Diet Influence on Sperm Quality, Fertility, and Reproductive Behavior in Karakul of Botoșani Rams
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ethical Approval
2.2. The Research Area and Climatological Conditions
2.3. Animal, General Procedures, and Data Management
2.3.1. General Conditions of the Study
2.3.2. Body Condition Score and the Behavior Evaluation
2.4. Semen Analysis
2.4.1. Scrotal Circumference (SC)
2.4.2. Ejaculate Volume, Color, and pH
2.4.3. The Evaluation of Specific Characteristics of Semen
2.4.4. Assessment of Blood Testosterone Level
2.5. Statistical Data Processing
3. Results
3.1. Effect of Feed Used on Live Weight (LW) and Body Condition Score (BCS) of Rams
3.2. Physical Evaluation of Reproductive Quality
3.3. Sperm Quality Analyses: Concentration, Live Spermatozoa, Abnormal Spermatozoa, Mobility, Testosterone
3.4. Behavior Type and Fertility of Rams
3.5. The Effect of the VM Supplement on Economic Indicators
4. Discussions
4.1. Live Weight (LW) and Body Condition Score (BCS)
4.2. The Quality of Sperm
4.3. Male Sexual Behavior and Fertility of Rams
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Oldham, C.M.; Adams, N.R.; Gherardi, P.B.; Lindsay, D.R.; MacKintosh, J.B. The influence of level of feed intake on sperm-producing capacity of testicular tissue in the ram. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1978, 29, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Florea, A.M.; Nechifor, I.; Crîșmaru, A.; Pascal, C. Researches regarding weight evolution considering the young female mating’s age. Sci. Pap. Ser. D-Anim. Sci. 2021, 6, 281–286. [Google Scholar]
- Braden, A.W.H.; Turnbull, K.E.; Mattner, P.E.; Maule, G.R. Effect of protein and energy content of the diet on the rate of sperm production in rams. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1974, 27, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nechifor, I.; Florea, A.M.; Radu Rusu, R.M.; Pascal, C. Influence of supplemental feeding on body condition score and reproductive performance dynamics in Botosani Karakul Sheep. Agriculture 2022, 12, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Florea, A.M.; Nechifor, I.; Crîșmaru, A.; Pascal, C. Influence of some external factors on specific characteristics of seminal material for Karakul de Botoșani breed rams. Sci. Pap. Ser. D-Anim. Sci. 2021, 64, 247–252. [Google Scholar]
- Page, C.M.; Van Emon, M.L.; Murphy, T.W.; Larson, C.K.; Berardinelli, J.G.; McGregor, I.R.; Taylor, J.B.; Stewart, W.C. Effects of zinc source and dietary concentration on serum zinc concentrations, growth performance, wool and reproductive characteristics in developing rams. Animal 2020, 14, 520–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pascal, C.; Ivancia, M.; Gherasim, N. The influence of some factors on the reproductive function of Romanian local sheep. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 2008, 43, 99. [Google Scholar]
- Balaro, M.F.A.; Cosentino, O.I.; Ribeiro, A.C.S.; Brandão, F.Z. Ultrasound diagnosis in small ruminants: Occurrence and description of genital pathologies. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gouletsou, P.G.; Fthenakis, G.C. Clinical evaluation of reproductive ability of rams. Small Rumin. Res. 2010, 92, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pascal, C. Treaty for Sheep and Goat Breeding; Ion Ionescu de la Brad Publishing House: Iași, Romania, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Maquivar, M.G.; Smith, S.M.; Busboom, J.R. Reproductive management of rams and ram lambs during the pre-breeding season in us sheep farms. Animals 2021, 11, 2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sejian, V.; Bhatta, R.; Goughan, J.; Malik, P.K.; Naqvi, S.M.K.; Lal, R. Adapting Sheep Production to Climate Change; Springer: Singapore, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casella, S.; Giudice, E.; Passantino, A.M.; Zumbo, A.; Di Pietro, S.; Piccione, G. Shearing induces secondary biomarkers responses of thermal stress in sheep. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2016, 34, 73–80. [Google Scholar]
- Wojtas, K.; Cwynar, P.; Kołacz, R. Effect of thermal stress on physiological and blood parameters in Merino sheep. J. Vet. Res. 2014, 58, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sierra, A.B.; Avendaño, R.L.; Hernández, R.J.A.; Pérez, R.V.; Calderón, A.C.; Mellado, M.; Cesar, A.; Herrera, M.; Cruz, U.M. Thermoregulation and reproductive responses of rams under heat stress. Review. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Pec. 2021, 12, 910–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hjollunda, N.H.I.; Storgaard, L.; Ernst, E.; Bondea, J.P.; Olsen, J. The relation between daily activities and scrotal temperature. Reprod. Toxicol. 2002, 16, 209–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramón, M.; Salces, J.O.; González, C.; Pérez-Guzmán, D.M.; Garde, J.J.; Álvarez, O.G.; Morales, A.M.; Calvo, J.H.; Serrano, M.M. Influence of the temperature and the genotype of the HSP90AA1 gene over sperm chromatin stability in Manchega rams. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jefferies, B.C. Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasman. J. Agric. 1961, 32, 19–21. [Google Scholar]
- Goshme, S.; Banerjee, S.; Rekik, M.; Haile, H.; Yitagesu, E.; Getachew, T. Evaluation and characterization of semen quality in rams of Menz, Dorper and Awassi crosses in different seasons in Ethiopia. Livest. Res. Rural. Dev. 2020, 32, 180. Available online: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd32/11/shenk32180.html (accessed on 18 July 2023).
- Jha, P.K.; Paul, A.K.; Rahman, M.B.; Tanjim, M.; Bari, F.Y.; Golam, M. Improvement of preservation quality of chilled bull semen using α-tocopherol as an antioxidant. J. Emb. Trans. 2013, 28, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belkadi, S.; Safsaf, B.; Heleili, N.; Tlidjane, M.; Belkacem, L.; Oucheriah, Y. Seasonal influence of sperm parameters, scrotal measurements, and serum testosterone in Ouled Djellal breed rams in Algeria. Vet. World 2017, 10, 1486–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozioł, K.; Koziorowski, M. Steroid hormones in peripheral blood plasma and androgen receptors in testis and epididymis of roe deer male (Capreolus capreolus) during the reproduction season. Small Rumin. Res. 2013, 115, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsoukis, A.; Chronopoulou-Serelia, A.; Stratakos, G. Effect of seasonally changing aerial environment on testosterone in Karagouniko and Chios sheep. J. Anim. Behav. Biometeorol. 2022, 10, 2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelnour, S.A.; El-Hack, M.E.A.; Noreldin, A.E.; El-Saber Batiha, G.; Beshbishy, A.M.; Ohran, H.; Khafaga, A.F.; Alothman, S.; Allam, A.; Abdel-Aziz, S.A. High Salt Diet Affects the Reproductive Health in Animals: An Overview. Animals 2020, 10, 590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salamon, S.; Maxwell, W.M. Frozen storage of ram semen I. Processing, freezing, thawing and fertility after cervical insemination. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1995, 37, 185–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simeanu, D.; Radu Rusu, M.R. Animal Nutrition and Productions. Agriculture 2023, 13, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- To, F.; Rege, J.E.O.; Mukasa-Mugerwa, E.; Tembely, S.; Anindo, D.; Beker, R.L.; Lahlou-Kassi, A. Reproductive characteristics of Ethiopian highland sheep I. Genetic parameters of testicular measurements in ram lambs and relationship with age at puberty in ewe lambs. Small Rumin. Res. 2000, 36, 227–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jha, P.K.; Shahi Alam, G.M.; Al Mansur, A.; Islam, T.M.; Bari, F.Y. Selection of breeding rams by evaluating semen quality. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2018, 11, 9–20. [Google Scholar]
- Greyling, J.P.C.; Grobbelaar, J.A.N. Seasonal variation in semen quality of Boer and Angora goat rams using different collection techniques. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 1983, 13, 250–252. [Google Scholar]
- Hafez, E.S.E.; Hafez, B. Reproduction in Farm Animals, 7th ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Malejane, C.M.; Greyling, J.P.C.; Raito, M.B. Seasonal variation in semen quality of Dorper rams using different collection techniques. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 44, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pascal, C.; Gîlcă, I.; Radu Rusu, R.M.; Nacu, G. On the influence of certain natural factors on the sperm quality and sexual behaviour of rams. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. Int. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2010, 4, 307–310. [Google Scholar]
- Hechtman, L. Infertility, Male. In Textbook of Natural Medicine; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 1453–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purushotam, J.R. Review article—Nutrition and reproduction in sheep. Food Agribus. Manag. (FABM) 2022, 3, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmoud, G.B.; Abdel-Raheem, F.; Hussein, H.A. Effect of combination of vitamin E and selenium injections on reproductive performance and blood parameters of Ossimi rams. Small Rum. Res. 2013, 113, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ford, C.M. Some interactions of climate and mineral nutrition on the fertility of cattle in the Midland areas of Great Britain. VII. Int. Kongr. Tier. Fort. 1972, 3, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Jafarpour, N.; Khorvash, M.; Rahmani, R.H.; Pezeshki, A. Hosseini Ghaffari: Dose–responses of zinc–methionine supplements on growth, blood metabolites and gastrointestinal development in sheep. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2015, 99, 668–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bansal, A.K.; Bilaspuri, G.S. Antioxidant effect of vitamin E on mobility, viability and lipid peroxidation of cattle spermatozoa under oxidative stress. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2009, 27, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van de Hoek, M.; Rickeard, P.J.; de Graf, S.P. Mobility Assessment of Ram Spermatozoa. Biology 2022, 11, 1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, S.R.; Liu, Y.X. Regulation of spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal and spermatocyte meiosis by Sertoli cell signaling. J. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. 2015, 149, R159–R167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Casacao, A.; Cebrián, I.; Asumpção, M.E.; Pérez-Pé, R.; Abecia, J.A.; Forcada, F.; Cebrián-Pérez, J.A.; Muiño-Blanco, T. Seasonal variations of melatonin in ram seminal plasma are correlated to those of testosterone and antioxidant enzymes. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2010, 8, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pascal, C.; Ivancia, M.; Gilca, I.; Nacu, G. Research regarding the influence of natural factors on activity and reproductive behaviour at rams. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2009, 44, 119. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, P.; Yadav, B.; Yadav, S. Effect of zinc and selenium supplementation on antioxidative status of seminal plasma and testosterone, T4 and T3 level in goat blood serum. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2013, 41, 382–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dietary Ingredients (kg) | Diet for L1 | Diet for L2 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rest during Summer | Rest during Winter | Preparation for Mating | Mating | Rest during Summer | Rest during Winter | Preparation for Mating | Mating | |
Alfalfa hay | - | 0.410 | 0.210 | - | - | 0.410 | 0.210 | - |
Barley straw | 1.430 | 1.610 | 1.340 | 1.420 | 1.430 | 1.610 | 1.340 | 1.420 |
Hillside pasture | 2.400 | - | - | 2.800 | 2.400 | - | - | 2.800 |
Carrots | - | - | - | 0.200 | - | - | - | 0.200 |
Barley | 0.095 | 0.060 | - | - | 0.095 | 0.060 | - | - |
Oat | - | - | 0.530 | 0.100 | - | - | 0.530 | 0.100 |
Corn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
VMP | - | - | - | - | 0.014 | 0.019 | 0.017 | 0.023 |
Nutritional characterization | ||||||||
DM (g) | 1786 | 1781 | 1783 | 1777 | 1800 | 1800 | 1800 | 1800 |
CP (g) | 124.87 | 120.00 | 132.00 | 144.71 | 124.87 | 120.00 | 132.00 | 144.71 |
ME-ruminants (MJ) | 13.00 | 12.99 | 14.64 | 14.64 | 13.00 | 12.99 | 14.64 | 14.64 |
NEM (MJ) | 7.30 | 7.30 | 8.42 | 8.47 | 7.30 | 7.30 | 8.42 | 8.47 |
Ca (g) | 9.33 | 14.16 | 9.81 | 10.54 | 9.33 | 14.16 | 9.81 | 10.54 |
P (g) | 3.20 | 3.00 | 3.53 | 3.72 | 3.20 | 3.00 | 3.53 | 3.72 |
Na (g) | 5.73 | 6.58 | 5.42 | 6.49 | 5.73 | 6.58 | 5.42 | 6.49 |
Mg (g) | 2.50 | 2.86 | 2.61 | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.86 | 2.61 | 2.50 |
Vit.A (IE) | - | - | - | - | 8595 | 11036 | 10940 | 14121 |
Vit.D (IE) | - | - | - | - | 1029 | 1346 | 1273 | 1687 |
Vit.E (mg) | - | - | - | - | 39.00 | 46.00 | 55.00 | 65.00 |
Zn (mg) | - | - | - | - | 62.84 | 82.37 | 77.60 | 103.05 |
Fe (mg) | - | - | - | - | 80.00 | 104.44 | 99.48 | 131.29 |
Mn (mg) | - | - | - | - | 47.45 | 66.97 | 51.81 | 77.26 |
Cu (mg) | - | - | - | - | 10.50 | 14.40 | 12.05 | 17.14 |
Co (mg) | - | - | - | - | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.33 |
I (mg) | - | - | - | - | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.98 | 1.11 |
Se (mg) | - | - | - | - | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.42 |
Assessment Moment | Trait | L1 | L2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | ±St. Dev | CV% | Mean | ±St. Dev | CV% | ||
Preparation for mating (MP) | BCS (points) | 2.50 | 0.42 | 16.80 | 2.70 | 0.32 | 11.85 |
LW (kg) | 87.49 | 2.39 | 2.73 | 87.92 | 2.31 | 2.63 | |
Start mating (SM) | BCS (points) | 2.83 | 0.56 | 19.79 | 3.23 | 0.53 | 16.41 |
LW (kg) | 89.09 | 2.91 | 3.27 | 90.49 | 2.42 | 2.67 | |
End of mating (EM) | BCS (points) | 2.33 a | 0.41 | 17.60 | 2.70 b | 0.49 | 18.15 |
LW (kg) | 86.06 a | 2.16 | 2.51 | 90.13 d | 2.19 | 2.43 |
Assessment Moment | Trait | L1 | L2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | ±St. Dev | CV% | Mean | ±St. Dev | CV% | ||
Preparation for mating (MP) | SC (cm) | 31.45 | 1.56 | 4.96 | 31.25 | 1.76 | 5.63 |
Ev (mL) | 1.20 | 0.10 | 8.33 | 1.25 | 0.09 | 7.20 | |
Color (1–5 degrees) | 2.733 | 0.594 | 6.57 | 2.867 | 0.516 | 8.14 | |
pH | 7.033 | 0.188 | 7.31 | 7.027 | 0.166 | 8.14 | |
Start of mating (SM) | SC (cm) | 33.8 a | 1.83 | 5.40 | 35.42 b | 1.72 | 4.01 |
Ev (mL) | 1.30 a | 0.11 | 8.46 | 1.58 d | 0.24 | 11.19 | |
Color (1–5 degrees) | 2.846 a | 0.520 | 9.22 | 3.867 d | 0.352 | 8.31 | |
pH | 7.058 | 0.085 | 9.23 | 7.100 | 0.093 | 8.38 | |
End of mating (EM) | SC (cm) | 32.10 a | 1.80 | 5.61 | 34.71 d | 1.34 | 3.86 |
Ev (mL) | 1.32 a | 0.18 | 13.64 | 1.47 b | 0.20 | 13.61 | |
Color (1–5 degrees) | 2.733 a | 0.458 | 10.24 | 3.267 d | 0.458 | 9.01 | |
pH | 7.020 | 0.094 | 10.24 | 7.060 | 0.074 | 9.05 |
Assessment Moment | Characteristic | L1 | L2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | ±St. Dev | CV% | Mean | ±St. Dev | CV% | ||
Mount preparation (MP) | Sperm concentration (×109/mL) | 3.98 | 0.08 | 2.01 | 4.01 | 0.08 | 2.00 |
Live spermatozoa (%) | 80.53 | 2.29 | 2.84 | 80.73 | 1.10 | 1.36 | |
Abnormal spermatozoa (%) | 3.70 | 0.15 | 4.05 | 3.78 | 0.10 | 2.65 | |
Mobility (%) | 83.87 | 5.05 | 6.02 | 85.20 | 4.07 | 4.78 | |
Testosterone (ng/mL) | 2.29 | 0.09 | 3.39 | 2.31 | 0.27 | 11.69 | |
Start mounting (SM) | Sperm concentration (×109/mL) | 4.13 a | 0.17 | 4.12 | 4.41 d | 0.13 | 2.95 |
Live spermatozoa (%) | 81.87 a | 1.77 | 2.16 | 87.80 d | 1.93 | 2.20 | |
Abnormal spermatozoa (%) | 3.59 | 0.12 | 3.34 | 3.53 | 0.16 | 4.53 | |
Mobility (%) | 85.93 a | 4.40 | 5.12 | 88.87 b | 2.29 | 2.58 | |
Testosterone (ng/mL) | 2.47 a | 0.11 | 4.45 | 3.18 d | 0.27 | 8.49 | |
End of mating (EM) | Sperm concentration (×109/mL) | 3.46 a | 0.20 | 5.78 | 3.87 d | 0.19 | 4.91 |
Live spermatozoa (%) | 79.60 | 0.99 | 1.24 | 81.67 | 2.26 | 2.77 | |
Abnormal spermatozoa (%) | 3.82 a | 0.12 | 3.14 | 3.57 c | 0.06 | 2.68 | |
Mobility (%) | 85.13 a | 2.61 | 3.07 | 88.20 c | 2.01 | 2.28 | |
Testosterone (ng/mL) | 2.45 | 0.13 | 5.31 | 2.68 | 0.13 | 4.85 |
Manifested Behavior | Grade | L1 | L2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | ||
Excellent—Typical behavior; eager to breed upon introduction into the testing pen, restless, challenging to restrain, showing an immediate desire to mate. | 5 | 3 | 20.00 | 9 | 60.00 |
Very good—Optimal sexual reflexes, the ram shows a desire to breed within a maximum of 3 min, although it can be challenging to restrain. | 4 | 6 | 40.00 | 4 | 26.66 |
Good—Upon introduction to the pen, the ram sniffs around, breeding occurs within the first 5 min, and it is relatively easy to control. | 3 | 4 | 26.66 | 2 | 13.34 |
Poor—Sniffs the ewe for a few minutes, the time taken for breeding extends, the ram is more docile, and easier to handle. | 2 | 2 | 13.34 | 0 | 0 |
Very poor—Displays delayed and incomplete reflexes, mounting time extends to approximately 10 min. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 15 | 100 | 15 | 100 | |
Statistical data (Mean ± Stdev) | 3.66 a ± 0.95 | 4.46 b ± 0.55 |
Pregnant Ewes | Lambs Obtained | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Batch | Mean | ±St. Dev | CV% | % of Mounted Ewes | Mean | ±St. Dev | CV% |
L1 | 29.29 a | 2.29 | 7.78 | 83.69 | 29.41 a | 2.24 | 6.46 |
L2 | 32.59 d | 1.78 | 5.57 | 93.10 | 33.53 d | 1.67 | 5.15 |
Economic Indicators | Measure Unit | L1 | L2 | The Difference between Groups | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
± | % | ||||
Fertilized ewes | n | 440 | 489 | 49 | +10.02 |
Obtained lambs | n | 441 | 502 | 61 | +12.15 |
Costs/ram/day | € | 3.25 | 3.36 | 0.11 | +3.27 |
Costs/ram/year | € | 1186.25 | 1264.40 | 78.15 | +6.18 |
Income from lambs | € | 33,075 | 37,650 | 4575 | +13.8 |
Income per ram | € | 2205 | 2510 | 305 | +13.8 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pascal, C.; Nechifor, I.; Florea, M.A.; Pânzaru, C.; Simeanu, D.; Mierliță, D. Diet Influence on Sperm Quality, Fertility, and Reproductive Behavior in Karakul of Botoșani Rams. Agriculture 2023, 13, 2168. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112168
Pascal C, Nechifor I, Florea MA, Pânzaru C, Simeanu D, Mierliță D. Diet Influence on Sperm Quality, Fertility, and Reproductive Behavior in Karakul of Botoșani Rams. Agriculture. 2023; 13(11):2168. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112168
Chicago/Turabian StylePascal, Constantin, Ionică Nechifor, Marian Alexandru Florea, Claudia Pânzaru, Daniel Simeanu, and Daniel Mierliță. 2023. "Diet Influence on Sperm Quality, Fertility, and Reproductive Behavior in Karakul of Botoșani Rams" Agriculture 13, no. 11: 2168. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112168
APA StylePascal, C., Nechifor, I., Florea, M. A., Pânzaru, C., Simeanu, D., & Mierliță, D. (2023). Diet Influence on Sperm Quality, Fertility, and Reproductive Behavior in Karakul of Botoșani Rams. Agriculture, 13(11), 2168. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112168