Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: A Lifeline to Quality of Life
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Nuss, D.; Kelly, R.E., Jr.; Croitoru, D. A 10-year review of a minimally invasive technique for the correction of pectus excavatum. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1998, 33, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fokin, A.A.; Steuerwald, N.M.; Ahrens, W.A.; Allen, K.E. Anatomical, histologic, and genetic characteristics of congenital chest wall deformities. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2009, 21, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poston, P.M.; Patel, S.S.; Rajput, M.; Rossi, N.O.; Ghanamah, M.S.; Davis, J.E.; Turek, J.W. The correction index: Setting the standard for recommending operative repair of pectus excavatum. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2014, 97, 1176–1179, discussion 1179–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haller, J.A., Jr.; Kramer, S.; Lietman, S. Use of CT scans in selection of patients for pectus excavatum surgery: A preliminary report. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1987, 22, 904–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stieglitz, R.-D. Bullinger, M. & Kirchberger, I. (1998). SF-36. Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Göttingen: Hogrefe. Preis DM 298. Z. Klin. Psychol. Psychother. 1999, 28, 143–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ware, J.E., Jr.; Sherbourne, C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med. Care 1992, 30, 473–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ellert, U.; Kurth, B.M. Health related quality of life in adults in Germany: Results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundh. Gesundh. 2013, 56, 643–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brazier, J.E.; Harper, R.; Jones, N.M.; O’Cathain, A.; Thomas, K.J.; Usherwood, T.; Westlake, L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: New outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992, 305, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kelly, R.E., Jr.; Mellins, R.B.; Shamberger, R.C.; Mitchell, K.K.; Lawson, M.L.; Oldham, K.T.; Azizkhan, R.G.; Hebra, A.V.; Nuss, D.; Goretsky, M.J.; et al. Multicenter study of pectus excavatum, final report: Complications, static/exercise pulmonary function, and anatomic outcomes. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2013, 217, 1080–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kelly, R.E.; Daniel, A. Outcomes, quality of life, and long-term results after pectus repair from around the globe. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 2018, 27, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hebra, A.; Kelly, R.E.; Ferro, M.M.; Yuksel, M.; Campos, J.R.M.; Nuss, D. Life-threatening complications and mortality of minimally invasive pectus surgery. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2018, 53, 728–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- World Health Organization. The constitution of the World Health Organization; WHO Chronicle; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1947; Volume 1, p. 29. [Google Scholar]
- O’Keefe, J.; Byrne, R.; Montgomery, M.; Harder, J.; Roberts, D.; Sigalet, D.L. Longer term effects of closed repair of pectus excavatum on cardiopulmonary status. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2013, 48, 1049–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kelly, R.E., Jr.; Cash, T.F.; Shamberger, R.C.; Mitchell, K.K.; Mellins, R.B.; Lawson, M.L.; Oldham, K.; Azizkhan, R.G.; Hebra, A.V.; Nuss, D.; et al. Surgical repair of pectus excavatum markedly improves body image and perceived ability for physical activity: Multicenter study. Pediatrics 2008, 122, 1218–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sigalet, D.L.; Montgomery, M.; Harder, J. Cardiopulmonary effects of closed repair of pectus excavatum. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2003, 38, 380–385, discussion 380–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farina, J.M.; Yinadsawaphan, T.; Jaroszewski, D.E.; Aly, M.R.; Botros, M.; Cheema, K.P.; Fatunde, O.A.; Sorajja, D. The electrocardiographic manifestations of pectus excavatum before and after surgical correction. J. Electrocardiol. 2024, 82, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jaroszewski, D.E.; Farina, J.M.; Gotway, M.B.; Stearns, J.D.; Peterson, M.A.; Pulivarthi, V.S.K.K.; Bostoros, P.; Abdelrazek, A.S.; Gotimukul, A.; Majdalany, D.S.; et al. Cardiopulmonary Outcomes After the Nuss Procedure in Pectus Excavatum. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e022149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jaroszewski, D.; Notrica, D.; McMahon, L.; Steidley, D.E.; Deschamps, C. Current management of pectus excavatum: A review and update of therapy and treatment recommendations. J. Am. Board. Fam. Med. 2010, 23, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Steinmann, C.; Krille, S.; Mueller, A.; Weber, P.; Reingruber, B.; Martin, A. Pectus excavatum and pectus carinatum patients suffer from lower quality of life and impaired body image: A control group comparison of psychological characteristics prior to surgical correction. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2011, 40, 1138–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Characteristics | |
---|---|
Age, y, median (IQR; range) | 18.7 (6.2; 14–51) |
Gender, n (%) | |
Male | 195 (83) |
Female | 39 (17) |
Haller index, median (IQR) | 4.0 (1.3) |
Preoperative symptoms, n (%) | |
Exercise intolerance | 199 (85.0) |
Psychosocial complaints | 156 (66.7) |
Dyspnea at rest | 168 (71.8) |
Cardiovascular Symptoms | 134 (57.3) |
Chest pain other than angina pectoris | 80 (34.2) |
Back pain | 83 (35.5) |
Muscle stiffness | 38 (16.2) |
Gastrointestinal Symptoms | 8 (3.4) |
Dimension (abbr.) | No° of Questions | |
---|---|---|
Functional status | Physical functioning (PF) | 10 |
Social functioning (SF) | 2 | |
Physical role limitations (PRL) | 4 | |
Emotional role limitations (ERL) | 3 | |
Well-being | Mental health (MH) | 5 |
Vitality (VI) | 4 | |
Bodily Pain (PA) | 2 | |
General health perception (GH) | 5 | |
Health change | 1 | |
Total | 36 |
Physical Functioning (PF) | This domain assesses the patient’s ability to perform basic and advanced physical activities of daily living. |
Social Functioning (SF) | This domain evaluates the patient’s ability to participate in social activities and maintain social relationships. |
Physical role limitations (PRL) | This domain evaluates the impact of physical health on the patient’s ability to carry out work or other significant role-related activities. |
Emotional role limitations (ERL) | This domain assesses the impact of emotional problems on the patient’s ability to perform work or other role-related activities. |
Mental health (MH) | This domain reflects the patient’s overall emotional and psychological well-being |
Vitality (VI) | This domain assesses the patient’s energy levels and overall sense of well-being. |
Bodily pain (PA) | This domain measures the intensity and interference of pain on daily life. |
General health (GH) | This domain captures the patient’s subjective assessment of their overall health status. |
Characteristics | |
---|---|
Bars inserted, n (%) | |
1 bar | 86 (37) |
2 bars | 140 (60) |
3 bars | 8 (3) |
Bar length, inches, median (IQR) | |
Cranial bar | 12 (2) |
Caudal bar | 12 (1) |
Tensiometrie, Nm, median (IQR) | 160 (50) |
Operation time, min, median (IQR) | 89 (38) |
Length of hospital stay, d, median (IQR) | 7 (2) |
Postoperative morbidity, n (%) | |
Bar displacement requiring reoperation | 9 (3.8) |
Empyema | 2 (0.85) |
Deep wound infection requiring reoperation | 3 (1.28) |
Pleural effusion requiring intervention | 2 (0.85) |
Pneumothorax requiring intervention | 10 (4.27) |
Hemothorax requiring intervention | 2 (0.85) |
Recurrence after bar removal | 2 (0.85) |
Wound infection | 4 (1.7) |
Chronic pain | 5 (2.13) |
Characteristics | German Population | Before Surgery | After Surgery | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Physical functioning (PF) | 94.9 (94.0–95.7) | 80.02 ± 20.7 | 94.68 ± 14.0 | 0.087 |
Social Functioning (SF) | 87.1 (85.6–88.7) | 68.05 ± 28.8 | 91.27 ± 16.2 | <0.001 |
Physical role limitations (PRL) | 91.5 (90.4–92.6) | 68.78 ± 38.7 | 89.69 ± 27.3 | 0.016 |
Emotional role limitations (ERL) | 88.8 (87.4–90.1) | 67.72 ± 40.3 | 94.53 ± 19.7 | 0.003 |
Mental health (MH) | 72.4 (71.2–73.5) | 65.19 ± 19.8 | 83.75 ± 13.6 | <0.001 |
Vitality (VI) | 60.4 (59.4–61.4) | 49.23 ± 19.6 | 71.43 ± 19.0 | <0.001 |
Bodily pain (PA) | 85.0 (83.5–86.5) | 68.34 ± 27.7 | 84.50 ± 21.7 | 0.002 |
General health (GH) | 74.5 (73.3–75.6) | 61.03 ± 23.2 | 86.54 ± 16.8 | <0.001 |
Summary | ||||
Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) | 55.8 (55.4–56.2) | 47.36 ± 10.2 | 53.99 ± 7.6 | 0.007 |
Mental Component Summary Score (MCS) | 48.0 (47.3–48.7) | 43.70 ± 11.5 | 54.42 ± 7.3 | <0.001 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Higaze, M.; Haj Khalaf, M.A.; Parjiea, C.; Sirbu, H. Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: A Lifeline to Quality of Life. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 6888. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226888
Higaze M, Haj Khalaf MA, Parjiea C, Sirbu H. Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: A Lifeline to Quality of Life. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(22):6888. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226888
Chicago/Turabian StyleHigaze, Mostafa, Mohamed Anwar Haj Khalaf, Chirag Parjiea, and Horia Sirbu. 2024. "Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: A Lifeline to Quality of Life" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 22: 6888. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226888
APA StyleHigaze, M., Haj Khalaf, M. A., Parjiea, C., & Sirbu, H. (2024). Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: A Lifeline to Quality of Life. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(22), 6888. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226888