The Assessment of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Methods in Endometrial Cancer
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Setting
2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
2.3. Sentinel Lymph Node Identification Procedure
2.3.1. Radioactive Tracer Administration (Tc99m)
2.3.2. Dye Administration
- Indocyanine green (ICG): a solution of 0.5 mL (1.250 mg ICG) diluted in 5 mL of water was injected at the same cervical positions as the radioactive tracer.
- Patent Blue: a volume of 2 mL (1 mL per injection site) was injected into the cervix.
2.3.3. Sentinel Lymph Node Identification
- Gamma probe (Gamma Finder 2, Word of Medicine): used intraoperatively to detect Tc99m activity within sentinel lymph nodes.
- VS3 iridium laparoscopic system (Visionsense 3DHD and IR Fluorescence V): enabled the visualization of ICG fluorescence and identification of Patent Blue-stained nodes.
2.4. Histopathological Examination
- Macrometastases: lesions > 2 mm.
- Micrometastases: lesions measuring between 0.2 mm and 2 mm.
- Isolated tumor cells (ITCs): lesions ≤ 0.2 mm.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
2.6. SLN Evaluation Parameters
- Detection rate (DR): the proportion of patients in whom at least one SLN was successfully identified.
- Bilateral detection rate (BDR): the proportion of patients with SLNs successfully identified on both sides of the pelvis.
- Sensitivity: the ratio of true-positive SLN identifications to the total number of patients with confirmed metastases.
3. Results
3.1. Patient Characteristics
3.2. Sentinel Lymph Node Detection
3.3. Metastases and Sample Quality
4. Discussion
4.1. SLN Identification Techniques
4.2. Detection Failures and the Issue of “Empty Nodes”
4.3. Strengths and Limitations of Individual Techniques
4.4. Histopathological Evaluation and Ultrastaging
4.5. Study Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ferlay, J.; Colombet, M. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Eur. J. Cancer 2018, 103, 356–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Concin, N.; Matias-Guiu, X. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2021, 31, 12–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Volpi, L.; Sozzi, G. Long term complications following pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer, incidence and potential risk factors: A single institution experience. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2019, 29, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ballester, M.; Dubernard, G. Use of the sentinel node procedure to stage endometrial cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008, 15, 1523–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delpech, Y.; Cortez, A. The sentinel node concept in endometrial cancer: Histopathologic validation by serial section and immunohistochemistry. Ann. Oncol. 2007, 18, 1799–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keshtgar, M.R.; Ell, P.J. Sentinel lymph node detection and imaging. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1999, 26, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodurtha Smith, A.J.; Fader, A.N. Sentinel lymph node assessment in endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 216, 459–476.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daraï, E.; Dubernard, G.; Bats, A.S.; Heitz, D.; Mathevet, P.; Marret, H.; Querleu, D.; Golfier, F.; Leblanc, E.; Rouzier, R.; et al. Sentinel node biopsy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer: Long-term results of the SENTI-ENDO study. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015, 136, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sozzi, G.; Fanfani, F. Laparoscopic sentinel node mapping with intracervical indocyanine green injection for endometrial cancer: The SENTIFAIL study—A multicentric analysis of predictors of failed mapping. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2020, 30, 1713–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tortorella, L.; Casarin, J. Sentinel lymph node biopsy with cervical injection of indocyanine green in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer: Predictors of unsuccessful mapping. Gynecol. Oncol. 2019, 155, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taşkın, S.; Sarı, M.E. Risk factors for failure of sentinel lymph node mapping using indocyanine green/near-infrared fluorescent imaging in endometrial cancer. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2019, 299, 1667–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tanner, E.J.; Sinno, A.K. Factors associated with successful bilateral sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015, 138, 542–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Altgassen, C.; Müller, N. Immunohistochemical workup of sentinel nodes in endometrial cancer improves diagnostic accuracy. Gynecol. Oncol. 2009, 114, 284–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amant, F.; Mirza, M.R. Cancer of the corpus uteri. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2018, 143 (Suppl. S2), 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Female Genital Tumours. WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
- Rocha, A.; Domínguez, A.M. Indocyanine green and infrared fluorescence in detection of sentinel lymph nodes in endometrial and cervical cancer staging—A systematic review. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2016, 206, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu-Rustum, N.R. Update on sentinel node mapping in uterine cancer: 10-year experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2014, 40, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossi, E.C.; Kowalski, L.D. A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): A multicentre, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, S.; Yoo, H.J. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: Meta-analysis of 26 studies. Gynecol. Oncol. 2011, 123, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holloway, R.W.; Abu-Rustum, N.R. Sentinel lymph node mapping and staging in endometrial cancer: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology literature review with consensus recommendations. Gynecol. Oncol. 2017, 146, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Body, N.; Grégoire, J. Tips and tricks to improve sentinel lymph node mapping with Indocyanin green in endometrial cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2018, 150, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geppert, B.; Lönnerfors, C. A study on uterine lymphatic anatomy for standardization of pelvic sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2017, 145, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khoury-Collado, F.; Glaser, G.E. Improving sentinel lymph node detection rates in endometrial cancer: How many cases are needed? Gynecol. Oncol. 2009, 115, 453–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Holub, Z.; Jabor, A. Laparoscopic detection of sentinel lymph nodes using blue dye in women with cervical and endometrial cancer. Med. Sci. Monit. 2004, 10, CR587-91. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Smith, B.; Backes, F. The role of sentinel lymph nodes in endometrial and cervical cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015, 112, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vermeeren, L.; van der Ploeg, I.M. SPECT/CT for preoperative sentinel node localization. J. Surg. Oncol. 2010, 101, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keidar, Z.; Israel, O. SPECT/CT in tumor imaging: Technical aspects and clinical applications. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2003, 33, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadia, A.; Zapardiel, I. Sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma: A focus on bilateral mapping identification by comparing radiotracer Tc99m with blue dye versus indocyanine green fluorescent dye. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 143, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Feature | Characteristic | N | % |
---|---|---|---|
Histologic Type | Endometrioid | 113 | 95.0% |
Serous | 3 | 2.5% | |
Clear-Cell | 3 | 2.5% | |
Lymphovascular Space Invasion (LVSI) | Present | 12 | 10.0% |
Absent | 107 | 90.0% | |
Myometrial Invasion | 0% | 10 | 8.4% |
<50% | 66 | 55.5% | |
>50% | 43 | 36.1% | |
Lymphadenectomy | Bilateral Pelvic | 20 | 16.8% |
Paraaortic | 7 | 5.9% | |
FIGO Stage | IA | 11 | 9.2% |
IB | 56 | 47.1% | |
II | 31 | 26.1% | |
IIIA | 3 | 2.5% | |
IIIB | 2 | 1.7% | |
IIIC1 | 12 | 10.1% | |
IIIC2 | 4 | 3.3% | |
FIGO Grade | G1 | 59 | 49.6% |
G2 | 52 | 43.7% | |
G3 | 8 | 6.7% | |
Total | 119 | 100.0% |
Parameter | Tc99m (N = 25) | Blue Dye (N = 11) | ICG 2 (N = 14) | Tc99m + Blue Dye (N = 37) | Tc99m + ICG 2 (N = 32) | Total Cohort (N = 119) | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall Detection Rate | 24 (96.0%) | 11 (100.0%) | 14 (100.0%) | 36 (97.3%) | 31 (96.9%) | 116 (97.5%) | 0.921 |
Bilateral Detection Rate | 20 (80.0%) | 10 (91.0%) | 12 (85.7%) | 32 (86.5%) | 29 (90.6%) | 103 (86.5%) | 0.815 |
Confirmed Metastases | 5 (25.0%) | 1 (9.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (16.2%) | 2 (6.3%) | 14 (11.8%) | 0.266 |
Lymph Node Location | Unilateral Metastases (N = 8) | Bilateral Metastases (N = 5) | Isolated Metastasis (N = 1) |
---|---|---|---|
Obturator | 5 | 7 | 0 |
External Iliac | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Internal Iliac | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Common Iliac | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Para-aortic | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Szatkowski, W.; Pniewska, K.; Janeczek, M.; Ryś, J.; Banaś, T.; Muzykiewicz, K.; Iwańska, E.; Jakubowicz, J.; Karolewski, K.; Szadurska, A.; et al. The Assessment of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Methods in Endometrial Cancer. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030676
Szatkowski W, Pniewska K, Janeczek M, Ryś J, Banaś T, Muzykiewicz K, Iwańska E, Jakubowicz J, Karolewski K, Szadurska A, et al. The Assessment of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Methods in Endometrial Cancer. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(3):676. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030676
Chicago/Turabian StyleSzatkowski, Wiktor, Karolina Pniewska, Maja Janeczek, Janusz Ryś, Tomasz Banaś, Konrad Muzykiewicz, Ewa Iwańska, Jerzy Jakubowicz, Kazimierz Karolewski, Agnieszka Szadurska, and et al. 2025. "The Assessment of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Methods in Endometrial Cancer" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 3: 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030676
APA StyleSzatkowski, W., Pniewska, K., Janeczek, M., Ryś, J., Banaś, T., Muzykiewicz, K., Iwańska, E., Jakubowicz, J., Karolewski, K., Szadurska, A., & Blecharz, P. (2025). The Assessment of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Methods in Endometrial Cancer. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(3), 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030676