Next Article in Journal
Combining Vegetation Indices to Identify the Maize Phenological Information Based on the Shape Model
Previous Article in Journal
Photosynthetic Performance and Heterogeneous Anatomical Structure in Prunus humilis under Saline–Alkaline Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Oxalic Acid Boosts Phosphorus Release from Sewage Sludge Biochar: A Key Mechanism for Biochar-Based Fertilizers

by
Marcela Granato Barbosa dos Santos
1,
Camila Rodrigues Costa
1,
Gilberto de Oliveira Mendes
2,
Andressa Blasi Paiva
1,
Ludmila Soares Peixoto
1,
Jéssica da Luz Costa
1,
Giuliano Marchi
3,
Éder de Souza Martins
3 and
Cícero Célio de Figueiredo
1,*
1
Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília 70910-970, Brazil
2
Instituto de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Rodovia LMG-746, Km 1, Bloco 1A-MC, Monte Carmelo 38500-000, Brazil
3
Embrapa Cerrados, CPAC, Brasília 70275-970, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2024, 14(9), 1607; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14091607
Submission received: 9 August 2024 / Revised: 2 September 2024 / Accepted: 12 September 2024 / Published: 14 September 2024

Abstract

:
Sewage sludge biochar (SSB) exhibits higher phosphorus (P) concentrations than the original sewage sludge (SS) and can be used as a P fertilizer. However, SSB-associated P is strongly retained in chemical compounds, which hinders its release and subsequent plant uptake. The use of organic acids facilitates P solubilization from SSB. Herein, we evaluated the effect of oxalic acid on P release from SSB applied to soil over time. Biochar was produced at 300 °C (SSB300) and 500 °C (SSB500). P release from SSB increased with an increasing concentration of oxalic acid in the SSB incubation solution and in SSB-treated soil. P speciation in SSB showed that P was predominantly inorganic (Pi), which represented 81% and 92% of the total P in SSB300 and SSB500, respectively. Pi in SSB consisted mainly of non-apatite P, accounting for 91% and 96% of all Pi in SSB300 and SSB500, respectively. Because SSB is predominantly insoluble in water, oxalic acid is crucial for the release of P from SSB. Oxalic acid increased P release from SSB300 and SSB500 by 103- and 600-fold, respectively, compared to the control, from which P was extracted with water. Oxalic acid enhancement of P release from SSB increases the possibility of using SSB as a sustainable source of P for agriculture.

1. Introduction

Sewage sludge (SS) management has become a global challenge owing to the enormous amounts of SS produced in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) [1]. Furthermore, this challenge is expected to intensify as the global urban population increases [2]. On the other hand, SS can be applied in agricultural areas because it is rich in organic matter and macro- and micronutrients, such that it can be used as a fertilizer and soil amendment treatment [3]. However, SS may contain pathogens, heavy metals, and a range of organic pollutants that can be harmful to plants, human health, and the environment [4]. Therefore, SS must undergo additional treatment to ensure safe management and use in agricultural fields.
Currently, the most common methods for SS treatment include biological (e.g., anaerobic digestion and aerobic composting) and thermal treatments (e.g., dry and wet pyrolysis). In particular, the pyrolysis process typically involves a high temperature (>400 °C) to promote the decomposition of organic pollutants, the unavailability of heavy metals, and the elimination of pathogens, thus allowing the use of SS from both agricultural and environmental perspectives [5,6,7]. The solid product of SS pyrolysis is known as sewage sludge biochar (SSB). Further, SSB shows equal or higher concentrations of carbon and plant nutrients, such as phosphorus (P), than those found in the original SS [8,9].
Phosphorus is a critical element for sustaining a wide range of human activities, including food, fiber, and biofuel production. Indeed, agriculture is the sector with the highest demand for P, accounting for up to 90% of global demand. Consequently, the global application of P fertilizer on croplands has continued to escalate, rising from approximately 5 Tg P yr−1 in 1961 to 18 Tg P yr−1 in 2013 [10], surpassing the estimated safe planetary boundary of 6 to 12 Tg P yr−1 [11]. Moreover, projections indicate a further increase to 22–27 Tg P yr−1 by 2050 [12,13]. Additionally, soil erosion will exacerbate P scarcity, with losses ranging from 4 to 19 kg ha−1 yr−1 [14]. As economically viable reserves of natural P for fertilizer production are finite, the need to improve the methods for P recovery and recycling has become paramount.
SSB has a higher P concentration than biochar from other raw materials (e.g., legumes, grasses, wood waste, and manure) [15], reaching up to 6% [16,17]. Thus, several studies have explored the possibility of using SSB as a phosphate fertilizer [18,19,20,21] or as a matrix for the development of new, sustainable fertilizers. For example, in a field experiment, SSB increased the total P (Ptotal), organic P (Po), inorganic P (Pi), and available P fractions, maintaining these high values in the soil for at least two years after application ceased [22]. Owing to the varied composition of sewage and the type of treatment adopted in WWTPs, SSB shows a wide range of P chemical forms [23], which can be grouped into inorganic (60–90%) and organic (10–40%) forms [24] and are highly affected by pyrolysis conditions, especially temperature and residence time [25].
Consistently, SSB mixed with soil reportedly increases the available P content and, concomitantly, corn grain yield [26,27]. Therefore, SSB allegedly increases soil available P levels despite a very low concentration of water-soluble P [23]. Another relevant process affecting available P content is the reaction time with the soil [16]. The predominant form of inorganic P in SSB is Pi, which is found as mineral salts with metal cations, such as Fe, Al, Mg, and Ca, whereas Po is found mainly in microbial cell remains and various organic compounds [9,28]. Unfortunately, only a small fraction of Ptotal is available to plants [29]. Altogether, these variables make it difficult to recommend precise doses of SSB as P supply for soil fertilization purposes.
Consequently, it is crucial to devise new technical approaches to enhance the utilization of SSB as a phosphate fertilizer or as a matrix of biochar-based fertilizers. One promising method involves using low-molecular-mass organic acids that can improve the solubility of P in SSB, thereby increasing its release to the soil and hence its availability to plants. Soil microorganisms produce organic acids that are naturally present in the rhizosphere and are capable of solubilizing nutrients [30]. Indeed, several studies have shown the positive effects of organic acids on P solubilization from soil minerals [26,31,32]. The chelating potential is the main characteristic of organic acids responsible for increasing P solubilization. Organic acids bind to mineral ions, forming a strong bond, and then cause the release of previously insoluble minerals, in addition to affecting several biological processes that also lead to increased nutrient availability [33]. These acids can also solubilize the abundant inorganic P fractions in SSB. Among organic acids of microbial origin, oxalic acid stands out and may be more efficient than sulfuric acid for solubilizing P from phosphate rocks [32]. A case in point, Rossati [34] reported an increase in P solubilization after inoculating SSB with Aspergillus niger, a fungus that produces oxalic acid. This finding indicated the potential of this organic acid to increase the efficiency of mineral P sources.
However, specific studies using oxalic acid with the aim of increasing P solubilization of SSB are still rare. Vause [35] analyzes the release of elements (Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na) in SSB using a mixed solution of citric, malic, and oxalic acid. Therefore, the use of oxalic acid to increase SSB-associated P solubilization will help us to (i) elucidate the role of organic acids in P solubilization from SSB applied to the soil and (ii) understand the role of oxalic acid in the development of SSB-based fertilizers. Specifically, studies involving a sequence of oxalic acid extractions directly from SSB and SSB-amended soils are scarce. Therefore, the following hypotheses were proposed: (i) oxalic acid increases the solubilization of P in SSB both in acidic solutions and in the soil, and (ii) P solubility in oxalic acid is different for SSB obtained at different pyrolysis temperatures. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the influence of oxalic acid on SSB-associated P solubilization from SSB obtained at two pyrolysis temperatures. This will help us to understand the dynamics of the release of P present in SSB and will also give the possibility of using this acid as an additive to sewage sludge biochar-based fertilizers with the aim of increasing the release of P and reducing the volume of SSB applied to the soil.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Production of SSB

The experimental biochar was produced from SS samples collected at the Melchior WWTP located in Samambaia, Distrito Federal, Brazil (15°52′21″ S, 48°9′4″ W). The SS samples were air-dried to approximately 10% moisture, passed through a 4 mm sieve, and then subjected to 300 °C (SSB300) or 500 °C (SSB500) in a pyrolysis furnace (Linn Elektro, Eschenfelden, Germany). The temperatures were chosen based on previous studies carried out by Figueiredo [7]. Biochar at these temperatures presents higher total and Mehlich 1 P concentrations, making it better suited for use as a fertilizer. The average rate of temperature increase was 2.5 °C min−1 and the pyrolysis time was 5 h. The furnace was equipped with a mechanism to prevent oxygen flow (via a forced draft fan, helping gas and oil vapors to exit the furnace). After pyrolysis, the biochar was ground and sieved through a 1 mm mesh.

2.2. Chemical, Mineralogical, and Thermogravimetric Characterization of SS and SSB

2.2.1. Chemical Characterization of SSB

The chemical properties of SS, SSB300, and SSB500 were quantitatively analyzed as outlined in Table 1. The pH was determined in a 0.01 mol L−1 CaCl2 solution (1:5 w/v) according to [36]. The moisture content was determined as a function of weight loss after heating the sample to 105 °C [37]. Total C and N contents were determined using an elemental analyzer (Euro EA3000 Elemental Analyzer, Milano, Italy). The C:N ratio was estimated from the total C and N contents. Macro- and micronutrients and heavy metals were determined after acid digestion with HNO3/HCl (3:1 v/v) according to [38] and quantified as follows: P was determined using the vanado-molybdo-phosphoric acid method; K was determined by flame photometry; and Ca, Mg, micronutrients, and heavy metals were determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) (ICPE-9000, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), according to Brazil [39].

2.2.2. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

X-ray diffraction analysis was conducted using a diffractometer (D8 Focus, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). Powder XRD patterns were obtained using monochromatic Cu Kα radiation at 40 kV, 30 mA, with 2θ between 10 and 70°, with steps of 2θ 0.05, and a speed of 1-degree min−1. The peak areas identified for the different minerals were compared with the XRD patterns of standard minerals compiled by the International Center for Diffraction Data (ICDD).

2.3. Phosphorus Sequential Extraction

During the pyrolysis process, P fractions undergo transformations that alter the level of P solubility and, consequently, its availability to plants. To understand P transformations, several analytical procedures can be adopted. Since Pi is the main form of P in SSB, in the present study, the standards, measurements, and testing program (SMT) for P extraction were used [40]. This procedure made it possible to quantify Pi, apatite P, and non-apatite P contents in the biochar samples. Two procedures were performed. First, a 16 h extraction in 1 mol L−1 NaOH was performed to remove the extractable P. The residue was extracted with 1 mol L−1 HCl for 16 h to obtain apatite P associated with carbonates. An aliquot of the initial NaOH solution was removed and treated for 16 h with a 3.5 mol L−1 HCl solution to obtain non-apatite P associated with Fe, Al, and Mn oxides and hydroxides. In a second procedure, a new SSB sample was extracted in a 1 mol L−1 HCl solution for 16 h to obtain Pi.
In addition, the simplified procedure of Hedley [41] was used to quantify the levels of Ptotal and then Po. Ptotal was determined by acid digestion with H2SO4 and H2O2 in the presence of a saturated MgCl2 solution [41]. In turn, Po was calculated by subtracting Pi from Ptotal.

2.4. Experiment I: Solubilization of P from Biochar by an Oxalic Acid Solution

An incubation experiment was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of an oxalic acid solution in solubilizing P from the biochar. The incubation was conducted at room temperature (~25 °C). Sterilized 50 mL conical centrifuge tubes were filled with 0.4 g of SSB300 or SSB500 and 40 mL of oxalic acid solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at concentrations of 0.33, 0.67, and 1.00 mol L−1. SSB samples were incubated in triplicate for 10 d. To determine the amount of solubilized P, aliquots of the solution were collected at 3, 12, and 24 h and at 2, 5, 7, and 10 d. The control treatment consisted of SSB in distilled water.
Samples collected at each time point were centrifuged at 3300 rpm for 5 min. This was followed by slow filtration through filter paper (80 g m−2 and pore size of 8 μm). The soluble P concentration was determined using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) (ICP-7000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.5. Experiment II: Incubation of Biochar in Soil

In a second incubation experiment, we evaluated the influence of oxalic acid on the dynamics of P release from SSBs applied to the soil [42], for which purpose, soil samples were collected from the topsoil layer (0–20 cm) of a Typical Ustorthent (clay sand) located at the experimental farm (15°56′45″ S, 47°55′43″ W; 1095 m a.s.l.) of the University of Brasília. Soil samples were air-dried and passed through a 2.0 mm mesh sieve; subsequently, they were incubated after the application of a rate equivalent to 4 Mg ha−1 of dolomitic limestone to increase the pH to 6.0. The soil samples were chemically characterized according to Teixeira [43] (Table 2). The soil pH was determined in CaCl2 0.01 mol L−1 (1:2.5 w/v). Phosphorous and K contents were extracted by Mehlich-1 (HCl 0.05 mol L−1 + H2SO4 0.0125 mol L−1) and determined by spectrophotometry and flame photometry, respectively. Ca+2 and Mg+2 were extracted by KCl 1 mol L−1 and estimated by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) (ICPE-9000, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The H + Al was extracted with a 0.5 mol L−1 calcium acetate solution at pH 7.0. Cation exchange capacity (CEC), aluminum saturation (m), and base saturation (V) were estimated by the indirect method [43]. Particle size analysis was carried out using the hydrometer method using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) 4 g L−1 + sodium hexametaphosphate 10 g L−1 as chemical dispersant. Soil bulk density was determined in undisturbed soil samples collected using metallic cylinders with an approximate volume of 100 cm3. Soil particle density was determined by the pycnometer method. The specific surface area was determined by N2 adsorption isotherms at −196.2 °C using a surface area analyzer, NOVA 2200 (Quantachrome Corp., Boynton Beach, FL, USA). Soil electrical conductivity was determined at a soil/water ratio of 1:2 (v/v). This incubation test was laid in a completely randomized design with three replicates. The following treatments were evaluated: no biochar (control), SSB300, and SSB500. The treatments were duplicated; oxalic acid was applied at a concentration of 1 mol L−1. The control treatments consisted of distilled water or an oxalic acid solution at the same concentration without biochar.
Samples (5 g) of the two biochars (SSB300 and SSB500) were packed in sachets of permeable polyester mesh (<0.500 mm) measuring 5 cm × 4 cm. The sachets containing SSB were placed in a 200 cm3 plastic container containing 50 g of soil. The sachets were covered with 50 g of soil. The soil samples in the containers were moistened with distilled water to maintain a water content corresponding to a water tension of 10 kPa, which is defined as the field capacity (FC). The soil samples were subjected to different tensions using the Richards chamber method for FC determination as described by Ndoung [45]. Using a precision scale, soil humidity was monitored at 5 d intervals and maintained at FC, based on the weight of the container.
The containers prepared with the soil and the sachets filled with the SSBs remained in the incubation room at a temperature of ~25 °C for the following periods: 12 h and 2, 5, 15, 30, and 60 d after the start of incubation. The containers were removed from the incubator once the incubation period established for each treatment had elapsed, and the sachet was carefully separated from the soil. The entire soil mass was homogenized, and an aliquot was withdrawn to determine the extractable P content in the Mehlich 1 solution, which was estimated by the colorimetric method using a spectrophotometer (Tecnal, UV-5100) at 660 nm. The P content of the controls with and without oxalic acid solution was subtracted to determine the amount of P solubilized from the SSB materials. Both experiments (I and II) were performed in 2023.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data from the SSB solubility experiments in oxalic acid solution (experiment I) and incubation in soil (experiment II) were adjusted using the following nonlinear regression models:
Hyperbola; double rectangular, four-parameter:
P = a t b + t + c t d + t
Exponential single, 2-parameter:
P = a ( 1 e b t )
Exponential decay; double, 4-parameter:
P = a e b t + c e d t
Exponential double, 4-parameter:
P = a 1 e b t + c ( 1 e d t )
Exponential linear combination:
P = y 0 + a e b t + c t
Modified hyperbola:
P = a t 1 + b t
where P is the solubilized phosphorus content (mg L−1 or mg kg−1); t is the incubation time (days); and a, b, c, and d, are constants calculated using a nonlinear regression procedure. The model that best represented the data distribution was selected based on statistical significance (p-value) and the coefficient of determination (R2).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Mineralogical Characteristics of SSB

XRD was used to identify the crystal structures in SSB samples. The main phases in both SSBs tested herein were quartz (SiO2) and aluminum phosphate (AlPO4), although SSB300 also showed the presence of aluminum oxide (Al2O3) and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) (Figure 1). The detection of AlPO4 indicated the stable presence of non-apatite P, which confirmed the effect of the AlSO4 used to precipitate P in the coagulation stage of the treatment that produced the SS used in this study. Additional characterization, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential thermogravimetric (DTG) and energy-dispersive (XRD) analyses were carried out in order to better understand the materials analyzed, and the results are presented in Figures S1 and S2.

3.2. Sequential Extraction of P Present in SSB300 and SSB500

Sequential P extraction showed that SSB500 had a higher concentration of Ptotal than SSB300, at 4.64% and 3.92%, respectively (Figure 2), confirming that an increase in pyrolysis temperature favored the concentration of P in SSB500 [7]. Additionally, Pi was the predominant form of P in SSB, accounting for 80.6% and 92.2% of Ptotal in SSB300 and SSB500, respectively. In contrast, both SSBs had a low concentration of Po, although that of SSB300 was higher than that of SSB500 (0.67% and 0.32%, respectively). These results indicate that Po was partially converted into Pi during SS pyrolysis in a temperature-dependent manner, as previously reported [46].
Non-apatite P was the predominant form of Pi, accounting for 91% and 96% of all Pi in SSB300 and SSB500, respectively. Most P found in SSB was in the form of AlPO4 (Figure 1), formed during the precipitation of P with aluminum sulfate during the effluent treatment. This is probably the reason for the low availability of P in the soil when only water was applied to the soil amended with SSB (as shown later in Section 3.4), because non-apatite P has a lower availability for plants than apatite P [47]. In acidic media, both forms of Pi (apatite P and non-apatite P) are solubilized.

3.3. Solubilization of P from Biochar in Oxalic Acid Solution

The oxalic acid solution promoted greater P solubilization in both SSB samples than that observed in the water-treated control, regardless of the concentration. Indeed, P solubilization was approximately 103 and 600 times higher in SSB300 and SSB500, respectively, than that in the control (Figure 3; Table S1). These results showed that the P forms present in SSB are insoluble in water but were effectively solubilized in acidic media. In fact, when the solution is acidic, both apatite and non-apatite P dissolve readily [47]. In addition, our results demonstrate that it is possible to use oxalic acid to increase the efficiency of SSB as a fertilizer.
The solubilizing action of oxalic acid on P in SSB depended on the acid concentration (Figure 3). However, surprisingly, pH values were the same in the three acid concentrations (Figure S3). In general, 0.67 and 0.33 M oxalic acid promoted similar P solubility. Furthermore, at the highest concentration (i.e., 1 M), there was a significant decrease in P solubilization compared to the other concentrations. Therefore, these results suggest that, under the conditions of this study, the use of oxalic acid concentrations higher than 0.33 M would not be recommended. Similar results were found by Mendes [32] when using oxalic acid to solubilize phosphate rocks. They observed that, at high concentrations of oxalic acid, calcium oxalate precipitation occurred on the phosphate rock surfaces, which slowed the solubilization of P. This phenomenon is common in the fertilizer production industry during sulfuric acid attacks on phosphate rocks owing to calcium sulfate [32,48]. All individual P and pH values are presented in Table S4 and Figure S4.
The maximum percentage of total P released from SSB300 in the presence of oxalic acid was 41.5% (at 7 d), 38.9% (at 12 h), and 40.9% (at 12 h) at concentrations of 0.33, 0.67, and 1 M, respectively (Figure 4). In contrast, SSB500 released 37.7%, 32.6%, and 19% of Ptotal at 0.33, 0.67, and 1 M, respectively. Therefore, oxalic acid solubilized a higher percentage of P in SSB300 than in SSB500, presumably owing to the higher Po content in the former case (Figure 2B).
The higher amount of P solubilized from SSB500 in the first 12 h was explained by the higher concentration of Ptotal, apatite P, and non-apatite P (Figure 2) in that case, which was immediately solubilized in the presence of oxalic acid. The reduction in solubilized P content in SSB500 after 12 h of incubation can be partially explained by the possible re-adsorption of P by SSB500. This adsorptive capacity of biochar has been previously reported [49,50]. Because of its physicochemical properties such as high specific surface area, microporosity, high adsorption capacity, and ion exchange, biochar is a good adsorbent for phosphates and other ions such as heavy metals [6,51,52]. Increasing pyrolysis temperature increases the surface area and pore volume [53,54]. This also occurs for other types of biochar. For example, cotton stalk biochar pyrolyzed at 500 °C showed greater adsorption capacity than that obtained at lower temperatures [55]. This re-adsorption capacity of SSB500 might be interesting for tropical soils that have a high capacity to form inner-sphere complexes with P. Thus, SSB500 might function as a slow-release P fertilizer, as has been previously reported [56,57,58].
Acidification of the medium also favored the solubilization of other elements in SSB, including heavy metals. The increase in the concentration of oxalic acid resulted in the greater solubilization of heavy metals such as cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), manganese (Mn), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) (Table S2). However, in all evaluations, the concentrations of heavy metals were below the maximum limits allowed for biochar, fertilizers and soils according to the regulations of Brazil [59], the European Union [60], and the International Biochar Initiative (IBI) [61] Long-term field studies on the effect of the application of SBB of essentially domestic origin on the dynamics of heavy metals indicate the feasibility of using SBB in soil, without risks of contamination with heavy metals [62,63]. However, additional investigations are necessary to ensure the safety of the application of SSB from industrialized regions.

3.4. Solubilization of P from Biochar in the Soil

Oxalic acid (1 M) did not promote greater solubilization of P from SSB applied as a soil amendment (Figure 5). A higher acid concentration was selected based on previous tests to circumvent the dilution effect of the applied solution, which is common when applying low-molecular-weight organic acids to soil [64]. Table S3 shows the nonlinear regression models that best fit the P solubilization data from SSB-treated soil in the presence or absence of oxalic acid. Oxalic acid increased the solubilization of P from both SSB treatments compared to the water-only control (Figure 5). The ability of oxalic acid to solubilize P from phosphates present in poorly soluble rocks is well established [65], and this effect is enhanced in the presence of SSB [34]. Oxalic acid can also desorb P fixed to the soil [66]. Hence, this study presents new strategies for combining SSB with oxalic acid to make SSB an effective phosphate fertilizer.
The concentration of P extracted from SSB500-treated soil was higher than that extracted from the SSB300-treated soil over the entire experimental period. Higher concentrations of Ptotal, apatite P, and non-apatite P in SSB500 (Figure 2) allowed for a greater release of P into the soil. The greatest release of P from SSB500 into the soil occurred shortly after the application of oxalic acid, specifically, 12 h after the start of the experiment. After this peak, the P content of the soil decreased over time. Similar behavior was observed for SSB300, but with a smaller decrease in P concentration over time. These results were similar to the behavior of SSBs in solution, in which case, there was a significant reduction in the concentration of P in the SSB500 solution after 12 h of incubation. In soil, this reduction may be due to the re-adsorption of P by the SSB or the soil. Alternatively, it may be due to the neutralization of oxalic acid over time, whereby it would lose its solubilizing power. Similar to SSB500, after the application of SSB300 to the soil, there was an increase in P release followed by a reduction over time. As explained for SSB500, the reduction in the release may have occurred through a re-adsorption process or a decrease in the acid solubilization power. Regarding SSB300, P re-adsorption directly onto the biochar probably did not occur, since SSB300 has a lower adsorption power due to its less complex carbon structure than SSB500 [67]. Thus, in SSB300, the P re-adsorption behavior probably occurred through P adsorption to the soil or acid degradation over time [68].

4. Conclusions

The findings summarized herein validate our hypothesis that oxalic acid enhances the solubility of P in SSB, both in solution and soil. Pi is the primary type of P in SSB, and non-apatite P compounds constitute approximately 91% and 96% of Pi in SSB300 and SSB500, respectively. These compounds represent a major portion of P present in SSB. Particularly, SSB500 demonstrated a greater capacity to release P into both the solution and soil, although it may re-adsorb some of the solubilized P over time. Our results underscore the efficacy of oxalic acid in promoting the release of P from SSB, thereby ultimately increasing P availability to plants. Oxalic acid is one of the organic acids naturally found in soil. Therefore, the use of this type of acid in fertilizer formulations has a lower impact on the soil than conventional fertilizers, in addition to promoting an efficient release of nutrients for plants. In this way, the use of biochar-based fertilizers acidified with organic acids contributes to more sustainable agricultural production. Furthermore, our study opens new avenues for exploring novel research directions focused on the development of fertilizers derived from biochar and organic acids. Future research should focus on exploring the impact of oxalic acid on the release of P from SSB in the soil–plant system. Finally, acidified SSB should be studied as a matrix for biochar-based fertilizers.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agriculture14091607/s1: Figure S1: Thermogravimetric (TGA) and differential thermogravimetric (DTG) analysis conducted in an inert atmosphere for sewage sludge biochar samples produced at 300 (SSB300) and 500 °C (SSB500). Analysis carried out in an alumina crucible, under an inert atmosphere (N2) with a gas flow of 50 mL min−1 from room temperature to 1000 °C at a heating rate of 20 °C min−1; Figure S2: Spectra of energy-dispersive (DRX) analysis. Obtained using an EDX 720HS spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan); Figure S3: pH values in different oxalic acid solutions over a 10-day incubation; Figure S4: pH values in soil amended with sewage sludge biochar (SSB) in the presence or absence of oxalic acid (OA) over the time. H: hours; D: days; Table S1: Coefficient of determination (R2) and standard error in the solubilization of pyrolyzed biochar at 300 °C (SSB300) and 500 °C (SSB500); Table S2: Concentrations of heavy metals released into the oxalic acid solution from sewage sludge biochar (SSB) produced at 300 and 500 °C; Table S3: Coefficient of determination (R2) and standard error in the solubilization of pyrolyzed biochar at 300 °C (SSB300) and 500 °C (SSB500) in the presence or absence of oxalic acid (OA); Table S4: Concentrations of solubilized P in soil.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.C.d.F.; methodology, M.G.B.d.S., C.R.C., and A.B.P., formal analysis, M.G.B.d.S., C.R.C., L.S.P., and J.d.L.C.; data curation, M.G.B.d.S., C.R.C., and C.C.d.F.; writing—original draft preparation M.G.B.d.S.; writing—review and editing, G.d.O.M., G.M., É.d.S.M., and C.C.d.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal, grant number 00193-00002230/2022-71; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), grant number APQ-02351-23; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), grant numbers 314216/2023-5 and 406261/2022-9.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for the scientific productivity fellowship granted to G.d.O.M, É.d.S.M., and C.C.d.F.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ding, A.; Zhang, R.; Ngo, H.H.; He, X.; Ma, J.; Nan, J.; Li, G. Life Cycle Assessment of Sewage Sludge Treatment and Disposal Based on Nutrient and Energy Recovery: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 769, 144451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pujara, Y.; Pathak, P.; Sharma, A.; Govani, J. Review on Indian Municipal Solid Waste Management Practices for Reduction of Environmental Impacts to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 248, 109238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. D’Imporzano, G.; Adani, F. Measuring the Environmental Impacts of Sewage Sludge Use in Agriculture in Comparison with the Incineration Alternative. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 905, 167025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhao, L.; Sun, Z.F.; Pan, X.W.; Tan, J.Y.; Yang, S.S.; Wu, J.T.; Chen, C.; Yuan, Y.; Ren, N.Q. Sewage Sludge Derived Biochar for Environmental Improvement: Advances, Challenges, and Solutions. Water Res. X 2023, 18, 100167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bloem, E.; Albihn, A.; Elving, J.; Hermann, L.; Lehmann, L.; Sarvi, M.; Schaaf, T.; Schick, J.; Turtola, E.; Ylivainio, K. Contamination of Organic Nutrient Sources with Potentially Toxic Elements, Antibiotics and Pathogen Microorganisms in Relation to P Fertilizer Potential and Treatment Options for the Production of Sustainable Fertilizers: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 607–608, 225–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Elkhlifi, Z.; Sellaoui, L.; Zhao, M.; Ifthikar, J.; Jawad, A.; Shahib, I.I.; Sijilmassi, B.; Lahori, A.H.; Selvasembian, R.; Meili, L.; et al. Lanthanum Hydroxide Engineered Sewage Sludge Biochar for Efficient Phosphate Elimination: Mechanism Interpretation Using Physical Modelling. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 803, 149888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. de Figueiredo, C.C.; de Souza Prado Junqueira Reis, A.; de Araujo, A.S.; Blum, L.E.B.; Shah, K.; Paz-Ferreiro, J. Assessing the Potential of Sewage Sludge-Derived Biochar as a Novel Phosphorus Fertilizer: Influence of Extractant Solutions and Pyrolysis Temperatures. Waste Manag. 2021, 124, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hossain, M.K.; Strezov Vladimir, V.; Chan, K.Y.; Ziolkowski, A.; Nelson, P.F. Influence of Pyrolysis Temperature on Production and Nutrient Properties of Wastewater Sludge Biochar. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lu, S.S.; Sheng, Q.; Wang, J.J.; Yuan, S.J.; Dong, B.; Xu, Z.X. A Combination of Conventional Extraction and Advanced Analytical Techniques Afford a Comprehensive Understanding of Phosphorus Distribution and Transformation in Sewage Sludge Biochars. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 477, 146954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lu, C.; Tian, H. Global Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizer Use for Agriculture Production in the Past Half Century: Shifted Hot Spots and Nutrient Imbalance. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2017, 9, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Springmann, M.; Clark, M.; Mason-D’Croz, D.; Wiebe, K.; Bodirsky, B.L.; Lassaletta, L.; de Vries, W.; Vermeulen, S.J.; Herrero, M.; Carlson, K.M.; et al. Options for Keeping the Food System within Environmental Limits. Nature 2018, 562, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hamilton, H.A.; Ivanova, D.; Stadler, K.; Merciai, S.; Schmidt, J.; Van Zelm, R.; Moran, D.; Wood, R. Trade and the Role of Non-Food Commodities for Global Eutrophication. Nat. Sustain. 2018, 1, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mogollón, J.M.; Bouwman, A.F.; Beusen, A.H.W.; Lassaletta, L.; van Grinsven, H.J.M.; Westhoek, H. More Efficient Phosphorus Use Can Avoid Cropland Expansion. Nat. Food 2021, 2, 509–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Alewell, C.; Ringeval, B.; Ballabio, C.; Robinson, D.A.; Panagos, P.; Borrelli, P. Global Phosphorus Shortage Will Be Aggravated by Soil Erosion. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Beesley, L.; Moreno-Jiménez, E.; Gomez-Eyles, J.L.; Harris, E.; Robinson, B.; Sizmur, T. A Review of Biochars’ Potential Role in the Remediation, Revegetation and Restoration of Contaminated Soils. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 3269–3282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Q.; Fang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Ruan, X.; Zhang, X.; Cao, W. Phosphorus Speciation and Bioavailability of Sewage Sludge Derived Biochar Amended with CaO. Waste Manag. 2019, 87, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sichler, T.C.; Adam, C.; Montag, D.; Barjenbruch, M. Future Nutrient Recovery from Sewage Sludge Regarding Three Different Scenarios—German Case Study. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 333, 130130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fachini, J.; de Figueiredo, C.C.; Frazão, J.J.; Rosa, S.D.; da Silva, J.; Vale, A.T. do Novel K-Enriched Organomineral Fertilizer from Sewage Sludge-Biochar: Chemical, Physical and Mineralogical Characterization. Waste Manag. 2021, 135, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hansen, D.S.; Turcios, A.E.; Klamt, A.M.; Wieth, C.; Reitzel, K.; Thomsen, M.H.; Papenbrock, J. Characterization of Biochar Produced from Sewage Sludge and Its Potential Use as a Substrate and Plant Growth Improver. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 348, 119271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Marcińczyk, M.; Oleszczuk, P. Biochar and Engineered Biochar as Slow- and Controlled-Release Fertilizers. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qian, T.T.; Jiang, H. Migration of Phosphorus in Sewage Sludge during Different Thermal Treatment Processes. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1411–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. de Figueiredo, C.C.; Pinheiro, T.D.; de Oliveira, L.E.Z.; de Araujo, A.S.; Coser, T.R.; Paz-Ferreiro, J. Direct and Residual Effect of Biochar Derived from Biosolids on Soil Phosphorus Pools: A Four-Year Field Assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 739, 140013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Steckenmesser, D.; Vogel, C.; Adam, C.; Steffens, D. Effect of Various Types of Thermochemical Processing of Sewage Sludges on Phosphorus Speciation, Solubility, and Fertilization Performance. Waste Manag. 2017, 62, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yu, B.; Luo, J.; Xie, H.; Yang, H.; Chen, S.; Liu, J.; Zhang, R.; Li, Y.Y. Species, Fractions, and Characterization of Phosphorus in Sewage Sludge: A Critical Review from the Perspective of Recovery. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 786, 147437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Adhikari, S.; Gascó, G.; Méndez, A.; Surapaneni, A.; Jegatheesan, V.; Shah, K.; Paz-Ferreiro, J. Influence of Pyrolysis Parameters on Phosphorus Fractions of Biosolids Derived Biochar. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 695, 133846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Marra, L.M.; de Oliveira-Longatti, S.M.; Soares, C.R.F.S.; Olivares, F.L.; de, S. Moreira, F.M. The Amount of Phosphate Solubilization Depends on the Strain, C-Source, Organic Acids and Type of Phosphate. Geomicrobiol. J. 2019, 36, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, H.; Luo, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, D.; Huang, R.; Ma, C.; Zhu, Y.G.; Liu, Z. Speciation Evolution of Phosphorus and Sulfur Derived from Sewage Sludge Biochar in Soil: Ageing Effects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 6639–6646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Suh, S.; Yee, S. Phosphorus Use-Efficiency of Agriculture and Food System in the US. Chemosphere 2011, 84, 806–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schneider, F.; Haderlein, S.B. Potential Effects of Biochar on the Availability of Phosphorus—Mechanistic Insights. Geoderma 2016, 277, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Meena, V.S.; Maurya, B.R.; Verma, J.P. Does a Rhizospheric Microorganism Enhance K+ Availability in Agricultural Soils? Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kpomblekou-A, K.; Tabatabai, M.A. Effect of Low-Molecular Weight Organic Acids on Phosphorus Release and Phytoavailabilty of Phosphorus in Phosphate Rocks Added to Soils. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2003, 100, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. de Oliveira Mendes, G.; Dyer, T.; Csetenyi, L.; Gadd, G.M. Rock Phosphate Solubilization by Abiotic and Fungal-Produced Oxalic Acid: Reaction Parameters and Bioleaching Potential. Microb. Biotechnol. 2022, 15, 1189–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sindhu, S.S.; Sehrawat, A.; Glick, B.R. The Involvement of Organic Acids in Soil Fertility, Plant Health and Environment Sustainability. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rossati, K.F.; de Figueiredo, C.C.; de, O. Mendes, G. Aspergillus Niger Enhances the Efficiency of Sewage Sludge Biochar as a Sustainable Phosphorus Source. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vause, D.; Heaney, N.; Lin, C. Differential Release of Sewage Sludge Biochar-Borne Elements by Common Low-Molecular-Weight Organic Acids. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 165, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. USEPA. Soil and Waste pH. Method 9045D; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
  37. American Society for Testing and Materials—ASTM. ASTM D1762: Standard Test Method for Chemical Analysis of Wood Charcoal; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  38. da Silva, F.C. Manual de Análises Químicas de Solos, Plantas e Fertilizantes; Embrapa Informação Tecnológica: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009; 627p. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Manual De Métodos Analíticos Oficiais Para Fertilizantes e Corretivos; Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (MAPA): Brasília, Brazil, 2017; ISBN 9788579911095. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ruban, V.; López-Sánchez, J.F.; Pardo, P.; Rauret, G.; Muntau, H.; Quevauviller, P. Selection and Evaluation of Sequential Extraction Procedures for the Determination of Phosphorus Forms in Lake Sediment. J. Environ. Monit. 1999, 1, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hedley, M.J.; Stewart, J.W.B.; Chauhan, B.S. Changes in Inorganic and Organic Soil Phosphorus Fractions Induced by Cultivation Practices and by Laboratory Incubations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1982, 46, 970–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bley, H.; Gianello, C.; Santos, L.D.S.; Selau, L.P.R. Nutrient Release, Plant Nutrition, and Potassium Leaching from Polymer-Coated Fertilizer. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo 2017, 41, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Teixeira, P.C.; Donagemma, G.K.; Fontana, A.; Teixeira, W.G. Manual de Métodos de Análise de Solo; Embrapa Solos: Brasília, Brazil, 2017; ISBN 9788570357717. [Google Scholar]
  44. Leão, T.P.; Domingues Da Costa, B.F.; Bof Bufon, V.; Fidel, F.; Aragón, H. Using Time Domain Reflectometry to Estimate Water Content of Three Soil Orders under Savanna in Brazil. Geoderma Reg. 2020, 21, e00280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ndoung, O.C.N.; de Souza, L.R.; Fachini, J.; Leão, T.P.; Sandri, D.; de Figueiredo, C.C. Dynamics of Potassium Released from Sewage Sludge Biochar Fertilizers in Soil. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 346, 119057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, F.; Zhang, X.; Song, M.; Li, R. Pyrolysis of Sewage Sludge to Biochar: Transformation Mechanism of Phosphorus. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2023, 173, 106065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xu, Q.; Tang, S.; Wang, J.; Ko, J.H. Pyrolysis Kinetics of Sewage Sludge and Its Biochar Characteristics. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 115, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Schrödter, K.; Al, E. Phosphoric Acid and Phosphates. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000; pp. 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Luo, D.; Wang, L.; Nan, H.; Cao, Y.; Wang, H.; Kumar, T.V.; Wang, C. Phosphorus Adsorption by Functionalized Biochar: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2023, 21, 497–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, S.; Wang, B.; Gao, Q.; Gao, Y.; Liu, S. Adsorption of Phosphorus by Different Biochars. Spectrosc. Lett. 2017, 50, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ahmad, M.; Rajapaksha, A.U.; Lim, J.E.; Zhang, M.; Bolan, N.; Mohan, D.; Vithanage, M.; Lee, S.S.; Ok, Y.S. Biochar as a Sorbent for Contaminant Management in Soil and Water: A Review. Chemosphere 2014, 99, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Guo, X.; Zhu, L.; Xu, X.; Ma, M.; Zou, G.; Wei, D. Competitive or Synergetic? Adsorption Mechanism of Phosphate and Oxytetracycline on Chestnut Shell-Derived Biochar. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 370, 133526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Khater, E.S.; Bahnasawy, A.; Hamouda, R.; Sabahy, A.; Abbas, W.; Morsy, O.M. Biochar Production under Different Pyrolysis Temperatures with Different Types of Agricultural Wastes. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhao, B.; O’Connor, D.; Zhang, J.; Peng, T.; Shen, Z.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Hou, D. Effect of Pyrolysis Temperature, Heating Rate, and Residence Time on Rapeseed Stem Derived Biochar. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 174, 977–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Khalid, U.; Ali, M. The Influence of Pyrolysis Temperature on the Performance of Cotton Stalk Biochar for Hexavalent Chromium Removal from Wastewater. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2024, 235, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, R.; Wang, J.J.; Zhou, B.; Awasthi, M.K.; Ali, A.; Zhang, Z.; Lahori, A.H.; Mahar, A. Recovery of Phosphate from Aqueous Solution by Magnesium Oxide Decorated Magnetic Biochar and Its Potential as Phosphate-Based Fertilizer Substitute. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 215, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rehman, R.A.; Qayyum, M.F.; Haider, G.; Schofield, K.; Abid, M.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, S. The Sewage Sludge Biochar and Its Composts Influence the Phosphate Sorption in an Alkaline-Calcareous Soil. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zheng, Y.; Wang, B.; Wester, A.E.; Chen, J.; He, F.; Chen, H.; Gao, B. Reclaiming Phosphorus from Secondary Treated Municipal Wastewater with Engineered Biochar. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 362, 460–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Brazil. Instrução Normativa SDA No 27, 05 De Junho De 2006. Available online: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/insumos-agropecuarios/insumos-agricolas/fertilizantes/legislacao/in-sda-27-de-05-06-2006-alterada-pela-in-sda-07-de-12-4-16-republicada-em-2-5-16.pdf (accessed on 28 August 2024).
  60. European Union. Regulamento (UE) 2019/1009 Do Parlamento Europeu e Do Conselho de 5 de Junho de 2019 Que Estabelece Regras Relativas à Disponibilização de Produtos Fertilizantes No Mercado e Que Altera Os Regulamentos (CE) n.o 1069/2009 e (CE) n.o 1107/2009 e Revoga o Regulamento (CE) n.o 2003/2003. J. Of. Da União Eur. 2019. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32022D1244&from=EN (accessed on 28 August 2024).
  61. IBI. Standardized Product Definition and Product Testing Guidelines for Biochar That Is Used in Soil (Aka IBI Biochar Standards); International Biochar Initiative: Norfolk, VA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  62. Bogusz, A.; Oleszczuk, P. Effect of Biochar Addition to Sewage Sludge on Cadmium, Copper and Lead Speciation in Sewage Sludge-Amended Soil. Chemosphere 2020, 239, 124719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Chagas, J.K.M.; de Figueiredo, C.C.; da Silva, J.; Paz-Ferreiro, J. The Residual Effect of Sewage Sludge Biochar on Soil Availability and Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals: Evidence from a Three-Year Field Experiment. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 279, 111824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Van Hees, P.A.W.; Vinogradoff, S.I.; Edwards, A.C.; Godbold, D.L.; Jones, D.L. Low Molecular Weight Organic Acid Adsorption in Forest Soils: Effects on Soil Solution Concentrations and Biodegradation Rates. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2003, 35, 1015–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rodrigues, N.A.; Buffo, M.M.; Casciatori, F.P.; Farinas, C.S. New Approaches for Solubilization of Phosphate Rocks through Solid-State Fermentation by Optimization of Oxalic Acid Production. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 408, 131165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. do Nascimento, J.M.; Vieira Netto, J.A.F.; Valadares, R.V.; de Oliveira Mendes, G.; da Silva, I.R.; Vergütz, L.; Costa, M.D. Aspergillus Niger as a Key to Unlock Fixed Phosphorus in Highly Weathered Soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2021, 156, 108190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Aktar, S.; Hossain, M.A.; Rathnayake, N.; Patel, S.; Gasco, G.; Mendez, A.; de Figueiredo, C.; Surapaneni, A.; Shah, K.; Paz-Ferreiro, J. Effects of Temperature and Carrier Gas on Physico-Chemical Properties of Biochar Derived from Biosolids. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2022, 164, 105542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Palmieri, F.; Estoppey, A.; House, G.L.; Lohberger, A.; Bindschedler, S.; Chain, P.S.G.; Junier, P. Oxalic Acid, a Molecule at the Crossroads of Bacterial-Fungal Interactions. In Advances in Applied Microbiology; Academic Press Inc.: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; Volume 106, pp. 49–77. ISBN 9780128169759. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra of SSB300 (A) and SSB500 (B). 1: Aluminum phosphate; 2, quartz (SiO2); 3, aluminum oxide; 4, sodium silicate.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra of SSB300 (A) and SSB500 (B). 1: Aluminum phosphate; 2, quartz (SiO2); 3, aluminum oxide; 4, sodium silicate.
Agriculture 14 01607 g001
Figure 2. The speciation of phosphorus in SSB300 and SSB500. Pi, inorganic P; Po, organic P; Ptotal, total P. Total P (A), organic and inorganic P (B), and apatite and non-apatite P (C).
Figure 2. The speciation of phosphorus in SSB300 and SSB500. Pi, inorganic P; Po, organic P; Ptotal, total P. Total P (A), organic and inorganic P (B), and apatite and non-apatite P (C).
Agriculture 14 01607 g002
Figure 3. Release of P from sewage sludge biochar (SSB) over time in solutions of oxalic acid of increasing concentration. SSB300 (A) and SSB500 (B). *** indicates p < 0.001.
Figure 3. Release of P from sewage sludge biochar (SSB) over time in solutions of oxalic acid of increasing concentration. SSB300 (A) and SSB500 (B). *** indicates p < 0.001.
Agriculture 14 01607 g003
Figure 4. Maximum percentage of P solubilized from sewage sludge biochar (SSB) at different concentrations of oxalic acid. The values represent the percentage of Ptotal released from SSBs over time at different concentrations of oxalic acid. For SSB300: 0.33 (7 d), 0.67, and 1 M (12 h); for SSB500: 0.33, 0.67, and 1 M (12 h).
Figure 4. Maximum percentage of P solubilized from sewage sludge biochar (SSB) at different concentrations of oxalic acid. The values represent the percentage of Ptotal released from SSBs over time at different concentrations of oxalic acid. For SSB300: 0.33 (7 d), 0.67, and 1 M (12 h); for SSB500: 0.33, 0.67, and 1 M (12 h).
Agriculture 14 01607 g004
Figure 5. Release of P from SSB-treated soil over time (days) in the presence of oxalic acid (OA) or water. SSB300water and SSB300OA are sewage sludge biochars produced at 300 °C and treated with water and OA solution, respectively. SSB500water and SSB500OA are sewage sludge biochars produced at 500 °C and treated with water and OA solution, respectively. Error bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3). *** indicates p < 0.0001.
Figure 5. Release of P from SSB-treated soil over time (days) in the presence of oxalic acid (OA) or water. SSB300water and SSB300OA are sewage sludge biochars produced at 300 °C and treated with water and OA solution, respectively. SSB500water and SSB500OA are sewage sludge biochars produced at 500 °C and treated with water and OA solution, respectively. Error bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3). *** indicates p < 0.0001.
Agriculture 14 01607 g005
Table 1. Characteristics of sewage sludge (SS) and SS pyrolyzed at 300 °C (SSB300) and 500 °C (SSB500).
Table 1. Characteristics of sewage sludge (SS) and SS pyrolyzed at 300 °C (SSB300) and 500 °C (SSB500).
PropertiesSSSSB300SSB500
pH (CaCl2)6.46.06.4
Moisture (%)18.56.61.5
Total C (%)28.825.0423.16
P (Total) (%)2.23.94.6
K2O (Total) (%)0.240.240.43
Total N (%)3.74.213.40
Ca (%)0.50.640.85
Mg (%)0.210.250.29
S (%)0.820.751.18
Cu (mg kg−1)105115168
Fe (mg kg−1)19,80020,50020,490
Mn (mg kg−1)100105149
Zn (mg kg−1)460480690
C:N Ratio7.85.96.8
Cd (mg kg−1)33.02.0
Ni (mg kg−1)131512
Pb (mg kg−1)6332.044.0
Table 2. Chemical and physical characteristics of the soil (adapted from Leão [44]).
Table 2. Chemical and physical characteristics of the soil (adapted from Leão [44]).
Atribute 1UnityValue
pH (CaCl2)-5.2
P (Mehlich 1) mg dm−31.0
K mg dm−326.0
Ca cmolc dm−32.0
Mg cmolc dm−30.8
H + Al cmolc dm−31.6
CEC 1cmolc dm−34.47
M 2%0.0
V 3%64.0
OM 4g kg−120.0
Clayg kg−1105.3
Sandg kg−1846.8
Siltg kg−147.9
Bulk densityg cm−31.1
Particle densityg cm−32.5
Specific surface aream2 g−13.0
Electrical conductivity mS cm−10.157
1 CEC: cation exchange capacity; 2 m: aluminum saturation; 3 V: base saturation; 4 OM: organic matter.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santos, M.G.B.d.; Costa, C.R.; Mendes, G.d.O.; Blasi Paiva, A.; Peixoto, L.S.; Costa, J.d.L.; Marchi, G.; Martins, É.d.S.; Figueiredo, C.C.d. Oxalic Acid Boosts Phosphorus Release from Sewage Sludge Biochar: A Key Mechanism for Biochar-Based Fertilizers. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14091607

AMA Style

Santos MGBd, Costa CR, Mendes GdO, Blasi Paiva A, Peixoto LS, Costa JdL, Marchi G, Martins ÉdS, Figueiredo CCd. Oxalic Acid Boosts Phosphorus Release from Sewage Sludge Biochar: A Key Mechanism for Biochar-Based Fertilizers. Agriculture. 2024; 14(9):1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14091607

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santos, Marcela Granato Barbosa dos, Camila Rodrigues Costa, Gilberto de Oliveira Mendes, Andressa Blasi Paiva, Ludmila Soares Peixoto, Jéssica da Luz Costa, Giuliano Marchi, Éder de Souza Martins, and Cícero Célio de Figueiredo. 2024. "Oxalic Acid Boosts Phosphorus Release from Sewage Sludge Biochar: A Key Mechanism for Biochar-Based Fertilizers" Agriculture 14, no. 9: 1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14091607

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop