Single Incision Sling Surgery for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Retrospective Cohort Single-Institution Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Patients and Methods
2.1. Study Design
2.2. Patients
2.3. Data, Clinical Examination, and Follow-Up
2.4. Surgical Technique
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Patient’s Characteristics
3.2. SIS Operation Outcome
3.3. Complications of SIS
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Abrams, P.; Cardozo, L.; Fall, M.; Griffiths, D.; Rosier, P.; Ulmsten, U.; Van Kerrebroeck, P.; Victor, A.; Wein, A. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 2003, 61, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Falah-Hassani, K.; Reeves, J.; Shiri, R.; Hickling, D.; McLean, L. The pathophysiology of stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2021, 32, 501–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Zheng, X.; Yi, X.; Lai, P.; Lan, Y. Electromyographic Biofeedback for Stress Urinary Incontinence or Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv. Ther. 2021, 38, 4163–4177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Rubilotta, E.; Balzarro, M.; D’Amico, A.; Cerruto, M.A.; Bassi, S.; Bovo, C.; Iacovelli, V.; Bianchi, D.; Artibani, W.; Agrò, E.F. Pure stress urinary incontinence: Analysis of prevalence, estimation of costs, and financial impact. BMC Urol. 2019, 19, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Nilsson, C.G.; Palva, K.; Rezapour, M.; Falconer, C. Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor. Dysfunct. 2008, 19, 1043–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abdel-Fattah, M.; Ford, J.A.; Lim, C.P.; Madhuvrata, P. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard midurethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: A meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. Eur. Urol. 2011, 60, 468–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mostafa, A.; Lim, C.P.; Hopper, L.; Madhuvrata, P.; Abdel-Fattah, M. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard midurethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. Eur. Urol. 2014, 65, 402–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Quintana Franco, L.M.; González López, R.; Garde García, H.; De Palacio Fraguas, A.; González Enguita, C. Long-Term Outcomes of the Altis® Single-Incision Sling: Up to 10 Years’ Follow-up. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2024, 20, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morán, E.; Pérez-Ardavín, J.; Sánchez, J.V.; Bonillo, M.A.; Martínez-Cuenca, E.; Arlandis, S.; Broseta, E.; Boronat, F. Mid-term safety and efficacy of the ALTIS® single-incision sling for female stress urinary incontinence: Less mesh, same results. BJU Int. 2019, 123, E51–E56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobashi, K.C.; Vasavada, S.; Bloschichak, A.; Hermanson, L.; Kaczmarek, J.; Kim, S.K.; Kirkby, E.; Malik, R. Updates to Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI): AUA/SUFU Guideline. J. Urol. 2023, 209, 1091–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rudnicki, M.; von Bothmer-Ostling, K.; Holstad, A.; Magnusson, C.; Majida, M.; Merkel, C.; Prien, J.; Jakobsson, U.; Teleman, P. Adjustable mini-sling compared with conventional mid-urethral slings in women with urinary incontinence. A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2017, 96, 1347–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alexandridis, V.; Rudnicki, M.; Jakobsson, U.; Teleman, P. Adjustable mini-sling compared with conventional mid-urethral slings in women with urinary incontinence: A 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2019, 30, 1465–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Abdel-Fattah, M.; Cooper, D.; Davidson, T.; Kilonzo, M.; Hossain, M.; Boyers, D.; Bhal, K.; Wardle, J.; N’Dow, J.; MacLennan, G.; et al. Single-Incision Mini-Slings for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 1230–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- White, A.B.; Kahn, B.S.; Gonzalez, R.R.; Rosamilia, A.; Anger, J.T.; Eilber, K.S.; Schaffer, J.I. Prospective study of a single-incision sling versus a transobturator sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 3-year results. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 223, 545.e1–545.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haylen, B.T.; de Ridder, D.; Freeman, R.M.; Swift, S.E.; Berghmans, B.; Lee, J.; Monga, A.; Petri, E.; Rizk, D.E.; Sand, P.K.; et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2010, 21, 5–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Doumouchtsis, S.K.; de Tayrac, R.; Lee, J.; Daly, O.; Melendez-Munoz, J.; Lindo, F.M.; Cross, A.; White, A.; Cichowski, S.; Falconi, G.; et al. An International Continence Society (ICS)/International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) joint report on the terminology for the assessment and management of obstetric pelvic floor disorders. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2023, 34, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Qatawneh, A.; Lari, F.N.; Sawas, W.A.; Alsabree, F.A.; Alowaisheer, M.K.; Aldarawsheh, M.A.; Alshareef, R.A. Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence by Obstetricians and Gynecologists in Jordan: A Nationwide Survey Study. Healthcare 2024, 12, 1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdel-Fattah, M.; Cooper, D.; Davidson, T.; Kilonzo, M.; Boyers, D.; Bhal, K.; McDonald, A.; Wardle, J.; N’dow, J.; MacLennan, G.; et al. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: The SIMS RCT. Health Technol. Assess 2022, 26, 1–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Dias, J.; Xambre, L.; Costa, L.; Costa, P.; Ferraz, L. Short-term outcomes of Altis single-incision sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence: A prospective single-center study. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2014, 25, 1089–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stav, K.; Dwyer, P.L.; Rosamilia, A.; Schierlitz, L.; Lim, Y.N.; Chao, F.; De Souza, A.; Thomas, E.; Murray, C.; Conway, C.; et al. Repeat synthetic mid urethral sling procedure for women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence. J. Urol. 2010, 183, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, A.; Kim, M.S.; Park, Y.J.; Choi, W.S.; Park, H.K.; Paick, S.H.; Kim, H.G. Retropubic versus Transobturator Mid Urethral Slings in Patients at High Risk for Recurrent Stress Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Urol. 2019, 202, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yao, J.; Tse, V. Twenty-Five Years of the Midurethral Sling: Lessons Learned. Int. Neurourol. J. 2022, 26, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Kocjancic, E.; Erickson, T.; Tu, L.M.; Gheiler, E.; Van Drie, D. Two-year outcomes for the Altis® adjustable single incision sling system for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2017, 36, 1582–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Erickson, T.; Roovers, J.P.; Gheiler, E.; Parekh, M.; Parva, M.; Hanson, C.; McCrery, R.; Tu, L.M. A multicenter prospective study evaluating efficacy and safety of a single-incision sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2021, 28, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van der Ploeg, J.M.; Oude Rengerink, K.; van der Steen, A.; van Leeuwen, J.H.; Stekelenburg, J.; Bongers, M.Y.; Weemhoff, M.; Mol, B.W.; van der Vaart, C.H. Transvaginal prolapse repair with or without the addition of a midurethral sling in women with genital prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: A randomised trial. BJOG 2015, 122, 1022–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiao, B.; Lai, S.; Xu, X.; Zhang, M.; Diao, T.; Zhang, G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision mini-sling (MiniArc) versus transobturator mid-urethral sling in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. Medicine 2018, 97, e0283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osse, N.J.E.; Engberts, M.K.; Koopman, L.S.; van Eijndhoven, H.W.F. Evaluation of the long-term effect and complication rate of single-incision slings for female stress urinary incontinence. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2021, 267, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rustia, G.M.; Baracy, M.G., Jr.; Drouillard, F.J.; Hagglund, K.H.; Aslam, M.F. Failure Rate of Retropubic Midurethral Sling with and without Concomitant Robotic Sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg. 2022, 28, 177–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, S.Y.; Kuo, H.C. Long-term outcomes of anti-incontinence surgery and subsequent transvaginal sling incision for urethral obstruction. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2019, 30, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Siblini, T.; Baracy, M.; Kulkarni, S.; Mabis, C.; Hagglund, K.; Aslam, M. Midurethral Sling Mesh Exposure Confers a High Risk of Persistent Stress Urinary Incontinence. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2024, 35, 1177–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Parameter | Mean ± SD or N (%) |
---|---|
Age (years) | 48 ± 11.3 |
Parity | 6 ± 3 |
BMI (kg/M2) | 29 ± 3.2 |
Menopause | 77 (70%) |
Anesthesia | |
| 40 (36%) |
| 71 (64%) |
SUI | 78 (70%) |
MUI | 33 (30%) |
Recurrent SUI | 18 (16%) |
Concomitant surgery | 44 (40%) |
| 44 (40%) |
| 39 (35%) |
| 13 (12%) |
Follow-up (months) | 19 ± 9.5 |
| 24 (22%) |
| 27 (24%) |
| 24 (22%) |
| 17 (15%) |
| 19 (17%) |
Cure | Pure SUI (N 78) | MUI (N 33) | p |
---|---|---|---|
Subjective cure | 67 (86%) | 23 (70%) | 0.046 |
Objective cure | 69 (88%) | 25 (76%) | 0.089 |
Primary SUI (N 93) | Recurrent SUI (N 18) | p | |
Subjective cure | 80 (86%) | 10 (56%) | 0.003 |
Objective cure | 84 (90%) | 10 (56%) | 0.0002 |
Altis® only (N 67) | Altis® + Concomitant surgery (N 44) | p | |
Subjective cure | 57 (85%) | 35 (80%) | 0.74 |
Objective cure | 58 (87%) | 36 (82%) | 0.50 |
Complications | No of Patients |
---|---|
Excessive bleeding | 1 (0.9%) |
Vaginal tape erosion | 3 (2.7%) |
Groin pain (mild, discomfort only) | 3 (2.7%) |
Urinary retention | 2 (1.8%) |
Re-operation | 10 (9%) |
| 3 (2.7%) |
| 2 (1.8%) |
| 5 (4.5%) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Qatawneh, A.; Thekrallah, F.; Alaqqad, H.M.; AlTayyar, M.A.; Ahmed, R.F.; Ashour, T.O. Single Incision Sling Surgery for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Retrospective Cohort Single-Institution Study. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 4908. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164908
Qatawneh A, Thekrallah F, Alaqqad HM, AlTayyar MA, Ahmed RF, Ashour TO. Single Incision Sling Surgery for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Retrospective Cohort Single-Institution Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(16):4908. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164908
Chicago/Turabian StyleQatawneh, Ayman, Fidaa Thekrallah, Huda M. Alaqqad, Maysa A. AlTayyar, Reem F. Ahmed, and Tala O. Ashour. 2024. "Single Incision Sling Surgery for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Retrospective Cohort Single-Institution Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 16: 4908. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164908