Next Article in Journal
From ECG to Imaging: Challenges in the Diagnosis of Adult Congenital Heart Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Lack of Association between Cervical Spine Injuries and Prehospital Immobilization: From Tradition to Evidence
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Drug-Related Glomerular Phenotypes: A Global Pharmacovigilance Perspective

1
School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Algarve University (UAlg), 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
2
Algarve Biomedical Centre (ABC), 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
3
Health & Technology Research Center, Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1990-096 Lisboa, Portugal
4
School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(16), 4869; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164869
Submission received: 26 July 2024 / Revised: 14 August 2024 / Accepted: 16 August 2024 / Published: 18 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology & Urology)

Abstract

:
Introduction: Adverse drug reactions are a significant problem in modern society, stemming from the increase in prescribed medications, over-the-counter drugs, and overall polypharmacy. Glomerular disorders are one of the frequently reported renal conditions associated with medication use. VigiBase is a significant tool for evaluating events associated with drug use, and, to the authors’ knowledge, no study has yet assessed this database to identify the primary medications associated with glomerular disorders. Materials and Methods: We collected data from VigiBase for 54 years and evaluated data based on global frequencies, disproportionality (IC025 values), nephrotoxic potential, and physiopathological mechanisms. Results: Over the evaluation period, 33.932.051 spontaneous notifications of adverse drug reactions reported in VigiBase were assessed, from which 106.775 notifications of drug-associated glomerular disorders were extracted. The isolated medications were classified as ‘potential nephrotoxins’ (47.0%), with 40% of the medications lacking scientific references to report any association with the development of glomerular disorders. Among the evaluated medications, Inotersen (IC025 of 8.3), Penicillamine (IC025 6.8), Bevacizumab (IC025 5.9) and Lenvatinib (IC025 5.4) were identified as having the strongest association with these glomerular disorders. For medications classified as ‘non-nephrotoxic’, a high disproportionality index was observed, suggesting drugs that might be considered as new potential nephrotoxins. Conclusions: Drug-induced glomerular disorders were significantly associated with medications that had no established nephrotoxic role but demonstrated a high disproportionality index in VigiBase. These newly alleged nephrotoxic drugs warrant further evaluation in dedicated studies to assess their true nephrotoxic potential.

1. Introduction

The ability to prescribe medication is a cornerstone of modern medicine, requiring a careful balance between therapeutic benefits and the potential adverse effects arising from drug use [1]. Drug-induced renal diseases are notably prevalent, prompting Mehta et al. to delineate four principal phenotypes of renal manifestations attributable to pharmacological interventions [2].
Among these, various forms of glomerular diseases are increasingly observed as complications of several medications [3]. While the explicit role of drugs in the pathogenesis of glomerular injury is not fully elucidated, their impact is likely substantial [4]. Medications affect various cellular components of the glomerulus, including visceral epithelial cells (podocytes), endothelial cells, and mesangial cells [5]. A variety of pharmaceuticals, such as interferon, bisphosphonates, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiplatelet agents, chemotherapeutic agents, and antiangiogenic drugs, have been implicated in iatrogenic glomerular injury [5].
Pharmacovigilance remains an indispensable tool in the detection, evaluation, understanding, and prevention of adverse drug effects, with active monitoring and reporting of adverse drug reactions being paramount [6].
This study leverages spontaneous notifications from one of the largest global databases of adverse drug reactions to elucidate the drugs most frequently associated with glomerular disorders—VigiBase.
VigiBase was created in 1968 as a result of the thalidomide crisis [7] and serves as a repository of spontaneous notifications regarding adverse drug reactions. It is integrated into the WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring (WHO PIDM). VigiBase serves its primary users, namely national pharmacovigilance centers and the Uppsala Monitoring Centre, by providing essential information on adverse drug reactions. This role makes VigiBase a vital hub in pharmacovigilance, allowing the generation of new hypotheses regarding drug-related issues and enhancing knowledge about specific characteristics of adverse drug reactions, such as time to onset, progression, associated clinical features, and outcomes. The importance of VigiBase in the core of pharmacovigilance is further highlighted by the fact that it is the largest global source of patient safety data [8].
The data in VigiBase come from the migration of spontaneous adverse reaction reports submitted to each national pharmacovigilance center, which are then migrated to VigiBase. Currently, more than 140 countries contribute to this process. Each notification is evaluated by pharmacists and medical experts who assess the information contained in each report, establishing a potential causal link between the reported manifestation and the suspected drug(s) [9].
We aim to highlight these drugs by their frequency of association, the strength of this association with glomerular disorders, and their recognized nephrotoxic potential, as corroborated by scientific references. This endeavor seeks to contribute foundational data to the broader understanding of drug-associated glomerular disturbances.

2. Materials and Methods

We conducted a descriptive analysis of the world’s largest database for adverse drug reaction notifications, VigiBase, following approval from the review board. This comprehensive database aggregates spontaneous reports from a wide array of participating countries, maintaining complete anonymity of data. The dataset spans from 1968 to 2022. Rigorous measures were employed to exclude any duplicate notifications, with each report assigned a unique identification number for precise referencing. The notifications offer extensive details, including anonymized patient information, notifier details, the severity of the adverse reaction, the implicated medication, and a detailed description of the reaction.
Data collection involved filtering notifications using appropriate MedDRA terms (see Supplementary Materials). Each medication was identified by its active ingredient according to WHODrug nomenclature standards and categorized into pharmacological classes based on the WHO’s Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. This facilitated a systematic analysis in relation to specific pharmacological categories.
For this study, we employed the World Health Organization’s IC025 index to identify medications with a disproportionate number of notifications. The IC compares the observed frequency of a specific adverse reaction associated with a medication against its expected frequency in the general population. A positive IC suggests that the adverse reaction is reported more frequently than expected, indicating a potential association. By automatically adjusting for expected frequencies, the IC minimizes random variations and reduces the likelihood of false positives caused by statistical fluctuations, thus only emphasizing statistically significant associations. The IC filters out irrelevant data, distinguishing and disregarding chance associations to reduce false positives. The IC025, representing the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the IC, provides a measure of certainty that an observed medication-adverse reaction association is not occurring by chance. The IC025 is already integrated into VigiBase, and the data was extracted directly from it.
Also, each drug was evaluated in 5 different bibliographic sources regarding its role in the formation of kidney stones (two databases [10,11], one website [12], and two reference books [13,14]). A bibliographic score (BS) was developed and considered a surrogate for each drug’s lithogenic role (0—not lithogenic; 1–2—potentially lithogenic; and 3–5—lithogenic). For each medication, we counted the number of references mentioning the phenotype as an adverse effect of the drug. The score assigned to each medication corresponded to the total number of sources referencing the adverse event. For example, if a medication had 2 sources mentioning the adverse event, then the BS for that medication would be 2.
With this score in mind, the main medications involved and reported in the obtained notifications were evaluated regarding the pathophysiology of their nephrotoxicity, whenever available.

3. Results

Between 1968 and 2022, VigiBase recorded a total of 33,932,051 spontaneous notifications of adverse drug reactions. Of these, 106,775 notifications pertained to drug-associated glomerular disorders, constituting 0.32% of all reports during the analyzed period. These notifications predominantly involved male consumers (52.9% for males; 42.2% for females; 4.9% of notifications did not report the sex) and individuals aged 45–64 years (22.8%), with this sample presenting a mean age of 48.5 ± 7.42 years. The USA was the main reporter (47.5%), followed by Italy (6.0%) and Germany (5.5%), and the notifications were reported by physicians (36.5%), consumers (23.5%), and other healthcare professionals (11.3%).
Hematuria emerged as the most frequently reported glomerular disturbances, documented in 52.5% of the cases, followed by proteinuria reported in 13.3%, with this presenting as nephrotic syndrome in 6.5% of the notifications. Pyrexia was the most common accompanying complaint, present in 6.3% of the notifications, followed by fatigue (5.8%) and nausea (4.7%) (see Table 1).
Among the main drugs assessed, the number of drugs classified as potential new nephrotoxins (BS 0) was very similar to those classified as potential nephrotoxins (BS 1–2) (39.1% for new nephrotoxins and 47.8% for potential nephrotoxins). In fact, only 13.1% of the main drugs evaluated were considered known nephrotoxins based on the bibliographic score (BS 3–5) (see Table 2).
From an absolute perspective, Rivaroxaban, the COVID-19 vaccine (77.6% Tozinameran; 14.6% Elasomeran; 5.4% ChAdOx1 nCoV-19; 2.4% others), Warfarin, and Acetylsalicylic Acid were described in 7.5%, 7.1%, 5.4%, and 5.2% of the notifications, respectively (see Table S2 of Supplementary Materials). This distribution explains why the ATC class B was the most frequently reported (29.6%), followed by ATC class L (25.1%), and ATC class J (20.9%) (see Table S1 of Supplementary Materials).
Apart from the COVID-19 vaccine, which only had an IC025 of 1.9 for proteinuria, the others showed values indicative of a significant association with glomerular disorders, as seen with Rivaroxaban (IC025 of 4.5 for Hematuria), Acetylsalicylic Acid (IC025 of 3.9 for Hematuria), and Warfarin (IC025 of 4.6 for Hematuria). Besides these, we observed the presence of other drugs which, although not as frequently reported, show a significant association with glomerular disorders, such as Inotersen (IC025 of 8.3 for increased urine protein/creatinine ratio), Penicillamine (IC025 of 6.8 for nephrotic syndrome), Bevacizumab (IC025 of 5.9 for proteinuria), and Lenvatinib (IC025 of 5.4 for proteinuria), among others (see Table S3 of Supplementary Materials).
Among the main drugs evaluated, we identified Lansoprazole, Heparin, Acetylsalicylic Acid, and Tenofovir as lacking bibliographic references according to our score, suggesting they may be potential new nephrotoxins related to glomerular disorders.
For the medications evaluated, an increasing average IC025 was observed as we transitioned from ‘non-nephrotoxic’ (average IC025 of 3.03) to ‘potentially nephrotoxic’ (average IC025 of 3.66) and then to those categorized as nephrotoxic (average IC025 of 3.87).

4. Discussion

Our study evaluated VigiBase, one of the largest databases of spontaneous notifications of adverse drug reactions, over a period of 54 years. The aim was to identify, qualify, and compare the principal medications associated with the development of glomerular disorders with bibliographic references, supplemented by the pathophysiological principles considered for such an association.
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the first studies to utilize such a database for evaluating drug-associated glomerular disturbances. The small proportion of isolated notifications (0.32%) reflects the challenges in identifying this type of renal alteration or in associating them with drug use.
To achieve the outlined objectives, the authors conducted a descriptive evaluation of filtered data from VigiBase, and utilized an integrated disproportionality index (IC025), which enabled the assessment of the ‘strength’ of the association between drug and disorder. Additionally, a bibliographic score was developed to determine the documented nephrotoxic potential of each principal medication. This approach not only facilitated the identification of already known nephrotoxins but also underscored the nephrotoxic roles of certain drugs (high IC025; high BS) and pinpointed potential new nephrotoxins (high IC025; low BS).
The data obtained indicate that individuals aged between 45–64 years were the most frequently reported in notifications of drug-induced glomerular diseases, with the male sex also being predominant. This is in line with data obtained from the literature [15,16].
In relation to renal manifestations associated with medication use and expressed in VigiBase spontaneous notifications, ‘PT Hematuria’ or ‘Presence of blood in urine’ were the most frequently reported, with respective frequencies of 52.5% and 17.4% in the notifications obtained. This finding must be interpreted cautiously, as the clinical manifestation of hematuria may not necessarily reflect an adverse drug reaction (ADR), but rather a side effect of the medication. Indeed, the presence of 7 anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet agents within the top 10 could contribute to this manifestation (non-glomerular diseases-related hematuria). Literature reports an incidence of hematuria associated with anticoagulant use at 26.7%, decreasing to 1.1% in thrombotic event prophylaxis, with antiplatelet agents being 76 times less likely to cause hematuria compared to anticoagulants [17].
However, among the top 10 drugs dominated by anticoagulants (refer to Table S2 in the Supplementary Materials), three medications outside the ATC B class are noteworthy: the COVID-19 vaccine (7.1%), Bevacizumab (2.9%), and Adalimumab (1.3%). These drugs are associated with the development of proteinuria, thrombotic microangiopathy, or IgA nephropathy.
We demonstrated that the main drugs evaluated exhibited a significantly elevated average IC025 of 3.44, suggesting already a strong preferential association with glomerular disorders compared to other adverse reactions.
Examining the ATC classes, the three most involved ATC drug classes—ATC classes B, L, and J—showed average IC025 values of 4.2, 3.0, and 1.87, respectively, illustrating a stronger linkage to glomerular disorders in classes B and L, and a somehow lower association with class J drugs.
Among the principal medications identified, Inotersen (IC025 of 8.3), Penicillamine (IC025 of 6.8), Bevacizumab (IC025 of 5.9), and Lenvatinib (IC025 of 5.4) stand out, all of which are strongly associated with the development of proteinuria.
Notably, the association between drugs and glomerular disturbances is distinctly evident in 39.1% of the drugs that exhibit a high association with these disorders (IC025 3.03) but are not supported by any of the evaluated bibliographic sources (BS = 0), potentially identifying these drugs as new nephrotoxins.
Among these top medications whose bibliographic scores were evaluated and are potential new nephrotoxins, we highlight Lansoprazole (IC025 4.4), Omeprazole (IC025 3.1), Tenofovir (IC025 2.8), and Adalimumab (IC025 1.9). Lansoprazole has been associated with the development of interstitial nephritis [18] and, consequently, acute kidney injury [19], but the literature does not directly associate it with the development of proteinuria. In this case, proteinuria may be associated, in the initial phase, with tubular proteinuria associated with the development of interstitial nephritis [20,21]. The mechanism associated with the development of interstitial nephritis and, thus, proteinuria from Lansoprazole, like other drugs, involves drug binding to the tubular basement membrane (TBM), acting as a hapten or mimicking an antigen normally present in the TBM or interstitium, inducing an immune response [22]. Regarding Tenofovir, although our score suggested it as a potential new nephrotoxin, further targeted investigation revealed that proteinuria has been observed in 27% of patients treated with Tenofovir [23], with each year of use associated with a 34% increased risk of developing proteinuria [24,25]. This proteinuria, again tubular in origin, results from direct toxicity of Tenofovir at this level, mainly in the proximal tubule, although the mechanism is not fully elucidated, it may result from mitochondrial dysfunction [26]. Finally, among medications with a BS of 0 and an increasing association with proteinuria, we also highlight Adalimumab, a drug, in our sample, linked to the development of IgA Nephropathy [27,28]. In fact, this association still seems weak, both because the IC025 is only 1.9 and because the few references found are related to isolated clinical cases.
Changing to the hematuria phenotype and focusing now on medications with a BS of 0–all from the ATC B class, we highlight acetylsalicylic acid with an IC025 of 3.9. This medication, despite being a platelet function inhibitor, is not associated with an increase in microscopic hematuria depending on its use [29], so hematuria associated with aspirin should result from different mechanisms. These conclusions are contradicted by other authors who demonstrate a significant increase in complications associated with hematuria [30]. This association has also been described in population studies, with aspirin being associated with the development of hematuria in 24.54% of elderly consumers [31]. Indeed, in a case series evaluation, urothelial disorders were one of the main causes associated with aspirin use, namely tumor conditions or hemorrhagic cystitis [32], and, therefore, hematuria concurrent with an antiplatelet agent should always prompt an appropriate investigation for hematuria. Enoxaparin, a well-known anticoagulant, despite the high predicted association with hematuria (IC025 4.2), sees this association as poorly described, even with a more in-depth analysis. In fact, the American Urological Association, in its guidelines on hematuria, considers the evidence strength for this statement as Grade C [33].
Focusing on medications with a higher degree of association with glomerular disorders, we highlight Inotersen (IC025 of 8.3) for an increase in the protein/creatinine ratio, one of the highest in the entire VigiBase. For this drug, the BS was 2, suggesting its potential nephrotoxicity, with literature references indicating reversible development of proteinuria [34], and associations with segmental and focal glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) [35], although FSGS has been showed in only 3% of patients receiving this drug [34]. Proteinuria associated with antisense oligonucleotides may also result from their tubular accumulation affecting protein tubular reabsorption without any associated tubular injury [34].
Also, among drugs with ‘potential nephrotoxicity’, Penicillamine shows a strong association in this drug-reaction pair, with an IC025 of 6.8 for nephrotic syndrome. Its summary product characteristics (SPC) indicate that its association with the emergence of nephrotic syndrome is very common (>1 in 10 patients) [36], particularly in female patients and generally after 7 months of therapy [37], occurring in approximately 5–30% of patients [38]. Indeed, the mechanisms by which Penicillamine associates with the development of proteinuria result from induction by this drug of membranous glomerulonephritis [39,40].
Furthermore, Rivaroxaban (IC025 4.5 for hematuria), Acenocoumarol (IC025 4.8 for hematuria), Dabigatran (IC025 4.0 for hematuria), and Warfarin (IC025 4.6 for hematuria) all demonstrated significant associations with the aforementioned glomerular disorders and received a bibliographic score (BS) of 2, classifying them as ‘potential nephrotoxins’.
Bevacizumab was identified as the drug with the highest literary evidence of glomerular nephrotoxicity, exhibiting a BS = 3 and an IC025 of 5.9 for proteinuria and 3.9 for nephrotic syndrome, reflecting its strong connection to this phenotype. Literature references link it to glomerular microangiopathy [41] and the development of proteinuria [42] or nephrotic syndrome [43], with thrombotic microangiopathy being the characteristic histological pattern [44], although a few cases of IgA vasculitis with nephritis have been reported [45]. Lenvatinib, already recognized as nephrotoxic (BS = 3), also shows a strong connection to this glomerular disorder with an IC025 of 5.4 for proteinuria, a condition noted in its SPC [46] and other references [47]. The mechanisms appear to be similar to those of post-exercise proteinuria, with disruption of the podocyte-endothelial VEGF signaling axis, subacute thrombotic microangiopathy, and podocyte protein junction downregulation [48].
The future of research on adverse drug reactions may lie in pharmacovigilance studies integrated with electronic medical records, enabling retrospective analysis of identified adverse drug reactions [49]. However, prior genetic determination before the administration of drugs could also provide more information and safety in the realization of certain medications [50]. Additionally, artificial intelligence and machine learning will aid in the early identification of these reactions [51], allowing for a significant reduction in toxicity [52].
This study has several strengths. By obtaining its data from an already structured and anonymized database, based on the MedDRA and WHOdrug dictionaries, it significantly reduced biases resulting from the need to be processed by the authors. Its global origin strengthens the results obtained and reduces biases from local clinical practices. The scope of the data allows the results to be considered as potential signals in the identification or reinforcement of possible nephrotoxic medications, enhancing their recognition.
However, this study also has limitations. As it results from data derived from spontaneous notifications, the data exhibit biases of notification, which may reflect rare or atypical manifestations. As an analysis of spontaneous notifications, it is also not possible to establish a causal link between the reported medication and the identified manifestation. Representing the expression of spontaneous notifications, the vast majority with multiple identified manifestations and several drugs involved, it is not possible to assume that either the manifestation or the drug represents the true adverse reaction or the iatrogenic medication. In this sense, some medications may not be inherently nephrotoxic, but the phenotype attributed to them may result from all the aforementioned biases. We should also consider the bibliographic score as a study limitation. The developed bibliographic score, despite attempts to be comprehensive, is limited to the search of only 5 bibliographic sources, which may result in missing some references regarding the adverse reaction in question. This type of study also presents significant biases. These notifications can originate from trained healthcare professionals as well as from consumers or non-medical individuals like family or friends, thus reducing the accuracy of the correct medication–phenotype pair. Underreporting biases are also a concern, as they can lead to an underestimation of the frequency of adverse drug reactions. This may result in medications being falsely portrayed as safer than they actually are or affecting disproportionality indexes. Selective reporting bias is another issue, where newer (Weber effect) or severe adverse reactions, or those linked to well-known medications, are more likely to be reported, creating a skewed perception of risk. Moreover, due to the frequent involvement of multiple medications in the reports collected, determining the true “suspected drug” can be challenging and may lead to misattribution. Lastly, recall and information biases can distort clinical information provided in reports, potentially attributing causality incorrectly to a different medication.
Despite these potential limitations, this study sheds light on the medications most frequently associated with various glomerular disorders, highlighting numerous drugs both for their strong associative links to these glomerular alterations and for identifying potential new nephrotoxic agents. With this study, the authors aim to put into perspective the main medications reported and associated with various types of glomerular disease manifestations, drawing clinicians’ attention to the increased vigilance needed for patients receiving such medications. This, in turn, can help enhance medication safety.

5. Conclusions

Glomerular disease, while infrequently reported globally, stands out among various renal disorders in VigiBase. A significant percentage of the identified and categorized medications were classified as ‘non-nephrotoxic’ according to our classification system, yet they are notable for their strong association with this type of glomerular disorders. A wide range of pathophysiological mechanisms justifies the association between these evaluated medications and the phenotype in question.
However, these medications require further evaluation to ascertain the true risk of developing glomerular disorders among these potential new nephrotoxins.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm13164869/s1, Table S1: Most reported ATC classes in spontaneous notifications of drug-associated glomerular disease–WHODrug classification; Table S2: Most reported active ingredients (WHODrug classification) in spontaneous notifications of drug-associated glomerular disease (top-10); Table S3: Active ingredients (WHODrugs) with the highest disproportionality in drug-associated glomerular disease (top-10).

Author Contributions

A.B. wrote the draft, A.M. assisted in data elaboration, and A.M.M. along with A.C. revised the manuscript. M.A.P. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding for its completion. The article processing charges (APC) were funded by the Algarve Biomedical Centre/University of Algarve.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data will be available for consultation if deemed necessary. The data presented in this study were sourced from VigiBase. The interpretation and reporting of these findings are solely the responsibility of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official policy or interpretation of the Uppsala Monitoring Centre.

Acknowledgments

A very special thanks to the Uppsala Monitoring Centre for allowing access to VigiBase for the completion of this work. The authors would like to acknowledge the funding sources, namely, the research grant CAC/0007/2022 from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), the Algarve Biomedical Center (ABC) and Câmara Municipal de Loulé.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Schroll, J.B.; Maund, E.; Gøtzsche, P.C. Challenges in coding adverse events in clinical trials: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mehta, R.L.; Awdishu, L.; Davenport, A.; Murray, P.T.; Macedo, E.; Cerda, J.; Chakaravarthi, R.; Holden, A.L.; Goldstein, S.L. Phenotype standardization for drug-induced kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2015, 88, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Garnier, A.-S.; Laubacher, H.; Briet, M. Drug-induced glomerular diseases. Therapies 2023, 79, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Radhakrishnan, J.; Perazella, M.A. Drug-Induced Glomerular Disease. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015, 10, 1287–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Markowitz, G.S.; Bomback, A.S.; Perazella, M.A. Drug-induced glomerular disease: Direct cellular injury. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015, 10, 1291–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hamid, A.A.A.; Rahim, R.; Teo, S.P. Pharmacovigilance and Its Importance for Primary Health Care Professionals. Korean J. Fam. Med. 2022, 43, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Uppsala Monitoring Centre. Guideline for Using VigiBase Data in Studies. 2021. Available online: https://www.vigiaccess.org (accessed on 13 April 2024).
  8. Vogler, M.; Conesa, H.R.; Ferreira, K.d.A.; Cruz, F.M.; Gasparotto, F.S.; Fleck, K.; Rebelo, F.M.; Kollross, B.; Gonçalves, Y.S. Electronic Reporting Systems in Pharmacovigilance: The Implementation of VigiFlow in Brazil. Pharm. Med. 2020, 34, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Varallo, F.R.; Planeta, C.S.; Herdeiro, M.T.; de Mastroianni, P.C. Imputation of adverse drug reactions: Causality assessment in hospitals. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. European Medicines Agency. European Union. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/glossary/summary-product-characteristics (accessed on 1 May 2024).
  11. UpToDate. UpToDate. Available online: https://www.uptodate.com (accessed on 1 May 2024).
  12. Drugs.com. Drugs.com. Available online: https://www.drugs.com (accessed on 1 May 2024).
  13. James, E.T.; Douglas, A.M. Drug-Induced Diseases, 3rd ed.; American Society of Health-System Pharmacists: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ray, S.D. Side Effects of Drugs Annual 38—A Worldwide Yearly Survey of New Data in Adverse Drug Reactions; Elsevier B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  15. O’Shaughnessy, M.M.; Hogan, S.L.; Thompson, B.D.; Coppo, R.; Fogo, A.B.; Jennette, J.C. Glomerular disease frequencies by race, sex and region: Results from the International Kidney Biopsy Survey. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2018, 33, 661–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Paueksakon, P.; Fogo, A.B. Drug-induced nephropathies. Histopathology 2017, 70, 94–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bhatt, N.R.; Davis, N.F.; Nolan, W.J.; Flynn, R.J.; McDermott, T.; Thomas, A.Z.; Manecksha, R.P. Incidence of Visible Hematuria Among Antithrombotic Agents: A Systematic Review of Over 175,000 Patients. Urology 2018, 114, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Peng, Y.-C.; Lin, C.-L.; Yeh, H.-Z.; Chang, C.-S.; Wu, Y.-L.; Kao, C.-H. Association Between the Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Risk of ESRD in Renal Diseases. Medicine 2016, 95, e3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, B.; Li, D.; Xu, T.; Luo, M.; He, Z.; Li, Y. Proton pump inhibitors associated acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease: Data mining of US FDA adverse event reporting system. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Amin, R.; Ahn, S.-Y.; Moudgil, A. Kidney and urinary tract disorders. In Biochemical and Molecular Basis of Pediatric Disease; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 167–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Perazella, M.A. Clinical Approach to Diagnosing Acute and Chronic Tubulointerstitial Disease. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 2017, 24, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rossert, J. Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis. Kidney Int. 2001, 60, 804–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kelly, M.D.; Gibson, A.; Bartlett, H.; Rowling, D.; Patten, J. Tenofovir-associated proteinuria. AIDS 2013, 27, 479–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chan, L.; Asriel, B.; Eaton, E.F.; Wyatt, C.M. Potential kidney toxicity from the antiviral drug tenofovir. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2018, 27, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chadwick, D.R.; Sarfo, F.S.; Kirk, E.S.M.; Owusu, D.; Bedu-Addo, G.; Parris, V.; Owusu, A.L.; Phillips, R. Tenofovir is associated with increased tubular proteinuria and asymptomatic renal tubular dysfunction in Ghana. BMC Nephrol. 2015, 16, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hall, G.; Wyatt, C.M. Mechanisms of Proteinuria in HIV. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 749061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Singh, A.K.B.; Jeyaruban, A.S.; Wilson, G.J.; Ranganathan, D. Adalimumab-induced IgA nephropathy. BMJ Case Rep. 2019, 12, e226442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mertelj, T.; Smrekar, N.; Kojc, N.; Lindič, J.; Kovač, D. IgA Nephropathy in a Patient Treated with Adalimumab. Case Rep. Nephrol. Dial. 2021, 11, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jeong, C.W.; Lee, S.; Byun, S.-S.; Lee, D.H.; Lee, S.E. No Increase in Risk of Microscopic Hematuria with Aspirin Use by Asymptomatic Healthy People. JAMA Intern. Med. 2013, 173, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wallis, C.J.D.; Juvet, T.; Lee, Y.; Matta, R.; Herschorn, S.; Kodama, R.; Kulkarni, G.S.; Satkunasivam, R.; Geerts, W.; McLeod, A.; et al. Association Between Use of Antithrombotic Medication and Hematuria-Related Complications. JAMA 2017, 318, 1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Moudi, E.; Hosseini, S.-R.; Bijani, A. Higher rate of microscopic hematuria in elderly patients who take regular doses of aspirin: Result from AHAP Study. Casp. J. Intern. Med. 2016, 7, 278–282. [Google Scholar]
  32. Avidor, Y.; Nadu, A.; Matzkin, H. Clinical significance of gross hematuria and its evaluation in patients receiving anticoagulant and aspirin treatment. Urology 2000, 55, 22–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Davis, R.; Jones, J.S.; Barocas, D.A.; Castle, E.P.; Lang, E.K.; Leveillee, R.J.; Messing, E.M.; Miller, S.D.; Peterson, A.C.; Turk, T.M.; et al. Diagnosis, Evaluation and Follow-Up of Asymptomatic Microhematuria in Adults: AUA Guideline. J. Urol. 2012, 188, 2473–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, H.; Wahane, A.; Alhamadani, F.; Zhang, K.; Parikh, R.; Lee, S.; McCabe, E.M.; Rasmussen, T.P.; Bahal, R.; Zhong, X.-B.; et al. Nephrotoxicity of marketed antisense oligonucleotide drugs. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2022, 32, 100373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Law, S.; Arnold, J.; Rauf, M.U.; Heptinstall, L.; Gilbertson, J.; Rowczenio, D.; Baharani, J.; Langman, G.; Fontana, M.; Gillmore, J.D. Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis Complicating Therapy with Inotersen, an Antisense Oligonucleotide Inhibitor: A Case Report. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2023, 81, 606–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Available online: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/files/pil.2712.pdf (accessed on 27 April 2024).
  37. Habib, G.S.; Saliba, W.; Nashashibi, M.; Armali, Z. Penicillamine and nephrotic syndrome. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2006, 17, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hall, C.L.; Jawad, S.; Harrison, P.R.; MacKenzie, J.C.; A Bacon, P.; Klouda, P.T.; MacIver, A.G. Natural Course of Penicillamine Nephropathy: A Long Term Study of 33 Patients. Br. Med. J. 1988, 296, 1083–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Borrego García, E.; Hernández García, E.; Caba Molina, M.; Navas-Parejo Casado, A.M. Massive proteinuria for minimal change nephropathy secondary to treatment with D-penicillamine in a patient with Wilson’s disease. Case report. Gastroenterol. Y Hepatol. 2020, 43, 92–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Theodoni, G.; Printza, N.; Karyda, S.; Pantzaki, A.; Papachristou, F. D-penicillamine induced membranous glomerulonephritis in a child with Wilson’s disease. Hippokratia 2012, 16, 94. [Google Scholar]
  41. Person, F.; Rinschen, M.M.; Brix, S.R.; Wulf, S.; Noriega, M.d.L.M.; Fehrle, W.; Schmitz, J.; Schwarz, A.; Ivanyi, P.; Steinmetz, O.M.; et al. Bevacizumab-associated glomerular microangiopathy. Mod. Pathol. 2019, 32, 684–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kiyomi, A.; Koizumi, F.; Imai, S.; Yamana, H.; Horiguchi, H.; Fushimi, K.; Sugiura, M. Bevacizumab-induced proteinuria and its association with antihypertensive drugs: A retrospective cohort study using a Japanese administrative database. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0289950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. George, B.A.; Zhou, X.J.; Toto, R. Nephrotic Syndrome After Bevacizumab: Case Report and Literature Review. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2007, 49, e23–e29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Onteddu, N.K.; Vemula, S.S.M.; Areddy, V.R.; Onteddu, J.; Mabbu, T. Bevacizumab-Induced Nephropathy Presenting as Crescentic Glomerulopathy. Cureus 2023, 15, e48787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Endo, Y.; Negishi, K.; Hirayama, K.; Suzuki, H.; Shimizu, A. Bevacizumab-induced immunoglobulin A vasculitis with nephritis. Medicine 2019, 98, e17870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. European Medicines Agency. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Assessment Report—Lenvatinib. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/contact (accessed on 28 November 2023).
  47. Shibutani, Y.; Suzuki, S.; Sagara, A.; Enokida, T.; Okano, S.; Fujisawa, T.; Sato, F.; Yumoto, T.; Sano, M.; Kawasaki, T.; et al. Impact of lenvatinib-induced proteinuria and renal dysfunction in patients with thyroid cancer. Front. Oncol. 2023, 13, 1154771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Izzedine, H.; Massard, C.; Spano, J.P.; Goldwasser, F.; Khayat, D.; Soria, J.C. VEGF signalling inhibition-induced proteinuria: Mechanisms, significance and management. Eur. J. Cancer 2010, 46, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Choi, Y.H.; Han, C.Y.; Kim, K.S.; Kim, S.G. Future Directions of Pharmacovigilance Studies Using Electronic Medical Recording and Human Genetic Databases. Toxicol. Res. 2019, 35, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Swen, J.J.; van der Wouden, C.H.; Manson, L.E.; Abdullah-Koolmees, H.; Blagec, K.; Blagus, T.; Böhringer, S.; Cambon-Thomsen, A.; Cecchin, E.; Cheung, K.-C.; et al. A 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel to prevent adverse drug reactions: An open-label, multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised crossover implementation study. Lancet 2023, 401, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, S.; Kar, S. Application of artificial intelligence and machine learning in early detection of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and drug-induced toxicity. Artif. Intell. Chem. 2023, 1, 100011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Syrowatka, A.; Song, W.; Amato, M.G.; Foer, D.; Edrees, H.; Co, Z.; Kuznetsova, M.; Dulgarian, S.; Seger, D.L.; Simona, A.; et al. Key use cases for artificial intelligence to reduce the frequency of adverse drug events: A scoping review. Lancet Digit. Health 2022, 4, e137–e148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Main MedDRA terms reported and co-reported in the ‘Glomerular Disorders’ phenotype associated with drug use.
Table 1. Main MedDRA terms reported and co-reported in the ‘Glomerular Disorders’ phenotype associated with drug use.
Reported Preferred Terms (MedDRA)Co-Reported Preferred Terms (MedDRA)
Hematuria52.5%Fever6.3%
Blood urine present17.4%Fatigue5.8%
Proteinuria13.3%Nausea4.7%
Nephrotic syndrome6.5%Urinary tract infection4.4%
Protein urine present3.8%Headache4.2%
Albuminuria3.1%Diarrhea4.2%
White blood cells urine positive2.3%Acute kidney injury4.0%
Culture urine negative1.5%Vomits3.8%
Blood urine1.4%Anemia3.8%
Protein urine1.3%Pain3.8%
Table 2. Drugs most associated with glomerular disturbances or having a higher disproportionality index and their relationship with the bibliographic score.
Table 2. Drugs most associated with glomerular disturbances or having a higher disproportionality index and their relationship with the bibliographic score.
Active Ingredient% NotificationsATC ClassIC025PhenotypeBS
Bevacizumab2.9%L5.9Proteinuria3
Ibuprofen0.8%M0.3Proteinuria3
Lenvatinib0.4%L5.4Proteinuria3
Apixaban2.4%B3.5Renal Hemorrhage2
Clopidogrel2.1%B4.0Hematuria2
Inotersen0.3%N8.3Proteinuria2
Penicillamine0.5%M6.8Nephrotic Syndrome2
Acenocoumarol0.8%B4.9Hematuria1
Dabigatran2.5%B4.0Hematuria1
Lithium0.1%N2.8Nephrotic Syndrome1
Esomeprazol0.7%A0.9Hematuria1
Selumetinib0.1%L3.4Proteinuria1
Rivaroxaban7.5%B4.5Hematuria1
Warfarin5.4%B4.7Hematuria1
Acetylsalicylic Acid5.2%B3.9Hematuria0
Adalimumab1.3%L1.9IgA Nephropathy0
COVID-19 vaccine7.1%J1.9Proteinuria0
Enoxaparin1.7%B4.2Hematuria0
Heparin1.0%B4.2Hematuria0
Lansoprazole1.0%A4.4Proteinuria0
Omeprazole1.0%A3.1Proteinuria0
Pneumococcal vaccine1.0%J0.9Urinary sediment abnormal0
Tenofovir0.5%J2.8Proteinuria0
ATC: Anatomical Therapeutics Class; ATC:A—Alimentary Tract and Metabolism; ATC:B—Blood and Blood forming organs; ATC:J—Antiinfectives of Systemic Use; ATC:L—Antineoplastic and Immunomodulating Agents; ATC:M—Musculo-skeletal system; ATC: N—Nervous System.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baptista, A.; Macedo, A.M.; Marreiros, A.; Coelho, A.; Perazella, M.A. Drug-Related Glomerular Phenotypes: A Global Pharmacovigilance Perspective. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 4869. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164869

AMA Style

Baptista A, Macedo AM, Marreiros A, Coelho A, Perazella MA. Drug-Related Glomerular Phenotypes: A Global Pharmacovigilance Perspective. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(16):4869. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164869

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baptista, Alexandre, Ana M. Macedo, Ana Marreiros, André Coelho, and Mark A. Perazella. 2024. "Drug-Related Glomerular Phenotypes: A Global Pharmacovigilance Perspective" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 16: 4869. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164869

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop