Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Efficacy of the Fermentation Formula of Bacillus velezensis Strain Tcb43 in Controlling Cucumber Powdery Mildew
Next Article in Special Issue
Production of Late Seedlings of Açai (Euterpe oleraceae) in an Aquaponic System with Tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum, Curvier, 1818)
Previous Article in Journal
Improved Organic Fertilisers Made from Combinations of Compost, Biochar, and Anaerobic Digestate: Evaluation of Maize Growth and Soil Metrics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Consumer Preferences in the Purchase of Agri-Food Products: Implications for the Development of Family Farms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Application of Agri-Food By-Products in the Food Industry

by
Roxana Nicoleta Rațu
1,
Ionuț Dumitru Veleșcu
1,
Florina Stoica
2,
Alexandru Usturoi
3,
Vlad Nicolae Arsenoaia
2,*,
Ioana Cristina Crivei
4,
Alina Narcisa Postolache
5,
Florin Daniel Lipșa
1,
Feodor Filipov
2,
Andreea Mihaela Florea
6,
Mihai Alexandru Chițea
7 and
Ioan Sebastian Brumă
8
1
Department of Food Technologies, Faculty of Agriculture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” University of Life Sciences, 3 Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700489 Iasi, Romania
2
Department of Pedotechnics, Faculty of Agriculture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” University of Life Sciences, 3 Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700489 Iasi, Romania
3
Department of Control, Expertise and Services, Faculty of Food and Animal Sciences, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” University of Life Sciences, 8 Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700489 Iasi, Romania
4
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” University of Life Sciences, 6 Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700449 Iasi, Romania
5
Research and Development Station for Cattle Breeding Dancu, 9 Iași-Ungheni, 707252 Iasi, Romania
6
Department of Plant Science, Faculty of Agriculture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” University of Life Sciences, 3 Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700489 Iasi, Romania
7
Institute of Agricultural Economics, 13 September, No. 13, Sector 5, 050711 Bucharest, Romania
8
Academy of Romanian Scientists, Ilfov 3, 050044 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2023, 13(8), 1559; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081559
Submission received: 30 June 2023 / Revised: 31 July 2023 / Accepted: 1 August 2023 / Published: 4 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Rural Development and Agri-Food Systems)

Abstract

:
Every year, the global food industry produces a significant number of wastes and by-products from a variety of sources. By-products from the food-processing sector are produced in large quantities, and because of their undesirable qualities, they are frequently wasted, losing important resources. In order to pursue a circular economy that refers to waste reduction and effective waste management, by-products valorization recently received increased interest. By-products are rich in bioactive compounds and can be used in various industrial applications for health promotion and nutritional benefits. A novel step in its sustainable application is the use of these inexpensive waste agri-food by-products to create the value-added products. The present review intended to summarize the different types of agro-industrial by-products and their properties and highlight their nutritional composition and potential health benefits. Applications of agri-food by-products in foods as well as the potential health and sustainability implications of by-products in food products were also covered. According to research, agri-food by-products can be added to a variety of food to increase their bioactive profile, fiber content, and antioxidant capacity while maintaining good sensory acceptability. Overall, the sustainability of the agri-food chain and consumer health can both benefit from the use of agri-food by-products in food formulation.

1. Introduction

Taking into consideration global environmental concerns and resource scarcity, the food industry is increasingly becoming aware of the importance of sustainable practices and reducing waste. It gained significant attention that agri-food by-products are valuable resources with an untapped potential that were once viewed as waste materials.
The European Union (EU) established an action plan to eliminate food waste, using a circular economy as a method [1]. It involves a strong emphasis on reducing, reusing, recovering, and recycling materials and energy in order to raise the value of goods, materials, and resources, and extending their economic usable life. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [2] emphasizes the importance of reducing carbon footprint in sustainable agriculture. Reducing agriculture’s carbon footprint is a top priority, with sustainable practices such as precision agriculture, organic farming, and enhanced management of manure playing a crucial role in combating climate change. In addition, studies have shown that low-value agri-food wastes, co-products, and by-products enhance soil quality in a variety of ways and are essential for closing the nutrient loop [3].
Agri-food by-products, which are generated during the various phases of agricultural and food processing operations, contain numerous nutritional, functional, and bioactive components, which can be used to develop innovative food products, reduce waste, and improve the overall sustainability of our food systems [4].
Several studies recently highlighted the fact that agriculture-food by-products have a huge potential to be used in a variety of food applications, such as utilizing them for obtaining bioactive compounds, developing alternatives for livestock feed, and using them in new food formulations. Due to the abundance of proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, micronutrients, bioactive substances, and dietary fibers in this situation, food wastes and by-products are of utmost relevance [5,6,7].
There has been a great deal of interest in efficient agri-food by-product utilization in recent years because it is capable of enhancing sustainability, minimizing waste disposal, and creating value-added products within the food industry. There has been considerable interest among researchers and industry professionals, as well as policymakers in this field as a result, which led to a significant increase in scientific investigations and technological advancements. The food industry can become more environmentally friendly and resource-efficient by adopting a circular economy approach, which can end up turning underutilized by-products into valuable ingredients, functional additives, and feed sources, by adopting a circular economy framework [8].
Many studies highlighted in the past few years that agri-food by-products have immense potential to be used in diverse food applications, such as the extraction of bioactive compounds, developing alternative feed sources for livestock, and utilizing them in innovative food formulations [4,9,10,11,12]. In spite of this, there are still several challenges relating to technological limitations, consumer acceptance, marketability, and regulatory constraints, even though interest is growing. Achieving sustainable food systems requires harnessing the potential of agri-food by-products in order to make the food system more resource efficient and sustainable. Figure 1 provides an overview of some of the prospective applications of high added-value compounds derived from agri-food wastes and by-products in the food and healthcare industries, as well as some of the technical issues that need to be considered for those applications to be carried out effectively.
In order to capitalize on these opportunities, the food industry can contribute significantly to waste reduction, environmental protection, and the creation of innovative and sustainable food products through taking advantage of these opportunities [13,14].
Figure 1. Interaction of waste fruit and vegetable matrices for the purpose of environmental remediation [15,16,17].
Figure 1. Interaction of waste fruit and vegetable matrices for the purpose of environmental remediation [15,16,17].
Agriculture 13 01559 g001
This review highlights and summarizes the current literature pertaining to the different types of by-products the nutritional composition of agri-food by-products, the potential health benefits, waste management approaches, and the development of functional foods. The enhancement of nutritional and functional attributes of by-product-based value-added products has been discussed in detail.

2. Agri-Food By-Products and Their Properties

Worldwide, the agri-food industry produces over 190 million tons of by-products each year [18]. Damaged raw materials, pomaces, leaves, seeds, shells, brans, oilseed cakes, molasses, and other by-products of the processing process are examples. The disposal, recycling, or waste management of these is extremely important. However, the majority of these food by-products may be valued for profit depending on their nature and amount [19].
Plant-based by-products have a high nutritional value in terms of carbohydrates, proteins, phytochemicals, and/or antioxidants when compared to other agro-industrial residues. The two primary categories of agro-industrial by-products are agricultural and industrial. Field residues and process residues are additional categories for agricultural residues. Field residues are by-products from the crop harvesting process that remain in the field. While the process residues are still present even after the crop is processed into another useful resource, the field residues are made up of leaves, stems, seedpods, and stalks. Molasses, bagasse, husks, seeds, leaves, straw, stems, stalks, shells, pulp, peels, roots, and other substances make up these wastes, which are utilized for making fertilizers, animal feed, manufacturing, and several other purposes. Every year, the food processing sectors, including the juice, chips, meat, confectionery, fruit, and vegetable industries, produce a significant quantity of organic wastes and associated effluents [20].
Pulp, peel, seeds, skin, pomace, husks, pods, and stems are examples of by-products produced in the fruit and vegetable industry that represent the majority of the agri-food by-products. Fruit and vegetable by-products, which is easily generated in large quantities can be recovered and used as value-added products. All of these by-products have considerable levels of dietary fiber and bioactive compounds (polyphenols, carotenoids, glucosinolates, etc.) in their basic composition. Because of this, the food sector may find it appealing to valorize by-products in order to produce components with nutritious value [21].
Researchers are looking for new uses for these by-products because of this, as well as the growing concern of representatives to encourage the change of the food system through a sustainable production model and the implementation of more sustainable lifestyles by consumers. The studies concentrated on the application of circular economy models, which reintroduce by-products as new products into production chains [22].
Proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, and other bioactive components like phenolics, dietary fibers, alkaloids, and pigments are present in substantial amounts in a number of agri-food by-products. The recovery of valuable compounds from vast quantities of by-products can have an influence on the economy, environment, and sustainability of food worldwide. Utilizing large-scale manufactured plant-based food by-products is economical for industry, needs less waste disposal, and expands the range of products available, such as functional foods and the development of high value-added compounds. The food industry and researchers are looking for new ways to evaluate plant-based food by-products in light of these benefits [23].

2.1. Some Examples of Agri-Food By-Products

Agro-industrial by-products are produced at all points along the food supply chain, including during agricultural production, processing, and distribution. They are primarily made up of seeds, peels, stems, leaves, and useless pulp from fruit and other vegetable sources. Food waste is also produced simultaneously, and a specific by-product can be recognized as well as wasted food, such as fruit pulp that is discarded from a final product but is otherwise suitable for consumption. Up to 42% of it occurs within the household, 39% in the food manufacturing sector, 14% in the food service industry (restaurants and ready-to-eat food), and 5% during delivery [24].
One of the most popular commodities consumed worldwide is fruit and vegetables, which make up more than 44% of all food waste. Instead of being thrown away, by-products can be utilized as functional food additives, specifically for formulations that are rich in antioxidants. As a by-product of the pomegranate juice and concentrate industries, pomegranate peels and seeds offer a variety of medicinal and nutraceutical benefits. The oil extracted from pomegranate seed waste contains significant levels of dietary fiber and conjugated fatty acids [25].
Apple by-products, such as seeds and peels, account for around 25–30% of the weight of the initial fresh fruit and are utilized as food ingredients. Apple pomace is a waste or by-product of the processing of apple fruit. It contains a higher percentage of total dietary fiber (74%), as well as functional qualities (swelling capacity, water and oil holding capacity, density). Apple pomace is a significant source of healthy bioactive compounds, such as flavonoids, phenolic acids, flavanols, anthocyanins, dihydrochalcones triterpenoids, minerals, and carbohydrates (pectin and pectin oligosaccharides [26]. The most significant parts in apple pomace are cellulose and hemicelluloses, which make up 43% and 20–32%, respectively [27]. Additionally, apple by-products contain phenolics, which are mostly found in the seed and peel as chlorogenic acid and phloridzin. According to Rabetafika et al. [27], their composition includes anthocyanins (cyanidin-3-galactosides) and flavanols (epicatechin and catechin).
Depending on the variety, processing techniques, and growth conditions, 1–10% of the seeds, 60–65% of the peel, and 30–35% of internal tissues (juice sac residues and rag) from processed citrus fruits were discarded from the total by-products. These fractions represent 50–70% of the processed fruit [28]. The fiber content of orange pomace was mostly high, and these fibers were well suited for products that needed better water/oil holding and binding capabilities, such as a high-water hydration capacity. Pectin is an essential component recovered from the peel that is often extracted using nitric acid and utilized mostly as a gelling agent. With a high dietary fiber content (40.47%), low fat level (2.14%), and a high mineral content, it had a beneficial nutritional makeup [29].
Grapes are a popular fruit that are consumed practically everywhere in the world. Winemaking or vinification accounts for about 50% of the world’s grape production. Pomace (skins, stems, and leftover pulp) and grape seed, which makes up over 20% of the original grape weight, are the principal by-products of wine manufacturing [30]. By-products of wine production are a cheap source for developing of dietary supplements and contain a variety of biomolecules (dietary fibers, lipids, proteins, and natural antioxidants and phenolic compounds). Although many important fractions and components can be extracted from grape pomace and other winemaking by-products, the majority of studies focused on phenolic compounds. Phenolic acids, monomeric and polymeric flavanols (proanthocyanidins), and flavanols, as well as anthocyanins in the case of press residues from red grape varieties, are the main types of polyphenols found in grape pomace. Another main by-product is grape seed, which has many bioactive ingredients as stilbene, tannins, gallic acid, resveratrol, catechinalate, and rutin [31]. Anthocyanins from red grape pomace have a long history of use in food preparation, and these extracts are permitted as food additives. In addition, because resveratrol, procyanidins, and anthocyanins are thought to have positive effects on human health, extracts or fractions of these compounds have been employed in dietary supplements. The production of ethanol [32], recovery of dietary fiber [33], production of grape seed oil and pomace oil [34], and other uses for grape pomace have all been reported.
Many industrial by-products are produced during the processing of bananas, including peels, sheaths, stems, leaves, rhizomes, and inflorescence. Banana peels are a great source of carotenoids, phenolic compounds, dietary fibers, and other phytochemicals with strong antioxidant potential. Approximately 35–40% of the mass of a banana is made up of the fruit’s main by-product, banana peel. The phenolic chemicals, dietary fiber, and antimicrobial, antibacterial, and antioxidant capabilities found in banana peel are in high amounts in banana peel [35]. Banana peel contains vitamins (vitamins C and A), trace minerals (iron and zinc), and macro minerals (potassium, calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium). The peel contains about 50% fiber and is a major source of pectin, which produces gels that are used as emulsifiers [36].
Depending on the variety and size, processing mango fruit into various value-added products results in enormous waste products, of which peels make up 12–16%, seeds make up 10–25%, and kernels make up 15–20% [37]. Mango peels constitute 10–20% of the mango fruit’s overall weight, are the primary by-product of industrial utilization, and are consumed raw. Bioactives, like vitamin C, β-carotene, polyphenols, and dietary fiber are abundant in mango by-products [38]. Due to their high concentration of bioactive substances with useful and medicinal qualities, such as polyphenols, kaempferol, catechins, quercetin, gallic acid, mangiferin, and benzoic acid, mango peels recently caught the attention of scientists. Although mango seed kernels are high in necessary amino acids, they are deficient in proteins. Additionally, it is a good source of phytosterols, tocopherols, and polyphenols. Mango seeds have potential as functional ingredients since they naturally contain antibacterial and antioxidant properties. The oil from mango seed kernels is particularly beneficial; it has a ratio of 52–56% unsaturated to 44–48% saturated fatty acids [39]. A notable source of phenolic acids, flavanols, and anthocyanins, which are all known for their bioactivities as antibacterial and antioxidant substances, is plum pomace [40].
The primary purpose of using the by-products from the processing of vegetables like tomatoes, onions, and carrots is to recover secondary plant metabolites and high-molecular-mass components from the plant cell wall. According to Valle et al. [41], the tomato pomace, which is made up of the peels and seeds, contains about 60% fiber, 25% total sugars, 20% proteins, 8% pectin, 6% total fat, and 4% minerals. The extraction of carotenoids, particularly lycopene, from tomato pomace has been the subject of numerous investigations. Lycopene is gaining popularity due to its capacity to fight cardiovascular illnesses, as well as its antioxidant and carcinoprotective characteristics. Additionally, tomato pomace includes a substantial amount of carbohydrates, particularly glucose and fructose, and is high in fiber, primarily insoluble fiber [42].
Investigations on the by-products of industrial onion processing focused on recovering phenolic substances and dietary fiber. According to reports, the onion skin is abundant in total phenolics, flavonoid, flavonol, quercetin, aglycone, fructans, and alk(en)yl cystein sulphoxides, and it also has anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antispasmodic, and anti-diabetic properties. Benitez et al. [43] evaluated the effects of pasteurization and sterilization on the stability of important compounds and demonstrated that these side streams represent a source of dietary fiber, fructans, and alk(en)yl cysteine sulfoxides. According to Perez-Gregorio et al. [44], quercetin glycosides predominate among the polyphenols found in onions and their by-products. A rich source of α-carotene and β-carotene is carrot pomace, a by-product of the manufacture of carrot juice. With a soluble-to-insoluble fiber ratio of 1:4, the fiber fraction is the most prevalent in carrot pomace, as it is in other by-products. The presence of carotenoids in carrot pomace, particularly β-carotene and phenolics, makes it particularly important [45].
Beetroots are used to make processed foods like juice, pickles, and ready-to-eat meals. Peels and pomace, which are produced as waste, can be used to extract high-value nutraceuticals or bioactive components. According to Vulic et al. [46], beetroot pomace extract contains phenolic acids, flavonoids, and betalains that have strong antioxidant and hepatoprotective properties.
A by-product of many industrial potato operations, peels, are a common occurrence among other wastes as potato by-products. Due to its high concentration of phenolic compounds with known health-promoting effects, potato peel is a rich source of bioactive compounds mainly phenolic acids and glycoalkaloids [47]. Due to their ability to induce cytotoxicity and apoptosis in several cancer cell lines, potato peel glycoalkaloids are also gaining importance [48]. Ncobela et al. [49] found that potato peel had a crude fiber content of 61.0 to 125 g/kg dry matter.
Studies about the use of additional by-products, in addition to the aforementioned by-products, which are the most common, will also be discussed in the following section.

2.2. Nutritional Composition and Potential Health Benefits of Using Agri-Food By-Products in Food Products

According to Salim et al. [50], the global population is projected to reach 11.2 billion by the year 2100. To meet the needs of this estimated population and resolve food security and environmental concerns, it is crucial to reduce food waste and maximize the use of food resources. The nutritional assessment of fruit and vegetable waste indicates that most of these crop residues and by-products can be used, recovered, and turned into food products with added nutritional value. Therefore, adding value to these residues via drying technology and extraction methods to produce dehydrated products and nutraceutical products, as well, might serve as an alternative market solution for the food and associated industries. In turn, this can generate additional economic opportunities and improve both environmental and social benefits for producers, processors, and consumers [50]. In a study carried out by Ayala et al. [51], it was mentioned that fruit by-products such as bagasse, trimmings, peels, shells, stems, seeds, and bran represent over 50% of fresh fruit and sometimes have a higher nutritional or functional content than the final product. However, these plant-waste products incorporate biomolecules including proteins, vitamins, minerals, aromatic oils, and antioxidant compounds [52]. It is important to consider the composition of by-products from the agri-food sector when developing a strategy to utilize them. These by-products can be a rich source of dietary fiber (DF), phenolic compounds, organic acids, carbohydrates, micronutrients (vitamins and minerals), proteins, and fats in this regard.

2.2.1. Dietary Fiber

Dietary fibers have an essential role that is important in managing and enhancing human health, especially that of the gastrointestinal system. Insoluble fiber is crucial for intestinal control because it promotes mechanical peristalsis. Dietary fibers have significant functional capabilities as food additives due to their effects on binding flavor components, swelling capacity, water retention capacity, gel formation, and increased viscosity. Additionally, because of its ability to water holding and swelling, a dietary fiber derived from agro-industrial by-products is a significant cholesterol-lowering agent [53].
Due to its physicochemical characteristics, which are directly related to its physiological implications, dietary fiber has been the subject of numerous studies. The polysaccharides of the cell wall, which are mostly made up of cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, and other substances such gums, starch, oligosaccharides, and lignin, are the primary components of DF. Based on their solubility in water and buffer systems, they are divided into soluble dietary fibers (SDFs) (gums, pectins, fructans, inulins, and certain hemicelluloses) and insoluble dietary fibers (IDFs) (cellulose, some hemicelluloses, lignins, and arabinoxylan) [54].
The most prevalent biopolymer in nature is cellulose, which is present in large concentrations in stems, straw, and peels. Banana stems make up 42% of cellulose, maize straw 51%, and onion and oat peels 41% and 39%, respectively [9].
After cellulose, hemicellulose is the second-most widespread component in lignocellulosic biomass, and it may be found in grapefruit waste (6%), chokeberry (34%), cherry (11%), citrus peel (10%), and blackcurrant pomace (25%) among other plant materials [55]. Apple pomace contains 35–60% dietary fiber (lignins 15–25%, pectins 5–10%, cellulose 7–40%, and hemicelluloses 4–25%) [56]. Apple and tomato pomace contain 51.1% and 64.1% of total dietary fiber, whereas citrus, mango, and tomato peels include 67.4%, 69.9%, 64.3%, and 86.2% of total dietary fiber, respectively. Total dietary fiber content in seeds ranges from 2.9 to 26.3%, which is lower than that in pomace and peels; however, it ranges from 35 to 90% in undifferentiated by-products [57,58,59].
According to various analytical and extraction techniques, pectin is largely present in fruit and vegetable peels, making up 8–53% of orange peel, 1–17% of lemon peel, and 2–16% of grape skin [60]. Legume seed coatings contain between 65 and 86% dietary fiber serving as an alternative source of functional ingredients [61,62]. The development of functional foods with a high nutritional value and various potential health benefits from the conversion of plant fruit processing by-products into compounds with high added- value is an encouraging solution for managing fruit waste product management issues [53]. In terms of health-promoting benefits, grape pomace extract has numerous properties, including cardio-protection, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, anti-aging, and antimicrobial properties. Its high dietary fiber content promotes glucose absorption, obesity prevention, blood cholesterol reduction, and reduced cardiovascular risk [63]. Additionally, grape pomace is an excellent source of fiber for the food sector, with a greater potential for modulating digestive functions and retention of water [64].
In order to lower the caloric content of jam without affecting its sensory qualities, soluble fibers are also utilized in the production of jam [65]. Fiber is added to food, including beverages, to replace the fiber that has been removed during industrial processing, which lowers the amount of sugar in the final product. The peel of the mango is a good source of nutritional fiber as well. Mango peel flour can be used to make pasta (macaroni), bakery goods (bread, cakes, and cookies), dairy goods (cheese, yogurt, and ice cream), and extruded foods. All of these food items are quite important in the global food economy [66]. According to Kohajdova et al. [67], the addition of beetroot powder to bakery products resulted in an enrichment of fiber with favorable effects on the farinographic and physical characteristics and a decreased caloric density. According to Mattos et al. [68], grape by-product extracts have also been employed as natural antioxidants and antibacterial agents in foods (meat products and fruit juices). Apple pomace were demonstrated to be effective stabilizers for oil-water emulsions in a study by Huc-Mathis et al. [69]. Banana peel flour, which is obtained at various stages of ripeness, is a useful functional component. When compared to bread made entirely of wheat flour, bread that incorporates banana peel flour exhibits significantly lower glycemic and hydrolysis indices [70]. Citrus fiber improved the bacterial survival and growth of the investigated probiotics (Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium spp.) in fermented milks [71]. Citrus pectin is used in numerous foods, including jams, jellies, marmalades, and other products, as a thickener, emulsifier, and stabilizer [72].

2.2.2. Phenolic Compounds

Phenolic compounds comprise a vast range of amphipathic chemicals (>8000 distinct known molecules). More structurally complicated phenolics are referred to as polyphenols, even though they always share at least one aromatic ring with one or more hydroxyl substituents [73]. The aromatic or benzyl rings of polyphenols may have one or more hydroxyl groups connected to them. In most cases, polyphenols are bound to sugars by β-glycosidic bonds to a hydroxyl group (O-glycosides) or an aromatic ring’s carbon atom (C-glycosides). The largest and most extensively researched class of polyphenols are flavonoids, which have structures made up of two aromatic rings connected by three carbon atoms to form an oxygenated heterocycle. Flavonoids are subdivided into a number of subgroups based on the degree of hydroxylation, oxidation, and saturation of the core pyran ring, including flavan-3-ols, flavonols (quercetin, kaempferol), flavones, isoflavones, flavanones, and anthocyanidins. The second largest group of polyphenols are non-flavonoids. They consist of phenolic acids, hydrolysable tannins, coumarins, stilbenes, and lignans, and they have a more simple chemical structure than flavonoids [74].
Those compounds are well recognized for their antioxidant effects, which may inhibit or postpone oxidation by lowering the concentration of transition metal ions (mostly iron and copper) and free radicals. Antioxidants are also employed in the food sector to maintain flavor and color by preventing the oxidation of their components [53]. According to Acosta-Estrada et al. [75], this group of compounds provides various health advantages including antioxidant, antibacterial, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory characteristics. Blackcurrant, cranberry peel, apple pomace, cherry, cactus peel, mango peel, and grape peel are a few agro-industrial by-products remarkable for their high phenolic content [10]. Bananas include catechin and gallocatechin, apple and grape pomace contain proanthocyanidins and flavonoids, and carrot pomace contains hydroxycinnamic derivatives such chlorogenic acid [76]. When exerting different biological processes where an antioxidant quality is desired, these and other by-products might be utilized. They can be utilized completely or further processed to separate and concentrate their chemical constituents, and have been considered to be of special interest for use in preserving or fortifying food products.
During a study on bioactive compounds, it was determined that the peel and seed of mango were the highest in concentration. It was found that the seed contained a total of 37.29 mg of gallic acid/g, 35.954 mg of quercetin/g fresh weight, and 93.4% of DPPH-free radical scavenging activity at a concentration of 307 mg/mL. Compared with the peel, which contained 5.997 mg, 4.455 mg, and 47.97% of DPPH-free radical scavenging activity at a concentration of 322 mg/mL, these amounts were found in the seeds [77]. Yu et al. [78] used colorimetric, chromatographic, and spectrophotometric assays to characterize the phenolic composition as well as antioxidant activity of seven medicinal and dietary plants, including sage, rosemary, olive, pomegranate, rue, peppermint, and parsley leaves and young stems. The study results revealed that pomegranate leaves have strong antioxidant activity due to their high tannin content and variety of phenolic compounds, while the other six plants have phenolic acids and flavonoids with high contents. Thus, they concluded that the pomegranate leaf might be a more valuable plant source of naturally occurring biologically active compounds for developing innovative functional food-pharma compounds that promote human health, bio-valorization, and the environment. The availability of accurate data on the biological functions of bioactive compounds from winery by-products enabled their identification as essential agents for various benefits associated with the prevention of degenerative disorders via their incorporation into functional foods, nutraceuticals, and cosmetic products [79]. Vinification residues are a good source of bioactive chemicals; however, the amount of phenolics and their compound identity and relative proportion depend on the residue type. The discovery of the winery wastes specific polyphenols led to the creation of larger valorization panels for these residues. Recycling vineyard co-products or side streams, then, gives the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, nutraceutical, and food industries important materials, lowering manufacturing costs and having a smaller negative impact on the environment [79]. Also, the study published in 2020 by Nieto et al. [80] emphasized the advantages of utilizing grape stems as a source of natural phenolic antioxidants by using green extraction technology as part of a sustainable food system, which validates the investigation conducted by other authors [81,82].
Another by-product is represented by the peel of citrus fruits, which contains a significantly higher concentration of phenolic compounds and ascorbic acid compared to the pulp [83]. The extraction of polyphenols from citrus by-products aroused the interest of researchers due to their large amounts and multifaceted properties, such as anti-inflammatory and anticancer effects, in addition to their antioxidant activity and other health benefits [84]. Moreover, the peel along with various residues and by-products of pomegranate, banana, and citrus were evaluated by various authors as potentially useful sources of antioxidants [85,86]. According to Szabo et al. [87], the phenolic compounds discovered in banana peel have antioxidant properties that include preventing the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), directly scavenging reactive oxygen species, and inducing antioxidant enzymes.
Apples and apple-derived products incorporate a significant number of polyphenolic compounds (phenolic acids, flavonoids, and procyanidins) [88].
The significant phenolic content of apples and apple by-products (powder and extracts) enables the production of final products with enhanced antioxidant benefits without altering their sensory characteristics. Furthermore, proper use of apple by-products reduces the negative impact on biodiversity, contributing also to economic growth [89]. Apple pomace, a by-product rich in vitamins, fibers, phenolic compounds, pigments, and minerals, plays a significant role in the human body due to their impacts on metabolism [87]. These elements can assist in the treatment of gastrointestinal conditions, decreasing the levels of serum triglycerides and levels of LDL cholesterol, and the regulation of glycemia. Additionally, phlorizin, a phenolic compound extracted from apple pomace, has many medicinal properties, especially in diabetes due to its ability to influence how glucose is absorbed and excreted [87,90].

2.2.3. Carotenoids and Tocopherols

The antioxidant pigments known as carotenoids and tocopherols, which are both precursors to vitamin A and vitamin E, respectively, are lipid-soluble [91]. According to functional classification, carotenoids are divided into two categories. Due to the oxygen present in their structures, xanthophylls like lutein, zeaxanthin, and cryptoxanthin are considered oxygenated derivatives. The other group is called carotenes, and it consists of α-carotene, β-carotene, and lycopene, which are hydrocarbon derivatives without any group linked to their structure [92]. Carotenoids are potent antioxidants that help to slow down the consequences of aging, which are linked to the loss of cellular activities over time. They also act as a preventative measure for other oxidative stress-related illnesses like osteoporosis. Effects against skin, ocular, and vascular ageing have been specifically shown, primarily as a result of the protection against cellular oxidation provided by their capacity to scavenge free radicals [93].
Carotenoids and chlorophyll were shown to be abundant in green pea pods and have potential applications as functional additives in food products [94]. β-carotene, an orange pigment, has been found in tomato skin and seeds, as well as in the by-products of sweet potatoes, carrots, and other vegetables. Red pigment lycopene has also been discovered in significant quantities in tomato by-products [95]. High concentrations of bioactive substances, such as β-carotene (32.6 mg/kg), ascorbic acids (111.89 mg/kg), and lycopene (174 mg/kg), are present in tomato processing waste (skin and seeds) [96]. Carrot by-products have also been found to contain β-carotene, and α-carotene. Carotenoids and chlorophylls, together with other phenols, play a significant impact in a food product’s color and acceptance, in addition to their health-promoting qualities, suggesting that legume by-products could be developed as food colorings [97].

2.2.4. Proteins

The most important macromolecules for forming body muscles are proteins, which are also a requirement for many other body molecules. Several fruit and vegetables’ non-edible parts and waste have been identified as good sources of protein, including the following: apple pomace (4.45 g), mango peel (9.5 g), banana peel (6.02 g), orange peel (5.97 g), potato solid waste (3 to 5 g), carrot pomace (10.06 g), tomato solid waste (17 to 22 g), cabbage leaves (20.4 g), and pea pods, shell, and peel (20.2 g) per 100 g. Citrus peels have a 2.5–10.0% protein concentration, according to the literature [98].

2.2.5. Organic Acids

Important biomolecules named organic acids are employed in the chemical, cosmetic, and food sectors. Citrus fruits like oranges and lemons contain citric acid. Fruits like tamarinds and grapes contain tartaric acid. Citrus fruits contain ascorbic acid as one source of vitamin C. Lactic acid and citric acid serve important roles in the food and pharmaceutical industries. Fermentation employing a variety of molds, yeasts, and bacteria can produce citric acid. However, Aspergillus niger continues to be a preferred mold species for the production of citric acid in industries [99]. As a substrate material, Aspergillus niger has also been used to produce up to 80% of citric acid from apple pomace [100]. Citric acid has also been produced from the waste of pineapple, mandarins, and mixed fruits, yielding 51.4%, 50%, and 46.5%, respectively [101].
A possible method to restore bioactive ingredients (fiber and phenolic compounds) into the food processing chain is to obtain them from agro-industrial by-products. As a result, it may be possible to create products that significantly improve the health of their consumers. In this way, adjusting the composition and functioning of food can enhance both their applicability and quality.

3. Approaches in the Application of Agri-Food By-Products in the Food Industry

3.1. Incorporation of By-Products into Various Food Products, Such as Bakery Goods, Meat Products, and Beverages

During the industrial food processing of agri-food products, enormous quantities of waste are produced, causing significant environmental contamination. Agri-food by-products can play important roles even though they are typically used as animal feed, compost, or thrown away. Adding value to agri-food by-products makes them more desirable and increases their economic value. This is because numerous studies over the past ten years have demonstrated that they are sources of bioactive compounds like phenolic compounds, antioxidants, dietary fiber, carotenoids, natural pigments, and protein, among others. Therefore, agri-food by-products can be utilized to create novel, scalable, and nutritionally significant functional foods. These functional foods include beverages, morning cereals, dairy products, meat products, bakery goods, and sweets (Table 1) [102,103].

3.2. Technological Applications of Food By-Products in Bakery Formulations

Adding functional food ingredients to bakery items would be a great method to satisfy consumer demand while keeping the products’ high level of physical, chemical, and organoleptic quality and improving their nutritional worth. White wheat flour is typically the principal component used in the creation of bakery products, a food category with a large global consumption rate. White flour has a high nutritional value but little antioxidant activity. It is a very common practice to add fruit and vegetable by-products to bakery goods including bread, snacks, and biscuits in order to increase their functional features. It is also well recognized that several fruit and vegetable by-products, including carrot peels, beetroot, raspberry, and cranberry pomace, can be used to boost the phenolic and dietary fiber content of baked goods [139,140,141].
Up to 10% of the wheat, maize, and waste grain composite flour bread was improved by Ginindza et al. [142]. The exact volume of the bread reduced as the amount of spent grain rose, but the volume and density increased. As the amount of spent grain added grew, so did the amount of fiber, protein, and ash. Fruit-based flours, like those manufactured from grapes, can be used as an alternative because they are thought to be a good source of fiber and nutrients. Because they can alter or improve the sensory and nutritional qualities of food products, consumers have come to connect fruit residues with healthful products [143,144].
Ungureanu et al. [145] examined amounts of grape skin flour above 3% in a study on pasta and noted more cooking loss, decreased brightness, increased red color, decreased dough elasticity, harder dough after cooking, and rougher surface. Gelatinized starch leaching, which accounts for the majority of cooking losses, is more prominent in gluten-free products because of the absence of the gluten network.

3.3. Technological Applications of Food By-Products in Dairy Formulations

According to the most recent Food Balance Sheets (FAOSTAT), compared to the other commodity groups—cereals, roots, and tubers; oilseeds and pulses; meat, fish, and shellfish; and dairy products—fruit and vegetables had the greatest levels of food losses along the food chain. The use of fruit and vegetable by-products as innovative ingredients in the manufacture of foods, particularly dairy products, consequently attracted more attention. This emphasis may be explained by a number of elements, including their environmental impact, the probable presence of phytochemicals that are health-promoting, and the fact that plant-derived by-products and losses primarily occur before family consumption, leaving them still available for reuse [146].
The impact of by-product addition on the physicochemical and sensory characteristics of spreadable cheese was examined in the study of Lucera et al. [125]. The findings showed that broccoli, artichokes, maize bran, and cheese samples with red and white wine grape pomace added produced the best outcomes from a nutritional standpoint. In general, when compared to the control sample, the addition of vegetable flour to cheese considerably enhanced the total phenolic content and flavonoids. Spreadable cheese could be enhanced technologically by adding red and white wine grape pomace to boost antioxidant components without sacrificing the sensory qualities.
As grape seed extracts were successfully used to prevent lipid oxidation during storage, grape pomace was found to delay oxidation of lipids in yogurt in an investigation by Marchiani et al. [147]. In addition, the addition of grape pomace may be utilized to increase the shelf life of dairy products by improving their capacity to be stored. It has been shown that using grape pomace can significantly boost the antioxidant activity and total phenolic content, which are absent from dairy products. In order to boost the polyphenol content of semi-hard and hard cheeses, grape pomace powder from Chardonnay was utilized. The results from Gaglio et al. [148] indicated that depending on the type of extract supplied, effects on pH that may increase acidity require special consideration. However, grape pomace can be used as a functional ingredient to boost cheese’s total content of phenolic compounds and its capacity to neutralize free radicals. Additionally, the inclusion of grape pomace can boost protein levels and secondary lipid oxidation while lowering the cheese’s fat content.

3.4. Technological Applications of Food By-Products in Meat Products

In their study of the oxidative stability of sausages with additional natural pigments and storage under refrigeration, Mercadante et al. [149] found that adding lycopene (10%) resulted in considerable decreases in redness but had no antioxidant impact.
Huda et al. [150] tried to create high fiber functional mutton nuggets that included apple pomace as well as to assess how the apple pomace affected the physico-chemical, textural, and sensory characteristics of the mutton nuggets. The crude fiber content of the control was discovered to be lower than that of the nuggets made with 5%, 10%, and 15% apple pomace, and it was discovered to considerably rise with the addition of more apple pomace. According to the textural characteristics, the goods’ hardness decreased when apple pomace was added, but only slightly affected the products’ springiness, cohesiveness, chewiness, and gumminess. In a study using grape flour and no heat treatment, Tremlova et al. [151] produced vegetarian sausages to see how they would turn out. They assessed how adding grape flour affected the chemical, physical, and sensory characteristics of this vegan sausage. Grape flour addition to vegan sausages increased antioxidant capacity and increased polyphenol content.

3.5. Technological Applications of Food By-Products in the Beverage Industry

The most advantageous aspect of beverages is that they make excellent carriers for delivering and incorporating nutrients and bioactive chemicals into the body. Since beverages are one of the best methods to provide our bodies the nutrients and bioactive substances they need, plant-based fermented beverages increased in popularity and quality in recent years [152]. It is generally recognized that by-products of the wine industry, notably wine pomace, can be utilized to prolong the shelf life of foods by inhibiting oxidative deterioration and limiting the development of spoiler bacteria [153].
In the brewing industry, the addition of white grape pomace from the Solaris variety raises the concentration of several volatile ingredients, such as ethyl decanoate or ethyl dodecanoate, which affects the sensory qualities of the beer. White grape pomace used to make beer has higher levels of phenolic compounds and antioxidant qualities. Fruit raised the concentration of organic acids including succinic, tartaric, and malic while decreasing the concentration of sugars in the beer [154]. Additionally, different authors like Pérez-Bibbins et al. [155] demonstrated that beers made with white grape pomace contain less of the harmful substance acetaldehyde.

4. Environmental and Economic Benefits of Reducing Food Waste and Utilizing Agri-Food By-Products

According to FAO’s report published in 2021, 828 million people were affected by hunger globally, and 3.1 billion were unable to afford a healthy diet. According to estimates, approximately 17% of global food production is lost in the supply chain, and 61% is wasted in households, 26% in food service, and 13% in retail [156]. Unsustainable agri-food systems degrade agricultural land, contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, loss of biodiversity, and consume groundwater. Reducing food loss and waste can transform agri-food systems, increase food availability, contribute to food security, healthy diets, and build resilience. This also serves as a climate strategy, by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and helping countries and businesses raise climate ambition while conserving ecosystems and natural resources [157].
Taking into consideration that the global population is projected to reach approximately 8.5 billion by 2030 [156], there is an urgent need for innovations to increase agricultural productivity while decreasing food waste [158]. According to the numbers provided by The World Counts, over one-third of the world’s food was wasted in 2022, and nearly 98 million tons of the world’s food has been wasted in 2023 up until the end of June. Also, the direct economic implications of food waste amount to around $750 billion each year, excluding fish and seafood [159].
Food waste incorporates nutrient-rich elements, such as lipids, proteins, polysaccharides, and metal ions, that can be recycled in certain processes to create products with added-value. In addition, food waste can be converted into biohydrogen, biogas, and biodiesel, which may serve as a substitute for nonrenewable fuel, thereby lowering reliance on fossil fuels. Several investigations demonstrated that, in experimental conditions, the synthesis of biochemicals from food waste is comparable to that from pure carbon sources [160].
According to Torres et al. [8], food waste is an important raw material with nutraceutical, nutritional, and medicinal benefits, which makes it an attractive ingredient for food formulations in developing nations. Individually extracted biomolecules such as vitamins, minerals, lipids, proteins, starch, antioxidants, and fibers can be used as nutritional ingredients. Functional food combined with bioactive ingredients offers additional nutritional benefits in addition to their nutritional effects. They support human health and protect against chronic conditions such as obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and cancer [161]. Innovative technologies of extraction such as ultrasound, microwave, pressurized liquid extraction, and enzyme-assisted extraction are used to extract these compounds, thereby minimizing environmental impacts, and enhancing the final product’s qualities [161,162].
The juice companies, which is the main producer of fruit and vegetable by-products with bioactive potential, enables the transformation of these matrices into useful and unique products that have positive health effects. Thus, their potential allows for the development of personalized, functional products with health benefits [163].
Reducing food waste and utilizing by-products improves resource efficiency in food production. This reduces the misallocation of resources, such as land, water, energy, and labor. Minimizing waste optimizes resources used in food production, reducing pressure on ecosystems, and promoting sustainable resource management. Proper management of by-products, such as composting and recycling, leads to more sustainable agricultural practices, preserving biodiversity and protecting ecosystems. Reducing food waste and optimizing the use of by-products can significantly reduce economic costs and improve food security. By minimizing losses for farmers, reducing disposal costs for businesses and saving consumer’s money, these by-products can be redirected to more uses that are productive, benefiting individuals, businesses, and the economy. This approach also presents opportunities for innovation and market development, fostering the growth of industries focused on waste reduction, recovery, and recycling. These emerging sectors contribute to job creation, economic growth, and increased competitiveness in the market. By maximizing the value derived from by-products, food production can be optimized, reducing the need for additional resources, and increasing overall food availability.
From the perspective of environmental protection, it is crucial to safely dispose of processing waste in order to reduce the amount of it, for example, by using integrated strategies to fully utilize the by-product in order to recover valuable by-products and/or ingredients. The high-added-value compounds may be used as nutraceuticals or food additives after recovery. The approach that waste is now managed is not only expensive, but it also harms the ecosystem. A strategy for the environmentally responsible use of by-products with the potential to be turned into food products must be developed. The development of novel, appealing products with bioactive qualities and a reduction in the impact of accumulation on the environment may be the goals of using agro-industrial wastes to produce bioextracts from the by-products [25].

5. Future Directions and Challenges

The use of by-products in the agri-food sector rapidly gained attention as a result of its potential to reduce waste, improve sustainability, as well as create additional value by adding to agricultural process efficiency. By adopting a circular economy approach, by-product utilization in agriculture will flourish. Rather than treating by-products as wastes, there is a growing trend to integrate them into the production process. Optimizing resource usage and minimizing waste contributes to sustainability and efficiency [164].
To account for food waste, the food industry generates tons of by-products when processing food each year. Fruit and vegetable by-products, which might develop during the pre- and post-harvesting, preparation, and processing of fruit and vegetables, make up the majority of the components. By-products contain phytochemical substances that have known anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant effects. Food waste is typically converted into animal feed, biogas, biomaterials, platform chemicals, biofuels, and bio-fertilizers [165]. However, over time, they have been used in a number of industrial industries (cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and food) because of the immense potential of their active compounds. The objective in the food sector was to re-introduce by-products as raw materials, to create new products with health benefits, to improve food preservation, or to create active packaging (Figure 2) [166].
In addition to their nutritional value, by-products can also contain bioactive compounds and nutrients that can be extracted and used for a variety of purposes. The future research and development efforts will be focused on identifying and optimizing extraction processes in order to maximize these by-products’ functional and nutritional value. There are several approaches to this problem, including using new enzymes, fermenting processes, and a number of biotechnological techniques. Numerous studies document the use of these by-products. As sources of bioactive agents to create films and coatings with antimicrobial and/or antioxidant abilities, as ingredients in various types of food that improve nutritional value, as natural preservatives to preserve food quality, and as sources of bioactive agents for these purposes [167].
The waste of food is considered a raw material that is nutritionally, functionally, and nutraceutically valuable. These raw materials can be used to make a wide variety of food formulations, making them a potential solution to issues regarding economic, social, and environmental sustainability. This can include their use as food ingredients, or as protein, lipids, vitamins, fiber, starch, minerals, and antioxidants, or as supplements. The food by-products contain additional biomolecules that can be chemically or physically extracted and utilized as functional and nutritive components. The application of the unitary drying operation is required to minimize microbial hazards and maintain the physicochemical and microbiological stability of biomaterials during the valorization of these food wastes. Governments should, therefore, promote the development of the technology and infrastructure necessary to enable the use of food by-products and wastes in production and storage regions. On the other hand, removing additional hazards like those posed by hazardous materials and antinutritional elements should also be taken into account [8].
It is well known that the agri-food sector faces a number of significant environmental challenges related to waste management and environmental impact. It has been shown that by using by-products, the industry can reduce waste generation, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and conserve resources, therefore minimizing its ecological footprint. As part of future efforts, we will be focusing on improving waste management systems, improving waste valorizing technologies, and tackling regulatory and logistical issues. There are a number of factors that should be considered when integrating by-products into the agricultural and food industries, including consumer acceptance and marketability. The perceptions of consumers, their taste preferences, and product labeling play an extremely important role in determining how successful by-product-based foods are in the market [168].
The sensory quality of the food materials and acceptance by consumers is another important restriction on the use of food wastes/by-products as functional food ingredients for the design and development of new food products. Compared to their usage as biofuel in the industry, food wastes and by-products are rarely used as useful components in industrially produced food. Therefore, research that is more thorough is required to improve the quality and consumer acceptance of novel functional foods. Additionally, the companies ought to make an effort to valorize their food by-products and wastes by incorporating them into new products. To reintegrate the wastes of their products to the original food on an industrial scale, for instance, changes in the processing processes and designs may be taken into consideration (to make tomato paste or sauce, tomato skin and seeds can be processed). On the other hand, it is likely that the intermediary enterprises (waste brokers) will multiply in the future, which will be advantageous from the standpoint of waste valorization. Waste brokers are organizations that gather trash and direct it to certain locations for processing into novel products or components. However, a look at the future will involve the development of innovative processing techniques, the creation of appealing and nutritious food products derived from by-products, and the implementation of effective marketing strategies to enhance consumer acceptance [8].
Among the stakeholders that can realize the full potential of using by-products within the agricultural food industry is collaboration and policy support, which includes farmers, processors, researchers, policymakers, and consumers. It is possible for governments and regulatory bodies to provide support by providing policies and incentives that encourage the utilization of by-products encourage the advancement of research and development, and set quality and safety standards. The by-products in the agricultural industry hold great potential as a way to address sustainability challenges, reduce waste, and create value for the future in the agri-food sector. There will still be challenges to overcome, however, and this will require ongoing research, innovation, collaboration, and supporting policies in order to overcome these challenges [167].

6. Conclusions

A significant amount of food industry by-products can be utilized as raw materials in the development of functional foods because they serve as valuable raw materials. Due to their disease-curing properties, functional foods have been steadily increasing in popularity for years. The research that is now available makes it clear that agri-food by-products offer a variety of opportunities for the isolation of natural bioactive compounds with potential uses in the food industry. Food by-products can be employed as proteins, lipids, fibers, vitamins, starches, antioxidants, minerals, or as food ingredients. Food industry by-products can be effectively utilized to decrease negative costs, reduce environmental pollution, and demonstrate sustainability, which, in turn, influences the country’s economy directly. This can help reduce the negative costs associated with the food industry. Consequently, the food industry is becoming an integral part of the zero-waste society and the nation.
Food by-products will also help to boost new markets in functional foods, by serving as functional food ingredients. In food science and technology, one of the biggest challenges is finding new functional food ingredients from natural sources. In order to make valuable food by-products and increase profitability, science and innovation should be used.
Food by-products could be used to create novel functional food products or ingredients because of all the evidence that has already been reported highlighting their qualities and richness in bioactive molecules. This is the main advantage for the industries for their transformation into valuable products within the circular bioeconomy framework. Therefore, more thorough research on the development of novel functional foods is required in order to increase their quality and acceptance among consumers.
As was the case at the start of the twenty-first century, we are currently in a time of transition toward something new, more diverse, and centered on the promotion of green technologies and the circular bioeconomy in order to harness these natural resources for human welfare and to contribute to sustainable development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.N.R. and I.S.B.; formal analysis, F.S.; investigation, F.D.L., A.U., F.F., I.D.V., V.N.A., I.C.C., A.M.F., M.A.C. and I.S.B.; resources, R.N.R.; writing—original draft preparation, R.N.R.; writing—review and editing, R.N.R., I.D.V. and I.C.C.; supervision, R.N.R., I.C.C. and A.N.P.; project administration, R.N.R. and I.D.V.; funding acquisition, V.N.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. EEA. Circular Economy in Europe—Developing the Knowledge Base: Report 2; European Environment Agency: København, Denmark, 2016. [CrossRef]
  2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Food Wastage Footprint. In Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2013. Available online: http://www.fao.org/nr/sustainability/food-loss-and-waste/en/ (accessed on 26 June 2023).
  3. Cara, G.I.; Topa, D.; Puiu, I.; Jitareanu, G. Biochar a Promising Strategy for Pesticide-Contaminated Soils. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Comunian, T.A.; Silva, M.P.; Souza, C.J.F. The Use of Food By-Products as a Novel for Functional Foods: Their Use as Ingredients and for the Encapsulation Process. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 108, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Berenguer, C.V.; Andrade, C.; Pereira, J.A.M.; Perestrelo, R.; Câmara, J.S. Current challenges in the sustainable valorisation of agri-food wastes: A review. Processes 2022, 11, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Carpentieri, S.; Larrea-Wachtendorff, D.; Donsì, F.; Ferrari, G. Functionalization of pasta through the incorporation of bioactive compounds from agri-food by-products: Fundamentals, opportunities, and drawbacks. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 122, 49–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Isah, S.; Ozbay, G. Valorization of food loss and wastes: Feedstocks for biofuels and valuable chemicals. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Torres-León, C.; Ramírez-Guzman, N.; Londoño-Hernandez, L.; Martinez-Medina, G.A.; Díaz-Herrera, R.; Navarro-Macias, V.; Alvarez-Pérez, O.B.; Picazo, B.; Villarreal-Vázquez, M.; Ascacio-Valdes, J.; et al. Food Waste and Byproducts: An Opportunity to Minimize Malnutrition and Hunger in Developing Countries. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2018, 2, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Khorairi, A.; Sofian-Seng, A.N.S.; Othaman, N.S.; Abdul Rahman, R.; Mohd Razali, H.; Lim, N.S.; Wan Mustapha, S.J. A Review on Agro-Industrial Waste as Cellulose and Nanocellulose Source and Their Potentials in Food Applications. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 39, 663–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Marcillo-Parra, V.; Tupuna-Yerovi, D.S.; Gonzalez, Z.; Ruales, J. Encapsulation of Bioactive Compounds from Fruit and Vegetable By-Products for Food Application-A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 116, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saini, A.; Panesar, P.S.; Bera, M.B. Valorization of fruits and vegetables waste through green extraction of bioactive compounds and their nanoemulsions-based delivery system. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2019, 6, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tiwari, A.; Khawas, R. Food waste and Agro by-products: A step towards food sustainability. In Innovation in the Food Sector through the Valorization of Food and Agro-Food By-Products; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  13. Plasek, B.; Lakner, Z.; Kasza, G.; Temesi, Á. Consumer Evaluation of the Role of Functional Food Products in Disease Prevention and the Characteristics of Target Groups. Nutrients 2019, 12, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Bharat Helkar, P.; Sahoo, A.K. Review: Food Industry by-Products Used as a Functional Food Ingredients. Int. J. Waste Resour. 2016, 6, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. WFPUSA. Difference between Food Waste vs Food Loss: Examples & Answers. 2023. Available online: https://www.wfpusa.org/articles/food-loss-vs-food-waste-primer (accessed on 26 June 2023).
  16. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355241289_Progress_in_the_Valorization_of_Fruit_and_Vegetable_Wastes_Active_Packaging_Biocomposites_By-products_and_Innovative_Technologies_Used_for_Bioactive_Compound_Extraction (accessed on 26 June 2023).
  17. Socas-Rodríguez, B.; Álvarez-Rivera, G.; Valdés, A.; Ibáñez, E.; Cifuentes, A. Food By-Products and Food Wastes: Are They Safe Enough for Their Valorization? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 114, 133–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kumari, B.; Tiwari, B.K.; Hossain, M.B.; Brunton, N.P.; Rai, D.K. Recent Advances on Application of Ultrasound and Pulsed Electric Field Technologies in the Extraction of Bioactives from Agro-Industrial by-Products. Food Bioproc. Technol. 2018, 11, 223–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cecilia, J.A.; García-Sancho, C.; Maireles-Torres, P.J.; Luque, R. Industrial Food Waste Valorization: A General Overview. In Biorefinery; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 253–277. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sadh, P.K.; Duhan, S.; Duhan, J.S. Agro-Industrial Wastes and Their Utilization Using Solid State Fermentation: A Review. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2018, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Reguengo, L.M.; Salgaço, M.K.; Sivieri, K.; Maróstica Júnior, M.R. Agro-Industrial by-Products: Valuable Sources of Bioactive Compounds. Food Res. Int. 2022, 152, 110871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hussain, S.; Jõudu, I.; Bhat, R. Dietary Fiber from Underutilized Plant Resources—A Positive Approach for Valorization of Fruit and Vegetable Wastes. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. De Los, Á.; Fernández, M.; Espino, M.; Gomez, F.J.V.; Silva, M.F. Novel Approaches Mediated by Tailor-Made Green Solvents for the Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Agro-Food Industrial by-Products. Food Chem. 2018, 239, 671–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jiménez-Moreno, N.; Esparza, I.; Bimbela, F.; Gandía, L.M.; Ancín-Azpilicueta, C. Valorization of Selected Fruit and Vegetable Wastes as Bioactive Compounds: Opportunities and Challenges. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 50, 2061–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kaderides, K.; Goula, A.M.; Konstantinos, G. A Process for Turining Pomegranate Peels into a Valuable Food Ingredient Using Ultrasound Assisted Extraction and Encapsulation. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2015, 31, 204–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Barreira, J.C.M.; Arraibi, A.A.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Bioactive and Functional Compounds in Apple Pomace from Juice and Cider Manufacturing: Potential Use in Dermal Formulations. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 90, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rabetafika, H.N.; Bchir, B.; Blecker, C.; Richel, A. Fractionation of Apple By-Products as Source of New Ingredients: Current Situation and Perspectives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 40, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zema, D.A.; Calabrò, P.S.; Folino, A.; Tamburino, V.; Zappia, G.; Zimbone, S.M. Valorisation of Citrus Processing Waste: A Review. Waste Manag. 2018, 80, 252–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Shea, O.; Arendt, N.; Gallagher, E.K. Dietary Fibre and Phytochemical Characteristics of Fruit and Vegetable By-Products and Their Recent Applications as Novel Ingredients in Food Products. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2012, 16, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bordiga, M.; Travaglia, F.; Locatelli, M. Valorisation of Grape Pomace: An Approach That Is Increasingly Reaching Its Maturity-A Review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 933–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yu, J.; Ahmedna, M. Functional Components of Grape Pomace: Their Composition, Biological Properties and Potential Applications. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 221–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zheng, Y.; Lee, C.; Yu, C.; Cheng, Y.-S.; Simmons, C.W.; Zhang, R.; Jenkins, B.M.; VanderGheynst, J.S. Ensilage and Bioconversion of Grape Pomace into Fuel Ethanol. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 11128–11134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Minjares-Fuentes, R.; Femenia, A.; Garau, M.C.; Meza-Velasquez, L.A.; Simal, S.; Rossello, C. Ultrasoundassisted Extraction of Pectins from Grape Pomace Using Citric Acid: A Response Surface Methodology Approach. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 106, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yi, C.; Shi, J.; Kramer, J.; Xue, S.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Ma, Y.; Pohorly, J. Fatty Acid Composition and Phenolic Antioxidants of Winemaking Pomace Powder. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 570–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Islam, M.R.; Kamal, M.M.; Kabir, M.R.; Hasan, M.M.; Haque, A.R.; Hasan, S.M.K. Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidants Activity of Banana Peel Extracts: Testing and Optimization of Enzyme-Assisted Conditions. Meas. Food 2023, 10, 100085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pelissari, F.M.; Sobral, P.J.D.A.; Menegalli, F.C. Isolation and Characterization of Cellulose Nano-Fibers from Banana Peels. Cellulose 2014, 21, 417–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ballesteros-Vivas, D.; Alvarez-Rivera, G.; Medina, S.J.M.; Del Pilar Sánchez Camargo, A.; Ibánez, E.; Parada-Alfonso, F.; Cifuentes, A. An Integrated Approach for the Valorization of Mango Seed Kernel: Efficient Extraction Solvent Selection, Photochemical Profiling and Anti-Proliferative Activity Assessment. Food Res. Int. 2019, 126, 108616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, H.; Kim, H.; Mosaddik, A.; Gyawali, R.; Ahn, K.S.; Cho, S.K. Induction of Apoptosis by Ethanolic Extract of Mango Peel and Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Constitutes of Mango Peel and Flesh. Food Chem. 2012, 133, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ajila, C.; Naidu, K.; Bhat, S.; Rao, U. Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Potential of Mango Peel Extract. Food Chem. 2007, 105, 982–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sójka, M.; Kołodziejczyk, K.; Milala, J.; Abadias, M.; Viñas, I.; Guyot, S.; Baron, A. Composition and Properties of the Polyphenolic Extracts Obtained from Industrial Plum Pomaces. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 12, 168–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Valle, D.; Camara, M.; Torija, M. Chemical Characterization of Tomato Pomace. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006, 86, 1232–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chantaro, P.; Devahastin, S.; Chiewchan, N. Production of Antioxidant High Dietary Fiber Powder from Carrot Peels. Lebenson. Wiss. Technol. 2008, 41, 1987–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Benitez, V.; Molla, E.; Martın-Cabrejas, M.A.; Aguilera, Y.; Lopez-Andreu, F.J.; Terry, L.A.; Esteban, R.M. The Impact of Pasteurization and Sterilization on Bioactive Compounds of Onion By-Products. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 1979–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Regueiro, J.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Rodrigues, A.S.; Almeida, D. Increasing the Addedvalue of Onions as a Source of Antioxidant Flavonoids: A Critical Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 54, 1050–1062. [Google Scholar]
  45. Gómez, M.; Martinez, M.M. Fruit and Vegetable By-Products as Novel Ingredients to Improve the Nutritional Quality of Baked Goods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 2119–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Vulić, J.J.; Ćebović, T.N.; Čanadanović-Brunet, J.M.; Ćetković, G.S.; Čanadanović, V.M.; Djilas, S.M.; Tumbas Šaponjac, V.T. In Vivo and in Vitro Antioxidant Effects of Beetroot Pomace Extracts. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 6, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Albishi, T.; John, J.A.; Al-Khalifa, A.S.; Shahidi, F. Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activities of Selected Potato Varieties and Their Processing By-Products. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 590–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Friedman, M. Chemistry and Anticarcinogenic Mechanisms of Glycoalkaloids Produced by Eggplants, Potatoes, and Tomatoes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 3323–3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ncobela, C.N.; Kanengoni, A.T.; Hlatini, V.A.; Thomas, R.S.; Chimonyo, M. A Review of the Utility of Potato By-Products as a Feed Resource for Smallholder Pig Production. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2017, 227, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Salim, N.S.M.; Singh, A.; Raghavan, V. Potential Utilization of Fruit and Vegetable Wastes for Food through Drying or Extraction Techniques. Nov. Tech. Nutr. Food Sci. 2017, 1, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ayala-Zavala, J.F.; Vega-Vega, V.; Rosas-Domínguez, C.; Palafox-Carlos, H.; Villa-Rodriguez, J.A.; Siddiqui, M.W.; Dávila-Aviña, J.E.; González-Aguilar, G.A. Agro-Industrial Potential of Exotic Fruit Byproducts as a Source of Food Additives. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1866–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dimou, C.; Karantonis, H.C.; Skalkos, D.; Koutelidakis, A.E. Valorization of Fruits By-Products to Unconventional Sources of Additives, Oil, Biomolecules and Innovative Functional Foods. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2019, 20, 776–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Alexandre, E.M.C.; Castro, L.M.G.; Moreira, S.A.; Pintado, M.; Saraiva, J.A. Comparison of Emerging Technologies to Extract High-Added Value Compounds from Fruit Residues: Pressure- and Electro-Based Technologies. Food Eng. Rev. 2017, 9, 190–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rezende, E.S.V.; Lima, G.C.; Naves, M.M.V. Dietary Fibers as Beneficial Microbiota Modulators: A Proposed Classification by Prebiotic Categories. Nutrition 2021, 89, 111217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nawirska, A.; Kwaśniewska, M. Dietary Fibre Fractions from Fruit and Vegetable Processing Waste. Food Chem. 2005, 91, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dhillon, G.S.; Kaur, S.; Brar, S.K. Perspective of Apple Processing Wastes as Low-Cost Substrates for Bioproduction of High Value Products: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 27, 789–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Navarro-González, I.; García-Valverde, V.; García-Alonso, J.; Periago, M.J. Chemical Profile, Functional and Antioxidant Properties of Tomato Peel Fiber. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1528–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jayalaxmi, B.; Vijayalakshmi, D.; Kapale, M. Extraction of Total Polyphenols and Dietary Fiber from Mango Peel-As Potential Sources of Natural Phytonutrients. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2018, 7, 1196–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pacheco, M.T.; Moreno, F.J.; Villamiel, M. Chemical and Physicochemical Characterization of Orange By-Products Derived from Industry. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 868–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Venkatanagaraju, E.; Bharathi, N.; Hema Sindhuja, R.; Roy Chowdhury, R.; Sreelekha, Y. Extraction and Purification of Pectin from Agro-Industrial Wastes. In Pectins—Extraction, Purification, Characterization and Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  61. Ayo, J.A.; Kajo, N. Effect of Soybean Hulls Supplementation on the Quality of Acha Based Biscuits. Agric. Biol. J. N. Am. 2016, 6, 49–56. [Google Scholar]
  62. Sęczyk, Ł.; Świeca, M.; Dziki, D.; Anders, A.; Gawlik-Dziki, U. Antioxidant, Nutritional and Functional Characteristics of Wheat Bread Enriched with Ground Flaxseed Hulls. Food Chem. 2017, 214, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Averilla, J.N.; Oh, J.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, J.-S. Potential Health Benefits of Phenolic Compounds in Grape Processing By-Products. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 28, 1607–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Iannone, A.; Sapone, V.; Di Paola, L.; Cicci, A.; Bravi, M. Extraction of Anthocyanins from Grape (Vitis Vinifera) Skins Employing Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents (NaDES). Chem. Eng. Trans. 2021, 87, 469–474. [Google Scholar]
  65. Belovic, M.; Torbica, A.; Pajic-Lijakovic, I.; Mastilovic, J. Development of Lowcalorie Jams with Increased Content of Natural Dietary Fibre Made from Tomato Pomace. Food Chem. 2017, 237, 1226–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Serna-Cock, L.; García-Gonzales, E.; Torres-León, C. Agro-Industrial Potential of the Mango Peel Based on Its Nutritional and Functional Properties. Food Rev. Int. 2016, 32, 364–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kohajdová, Z.; Karovičová, J.; Kuchtová, V.; Lauková, M. Utilisation of Beetroot Powder for Bakery Applications. Chem. Pap. 2018, 72, 1507–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mattos, G.N.; Tonon, R.V.; Furtado, A.A.L.; Cabral, L.M.C. Grape By-Product Extracts against Microbial Proliferation and Lipid Oxidation: A Review: Grape by-Products with Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 1055–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Huc-Mathis, D.; Journet, C.; Fayolle, N.; Bosc, V. Emulsifying Properties of Food By-Products: Valorizing Apple Pomace and Oat Bran. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 568, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Juarez-Garcia, E.; Agama-Acevedo, E.; Sáyago-Ayerdi, S.G.; Rodríguez-Ambriz, S.L.; Bello-Pérez, L.A. Composition, Digestibility and Application in Breadmaking of Banana Flour. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2006, 61, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sendra, E.; Fayos, P.; Lario, Y.; Fernández-López, J.; Sayas-Barberá, E.; Pérez-Alvarez, J.A. Incorporation of Citrus Fibers in Fermented Milk Containing Probiotic Bacteria. Food Microbiol. 2008, 25, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Satari, B.; Karimi, K. Citrus Processing Wastes: Environmental Impacts, Recent Advances, and Future Perspectives in Total Valorization. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 129, 153–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Singh, V.K.; Das, S.; Dubey, N.K. Nutritional Oils for Food and Their Quality Improvement Using Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). In Reference Module in Food Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  74. Del Rio, D.; Rodriguez-Mateos, A.; Spencer, J.P.E.; Tognolini, M.; Borges, G.; Crozier, A. Dietary (Poly)Phenolics in Human Health: Structures, Bioavailability, and Evidence of Protective Effects against Chronic Diseases. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 18, 1818–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Acosta-Estrada, B.A.; Gutiérrez-Uribe, J.A.; Serna-Saldívar, S.O. Bound Phenolics in Foods, a Review. Food Chem. 2014, 152, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Omre, P.K.; Singh, S.; Singh, S. Waste Utilization of Fruits and Vegetables—A Review. South Asian J. Food Technol. Environ. 2018, 4, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ayala-Zavala, J.F.; Rosas-Domínguez, C.; Vega-Vega, V.; González-Aguilar, G.A. Antioxidant Enrichment and Antimicrobial Protection of Fresh-Cut Fruits Using Their Own Byproducts: Looking for Integral Exploitation. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75, R175–R181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Yu, M.; Gouvinhas, I.; Rocha, J.; Barros, A.I.R.N.A. Phytochemical and Antioxidant Analysis of Medicinal and Food Plants towards Bioactive Food and Pharmaceutical Resources. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Teixeira, A.; Baenas, N.; Dominguez-Perles, R.; Barros, A.; Rosa, E.; Moreno, D.A.; Garcia-Viguera, C. Natural Bioactive Compounds from Winery by-Products as Health Promoters: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 15638–15678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Nieto, J.A.; Santoyo, S.; Prodanov, M.; Reglero, G.; Jaime, L. Valorisation of Grape Stems as a Source of Phenolic Antioxidants by Using a Sustainable Extraction Methodology. Foods 2020, 9, 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Barros, A.; Gouvinhas, I.; Machado, N.; Pinto, J.; Cunha, M.; Rosa, E.; Domínguez-Perles, R. New Grape Stems-Based Liqueur: Physicochemical and Phytochemical Evaluation. Food Chem. 2016, 190, 896–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ruiz-Moreno, M.J.; Raposo, R.; Cayuela, J.M.; Zafrilla, P.; Piñeiro, Z.; Moreno-Rojas, J.M.; Mulero, J.; Puertas, B.; Giron, F.; Guerrero, R.F.; et al. Valorization of Grape Stems. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 63, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Goula, A.M.; Lazarides, H.N. Integrated Processes Can Turn Industrial Food Waste into Valuable Food By-Products and/or Ingredients: The Cases of Olive Mill and Pomegranate Wastes. J. Food Eng. 2015, 167, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Singh, B.; Singh, J.P.; Kaur, A.; Singh, N. Phenolic Composition, Antioxidant Potential and Health Benefits of Citrus Peel. Food Res. Int. 2020, 132, 109114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. González-Montelongo, R.; Gloria Lobo, M.; González, M. Antioxidant Activity in Banana Peel Extracts: Testing Extraction Conditions and Related Bioactive Compounds. Food Chem. 2010, 119, 1030–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lafka, T.-I.; Sinanoglou, V.; Lazos, E.S. On the Extraction and Antioxidant Activity of Phenolic Compounds from Winery Wastes. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 1206–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Szabo, K.; Mitrea, L.; Călinoiu, L.F.; Teleky, B.-E.; Martău, G.A.; Plamada, D.; Pascuta, M.S.; Nemeş, S.-A.; Varvara, R.-A.; Vodnar, D.C. Natural Polyphenol Recovery from Apple-, Cereal-, and Tomato-Processing by-Products and Related Health-Promoting Properties. Molecules 2022, 27, 7977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Rojas-García, A.; Rodríguez, L.; Cádiz-Gurrea, M.d.l.L.; García-Villegas, A.; Fuentes, E.; Villegas-Aguilar, M.d.C.; Palomo, I.; Arráez-Román, D.; Segura-Carretero, A. Determination of the Bioactive Effect of Custard Apple By-Products by in Vitro Assays. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Asma, U.; Morozova, K.; Ferrentino, G.; Scampicchio, M. Apples and Apple By-Products: Antioxidant Properties and Food Applications. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ben-Othman, S.; Jõudu, I.; Bhat, R. Bioactives from Agri-Food Wastes: Present Insights and Future Challenges. Molecules 2020, 25, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Meléndez-Martínez, A.J.; Mandić, A.I.; Bantis, F.; Böhm, V.; Borge, G.I.A.; Brnčić, M.; Bysted, A.; Cano, M.P.; Dias, M.G.; Elgersma, A.; et al. A Comprehensive Review on Carotenoids in Foods and Feeds: Status Quo, Applications, Patents, and Research Needs. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 1999–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Saini, R.K.; Nile, S.H.; Park, S.W. Carotenoids from Fruits and Vegetables: Chemistry, Analysis, Occurrence, Bioavailability and Biological Activities. Food Res. Int. 2015, 76 Pt 3, 735–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Rivera-Madrid, R.; Carballo-Uicab, V.M.; Cárdenas-Conejo, Y.; Aguilar-Espinosa, M.; Siva, R. Overview of Carotenoids and Beneficial Effects on Human Health. In Carotenoids: Properties, Processing and Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  94. Rudra, S.G.; Hanan, E.; Sagar, V.R.; Bhardwaj, R.; Basu, S.; Sharma, V. Manufacturing of Mayonnaise with Pea Pod Powder as a Functional Ingredient. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2020, 14, 2402–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tiwari, S.; Upadhyay, N.; Singh, A.K.; Meena, G.S.; Arora, S. Organic Solvent-Free Extraction of Carotenoids from Carrot Bio-Waste and Its Physico-Chemical Properties. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 4678–4687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Nour, V.; Ionica, M.E.; Trandafir, I. Bread Enriched in Lycopene and Other Bioactive Compounds by Addition of Dry Tomato Waste. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 8260–8267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Santanna, V.; Christiano, F.D.P.; Marczak, L.D.F.; Tessaro, I.C.; Thys, R.C. The Effect of the Incorporation of Grape Marc Powder in Fettuccini Pasta Properties. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 58, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sharma, R.; Oberoi, H.S.; Dhillon, G.S. Agro-Industrial Wastes as Feedstock for Enzyme Production: Apply and Exploit the Emerging and Valuable Use Options of Waste Biomass; Dhillon, G.S., Kaur, S., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  99. Swain, M.R.; Ray, R.C.; Patra, J.K. Citric Acid: Microbial Production and Applications in Food and Pharmaceutical Industries. In Citric Acid: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications; Vargas, D.A., Medina, J.V., Eds.; Nova Science Publishers: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  100. Dhillon, G.S.; Brar, S.K.; Verma, M.; Tyagi, R.D. Enhanced Solid-State Citric Acid Bio-Production Using Apple Pomace Waste through Surface Response Methodology: Enhanced Solid-State Citric Acid Bio-Production. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 110, 1045–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Prabha, M.S.; Rangaiah, G.S. Citric Acid Production Using Ananas Comosus and Its Waste with the Effect of Alcohols. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. 2014, 3, 747–754. [Google Scholar]
  102. Ibrahim, S.A.; Fidan, H.; Aljaloud, S.O.; Stankov, S.; Ivanov, G. Application of Date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) Fruit in the Composition of a Novel Snack Bar. Foods 2021, 10, 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Coman, V.; Teleky, B.-E.; Mitrea, L.; Martău, G.A.; Szabo, K.; Călinoiu, L.-F.; Vodnar, D.C. Bioactive Potential of Fruit and Vegetable Wastes. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2020, 91, 157–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Srivastava, P.; Indrani, D.; Singh, R.P. Effect of Dried Pomegranate (Punica granatum) Peel Powder (DPPP) on Textural, Organoleptic and Nutritional Characteristics of Biscuits. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 65, 827–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ajila, C.M.; Leelavathi, K.; Prasada Rao, U.J.S. Improvement of Dietary Fiber Content and Antioxidant Properties in Soft Dough Biscuits with the Incorporation of Mango Peel Powder. J. Cereal Sci. 2008, 48, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Martins, Z.E.; Pinho, O.; Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O. Food Industry By-Products Used as Functional Ingredients of Bakery Products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 67, 106–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Meral, R.; Köse, Y.E. The Effect of Bread-Making Process on the Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Profile of Enriched Breads. Qual. Assur. Saf. Crops Foods 2019, 11, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hussain, M.I.; Farooq, M.; Syed, Q.A. Nutritional and Biological Characteristics of the Date Palm Fruit (Phoenix dactylifera L.)-A Review. Food Biosci. 2020, 34, 100509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Romero-Lopez, M.R.; Osorio-Diaz, P.; Bello-Perez, L.A.; Tovar, J.; Bernardino-Nicanor, A. Fiber Concentrate from Orange (Citrus sinensis L.) Bagase: Characterization and Application as Bakery Product Ingredient. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 2174–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Rupasinghe, H.; Wang, L.; Huber, G.; Pitts, N. Effect of Baking on Dietary Fibre and Phenolics of Muffins Incorporated with Apple Skin Powder. Food Chem. 2008, 107, 1217–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ramírez-Maganda, J.; Blancas-Benítez, F.J.; Zamora-Gasga, V.M.; García-Magaña, M.d.L.; Bello-Pérez, L.A.; Tovar, J.; Sáyago-Ayerdi, S.G. Nutritional Properties and Phenolic Content of a Bakery Product Substituted with a Mango (Mangifera Indica) ‘Ataulfo’ Processing by-Product. Food Res. Int. 2015, 73, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Bajerska, J.; Mildner-Szkudlarz, S.; Górnaś, P.; Seglina, D. The Effects of Muffins Enriched with Sour Cherry Pomace on Acceptability, Glycemic Response, Satiety and Energy Intake: A Randomized Crossover Trial: The Effects of Muffins Enriched with Sour Cherry Pomace in a Crossover Trial. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 2486–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Jeddou, K.B.; Bouaziz, F.; Zouari-Ellouzi, S.; Chaari, F.; Ellouz-Chaabouni, S.; Ellouz-Ghorbel, R.; Nouri-Ellouz, O. Improvement of Texture and Sensory Properties of Cakes by Addition of Potato Peel Powder with High Level of Dietary Fiber and Protein. Food Chem. 2017, 217, 668–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Kırbaş, Z.; Kumcuoglu, S.; Tavman, S. Effects of Apple, Orange and Carrot Pomace Powders on Gluten-Free Batter Rheology and Cake Properties. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 914–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Krishnan, R.; Dharmaraj, U.; Sai Manohar, R.; Malleshi, N.G. Quality Characteristics of Biscuits Prepared from Finger Millet Seed Coat Based Composite Flour. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Alongi, M.; Melchior, S.; Anese, M. Reducing the Glycemic Index of Short Dough Biscuits by Using Apple Pomace as a Functional Ingredient. Lebenson. Wiss. Technol. 2019, 100, 300–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Colantuono, A.; Ferracane, R.; Vitaglione, P. In Vitro Bioaccessibility and Functional Properties of Polyphenols from Pomegranate Peels and Pomegranate Peels-Enriched Cookies. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 4247–4258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Theagarajan, R.; Narayanaswamy, L.M.; Dutta, S.; Moses, J.A.; Chinnaswamy, A. Valorisation of Grape Pomace (Cv. Muscat) for Development of Functional Cookies. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 1299–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. de Toledo, N.M.V.; Nunes, L.P.; da Silva, P.P.M.; Spoto, M.H.F.; Canniatti-Brazaca, S.G. Influence of Pineapple, Apple and Melon by-Products on Cookies: Physicochemical and Sensory Aspects. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 1185–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Servili, M.; Rizzello, C.G.; Taticchi, A.; Esposto, S.; Urbani, S.; Mazzacane, F.; Di Maio, I.; Selvaggini, R.; Gobbetti, M.; Di Cagno, R. Functional Milk Beverage Fortified with Phenolic Compounds Extracted from Olive Vegetation Water, and Fermented with Functional Lactic Acid Bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 147, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Issar, K.; Sharma, P.C.; Gupta, A. Utilization of Apple Pomace in the Preparation of Fiber-Enriched Acidophilus Yoghurt: Utilization of Apple Pomace Fiber in Yoghurt. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2017, 41, e13098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Aliakbarian, B.; Casale, M.; Paini, M.; Casazza, A.A.; Lanteri, S.; Perego, P. Production of a Novel Fermented Milk Fortified with Natural Antioxidants and Its Analysis by NIR Spectroscopy. Lebenson. Wiss. Technol. 2015, 62, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Chouchouli, V.; Kalogeropoulos, N.; Konteles, S.J.; Karvela, E.; Makris, D.P.; Karathanos, V.T. Fortification of Yoghurts with Grape (Vitis Vinifera) Seed Extracts. Lebenson. Wiss. Technol. 2013, 53, 522–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Marchiani, R.; Bertolino, M.; Belviso, S.; Giordano, M.; Ghirardello, D.; Torri, L.; Piochi, M.; Zeppa, G. Yogurt Enrichment with Grape Pomace: Effect of Grape Cultivar on Physicochemical, Microbiological and Sensory Properties: Grape Skin Flour and Yogurt Quality. J. Food Qual. 2016, 39, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Lucera, A.; Costa, C.; Marinelli, V.; Saccotelli, M.; Del Nobile, M.; Conte, A. Fruit and Vegetable By-Products to Fortify Spreadable Cheese. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Shan, B.; Cai, Y.-Z.; Brooks, J.D.; Corke, H. Potential Application of Spice and Herb Extracts as Natural Preservatives in Cheese. J. Med. Food 2011, 14, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Felix da Silva, D.; Matumoto-Pintro, P.T.; Bazinet, L.; Couillard, C.; Britten, M. Effect of Commercial Grape Extracts on the Cheese-Making Properties of Milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 1552–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Abid, Y.; Azabou, S.; Jridi, M.; Khemakhem, I.; Bouaziz, M.; Attia, H. Storage Stability of Traditional Tunisian Butter Enriched with Antioxidant Extract from Tomato Processing By-Products. Food Chem. 2017, 233, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Çam, M.; Erdoğan, F.; Aslan, D.; Dinç, M. Enrichment of Functional Properties of Ice Cream with Pomegranate By-Products: Enrichment of Ice Cream. J. Food Sci. 2013, 78, C1543–C1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Younis, K.; Ahmad, S.; Malik, M.A. Mosambi Peel Powder Incorporation in Meat Products: Effect on Physicochemical Properties and Shelf Life Stability. Appl. Food Res. 2021, 1, 100015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Gibson, C. Sensory Evaluation of Meat of Broiler Poultry Birds Fed with Tomato-Supplemented Feed. Am. Sci. Res. J. Eng. Technol. Sci. 2018, 47, 145–150. [Google Scholar]
  132. Shahidi, F.; Chandrasekara, A. Millet Grain Phenolics and Their Role in Disease Risk Reduction and Health Promotion: A Review. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 570–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Tekgül, Y.; Baysal, T. Comparative Evaluation of Quality Properties and Volatile Profiles of Lemon Peels Subjected to Different Drying Techniques. J. Food Process Eng. 2018, 41, e12902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Ergezer, H.; Serdaroğlu, M. Antioxidant Potential of Artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.) Byproducts Extracts in Raw Beef Patties during Refrigerated Storage. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2018, 12, 982–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Andrés, A.I.; Petrón, M.J.; Adámez, J.D.; López, M.; Timón, M.L. Food By-Products as Potential Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Additives in Chill Stored Raw Lamb Patties. Meat Sci. 2017, 129, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Bryant, C.; Barnett, J. Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat: A Systematic Review. Meat Sci. 2018, 143, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Amofa-Diatuo, T.; Anang, D.M.; Barba, F.J.; Tiwari, B.K. Development of New Apple Beverages Rich in Isothiocyanates by Using Extracts Obtained from Ultrasound-Treated Cauliflower by-Products: Evaluation of Physical Properties and Consumer Acceptance. J. Food Compost. Anal. 2017, 61, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Wedamulla, N.E.; Fan, M.; Choi, Y.-J.; Kim, E.-K. Citrus Peel as a Renewable Bioresource: Transforming Waste to Food Additives. J. Funct. Foods 2022, 95, 105163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Combest, S.; Warren, C.; Patterson, M. Upcycling Brewers’ Spent Grain: The Development of Muffins and Biomarker Response after Consuming Muffins for 8-Weeks in Healthy Adults from Randomized-Controlled Trial. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2020, 4, 4140745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Bianchi, F.; Tolve, R.; Rainero, G.; Bordiga, M.; Brennan, C.S.; Simonato, B. Technological, Nutritional and Sensory Properties of Pasta Fortified with Agro-industrial By-products: A Review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 4356–4366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Cuomo, F.; Trivisonno, M.C.; Iacovino, S.; Messia, M.C.; Marconi, E. Sustainable Re-Use of Brewer’s Spent Grain for the Production of High Protein and Fibre Pasta. Foods 2022, 11, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Ginindza, A.; Solomon, W.K.; Shelembe, J.S.; Nkambule, T.P. Valorisation of Brewer’s Spent Grain Flour (BSGF) through Wheat-Maize-BSGF Composite Flour Bread: Optimization Using D-Optimal Mixture Design. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Bertagnolli, S.M.M.; Silveira, M.L.R.; Fogaça, A.d.O.; Umann, L.; Penna, N.G. Bioactive Compounds and Acceptance of Cookies Made with Guava Peel Flour. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 34, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Boff, J.M.; Strasburg, V.J.; Ferrari, G.T.; de Oliveira Schmidt, H.; Manfroi, V.; de Oliveira, V.R. Chemical, Technological, and Sensory Quality of Pasta and Bakery Products Made with the Addition of Grape Pomace Flour. Foods 2022, 11, 3812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Ungureanu-Iuga, M.; Dimian, M.; Mironeasa, S. Development and Quality Evaluation of Gluten-Free Pasta with Grape Peels and Whey Powders. Lebenson. Wiss. Technol. 2020, 130, 109714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Begum, T.; Islam, Z.K.; Rana Siddiki, M.S.; Habib, R.; Rashid, H.U. Preparation of Fermented Beverage from Whey-Based Watermelon (Citrullus Lanatus) Juice. J. Dairy. Foods Home Sci. 2019, 38, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Marchiani, R.; Bertolino, M.; Ghirardello, D.; McSweeney, P.L.H.; Zeppa, G. Physicochemical and Nutritional Qualities of Grape Pomace Powder-Fortified Semi-Hard Cheeses. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 1585–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Gaglio, R.; Barbaccia, P.; Barbera, M.; Restivo, I.; Attanzio, A.; Maniaci, G.; Di Grigoli, A.; Francesca, N.; Tesoriere, L.; Bonanno, A.; et al. The Use of Winery By-Products to Enhance the Functional Aspects of the Fresh Ovine “Primosale” Cheese. Foods 2021, 10, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Mercadante, A.Z.; Capitani, C.D.; Decker, E.A.; Castro, I.A. Effect of Natural Pigments on the Oxidative Stability of Sausages Stored under Refrigeration. Meat Sci. 2010, 84, 718–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Huda, A.; Parveen, S.; Sajad, A.R.; Akhter, R.; Hassan, M. Effect of Incorporation of Apple Pomace on the Physico-Chemical, Sensory and Textural Properties of Mutton Nuggets. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2004, 2, 974–983. [Google Scholar]
  151. Tremlova, B.; Havlova, L.; Benes, P.; Zemancova, J.; Buchtova, H.; Tesikova, K.; Dordevic, S.; Dordevic, D. Vegetarian “Sausages” with the Addition of Grape Flour. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Liu, H.; Xu, X.; Cui, H.; Xu, J.; Yuan, Z.; Liu, J.; Li, C.; Li, J.; Zhu, D. Plant-Based Fermented Beverages and Key Emerging Processing Technologies. Food Rev. Int. 2022, 38, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. García-Lomillo, J.; González-SanJosé, M.L.; Del Pino-García, R.; Rivero-Pérez, M.D.; Muñiz-Rodríguez, P. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Wine Byproducts and Their Potential Uses in the Food Industry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 12595–12602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Gasiński, A.; Kawa-Rygielska, J.; Mikulski, D.; Kłosowski, G.; Głowacki, A. Application of White Grape Pomace in the Brewing Technology and Its Impact on the Concentration of Esters and Alcohols, Physicochemical Parameteres and Antioxidative Properties of the Beer. Food Chem. 2022, 367, 130646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Pérez-Bibbins, B.; Torrado-Agrasar, A.; Salgado, J.M.; Oliveira, R.P.d.S.; Domínguez, J.M. Potential of Lees from Wine, Beer and Cider Manufacturing as a Source of Economic Nutrients: An Overview. Waste Manag. 2015, 40, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Al-Obadi, M.; Ayad, H.; Pokharel, S.; Ayari, M.A. Perspectives on Food Waste Management: Prevention and Social Innovations. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 31, 190–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. United Nations Environment Programme. Food Waste Index Report 2021; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2021; ISBN 978-92-807-3868-1. [Google Scholar]
  158. Carmona-Cabello, M.; Garcia, I.L.; Leiva-Candia, D.; Dorado, M.P. Valorization of Food Waste Based on Its Composition through the Concept of Biorefinery. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2018, 14, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. The World Counts. 2023. Available online: https://www.theworldcounts.com/challenges/people-and-poverty/hunger-and-obesity/food-waste-statistics (accessed on 20 June 2023).
  160. Elgarahy, A.M.; Eloffy, M.G.; Alengebawy, A.; El-Sherif, D.M.; Gaballah, M.S.; Elwakeel, K.Z.; El-Qelish, M. Sustainable Management of Food Waste; Pre-Treatment Strategies, Techno-Economic Assessment, Bibliometric Analysis, and Potential Utilizations: A Systematic Review. Environ. Res. 2023, 225, 115558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Pérez-Marroquín, X.A.; Estrada-Fernández, A.G.; García-Ceja, A.; Aguirre-Álvarez, G.; León-López, A. Agro-Food Waste as an Ingredient in Functional Beverage Processing: Sources, Functionality, Market and Regulation. Foods 2023, 12, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Alara, O.R.; Abdurahman, N.H.; Ukaegbu, C.I. Extraction of Phenolic Compounds: A Review. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2021, 4, 200–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Dey, G.; Sireswar, S. Tailoring Functional Beverages from Fruits and Vegetables for Specific Disease Conditions-Are We There Yet? Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 2034–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Santagata, R.; Zucaro, A.; Viglia, S.; Ripa, M.; Tian, X.; Ulgiati, S. Assessing the Sustainability of Urban Eco-Systems through Emergy-Based Circular Economy Indicators. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 109, 105859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Dahiya, S.; Kumar, A.N.; Shanthi Sravan, J.; Chatterjee, S.; Sarkar, O.; Mohan, S.V. Food Waste Biorefinery: Sustainable Strategy for Circular Bioeconomy. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 248, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Galali, Y.; Omar, Z.A.; Sajadi, S.M. Biologically Active Components in By-Products of Food Processing. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 3004–3022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Capanoglu, E.; Nemli, E.; Tomas-Barberan, F. Novel Approaches in the Valorization of Agricultural Wastes and Their Applications. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 6787–6804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Gómez-García, R.; Campos, D.A.; Aguilar, C.N.; Madureira, A.R.; Pintado, M. Valorisation of Food Agro-Industrial by-Products: From the Past to the Present and Perspectives. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 299, 113571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 2. General scheme of valorization of agri-food by-products in the circular economy.
Figure 2. General scheme of valorization of agri-food by-products in the circular economy.
Agriculture 13 01559 g002
Table 1. Nutritional improvement in products with the addition of agri-food by-products.
Table 1. Nutritional improvement in products with the addition of agri-food by-products.
IndustryProductIncorporated Agri-Food
By-Product
Nutritional ValueReferences
BakeryBreadMango peel powder
Green banana powder
Pea powder
Chickpea powder
Banana peel powder
Increased dietary fiber and carotenoid content
Increased polyphenol content and antioxidant properties
Increased protein, dietary fiber, mineral, antioxidant activity and β-carotene contents
Increased protein, resistant starch and dietary fiber content
Srivastava et al. [104]
Ajila et al. [105]
Martins et al. [106]
Meral et al. [107]
CookiesWatermelon rind powderIncreased dietary fiber
Decreased glycemic index
Increased phenolic content and the antioxidant activity
Hussain et al. [108]
MuffinsOrange bagasse
Apple skin powder
Sour cherry pomace
Strawberry, raspberry pomace
Goji berry by-product
Increased dietary fiber
Increased antioxidant capacity
Increased total phenolic content
Decreased glycemic index
Increase satiety
Regulate long-term energy balance
Romero-Lopez et al. [109]
Rupasinghe et al. [110]
Ramírez-Maganda et al. [111]
Bajerska et al. [112]
SnackDate fruit paste
Figs fruit paste
Increased protein
Increased dietary fiber
Rich in thiamin, Ca, Mg, Zn
Ibrahim et al. [102]
CakePotato peel powder
Apple, orange, and carrot pomace
Increased protein content
Increased dietary fiber content
Increased fiber content
Increased viscosity
Increased fiber, protein, carbohydrates, and sensory acceptability
Increased phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity
Increased total anthocyanins
Jeddou et al. [113]
Kirbas et al. [114]
BiscuitsFinger millet seed coat matter
Legume flour (chickpea flour, pigeon pea, mung bean flour and cowpea flour)
Apple pomace
Grape pomace
Apple, melon by-products
Increased protein, dietary fiber and calcium contents
Increased fiber and phenolic compounds
Decreased dialyzed glucose
Increased fiber, phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity
Increased anthocyanins, phenolic and antioxidant capacity
Increased fiber content
Krishnan et al. [115]
Alongi et al. [116]
Colantuono et al. [117]
Theagarajan et al. [118]
de Toledo et al. [119]
DairyDairy beverageOlive vegetable waterIncreased antioxidant activity
Source of phenols
Servili et al. [120]
Fermented milkApple pomace
Wine pomace extract
Grape marc flour
Wine pomace extract and flour
Source of protein
Probiotic protection
Texturizing agent
Source of fiber
Source of phenols
Increased antioxidant capacity
Colorant agent
Issar et al. [121]
Aliakbarian et al. [122]
YogurtGrape seed extract
Grape skin flour
Texturizing agent
Increased phenols content
Colorant agent
Yogurt’s syneresis level was considerably reduced
Maintained textural and gelling formation
Chouchouli et al. [123]
Marchiani et al. [124]
CheesePeer/apple stones
Orange by-products
Pomegranate peel
Tomato peel
Grape seed
Grape pomace
Wine pomace, skin and seed extract
Increased phenols content
Probiotic protection
Texturizing agent
Increased antioxidant capacity
Increased antimicrobial capacity
Lucera et al. [125]
Shan et al. [126]
Da Silva et al. [127]
ButterTomato peelIncreased antioxidant capacityAbid et al. [128]
Ice creamPomegranate peelTexturizing agent
Increased phenols content
Increased antioxidant capacity
Colorant agent
Cam et al. [129]
MeatChicken meat
Patties
Chickens thigh
Mosambi peel powderIncreased antioxidant capacity
Anti-bacterial agent
Increased microflora
Younis et al. [130]
Gibson [131]
Pork ground
Meatballs
Sausages
Tomato peel
Grape seed
Increased antioxidant capacityShahidi [132]
Shrimp
Tuna
Pomegranate peelIncreased antioxidant capacity
Anti-bacterial agent
Enhanced meat flavor and color
Tekgül and Baysal [133]
Beef meatballs, SausagesPomegranate peel
Orange peel
Increased antioxidant capacity
Anti-bacterial agent
Ergezer [134]
Lamb meat
Patties
Tomato pomace
Grape pomace
Olive pomace
Tomato pamace
Pomegranate pomace
Increased antioxidants
Anti-bacterial agent
Andrés et al. [135]
Bryant and Barnett [136]
BeverageApple juicePomegranate peelIncreased antioxidant capacity
Anti-bacterial agent
Enhanced juice flavor and color
Amofa-Diatuo et al. [137]
Carrot juiceOrange pulp and peelIncreased antioxidant capacityWedamulla et al. [138]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rațu, R.N.; Veleșcu, I.D.; Stoica, F.; Usturoi, A.; Arsenoaia, V.N.; Crivei, I.C.; Postolache, A.N.; Lipșa, F.D.; Filipov, F.; Florea, A.M.; et al. Application of Agri-Food By-Products in the Food Industry. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1559. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081559

AMA Style

Rațu RN, Veleșcu ID, Stoica F, Usturoi A, Arsenoaia VN, Crivei IC, Postolache AN, Lipșa FD, Filipov F, Florea AM, et al. Application of Agri-Food By-Products in the Food Industry. Agriculture. 2023; 13(8):1559. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081559

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rațu, Roxana Nicoleta, Ionuț Dumitru Veleșcu, Florina Stoica, Alexandru Usturoi, Vlad Nicolae Arsenoaia, Ioana Cristina Crivei, Alina Narcisa Postolache, Florin Daniel Lipșa, Feodor Filipov, Andreea Mihaela Florea, and et al. 2023. "Application of Agri-Food By-Products in the Food Industry" Agriculture 13, no. 8: 1559. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081559

APA Style

Rațu, R. N., Veleșcu, I. D., Stoica, F., Usturoi, A., Arsenoaia, V. N., Crivei, I. C., Postolache, A. N., Lipșa, F. D., Filipov, F., Florea, A. M., Chițea, M. A., & Brumă, I. S. (2023). Application of Agri-Food By-Products in the Food Industry. Agriculture, 13(8), 1559. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081559

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop