Analysis of Vibration Characteristics of Tractor–Rotary Cultivator Combination Based on Time Domain and Frequency Domain
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Tractor and Rotary Tiller Structure
2.2. Analysis of the Main Vibration Sources of the Unit
2.3. Laboratory Equipment
2.4. Experimental Program
2.5. Signal Acquisition and Analysis
2.5.1. Time Domain Analysis
2.5.2. Frequency Domain Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Time Domain Analysis of Rotary Tillage Unit
- (1)
- The vertical amplitude of the rotary tiller and tractor cab in the working state was higher than in the no-load state, and the amplitude increased with the speed, indicating that the unit had other excitation sources besides the rotary tiller. However, this change would be obvious at a higher speed. When the vehicle speed was 2.1 km/h, the amplitude increased by only 0.667 m/s2 and 0.017 m/s2, respectively, compared with zero speed, while the amplitude increase was 5.534 m/s2 and 0.145 m/s2, respectively, at the speed of 4.5 km/h. During the tractor rotary tillage operations, the average vertical acceleration generated by the rotary tiller at different vehicle speeds was 24.294 m/s2, and the average vertical acceleration generated by the three-point suspension mechanism was 19.042 m/s2, which was much larger than the vertical acceleration everywhere of the tractor. This showed that the rotary tiller was the most important excitation source in the unit. In addition, an analysis of the vibration conditions at different positions of the tractor showed that the vertical vibration of the front wheel (6.370 m/s2) was greater than the tractor’s rear wheel (4.077 m/s2) and the cab (1.299 m/s2). In addition to the different distances from the rotary tiller, the reason might also be related to the front and rear wheel load, stubble thickness, front and rear wheel vibration amplitude, and other factors.
- (2)
- Investigating the changes in the vertical vibration acceleration of the different parts, it could be seen that the influence of working speed on each measurement part from large to small was as follows: three-point suspension mechanism > rotary tiller > tractor rear wheels > tractor front wheels > cab. Among them, the standard deviation of the three-point suspension mechanism (5.914 m/s2) was much larger than that of other parts, indicating that speed changes had the greatest impact on the three-point suspension mechanism. The reason may be that the three-point suspension mechanism, the tractor, and the rotary tiller used pins and other movable connections, so it was greatly affected by inertia. The vertical vibration change in the rotary tiller (2.499 m/s2) was second only to the three-point suspension mechanism, indicating that the vehicle speed was an important factor in the vibration changes in the rotary tiller operation, which, in turn, affected the quality of the rotary tillage operation. While the cab’s vertical vibration acceleration changed the least (0.070 m/s2), presumably because the tractor’s vibration damping device had good vibration damping performance near the cab.
- (3)
- The vertical vibration amplitude and vibration acceleration standard deviation of the rotary tiller and the three-point suspension mechanism were much larger than those of the tractor components, indicating that the biggest excitation source for the two came from their interaction, which meant their interaction led to a severe vibration. The vertical acceleration amplitude of the rear wheels of the tractor (4.077 m/s2) was generally smaller than that of the front wheels (6.370 m/s2), which was related to the fact that the mass of the rear wheel was greater than that of the front wheel. However, the acceleration changes in the rear wheels (1.726 m/s2) were greater than those in the front wheel (1.425 m/s2). It was speculated that the rear wheels were affected by the violent vibration of the three-point suspension device, which accelerated the change in its own vibration amplitude.
- (4)
- From working condition 1 to working condition 3, the overall vertical vibration acceleration of the rotary tiller and tractor increased, but the growth rate slowed down. The vibration acceleration of each part of the tractor increased as the vehicle sped up as a whole but the vibration acceleration of the tractor’s front wheel decreased by 1.616 m/s2 from 2.1 km/h to 3.6 km/h, and then increased again when it reached 4.5 km/h. It was speculated that when the vehicle speed was 3.6 km/h, the load distribution of the tractor changed, and the load on the left front wheel became smaller.
- (5)
- The durability of agricultural machinery could be detected using vibration signals [33]. The vibration of the symmetrical structure of the wheeled tractor should be similar, but the vibration acceleration on the left side of each measured part in Table 5 was greater than that of the right side. This might have been caused by problems with the tractor parts and structural assembly, which, in turn, led to abnormal vibration transmission paths of the front and rear wheels and the three-point suspension mechanism symmetry point [34]. The vibration acceleration of the tractor’s front left wheel only decreased by 3.781 m/s2 when the speed was 3.6 km/h, resulting in a decrease in the vibration acceleration of the tractor’s front wheel, as in Table 7. At this time, the tractor’s vibration damping mechanism could not achieve a more balanced vibration suppression effect on the left and right sides, and further inspection of the quality of the tractor’s assembly and parts was required.
- (6)
- During the experiment, the three-point suspension mechanism produced the maximum amplitude, influencing the rotary tiller and tractor connected to its axle pin to produce greater vibration, which, in turn, affected the operation of the unit. For the tractor, the vibration was transmitted from the rear axle to the cab, causing a higher vibration of the seat, resulting in reduced comfort of the tractor seat, which was not conducive to the driver’s long-term operation of the tractor. At the same time, appropriately increasing the amplitude of the rotary tiller could reduce the cutting resistance of the rotary tiller blade into the soil, which is conducive to improving the quality of rotary tillage operation [35], but excessive vibration may also aggravate blade fatigue damage. For this reason, the resonance frequency of the rotary tiller should be avoided as much as possible.
- (7)
- Judging from the results of time domain analysis alone, higher speed means larger amplitude for each component, but this inference still needs further verification.
3.2. Frequency Domain Analysis of Rotary Tillage Unit
- (1)
- At the three working speeds, the amplitude of the tractor cab appeared as small peaks in the frequency range of 0~8 Hz, and with the increase in working speed, the peak frequency of the amplitude reduced from 6.8 Hz to 4.9 Hz. As the human body is more sensitive to vertical vibration frequencies in the range of 4–8 Hz, it would not be appropriate to work for a long time in that environment. The change in the peak frequency of the seat vibration in the low frequency range (1~16 Hz) was consistent with the content in the literature [36]. Therefore, maintaining high-speed operation of the unit in actual operation may avoid the sensitive frequency interval of the human body and maintain human health.
- (2)
- For the tractor, the peaks of vibration energy first occurred intensively in the low-frequency range of 0~100 Hz. Under the three working speeds, the power spectrum density in the X, Y, and Z directions all produced the first peak near 33 Hz. Regardless of the speed and direction, in the frequency range of 30~50 Hz, the energy occupied by the tractor’s vibration signal began to gather significantly, especially at the highest speed, indicating that the first-order natural frequency of the tractor may exist in the continuous range of 30~50 Hz. In the wide range of 100~500 Hz, the power spectrum density values of the tractor in each direction varied, and the overall vibration energy density was higher. Combined with the corresponding frequency of the power spectrum peak of the rotary tiller in Table 8, it could be seen that the tractor had a resonance band of a certain width in this range. Unlike the tractor, the vibration signal power distribution of the rotary tiller in the range of 0~100 Hz was not significant, and the vibration energy in all directions was less than in the range above 250 Hz. Considering that its design purpose was to loosen the topsoil, it is beneficial for the rotary tiller to have much greater vibration energy than the tractor cab when working.
- (3)
- For the movement of the rotary tiller in the X direction, the peak power spectrum of working condition 1 (15.728 (m/s2)2) was much larger than that of working conditions 2 and 3. Figure 7a is the time–frequency diagram of the X-direction vibration of the rotary tiller gearbox under working condition 1. After processing with the band stop filter, it could be seen that there was a relatively obvious vibration energy distribution at various frequencies, among which the energy distribution at a frequency of about 350 Hz was the most significant, and the energy concentration did not change over time. More concentrated energy distributions could also be seen when the frequencies were near 700 Hz, 1050 Hz, and 1400 Hz (that was, integer multiples of 350 Hz). In the short period, the other frequency components except 350 Hz were not significant, indicating that the energy of the rotary tiller under working condition 1 was the most concentrated at the frequency of 350 Hz. This was consistent with the frequency corresponding to the gearbox vibration peak in Table 8 (351 Hz). It was inferred that the center of mass of the rotary cultivator resonated near the frequency of 350 Hz.
- (4)
- Figure 7b is a time–frequency diagram of the vibration of the tractor cab in the X direction under working condition 1. The figure showed that the frequency corresponded to the maximum vibration at about 280 Hz, and the energy there remained unchanged during the sampling time. In Table 8, the tractor centroid power spectrum peak at a frequency of 274 Hz under working condition 3 increased significantly (0.794 (m/s2)2), and the peak frequencies under the three working conditions were all in the 270–280 Hz range. Therefore, it can be speculated that there was a resonance frequency in this interval.
- (5)
- The X-direction resonance frequency of the rotary tiller was around 350 Hz, which was higher than the X-direction resonance frequency of the tractor cab (280 Hz). For tractors, people would want to avoid resonance, but this is different for rotary tillers. For the entire unit, improving operating efficiency is to better perform the rotary tillage operations. Since increasing the vibration of the rotary tiller can reduce the adhesion of soil to the rotary tiller blades [37], the operating speed can be increased to increase the amplitude of the rotary tiller operation, thereby reducing the resistance of the soil to the rotary tiller operation and improving operating efficiency and quality.
- (6)
- For the movement of the gearbox in the Y direction, the PSD diagram showed that its vibration energy was concentrated in the high-frequency range of 750~1000 Hz, which was much higher than the resonance frequencies in the X and Z directions. Therefore, when considering avoiding resonance of the rotary cultivator, only the vibration in the X and Z directions need to be considered. The tractor cab in the Y direction generated a large vibration acceleration near 78 Hz. The vibration energy was concentrated in the lower frequency range of 75~135 Hz under various working conditions, but the overall vibration acceleration of the Y-axis was low, causing little impact.
- (7)
- The Z-direction rotary tiller gearbox had a wide frequency range of violent vibrations, and large vibrations occurred between 430 and 1200 Hz under three working conditions. It was speculated that this was related to the fact that the rotary tiller would jump up and down in the vertical direction due to the rotary tiller blade encountering resistance when entering the soil and the vibration acceleration of the blade axis changing more obviously in the Z direction. The maximum vibration acceleration frequencies generated by the tractor in the Z direction were 66 Hz, 78 Hz, and 272 Hz, respectively, which were more concentrated than those in the X and Y directions.
- (8)
- The results of the frequency domain analysis showed that high speed did not always lead to high amplitude. Sometimes, the PSD values of the rotary tiller in each direction at low speed were higher than those at high speed. In the low-frequency range relevant to human health, the low-speed amplitude was also greater than the high-speed amplitude.
- (9)
- When using the signal analyzer in Matlab 2022a for the time–frequency analysis shown in Figure 7, a band-stop filter was also used to preprocess the original signal data, and the frequency components of the resulting time–frequency diagram were still relatively complex. In order to obtain a time–frequency diagram with clearer vibration energy distribution and better time–frequency aggregation, the next step could be to use continuous wavelet transform and other analysis methods with good time–frequency resolution to extract the characteristics of the vibration signal.
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- The vibration amplitude of the rotary tiller needs to be appropriately increased to reduce the resistance to soil penetration, but the interaction between the tractor and the rotary tiller causes the vibration to be transmitted to the tractor synchronously, which is harmful to the tractor. Therefore, while the tractor is mounted with a rotary tiller and operates at high speed and efficiency, the vibration reduction capacity of the tractor also needs to be optimized to achieve higher quality of work and more stable operation.
- (2)
- Generally speaking, the vibration acceleration at each measurement point increased with the increase in working speed, but this was not necessarily the case in certain frequency domain intervals. In some frequency domain intervals, the amplitude did not always increase with increasing speed. It might be that the low-frequency range is less affected at low speed, while the amplitude change in the high-frequency range at higher speeds still needs to be tested.
- (3)
- The reason for why the vibration amplitude of the unit increased with the tractor speed might be related to the more violent collision between the unit and the stubble surface caused by the increase in speed. However, in the low-frequency and low-amplitude range, which has an important impact on human health, the vertical resonance frequency of the cab seat decreased with the increase in amplitude (from 6.8 Hz to 4.9 Hz). In the future, the change law of the vertical amplitude of the seat under high-speed operation of the unit can be studied to help the driver operate the tractor more healthily.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Qin, J.W. Current status and suggestions for the use of tillage machinery standards. Agric. Mach. Qual. Superv. 2020, 01, 20–21. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, W.X. Discussion on the technical characteristics of rotary tiller and land preparation technology. Guangxi Agric. Mech. 2022, 05, 22–25. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.; Zhou, J.; Wang, X. Research on Energy Management Model for Extended-range Electric Rotary-tilling Tractor. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2023, 54, 428–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.R.; Zhou, Y.P.; Tang, Z.; Lu, S.N. Modal vibration response of rice combine harvester frame under multi-source excitation. Biosyst. Eng. 2020, 194, 177–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhai, C.; Long, J.; Taylor, R.; Weckler, P.; Wang, N. Field scale row unit vibration affecting planting quality. Precis. Agric. 2020, 21, 589–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.Y.; Yan, X.X.; Tang, H. Method of controlling tillage depth for agricultural tractors considering engine load characteristics. Biosyst. Eng. 2023, 227, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.; Liu, M.; Wang, Z.; Wang, C.; Luo, F. Research on Load Spectrum Reconstruction Method of Exhaust System Mounting Bracket of a Hybrid Tractor Based on MOPSO-Wavelet Decomposition Technique. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watanabe, M.; Sakai, K. Delayed feedback control for chaotic vibration in nonlinear impact dynamics of bouncing agricultural tractor. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 10695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.; Nawayseh, N.; Samuel, S.; Dhabi, Y.K.; Singh, H. Real-time vibration monitoring and analysis of agricultural tractor drivers using an IoT-based system. J. Field Robot. 2023, 40, 1723–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Ke, S.; Wang, G.; Liu, Z. Control Strategy Simulation Analysis of a New Micro-cultivator MR Elastomer Vibration Isolation System. Adv. Eng. Sci. 2020, 52, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, Y.T.; Qi, T.X.; Liao, Q.X.; Zeng, R.; Li, C.L.; Gao, L.P. Vibration characteristics of pneumatic combined precision rapeseed seeder and its effect on seeding performance. J. Jilin Univ. (Eng. Technol. Ed.) 2022, 52, 1184–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, Q.H.; Yu, Q.X.; Dong, J.Y. Dynamic analysis of rotary tiller gearbox based on EDEM, ADAMS and ANSYS. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2019, 36, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, L.; Jian, C.; Xie, H.J.; Wang, S.M. Vibration test and analysis of mini-tiller. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2016, 9, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, X.W.; Yang, X.L.; Pang, J.; Ji, J.T.; Jin, X.; Chen, L. Design and Test of Tillage Depth Monitoring System for Suspended Rotary Tiller. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2019, 50, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y. Random Vibration Characteristics Analysis and Experimental Research of Self-Propelled Micro Tillage Machine. Ph.D. Thesis, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, G.; Hu, L.; Luo, X.; Wang, P.; He, J.; Huang, P.; Zhao, R.; Feng, D.; Tu, T. A review of global precision land-leveling technologies and implements: Current status, challenges and future trends. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2024, 220, 108901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, X.D.; Yang, Z.H.; Song, Z.H.; Liu, J.H.; Yuan, W. Analysis of influence of tractor rotary tillage load on power take-off driveline. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2022, 53, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Zheng, E.L.; Zhou, Y.Q.; Yao, H.P.; Zhu, Y. Vibration characteristics analysis of wheeled tractor/implement system under plough operation condition. J. Nanjing Agric. Univ. 2021, 44, 1002–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, S.H.; Xu, G.; Yuan, J.Q.; Ma, J.F.; Yi, L.; Li, K. Influence of implement’s mass on vibration characteristics of tractor-implement system. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2014, 30, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, H.B.; Li, Z.Y. Discussion on the working status and efficiency of tractor rotary tillage unit. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 1989, 03, 96–99. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, B.J.; Geng, Y.F. Research & development on dongfanghong 1gqn series rotary tiller. Shandong Agric. Mach. 2002, 8, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.X.; Liao, Q.X.; Zhang, Q.S.; Zhang, Q.S.; Kang, Y.; Zhang, J.Q. Vibration characteristics analysis and structural improvement of the shovel type seedbed preparation machine suitable for rapeseed mechanical direct seeding. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2023, 39, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, J.B.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.L.; Jiang, Y.B.; Guan, L. Application analysis of matching tractor PTO shaft and agricultural ma-chinery. China South. Agric. Mach. 2023, 54, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.X.; Shuai, S.J. Automotive Engine Fundamentals, 2nd ed.; Tsinghua University Press: Beijing, China, 2011; 128p. [Google Scholar]
- Pang, J.; Li, Y.M.; Ji, J.T.; Xu, L.Z. Vibration excitation identification and control of the cutter of a combine harvester using triaxial accelerometers and partial coherence sorting. Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 185, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Z.P.; Xu, L.Z.; Li, Y.M.; Wang, Y.D.; Sun, P.P. Vibration measure and analysis of crawler-type rice and wheat combine harvester in field harvesting condition. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2017, 33, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, P.; Lu, T.; Shen, C.; Chen, S. Influence of vibration on the grain flow sensor during the harvest and the difference elimination method. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2021, 14, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, Y.C.; Song, Z.H.; Du, Y.F.; Zhao, Y.X.; Mao, E.R.; Liu, F. Analysis of vibration characteristics and its major influenced factors of header for corn combine harvesting machine. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2017, 33, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, J. Study on Vibration Characteristics of Tractor Based on Excitation of Agricultural Terrain Roughness. Ph.D. Dissertation, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, X. Application of fast fourier transform in signal processing. Inf. Rec. Mater. 2021, 22, 184–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.Q.; Wang, C.; Cui, Y. Comparative analysis study of conventional time-frequency analysis methods. Chang. Inf. Commun. 2020, 08, 55–56. [Google Scholar]
- Geng, L.X.; Li, K.; Pang, J.; Jin, X.; Ji, J.T. Test and analysis of vibration characteristics of transplanting machine based on time frequency and power spectral density. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2021, 37, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Z.; Zhang, Z.L.; Zhang, Z.H.; Song, Z.Q.; Liu, Y.B.; Li, Y.M.; Xu, L.Z. Durable Testing and Analysis of a Cleaning Sieve Based on Vibration and Strain Signals. Agriculture 2023, 13, 2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.J.; Jin, J.F.; Chen, Y.Y.; Chen, Y.K. Vibration symmetry characteristics of wheeled tractor structure. J. Jilin Univ. (Eng. Technol. Ed.) 2023, 53, 2136–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.M.; Wang, T.Y.; Guo, B.; Chen, X.; Zhou, F.J. Design and test of key components of rotary cultivator based on vibration drag reduction principle. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2019, 50, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.; Griffin, M.J. Response of the seated human body to whole-body vertical vibration: Biodynamic responses to sinusoidal and random vibration. Ergonomics 2014, 57, 693–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, G.; Xia, J.; Zheng, K.; Cheng, J.; Wang, K.; Zeng, R.; Wang, H.; Liu, Z. Effects of vibration parameters on the interfacial adhesion system between soil and metal surface. Soil Till. Res. 2022, 218, 105294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Rotating Speed/rpm | PTO/rpm | Overall Size/mm |
---|---|---|
2100 | 540/750/1000 | 4540 × 2000 × 2650 |
Matching Horsepower/Hp | Cultivated Width/cm | Cultivation Depth/cm | PTO/rpm |
---|---|---|---|
90~105 | 250 | 2~16 | 720/540 |
Vibration Source | Theoretical Vibration Frequency/Hz |
---|---|
PTO | 8~10 |
Tractor engine | 54~58 |
Rotary tiller shaft | 4~5 |
Sensor Number | Sensitivity in All Directions/mV·g−1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
X | Y | Z | |
1 | 50.24 | 50.39 | 50.53 |
2 | 49.64 | 50.27 | 50.16 |
3 | 49.10 | 49.88 | 49.60 |
4 | 49.35 | 50.41 | 51.05 |
5 | 49.21 | 50.33 | 49.62 |
6 | 49.86 | 50.05 | 49.28 |
7 | 48.82 | 50.14 | 50.26 |
8 | 49.40 | 48.66 | 49.01 |
The Location of the Measurement Point | RMS/m·s−2 |
---|---|
Rotary tiller | 20.865 |
Cab | 1.201 |
Speed/ km·h−1 | RMS of Vertical Vibration Acceleration at Different Positions of the Unit/m·s−2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rotary Tiller | Three-Point Suspension Mechanism | Tractor Rear Wheels | Cab | Tractor Front Wheels | |
2.1 | 21.532 | 12.507 | 2.104 | 1.218 | 6.500 |
3.6 | 24.950 | 20.594 | 4.820 | 1.333 | 4.884 |
4.5 | 26.399 | 24.026 | 5.306 | 1.346 | 7.726 |
Average value | 24.294 | 19.042 | 4.077 | 1.299 | 6.370 |
Standard deviation | 2.499 | 5.914 | 1.726 | 0.070 | 1.425 |
Speed/ km·h−1 | RMS of Vertical Acceleration on Both Sides of the Rotary Tillage Unit/m·s−2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Linkage Left Lower Tie Rod | Linkage Right Lower Tie Rod | Tractor Left Rear Wheel | Tractor Right Rear Wheel | Tractor Left Front Wheel | Tractor Right Front Wheel | |
2.1 | 20.382 | 4.632 | 4.129 | 0.078 | 10.973 | 2.018 |
3.6 | 24.463 | 16.725 | 9.566 | 0.074 | 7.192 | 2.575 |
4.5 | 27.509 | 20.543 | 10.529 | 0.082 | 12.848 | 2.603 |
Average value | 24.118 | 13.967 | 8.075 | 0.078 | 10.338 | 2.399 |
Standard deviation | 3.576 | 8.306 | 3.451 | 0.004 | 2.881 | 0.330 |
Measuring Point Location | Rotary Tiller Gearbox | Tractor Cab | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Speed/km·h−1 | 2.1 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 2.1 | 3.6 | 4.5 |
Peak axial | X | Y | Y | X | X | X |
Peak/(m·s−2)2 | 15.728 | 7.213 | 7.958 | 0.216 | 0.115 | 0.794 |
Frequency/Hz | 351 | 466 | 548 | 270 | 275 | 274 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Fu, S.; Feng, K.; Han, X.; Hu, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Wei, X. Analysis of Vibration Characteristics of Tractor–Rotary Cultivator Combination Based on Time Domain and Frequency Domain. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071139
Gao Y, Yang Y, Fu S, Feng K, Han X, Hu Y, Zhu Q, Wei X. Analysis of Vibration Characteristics of Tractor–Rotary Cultivator Combination Based on Time Domain and Frequency Domain. Agriculture. 2024; 14(7):1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071139
Chicago/Turabian StyleGao, Yuanyuan, Yifei Yang, Shuai Fu, Kangyao Feng, Xing Han, Yongyue Hu, Qingzhen Zhu, and Xinhua Wei. 2024. "Analysis of Vibration Characteristics of Tractor–Rotary Cultivator Combination Based on Time Domain and Frequency Domain" Agriculture 14, no. 7: 1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071139
APA StyleGao, Y., Yang, Y., Fu, S., Feng, K., Han, X., Hu, Y., Zhu, Q., & Wei, X. (2024). Analysis of Vibration Characteristics of Tractor–Rotary Cultivator Combination Based on Time Domain and Frequency Domain. Agriculture, 14(7), 1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071139