Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Enzyme Activity on Carbon Sequestration and the Cycle of Available Macro- (P, K, Mg) and Microelements (Zn, Cu) in Phaeozems
Next Article in Special Issue
OsHSP 17.9, a Small Heat Shock Protein, Confers Improved Productivity and Tolerance to High Temperature and Salinity in a Natural Paddy Field in Transgenic Rice Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Rice Plaque Detection and Identification Based on an Improved Convolutional Neural Network
Previous Article in Special Issue
Graphical and Numerical Analysis of the Components of Gene Effect on the Quality Traits of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Varying Environmental Conditions
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Use of Graphical and Numerical Approaches for Diallel Analysis of Grain Yield and Its Attributes in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Varying Environmental Conditions

Agriculture 2023, 13(1), 171; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13010171
by Gita R. Chaudhari 1,*, D. A. Patel 1, A. D. Kalola 2 and Sushil Kumar 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Agriculture 2023, 13(1), 171; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13010171
Submission received: 15 November 2022 / Revised: 26 December 2022 / Accepted: 5 January 2023 / Published: 9 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genomics and Breeding: Field and Horticultural Crop Perspective)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report (Previous Reviewer 3)

Dear Authors, Though you have done some corrections, the manuscript still needs major changes in writing to make it understandable to the readers. The aim and novel aspects of the research should be clearly mentioned. The discussion must be rearranged in light of the previous studies. Please thoroughly work on the manuscript.

Author Response

  Sr. No.

Comment

Response/Action

 

General comments

 

1

Dear Authors, Though you have done some corrections, the manuscript still needs major changes in writing to make it understandable to the readers. The aim and novel aspects of the research should be clearly mentioned. The discussion must be rearranged in light of the previous studies. Please thoroughly work on the manuscript.

Accepted and Added.

See Abstract and discussion.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report (Previous Reviewer 2)

Dear Authors, 

see attach document. 

Best regards,

VP

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Reviewer 2

 

Sr. No.

Comments

Response/Action

1

Dear Authors,

see attach document.

Best regards,

VP

Thanks for good comments

 Point 1:

2.

 1/In In the first sentence in Abstract, delete the brackets in line 27 .... ( )

Abstract: Line 27 - A given population may be improved to isolate superior recombinants for the development of desired parents in future breeding programs.

Accepted and corrected

 

 Point 2:

 

3

 2/ in parts 2.1. Plant material and field performance evaluation in line 100 Indicate which dose of irrigation was applied, at which time, and in which phase of the vegetation of the plants.

Line 100: Immediately after sowing, need based supplementary surface irrigation

was provided

Accepted and Provided in supplementary table 2.

Please checked supplementary table 2.

 

 Point 3

 

4

 3/ In results in line 181 delete

Line 181: Components of gene effect and related parameters have been presented and discussed for the characters with a non-significant ‘t2 182 ’ estimate of uniformity of the Wr-Vr value (Table 3 and 4).

Accepted and deleted

 

Point 4

 

5.

 4/ Add citate in page 5 line 124 Environmental influence is an important factor affecting yield potential, especially

temperature and precipitation. Understanding the interaction between Envirioment and Genotype and Environmental conditions and nutrition are a prerequisite for the improvement of the wheat crop [27-29].

Added and cited.

Check references 27-29.

 

Point 5

 

6.

 5/Conclusions in line 130 and 133 please delete Therefore, Therefore, population improvement may be followed to isolate superior recombinants for the development of desired parent/s in fu- 131 ture breeding programs in all tested environments. Grain yield per plant was influenced 132 by over dominance gene effect. Therefore, while selecting segregants for improvement of 133 yield attributing traits, selection may be delayed by the time dominance will be diluted 134 and transgressive segregants could be identified. 6/ Add reference 60-63 in Literature 27-29

Deleted and corrected.

Checked conclusions

 

 Add Reference

 

 

1. Ljubičić N., Popović V., Ćirić V., Kostić M., Ivošević B., Popović D., Pandžić M., El Musafah Seddiq, Janković S. (2021): Multivariate Interaction Analysis of Winter Wheat Grown in Environment of Limited Soil Conditions. Plants–Basel. 10, 3: 604; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10030604

2. Popovic V., Ljubičić N., Kostić M., Radulović M., Blagojević D., Ugrenovic V., Popovic D., Ivosevic B. (2020): Genotype x Environment Interaction for Wheat Yield Traits Suitable for Selection in Different Seed Priming Conditions. Plants. 9, 12, 1804; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9121804

3. Glamočlija Đ., Popović V., Markoski M., Janković S., Ikanović J., Lončarević V., Strugar V., Bačkonja B. Climatic change effect on wheat production "Biotechnology and modern approach in growing and breeding plants". Smederevskaj Palanka, 03.11.2022, to the Institute for Vegetable Growing. ISBN 978-86-89177-05-3, 2022, 212-223.

Please adopt suggestions for improvement. Thanks. After the adopted suggestions,

the paper can be accepted for publication.

 Added reference 27-29.

Checked referances.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report (Previous Reviewer 1)

Typing mistakes and extra spacing still exist in the manuscript. Carefully check the units and formula used. Check the level of significance used in the Tables. Quality of the figures can be improved. Also check the reference list and remove irrelevant references from the list.

Author Response

Reviewer 3

 

Sr. No.

Comments

Response/Action

Q 1

1

Typing mistakes and extra spacing still exist in the manuscript. Carefully check the units and formula used. Check the level of significance used in the Tables. Quality of the figures can be improved. Also check the reference list and remove irrelevant references from the list.

 

My manuscript English grammar checked by one co-author and he is editor of this special issue.

Figures also give in different format.

Add references as per suggestions of Reviewer 2. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report (Previous Reviewer 3)

.

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.


Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors,

I suggest minor correction in the paper. Please adopt suggestion in order to improve paper. 

Best regards,

VP  

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Chaudhari et al. have reported the effect of environments on the genotypes crossed in half-diallel fashion. Though the research appears fine, the manuscript needs to be rewritten in order to make it understandable to the readers. English language and lack of clarity in writing are the two main issues. The aim, future prospects, and novel aspects of the research should be clearly mentioned. The discussion must be rearranged in light of the previous studies. Though the manuscript is not ready to be published in its present form, it can be resubmitted once the authors work on the suggestions to improve the quality of the manuscript. 

Back to TopTop