Next Article in Journal
Real-Life Clinical Outcomes of Benralizumab Treatment in Patients with Uncontrolled Severe Asthma and Coexisting Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Morbidity and Mortality Outcomes between Hybrid Palliation and Norwood Palliation Procedures for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Diagnostic Errors in Obstetric Morbidity and Mortality: Methods for and Challenges in Seeking Diagnostic Excellence

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vagelos College of Physicians, Columbia University, New York, NY 10023, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(14), 4245; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144245 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 26 June 2024 / Revised: 14 July 2024 / Accepted: 16 July 2024 / Published: 20 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in Patient Safety and Quality in Maternal–Fetal Medicine)

Abstract

Pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality remain high across the United States, with the majority of deaths being deemed preventable. Misdiagnosis and delay in diagnosis are thought to be significant contributors to preventable harm. These diagnostic errors in obstetrics are understudied. Presented here are five selected research methods to ascertain the rates of and harm associated with diagnostic errors and the pros and cons of each. These methodologies include clinicopathologic autopsy studies, retrospective chart reviews based on clinical criteria, obstetric simulations, pregnancy-related harm case reviews, and malpractice and administrative claim database research. We then present a framework for a future study of diagnostic errors and the pursuit of diagnostic excellence in obstetrics: (1) defining and capturing diagnostic errors, (2) targeting bias in diagnostic processes, (3) implementing and monitoring safety bundles, (4) leveraging electronic health record triggers for case reviews, (5) improving diagnostic skills via simulation training, and (6) publishing error rates and reduction strategies. Evaluation of the effectiveness of this framework to ascertain diagnostic error rates, as well as its impact on patient outcomes, is required.
Keywords: diagnostic errors; obstetrics; maternal morbidity; maternal mortality diagnostic errors; obstetrics; maternal morbidity; maternal mortality

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Krenitsky, N.M.; Perez-Urbano, I.; Goffman, D. Diagnostic Errors in Obstetric Morbidity and Mortality: Methods for and Challenges in Seeking Diagnostic Excellence. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 4245. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144245

AMA Style

Krenitsky NM, Perez-Urbano I, Goffman D. Diagnostic Errors in Obstetric Morbidity and Mortality: Methods for and Challenges in Seeking Diagnostic Excellence. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(14):4245. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144245

Chicago/Turabian Style

Krenitsky, Nicole M., India Perez-Urbano, and Dena Goffman. 2024. "Diagnostic Errors in Obstetric Morbidity and Mortality: Methods for and Challenges in Seeking Diagnostic Excellence" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 14: 4245. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144245

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop