Next Article in Journal
Pediatric Perspectives on Liver Cirrhosis: Unravelling Clinical Patterns and Therapeutic Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
Beyond Stress Ischemia: Unveiling the Multifaceted Nature of Coronary Vulnerable Plaques Using Cardiac Computed Tomography
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Morbidity in Patients with Urolithiasis: An Epidemiological Approach Based on Hospitalization Burden Data from 1997 to 2021
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Comparative Approaches in Treating Double-J Stent Syndrome: Monotherapy or Combination Therapy?

by
Cătălin Pricop
1,2,
Carina Alexandra Bandac
2,*,
Marius Ivanuță
1,2,*,
Daniel Rădăvoi
3,4,
Viorel Jinga
3,4 and
Dragoş Puia
1,2
1
“Grigore T Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
2
Department of Urology, “Dr. C.I. Parhon” Clinical Hospital, 700503 Iasi, Romania
3
Department of Urology, “Theodor Burghele” Clinical Hospital, 050653 Bucharest, Romania
4
“Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050653 Bucharest, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(14), 4278; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144278 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 17 June 2024 / Revised: 8 July 2024 / Accepted: 18 July 2024 / Published: 22 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Kidney Stones: Current Scenario and Future Perspectives)

Abstract

Introduction: The application of double-J ureteral stents in urology is widespread, but their use is often accompanied by complications and bothersome symptoms, affecting patients’ quality of life (QoL). While various medications have been tested for alleviating the symptoms associated with double-J stents, consensus on their effectiveness remains elusive. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of tamsulosin, solifenacin, mirabegron, desloratadine, and combination therapy using a Romanian-adapted version of the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ). Materials and Methods: A prospective, observational, randomised trial was conducted at the Urology and Renal Transplant Clinic of Dr. “C.I. Parhon” Clinical Hospital in Iasi between 1 January 2022 and 1 August 2023. Three hundred twenty seven patients who underwent their first double-J stent insertion were evaluated with the Romanian-adapted USSQ at baseline and 30 days post-insertion. Patients were randomly divided into six groups based on the prescribed medications: control, tamsulosin, mirabegron, solifenacin, desloratadine, and combination therapy. Results: The data suggest a significant reduction in symptoms in patients who received medication compared with the control group. Furthermore, the combined medication of solifenacin 10 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg was particularly effective in reducing pain with statistical significance compared to the control group (p = 0.001). The highest mean scores for urinary symptom severity were observed in the control group (12.37 ± 6.82), and the lowest was in the mirabegron group (9.94 ± 5.82). The individuals who received a daily dose of 50 mg of mirabegron saw the most notable influence on their job. Conclusions: While no single medication emerged as a “miracle drug” for managing symptoms related to double-J stent insertion, the combination therapy of solifenacin and tamsulosin is the most promising option for improving symptoms related to double-J stent insertion and QoL. Additional extensive research is required to validate these initial results.
Keywords: ureteral stent-related symptoms; tamsulosin; solifenacin; mirabegron; desloratadine ureteral stent-related symptoms; tamsulosin; solifenacin; mirabegron; desloratadine

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pricop, C.; Bandac, C.A.; Ivanuță, M.; Rădăvoi, D.; Jinga, V.; Puia, D. Comparative Approaches in Treating Double-J Stent Syndrome: Monotherapy or Combination Therapy? J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 4278. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144278

AMA Style

Pricop C, Bandac CA, Ivanuță M, Rădăvoi D, Jinga V, Puia D. Comparative Approaches in Treating Double-J Stent Syndrome: Monotherapy or Combination Therapy? Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(14):4278. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144278

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pricop, Cătălin, Carina Alexandra Bandac, Marius Ivanuță, Daniel Rădăvoi, Viorel Jinga, and Dragoş Puia. 2024. "Comparative Approaches in Treating Double-J Stent Syndrome: Monotherapy or Combination Therapy?" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 14: 4278. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144278

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop