Next Article in Journal
Complementary Strategies for Biological Control of Aphids and Related Virus Transmission in Sugar Beet to Replace Neonicotinoids
Previous Article in Journal
Research on the End Effector and Optimal Motion Control Strategy for a Plug Seedling Transplanting Parallel Robot
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Different Long-Term Fertilizer Management Systems on Soil Microbial Biomass Turnover in a Double-Cropping Rice Field in Southern China

1
Farming Ecology Department, Hunan Soil and Fertilizer Institute, Changsha 410125, China
2
Plant Science and Technology Department, Hunan Biological and Electromechanical Polytechnic, Changsha 410127, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2022, 12(10), 1662; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101662
Submission received: 9 September 2022 / Revised: 26 September 2022 / Accepted: 4 October 2022 / Published: 11 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrient Cycling in Agro-Ecosystems)

Abstract

:
Soil microbial biomass content is usually regarded as an early indicator of changes in soil quality and soil fertility in paddy fields. Soil microbial biomass turnover is mainly influenced by the application of different fertilizer management systems. However, there is still a need to further investigate the effects of different long-term fertilizer management systems on soil microbial biomass turnover in paddy fields under the double-cropping rice (Oryza sativa L.) system. Therefore, the effects of different long-term (36 years) fertilizer practices on soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and soil microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN) contents, and the flux turnover rates of SMBC and SMBN at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm layers in a double-cropping rice field in southern China were investigated in the present paper. The field experiment included four different fertilizer treatments: MF, RF, OM, and CK. The results showed that SMBC and SMBN contents at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with RF and OM treatments were increased compared with the MF and CK treatments. Compared with the CK treatment, SMBC contents at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with RF and OM treatments increased by 35.72% and 50.28%, and 32.29% and 42.77%, respectively. SMBN contents at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with RF and OM treatments increased by 15.52% and 22.70%, and 16.32% and 21.49%, respectively. The fluxes of SMBC and SMBN at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with RF and OM treatments were significantly higher than those of the CK treatment. This result indicated that the flux turnover rates of SMBC and SMBN at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with the MF, RF, and OM treatments were significantly higher than those of the CK treatment. Compared with the CK treatment, the flux turnover rates of SMBC and SMBN at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with OM treatment increased by 46.10% and 48.59%, and 73.39% and 116.67%, respectively. SMBC and SMBN contents, and the flux turnover rates of SMBC and SMBN at the 0–10 cm layer were higher than those of the 10–20 cm layer under the same fertilizer treatment condition. Early rice and later rice yields with RF and OM treatments were significantly higher than those of the MF and CK treatments. As a result, the combined application of crop residue and organic manure with inorganic fertilizer management is a beneficial practice for increasing soil nutrients and rice yield under the double-cropping rice system in southern Chin.

1. Introduction

Soil microbial biomass (SMB) plays an important role in regulating soil nutrient, including soil carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), sulfur (S) and so on [1]. It is generally believed that the SMB content is regarded as an early indicator of changes of soil quality and soil fertility as it is sensitive to external environmental change [1]. The SMB content (soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and soil microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN)) is more sensitive to variation of the soil environment [2], which are frequently influenced by different field management systems, such as cropping systems, tillage, crop residue, fertilizer regimes, and so on [3,4].
In recent years, it has mainly been accepted that SMB content is closely related with its turnover in agricultural soil, which is mainly influenced by the application of different types of fertilizer management [5]. In order to improve soil productivity in paddy fields, soil microbial processes play vital roles in increasing C and N converted into soil organic matter (SOM) under different fertilizer conditions [6]. In a previous study, research showed that SMBC and SMBN contents were increased under the application of a mineral fertilizer condition [7], but other studies indicated that SMB content was not significantly affected by mineral fertilizer treatment, and even that soil microbial diversity was negatively impacted by N fertilizer treatment [8]. Moreover, many results indicated that SMBC and SMBN contents were increased through the application of organic manure or organic manure with inorganic fertilizer, and even that soil microbial diversity was positively impacted by organic manure or organic manure with inorganic fertilizer treatments [6,9]. Many studies were conducted to explore the effects of different fertilizer management practices on SMBC and SMBN contents in paddy fields [10,11], but there is still a need to further study the effects of different long-term fertilizer treatments on SMB content and its turnover in the double-cropping rice field.
The double-cropping rice (Oryza sativa L.) system (early rice and late rice) is the mainly cropping system in southern China [12]. It is a beneficial practice for maintaining or increasing soil quality and fertility in paddy fields via the combined application of organic fertilizer and inorganic fertilizer [5]. In a previous study, our results indicated that soil organic carbon (SOC) and SMB content at the soil plough layer were clearly influenced by the use of different fertilizer management systems [10,13]. However, there is little information about the effects of different long-term fertilizer management systems on SMB content and its turnover at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers in southern China. We hypothesized that: (i) the SMB content is increased via the application of organic matter with chemical fertilizer; and (ii) the flux and turnover rate of SMBC and SMBN in paddy fields are changed by the combined application of organic matter with chemical fertilizer. Therefore, the aims of this study were: (1) to analysis the changes of SMB content at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with different fertilizer treatments; and (2) to investigate the effects of different fertilizer treatments on the flux and turnover rate of SMBC and SMBN in the double-cropping rice field.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sites and Cropping System

The field experiment began in 1986. It was located in Ningxiang City (28°07′ N, 112°18′ E) in Hunan Province, China. More detailed information about the climatic conditions during the field experiment, the region, and the soil physical and chemical properties at the 0–20 cm layer at the beginning of this field experiment and the cropping system was described by Tang et al. (2018) [14].

2.2. Experimental Design

The field experiment included four fertilizer treatments: chemical fertilizer alone (MF), rice straw and chemical fertilizer (RF), 30% organic manure and 70% chemical fertilizer (OM), and without fertilizer input as a control (CK). A randomized block design was applied with each plot, with three replications of each fertilizer treatment. The area of each plot was 66.7 m2 (10 m × 6.67 m), and the distance between different plots was 20 cm. The cropping system of this experimental field was barley–early rice–late rice. During the early rice growth period, the total amount of N, phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5), and potassium oxide (K2O) for MF, RF, and OM treatments was 142.5, 54.0, and 63.0 kg ha−1. During the barley and late rice growth periods, the total amount of N, P2O5, and K2O for the MF, RF, and OM treatments was 157.5, 43.2, and 81.0 kg ha−1, respectively. The kind of organic manure for the OM treatment was decomposed chicken manure. More detail information about fertilizer management and other field management was described by Tang et al. (2018) [14].

2.3. Soil Sampling

Soil samples were collected at the maturity stage of late rice in October 2021. Soil samples close to rice plants were sampled at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers in the paddy field. Correspondingly, one soil composite from ten points was collected from each plot. Thus, three soil composite samples were collected for each fertilizer treatment. The fresh soil sample was transported to the laboratory. After removing the visible organic material, stones, and rice root by hand, the soil samples were then air dried at room temperature and sieved through a 2 mm sieve for chemical analysis in the laboratory.

2.4. Soil Laboratory Analysis

2.4.1. Soil Bulk Density

Soil bulk density (BD) at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm layers was determined by using a metallic core of a known volume (having a 10 cm internal diameter and a 20.0 cm length). These soil samples were oven dried at 105 °C for 24 h to a constant weight for calculating the dry weight of the soil samples [15].

2.4.2. Soil Microbial Biomass Content

Soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and soil microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN) contents were measured using the fumigation–extraction method as described by Wu et al. (1990) [16]. Briefly, each soil sample was divided into two parts; one part was fumigated for 24 h with ethanol-free chloroform, and the other part was unfumigated as a control. The fumigated and unfumigated soil samples were shaken for 1 h with 0.5 M K2SO4 and then centrifuged and filtered.

2.4.3. Flux Turnover Rate of SMBC and SMBN

The flux turnover rates of SMBC and SMBN with all soil sample were calculated according to the following equation:
Flux   of   SMBC   ( SMBN )   ( g   m 2 a 1 ) = SMBC   ( SMBN ) ×   BD   ×   depth   coefficient Turnover   time
Flux   turnover   rate   of   SMBC   ( SMBN )   ( a 1 ) = Sum   of   dynamic   decrease   ( or   increase )   of   SMBC   ( SMBN )   in   a   year Average   value   of   SMBC   ( SMBN )   in   a   year
Fluxturnover   time   ofSMBC   ( SMBN )   ( a 1 ) = 1 Flux   turnover   rate   of   SMBC   ( SMBN )
where the depth coefficient every 10 cm of sampling depth was 1.

2.4.4. Yield of Early Rice and Later Rice

At the maturity stages of early rice and late rice, rice yields were investigated from a 1 m2 sampling area in each plot at harvest and were expressed as rough (unhulled) rice at 14% moisture content.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The data of each of the measured items with different fertilizer treatment means were compared by using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) following standard procedures at the 5% probability level. All the statistical analyses in the present paper were conducted using the SAS 9.3 software package [17]. The results of each measured item with all fertilizer treatments were expressed as mean and standard error.

3. Results

3.1. SMBC and SMBN Contents

Compared with the MF and CK treatments, the SMBC contents at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with RF and OM treatments were significantly increased (p < 0.05). At the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers, the SMBC contents with the MF, RF and OM treatments were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those of CK treatments. However, there were no significant (p > 0.05) differences in SMBC contents at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers between RF and OM treatments. The result indicated that the SMBC contents at the 0–10 cm soil layer with the MF, RF, OM and CK treatments were higher than those of the 10–20 cm layer. Compared with the CK treatment, the SMBC contents at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with RF and OM treatments increased by 35.72% and 50.28%, and 32.29% and 42.77%, respectively (Figure 1a).
Compared with the CK treatment, the soil microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN) content at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with the MF, RF, and OM treatments were significantly increased (p < 0.05). There were no significant (p > 0.05) differences in SMBN contents at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers between RF and OM treatments. The result indicated that the SMBN contents at the 0–10 cm soil layer with the MF, RF, OM and CK treatments were higher than those of the 10–20 cm soil layer. Compared with the CK treatment, the SMBN content at the 0–10 cm soil layer with the MF, RF, and OM treatments increased by 9.25%, 15.52%, and 22.70%, respectively. The SMBN content at the 10–20 cm soil layer with the MF, RF, and OM treatments increased by 7.02%, 16.32%, and 21.49%, compared with the CK treatment, respectively (Figure 1b).

3.2. Flux of SMBC and SMBN

Compared with the CK treatments, the fluxes of SMBC at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with RF and OM treatments were significantly increased (p < 0.05). There were no significant (p > 0.05) differences in the fluxes of SMBC at the 0–10 cm soil layer between the RF and MF treatments. The result indicated that the fluxes of SMBC at the 0–10 cm soil layer with the MF, RF, OM, and CK treatments were higher than those of the 10–20 cm soil layer. Compared with the CK treatment, the fluxes of SMBC at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with the RF and OM treatments increased by 7.38% and 11.45%, and 7.79% and 19.39%, respectively (Figure 2a).
Compared with the CK treatment, the fluxes of SMBN at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with the MF, RF, and OM treatments were significantly increased (p < 0.05). There were no significant (p > 0.05) difference in fluxes of SMBN at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers between the MF, RF, and OM treatments. The results indicated that the fluxes of SMBN at the 0–10 cm soil layer with the MF, RF, OM, and CK treatments were higher than those of the 10–20 cm soil layer. Compared with the CK treatment, the fluxes of SMBN at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with the MF, RF, and OM treatments increased by 5.40%, 6.39%, and 8.67% and 4.34%, 5.97%, and 8.25%, respectively (Figure 2b).

3.3. Flux Turnover Rate of SMBC and SMBN

Compared with the CK treatment, the flux turnover rates of SMBC at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with the MF, RF, and OM treatments were significantly increased (p < 0.05). There were no significant (p > 0.05) differences in flux turnover rates of SMBC at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers between the RF and OM treatments. The results indicated that the flux turnover rates of SMBC at the 0–10 cm soil layer with the MF, RF, OM, and CK treatments were higher than those of the 10–20 cm soil layer. Compared with the CK treatment, the flux turnover rates of SMBC at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with the MF, RF, and OM treatments increased by 26.62%, 37.66%, and 46.10% and 29.58%, 45.07%, and 48.59%, respectively (Figure 3a).
This result indicated that the flux turnover rates of SMBN at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with the MF, RF, and OM treatments were significantly higher than those of the CK treatment (Figure 3b). The order of the flux turnover rates of SMBN at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with all fertilizer treatments was OM > RF > MF > CK. The result showed that the flux turnover rates of SMBN at the 0–10 cm soil layer with the MF, RF, OM, and CK treatments were higher than those of the 10–20 cm soil layer. At the 0–10 cm soil layer, the flux turnover rates of SMBN with the MF, RF, and OM treatments were increased 1.26, 1.50, and 1.73 times more than those of the CK treatments, respectively. At the 10–20 cm soil layer, the flux turnover rates of SMBN with the MF, RF, and OM treatments were increased 1.35, 1.72, and 2.17 times more than those of the CK treatments, respectively.
The results showed that the flux turnover times of SMBC at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with the CK treatments were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those of the MF, RF, and OM treatments. The result indicated that flux turnover times of SMBC at the 0–10 cm soil layer with the MF, RF, OM, and CK treatments were lower than those of the 10–20 cm soil layer. Compared with the CK treatment, the flux turnover times of SMBC at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with the MF, RF, and OM treatments decreased by 10.28%, 22.90%, and 42.52% and 13.45%, 22.27%, and 38.66%, respectively (Figure 4a).
Compared with the CK treatment, the flux turnover times of SMBN at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with the MF, RF, and OM treatments were significantly decreased (p < 0.05). The results indicated that flux turnover times of SMBN at the 0–10 cm soil layer with the MF, RF, OM, and CK treatments were lower than those of the 10–20 cm soil layer. Compared with the CK treatment, the flux turnover time of SMBN at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers with the MF, RF, and OM treatments decreased by 18.86%, 28.00%, and 47.43%, and 13.33%, 22.22%, and 44.00%, respectively (Figure 4b).

3.4. Early Rice and Later Rice Yield

This result indicated that early rice and later rice yields with RF and OM treatments were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those of the MF and CK treatments. Compared with the MF treatment, early rice and later rice yields with RF and OM treatments increased by 10.19% and 26.71%, and 11.33% and 6.93%, respectively (Figure 5). Compared with the MF treatment, double-cropping rice yield with RF and OM treatments increased by 10.86% and 15.12%, respectively.

4. Discussion

4.1. Effects of Fertilizer Managements on Soil Microbial Biomass Content

Soil microbial biomass is usually regarded as an early indicator of changes in soil quality and soil fertility in paddy fields [2], which are mainly influenced by the application of different fertilizer practices. In the present study, the results indicated that soil microbial biomass (SMBC and SMBN) contents in the paddy field were noticeably changed under different long-term fertilizer conditions, and the SMBC and SMBN contents in the paddy field with the application of crop residue and organic manure incorporation treatments (RF and OM) were higher than those of chemical fertilizer or without fertilizer input treatments (MF and CK). These results were consistent with hypothesis 1, namely, that SMB contents were increased by the combined application and management of organic matter and chemical fertilizer. The reason may be because organic matter (crop residue and manure) was provided a substrate for soil microbial activities, and the conversion rates of carbon and nitrogen were increased under the conditions of the combined application of organic matter and chemical fertilizer. These results, which also confirmed previous results [12,18], suggest the provision of a suitable, readily available source of a substrate and soil physical environment for soil microorganism activities. In the present study, this result also indicated that SMBC and SMBN contents in the paddy field with the MF treatment were higher than those with the CK treatment (Figure 1), which is in agreement with the previous results [10]. The reason may be attributed to the input of carbon from root/crop residue/rhizodeposition, which may have promoted soil microbial biomass growth with the application of chemical fertilizer. Similar results were also found by Jiang et al. (2006) [19] in China. In the present study, our results showed that rice yield provided the evidence of SMB content change in the paddy field (Figure 5). Rice yield (early rice and late rice) with the RF and OM treatments were higher than those with the MF and CK treatments. SMBC and SMBN contents with the RF and OM treatments were the highest compared with the MF and CK treatments. These results supported that rice yield and soil physicochemical characteristics under a double-cropping rice system were increased by the combined application of crop residue and organic manure with mineral fertilizer management [20].
In the present study, the results showed that the SMBC and SMBN contents at the 0–10 cm soil layer were significantly higher than those of the 10–20 cm soil layer in the paddy field; the reason was mainly attributed to the fact that organic matter (crop residue, organic manure) and chemical fertilizer were incorporated into the 0–10 cm soil layer combined with rotary tillage management when the depth of tillage was 8–10 cm, and the 10–20 cm soil layer in the paddy field was only slightly disturbed in the present study. On the other hand, the decomposition of crop residue and organic manure provided an abundance of available nutrients in the soil for rice root growth and soil microbial activities at the 0–10 cm soil layer [21].

4.2. Effects of Fertilizer Managements on Flux of SMBC and SMBN

In previous studies, the results showed that fluxes of SMBC and SMBN were significantly influenced by the application of different crop residue and organic manure incorporation practices [22]. In the present study, the results indicated that flux and turnover rate of SMBC and SMBN in the paddy field with RF and OM treatments were higher than those of the other fertilizer treatments. These results were consistent with hypothesis 2, namely, that the flux and turnover rate of SMBC and SMBN in the paddy field were changed as a results of different fertilizer management practices. The reason for this may be because organic matter (crop residue, organic manure) and chemical fertilizer were incorporated into the plough soil layer in the paddy field with rotary tillage, providing a larger amount of available substrate and soil nutrients for soil microbial growth and multiplication. On the other hand, the soil active organic pool and soil microorganism metabolism were promoted; therefore, the transformation and supply capacity of soil organic nutrients were improved. Moreover, our results indicated that the flux turnover rates of SMBC and SMBN in the paddy field with the MF treatment were higher than those of the CK treatment, suggested that rice root growth and the return of residue to the paddy field were increased under the condition of long-term application of chemical fertilizer, the crop residue decomposing and providing available nutrients and substrate for soil microbial growth and multiplication [21].
In the present study, our results indicated that the flux turnover times of SMBC and SMBN in the paddy field with the RF and OM treatments were lower than those of the other fertilizer treatments, which agreed with the previous results [22]. The reason may be because the crop residue and organic manure were incorporated into the ploughed soil layer in the paddy field, suggesting that the protective effect of soil microorganisms and the decomposition rate were increased with the combined application with chemical fertilizer [23]. On the other hand, the SOC and soil nutrient content in the paddy field were increased with RF and OM treatments [10]. Moreover, this result indicated that the flux turnover times of SMBC and SMBN in the paddy field with the MF treatment were lower than those of the CK treatment, suggesting that the return of crop residue and organic manure to the paddy field, and the decomposition of crop residue and organic manure provided a larger amount of available nutrients and substrate for soil microbial growth, and the flux turnover rates of SMBC and SMBN in the paddy field were increased.
In the present study, this result showed that the flux turnover rates of SMBC and SMBN at the 0–10 cm soil layer were higher than those of the 10–20 cm soil layer in the paddy field, but the flux turnover times of SMBC and SMBN at the 0–10 cm soil layer were lower than those of the 10–20 cm soil layer in the paddy field under the same fertilizer conditions; the reasons were mainly attributed to the soil’s physical and chemical properties. The soil ecological environment at the 0–10 cm layer was improved with the incorporation of fertilizer under the combined application of rotary tillage practice, rice root exudation, and promotion of root activity. On the other hand, crop residue and organic manure were incorporated into the 0–10 cm soil layer in the paddy field, providing a larger amount of available substrate and soil nutrients for soil microbial growth and multiplication, thus improving the transformation and supply ability of soil organic carbon and nitrogen [13].

5. Conclusions

In the present study, this result indicated that SMBC and SMBN contents and their flux turnover rates at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers in the double-cropping rice field were changed under long-term fertilizer conditions. RF and OM treatments were effective measures for increasing SMBC and SMBN contents at the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers. Compared with the MF and CK treatments, the flux turnover rates of SMBC and SMBN were increased with RF and OM treatments. Under the same fertilizer condition, SMBC and SMBN contents and the flux turnover rates of SMBC and SMBN at the 0–10 cm soil layer were higher than those of the 10–20 cm soil layer, but the flux turnover times of SMBC and SMBN at the 0–10 cm soil layer were lower than those of the 10–20 cm soil layer in the paddy field. Furthermore, RF and OM treatments were beneficial practices for increasing early and later rice yields. As a result, the combined application of crop residue and organic manure with inorganic fertilizer was a beneficial management practice for increasing soil fertility and rice yield under a double-cropping rice system in southern China. However, future research is still needed to explore the effects of different types of long-term fertilizer management on soil carbon and nitrogen fixing bacterial communities under a double-cropping rice system.

Author Contributions

H.T. and X.X. designed the experiments. C.L., K.C., Y.X. and L.W. performed the experiments. L.S. and W.L. analyzed the data, H.T. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2022JJ30352), Innovative Research Groups of the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2022CX75), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872851, U21A20187).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data reported in this study are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the staff of the Ningxiang Agricultural Technology Extension Center for field management.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dou, X.L.; He, P.; Cheng, X.; Zhou, W. Long-term fertilization alters chemically-separated soil organic carbon pools: Based on stable C isotope analyses. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Liu, Z.J.; Zhou, W.; Shen, J.B.; Li, S.T.; Ai, C. Soil quality assessment of yellow clayey paddy soils with different productivity. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2014, 50, 537–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rodríguez-Murillo, J.C. Organic carbon content under different types land use and soil in peninsular Spain. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2001, 33, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bhardwaj, A.K.; Jasrotia, P.; Hamilton, S.K.; Robertson, G.P. Ecological management of intensively cropped agro-ecosystems improves soil quality with sustained productivity. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 40, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Z.J.; Rong, Q.L.; Zhou, W.; Liang, G.Q. Effects of inorganic and organic amendment on soil chemical properties, enzyme activities, microbial community and soil quality in yellow clayey soil. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Luo, P.Y.; Han, X.R.; Wang, Y.; Han, M.; Shi, H.; Liu, N. Influence of long-term fertilization on soil microbial biomass, dehydrogenase activity, and bacterial and fungal community structure in a brown soil of northeast China. Ann. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Li, J.; Zhao, B.Q.; Li, X.Y.; Jiang, R.B.; So, H.B. Effects of long-term combined application of organic and mineral fertilizers on microbial biomass, soil enzyme activities and soil fertility. Agr. Sci. China 2008, 7, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sarathchandra, S.U.; Ghani, A.; Yeates, G.W.; Burch, G.; Cox, N.R. Effect of nitrogen and phosphate fertilisers on microbial and nematode diversity in pasture soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2001, 33, 953–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhen, Z.; Liu, H.T.; Wang, N.; Guo, L.Y.; Meng, J.; Ding, N. Effects of manure compost application on soil microbial community diversity and soil microenvironments in a temperate cropland in China. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, Y.L.; Tang, H.M.; Xiao, X.P.; Li, W.Y.; Li, C.; Sun, G.; Cheng, K.K. Effects of long-term fertilization management practices on soil microbial carbon and microbial biomass in paddy soil at various stages of rice growth. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo 2018, 42, e0170111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, W.H.; Zhang, X.T.; Wu, L.Q.; Rensing, C.; Xing, S.H. Short-term application of magnesium fertilizer affected soil microbial biomass, activity, and community structure. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nut. 2021, 21, 675–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, X.Y.; Ren, W.D.; Sun, B.H.; Zhang, S.L. Effects of contrasting soil management regimes on total and labile soil organic carbon fractions in a loess soil in China. Geoderma 2012, 177–178, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tang, H.M.; Li, C.; Xiao, X.P.; Pan, X.C.; Cheng, K.K.; Shi, L.H. Effects of long-term fertiliser regime on soil organic carbon and its labile fractions under double cropping rice system of southern China. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B—Soil Plant Sci. 2020, 70, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tang, H.M.; Xiao, X.P.; Tang, W.G.; Li, C.; Wang, K.; Li, W.Y. Long-term effects of NPK fertilizers and organic manures on soil organic carbon and carbon management index under a double-cropping rice system in Southern China. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan. 2018, 49, 1976–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Blake, G.R.; Hartge, K.H. Bulk density. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I: Physical and Mineralogical Methods Agronomy Monograph No. ASA-SSSA; Klute, A., Ed.; American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 1986; pp. 363–375. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wu, J.; Joergensen, R.G.; Pommerening, B.; Chaussod, R.; Brookes, P.C. Measurement of soil microbial biomass by fumigation-extraction—An automated procedure. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1990, 20, 1167–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. SAS. SAS Software of the SAS System for Windows, SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2008.
  18. Elzobair, K.A.; Stromberger, M.E.; Ippolito, J.A.; Lentz, R.D. Contrasting effects of biochar verse manure on soil microbial communities and enzyme activities in an Aridisol. Chemosphere 2016, 142, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Jiang, H.M.; Jiang, J.P.; Jia, Y.; Li, F.M.; Xu, J.Z. Soil carbon pool and effects of soil fertility in seeded alfalfa fields on the semi-arid Loess Plateau in China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 2350–2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Q.; Zhou, W.; Liang, G.Q.; Sun, J.W.; Wang, X.B.; He, P. Distribution of soil nutrients, extracellular enzyme activities and microbial communities across particule-size fractions in a long-term fertilizer experiment. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2015, 94, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ai, C.; Liang, G.; Sun, J.; Wang, X.; He, P.; Zhou, W. Different roles of rhizosphere effect and long-term fertilization in the activity and community structure of ammonia oxidizers in a calcerous fluvo-aquic soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 57, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lu, M.R.; Li, Z.P.; Liu, M.; Jiang, C.Y.; Che, Y.P. Soil microbial biomass N turnover after long-term fertilization in paddy field. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2012, 45, 275–282. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ramirez, K.S.; Craine, J.M.; Fierer, N. Consistent effects of nitrogen amendments on soil microbial communities and processes across biomes. Global Chang. Biol. 2012, 18, 1918–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effects of different long-term fertilizer treatments on soil microbial biomass carbon (a) and nitrogen (b) contents in the double-cropping rice field. MF: chemical fertilizer alone; RF: rice straw residue and chemical fertilizer; OM: 30% organic manure and 70% chemical fertilizer; CK: without fertilizer input as a control. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different fertilizer treatments.
Figure 1. Effects of different long-term fertilizer treatments on soil microbial biomass carbon (a) and nitrogen (b) contents in the double-cropping rice field. MF: chemical fertilizer alone; RF: rice straw residue and chemical fertilizer; OM: 30% organic manure and 70% chemical fertilizer; CK: without fertilizer input as a control. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different fertilizer treatments.
Agriculture 12 01662 g001
Figure 2. Effects of different long-term fertilizer treatments on the flux of soil microbial biomass carbon (a) and nitrogen (b) in the double-cropping rice field. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different fertilizer treatments.
Figure 2. Effects of different long-term fertilizer treatments on the flux of soil microbial biomass carbon (a) and nitrogen (b) in the double-cropping rice field. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different fertilizer treatments.
Agriculture 12 01662 g002
Figure 3. Effects of different long-term fertilizer treatments on flux turnover rates of soil microbial biomass carbon (a) and nitrogen (b) in the double-cropping rice field. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different fertilizer treatments.
Figure 3. Effects of different long-term fertilizer treatments on flux turnover rates of soil microbial biomass carbon (a) and nitrogen (b) in the double-cropping rice field. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different fertilizer treatments.
Agriculture 12 01662 g003
Figure 4. Effects of different long-term fertilizer treatments on flux turnover time of soil microbial biomass carbon (a) and nitrogen (b) in the double-cropping rice field. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different fertilizer treatments.
Figure 4. Effects of different long-term fertilizer treatments on flux turnover time of soil microbial biomass carbon (a) and nitrogen (b) in the double-cropping rice field. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different fertilizer treatments.
Agriculture 12 01662 g004
Figure 5. Effects of different long-term fertilizer treatments on yields of early rice and later rice in the double-cropping rice system. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different fertilizer treatments.
Figure 5. Effects of different long-term fertilizer treatments on yields of early rice and later rice in the double-cropping rice system. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different fertilizer treatments.
Agriculture 12 01662 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, H.; Xu, Y.; Li, C.; Shi, L.; Wen, L.; Li, W.; Cheng, K.; Xiao, X. Effects of Different Long-Term Fertilizer Management Systems on Soil Microbial Biomass Turnover in a Double-Cropping Rice Field in Southern China. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1662. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101662

AMA Style

Tang H, Xu Y, Li C, Shi L, Wen L, Li W, Cheng K, Xiao X. Effects of Different Long-Term Fertilizer Management Systems on Soil Microbial Biomass Turnover in a Double-Cropping Rice Field in Southern China. Agriculture. 2022; 12(10):1662. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101662

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Haiming, Yilan Xu, Chao Li, Lihong Shi, Li Wen, Weiyan Li, Kaikai Cheng, and Xiaoping Xiao. 2022. "Effects of Different Long-Term Fertilizer Management Systems on Soil Microbial Biomass Turnover in a Double-Cropping Rice Field in Southern China" Agriculture 12, no. 10: 1662. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101662

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop