Next Article in Journal
Selected Soil Physicochemical Properties under Different Tillage Practices and N Fertilizer Application in Maize Mono-Cropping
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on the Hydraulic and Energy Loss Characteristics of the Agricultural Pumping Station Caused by Hydraulic Structures
Previous Article in Journal
Identification Method of Rice Seedlings Rows Based on Gaussian Heatmap
Previous Article in Special Issue
Smart Operation of Climatic Systems in a Greenhouse
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Insights into Agricultural-Waste-Based Nano-Activated Carbon Fabrication and Modifications for Wastewater Treatment Application

by
Syaifullah Muhammad
1,2,
H. P. S. Abdul Khalil
3,4,*,
Shazlina Abd Hamid
3,
Yonss M. Albadn
3,
A. B. Suriani
4,
Suraiya Kamaruzzaman
1,2,
Azmi Mohamed
4,
Abdulmutalib A. Allaq
5 and
Esam Bashir Yahya
6,7,*
1
Chemical Engineering Department, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
2
ARC-PUIPT Nilam Aceh, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
3
Bioresource Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
4
Nanotechnology Research Centre, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim 35900, Malaysia
5
Faculty of Applied Science, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam 40450, Malaysia
6
Bioprocess Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
7
Green Biopolymer, Coatings and Packaging Cluster, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2022, 12(10), 1737; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101737
Submission received: 7 September 2022 / Revised: 14 October 2022 / Accepted: 17 October 2022 / Published: 20 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Agricultural Engineering Technologies and Application)

Abstract

:
The past few years have witnessed extensive global industrial development that has led to massive pollution to most available water resources. There is no alternative to sustainable development, and the utilization of agricultural waste for wastewater treatment has been always a novel milestone in sustainable development goals. Agricultural-waste-based nano-activated carbon exhibits high porosity, great surface area, and unique surface functional groups that promote it to becoming a future and sustainable solution for wastewater treatment applications. Several modification approaches have been made to further enhance the adsorption capacity and reusability of such adsorbents. In this review, we presented the potential of agricultural-waste-based nano-activated carbon as a sustainable solution for wastewater treatment. We highlighted the fabrication process and properties of different nano-activated carbons in addition to different modification approaches to enhance its adsorption capacity. Finally, we critically discussed the recent advances in nano-activated carbon applications in water treatment including its role in drinking water filtration, organic dye removal, oil spill applications, heavy metals removal and the elimination of toxic compounds from wastewater.

1. Introduction

The world’s population has significantly increased from 3.75 billion in 1970 to over 7.91 billion last year (2021), and it is estimated to exceed 9 billion by 2050 [1]. Agricultural waste as well as agricultural pollution are predicted to increase as a result of the world’s population increasing. The last century has witnessed a huge increase in the agricultural waste production capacities of several countries including China, India, the United States of America and several parts of Africa and Europe [2,3]. However, most of this waste is biodegradable and not significantly toxic to the environment, but their accumulation and presence in large quantities can cause adverse effect to the environment. They can be utilized to solve other accumulative issues such as water contamination [4]. Various pollutants are deposited into the environment each year, such as organic compounds, heavy metals, chemicals, toxins and other hazardous materials that can nowadays be found in most of our eco-systems [5]. Ground and surface water are mostly the end-point of many contaminants that dissolve in water and remain for years, affecting marine life as well as plants, animals and humans [6]. Several approaches have been developed for wastewater treatment, which can be categorized into physical, chemical and biological approaches [7,8]. Physical approaches are the easiest and most used ones, which include filtration, adsorption, distillation, steam and stripping, skimming and sedimentation, etc. These approaches are used to separate the liquid (water) from different organic or inorganic pollutants. Among the physical approaches, the adsorption process is the most effective and widely used approach for wastewater treatment [9].
Several natural and synthetic adsorbents can be used to attract and accumulate water pollutants onto their surfaces and eventually to precipitate it [10]. This treatment process can be a specific or generalized step; some adsorbents are able to detect specific functional groups, while others are wide-ranging. Activated carbons are the most widely used adsorbent in water treatment applications; they have been incorporated into water filters to adsorb heavy metals and other chemicals from filtrated water [11]. Nano-activated carbon is a form of activated carbon that is characterized by its high surface area, which facilitates the adsorption of pollutants into the surface. The past few years have witnessed great advances in the fabrication and modification of nano-activated carbon for different wastewater treatment applications. Several review papers have been published on biochars [12,13,14], its fabrication [15], properties [16] and modifications [17]. In addition, normal activated carbon has also been covered in terms of most of its aspects. Heidarinejad et al. reviewed chemical activators used to produce activated carbon [18]. Shafeeyan et al. [19] reviewed the impact of changes in the surface chemistry and formation of specific surface groups on the adsorption properties of activated carbon. Lakshmi et al. [20] focused on the different aspects of activated carbon and covered the recent trends in the development and use of various activated carbon nanoparticles as anti-microbial agents. Limited works have addressed the use of nano-activated carbon in wastewater treatment applications. The novelty of the present work is the presentation of the utilization of agricultural waste in the production of nano-activated carbon for wastewater treatment applications. In this paper we present nano-activated carbon from agricultural waste, including its fabrication and properties, and highlight different modification approaches that have been conducted to enhance its function. We also critically discuss the recent advances in nano-activated carbon applications in terms of water treatment applications including its role in drinking water filtration, organic dye removal, oil spill applications, heavy metals removal and the elimination of toxic compounds from wastewater in addition to highlighting the challenges and prospectives that face this unique material.

2. Agricultural Waste: Types, Yield and Properties

Agricultural wastes are those which are generated as a result of different agricultural operations and processes [21]. Although most of these wastes are derived from natural sources and are not toxic to the environment, they can accumulate in large quantities and subsequently cause advert effect to humans, animals and even plants [22]. Agricultural waste can be mainly categorized into four main categories including crop residue, livestock waste, agro-industrial waste and aqua-cultural waste (Figure 1). Crop residue and agro-industrial waste are the largest available types of waste that are produced in large quantities on a daily and sustainable basis [23,24]. However, the lack of proper management practices of these wastes, following the lack of or limited adequate information, has continuously become a great challenge, which is too great to be downplayed.

2.1. Crop Residues Waste

Crop residues are the most common types of agricultural waste all over the world, with millions of tonnes produced every year, in which most of them are either burned or thrown into landfill. Crop residues include the straws of rice, oat, barley and wheat, corn stoves and the leaves of many fruit plants in addition to seed pods and shells. The global production of these wastes is projected to exceed 2802 million tonnes per year [25]. Corn stalks are the top produced crop waste with over 750 million tonnes produced per year, followed by wheat and rice with 600 and 360 million tonnes produced per year, respectively [26]. These organic wastes are rich in carbon, making them an attractive precursor material for nano-activated carbon production. Only a small portion of rice, corn and wheat crop residues are effectively utilized in some applications such as animal fodder and/or bioenergy production, while the rest is discarded into landfill or openly burned [27]. From a chemical aspect, crop residues contain from 40 to 45% carbon, 0.6 to 1% nitrogen and 14 to 23% potassium in addition to phosphorus and microelements that are necessary for crop growth [28].
Different types of crop residues exhibit different micro-morphological properties. In general, it has been stated that most crop residues are associated with a tubular structure, thick walls and abundant pores [29]. Thus, the resulting nano-activated carbon possesses a large specific surface area and a large pore volume and size, allowing for a great adsorption capacity. Zhang et al. [30] reported that the interior structures of rice straws have a large number of vascular bundle sheaths, intercellular canals and medullary cavities, which give these types of waste a high porosity and large surface area. In a recent work, rice-straw-based activated carbon was prepared and chemically activated by using KOH [31]. The authors stated that their activated carbon possessed a huge surface area of 1330 m2/g, which is a lot higher than that of raw rice straw (0.77 m2/g) [32]. Comparatively, wheat straw exhibits linear and multi-cavity structures that mostly bridge between the micro and nano pores that give this waste its complex network structure [33]. The properties of nano-activated carbon-based crop residues are basically dependent on the types of residues, and a good understanding of the characteristics and properties of each raw material is essential to fabricate nano-activated carbon with the desired properties.

2.2. Livestock Waste

Livestock waste consists of wastewater, solid manure from different farm animals and liquid manure. Out of these types of waste, solid manure has been used for the preparation of activated carbon as an environmentally friendly solution. Topcu et al. [34] successfully utilized poultry manure as a precursor material for activated carbon production. The production of animal manure in the European agricultural sector alone has exceeded 1500 million tonnes per year, which opens another source for activated carbon production [35]. Animal manure is a renewable resource as it basically comes from cellulosic feed and undigested residue, which is excreted by livestock animal species. Traditionally, animal manure is used as a fertilizer without any proper treatment, which can cause significant environmental problems including greenhouse gas emissions, public hazards (asphyxia poisoning and infectious pathogens), air quality deterioration and water pollution [36]. As a sustainable and eco-friendly solution, Tsai et al. [37] successfully utilized cow manure as a precursor material for activated carbon production and reported its great properties and a surface area of more than 950 m2/g. Owing to its organic source and its high carbon content, animal manure can be thermally converted (or further modified) into various forms of carbon materials and energy sources [38]. However, the low energy yield and air pollution resulting from manure processing for energy production has added additional value to it as a suitable and sustainable adsorbent for several environmental applications.

2.3. Agro-Industrial Waste

Agro-industrial waste is another type of agricultural waste that generated as a by-product from several food- and beverage-processing industries. Huge amounts of these wastes are produced every year. Sugarcane bagasse, for example, is generated from the sugar manufacturing industries, and approximately 180.73 million metric tons of it is produced every year, and it is estimated to reach 221 million metric tons in 2024 [39]. Other industries such as palm oil are also generating over 35.19 million tonnes of waste out of 85.84 million tonnes of the fresh fruit of the palm plant [40]. The huge amount of agro-industrial waste makes them highly attractive sources of activated carbon, and a significant number of studies have been conducted on the utilization of such waste in nano-activated carbon preparation [41,42].

2.4. Aquaculture Waste

The aquaculture industry is considered to be one of the fastest growing food production industries due to the fast-growing nature of fish as well as aquatic plants. Akinwole et al. [43] stated that feed has become the primary source of waste in aquaculture, followed by fish faeces. Both are harmful to fish and need to be removed as soon as possible, which means they can be utilized in nano-activated carbon fabrication [44]. In fish culture systems, the amount of released and uneaten feed varies with the system type. However, daily treatment is highly required in such systems, which generate an accumulative amount of such waste. Therefore, a general management plan and smart utilization is highly needed [45]. Limited works have been conducted on the management of aquacultural waste, and activated carbon is mostly used to treat water polluted by toxic materials in culture systems [44,46,47].

3. Agricultural-Waste-Based Nano-Activated Carbon: Fabrication and Properties

Generally, nano-activated carbon can be fabricated from different precursors including agricultural and forestry residues. These precursors are rich in carbon, leading to the production of high-yield activated carbon [48]. The production of nano-activated carbon can be achieved by grinding the clean waste into fine particles and then conducting thermal treatment of these particles (pyrolysis) followed by physical and/or chemical activation. Figure 2 presents illustration of the fabrication process starting from agricultural waste.
Pyrolysis is an essential process in the fabrication process, which determines most of the nano-activated carbon’s properties. Om Prakash et al. [49] recently synthesized nano-activated carbon using arhar fiber biomass and a novel technique consisting of two-stage pyrolysis followed by chemical activation. In this study, the authors used different temperatures ranging from 700 to 900 °C and reported that the one prepared at 800 °C exhibited the highest surface area (504.6 m2/g) with tiny surface micropores of a 20 Å diameter. Although a higher temperature was used, the optimum properties were not associated with the highest temperature. However, different precursor materials have different optimum temperatures for the best adsorption capacity. The optimal temperature and time depend on the type of precursor material and activation approach. It has been reported that carbon dioxide activation requires 800 °C and 1 h of holding time, compared with steam activation that requires only 700 °C and the same amount of time [50].
Physical activation can be achieved by further thermal treatment, steam exposure and microwave and/or ultrasound treatment [51]. The advantages of physical activation methods are their simplicity, the fact that they do not involve any chemical usage and the resulting production of microporous structures rather than the microporous structures achieved in the chemical activation process [52]. Carbon dioxide activation was found to produce a higher surface area and micropore volume than steam activation. In a recent study, the maximum surface area of CO2-activated carbon was 789 m2/g compared to steam-activated carbon with a maximum surface area of 552 m2/g [50]. Owing to the decomposition of cellulosic material in plant waste, the yield of nano-activated carbon decreases with increasing the temperature [50]. Thus, reheating activated carbon could further reduce the production yield. Chemical activation is more common, using several chemical compounds such as KOH, ZnCl2, K2CO3 and CaCl2. In the work of Gan, the author discussed different chemical activation agents and their effects on the adsorption performance [53]. Although chemical activation may involve the excessive use of chemical agents, several studies have reported an adsorption capacity of up to 99% of water pollutants from water [54]. Conceptually, chemical agents with dehydration and oxidation properties are more suitable for the activation of different plant-based carbons [55]. Refer to Table 1 for a summary of the different studies that have used different activation approaches.

4. Modifications of Agricultural-Waste-Based Nano-Activated Carbon

Although most nano-activated carbons exhibit a sufficient adsorption capacity for wastewater pollutants, scientists have always convinced themselves that much more can be done to enhance the adsorption performance of nano-activated carbon. Several approaches have been investigated including incorporating nano-activated carbon with metal oxides, enhancing the porosity and surface area of the particles using chemical or physical agents and the incorporation of activated carbon with specific chemical compounds for specific adsorptions.

4.1. Incorporation of Nano-Activated Carbon with Metal Oxides

To enhance the affinity of nano-activated carbon to the adsorption of heavy metals and other inorganic compounds, several elemental iron and iron (hydr)oxides have been used, especially for arsenic removal [66]. Nano-sized zero-valent iron was incorporated with activated carbon in one study, using ferrous sulfate impregnation followed by chemical reduction by NaBH4 [67]. The authors reported the significant enhancement of arsenite and arsenate absorption at pH 6.5, and they stated that the removal markedly decreased by using phosphate and silicate. However, metal cations such as Ca2+ and Mg2+ are known for their adsorption enhancement, while ferrous iron (Fe2+) suppresses adsorption. In another recent investigation, nano-sized hematite-modified nano-activated carbon was prepared by coating the activated carbon particles with α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles [68]. Such modification enhanced the adsorption of nano-activated carbon by three times more than non-modified one, the removal process occurred in shorter duration and the authors were able to effectively regenerate their activated carbon by using HCl with a minor reduction in the adsorption efficacy after four desorption–adsorption cycles.
The use of iron-based nano particles also has the advantage of easy regeneration using a magnetic field compared with other metallic oxides. Khalil et al. [69] developed this approach by using an ethanol medium and acid thermal treatment to produce modified nano-scale zero-valent/activated carbon to enhance the removal of nitrate and phosphate from water. The authors reported that the thermal treatment of nano-activated carbon before the supporting nano-scale zero-valent modified the texture and surface of the activated carbon, leading to an enhancement of the surface chemistry properties and thus a better attraction of contaminant anions (Figure 3). The same authors reported that their optimum modification enhanced the removal efficiency of nitrate by more than 170%, while the complete removal of phosphate was achieved, which came about due to the modified surface structure of the activated carbon. Such modification can be also applied with other types of activated carbon for the removal of other pollutants. Metal oxide particles supported on activated carbon can significantly enhance the absorption and adsorption efficacy of the materials and provide effective wastewater treatment.

4.2. Incorporation with a Specific Chemical Compound

Several chemical compounds have been incorporated with nano-activated carbon to target the adsorption of specific heavy metals or other toxic materials from aqueous solutions. In one recent study conducted by Sabermahani & Noraldiny [70], they developed a facile and low-cost activated carbon from apricot fruit nuclei and activated it with H3PO4 for the removal of thallium (I). The authors modified their activated carbon by incorporated it with rhodamine B for the specific adsorption of thallium (I). The addition of rhodamine B significantly enhanced the adsorption efficiency of the activated carbon. Owing to the strong attachment between the dye and activated carbon particles, the modified particles exhibited better adsorption characteristics compared to the non-modified ones. In a different investigation, Deng et al. [71] used pristine feedstock to fabricate activated carbon and then used chitosan and pyromellitic dianhydride as chemical modifiers. The authors stated that their modified activated carbon exhibited an increased number of surface functional groups compared with the non-modified one, which led to a better adsorption of heavy metal ions. The addition of chitosan and pyromellitic dianhydride supplied the particles with nitrogen-rich functional groups in addition to the C=C and N–C=O, which were mainly responsible for the adsorption of Pb, Cd and Cu from water. Zhou et al. [72] used the same modification principal and reported a significant enhancement in the adsorption capacity in a markedly shorter time.
Several functional groups such as oxygenated groups and phosphate can be incorporated on nano particle surfaces to promote metal particle anchorage, which facilitates and speeds up the adsorption of heavy metals and other metallic-based toxic compounds. Several studies have used graphene oxide as a chemical modifier to enhance the adsorption capacity of activated carbon, which is also a carbon-rich agent [73,74]. Such modification was conducted prior to the pyrolysis process, which resulted in oxygen-rich surface-functional groups. Owing to the unique structure of graphene and its ability to integrate within the mixture after the pyrolysis, the prepared activated carbon possessed a high surface area with a significantly enhanced adsorption capacity [73,74]. The surface modification of Pongamia-pinnata-shells-based acid-activated carbon has been conducted in different work using a cationic surfactant (Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) for the specific adsorption of organic dyes [75]. The authors stated that such modification significantly enhanced the uptake capacity of the activated carbon for organic dyes, which could be used as a cleaner alternative for dye adsorption from aqueous solutions. The same authors were able to regenerate their modified activated carbon and reuse it several times without any significant loss in adsorption capacity.

4.3. Enhanced Porosity and Surface Area

As an adsorption material, a large surface area is an essential character for most wastewater treatment applications. Reducing the particle size and porosity can significantly increase the surface area, leading to an enhanced adsorption efficiency. Lignocellulosic activated carbon was prepared and modified by impregnation with the precursor material in a Cu(NO3)2 solution [76]. The authors reported a higher mesoporosity in the modified particles compared with the non-modified ones, which enhanced their adsorption capacity. In different study, Huang et al. [77] investigated the effect of different activation parameters in the porosity and morphological characteristics of wood-sawdust-based activated carbon fibers. An enhanced porosity and a greater surface area were achieved with KOH activation and a temperature of above 800 °C, which generated nano pores ranging from 0.8 to 1.1 nm.
Enlarged pores can be obtained with increasing the KOH/material ratio and prolonging the activation time, and the authors were able to obtain larger pores from 2 to 5 nm [77]. The adsorption capacity of the adsorbent is directly proportional to increasing the surface area, which is also directly proportional to the porosity. Depending on the waste that needs to be absorbed, the pore size and surface functional groups of nano-activated carbon can be easily adjusted, especially with chemical activation. For this purpose, Abuzalat et al. [78] fabricated and modified nano-activated carbon from green algae Ulava lactuca using a novel and facile approach. The authors used zinc chloride for the activation and modification of their nano-activated carbon and reported meso–micro porous structures with a significantly higher surface area (1486.3 m2/g). With such a surface area, the authors investigated the adsorption capacity of the porous nano-activated carbon in the adsorption of organic dyes and stated a maximum adsorption capacity of 149.26 mg/g, which indicated the high ability of such a modified activated carbon in the adsorption of organic dyes. In a different investigation, Jain et al. [79] enhanced the porosity of sunflower-head-waste-based nano-activated carbon and evaluated it for the removal of Cu(II), Cr(VI) and Cd(II) ions from polluted water. The authors used mineral acids as the activation agents to increase the porosity of their nano-activated carbon, and they stated that sulphuric acid activation produced the highest surface area pore width and volume in addition to the highest porosity (Figure 4). Having such great characteristics, the nano particles immediately adsorbed 89.4% and removed 74.5% of the Cr(VI) and Cd(II) in the first 2 min.

4.4. Other Modification Techniques

The facile and eco-friendly modification of agricultural-waste-based nano-activated carbon has always been a great challenge due to the need for physical and/or chemical agents to enhance the properties of the adsorbent materials [11]. However, although some modification may not be completely eco-friendly, the enhanced removal of toxins and undesired material from wastewater is worth this slight sacrifice. A bimetallic platin–ruthenium nano adsorbent was used to modify and support nano-activated carbon using a thermal decomposition process [80]. The authors used the modified activated carbon for methylene blue dye removal from aqueous solutions and reported a great enhancement in the adsorption capacity, reaching 569.4 mg/g under the optimum conditions. In a different study, Deng et al. [81] modified their activated carbon by loading silver nano particles in its pores in order to enhance bacterial activation in drinking water. The authors used Escherichia coli as a standard bacterium for their investigation and reported that surface-bound silver (Ag I) was slightly converted to Ag as a result of structural reducing groups on the surface of the activated carbon (Figure 5). The attached silver nanoparticles were able to directly sterilize most of E. coli in the treated water by catalyzing O2 and H2O in the solution and generating reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS possess great disinfection properties for most microorganisms by the oxidation sterilization process [82]. The same authors stated that the pH strongly affected the inactivation process, and a neutral pH was the optimum compared with acidic and basic pH values. Figure 6 presents illustration of silver-nano-particles-based modified activated carbon for water disinfection and sterilization applications. Such modifications can open the door to reducing the excessive use of chlorine. Modified activated carbon may work in reducing toxic materials and disinfecting water from microorganisms at the same time without the need to further add water disinfectants. Other modification techniques have been used to modify nano-activated carbon, including ball milling and hydrothermal synthesis to further reduce the size of the particles [83,84], co-precipitation to integrate functional groups within the pores of the activated carbon [85], succinylation [86], and solvothermal treatment [87,88].

5. Agricultural-Waste-Based Nano-Activated Carbon for Wastewater Treatment Applications

Massive industrial development has accelerated the accumulation of waste in the environment, which eventually ends up in water bodies. Different agricultural wastes have been extensively investigated as precursor materials to solve the issue of water pollution [89]. They are suitable raw materials for the fabrication of enhanced nano-activated carbon, which can be used for drinking water filtration, the removal of dyes and organic compounds, the removal of heavy metals and the elimination of toxins and chemical compounds in addition to solving oil spill issues and in other wastewater treatment applications.

5.1. Drinking Water Filtration

Water filtration is an essential process that removes or reduces the concentration of most of the pollutants including suspended particles and microorganisms as well as undesirable chemical compounds from contaminated water. Several approaches containing filters and membranes have been fabricated for this purpose including micro-filtration, nano-filtration, reverse osmosis, pervaporation and ultrafiltration membranes [90]. Nano-activated carbons have gained tremendous attention recently in drinking water filtration applications due to their high surface area, nano porosity and high adsorption and removal performance in terms of organic as well as inorganic pollutants present in drinking water and wastewaters [91,92]. In a recent investigation, granular coconut-shell-based activated carbon was prepared and evaluated for the adsorption and removal of polystyrene nano plastics from drinking water [93]. Owing to the negatively charged granular coconut-shell-based activated carbon that interacted with the positively charged nano plastics, the authors were able to achieve a maximum adsorption capacity of more than 2.20 mg/g. The presence of dissolved organic matter significantly enhanced the adsorption capacity of the activated carbon, due to changing the surface charges on the nano plastics and the presence of divalent ions (Figure 6a). In a similar work, Altmann et al. [94] investigated a pilot scale of granular activated carbon integration into coagulation/filtration. The authors combined the adsorption of that activated carbon with deep-bed filtration (Figure 6b), and they were able to effectively remove both suspended solids and phosphorus from drinking water.

5.2. Removal of Dyes and Organic Compounds

Dyes are widely used in several industries such as the textile industry, paper, plastics, cosmetics, etc. Synthetic dyes are a specialized class of organic pollutants that, in most cases, are directly discharged into environmental ecosystems as wastewater from their industries [95,96]. These organic pollutants exhibit complicated structures from their aromatic assembly, making them difficult to degrade in natural conditions. Thus, it is necessary to develop an eco-friendly and cost-effective approach to treat water polluted with such pollutants. In a recent study, nano-activated carbon was prepared from Maghara raw Egyptian coal and investigated for the removal of methylene blue dye from wastewater [97]. In this study, the activated carbon particles had an average diameter of 38 nm and pore volume of over 0.183 cm3/g, resulting in a high adsorption capacity of 28.09 mg/g. In different study, Mousavi et al. [98] used corn stalks to prepare nano-activated carbon for the removal of rhodamine B dye from contaminated solutions. The authors were able to achieve a 5.6 mg/g adsorption capacity at the optimum conditions, which fitted pseudo-second-order kinetics and the Freundlich isotherm model. Owing to the porous surface and high surface area of nano-activated carbon, organic dyes can be easily adsorbed into these particles, resulting in great removal efficiency. In term of dye adsorption using of nano-activated carbon, the regeneration of the adsorbent has been always a great challenge due to activated carbon/dye bonding. Feiqiang et al. [99] developed magnetic activated carbon using a one-step approach for toxic dye removal from polluted water. The authors fabricated the adsorbent under a CO2 atmosphere and reported that the CO2 enhanced the surface area of the activated carbon, which enhanced the adsorption of the dyes. The authors were able to easily remove the dyes using an external magnetic field. In the same manner, Liu et al. [100] used the same principal for the fast and effective removal of organic dyes from an aqueous solution. The surface area and functional groups played a fundamental role in the dye and toxic material adsorption mechanism by attracting bonding between the chemical groups (Figure 7). The authors were able to achieve a great adsorption capacity of 182.48 mg/g and 150.35 mg/g for rhodamine B and methyl orange, respectively. Owing to the incorporation of iron oxide, the authors were able to easily regenerate and separate their adsorbent. Such effects and highly efficient adsorbents with a rapid magnetic separation have promising applications in different wastewater treatments.

5.3. Removal of Heavy Metals

Heavy metals pollution has become a major concern in recent times due to massive industrial development. Some heavy metals function as micro or even macro nutrients for certain animals and plants. However, in high concentrations they are highly toxic to most living organisms [101]. Hexavalent chromium is a toxic form of the heavy metal chromium that can irritate the nose, lungs and throat and cause other advert health effects. Li et al. [68] developed modified activated carbon that was able to significantly remove most of the hexavalent chromium from water. The authors coated their activated carbon with iron oxide nanoparticles using a facile impregnation approach, and they reported that this enhanced the adsorption capacity by three times more than the non-modified activated carbon.
Steam activation has been used to enhance the activity of carbon adsorbents in heavy metal removal applications. Lou et al. prepared activated carbon from pine sawdust using steam activation and reported an enhanced adsorption capacity [102,103]. Although the surface area was slightly reduced, the steam activation seemed to enhance the adsorption of the heavy metals. In different study, Valentín-Reyes et al. [104] investigated chemically activated carbon with a high surface area for the removal of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) from water. Changing the surface chemistry during the activation process was proposed by the authors as the reason for enhancing the adsorption mechanism. A significant number of studies have been conducted on evaluating the adsorption capacity of different agricultural-waste-based nano-activated carbon on the adsorption of heavy metals (Table 2).

5.4. Oil Spill Separation

Large oil spills are a major environmental problem that occurs as a result of accidents caused by either human error or natural calamities. These oil spills have a significantly toxic and harmful impact on different environmental eco-systems, which eventually will affect human health [113]. In recent years, activated carbon has been investigated to solve oil spill issues. Shokry et al. [114] developed nano-magnetic activated carbon from waste biomass (hyacinth roots) for facile oil spill separation by using an external magnetic field. The authors reported that the original biomass exhibited only a 2.2 g oil /g oil spill adsorption affinity compared with their modified nano-magnetic activated carbon that showed a 30.2 g oil/g adsorption affinity after one hour of placing 1 g of their activated carbon in one litter. The authors were also able to easily separate the magnetic nano-activated carbon from treatment media by using an external magnetic field.
Although great advances have been made, the commercialization of cost-effective, reusable and eco-friendly sorbents for oil separation is yet to be achieved on a large-scale level [115]. Hammouda et al. [116] developed an efficient and eco-friendly magnetic activated carbon from plant biomass for oil spill applications. The authors coated magnetic nanoparticles with activated carbon and then made a soybean oil and stearic acid surface decoration. This modification made the magnetic fabricated composite possess an excellent amphiphilicity and a great adsorption capacity to a range of oils. In a different study, coconut-shell-based nano-activated carbon was incorporated with iron oxide nanoparticles and investigated in an oil spill treatment experiment [117]. The authors reported an excellent and fast oil retention capacity, with facile recovery by using an external magnetic field. The cost effectiveness of agricultural-waste-based nano-activated carbon and their whole fabrication and treatment processes in the required bulk quantities suggest great advances for these adsorbents in oil removal applications.

5.5. Removal of Toxins and Pharmaceutical Compounds

Several environmental toxins are highly abundant in eco-systems as a result of natural and/or anthropogenic processes [118]. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are one of these toxins that are released from the burning of coal, vehicle emissions and the burning of biofuels and biomass [119]. These toxins exhibit a highly hydrophobic nature, making them difficult to biodegrade, and thus they enter the food chain through either polluted air, sand and/or water [120]. To solve this issue, Inbaraj et al. [121] developed nano-activated carbon from green tea leaf waste. The authors evaluated their nano-activated carbon for the adsorption of four priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and they reported that, owing to the unique spherically shaped and cubic spinel structure of the nano particles, the surface area was found to be 118.8 m2/g. The adsorption capacity of these nano particles for the four priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ranged from 19.14 to 28.08 mg/g. The same authors also applied their nano-activated carbon to mineral water, tap and river water, resulting in up to an 89% removal of these toxins from mineral water and complete removal from tap and river water. In a different study, different agricultural wastes were used to prepare activated carbon fibers for the removal of cyanobacteria toxins (microcystins) from drinking water [122]. The authors were able to remove more than 98% of the toxin after only 10 min of contact time by using sugar-cane-bagasse- and pine-wood-based activated carbon fibers. Nano-activated carbon has also been used to eliminate toxic herbicides as a cost-effective, easy and effective technique. Rambabu et al. [123] developed nano-activated carbon from date-palm coir (DPC) waste via an easy and single-step carbonization and chemical activation process for the elimination of a highly toxic 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicide. The nano-activated carbon exhibited a graphitic structure and a flaky morphology, with a particle size and surface area of 163 nm and 947 m2/g, respectively (Figure 8). The authors were able to remove more than 98.6% of the herbicide from the contaminated water with a small dosage of nano-activated carbon. The same authors evaluated the economic value of their nano-activated carbon and stated that the economic value of the nano-activated carbon was $3/kg, and it could be reused without any significant loss in the adsorption capacity. Such an economic analysis supports our hypothesis that agricultural-waste-based nano-activated carbon can be the future of wastewater treatment applications.

6. Conclusions and Perspectives

Different agricultural wastes can lead to serious environmental and health problems depending on their type and source. The proper management and utilization of agricultural waste can have positive impacts on the environment in terms of reducing both the waste and removing pollution from water bodies. The fabrication of nano-activated carbon from such sustainable resources has several advantages apart from their potential adverse impacts. Agricultural wastes are extremely low cost and eco-friendly, which can reduce the overall cost of the production process of wastewater treatment systems. This is meaningful, as the price of these systems and of activated carbon in particular have both increased over time. Among the two activation approaches of activated carbon, physical activation is more time consuming than chemical activation, which could slightly increase the cost in addition to the difficulties in controlling the pore size and porosity of the nano-activated carbon particles. Thus, chemical activation and modification has become more prevalent. Activated carbon, due to its current cost of manufacturing, will remain the most prominent carbon-based water filtration material for the time being, with chemical modifications being used to improve the capture capacity and efficiency, thereby maintaining its relevance. As the cost of fabricating carbon nanotubes and graphene are reduced, it is highly likely that these carbon nanomaterials will be developed into advanced filtration devices or as additional components to a broad spectrum of nano-activated carbon devices used to capture specific contaminants. Ighalo et al. [124] stated that the cost of the adsorbent material used could vary depending on the method of activation employed, with chemical activation being more expensive than physical activation. Other factors can also affect the cost, including industrial-grade precursors, the chemicals used in any stage of preparation, adsorption capacity, selectivity, operational cost and the adsorbent degradation rate [125,126,127]. These factors should be taken into consideration before any attempt at large-scale production of the adsorption materials. The modification of nano-activated carbon allows these advanced adsorbents to specifically target the desired pollutants even in tiny amounts, which is highly beneficial in drinking water treatment applications. The future of water treatment will witness the high utilization of nano-activated carbon-based filters and treatment systems to eliminate toxic and undesired compounds. The activation, modification and application of nano-activated carbon are increasingly being developing every day, and the near future will witness the development of high-performance nano-activated carbon that is able to generally adsorb most wastewater pollutants with a reasonable cost of production.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M., H.P.S.A.K. and E.B.Y.; validation, Y.M.A. and A.B.S.; investigation, E.B.Y.; resources, S.M. and H.P.S.A.K.; data curation, A.A.A. and S.A.H.; writing—original draft preparation, E.B.Y.; writing—review and editing, E.B.Y. and H.P.S.A.K.; visualization, A.M. and S.K.; supervision, H.P.S.A.K.; project administration, S.M. and H.P.S.A.K.; funding acquisition, Y.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by an External Research Grant, grant number (304/PTEKIND/6501194.A158) and partially funded by LPPM-Universitas Syiah Kuala.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the collaboration between Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia and Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia that made this work possible. In addition, thanks to Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM) Universitas Syiah Kuala for supporting this work and providing the required resources.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Koul, B.; Yakoob, M.; Shah, M.P. Agricultural waste management strategies for environmental sustainability. Environ. Res. 2022, 206, 112285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, F.; Cheng, Z.; Reisner, A.; Liu, Y. Compliance with household solid waste management in rural villages in developing countries. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 202, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Raheja, S.; Obaidat, M.S.; Kumar, M.; Sadoun, B.; Bhushan, S. A hybrid MCDM framework and simulation analysis for the assessment of worst polluted cities. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2022, 118, 102540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nasution, H.; Yahya, E.B.; Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Shaah, M.A.; Suriani, A.; Mohamed, A.; Alfatah, T.; Abdullah, C. Extraction and Isolation of Cellulose Nanofibers from Carpet Wastes Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Approach. Polymers 2022, 14, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khounani, Z.; Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H.; Moustakas, K.; Talebi, A.F.; Goli, S.A.H.; Rajaeifar, M.A.; Khoshnevisan, B.; Jouzani, G.S.; Peng, W.; Kim, K.-H. Environmental life cycle assessment of different biorefinery platforms valorizing olive wastes to biofuel, phosphate salts, natural antioxidant, and an oxygenated fuel additive (triacetin). J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 123916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rizal, S.; Olaiya, F.G.; Saharudin, N.; Abdullah, C.; NG, O.; Mohamad Haafiz, M.; Yahya, E.B.; Sabaruddin, F.; Abdul Khalil, H.P.S. Isolation of textile waste cellulose nanofibrillated fibre reinforced in polylactic acid-chitin biodegradable composite for green packaging application. Polymers 2021, 13, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Azamzam, A.A.; Rafatullah, M.; Yahya, E.B.; Ahmad, M.I.; Lalung, J.; Alharthi, S.; Alosaimi, A.M.; Hussein, M.A. Insights into Solar Disinfection Enhancements for Drinking Water Treatment Applications. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Masilompane, T.M.; Tutu, H.; Etale, A. Cellulose-Based Nanomaterials for Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage-Contaminated Waters. In Application of Nanotechnology in Mining Processes: Beneficiation and Sustainability; Wiley-Scrivener: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 33–66. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim, S.; Nam, S.-N.; Jang, A.; Jang, M.; Park, C.M.; Son, A.; Her, N.; Heo, J.; Yoon, Y. Review of adsorption–membrane hybrid systems for water and wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Panahi, Y.; Mellatyar, H.; Farshbaf, M.; Sabet, Z.; Fattahi, T.; Akbarzadehe, A. Biotechnological applications of nanomaterials for air pollution and water/wastewater treatment. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 15550–15558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mariana, M.; Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Mistar, E.; Yahya, E.B.; Alfatah, T.; Danish, M.; Amayreh, M. Recent advances in activated carbon modification techniques for enhanced heavy metal adsorption. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 43, 102221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Elkhalifa, S.; Al-Ansari, T.; Mackey, H.R.; McKay, G. Food waste to biochars through pyrolysis: A review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 144, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xiao, X.; Chen, B.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, L.; Schnoor, J.L. Insight into multiple and multilevel structures of biochars and their potential environmental applications: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 5027–5047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dai, Z.; Zhang, X.; Tang, C.; Muhammad, N.; Wu, J.; Brookes, P.C.; Xu, J. Potential role of biochars in decreasing soil acidification-a critical review. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 581, 601–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wan, Z.; Sun, Y.; Tsang, D.C.; Khan, E.; Yip, A.C.; Ng, Y.H.; Rinklebe, J.; Ok, Y.S. Customised fabrication of nitrogen-doped biochar for environmental and energy applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 401, 126136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ruan, X.; Sun, Y.; Du, W.; Tang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Doherty, W.; Frost, R.L.; Qian, G.; Tsang, D.C. Formation, characteristics, and applications of environmentally persistent free radicals in biochars: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 281, 457–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, J.; Wang, S. Preparation, modification and environmental application of biochar: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 227, 1002–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Heidarinejad, Z.; Dehghani, M.H.; Heidari, M.; Javedan, G.; Ali, I.; Sillanpää, M. Methods for preparation and activation of activated carbon: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020, 18, 393–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shafeeyan, M.S.; Daud, W.M.A.W.; Houshmand, A.; Shamiri, A. A review on surface modification of activated carbon for carbon dioxide adsorption. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2010, 89, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lakshmi, S.; Avti, P.K.; Hegde, G. Activated carbon nanoparticles from biowaste as new generation antimicrobial agents: A review. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2018, 16, 306–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Obi, F.; Ugwuishiwu, B.; Nwakaire, J. Agricultural waste concept, generation, utilization and management. Niger. J. Technol. 2016, 35, 957–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bhardwaj, A.; Kumar, M.; Alshehri, M.; Keshta, I.; Abugabah, A.; Sharma, S.K. Smart water management framework for irrigation in agriculture. Environ. Technol. 2022, 18, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rizal, S.; Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Oyekanmi, A.A.; Gideon, O.N.; Abdullah, C.K.; Yahya, E.B.; Alfatah, T.; Sabaruddin, F.A.; Rahman, A.A. Cotton Wastes Functionalized Biomaterials from Micro to Nano: A Cleaner Approach for a Sustainable Environmental Application. Polymers 2021, 13, 1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Alsharef, A.; Aggarwal, K.; Kumar, M.; Mishra, A. Review of ML and AutoML solutions to forecast time-series data. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2022, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zabed, H.; Sahu, J.; Boyce, A.N.; Faruq, G. Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: An overview on feedstocks and technological approaches. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 66, 751–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jin, Z.; Shah, T.; Zhang, L.; Liu, H.; Peng, S.; Nie, L. Effect of straw returning on soil organic carbon in rice–wheat rotation system: A review. Food Energy Secur. 2020, 9, e200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kumar, P.; Singh, R.K. Selection of sustainable solutions for crop residue burning: An environmental issue in northwestern states of India. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 3696–3730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, X.; Yang, Z.; Liu, X.; Huang, G.; Xiao, W.; Han, L. Characteristics and Non-parametric Multivariate Data Mining Analysis and Comparison of Extensively Diversified Animal Manure. Waste Biomass Valorization 2021, 12, 2343–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, J.; Qiao, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, B.; Wang, Z.; Yu, Y.; Xu, M. Effect of torrefaction on physicochemical properties and steam gasification reactivity of chars produced from the pyrolysis of typical food wastes. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 15332–15342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, X.; Kong, L.; Song, G.; Chen, D. Adsorption of uranium onto modified rice straw grafted with oxygen-containing groups. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2016, 33, 942–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nam, H.; Choi, W.; Genuino, D.A.; Capareda, S.C. Development of rice straw activated carbon and its utilizations. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 5221–5229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xu, J.; Zong, M.-H.; Fu, S.-Y.; Li, N. Correlation between physicochemical properties and enzymatic digestibility of rice straw pretreated with cholinium ionic liquids. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 4340–4345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, L.; Chen, K.; He, L.; Peng, L. Reinforcement of the bio-gas conversion from pyrolysis of wheat straw by hot caustic pre-extraction. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Topcu, N.S.; Duman, G.; Olgun, H.; Yanik, J. Evaluation of Poultry Manure: Combination of Phosphorus Recovery and Activated Carbon Production. ACS Omega 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Holm-Nielsen, J.B.; Al Seadi, T.; Oleskowicz-Popiel, P. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 5478–5484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cantrell, K.B.; Ducey, T.; Ro, K.S.; Hunt, P.G. Livestock waste-to-bioenergy generation opportunities. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 7941–7953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tsai, W.-T.; Huang, P.-C.; Lin, Y.-Q. Reusing cow manure for the production of activated carbon using potassium hydroxide (KOH) activation process and its liquid-phase adsorption performance. Processes 2019, 7, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Cao, H.; Xin, Y.; Yuan, Q. Prediction of biochar yield from cattle manure pyrolysis via least squares support vector machine intelligent approach. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 202, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pattanaik, L.; Pattnaik, F.; Saxena, D.K.; Naik, S.N. Biofuels from agricultural wastes. In Second and Third Generation of Feedstocks; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 103–142. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sukiran, M.A.; Abnisa, F.; Daud, W.M.A.W.; Bakar, N.A.; Loh, S.K. A review of torrefaction of oil palm solid wastes for biofuel production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 149, 101–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guo, Y.; Tan, C.; Sun, J.; Li, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, C. Porous activated carbons derived from waste sugarcane bagasse for CO2 adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 381, 122736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jaramillo-Martínez, D.; Buitrago-Sierra, R.; López, D. Use of Palm Oil Waste for Activated Carbons Production and Its Application in Methylene Blue Removal. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7, e202200791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Akinwole, A.; Dauda, A.; Ololade, O. Growth performance of african catfish (Clarias gariepinus) juveniles reared in wastewater treated with alum and Moringa oleifera seed. J. Aquac. Res. Dev. 2016, 7, 1000460. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ferreira, C.I.; Calisto, V.; Otero, M.; Nadais, H.; Esteves, V.I. Comparative adsorption evaluation of biochars from paper mill sludge with commercial activated carbon for the removal of fish anaesthetics from water in Recirculating Aquaculture Systems. Aquac. Eng. 2016, 74, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dauda, A.B.; Ajadi, A.; Tola-Fabunmi, A.S.; Akinwole, A.O. Waste production in aquaculture: Sources, components and managements in different culture systems. Aquac. Fish. 2019, 4, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Omoniyi, T.; Salami, H. Yield, characterization and potential application of activated carbon produced from Co–Pyrolysis of wood and plastic wastes as adsorbent for aquaculture wastewater treatment. In Proceedings of the 12th CIGR Section VI International Symposium, Ibadan, Nigeria, 22–25 October 2018; p. 25. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yang, H.; Yu, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, L.; Guo, M. Preparation of magnetic Fe3O4/activated carbon fiber and a study of the tetracycline adsorption in aquaculture wastewater. Mater. Technol. 2019, 53, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ramírez-Montoya, L.A.; Hernández-Montoya, V.; Montes-Morán, M.A.; Cervantes, F.J. Correlation between mesopore volume of carbon supports and the immobilization of laccase from Trametes versicolor for the decolorization of Acid Orange 7. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 162, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Om Prakash, M.; Gujjala, R.; Panchal, M.; Ojha, S. Mechanical characterization of arhar biomass based porous nano activated carbon polymer composites. Polym. Compos. 2020, 41, 3113–3123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhou, J.; Luo, A.; Zhao, Y. Preparation and characterisation of activated carbon from waste tea by physical activation using steam. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2018, 68, 1269–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mariana, M.; Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Yahya, E.B.; Olaiya, N.; Alfatah, T.; Suriani, A.; Mohamed, A. Recent trends and future prospects of nanostructured aerogels in water treatment applications. J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 45, 102481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Williams, P.T.; Reed, A.R. Development of activated carbon pore structure via physical and chemical activation of biomass fibre waste. Biomass Bioenergy 2006, 30, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gan, Y.X. Activated carbon from biomass sustainable sources. C 2021, 7, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jahanban-Esfahlan, A.; Jahanban-Esfahlan, R.; Tabibiazar, M.; Roufegarinejad, L.; Amarowicz, R. Recent advances in the use of walnut (Juglans regia L.) shell as a valuable plant-based bio-sorbent for the removal of hazardous materials. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 7026–7047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Danish, M.; Pin, Z.; Ziyang, L.; Ahmad, T.; Majeed, S.; Yahya, A.N.A.; Khanday, W.A.; Abdul Khalil, H.P.S. Preparation and characterization of banana trunk activated carbon using H3PO4 activation: A rotatable central composite design approach. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022, 282, 125989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lam, S.S.; Su, M.H.; Nam, W.L.; Thoo, D.S.; Ng, C.M.; Liew, R.K.; Yuh Yek, P.N.; Ma, N.L.; Nguyen Vo, D.V. Microwave pyrolysis with steam activation in producing activated carbon for removal of herbicides in agricultural surface water. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 58, 695–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shan, Y.; Yang, W.; Li, Y.; Chen, H.; Liu, Y. Removal of elemental mercury from flue gas using microwave/ultrasound-activated Ce–Fe magnetic porous carbon derived from biomass straw. Energy Fuels 2019, 33, 8394–8402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tuerhong, T.; Kuerban, Z. Preparation and characterization of cattle manure-based activated carbon for hydrogen sulfide removal at room temperature. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jawad, A.H.; Bardhan, M.; Islam, M.A.; Islam, M.A.; Syed-Hassan, S.S.A.; Surip, S.; ALOthman, Z.A.; Khan, M.R. Insights into the modeling, characterization and adsorption performance of mesoporous activated carbon from corn cob residue via microwave-assisted H3PO4 activation. Surf. Interfaces 2020, 21, 100688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhao, Y.; Fang, F.; Xiao, H.-M.; Feng, Q.-P.; Xiong, L.-Y.; Fu, S.-Y. Preparation of pore-size controllable activated carbon fibers from bamboo fibers with superior performance for xenon storage. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 270, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Guo, J.; Song, Y.; Ji, X.; Ji, L.; Cai, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Song, W. Preparation and characterization of nanoporous activated carbon derived from prawn shell and its application for removal of heavy metal ions. Materials 2019, 12, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Mohammad, S.G.; Ahmed, S.M.; Amr, A.E.-G.E.; Kamel, A.H. Porous activated carbon from lignocellulosic agricultural waste for the removal of acetampirid pesticide from aqueous solutions. Molecules 2020, 25, 2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sharma, A.; Jindal, J.; Mittal, A.; Kumari, K.; Maken, S.; Kumar, N. Carbon materials as CO2 adsorbents: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 875–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Prabu, D.; Kumar, P.S.; Rathi, B.S.; Sathish, S.; Anand, K.V.; Kumar, J.A.; Mohammed, O.B.; Silambarasan, P. Feasibility of magnetic nano adsorbent impregnated with activated carbon from animal bone waste: Application for the chromium (VI) removal. Environ. Res. 2022, 203, 111813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Legrouri, K.; Khouya, E.; Hannache, H.; El Hartti, M.; Ezzine, M.; Naslain, R. Activated carbon from molasses efficiency for Cr (VI), Pb (II) and Cu (II) adsorption: A mechanistic study. Chem. Int 2017, 3, 301. [Google Scholar]
  66. Guo, X.; Chen, F. Removal of arsenic by bead cellulose loaded with iron oxyhydroxide from groundwater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 6808–6818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhu, H.; Jia, Y.; Wu, X.; Wang, H. Removal of arsenic from water by supported nano zero-valent iron on activated carbon. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172, 1591–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, B.; Yin, W.; Xu, M.; Tan, X.; Li, P.; Gu, J.; Chiang, P.; Wu, J. Facile modification of activated carbon with highly dispersed nano-sized α-Fe2O3 for enhanced removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 2019, 224, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Khalil, A.M.; Eljamal, O.; Amen, T.W.; Sugihara, Y.; Matsunaga, N. Optimized nano-scale zero-valent iron supported on treated activated carbon for enhanced nitrate and phosphate removal from water. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 309, 349–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sabermahani, F.; Mahani, N.M.; Noraldiny, M. Removal of thallium (I) by activated carbon prepared from apricot nucleus shell and modified with rhodamine B. Toxin Rev. 2017, 36, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Deng, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, S.; Zeng, G.; Tan, X.; Huang, B.; Tang, X.; Wang, S.; Hua, Q.; Yan, Z. Competitive adsorption of Pb (II), Cd (II) and Cu (II) onto chitosan-pyromellitic dianhydride modified biochar. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 506, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhou, Y.; Gao, B.; Zimmerman, A.R.; Fang, J.; Sun, Y.; Cao, X. Sorption of heavy metals on chitosan-modified biochars and its biological effects. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 231, 512–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tang, J.; Lv, H.; Gong, Y.; Huang, Y. Preparation and characterization of a novel graphene/biochar composite for aqueous phenanthrene and mercury removal. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 196, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shang, M.-R.; Liu, Y.-G.; Liu, S.-B.; Zeng, G.-M.; Tan, X.-F.; Jiang, L.-H.; Huang, X.-X.; Ding, Y.; Guo, Y.-M.; Wang, S.-F. A novel graphene oxide coated biochar composite: Synthesis, characterization and application for Cr (VI) removal. Rsc Adv. 2016, 6, 85202–85212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Patra, C.; Gupta, R.; Bedadeep, D.; Narayanasamy, S. Surface treated acid-activated carbon for adsorption of anionic azo dyes from single and binary adsorptive systems: A detail insight. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 266, 115102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Acevedo, S.; Giraldo, L.; Moreno-Piraján, J.C. Adsorption of CO2 on activated carbons prepared by chemical activation with cupric nitrate. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 10423–10432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Huang, Y.; Peng, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, G.; Chen, J.Y.; Yu, G. Biobased nano porous active carbon fibers for high-performance supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 15205–15215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Abuzalat, O.; Wong, D.; Elsayed, M.A. Nano-porous composites of activated carbon–metal organic frameworks (Fe-BDC@ AC) for rapid removal of Cr (VI): Synthesis, adsorption, mechanism, and kinetics studies. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2022, 32, 1924–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jain, M.; Yadav, M.; Kohout, T.; Lahtinen, M.; Garg, V.K.; Sillanpää, M. Development of iron oxide/activated carbon nanoparticle composite for the removal of Cr (VI), Cu (II) and Cd (II) ions from aqueous solution. Water Resour. Ind. 2018, 20, 54–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Reçber, Z.B.; Burhan, H.; Bayat, R.; Nas, M.S.; Calimli, M.H.; Demirbas, Ö.; Şen, F.; Hassan, K.-M. Fabrication of activated carbon supported modified with bimetallic-platin ruthenium nano sorbent for removal of azo dye from aqueous media using enhanced ultrasonic wave. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 302, 119033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Deng, J.; Li, B.; Yin, W.; Bu, H.; Yang, B.; Li, P.; Zheng, X.; Wu, J. Enhanced bacterial inactivation by activated carbon modified with nano-sized silver oxides: Performance and mechanism. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 311, 114884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yahya, E.B.; Jummaat, F.; Amirul, A.; Adnan, A.; Olaiya, N.; Abdullah, C.; Rizal, S.; Mohamad Haafiz, M.; Abdul Khalil, H.P.S. A review on revolutionary natural biopolymer-based aerogels for antibacterial delivery. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Cao, Y.; Xiao, W.; Shen, G.; Ji, G.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, C.; Han, L. Carbonization and ball milling on the enhancement of Pb (II) adsorption by wheat straw: Competitive effects of ion exchange and precipitation. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 273, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jia, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, J.; Yuan, L.; Li, Z.; Liu, C.; Zhao, D.; Wang, X. A novel magnetic biochar/MgFe-layered double hydroxides composite removing Pb2+ from aqueous solution: Isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 567, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Huang, D.; Liu, C.; Zhang, C.; Deng, R.; Wang, R.; Xue, W.; Luo, H.; Zeng, G.; Zhang, Q.; Guo, X. Cr (VI) removal from aqueous solution using biochar modified with Mg/Al-layered double hydroxide intercalated with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 276, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lin, P.; Wu, J.; Ahn, J.; Lee, J. Adsorption characteristics of Cd (II) and Ni (II) from aqueous solution using succinylated hay. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2019, 26, 1239–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Liang, S.; Shi, S.; Zhang, H.; Qiu, J.; Yu, W.; Li, M.; Gan, Q.; Yu, W.; Xiao, K.; Liu, B. One-pot solvothermal synthesis of magnetic biochar from waste biomass: Formation mechanism and efficient adsorption of Cr (VI) in an aqueous solution. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 695, 133886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gupta, S.; Sireesha, S.; Sreedhar, I.; Patel, C.M.; Anitha, K. Latest trends in heavy metal removal from wastewater by biochar based sorbents. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 38, 101561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Panchal, M.; Minugu, O.P.; Gujjala, R.; Ojha, S.; Mallampati Chowdary, S.; Mohammad, A. Study of environmental behavior and its effect on solid particle erosion behavior of hierarchical porous activated carbon-epoxy composite. Polym. Compos. 2022, 43, 2276–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Xiong, B.; Zydney, A.L.; Kumar, M. Fouling of microfiltration membranes by flowback and produced waters from the Marcellus shale gas play. Water Res. 2016, 99, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Okonji, S.O.; Yu, L.; Dominic, J.A.; Pernitsky, D.; Achari, G. Adsorption by granular activated carbon and nano zerovalent iron from wastewater: A study on removal of selenomethionine and selenocysteine. Water 2020, 13, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Largitte, L.; Pasquier, R. A review of the kinetics adsorption models and their application to the adsorption of lead by an activated carbon. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2016, 109, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Arenas, L.R.; Gentile, S.R.; Zimmermann, S.; Stoll, S. Nanoplastics adsorption and removal efficiency by granular activated carbon used in drinking water treatment process. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 791, 148175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Altmann, J.; Rehfeld, D.; Träder, K.; Sperlich, A.; Jekel, M. Combination of granular activated carbon adsorption and deep-bed filtration as a single advanced wastewater treatment step for organic micropollutant and phosphorus removal. Water Res. 2016, 92, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Shindhal, T.; Rakholiya, P.; Varjani, S.; Pandey, A.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.; Ng, H.Y.; Taherzadeh, M.J. A critical review on advances in the practices and perspectives for the treatment of dye industry wastewater. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 70–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ambika, S.; Kumar, M.; Pisharody, L.; Malhotra, M.; Kumar, G.; Sreedharan, V.; Singh, L.; Nidheesh, P.; Bhatnagar, A. Modified biochar as a green adsorbent for removal of hexavalent chromium from various environmental matrices: Mechanisms, methods, and prospects. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 439, 135716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Shokry, H.; Elkady, M.; Hamad, H. Nano activated carbon from industrial mine coal as adsorbents for removal of dye from simulated textile wastewater: Operational parameters and mechanism study. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 4477–4488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mousavi, S.A.; Kamarehie, B.; Almasi, A.; Darvishmotevalli, M.; Salari, M.; Moradnia, M.; Azimi, F.; Ghaderpoori, M.; Neyazi, Z.; Karami, M.A. Removal of Rhodamine B from aqueous solution by stalk corn activated carbon: Adsorption and kinetic study. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Feiqiang, G.; Xiaolei, L.; Xiaochen, J.; Xingmin, Z.; Chenglong, G.; Zhonghao, R. Characteristics and toxic dye adsorption of magnetic activated carbon prepared from biomass waste by modified one-step synthesis. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 555, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Liu, X.; Tian, J.; Li, Y.; Sun, N.; Mi, S.; Xie, Y.; Chen, Z. Enhanced dyes adsorption from wastewater via Fe3O4 nanoparticles functionalized activated carbon. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 373, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Duan, C.; Ma, T.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Y. Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution using carbon-based adsorbents: A review. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 37, 101339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lou, K.; Rajapaksha, A.U.; Ok, Y.S.; Chang, S.X. Pyrolysis temperature and steam activation effects on sorption of phosphate on pine sawdust biochars in aqueous solutions. Chem. Speciat. Bioavailab. 2016, 28, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Kumar, M.; Xiong, X.; Wan, Z.; Sun, Y.; Tsang, D.C.; Gupta, J.; Gao, B.; Cao, X.; Tang, J.; Ok, Y.S. Ball milling as a mechanochemical technology for fabrication of novel biochar nanomaterials. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 312, 123613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Valentín-Reyes, J.; García-Reyes, R.; García-González, A.; Soto-Regalado, E.; Cerino-Córdova, F. Adsorption mechanisms of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions on modified activated carbons. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 236, 815–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zhang, X.; Gu, P.; Li, X.; Zhang, G. Efficient adsorption of radioactive iodide ion from simulated wastewater by nano Cu2O/Cu modified activated carbon. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 322, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wang, R.-Z.; Huang, D.-L.; Liu, Y.-G.; Zhang, C.; Lai, C.; Zeng, G.-M.; Cheng, M.; Gong, X.-M.; Wan, J.; Luo, H. Investigating the adsorption behavior and the relative distribution of Cd2+ sorption mechanisms on biochars by different feedstock. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 261, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mubarak, M.F.; Zayed, A.M.; Ahmed, H.A. Activated Carbon/Carborundum@ Microcrystalline Cellulose core shell nano-composite: Synthesis, characterization and application for heavy metals adsorption from aqueous solutions. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 182, 114896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zhang, Z.; Wang, T.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Xing, B. Adsorption of Pb (II) and Cd (II) by magnetic activated carbon and its mechanism. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 757, 143910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zabihi, M.; Omidvar, M.; Motavalizadehkakhky, A.; Zhiani, R. Competitive adsorption of arsenic and mercury on nano-magnetic activated carbons derived from hazelnut shell. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 39, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lee, M.-E.; Park, J.H.; Chung, J.W. Comparison of the lead and copper adsorption capacities of plant source materials and their biochars. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 236, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; He, Y.; Kong, D.; Klein, B.; Yin, S.; Zhao, H. Preparation of Magnetic Activated Carbon by Activation and Modification of Char Derived from Co-Pyrolysis of Lignite and Biomass and Its Adsorption of Heavy-Metal-Containing Wastewater. Minerals 2022, 12, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Park, J.-H.; Wang, J.J.; Kim, S.-H.; Kang, S.-W.; Jeong, C.Y.; Jeon, J.-R.; Park, K.H.; Cho, J.-S.; Delaune, R.D.; Seo, D.-C. Cadmium adsorption characteristics of biochars derived using various pine tree residues and pyrolysis temperatures. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 553, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Laffon, B.; Pásaro, E.; Valdiglesias, V. Effects of exposure to oil spills on human health: Updated review. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 2016, 19, 105–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Shokry, H.; Elkady, M.; Salama, E. Eco-friendly magnetic activated carbon nano-hybrid for facile oil spills separation. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kumar, M.; Xiong, X.; Sun, Y.; Yu, I.K.; Tsang, D.C.; Hou, D.; Gupta, J.; Bhaskar, T.; Pandey, A. Critical review on biochar-supported catalysts for pollutant degradation and sustainable biorefinery. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2020, 4, 1900149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ben Hammouda, S.; Chen, Z.; An, C.; Lee, K.; Zaker, A. Buoyant oleophilic magnetic activated carbon nanoparticles for oil spill cleanup. Clean. Chem. Eng. 2022, 2, 100028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Raj, K.G.; Joy, P.A. Coconut shell based activated carbon–iron oxide magnetic nanocomposite for fast and efficient removal of oil spills. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 2068–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bolan, N.; Hoang, S.A.; Beiyuan, J.; Gupta, S.; Hou, D.; Karakoti, A.; Joseph, S.; Jung, S.; Kim, K.-H.; Kirkham, M. Multifunctional applications of biochar beyond carbon storage. Int. Mater. Rev. 2022, 67, 150–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kao, T.H.; Chen, S.; Chen, C.J.; Huang, C.W.; Chen, B.H. Evaluation of analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by the QuEChERS method and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and their formation in poultry meat as affected by marinating and frying. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 1380–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Premnath, N.; Mohanrasu, K.; Rao, R.G.R.; Dinesh, G.; Prakash, G.S.; Ananthi, V.; Ponnuchamy, K.; Muthusamy, G.; Arun, A. A crucial review on polycyclic aromatic Hydrocarbons-Environmental occurrence and strategies for microbial degradation. Chemosphere 2021, 280, 130608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Inbaraj, B.S.; Sridhar, K.; Chen, B.-H. Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from water by magnetic activated carbon nanocomposite from green tea waste. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 415, 125701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Albuquerque Júnior, E.C.D.; Méndez, M.O.A.; Coutinho, A.D.R.; Franco, T.T. Removal of cyanobacteria toxins from drinking water by adsorption on activated carbon fibers. Mater. Res. 2008, 11, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Rambabu, K.; AlYammahi, J.; Bharath, G.; Thanigaivelan, A.; Sivarajasekar, N.; Banat, F. Nano-activated carbon derived from date palm coir waste for efficient sequestration of noxious 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicide. Chemosphere 2021, 282, 131103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ighalo, J.O.; Omoarukhe, F.O.; Ojukwu, V.E.; Iwuozor, K.O.; Igwegbe, C.A. Cost of adsorbent preparation and usage in wastewater treatment: A review. Clean. Chem. Eng. 2022, 3, 100042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Luo, W.; Xiao, G.; Tian, F.; Richardson, J.J.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Guo, J.; Liao, X.; Shi, B. Engineering robust metal–phenolic network membranes for uranium extraction from seawater. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Yadav, A.K.; Yadav, H.K.; Naz, A.; Koul, M.; Chowdhury, A.; Shekhar, S. Arsenic removal technologies for middle-and low-income countries to achieve the SDG-3 and SDG-6 targets: A review. Environ. Adv. 2022, 9, 100262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Sawalha, H.; Bader, A.; Sarsour, J.; Al-Jabari, M.; Rene, E.R. Removal of Dye (Methylene Blue) from Wastewater Using Bio-Char Derived from Agricultural Residues in Palestine: Performance and Isotherm Analysis. Processes 2022, 10, 2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Illustration of different sources of agricultural waste categories.
Figure 1. Illustration of different sources of agricultural waste categories.
Agriculture 12 01737 g001
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of agricultural-waste-based nano-activated carbon fabrication.
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of agricultural-waste-based nano-activated carbon fabrication.
Agriculture 12 01737 g002
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of textile and surface chemistry modification of nano-scale zero-valent/activated carbon for the removal of nitrate and phosphate from water. The graphs show the removal efficiency of both nitrate and phosphate alone and combining together. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [69], 2017, Elsevier.
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of textile and surface chemistry modification of nano-scale zero-valent/activated carbon for the removal of nitrate and phosphate from water. The graphs show the removal efficiency of both nitrate and phosphate alone and combining together. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [69], 2017, Elsevier.
Agriculture 12 01737 g003
Figure 4. Illustration of sunflower-head-waste-based nano-activated carbon; (a) scanning electron microscope images at different magnifications, (b) effect of temperature on the adsorption, and (c) schematic drawing of adsorption process of heavy metals. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [79], 2018, Elsevier.
Figure 4. Illustration of sunflower-head-waste-based nano-activated carbon; (a) scanning electron microscope images at different magnifications, (b) effect of temperature on the adsorption, and (c) schematic drawing of adsorption process of heavy metals. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [79], 2018, Elsevier.
Agriculture 12 01737 g004
Figure 5. Modified activated carbon for water disinfection; (a) schematic illustration of the fabrication process, (b) SEM images showing the pore size and silver nanoparticles attachments and (c) the sterilization mechanism of modified activated carbon. Reprinted with permission from Ref [81], 2022, Elsevier.
Figure 5. Modified activated carbon for water disinfection; (a) schematic illustration of the fabrication process, (b) SEM images showing the pore size and silver nanoparticles attachments and (c) the sterilization mechanism of modified activated carbon. Reprinted with permission from Ref [81], 2022, Elsevier.
Agriculture 12 01737 g005
Figure 6. Granular activated carbon-based drinking water filters: (a) the adsorption and removal of polystyrene nano plastics, and (b) the removal of suspended solids and phosphorus from drinking water. Adapted with permission from ref. [93], 2021, Elsevier (a), and [94], 2016, Elsevier (b).
Figure 6. Granular activated carbon-based drinking water filters: (a) the adsorption and removal of polystyrene nano plastics, and (b) the removal of suspended solids and phosphorus from drinking water. Adapted with permission from ref. [93], 2021, Elsevier (a), and [94], 2016, Elsevier (b).
Agriculture 12 01737 g006
Figure 7. Schematic drawing of using magnetic activated carbon in dye removal; (a) the application of Fe3O4/AC sample for removing rhodamine B and methyl orange from the aqueous solution, and (b) the adsorption mechanism. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [100], 2019, Elsevier.
Figure 7. Schematic drawing of using magnetic activated carbon in dye removal; (a) the application of Fe3O4/AC sample for removing rhodamine B and methyl orange from the aqueous solution, and (b) the adsorption mechanism. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [100], 2019, Elsevier.
Agriculture 12 01737 g007
Figure 8. Schematic illustration of nano-activated carbon prepared from date-palm coir waste and its usage in toxic herbicide removal. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [123], 2021, Elsevier.
Figure 8. Schematic illustration of nano-activated carbon prepared from date-palm coir waste and its usage in toxic herbicide removal. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [123], 2021, Elsevier.
Agriculture 12 01737 g008
Table 1. Comparison of the functional properties of using different activation approaches for activated carbon preparation.
Table 1. Comparison of the functional properties of using different activation approaches for activated carbon preparation.
Type of ActivationPrecursor MaterialPyrolysis ConditionsActivation AgentRemoving MaterialAdsorption CapacityReference
Physical activationPalm kernel shells700 W for 30 minSteamHerbicides11 mg/g[56]
Biomass straw600 °C for 20 min Microwave and ultrasoundElemental mercury7.23 mg/g[57]
Cattle manure850 °C for 60 min CO2Hydrogen sulfide868.45 mg/g[58]
Corn cob residue600 W for 20 minMicrowave and H3PO4Organic dyes183.3 mg/g[59]
Bamboo900 °C for 120 min Steam and thermalXenon 158.49 g/g[60]
Chemical activationPrawn shells800 °C for 180 minKOH and HClHeavy metals560 mg/g[61]
Pistachio shells1000 °C for 240 minCaHPO4Organic dyes-[48]
Lignocellulosic waste500 °C for 120 minH3PO4Pesticide35.7 mg/g[62]
Cashew nut shells500 °C for 120 minZnCl2Dyes476 mg/g[63]
Animal bone waste600 °C for 120 minOrthophosphoric acidHeavy metals27.86 mg/g[64]
Molasses500 °C for 120 minH3PO4Organic dyes625 mg/g[65]
Table 2. Illustration of studies presenting the adsorption capacity of different agricultural-waste-based nano-activated carbon.
Table 2. Illustration of studies presenting the adsorption capacity of different agricultural-waste-based nano-activated carbon.
Agricultural WastePyrolysis ConditionType of MetalSurface Area (m2/g)Maximum Adsorption (mg/g)Reference
Coconut shellCommercial I−122041.2[105]
Bamboo waste700 °C for 2 hCd(II)6.7973.45[106]
Pig manure700 °C for 2 hCd(II)11.3777.34[106]
Kenaf core fiber400 °C for 1 hAs (III)1031422.9[107]
Rape straw300 °C for 2 hPb(II)699.9253.2[108]
Hazelnut shell700 °C for 2 hHg-80.0[109]
Gingko leaf400 °C for 1.5 hCu(II)310.0059.90[110]
Lignite and poplar leaves600 °C for 0.5 hPb(II)805.8610.55[111]
Pine tree residue600 °C for 4 hCd(II)N.A85.8[112]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Muhammad, S.; Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Abd Hamid, S.; Albadn, Y.M.; Suriani, A.B.; Kamaruzzaman, S.; Mohamed, A.; Allaq, A.A.; Yahya, E.B. Insights into Agricultural-Waste-Based Nano-Activated Carbon Fabrication and Modifications for Wastewater Treatment Application. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1737. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101737

AMA Style

Muhammad S, Abdul Khalil HPS, Abd Hamid S, Albadn YM, Suriani AB, Kamaruzzaman S, Mohamed A, Allaq AA, Yahya EB. Insights into Agricultural-Waste-Based Nano-Activated Carbon Fabrication and Modifications for Wastewater Treatment Application. Agriculture. 2022; 12(10):1737. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101737

Chicago/Turabian Style

Muhammad, Syaifullah, H. P. S. Abdul Khalil, Shazlina Abd Hamid, Yonss M. Albadn, A. B. Suriani, Suraiya Kamaruzzaman, Azmi Mohamed, Abdulmutalib A. Allaq, and Esam Bashir Yahya. 2022. "Insights into Agricultural-Waste-Based Nano-Activated Carbon Fabrication and Modifications for Wastewater Treatment Application" Agriculture 12, no. 10: 1737. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101737

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop