Next Article in Journal
Study on Revealing Peanut-Related Disease Prevention Gene Clusters via Whole Transcriptome Sequencing
Previous Article in Journal
VGNet: A Lightweight Intelligent Learning Method for Corn Diseases Recognition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Opinion

The Impacts of Elevated CO2 Levels on Environmental Risk of Heavy Metal Pollution in Agricultural Soils: Applicable Remediation Approaches for Integrated Benefits

1
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
2
Environmental Engineering College, Nanjing Polytechnic Institute, Nanjing 210048, China
3
Joint International Research Centre for Critical Zone Science-University of Leeds and Nanjing University, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
4
School of Geomatics Science and Technology, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
5
Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China, Nanjing 210042, China
6
Quanzhou Institute for Environment Protection Industry, Nanjing University, Quanzhou 362000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agriculture 2023, 13(8), 1607; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081607
Submission received: 12 June 2023 / Revised: 15 July 2023 / Accepted: 8 August 2023 / Published: 14 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Soils)

Abstract

:
Heavy metal pollution in agricultural fields is a serious health concern because of the high bioavailability and persistent toxicity of heavy metals. Much progress has recently been made with respect to elucidating the impacts of climate change (e.g., elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations) on the environmental behavior of heavy metal pollutants and the associated ecological and health risks. The microbiological responses to elevated CO2 levels are primarily mediated by the C balance in agricultural activities; however, the underlying mechanisms involved in plant–soil–microbe interactions under heavy metal stress are still unclear. Thus, in this study, the challenges and perspectives with regard to controlling heavy metal pollution and optimizing crop yields while reducing greenhouse emissions in agricultural ecosystems responsive to elevated CO2 levels are discussed. Considering the integrated benefits of intensive agriculture and food security under a future changing climate, the summarized findings provided in this study may help to develop applicable remediation approaches for sustainably managing heavy metal polluted soils.

1. Introduction

Soil is the largest organic carbon (C) reservoir in terrestrial ecosystems and plays a key role in regulating the global carbon cycle and atmospheric CO2 concentrations. The carbon stock in soil is approximately three times that of the vegetation carbon pool and twice that of the stock of carbon in the atmosphere [1]. Soil is also a source and a sink of trace greenhouse gases (GHG), such as CH4 and N2O, in the atmosphere [2]. As an important source of global GHG emissions, agricultural activities account for 1.4–1.7 Gt of CO2-Ce emissions per year (on average) and 10–12% of total anthropogenic GHG emissions [3]. Thus, any minor changes in soil environments will greatly affect C and N transformations in agricultural ecosystems, bringing consequences of uncertain impacts on food security and environmental sustainability in a changing climate.
The global food and agricultural industries are challenged by various issues, the most important of which concerns enhancing soil productivity such that it meets the food demand of an increasing global population. In agriculture, the pollution of the environment with heavy metals is unambiguously becoming a widely common problem for food safety [4,5,6]. Heavy metal pollution predominantly occurs as compound pollution stemming from many complex sources, often involving more than one metal. Soils are the main sink for contaminants, and heavy metals are highly likely to accumulate in areas of anthropogenic influence, such as areas of agricultural intensification [7,8]. In particular, heavy metals can enter the human body through the soil–crop–food chain [9,10], thereby threatening human health globally.

2. Impacts of Elevated CO2 Levels on the Environmental Behavior of Heavy Metal Pollutants

The trend of global climate change is persistent and seemingly inevitable [11]. The atmospheric CO2 level has risen from ~ 280 ppm in preindustrial times to the current level of ~400 ppm. The latest Six Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC AR6) shows that the atmospheric CO2 level will likely reach 600 ppm by the end of this century [12]. Soil pH influences the chemical properties and mobility of heavy metals in agricultural soils. Excess heavy metals can also decrease the uptake of macro- and micronutrients by plants [13]. Previous studies have shown that the combined impacts of elevated CO2 concentrations and heavy metal pollution can affect crop quality [14,15,16] and increase the bioavailability of heavy metals via lowering soil pH [17,18].
Recent research has demonstrated that elevated CO2 levels can lead to higher concentrations of dissolved As in soil pore water [19]. Elevated CO2 levels can also increase Cd retention in amorphous Fe oxides in soils while promoting the binding of Cd to low-crystalline Fe fractions deposited on surfaces of roots [20]. Plants have evolved various resistance mechanisms to alleviate the toxicity of heavy metals, but the detrimental impacts of these metals on plant growth are observed even at low concentrations [21]. Moreover, rising CO2 concentrations have also been reported to dramatically alter plant–soil feedback (i.e., root secretion processes) and soil fertility maintenance (i.e., soil organic C dynamics) [22,23,24], which may influence the capacity of croplands to produce sufficient amounts of food [25].
As one of the most toxic heavy metals, Cd mainly accumulates in crop grains via the root uptake pathway. Evidence shows that about 15% of soil Cd can enter into rice grains, and up to 3.19% can be transferred from rice grains to the human body [26]. In one study, it was shown that under conditions of elevated CO2 levels, the accumulation of Cd and Pb in rice grains increased by 48.4–75.4% and 20.5–39.1%, respectively [18]. These serious impacts of elevated CO2 levels on the mobilization, bioavailability, and accumulation of heavy metals in agricultural soils will greatly increase the risk of consuming heavy metals via crop grains (Figure 1).

3. The Applicable Approaches for Mitigating Heavy Metal Accumulation in Crop Grains

The mobilization and bioavailability of heavy metals in soils significantly affect such metals’ uptake and accumulation in plant roots, leaves, and crop grains, precipitating a collective impact on food security and human health risk. Therefore, it is critical to reduce the heavy metal content in crop plants in order to mitigate risks under elevated CO2 conditions. In general, the applicable remediation approaches for heavy metal pollution in soils mainly include physical, chemical, and bio-remediation; additionally, photocatalytic applications have recently been used for the highly reactive degradation of organic pollutants [27,28]. Previous reviews have summarized several existing cost-effective management options for mitigating heavy metal accumulation in agricultural soils, including chemical remediation via the use of soil amendments (e.g., biochar, compost/plant residues, and liming materials), co-planting with hyperaccumulators, and water/fertilization management in heavy metal polluted paddy fields [29,30].
Recent studies suggest that managing well-cultivated crops is a promising method for developing climate-smart and productivity-sufficient agriculture ecosystems [31,32,33]. Generally, sustainable yield improvements for staple crops should be achieved without concomitantly lowering food quality and increasing GHG emissions or depleting soil fertility. To achieve this goal in heavy metal polluted soils, for example, weakly accumulative cultivars of crops can potentially decrease the phyto-availability of soil heavy metals in agriculture [34,35,36]. The incorporation of biochar and crop residues (e.g., wheat/maize straw) into soils is a well-known agricultural practice used to enhance soil fertility [37,38]. The combination of biochar and zerovalent iron (ZVI) as a soil ameliorant can effectively immobilize Cd in the soil, but it can also enhance Fe and Zn accumulation in rice grain by 11% and 8%, respectively [39]. In anaerobic environments, such as submerged paddy soils, there are significant differences among rice cultivars in terms of grain Pb content [40]. Under elevated CO2 conditions, Indica rice has a higher yield response (20.4%) than Japonica rice (12.7%) [41]. Thus, the management of cultivars with low accumulation and high CO2 responses constitutes an attractive potential method of achieving low accumulation in grains without reducing yields.
Soil microorganisms inhabit the rhizosphere of crop plants, which can play a key role in mediating nutrient cycling (e.g., nitrogen fixation and phosphorus solubilization) and improving tolerance to stress (e.g., drought, pathogen infection, and hazardous contamination). Microbial remediation has recently attracted interest because many soil microbes are tolerant of heavy metals, leading to a reduction in the content of heavy metals in soils through the following main mechanisms: biosorption, bioaccumulation, complexation, and biomineralization [42,43,44,45,46]. It should be noted that the application of microbial remediation holds enormous potential to mitigate heavy metals due to its high efficiency, cost-effectiveness, eco-friendliness, etc. However, short-term or long-term exposure to heavy metals may inhibit microbial activity, specifically via causing changes in microbial biomass carbon, basal respiration, and metabolic entropy (qCO2) [47,48,49]. Previous studies have demonstrated that the selective inhibition of N2O reductase can enhance N2O production in soil polluted with heavy metals, which may have consequences relating to the contribution of agriculture to the accumulation of atmospheric N2O concentrations [50,51]. It has been confirmed that the presence of heavy metals can precipitate a decrease in microbial abundance and diversity, leading to altered community structures [46]. Evidence also shows that heavy metal pollution can inhibit CO2 emission but enhance CH4 emission [52,53]. Therefore, trade-offs relating to the application of microbial remediation approaches are expected in intensive agriculture due to the insidious effects of heavy metal pollution on specific microbial communities, ultimately influencing C/N cycling and GHG emissions (Figure 2).

4. Perspectives

Agricultural intensification is a globally common practice for increasing food production using limited sources (e.g., water, fertilizer, and energy). The increase in atmospheric CO2 concentrations directly affects plant photosynthesis, water utilization, and nutrient uptake [54,55,56]. Numerous studies have highlighted the positive/negative effects of ‘CO2 fertilization’ on plant growth and crop productivity in intensive agriculture. However, there are few systematic assessments of the impacts of environmental pollution and climate change (i.e., elevated CO2 concentrations and global warming) on plant physiological responses, root traits, and microbial dynamics in plant–soil systems.
Regarding plant–soil-systems-based investigations, isotope tracing is commonly used to estimate photosynthetic C assimilation and belowground C allocation. Nevertheless, commercial 13CO2 isotope labeling for an entire growth period is costly. It is also limited by the availability of appropriate equipment (i.e., gas-tight plant growth chambers) providing well-controlled, continuous, near-natural conditions. In this regard, we highlight one research priority that needs to be addressed to improve our understanding of the impact of well-cultivated crop management on heavy metal translocation in plant–soil systems. The presence of heavy metals may change the patterns of new C proportions allocated to root, soil, and microbial metabolism. Therefore, it is critical to explore the potential of elevated CO2-driven C newly allocated to belowground locations in heavy metal polluted soils.
An increasing content of heavy metals is being found—and being found to be persistent—in agricultural soils due to chemical fertilizer usage, livestock manure and sludge application, sewage irrigation, and atmospheric deposition [57,58,59]. Thus, it is essential to prevent and control the release of heavy metals into the soil environment and ensure the sustainability of agricultural systems. Nevertheless, various remediation strategies have been reported, such as phytoremediation [60,61], the use of soil amendments [62,63,64], specific microbial communities-driven remediation [65], and combined remediation approaches [66] to address the potential environmental risks posed by heavy metals in intensive agriculture.
Generally, soil microbes play a vital role in the decomposition of SOC, thus influencing GHG fluxes [67,68]. Evidence shows that the microbial degradation of plant litter and residues in warming soils can release more CO2 back into the atmosphere [69]. Potential CO2 release, however, may also be stimulated by plant–soil interactions and their associated microbes responsive to agricultural management practices [70,71]. Dark CO2 fixation (the non-phototrophic assimilation of CO2) by specific microbial communities can recycle some of the released soil CO2 [72]. However, there is still a gap with respect to evaluating the contribution of dark CO2 fixation by microbes, especially in soils contaminated with single or multiple pollutants (e.g., heavy metals, organic pollutants, antibiotic residues, and antibiotic resistance genes).
Additionally, with respect to the application of microbial remediation in heavy metal polluted soils, it is imperative to optimize the microbe-mediated C management strategy and improve agricultural resilience to the changing climate, ultimately contributing to global C neutralization. With the collective impacts of elevated CO2 levels and heavy metal pollution on agricultural productivity, more attempts are needed to regulate the allocation of photosynthates to optimize plant–soil–microbe interactions. Moreover, the underlying mechanism linking microbe-mediated C balance and the environmental behavior of soil pollutants is also poorly understood. Thus far, it is still challenging to decipher the plant–soil–microbe interactions in soils polluted by heavy metals in the background of future changing CO2 concentrations.

5. Conclusions

Agricultural soil pollution via heavy metals poses one of the biggest challenges to food safety and sustainability, particularly with respect to staple crops. Elevated CO2 concentrations may aggravate the impacts of heavy metal pollution on the plant–soil–microbe interactions in agricultural systems. This study demonstrates the impacts of elevated CO2 levels on the mobilization, bioavailability, and accumulation of heavy metals in agricultural soils. To minimize the human health risks related to the dietary intake of accumulated heavy metals from crop grains, in this study, we have summarized alternative options for effective remediation strategies, such as cultivar management and the application of soil ameliorants and microbial community-driven remediation approaches in intensive agriculture. We suggest that there is a need to develop and manage well-cultivated crops with genetic features enabling low accumulation. Selective cultivars (e.g., low-Cd rice varieties) with high yields that are responsive to elevated CO2 levels, if harnessed appropriately, can provide sustainable yield improvements for staple crops. Considering the integrated benefits of intensive agriculture and food security in the background of a future changing climate, our findings may help to develop climate-smart and productivity-sufficient agriculture ecosystems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.W.; resources, Q.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, X.W. and Q.Z.; writing—review and editing, Q.Z., N.S. and H.G.; funding acquisition, X.W., Q.Z. and N.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42107004, No. 42071392, No. 42071050), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M681553), and the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20220036).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We really appreciate the editors and anonymous reviewers for their meaningful suggestions for improving our manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Sanderman, J.; Hengl, T.; Fiske, G.J. Fiske, Soil carbon debt of 12,000 years of human land use. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 9575–9580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Salinger, M.J. Agriculture’s influence on climate during the Holocene. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2007, 142, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Burney, J.A.; Davis, S.J.; Lobell, D.B. Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 12052–12057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, P.; Chen, H.; Kopittke, P.M.; Zhao, F.J. Cadmium contamination in agricultural soils of China and the impact on food safety. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 249, 1038–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Aslam, M.W.; Ali, W.; Meng, B.; Abrar, M.M.; Lu, B.; Qin, C.; Zhao, L.; Feng, X. Mercury contamination status of rice cropping system in Pakistan and associated health risks. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lu, C.; Zhang, L.; Tang, Z.; Huang, X.Y.; Ma, J.F.; Zhao, F.J. Producing cadmium-free Indica rice by overexpressing OsHMA3. Environ. Int. 2019, 126, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tang, W.; Su, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhong, H. Effects of Farming Activities on the Biogeochemistry of Mercury in Rice-Paddy Soil Systems. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2019, 102, 635–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. He, M.; Shen, H.; Li, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, F.; Zhao, K.; Liu, X.; Wendroth, O.; Xu, J. Ten-year regional monitoring of soil-rice grain contamination by heavy metals with implications for target remediation and food safety. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 244, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Liu, J.; Qian, M.; Cai, G.; Yang, J.; Zhu, Q. Uptake and translocation of Cd in different rice cultivars and the relation with Cd accumulation in rice grain. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 143, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Feng, J.; Shen, R.F.; Shao, J.F. Transport of cadmium from soil to grain in cereal crops: A review. Pedosphere 2021, 31, 3–10. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hoegh-Guldberg, O.; Jacob, D.; Taylor, M.; Guillén Bolaños, T.; Bindi, M.; Brown, S.; Camilloni, I.A.; Diedhiou, A.; Djalante, R.; Ebi, K.; et al. The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5 degrees C. Science 2019, 365, eaaw6974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Pörtner, H.O.; Roberts, D.C.; Adams, H.; Adler, C.; Aldunce, P.; Ali, E.; Begum, R.A.; Betts, R.; Kerr, R.B.; Biesbroek, R.; et al. (Eds.) Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2022; p. 3056. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rochayati, S.; Laing, G.D.; Rinklebe, J.; Meissner, R.; Verloo, M. Use of reactive phosphate rocks as fertilizer on acid upland soils in Indonesia: Accumulation of cadmium and zinc in soils and shoots of maize plants. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2011, 174, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. AbdElgawad, H.; Schoenaers, S.; Zinta, G.; Hassan, Y.M.; Abdel-Mawgoud, M.; Alkhalifah, D.H.M.; Hozzein, W.N.; Asard, H.; Abuelsoud, W. Soil arsenic toxicity differentially impacts C3 (barley) and C4 (maize) crops under future climate atmospheric CO2. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 414, 125331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Blanco, A.; Högy, P.; Zikeli, S.; Pignata, M.L.; Rodriguez, J.H. Assessment of elevated CO2 concentrations and heat stress episodes in soybean cultivars growing in heavy metal polluted soils: Crop nutritional quality and food safety. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 303, 119123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dong, J.; Hunt, J.; Delhaize, E.; Zheng, S.J.; Jin, C.W.; Tang, C. Impacts of elevated CO2 on plant resistance to nutrient deficiency and toxic ions via root exudates: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 142434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, H.; Zhu, J.; Zhou, H.; Sun, Y.; Yin, Y.; Pei, D.; Ji, R.; Wu, J.; Wang, X. Elevated CO2 levels affects the concentrations of copper and cadmium in crops grown in soil contaminated with heavy metals under fully open-air field conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 6997–7003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Ai, F.; Du, W.; Yin, Y.; Guo, H. Climatic CO2 level-driven changes in the bioavailability, accumulation, and health risks of Cd and Pb in paddy soil–rice systems. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 324, 121396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, X.; Wang, D.; Tao, Y.; Shen, M.; Ma, C.; Cai, C.; Song, L.; Yin, B.; Zhu, C. Does elevated CO2 enhance the arsenic uptake by rice? Yes or maybe: Evidences from FACE experiments. Chemosphere 2023, 327, 138543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, X.; Wang, D.; Tao, Y.; Shen, M.; Wei, W.; Cai, C.; Ding, C.; Li, J.; Song, L.; Yin, B.; et al. Effects of elevated CO2 on the Cd uptake by rice in Cd-contaminated paddy soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 442, 130140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dias, M.C.; Monteiro, C.; Moutinho-Pereira, J.; Correia, C.; Gonçalves, B.; Santos, C. Cadmium toxicity affects photosynthesis and plant growth at different levels. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 1281–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pugnaire, F.I.; Morillo, J.A.; Peñuelas, J.; Reich, P.B.; Bardgett, R.D.; Gaxiola, A.; Wardle, D.A.; Van Der Putten, W.H. Climate change effects on plant-soil feedbacks and consequences for biodiversity and functioning of terrestrial ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaaz1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Cheng, L.; Zhu, J.; Chen, G.; Zheng, X.; Oh, N.H.; Rufty, T.W.; Richter, D.D.; Hu, S. Atmospheric CO2 enrichment facilitates cation release from soil. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Qiao, L.; Wang, X.; Smith, P.; Fan, J.; Lu, Y.; Emmett, B.; Li, R.; Dorling, S.; Chen, H.; Liu, S.; et al. Soil quality both increases crop production and improves resilience to climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2022, 12, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hu, S.; Chen, W.; Tong, K.; Wang, Y.; Jing, L.; Wang, Y.; Yang, L. Response of rice growth and leaf physiology to elevated CO2 concentrations: A meta-analysis of 20-year FACE studies. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 807, 151017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, T.; Chang, Q.; Yuan, X.; Li, J.; Ayoko, G.A.; Frost, R.L.; Chen, H.; Zhang, X.; Song, Y.; Song, W. Cadmium transfer from contaminated soils to the human body through rice consumption in southern Jiangsu Province, China. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2017, 19, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Behnood, R.; Sodeifian, G. Synthesis of N doped-CQDs/Ni doped-ZnO nanocomposites for visible light photodegradation of organic pollutants. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Behnood, R.; Sodeifian, G. Novel ZnCo2O4 embedded with S, N-CQDs as efficient visible-light photocatalyst. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2021, 405, 112971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Z.; Liang, Y.; Hu, H.; Shaheen, S.M.; Zhong, H.; Tack, F.M.; Wu, M.; Li, Y.F.; Gao, Y.; Rinklebe, J.; et al. Speciation, transportation, and pathways of cadmium in soil-rice systems: A review on the environmental implications and remediation approaches for food safety. Environ. Int. 2021, 156, 106749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wan, X.; Zeng, W.; Cai, W.; Lei, M.; Liao, X.; Chen, T. Progress and future prospects in co-planting with hyperaccumulators: Application to the sustainable use of agricultural soil contaminated by arsenic, cadmium, and nickel. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Techonl. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tian, Z.; Wang, J.W.; Li, J.; Han, B. Designing future crops: Challenges and strategies for sustainable agriculture. Plant J. 2021, 105, 1165–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Saad, N.S.M.; Neik, T.X.; Thomas, W.J.; Amas, J.C.; Cantila, A.Y.; Craig, R.J.; Edwards, D.; Batley, J. Advancing designer crops for climate resilience through an integrated genomics approach. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2022, 67, 102220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Krug, A.S.; BMDrummond, E.; Van Tassel, D.L.; Warschefsky, E.J. The next era of crop domestication starts now. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2205769120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sui, F.Q.; Chang, J.D.; Tang, Z.; Liu, W.J.; Huang, X.Y.; Zhao, F.J. Nramp5 expression and functionality likely explain higher cadmium uptake in rice than in wheat and maize. Plant Soil 2018, 433, 377–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, F.J.; Tang, Z.; Song, J.J.; Huang, X.Y.; Wang, P. Toxic metals and metalloids: Uptake, transport, detoxification, phytoremediation, and crop improvement for safer food. Mol. Plant 2022, 15, 27–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sun, L.; Tan, Y.; Chen, C. The road toward Cd-safe rice: From mass selection to marker-assisted selection and genetic manipulation. Crop J. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Golia, E.E. The impact of heavy metal contamination on soil quality and plant nutrition. Sustainable management of moderate contaminated agricultural and urban soils, using low cost materials and promoting circular economy. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2023, 33, 101046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lou, Y.; Xu, M.; Wang, W.; Sun, X.; Zhao, K. Return rate of straw residue affects soil organic C sequestration by chemical fertilization. Soil Tillage Res. 2011, 113, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Khum-in, V.; Suk-in, J.; In-ai, P.; Piaowan, K.; Phaimisap, Y.; Supanpaiboon, W.; Phenrat, T. Combining biochar and zerovalent iron (BZVI) as a paddy field soil amendment for heavy cadmium (Cd) contamination decreases Cd but increases zinc and iron concentrations in rice grains: A field-scale evaluation. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2020, 141, 222–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Norton, G.J.; Williams, P.N.; Adomako, E.E.; Price, A.H.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, F.J.; McGrath, S.; Deacon, C.M.; Villada, A.; Sommella, A.; et al. Lead in rice: Analysis of baseline lead levels in market and field collected rice grains. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 485–486, 428–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hu, S.; Wang, Y.; Yang, L. Response of rice yield traits to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration and its interaction with cultivar, nitrogen application rate and temperature: A meta-analysis of 20 years FACE studies. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 764, 142797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Verma, S.; Bhatt, P.; Verma, A.; Mudila, H.; Prasher, P.; Rene, E.R. Microbial technologies for heavy metal remediation: Effect of process conditions and current practices. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2021, 25, 1485–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pande, V.; Pandey, S.C.; Sati, D.; Bhatt, P.; Samant, M. Microbial interventions in bioremediation of heavy metal contaminants in agroecosystem. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 824084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, X.; Wu, H.; Dai, C.; Wang, X.; Wang, L.; Xu, J.; Lu, Z. Microbial interactions enhanced environmental fitness and expanded ecological niches under dibutyl phthalate and cadmium co-contamination. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 306, 119362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Saha, L.; Tiwari, J.; Bauddh, K.; Ma, Y. Recent developments in microbe–plant-based bioremediation for tackling heavy metal-polluted soils. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 731723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Guo, H.; Nasir, M.; Lv, J.; Dai, Y.; Gao, J. Understanding the variation of microbial community in heavy metals contaminated soil using high throughput sequencing. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 144, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, Y.; Shi, J.; Wang, H.; Lin, Q.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y. The influence of soil heavy metals pollution on soil microbial biomass, enzyme activity, and community composition near a copper smelter. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2007, 67, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, C.; Nie, S.; Liang, J.; Zeng, G.; Wu, H.; Hua, S.; Liu, J.; Yuan, Y.; Xiao, H.; Deng, L.; et al. Effects of heavy metals and soil physicochemical properties on wetland soil microbial biomass and bacterial community structure. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 557–558, 785–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Enya, O.; Heaney, N.; Iniama, G.; Lin, C. Effects of heavy metals on organic matter decomposition in inundated soils: Microcosm experiment and field examination. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 724, 138223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Holtan-Hartwig, L.; Bechmann, M.; Høyås, T.R.; Linjordet, R.; Bakken, L.R. Heavy metals tolerance of soil denitrifying communities: N2O dynamics. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2002, 34, 1181–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shaaban, M.; Peng, Q.A.; Bashir, S.; Wu, Y.; Younas, A.; Xu, X.; Rashti, M.R.; Abid, M.; Zafar-ul-Hye, M.; Núñez-Delgado, A.; et al. Restoring effect of soil acidity and Cu on N2O emissions from an acidic soil. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 250, 109535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ma, J.; Ullah, S.; Niu, A.; Liao, Z.; Qin, Q.; Xu, S.; Lin, C. Heavy metal pollution increases CH4 and decreases CO2 emissions due to soil microbial changes in a mangrove wetland: Microcosm experiment and field examination. Chemosphere 2021, 269, 128735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jaiswal, D.; Pandey, J. Carbon dioxide emission coupled extracellular enzyme activity at land-water interface predict C-eutrophication and heavy metal contamination in Ganga River, India. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 99, 349–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Ju, W.; Chen, J.M.; Ciais, P.; Cescatti, A.; Sardans, J.; Janssens, I.A.; Wu, M.; Berry, J.A.; et al. Recent global decline of CO2 fertilization effects on vegetation photosynthesis. Science 2020, 370, 1295–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Du, E.; Terrer, C.; Pellegrini, A.F.; Ahlström, A.; van Lissa, C.J.; Zhao, X.; Xia, N.; Wu, X.; Jackson, R.B. Global patterns of terrestrial nitrogen and phosphorus limitation. Nat. Geosci. 2020, 13, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Terrer, C.; Jackson, R.B.; Prentice, I.C.; Keenan, T.F.; Kaiser, C.; Vicca, S.; Fisher, J.B.; Reich, P.B.; Stocker, B.D.; Hungate, B.A.; et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus constrain the CO2 fertilization of global plant biomass. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2019, 9, 684–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Luo, L.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wei, D.; Zhu, Y. An inventory of trace element inputs to agricultural soils in China. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 2524–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Vácha, R. Heavy metal pollution and its effects on agriculture. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hou, D.; O’Connor, D.; Igalavithana, A.D.; Alessi, D.S.; Luo, J.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Sparks, D.L.; Yamauchi, Y.; Rinklebe, J.; Ok, Y.S. Metal contamination and bioremediation of agricultural soils for food safety and sustainability. Nature Rev. Earth Environ. 2020, 1, 366–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, Y.; Dong, Q.; Wu, D.; Yin, Y.; Du, W.; Guo, H. A 24-epibrassinolide treatment and intercropping willow with alfalfa increase the efficiency of the phytoremediation of cadmium-contaminated soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 854, 158471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, N.; Jiang, L.; Li, X.; Su, Y. Enhancing phytoremediation of arsenic-contaminated soil by agronomic practices (drip irrigation and intercropping): Influence of soil organic matter. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 891, 164463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, G.; Du, W.; Xu, M.; Ai, F.; Yin, Y.; Guo, H. Integrated assessment of Cd-contaminated paddy soil with application of combined ameliorants: A three-year field study. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2021, 107, 1236–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wang, G.; Zhang, Q.; Du, W.; Lin, R.; Li, J.; Ai, F.; Yin, Y.; Ji, R.; Wang, X.; Guo, H. In-situ immobilization of cadmium-polluted upland soil: A ten-year field study. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 207, 111275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sharma, A.; Nagpal, A.K. Soil amendments: A tool to reduce heavy metal uptake in crops for production of safe food. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2018, 17, 187–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Raturi, G.; Chaudhary, A.; Rana, V.; Mandlik, R.; Sharma, Y.; Barvkar, V.; Salvi, P.; Tripathi, D.K.; Kaur, J.; Deshmukh, R.; et al. Microbial remediation and plant-microbe interaction under arsenic pollution. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 864, 160972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, X.; Gong, Z.; Allinson, G.; Li, X.; Jia, C. Joint effects of bacterium and biochar in remediation of antibiotic-heavy metal contaminated soil and responses of resistance gene and microbial community. Chemosphere 2022, 299, 134333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bridgham, S.D.; Cadillo-Quiroz, H.; Keller, J.K.; Zhuang, Q. Methane emissions from wetlands: Biogeochemical, microbial, and modeling perspectives from local to global scales. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19, 1325–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Martins, C.S.; Nazaries, L.; Macdonald, C.A.; Anderson, I.C.; Singh, B.K. Water availability and abundance of microbial groups are key determinants of greenhouse gas fluxes in a dryland forest ecosystem. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 86, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bond-Lamberty, B.; Thomson, A. Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record. Nature 2010, 464, 579–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ray, R.L.; Griffin, R.W.; Fares, A.; Elhassan, A.; Awal, R.; Woldesenbet, S.; Risch, E. Soil CO2 emission in response to organic amendments, temperature, and rainfall. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Rahman, M.M. Carbon Dioxide Emission from Soil. Agric. Res. 2013, 2, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Akinyede, R.; Taubert, M.; Schrumpf, M.; Trumbore, S.; Küsel, K. Temperature sensitivity of dark CO2 fixation in temperate forest soils. Biogeosciences 2022, 19, 4011–4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The enhanced human health risks of consuming heavy metals in agricultural soils under elevated CO2 levels.
Figure 1. The enhanced human health risks of consuming heavy metals in agricultural soils under elevated CO2 levels.
Agriculture 13 01607 g001
Figure 2. The trade-offs in the application of the microbial remediation approach to heavy metal polluted soils in crops responsive to elevated CO2 levels.
Figure 2. The trade-offs in the application of the microbial remediation approach to heavy metal polluted soils in crops responsive to elevated CO2 levels.
Agriculture 13 01607 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Shan, N.; Guo, H. The Impacts of Elevated CO2 Levels on Environmental Risk of Heavy Metal Pollution in Agricultural Soils: Applicable Remediation Approaches for Integrated Benefits. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081607

AMA Style

Wang X, Zhang Q, Shan N, Guo H. The Impacts of Elevated CO2 Levels on Environmental Risk of Heavy Metal Pollution in Agricultural Soils: Applicable Remediation Approaches for Integrated Benefits. Agriculture. 2023; 13(8):1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081607

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xiaojie, Qian Zhang, Nan Shan, and Hongyan Guo. 2023. "The Impacts of Elevated CO2 Levels on Environmental Risk of Heavy Metal Pollution in Agricultural Soils: Applicable Remediation Approaches for Integrated Benefits" Agriculture 13, no. 8: 1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081607

APA Style

Wang, X., Zhang, Q., Shan, N., & Guo, H. (2023). The Impacts of Elevated CO2 Levels on Environmental Risk of Heavy Metal Pollution in Agricultural Soils: Applicable Remediation Approaches for Integrated Benefits. Agriculture, 13(8), 1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081607

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop