth, M.D.; Piuri, G.; Speciani, A.F.; Grosso, G. Dietary Inflammatory Index and Colorectal Cancer Risk-A Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Fan, Y.; Jin, X.; Man, C.; Gao, Z.; Wang, X. Meta-Analysis of the Association between the Inflammatory Potential of Diet and Colorectal Cancer Risk. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 59592–59600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Norat, T.; Bingham, S.; Ferrari, P.; Slimani, N.; Jenab, M.; Mazuir, M.; Overvad, K.; Olsen, A.; Tjønneland, A.; Clavel, F.; et al. Meat, Fish, and Colorectal Cancer Risk: The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2005, 97, 906–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Parr, C.L.; Hjartåker, A.; Lund, E.; Veierød, M.B. Meat Intake, Cooking Methods and Risk of Proximal Colon, Distal Colon and Rectal Cancer: The Norwegian Women and Cancer (NOWAC) Cohort Study. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 133, 1153–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Song, M.; Garrett, W.S.; Chan, A.T. Nutrients, Foods, and Colorectal Cancer Prevention. Gastroenterology 2015, 148, 1244–1260.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Wang, Y.; Nguyen, L.H.; Mehta, R.S.; Song, M.; Huttenhower, C.; Chan, A.T. Association Between the Sulfur Microbial Diet and Risk of Colorectal Cancer. JAMA Netw. Open 2021, 4, e2134308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Nguyen, L.H.; Ma, W.; Wang, D.D.; Cao, Y.; Mallick, H.; Gerbaba, T.K.; Lloyd-Price, J.; Abu-Ali, G.; Hall, A.B.; Sikavi, D.; et al. Association Between Sulfur-Metabolizing Bacterial Communities in Stool and Risk of Distal Colorectal Cancer in Men. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 1313–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Choi, Y.-J.; Myung, S.-K.; Lee, J.-H. Light Alcohol Drinking and Risk of Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. Cancer Res. Treat. 2018, 50, 474–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Cai, S.; Li, Y.; Ding, Y.; Chen, K.; Jin, M. Alcohol Drinking and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer Death: A Meta-Analysis. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 2014, 23, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Mahmod, A.I.; Haif, S.K.; Kamal, A.; Al-ataby, I.A.; Talib, W.H. Chemoprevention Effect of the Mediterranean Diet on Colorectal Cancer: Current Studies and Future Prospects. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 924192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Castelló, A.; Rodríguez-Barranco, M.; Fernández de Larrea, N.; Jakszyn, P.; Dorronsoro, A.; Amiano, P.; Chirlaque, M.-D.; Colorado-Yohar, S.; Guevara, M.; Moreno-Iribas, C.; et al. Adherence to the Western, Prudent and Mediterranean Dietary Patterns and Colorectal Cancer Risk: Findings from the Spanish Cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Spain). Nutrients 2022, 14, 3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Acevedo-León, D.; Gómez-Abril, S.Á.; Monzó-Beltrán, L.; Estañ-Capell, N.; Arroyo-Montañés, R.; Bañuls, C.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Sáez, G. Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet Has a Protective Role against Metabolic and DNA Damage Markers in Colorectal Cancer Patients. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Agnoli, C.; Grioni, S.; Sieri, S.; Palli, D.; Masala, G.; Sacerdote, C.; Vineis, P.; Tumino, R.; Giurdanella, M.C.; Pala, V.; et al. Italian Mediterranean Index and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in the Italian Section of the EPIC Cohort. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 132, 1404–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Vieira, A.R.; Abar, L.; Chan, D.S.M.; Vingeliene, S.; Polemiti, E.; Stevens, C.; Greenwood, D.; Norat, T. Foods and Beverages and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies, an Update of the Evidence of the WCRF-AICR Continuous Update Project. Ann. Oncol. 2017, 28, 1788–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Flood, A.; Rastogi, T.; Wirfält, E.; Mitrou, P.N.; Reedy, J.; Subar, A.F.; Kipnis, V.; Mouw, T.; Hollenbeck, A.R.; Leitzmann, M.; et al. Dietary Patterns as Identified by Factor Analysis and Colorectal Cancer among Middle-Aged Americans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 88, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Sain, A.; Sahu, S.; Naskar, D. Potential of Olive Oil and Its Phenolic Compounds as Therapeutic Intervention against Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Br J. Nutr. 2021, 128, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Itsiopoulos, C.; Mayr, H.L.; Thomas, C.J. The Anti-Inflammatory Effects of a Mediterranean Diet: A Review. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2022, 25, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Ubago-Guisado, E.; Rodríguez-Barranco, M.; Ching-López, A.; Petrova, D.; Molina-Montes, E.; Amiano, P.; Barricarte-Gurrea, A.; Chirlaque, M.-D.; Agudo, A.; Sánchez, M.-J. Evidence Update on the Relationship between Diet and the Most Common Cancers from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Wu, B.; Zhou, R.-L.; Ou, Q.-J.; Chen, Y.-M.; Fang, Y.-J.; Zhang, C.-X. Association of Plant-Based Dietary Patterns with the Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Large-Scale Case-Control Study. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 10790–10801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Webb, R.J.; Mazidi, M.; Lip, G.Y.H.; Kengne, A.P.; Banach, M.; Davies, I.G. The Role of Adiposity, Diet and Inflammation on the Discordance between LDL-C and Apolipoprotein B. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2022, 32, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Milesi, G.; Rangan, A.; Grafenauer, S. Whole Grain Consumption and Inflammatory Markers: A Systematic Literature Review of Randomized Control Trials. Nutrients 2022, 14, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Harland, J.I.; Garton, L.E. Whole-Grain Intake as a Marker of Healthy Body Weight and Adiposity. Public Health Nutr. 2008, 11, 554–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Illikoud, N.; Mantel, M.; Rolli-Derkinderen, M.; Gagnaire, V.; Jan, G. Dairy Starters and Fermented Dairy Products Modulate Gut Mucosal Immunity. Immunol. Lett. 2022, 251–252, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Khorraminezhad, L.; Rudkowska, I. Modulation of Gene Expression Profile Following Consumption of High-Dairy Products in Subjects with Hyperinsulinemia. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2022, 33, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Kim, S.H.; Moon, J.Y.; Lim, Y.J. Dietary Intervention for Preventing Colorectal Cancer: A Practical Guide for Physicians. J. Cancer Prev. 2022, 27, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Zhang, K.; Luo, Y.; Dai, H.; Deng, Z. Effects of Bariatric Surgery on Cancer Risk: Evidence from Meta-Analysis. Obes. Surg. 2020, 30, 1265–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Roslan, N.H.; Makpol, S.; Yusof, Y.A.M. A Review on Dietary Intervention in Obesity Associated Colon Cancer. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2019, 20, 1309–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. O’Keefe, S.J.D.; Li, J.V.; Lahti, L.; Ou, J.; Carbonero, F.; Mohammed, K.; Posma, J.M.; Kinross, J.; Wahl, E.; Ruder, E.; et al. Fat, Fiber and Cancer Risk in African Americans and Rural Africans. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Orange, S.T.; Jordan, A.R.; Odell, A.; Kavanagh, O.; Hicks, K.M.; Eaglen, T.; Todryk, S.; Saxton, J.M. Acute Aerobic Exercise-Conditioned Serum Reduces Colon Cancer Cell Proliferation in Vitro through Interleukin-6-Induced Regulation of DNA Damage. Int. J. Cancer 2022, 151, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Schoenberg, M.H. Physical Activity and Nutrition in Primary and Tertiary Prevention of Colorectal Cancer. Visc. Med. 2016, 32, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  150. McTiernan, A. Mechanisms Linking Physical Activity with Cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2008, 8, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Friedenreich, C.M.; Ryder-Burbidge, C.; McNeil, J. Physical Activity, Obesity and Sedentary Behavior in Cancer Etiology: Epidemiologic Evidence and Biologic Mechanisms. Mol. Oncol. 2021, 15, 790–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Katzmarzyk, P.T.; Powell, K.E.; Jakicic, J.M.; Troiano, R.P.; Piercy, K.; Tennant, B. Sedentary Behavior and Health: Update from the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2019, 51, 1227–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 12 02451 g001 550
Figure 1. Obesity-related factors and CRC risk.
Figure 1. Obesity-related factors and CRC risk.
Jcm 12 02451 g001
Jcm 12 02451 g002 550
Figure 2. Summarized approaches focused on obesity-related factors increasing the risk of CRC.
Figure 2. Summarized approaches focused on obesity-related factors increasing the risk of CRC.
Jcm 12 02451 g002
Table
Table 1. Obesity prevalence among CRC cases and its relation with chosen CRC outcome.
Table 1. Obesity prevalence among CRC cases and its relation with chosen CRC outcome.
Population
(n, Total)		YearsCRC Cases, nIndividuals with Obesity and
CRC *, %		Individuals with
Obesity *, n		CRC Risk
OR/RR/HZ (CI)		Ref.
Australia, men (16,556)1990–199415333.3351
(BMI > 29.2)		CRC risk
RR = 2.1 (1.3–3.7)
4th vs. 1st quartiles of WHR		[56]
United Kingdom
(40,467)		2006–2010191828.94555n/a[59]
Germany
(14,552)		2003–202074716.2121
(10 years before diagnosis)		CRC risk
OR = 2.17
(1.54–3.07)		[60]
Singapur
(51,251)		1993–199898011.63114
(BMI > 27.5)		CRC risk
HR = 1.25
(1.01–1.55)
Colon cancer
HR = 1.48
(1.13–1.92)
Rectal cancer
HR = 0.93
(0.64–1.36)		[61]
Japan, men
Cohort I
(16,765)
Cohort II
(28,945)		1990–2001--420
616		CRC risk
RR = 1.5 (0.7–3.0)
RR = 1.5 (0.6–3.03)		[62]
Japan, women
Cohort I
(21,725)
Cohort II
(32,066)		1990–2001--700
1009		CRC risk
RR = 0.7 (0.3–2.0)
RR = 0.8 (0.3–2.0)		[62]
Japan,
women
(15,054)		1984–19921157.8%9CRC risk
RR = 2.06
(1.03–4.13)		[63]
The USA
(517,144)		1995–2000334325.04837Colon cancer risk M/W
BMI 30–32.5
M, RR = 1.53
(1.23–1.9)
W, RR =1.28
(0.97–1.69)
BMI ≥ 40
M, RR = 2.39
(1.59–3.58)/
W, RR = 1.49 (0.98 = 2.25)		[64]
The USA
(36,941)		1986–2005146427.46402CRC risk
RR = 1.56
(1.10–2.22)		[65]
* BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. CRC—colorectal cancer; OR—odds ratio; RR—relative risk; HZ—hazard-ratio; unless otherwise stated. M—men; W—women; n/a—not applicable; OR—odds ratio; RR—relative risk; HR—hazard ratio; CI—confidence interval.
Table
Table 2. Foods and dietary patterns increasing or decreasing the risk of colorectal cancer (dietary patterns are characterized in the text).
Table 2. Foods and dietary patterns increasing or decreasing the risk of colorectal cancer (dietary patterns are characterized in the text).
Foods and Dietary Patterns Increasing the Risk of Colorectal CancerFoods and Dietary Patterns Decreasing the Risk of Colorectal Cancer
Western diet [118]
Sulfur microbial diet [125,126]
Proinflammatory diet [120,121]
Red and processed meat [122,123]
Refined grains [147]
Alcohol [127]		Mediterranean diet [130,137]
Fruits and vegetables [132,134]
Fiber [41,132]
Phenolic of olive oils [135]
Fish [133]
Vitamin D [137]
Whole grains [41].
Dairy products [41,133]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rychter, A.M.; Łykowska-Szuber, L.; Zawada, A.; Szymczak-Tomczak, A.; Ratajczak, A.E.; Skoracka, K.; Kolan, M.; Dobrowolska, A.; Krela-Kaźmierczak, I. Why Does Obesity as an Inflammatory Condition Predispose to Colorectal Cancer? J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2451. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072451

AMA Style

Rychter AM, Łykowska-Szuber L, Zawada A, Szymczak-Tomczak A, Ratajczak AE, Skoracka K, Kolan M, Dobrowolska A, Krela-Kaźmierczak I. Why Does Obesity as an Inflammatory Condition Predispose to Colorectal Cancer? Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(7):2451. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072451

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rychter, Anna Maria, Liliana Łykowska-Szuber, Agnieszka Zawada, Aleksandra Szymczak-Tomczak, Alicja Ewa Ratajczak, Kinga Skoracka, Michalina Kolan, Agnieszka Dobrowolska, and Iwona Krela-Kaźmierczak. 2023. "Why Does Obesity as an Inflammatory Condition Predispose to Colorectal Cancer?" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 7: 2451. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072451

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop