Next Article in Journal
Nosema apis and Nosema ceranae in Beehives of the Apulian Region of Italy: How Citizen Science Can Support Scientific Research
Previous Article in Journal
Wastewater Nutrient Recovery via Fungal and Nitrifying Bacteria Treatment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agriculture
Volume 14
Issue 4
10.3390/agriculture14040582
agriculture-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hot Water Treatment as a Quarantine Measure for Controlling Pratylenchus penetrans Cobb in Syngonium podophyllum Schott and Perilla frutescens Britton

by
Ga-Eul Lim
1,
Moon-Sun Heo
2 and
Min-Goo Park
1,*
1
Department of Bioenvironmental Chemistry, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
2
Research and Development Division, Goyang-Si Agricultural Technology Center, Goyang 10563, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2024, 14(4), 582; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040582
Submission received: 8 March 2024 / Revised: 5 April 2024 / Accepted: 5 April 2024 / Published: 7 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Protection, Diseases, Pests and Weeds)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Syngonium podophyllum Schott plants are increasingly being imported in Korea due to their ability to purify indoor air. Root lesion nematodes, Pratylenchus spp., are the most frequently occurring nematodes associated with S. podophyllum, leading to the disposal of plants or their return to the country of origin, due to inadequate phytosanitary treatments. We evaluated the effectiveness of hot water treatment in controlling Pratylenchus penetrans Cobb, present in S. podophyllum and Perilla frutescens Britton. The mortality rate (LT99%: the time at which 99% lethality is achieved) of P. penetrans at 44 to 52 °C water and treatment-caused plant damage were evaluated in vitro and in vivo. The in vitro test showed the LT99 at 44, 46, 48, 50, and 52 °C was 119.1, 27.0, 14.70, 1.40, and 0.48 min, respectively. The LT99 of hot water treatment on the nematodes infecting both plants was 18.4 to 1.7 min at 46 to 50 °C. S. podophyllum was undamaged at 30 days after treatment with 49 and 51 °C water for 30 min. This study demonstrates that hot water treatment is a potential phytosanitary disinfection method for Pratylenchus spp. infecting foliage plants, which can accelerate their trade by reducing incidents of disposal or return to the country of origin.

1. Introduction

Seedlings imported into the Republic of Korea occupy a large proportion of quarantine facilities. Among them, 316,000 individual Syngonium podophyllum Schott plants (Araceae, arrowhead vine) were imported from 2021 to 2023 [1]. Specifically, the import of S. podophyllum almost doubled from 2018 to 2020, from an initial 140,940 units [1]. This is because S. podophyllum is an attractive indoor ornamental plant due to its excellent ability to detoxify formaldehydes in the air [2].
Nematode infestations have become a significant concern when inspecting imported seedlings, including S. podophyllum. Notably, Pratylenchus root lesion nematodes were detected in a total of 654 cases, making them the most frequently occurring nematodes discovered during the period from 2021 to 2023 [1]. The Pratylenchus spp. detected include P. brachyurus Godfrey, P. coffeae Zimmermann, P. fallax Seinhost, P. neglectus Rensch, P. penetrans Cobb, and P. projectus Jenkins. Among them, P. penetrans ranked second among the detected nematodes, with 147 cases [1].
Pratylenchus penetrans exhibits a broad host range, affecting approximately 400 plant species [3], including ornamental plants such as roses and daylilies [4]. While this nematode is globally distributed, some countries categorize it as a pest requiring quarantine management. Paraguay has designated it as grade A1, Jordan as grade A2, and Mexico has classified it as a quarantine pest [5]. Pratylenchus penetrans is a nematode of major importance in Korea, as it causes significant economic damage in cultivated crops such as perilla and strawberries. In particular, the infection rate of P. penetrans was found to be over 55% in Geumsan and Miryang, which are the main areas for producing leaf perilla seeds. This high infection rate was especially notable during the continuous cropping period, leading to inhibited leaf growth and production [6]. Despite the use of nematicides on the host plants, complete eradication is challenging once soils are infested [7]. Therefore, it is necessary to implement effective disinfection methods to prevent P. penetrans infestations, and to maintain the potential for exporting these plants outside of Korea. Additionally, for seedlings to be accepted into Korea, phytosanitary treatments would be required to eliminate plant infestations caused by Pratylenchus spp.
The Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency in Korea mandates adherence to the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC), requiring a Probit 9 efficacy for invasive pests in imported plants, which indicates a 99.9968% mortality rate through quarantine treatments [8]. Nematodes are no exception to this standard.
Hot water treatment has been recognized as an effective control method against nematodes in seedlings worldwide [9]. For the genus Pratylenchus, treatment conditions vary based on the type of plant, such as grapevine, potato, Allium hookeri Thwaites, or ginger, but effective control of nematodes has been achieved at temperatures between 43 °C and 50 °C for 1 min to 1 h [10,11,12,13,14]. However, little research has been conducted on controlling nematodes in foliage plants, which are vulnerable to heat, and there is no prescribed treatment method to control nematodes in the plants found in Korea’s quarantine inspection according to Phytosanitary disinfestation guidelines [15]. This leads to the disposal or return of infected consignments to the country of origin. The disposal and return of imported foliage plants cause an economic loss of approximately 100 thousand US dollars per 40 ft container, increasing the distribution costs of the plants into the country. Thus, developing an effective phytosanitary treatment for these plants is an urgent issue.
In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of hot water treatment for controlling P. penetrans in S. podophyllum and Perilla frutescens Britton, which were selected as representative foliage plants and major hosts of P. penetrans in Korea, respectively. Specifically, we (1) determined the efficacy of hot water treatment on P. penetrans in vitro; (2) evaluated the effect of temperature increase in relation to the diameter and filling ratio of Syngonium roots; (3) conducted efficacy tests of hot water treatment on P. penetrans infecting S. podophyllum and P. frutescens as an in vivo test, based on the results of (1) and (2); and (4) assessed the effect of heat treatment on the quality of S. podophyllum.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Nematodes

Pratylenchus penetrans were provided by the Crop Protection Division of the Rural Development Administration in Wanju, Republic of Korea, which were propagated from P. frutescens and S. podophyllum. The nematodes were identified by a specialist in the division. Pratylenchus penetrans is characterized by a slender, cylindrical body with a distinct lip region and a feeding stylet. It is dioecious, with males having a curved tail and females having a straight tail with a vulva. Nematodes in infected hosts were separated in an environment of 25 ± 1 °C using a Baermann funnel [16]. The separated nematodes were collected, and their species and density were determined under an inverted microscope. The life stages of the nematodes used in this study were a mixture of adults and juveniles.

2.2. Efficacy of Hot Water Treatment on P. penetrans in an In Vitro Test

In order to evaluate the efficacy of hot water treatment on P. penetrans, the temperature of the 50 L constant temperature water bath (Ian Science, C-AWB1, Seoul, Republic of Korea) was set at 44, 46, 48, 50, and 52 °C. Adult female nematodes were selected after separation from P. frutescens. These nematodes were suspended in water at a concentration of 50 to 100 individuals per 1 mL and transferred to test tubes (25 mm [d] × 20 mm [h], UNI B&C, Goyang, Republic of Korea) with a perforated bottom with a 500-mesh sieve for immersion with a 1 mL micropipette; no water was left in the sieve. The nematodes were injected into the test tube, and it was immersed in the tank and maintained for 10 s, 30 s, and 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 60 min each, after the temperature inside the test tube had reached the target temperature. Separate replicates were prepared for each of the nine submersion durations at each temperature. However, when shorter submersion durations at higher temperatures killed 100% of the nematodes, we did not test the longer time intervals, such as 20 to 60 min. Water temperature was recorded using a multi-channel thermometer (LUTRON, BTM-4208SD, Taipei, Taiwan). After the treatment, the nematodes were transferred to Petri dishes with distilled water and stored at room temperature (25 °C).
The survival of the nematodes was assessed 24 h after hot water treatment. They were considered deceased when they showed no response to stimuli. All treatments were repeated in triplicate.

2.3. Effect of Temperature Increase Relative to the Diameters and Filling Ratio of S. podophyllum Roots

To monitor temperature within the roots of S. podophyllum, a multi-channel thermometer probe was inserted into the center of S. podophyllum roots. The initial temperature of the roots was set to 19 °C. The immersion was conducted in a water bath with a volume of 20.25 L, maintaining a water temperature of 50 °C. The temperatures of the roots were monitored at three points in each S. podophyllum. The three points were the thinnest, with a medium diameter, and the thickest part of each S. podophyllum root. Root diameters were measured using calipers (MITUTOYO, CD-15APX, Tokyo, Japan). Ramping time was recorded from an initial temperature of 19 °C to the target temperature of 50 °C on each root after it was immersed in the water bath.
To evaluate the effect of temperature increase depending on the filling ratio, S. podophyllum roots were designated as 0.6, 1.19, 1.28, 1.88, 2.07, 2.47, 2.67, and 4.37 g/L of the filling ratio. The ratio was defined as the root mass/volume of water in the bath (g/L). The temperature was monitored in the thickest part of each S. podophyllum root. All trials were replicated three times.

2.4. Efficacy of Hot Water Treatment on P. penetrans Infecting S. podophyllum and P. frutescens in an In Vivo Test

Pratylenchus penetrans was cultured in S. podophyllum and P. frutescens for nearly 6 months, from April to October 2023, in a greenhouse at the Rural Development Administration. The nematodes in the plants were counted prior to treatment, and those with an infestation of over 150 nematodes were treated. One plant was used for each treatment.
The temperature of the water bath was set to 46, 48, or 50 °C for P. frutescens, and 50 or 52 °C for S. podophyllum. After immersing the plants, the internal root temperature was maintained for 1, 3, 10, 20, and 40 min, starting from the point when the target temperature was reached. The temperature and duration were set based on the result of the in vitro test.
Following immersion, the roots were air-cooled for 1 h before the nematodes were extracted using the Baermann funnel method, allowing them to leach for over 24 h. After that, their mortality was assessed. All nematodes separated using the Baermann funnel method were considered surviving individuals from the hot water immersion treatment, regardless of their responsiveness to stimuli. The mortality rate was calculated by comparing the average number of nematodes separated from the untreated group with those from the treated groups. All trials were replicated three times.

2.5. Effect of Hot Water Treatment on the Quality of S. podophyllum

To evaluate the effect of hot water treatment on the quality of S. podophyllum, the plants were immersed in hot water for 0, 1, 5, 10, 15, and 30 min at 49 or 51 °C. One plant was used per treatment. The water temperature was raised by 1 °C above the target temperature of 48 and 50 °C to account for temperature deviation. After treatment, the plants were replanted in horticultural bed soil. Changes in the mass of the entire plant were recorded 30 days after replanting. The control group (0 min immersion) was subjected to the same process as the treated groups, with the exception of hot water treatment. All trials were replicated three times.

2.6. Data Analysis

The time-response effects of heat water treatment on P. penetrans in the in vitro and in vivo tests were estimated using Probit analysis [17], based on a computer program written by Ge Le Pattourel, Imperial College, London, UK and adopted by Don-Pedro (1989) [18]. In the probit parameters, ‘slope’ indicates the relationship between the time at a specific temperature and the lethality of P. penetrans. ‘df’ represents the degrees of freedom associated with the number of cases treated. LT50% and LT99% indicate the time at which 50% and 99% lethality of the nematodes is achieved, respectively. Simple regression analysis was performed to reveal the monotonically increasing trend of time according to the diameter and filling ratio of the plant’s root (SPSS ver. 23). Differences in the quality measurements of S. podophyllum among the 0-, 1-, 5-, 10-, 15-, and 30-minute treatment groups on the target temperature were estimated using ANOVA (SPSS ver. 23).

3. Results

3.1. Efficacy of Hot Water Treatment on P. penetrans in In Vitro Tests

The LT99 values of hot water treatment on P. penetrans were 119.13 min at 44 °C, 27.03 min at 46 °C, 14.70 min at 48 °C, 1.40 min at 50 °C, and 0.48 min at 52 °C, respectively (Table 1). In the 44–48 °C treatments, a mortality rate of less than 40% was observed from 10 s to 1 min. In contrast, temperatures of 50 °C and 52 °C exhibited mortality rates exceeding 80% even at 10 s, reaching 100% mortality after 3 min (Table 1, Figure 1).

3.2. Effect of Temperature Increase in Relation to Diameter and Filling Ratio of Syngonium Roots

The increase in the root diameter of S. podophyllum increased the time required to reach the target temperature, with a trend equation between the parameters of y = 13.39x − 26.111 (R2 = 0.8029) (Figure 2a). The largest root diameter used in this experiment was 12 mm. It took less than 3 min to reach the target temperature of 50 °C after immersion.
The temperature increase showed no significant relationships to the filling ratios at S. podophyllum. The p-values for the filling ratio were 0.333 for the thick diameter group, indicating the lack of a significant relationship (Figure 2b).

3.3. Efficacy of Hot Water Treatment on P. penetrans Infecting S. podophyllum and P. frutescens

The LT99 value of P. penetrans infecting S. podophyllum was 2.67 min at 50 °C, and complete mortality was observed after treatment for 1 min at 52 °C. For P. penetrans infecting P. frutescens, LT99 values of 18.42, 18.59, and 1.68 min were obtained for treatments at 46, 48, and 50 °C, respectively (Table 2). Considering that the LT99 values in the in vitro test were 27.03, 14.70, 1.40, and 0.48 min at 46, 48, 50, and 52 °C, respectively, the results of this in vivo test were comparable to those of the in vitro test.
Mortality of P. penetrans exceeding 95% was observed after 1 min at 50 °C or more for both host plants, although P. penetrans mortality above 50% was observed for both the 46 and 48 °C treatments in P. frutescens (Figure 3).
The LT99 values at 50 °C in S. podophyllum and P. frutescens were 1.68 min (confidence level, CL 1.32–2.19) and 2.67 min (CL 1.69–4.95), respectively, which did not differ significantly. This indicates there was no difference in the susceptibility of the two host plants to hot water treatment against nematodes (Table 2). Considering the LT99 of 1.40 (CL 0.90–3.16) at 50 °C in the in vitro trials (Table 1), we confirmed that similar efficacy was achieved in the in vivo condition where nematodes had infected plants.

3.4. Effect of Hot Water Treatment on Quality of S. podophyllum

At 30 days after heat treatment of S. podophyllum, there was no heat-induced damage and normal growth was confirmed (Figure 4 and Figure 5). When comparing the growth rates before and after treatment for all conditions, including the highest temperature and longest duration of 51 °C for 30 min, there were no statistically significant differences in weight due to heat stress (p > 0.05 in Table 3).

4. Discussion

The application of hot water treatment for controlling various plant parasitic nematodes, such as root lesion nematodes [10,11,13,14,19], burrowing nematodes [9,20,21,22,23], or root-knot nematodes [12,19,24,25,26,27] has been studied. This has been investigated for elimination of the nematodes in bananas [20,28], potato tubers [11], flower bulbs [27,29], vegetative seeds [30], rootstocks of roses [31], and grapevines [14,24,26]. However, determining the temperature and duration of hot water treatment for P. penetrans in the roots of S. podophyllum and P. frutescens during quarantine was determined for the first time. Hot water treatment proved effective against the quarantine pest P. penetrans in an in vitro test. At temperatures of 50 °C and 52 °C, mortality rates surpassed 80% within 10 s, achieving complete mortality within 3 min. The nematodes infesting the roots of S. podophyllum and P. frutescens were successfully controlled and the treatment caused no thermal damage to the plants.
According to Arcinas’s study on Radopholus similis Cobb in an in vitro test, the LT99 value at 47 °C was 5.1 min [32]. R. similis has been listed as a prohibited pest for regulation in Korea, as it is a nematode of major importance that damages various plants worldwide. In our study, the LT99 of P. penetrans at 46, 48, and 50 °C was 27.0, 14.7, and 1.4 min, respectively. Comparing the two studies’ results, P. penetrans appears to exhibit higher heat tolerance compared to R. similis. Therefore, the temperature and exposure duration used for P. penetrans control can also be used for controlling R. similis.
In in vivo tests for Pratylenchus spp. in previous studies, hot water treatment at 49 °C for 10 min was effective for controlling P. coffea in A. hookeri [12], whereas P. penetrans in young apple trees was controlled when exposed to water at 46 to 47 °C for 30 min [33]. In addition, the temperature range to control P. penetrans is mainly between 43 and 48 °C, with exposure for 30 min to 1 h [10]. Considering that LT99 on P. penetrans in P. frutescens at 46 and 48 °C was 18.4 and 18.6 min, respectively, in our study, we can confirm that our results are consistent with previous studies. Susceptibility of P. penetrans to hot water treatment also did not differ significantly between S. podophyllum and P. frutescens (Table 2). Thus, the temperature and time could potentially be applied to different foliage plants, such as Anthurium and Caladium, which are also known to improve human health by cleaning the air.
When the results of the in vitro and in vivo tests were compared, the 95% confidence limits of the LT99 values at 48 °C were 10.48–22.59 and 10.34–55.91 min, respectively, whereas at 50 °C, they were 0.90–3.16 and 1.32–2.19 min (Table 1 and Table 2). There were no significant differences between them, suggesting that nematode infestations of plants did not affect their heat sensitivity.
This can be attributed to the rapid ramping speed of the temperature inside the roots. We investigated the heat conductivity into irregularly shaped S. podophyllum roots based on different root thicknesses. We found that the time taken to reach the target temperature of 50 °C within the roots increased as the root thickness increased, and that ramping took less than 3 min when the root diameter ranged from 2 to 12 mm (Figure 2). The increasing trend equation, y = 13.39x − 26.111 (R2 = 0.8029), calculated in this study can be utilized for predicting the time to reach the target temperature depending on the root diameter.
Hot water treatment did not cause heat damage in A. hookeri at 48 °C when exposed for 5 to 30 min and at 49 °C for 5 to 10 min [7]. In this study, S. podophyllum treated at 49 and 51 °C for 30 min had no statistically significant difference in the weight gain ratio compared to the control (p > 0.05). This indicates that S. podophyllum is more heat tolerant than A. hookeri. We can thus confirm that the impact of hot water treatment may vary depending on the variety and plant species [34].
To develop appropriate phytosanitary treatment measures to control new pests, several tests are necessary, including efficacy data under operational as well as laboratory conditions [8]. Future research should be carried out to evaluate the efficacy and damage that the nematodes cause to the plants at a commercial scale. Moreover, more nematode species should be considered for different plants with larger root diameters to further develop this treatment as a quarantine process. Nevertheless, this study identified the temperature and time that can effectively control a newly identified pest, P. penetrans, in two newly imported plants, S. podophyllum and P. frutescens. The applicability of the results from this study, including the ramping speed of the root temperature and the lack of damage from hot water treatment, was also confirmed. The research will help set a standard for phytosanitary treatment using hot water treatment and will further accelerate the trade of foliage plants including S. podophyllum by reducing economic losses from disposal or return of infected plants to the county of origin.

Author Contributions

Project administration, supervision, funding acquisition, review and editing, M.-G.P.; investigation, methodology and formal analysis, M.-S.H.; formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation, validation and data curation, G.-E.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received support from the Rural Development Administration (RDA; project No.: RS-2023-00218773).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Byung-Yong Park, and Se-Keun Park from the Crop Protection Division of RDA for providing nematodes and plants. We also thank Mee Jang from the Pest Control Division of the APQA for providing information on the interception of nematodes in Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. APQA. Pest Information System. Available online: http://10.110.128.100 (accessed on 25 July 2023).
  2. Wolverton, B.C.; McDonald, R.C.; Watkins, E. Foliage plants for removing indoor air pollutants from energy-efficient homes. Econ. Bot. 1984, 38, 224–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nguyen, T.D.; Nguyen, H.T.; Le, T.M.L.; Trinh, Q.P. First report of Pratylenchus penetrans (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae) associated with artichokes in Vietnam. J. Nematol. 2023, 55, 20230060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kim, J.-I.; Minagawa, N. Classification of root-lesion nematodes occurring in vinyl-houses planted horticultural crops. RDA J. Agric. Sci. Crop Prot. 1996, 38, 530–538. [Google Scholar]
  5. EPPO. EPPO Global Database. Available online: https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/PRATPE/categorization (accessed on 2 February 2024).
  6. Seo, S. The Summer Fallow Season Is the Right Time to Control Root Lesion Nematodes in Perilla Plantations. Available online: https://www.agrinet.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=301761 (accessed on 28 March 2024). (In Korean).
  7. RDA. Dignosis and Management of Major Plant-Parasitic Nematodes; National Institute of Agricultural Sciences: Jeonju, Republic of Korea, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  8. IPPC. Phytosanitary Treatments for Regulated Pests; ISPM 28; FAO/IPPC: Rome, Italy, 2007; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gebremichael, G.N.; Gebrehiwot, A. A Review on Biology and Management of Radopholus similis. Adv. Life Sci. Technol. 2015, 36, 91–95. [Google Scholar]
  10. Castillo, P.N.V. Pratylenchus (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae): Diagnosis, Biology, Pathogenicity and Management; Hunt, D.J., Ed.; Koninklijke Brill NV: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  11. Koen, H. Thermotherapeutic control of Pratylenchus brachyurus in potato tubers. Phytophylactica 1969, 1, 67–70. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cho, D.H.; Park, B.R.; Chun, J.Y.; Noh, Y.H.; Kim, Y.H.; Park, M.G.; Kim, D.; Lee, K.Y. Hot water immersion of Allium hookeri roots for the control of the plant parasitic nematodes Meloidogyne javanica and Pratylenchus coffeae. Entomol. Res. 2017, 47, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cho, D.; Park, K.; Kim, Y.; Koh, K.-B.; Park, Y. Study on hot water immersion treatment for control of Meloidogyne spp. and Pratylenchus spp. in a ginger, Zingiber officinale. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 2017, 56, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lear, B. Hot-water treatment of grapevine rootings for eradication of a root-lesion nematode, Pratylenchus vulnus. Plant Dis. Rep. 1966, 50, 858–859. [Google Scholar]
  15. APQA. Phytosanitary Disinfestation Guidelines. Available online: http://www.qia.go.kr/plant/disinpect/listXdclbzWebAction.do (accessed on 28 March 2024).
  16. Baermann, G. Eine einfache methode zur auffindung von Ancylostomum (Nematoden) larven in erdproben. Geneeskd. Tijdschr. Ned. Indie 1917, 57, 131–137. [Google Scholar]
  17. Finney, D.J. Probit Analysis, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  18. Don-Pedro, K. Mode of action of fixed oils against eggs of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Pestic. Sci. 1989, 26, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ma, K.; Cho, Y.; Jeong, B.; Choi, D. Control effect on root-knot nematodes by hot water dipping treatment in kiwifruit. Korean J. Org. Agric. 2011, 19, 255–258. [Google Scholar]
  20. Elsen, A.; Goossens, B.; Belpaire, B.; Neyens, A.; Speijer, P.; De Waele, D. Recolonisation by nematodes of hot water treated cooking banana planting material in Uganda. Nematology 2004, 6, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hauser, S. Effects of fertilizer and hot-water treatment upon establishment, survival and yield of plantain (Musa spp., AAB, French). Field Crops Res. 2000, 66, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tsang, M.; Hara, A.; Sipes, B. Hot-water treatments of potted palms to control the burrowing nematode, Radopholus similis. Crop Prot. 2003, 22, 589–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tsang, M.M.; Kara, A.; Sipes, B. Efficacy of hot water drenches of Anthurium andraeanum plants against the burrowing nematode Radopholus similis and plant thermotolerance. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2004, 145, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lear, B.; Lider, L. Eradication of root-knot nematodes from grapevine rootings by hot water. Plant Dis. Rep. 1959, 14, 314–317. [Google Scholar]
  25. McSorley, R.; McMillan, R., Jr.; Parrado, J. Meloidogyne incognita on society garlic and its control. Plant Dis. 1984, 68, 166–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Suatmadji, R.W. Control of root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne javanica, in rooted stocks of grapevine, Vitis vinifera, by immersion in nematicide solutions at different temperatures and in hot water. Nematol. Mediterr. 1982, 10, 119–125. [Google Scholar]
  27. Brcka, C.; McSorley, R.; Frederick, J.J. Effect of hot water treatments on root-knot nematodes and caladium tubers. In Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, Florida, FL, USA, 23–25 July 2000; pp. 158–161. [Google Scholar]
  28. Coyne, D.; Wasukira, A.; Dusabe, J.; Rotifa, I.; Dubois, T. Boiling water treatment: A simple, rapid and effective technique for nematode and banana weevil management in banana and plantain (Musa spp.) planting material. Crop Prot. 2010, 29, 1478–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chitwood, B.; Haasis, F.; Blanton, F. Hot-water–formalin treatment (at 110–111° F) of field grown and of forced narcissus bulbs infected with the bulb or stem nematode. Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 1941, 8, 44–50. [Google Scholar]
  30. Nega, E.; Ulrich, R.; Werner, S.; Jahn, M. Hot water treatment of vegetable seed—An alternative seed treatment method to control seed-borne pathogens in organic farming/ Heißwasserbehandlung von Gemüsesaatgut—Eine alternative Saatgutbehandlungsmethode zur Bekämpfung samenbürtiger Pathogene im ökologischen Landbau. Z. Pflanzenkrankh. Pflanzenschutz J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2003, 110, 220–234. [Google Scholar]
  31. Cuc, N.T.T.; Son, N.T.; Trung, T.M.; văn Trang, N.; Đang, L.M.; Pilon, M. Hot water treatment prevents Aphelenchoides besseyi damage to Polianthes tuberosa crops in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. Crop Prot. 2010, 29, 599–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Arcinas, A.C. Hot Water Drench Treatments for the Control of Burrowing Nematode, Radopholus Similis. In Tropical Ornamentals; University of Hawaii at Manoa: Honolulu, HI, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  33. Way, J. Phytothermotherapy for nematode control. In Proceedings of the Nematological Society of Southern Africa Newsletter, Nelspruit, South Africa, 9–10 April 1973. [Google Scholar]
  34. Viaene, N.; Coyne, D.L.; Kerry, B.R. Biological and Cultural Control; Perry, R.N., Ed.; Plant Nematology, CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
Agriculture 14 00582 g001
Figure 1. Mortality trends of Pratylenchus penetrans Cobb relative to the duration of exposure at each target temperature in a hot water in vitro test.
Figure 1. Mortality trends of Pratylenchus penetrans Cobb relative to the duration of exposure at each target temperature in a hot water in vitro test.
Agriculture 14 00582 g001
Agriculture 14 00582 g002
Figure 2. Variation in the time taken for Syngonium podophyllum Schottt roots to reach the target temperature, depending on the root diameter (a) and filling ratio (b).
Figure 2. Variation in the time taken for Syngonium podophyllum Schottt roots to reach the target temperature, depending on the root diameter (a) and filling ratio (b).
Agriculture 14 00582 g002
Agriculture 14 00582 g003
Figure 3. Trend of increasing Pratylenchus penetrans Cobb mortality in infected Perilla frutescens Britton and Syngonium podophyllum Schott roots following hot water treatment at different temperatures.
Figure 3. Trend of increasing Pratylenchus penetrans Cobb mortality in infected Perilla frutescens Britton and Syngonium podophyllum Schott roots following hot water treatment at different temperatures.
Agriculture 14 00582 g003
Agriculture 14 00582 g004
Figure 4. Effect of hot water treatment on Syngonium podophyllum Schott. C: 0 min immersion; 1, 2, and 3 were exposed to 49 °C for 30 min in the water bath, after which the whole plant was cultured for 30 days.
Figure 4. Effect of hot water treatment on Syngonium podophyllum Schott. C: 0 min immersion; 1, 2, and 3 were exposed to 49 °C for 30 min in the water bath, after which the whole plant was cultured for 30 days.
Agriculture 14 00582 g004
Agriculture 14 00582 g005
Figure 5. Increasing trends of Syngonium podophyllum Schott mass 30 days after hot water treatment when immersed for 0, 1, 5, 10, 15, and 30 min at 49 °C (a) and at 51 °C (b). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and NS: not significant.
Figure 5. Increasing trends of Syngonium podophyllum Schott mass 30 days after hot water treatment when immersed for 0, 1, 5, 10, 15, and 30 min at 49 °C (a) and at 51 °C (b). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and NS: not significant.
Agriculture 14 00582 g005
Table 1. Efficacy of hot water treatment at different temperatures on Pratylenchus penetrans Cobb mortality in a small-scale in vitro test (50 L).
Table 1. Efficacy of hot water treatment at different temperatures on Pratylenchus penetrans Cobb mortality in a small-scale in vitro test (50 L).
Temp. (°C)No. of
P. penetrans		LT50% a
(95% CI, min)		LT99% a
(95% CI, min)		Slope ± SE bdf cX2 d
4410083.31 (2.41–4.48)119.13 (69.22–245.43)1.49 ± 0.1219166.07
4613992.68 (2.09–3.36)27.03 (17.20–54.80)2.32 ± 0.271976.51
4816491.08 (0.91–1.29)14.70 (10.48–22.59)2.05 ± 0.1325239.72
507990.03 (0.01–0.06)1.40 (0.90–3.16)1.43 ± 0.241334.66
523860.04 (0.01–0.08)0.48 (0.31–5.48)2.09 ± 0.79136.95
a LT50% and LT99% values with 95% CIs indicate the time at which 50% and 99% lethality of the nematodes is achieved, with a 95% confidence interval, respectively. b Slope indicates the relationship between the time at a specific temperature and the lethality of P. penetrans. SE: standard error. c Degree of freedom. d X2 based on pooling of data with low expectation.
Table 2. Efficacy of hot water treatment at different temperatures on Pratylenchus penetrans Cobb mortality in the roots of Perilla frutescens Britton and Syngonium podophyllum Schott.
Table 2. Efficacy of hot water treatment at different temperatures on Pratylenchus penetrans Cobb mortality in the roots of Perilla frutescens Britton and Syngonium podophyllum Schott.
PlantTemp.
(°C)		LT50% a
(95% CI, min)		LT99% a
(95% CI, min)		Slope ± SE bdf cX2 d
P. frustescens460.77 (0.50–1.05)18.42 (11.82–36.50)1.69 ± 0.181384.92
480.90 (0.49–1.30)18.59 (10.34–55.91)1.77 ± 0.271342.56
500.03 (0.01–0.08)1.68 (1.32–2.19)1.32 ± 0.241031.00
S. podophyllum500.01 (0.01–0.04)2.67(1.69–4.95)0.91 ± 0.211318.04
52<1.00<1.00---
a LT50% and LT99% values with 95% CIs indicate the time at which 50% and 99% lethality of the nematodes is achieved, with a 95% confidence interval, respectively. b Slope indicates the relationship between the time at a certain temperature and the lethality of P. penetrans. SE: standard error. c Degree of freedom. d X2 based on pooling of data with low expectation.
Table 3. The increasing rate (%) of Syngonium podophyllum Schott mass with growing time following exposure to hot water at 49 °C and 51 °C.
Table 3. The increasing rate (%) of Syngonium podophyllum Schott mass with growing time following exposure to hot water at 49 °C and 51 °C.
Temp. (°C)Treatment TimeFp
0 min1 min5 min10 min15 min30 min
49 °C38.6 ± 6.918.7 ± 6.435.3 ± 4.031.0 ± 6.641.7 ± 4.125.7 ± 7.32.8960.053
51 °C9.6 ± 8.33.3 ± 2.324.2 ± 5.7620.1 ± 7.233.0 ± 15.217.5 ± 12.61.1800.367
Values are represented as mean ± SE (n = 3), except for 0 min (n = 5). They indicate an increasing rate (%) of S. podophyllum mass over a 30-day cultivation period after the plant was treated with hot water for varying amounts of time.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lim, G.-E.; Heo, M.-S.; Park, M.-G. Hot Water Treatment as a Quarantine Measure for Controlling Pratylenchus penetrans Cobb in Syngonium podophyllum Schott and Perilla frutescens Britton. Agriculture 2024, 14, 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040582

AMA Style

Lim G-E, Heo M-S, Park M-G. Hot Water Treatment as a Quarantine Measure for Controlling Pratylenchus penetrans Cobb in Syngonium podophyllum Schott and Perilla frutescens Britton. Agriculture. 2024; 14(4):582. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040582

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lim, Ga-Eul, Moon-Sun Heo, and Min-Goo Park. 2024. "Hot Water Treatment as a Quarantine Measure for Controlling Pratylenchus penetrans Cobb in Syngonium podophyllum Schott and Perilla frutescens Britton" Agriculture 14, no. 4: 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040582

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop