Next Article in Journal
Primary Lung Tumors in Children: Insights from a Single-Center Case Series
Previous Article in Journal
Post-Thromboembolectomy Pseudoaneurysms Affecting Below-the-Knee Arteries and Their Management Strategies: A Literature Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: Exciting Avenues Beyond Weight Loss
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Practices of Rapid Sequence Induction for Prevention of Aspiration—An International Declarative Survey

1
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, F-76000 Rouen, France
2
Univ Rouen Normandie, Inserm U1096, F-76000 Rouen, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(7), 2177; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072177
Submission received: 3 December 2024 / Revised: 11 March 2025 / Accepted: 14 March 2025 / Published: 22 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue General Anesthesia: Recent Developments and Emerging Trends)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Rapid sequence induction (RSI) for the prevention of aspiration is a frequent clinical situation during anesthesia. The lack of international guidelines on this topic may lead to differences in practices. The aim of this survey is to identify the clinical practices in RSI among practitioners at an international level. Methods: International declarative survey across the ESAIC network. Results: A total of 491 respondents in 61 countries, 74% of them were seniors and 42% with over 20 years of experience. Most of the practitioners (87%) performed preoxygenation under a high flow of oxygen (>10 L/min) with no PEEP and no pressure support and 69% use opioids in most cases of RSI. The Sellick maneuver was used by 42% of respondents. RSI was used in most situations at high risk of aspiration (bowel obstruction, trauma within 6 h after the last meal, caesarian section). RSI was used in 53% of cases of appendicectomy in the absence of vomiting. Conversely, 29% did not use RSI in cases of symptomatic esophageal reflux. A total of 11% encountered at least one episode of grade IV anaphylaxis to succinylcholine or rocuronium and 24% aspiration pneumonia. Conclusions: Our results support the need for international guidelines on RSI to limit differences between practitioners and countries.
Keywords: anesthesia; pneumonia; aspiration; rapid sequence induction and intubation; surveys and questionnaires anesthesia; pneumonia; aspiration; rapid sequence induction and intubation; surveys and questionnaires

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ben-Naoui, I.; Compère, V.; Clavier, T.; Besnier, E. Practices of Rapid Sequence Induction for Prevention of Aspiration—An International Declarative Survey. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 2177. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072177

AMA Style

Ben-Naoui I, Compère V, Clavier T, Besnier E. Practices of Rapid Sequence Induction for Prevention of Aspiration—An International Declarative Survey. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(7):2177. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072177

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ben-Naoui, Imen, Vincent Compère, Thomas Clavier, and Emmanuel Besnier. 2025. "Practices of Rapid Sequence Induction for Prevention of Aspiration—An International Declarative Survey" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 7: 2177. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072177

APA Style

Ben-Naoui, I., Compère, V., Clavier, T., & Besnier, E. (2025). Practices of Rapid Sequence Induction for Prevention of Aspiration—An International Declarative Survey. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(7), 2177. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072177

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop