Next Article in Journal
MSDP-Net: A YOLOv5-Based Safflower Corolla Object Detection and Spatial Positioning Network
Previous Article in Journal
Structural Design and Analysis of Bionic Shovel Based on the Geometry of Mole Cricket Forefoot
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dual Environmental Regulation and Carbon Emission Reduction in Pig Breeding Industry: Synergistic Effect or Crowding-Out Effect? Evidence from China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Metabolic Profile Changes and Early Detection of Nitrogen Deficiency in Sweet Corn

1
Department of Chemistry, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
2
Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2025, 15(8), 856; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15080856
Submission received: 12 March 2025 / Revised: 5 April 2025 / Accepted: 10 April 2025 / Published: 15 April 2025

Abstract

:
In this study, we investigate the nutrient supply of young corn (Zea mays var. rugosa) plants using conventional biological and chemical methods, as well as the N-glycan and metabolic profile of the plant sap using the MALDI-MS. Corn plants with three different nutrient supplies were grown on sandy soil for 45 days after emergence. In treatment 1 (T1), used as a control, the plants did not receive any nutrient supplementation. Plants in treatment 2 (T2) received “ideal” N-, P-, and K-nutrient supplementation in the form of inorganic fertilizers. In treatment 3 (T3), the plants were provided with the ideal amount of P and K, and a reduced amount of N fertilizer. In addition to the amount of biomass of the young plants, macronutrient content (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) was measured in the dry matter. We examined the amount of 0.01 M CaCl2-soluble N fractions of the experimental soils, and the P, K, Ca, and Mg content of their ammonium lactate (AL)-soluble fractions. We were unable to statistically distinguish between T1, T2, and T3 treatments using conventional methods (in this phenophase). Metabolic profiles in the sap from young plants, captured by MALDI-MS, showed significant differences between the control, “ideal”, and N-deficient treatments. This method may also be suitable for early detection of N-deficient conditions in other plants.

1. Introduction

In Hungary, corn is a widely cultivated arable crop. Its yield is highly dependent on environmental factors (precipitation, atmospheric drought). These stress factors can be sustainably reduced by applying appropriate agronomic practices [1]. Water and nutrients have great interactions. Good nutrient supply results in favorable water use, increasing water use efficiency (WUE) [2].
Plants absorb nutrients from the soil for their vital activity, to produce crops and by-products. Therefore, to maintain the fertility of the soil, it is necessary to replenish the nutrients they extract. The quantity and quality of crops produced by plants (in arable and horticultural crops) are largely determined by their (macro- and microelements) nutrient supply [3,4,5,6]. This is also the case with corn [7].
Nitrogen is the macronutrient that plants generally require in large quantities and has the greatest impact on crop yield. However, its excessive application can increase fungal infection in corn [8], lead to an imbalance in the plant’s metabolic processes [9], and affect the uptake of other nutrients [10,11].
Early detection of plant nutrient deficiencies (in particular N deficiency) in a sustainable manner (with preferably few laboratory measurements) is an important challenge from both a crop safety and economic perspective. Biological and chemical methods are used to assess the nutrient supply of soils. Biological methods include traditional laboratory leaf and plant analyses, whereas chemical methods determine the amounts of different nutrient forms in soils [12].
One of the early indicators of non-harmonious nutrient supply and nutrient deficiency in plants can be the changes in the quality and quantity of free-type, N-linked glycans [13,14].
There is increasing use of metabolomics directed at detecting the effect of nutritional changes on plant metabolism. In particular, the metabolic fingerprint of nitrogen deficiency has been studied in Arabidopsis thaliana [15], tea plant (Camellia sinensis L.) [16], and rice [17]. These studies relied on Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance MS of plant extracts, UPLC-MS, and HPLC-MS, respectively, resulting in low-sample throughput. With large-scale applications in mind, we opted to use a high-throughput MALDI-MS approach for sap analysis.
Growing A. thaliana under nitrogen-deficient conditions was found to modulate secondary metabolism, in particular glucosinolate production. The tea study was focused on the changes in flavonoid profile under different nitrogen supplementation conditions. Comparing metabolite profiles under normal and nitrogen-deficient growth conditions for rice revealed that the latter led to the increased production of stress response compounds, e.g., carbohydrates, and an increase in the level of amino sugars and nucleotide sugars.
With our experimental results, we aim to prove that nutrient deficiencies in the early phenophase of plants, which cannot yet be detected by traditional methods, induce changes in the quality and quantity of free N-glycans found in plant sap.
The main roles of N-glycans in plant cells are in the folding of proteins, and in the recognition and degradation of proteins with incorrect spatial structures [18,19,20]. They are also important in the biosynthesis of plant cellulose and in plant cell-wall formation [21,22]. N-glycans are important for the regulation of cytokinins, as in the absence of N-glycans, errors may occur in the folding of the polypeptide chain of cytokinin receptors [23]. Inhibited N-glycan formation leads to root and shoot development problems [24]. Mutant plants producing reduced N-glycans are characterized by poorer stress tolerance and reduced immune response [25].
Previous studies indicated a correlation between nutrient deficiency and changes in oligosaccharide, free N-glycan, and metabolite profiles in young tomato plants [14]. In this work, we expanded these investigations to the potential detection of nutrient deficiency in the early phenophase of corn plants grown on sandy soil deficient in soluble nitrogen compounds. Beyond the conventional characterization of soil and young plant material, high-performance mass spectrometry-based metabolomics was implemented to compare the effect of “ideal” and nitrogen-deficient nutrient supplementation on the small molecule composition of plant sap. If successful, this method can be applied for the early detection of nitrogen deficiency on a large scale.

2. Materials and Methods

The experiment was set up with sweet corn (Zea mays var. rugosa) test plants in the greenhouse of the Institute of Agrochemistry and Soil Science at the University of Debrecen, on sandy soil, with three treatments and three replications. The most important physical and chemical characteristics of the soil are listed in Table 1.
Based on the nutrient supply limit values of the MÉM NAK Hungarian fertilizer recommendation system, the soil of the experiment showed a poor supply of nitrogen, medium supply of phosphorus, and good supply of potassium [12,29].
We weighed 3.5 kg of air-dried sandy soil into the culture pots (diameter: 18.5 cm; depth: 14 cm). When calculating the nutrient supply, we used the specific nutrient requirement of sweet corn (N: 25 kg/t, P2O5: 13 kg/t, K2O: 22 kg/t yield) and calculated with a medium (9–10 t/ha) average yield. We also took into account the nutrient supply level of the soils. (M = Q × fkor (M: Fertilizer active ingredient requirement (kg ha−1), Q: Expected crop, fkor: corrected specific active ingredient requirement.))
Treatment 1 (T1), the sandy soil with no nutrient supplementation, was used as a control. The plants relied on the nutrients originally found in the soil for their development. Plants in treatment 2 (T2) received N, P, and K nutrient supplementation in the form of an inorganic fertilizer to emulate “ideal” conditions. In treatment 3 (T3), the maize plants were supplied with the same amount of P and K as in T2, and a reduced amount of nitrogen fertilizer, thereby inducing an N-deficient state. Nitrogen and phosphorus were added as NH4H2PO4 (0.288 g 3.5 kg−1 soil) and NH4NO3 (0.878 g 3.5 kg−1 soil) solutions, whereas potassium was supplied as KCl (0.477 g 3.5 kg−1 soil) solution. The treatment plan is presented in Table 2.
The soils were mixed, and the plants were sown on 15 May 2023 and emerged on 22 May. We started the development of four plants in each pot. The soil in the culture pots was watered daily to a water supply level of 50% of the maximum water retention capacity. The plants developed under the same temperature and light conditions as the external conditions. The experiment was terminated on 6 July (45 days after plant emergence, i.e., V4. stage). At that time, plant and soil samples were taken, as well as plant sap.
The total nitrogen content of dry sweet corn (leaf and stem) samples was determined using an elemental analyzer operating on the combustion principle (“dry combustion method”) [30]. To determine the plant element content, the samples were decomposed at 220 °C (cc. H2SO4:30W/W%H2O2 = 1:1 volume). The P content of the decomposition product was determined photometrically using the molybdenum blue method [31], and the K, Ca, and Mg contents were measured using an atomic absorption (AA) spectrometer (Varian AA10 Plus).
The amount of ammonium lactate (AL)-soluble K, P, Ca, and Mg (AL-soluble represents the fraction of the nutrient that is easily absorbed by plants) was determined in the soil of the treatments. The P content of the AL filtrates [27,32] was measured photometrically [33], and the amount of K, Ca, and Mg was measured with an AA spectrometer (Varian AA10 Plus). The amounts of 0.01M CaCl2 soluble NO3-N, NH4+-N, and organic N-forms in the soils [28,34] were measured with a continuous flow device (Skalar, SA2000/4000 Segmented Flow Analyzer, HQ-Skalar Analytical BV, Breda, The Netherlands).
For the statistical evaluation of our results (plant and soil element contents), we used the one-way analysis of variance (Tukey test) of the SPSS (Version: 28.0.0.0.(190)) program. We performed correlation calculations between the examined parameters.
The saps were collected according to the protocol described by Tsujimori et al. [35] and then lyophilized. In the summer of 2023, the lyophilized samples were transported to the Vertes laboratory at the Department of Chemistry, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA, where metabolites, including free oligosaccharides and N-glycans were analyzed in the samples by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS).
From the lyophilized sap, a 1 mg sample was resuspended in 500 µL of HPLC-grade water (W5-4, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and mixed for 20 min at room temperature. The resuspended lyophilate was centrifuged (Centrifuge 5430 R, Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany) at 11,000 rpm for 20 min and the resulting supernatant was collected for MS measurements. The 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) (Catalog no. 58707, Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) MALDI matrix was dissolved in methanol (A452-4, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 10 mg/mL and mixed with the supernatant at a 5:2 ratio.
Aliquots of 1 µL of the resulting mixture were deposited onto a stainless steel MALDI sample plate and left to air-dry. Measurements were conducted on a MALDI-LTQ-Orbitrap XL MS (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) with a resolving power set to 30,000 for an acquisition range of m/z 150 to 2000. The nitrogen laser used for ion production delivered 10 pulses with 4 µJ energy each for every sample spot. Calibration of the mass spectrometer was achieved by using a commercial kit (MSCAL4, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louise, MO, USA).
After selecting the significant peaks with S/N > 3 and deisotoping, the resulting m/z values were searched against the GlycoMod database in Expasy (https://web.expasy.org/glycomod/, accessed on 18 February 2025) for tentative assignments of possible oligosaccharides and N-glycans. Comparative statistical analysis of the T1, T2, and T3 dataset was accomplished by the MetaboAnalyst online resource (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/MetaboAnalyst/, accessed on 18 February 2025). For the statistical models, peak intensities were normalized by the sum of sample-related ion abundances, log transformed, and subjected to Pareto scaling. Pareto scaling, often used in metabolomics, is based on normalization of a variable by the square root of its standard deviation. It ensures that ion intensities with large and small fold changes in a comparative analysis retain similar importance. Due to the robust signal in both the MALDI-MS and NAPA-LDI-MS measurements, there was no need for missing value imputation. Biomarker candidates were identified by univariate (volcano plot) and multivariate (orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA)) statistical methods.
For the tentative identification of metabolites, the accurate m/z values for the spectral features of interest were searched against the organism-specific metabolite database within PlantCyc, i.e., the Z. mays database (https://pmn.plantcyc.org/organism-summary?object=CORN; last accessed on 22 February 2025). Based on the mass accuracy of the instrument, the searches were conducted with Δm = ±20 mDa mass tolerance. In some cases, quasi-isobaric ions within this window were distinguished based on the comparison of the measured isotope distributions with patterns calculated by the enviPat online platform (https://www.envipat.eawag.ch/, accessed on 3 April 2025). Other cases resulting in alternative assignments stemmed from structural isomers. These could not be resolved without additional measurements, e.g., by separation techniques.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Plant Material Characterization

At this early phenophase of maize development, i.e., in the V4 stage, the dry matter yield of unfertilized plants (T1) at 0.867 ± 0.416 g was statistically lower (p = 0.003) than that of fertilized plants T2 at 2.300 ± 0.300 g and T3 at 1.800 ± 0.100 g (see Table 3). There was no significant difference (p = 0.186) in plant biomass between nitrogen-deficient (T3) and ideal (T2) treatments.
By examining the N concentrations measured in the dry matter of the plants (see Table 3), it can be established that the plants with ideal nutrient supply treatment (T2) had an exceptionally high N concentration (36.73 ± 1.749). Based on this property, they can be statistically separated from the plants with the other two treatments (p = 0.000). The N concentration (10.48 ± 0.423) of the plants fertilized with a reduced amount of N (T3) is almost the same as that of the unfertilized, control (T1) plants (10.62 ± 0.740), so the plants of these two treatments can be classified into the same group based on this property. The two N concentrations are not significantly different (p = 0.988). Plants in T3 treatments produced a higher biomass mass than plants in T1 treatment, so the N concentration decreased due to the dilution effect.
The P concentrations measured in the dry matter of young maize (see Table 3) indicate that the plants with treatments providing P supplementation (T3) but producing a smaller biomass mass have the highest value (6.434 ± 0.244) (p = 0.001). Only small differences can be observed between the P concentrations of the plants of the control (T1) (4.671 ± 0.206) and the ideal (T2) (4.980 ± 0.240) treatments, so they cannot be separated from each other based on this parameter (p = 0.301).
The lowest K concentration (19.40 ± 2.651) (see Table 3), was measured in the control (T1) plants not fertilized with potassium (p = 0.010). No significant difference (0.627) was observed in the K concentrations of the plants with T2 (30.23 ± 2.151) and T3 (31.78 ± 0.325) treatments that received the same K fertilizer dose but different N doses.
Intensive (large-scale) nutrient uptake by corn began in this phenophase, but their incorporation into organic matter had not yet occurred, so we do not experience large differences in the biomass mass produced.
Overall, nutrient deficiency cannot be clearly detected in this early phenophase of the corn plant by examining the concentrations of the fertilized nutrients. A large part of the nitrogen reservoir in plant tissue is present in the form of proteins and nucleic acids. Measuring the total nitrogen in the plant does not separate these abundant nitrogen containing species; therefore, small changes in nitrogen levels due to altered metabolism are initially not noticeable.
We also measured the concentrations of two non-fertilized macronutrients (Ca and Mg) in the dry matter of the plants (see Table 3). The supply of N, P, and K nutrients did not significantly (p = 0.072) affect the Ca concentrations in the plants with the three treatments. The Mg concentration of the plants with T1 (4.958 ± 0.218) and T2 (5.000 ± 0.636) treatments was very similar, whereas that of the plants with T3 (2.642 ± 0.083) treatment was significantly lower (p = 0.001). Nevertheless, nutrient deficiencies cannot be detected based solely on the concentrations of the two unfertilized nutrients examined.
We also examined the correlations between the parameters measured in young maize plants. There was a positive correlation between the plant biomass mass and the nitrogen (r = 0.69, p = 0.04), calcium (r = 0.66, p = 0.05), and potassium (r = 0.70, p = 0.03) concentrations of the plant. A similar positive significant relationship was also found between the N concentration and the Ca content (r = 0.76, p = 0.02) of the maize grown in our experiment. We obtained a very strong negative correlation between plant P and Mg concentrations (r = −0.93, p < 0.01).

3.2. Plant-Accessible Nutrient Changes in Soil

The AL-soluble K concentrations (K2O mg/kg) of soil samples taken at the termination of the experiment decreased during the growing season. It changed from 218.3 mg/kg at the beginning to 210.8 ± 3.136 mg/kg in the soil without K supplementation (T1) (p = 0.003). The K concentration of the soils with treatments with different N but the same K supplementation was almost the same, 220.6 ± 4.373 mg/kg for T2 and 220.5 ± 2.550 mg/kg for T3. We could not statistically distinguish the three treatments based on the AL-K concentration of the soil.
The AL-soluble P concentration (P2O5 mg/kg) showed a slight increase during the growing season, changing from the initial 88.1 mg/kg to 90.7 ± 0.294 mg/kg. According to the data, the transformation and release of phosphorus into an easily absorbable form occurred more intensively than its uptake by plants from the soil. As expected, significantly lower P concentrations (p = 0.001) were measured in the soils of the control (T1) treatment than in the soils of the other two treatments. Based on this parameter, we could not separate the soils of the T2 (117.1 ± 3.171 mg/kg) and T3 (122.0 ± 2.631 mg/kg) treatments (p = 0.154). The concentrations of the two non-fertilized macronutrients (Ca and Mg) in the AL-soluble fractions, 514.0 ± 50.71 mg/kg, 530.7 ± 42.16 mg/kg, and 602.5 ± 44.96 mg/kg for T1, T2, and T3, respectively (p = 0.083), for Ca, and 74.1 ± 1.973 mg/kg, 73.5 ± 8.164 mg/kg, and 73.7 ± 4.244 mg/kg for T1, T2, and T3, respectively, for Mg, showed no statistically significant (p = 0.989) differences between treatments. Compared to their presence in the soil, their concentrations decreased during the growing season (compare values to Table 1).
We also examined the amount of 0.01M CaCl2-soluble total N, and the nitrate-, ammonium-, and organic-N fractions in the soil (Figure 1). The amount of 0.01M CaCl2-soluble N forms in the soil for the “ideal” nutrient supply treatment (T2) showed statistically verifiable higher values than those measured in the soils of the control (T1) and reduced N-dose treatments (T3). High N-dose fertilization (T2) increased these parameters of the soils, whereas in the control (T1) and the N-deficient case (T3), the amount of CaCl2-soluble total-N significantly decreased as a result of cultivation (compare values in Table 1 and Figure 1). Based solely on these soil parameters, the T1 and T3 treatments cannot be separated. By measuring the element content of different soil extractants, we can examine nutrient fractions that are bound to different strengths in the soil. With the methods we used, we wanted to determine the soluble forms and the forms that are easily absorbed by plants. Plant nutrient uptake is influenced by many factors, so these methods are also somewhat uncertain in assessing nutrient supply.
The correlations between the parameters measured in the soils indicate that there is a close positive relationship between the AL-soluble K and P concentrations in the soils (r = 0.80, p = 0.01). We also observed a very strong positive correlation between the 0.01 M CaCl2-soluble N forms (CaCl2 total-N—CaCl2 nitrate-N r = 1.00, p < 0.01; CaCl2 total-N—CaCl2 ammonium-N r = 0.99, p < 0.01; CaCl2 total-N—CaCl2 organic-N r = 0.99, p < 0.01).
Correlations between plant and soil properties are shown in Table 4. There is a significant positive effect between the plant product and the AL-soluble K and P concentrations of the soil, as well as the 0.01 M CaCl2-soluble N forms. We observed a close correlation between the plant N concentration and the 0.01 M CaCl2-soluble N forms. There is a statistically verifiable positive relationship between plant phosphorus and the AL-soluble P and Ca concentrations of the soil. In addition, there is a very close positive correlation between the plant P concentration and the AL-soluble K and P concentrations in the soil. There is also a very strong, statistically verifiable positive relationship between the plant Ca concentration and the 0.01 M CaCl2-soluble N forms in the soil. We observed a significant negative relationship between the plant Mg concentration and the AL-soluble Ca concentration of the soil. Other researchers have also looked for a relationship between the element content of the plant and the 0.01M CaCl2-soluble N forms of the soil [36].

3.3. Nutritional Changes in Corn Sap Metabolites

Nutritional shortcomings and the application of fertilizers are known to alter plant metabolism. Modern methods of metabolomics give an in-depth insight into the nature and level of metabolites affected by nutritional supplementation [14,37]. To explore the changes in metabolite composition in young corn as a result of supplementing macronutrients and in the presence of nitrogen deficit, resuspended sap samples from the plants with control (T1), “ideal” (T2), and nitrogen-deficient (T3) treatments were studied by MALDI-MS. Representative positive ion mass spectra in the m/z 50 to 4000 range from the three sample types are shown in Figure 2. Hundreds of spectral features were observed, and their m/z values and intensities were extracted in the 50 < m/z < 2500 range for the three treatment types.
As we were interested in the presence of oligosaccharides and N-glycans, the peak lists were searched against the GlycoMod database with ∆m = ±20 mDa mass tolerance for tentative assignments. A selected list of potential structures is shown in Table 5. At this stage, no tandem mass spectra were collected, thus, structural isomers of the assigned species cannot be excluded. Also, in some cases, quasi-isobaric ions were consistent with a particular measured accurate mass. For example, for m/z 1011.185, two very different ionic species, sodiated (Hex)5 (Sulph)2 and potassiated (Hex)4 (Deoxyhexose)1 (Phos)2, satisfied the search tolerance requirements. Further studies involving tandem mass spectrometry are needed to clarify if one, the other, or both species are present. Comparison of the oligosaccharide and N-glycan species present and their abundances for the studied treatment types revealed no major differences, so we shifted the focus to spectral features with more variations.
Numerous other peaks, corresponding to small metabolites, were observed. Attempting their identification is a monumental undertaking due to the need for extensive additional experiments. Therefore, a subset of peaks was selected that appeared both biologically and statistically significant for the different treatments. Biological significance was gauged by peak-intensity fold change (FC) values, e.g., IT1/IT2, to compare the control to the “ideal” fertilizer treatment, whereas statistical significance was measured by the p values for pairwise t tests. Conventional cutoff values for significance are FC < 0.5 or FC > 2, and p < 0.05. The volcano plots in Figure 3 show the detected peaks in a -log10 p versus log2 FC space. The dashed lines indicate the cutoff values for both metrics. Points under the horizontal dashed line and between the vertical dashed lines, colored gray, lack statistical and biological significance, respectively.
In this univariate analysis, the top right quadrant in the top panel (T1 to T2 comparison) shows the species upregulated under control treatment, whereas the top left quadrant contains the species upregulated under “ideal” treatment. The bottom panel compares the “ideal” (T2) to the nitrogen-deficient (T3) treatments. In this panel, the top right quadrant shows the species upregulated under “ideal” treatment, whereas the top left quadrant contains the species upregulated under nitrogen-deficient treatment. Overall, the control to “ideal” comparison results in a total of 40 regulated species, whereas the “ideal” to nitrogen-deficient comparison yields 170 regulated species. This finding establishes the presence of major metabolic profile changes as a function of nutrient supply. Not all regulated species impact the spectra to the same degree. Identification of the species corresponding to points with the highest significance is much more manageable and meaningful than trying to develop assignments to all points in the volcano plot.
A deeper analysis of metabolomics data can be achieved by multivariate statistical analysis. This approach takes into account the simultaneous interactions between multiple components in a complex mass spectrum. A method offering specific advantages in metabolomics is OPLS-DA. In Figure 4, both the control to “ideal” treatment (left panel) and the “ideal” to nitrogen-deficient treatment (right panel) comparisons show good separation between the treatments. The vertical separation of the points shows the differences in outcome for a specific treatment. To identify the spectral features responsible for most of the variance between the spectra, the correlation as a function of the covariance has to be plotted. In these S-plots (see Figure 5), the points with high absolute correlation and covariance, i.e., the points in the wings of the plot deserve close attention. The numerous points in between are typically ignored due to their much lower significance. It is worth noting that some of the prominent features flagged by the S-plot, e.g., m/z 174.98, 383.07, 635.86, and 251.11, have also been present in the volcano plots.
To further identify the peaks with the most impact, the variable influence on projection (VIP) scores can be calculated. Figure 6 shows the VIP scores for the 15 most influential peaks for each of the control to “ideal” treatment (top panel) and the “ideal” to nitrogen-deficient treatment (bottom panel) comparisons.
Searching the PlantCyc Z. mays database (https://pmn.plantcyc.org/organism-summary?object=CORN; last accessed on 22 February 2025) for metabolites consistent with the ions showing high VIP scores, a list can be compiled for the control (T1) to “ideal” supplementation (T2) comparison (Table 6). The search considered protonated, sodiated, and potassiated ion adducts with a ∆m = ±20 mDa mass tolerance. The regulated secondary metabolites in this treatment comparison belong to organonitrogen compounds (e.g., N-pyruvoyl-glutamate, hydroxymethyl-dihydropterin, preQ1, and hexosamine), flavonoids (e.g., flavanone-O-glucoside, hydroxy-salvigenin, and nevadensin), and lipids (e.g., zealexin B1, traumatin, and hydroxylaurate). Hexosamine is a key metabolite in the biosynthesis of uridine diphosphate-N-acetyl glucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) essential for protein glycosylation. Although there is no biosynthesis of preQ1 in corn, it is perceivable that a structural isomer of this molecule with five nitrogen atoms is modulated by nitrogen-deficient nutrition.
A similar analysis was performed for the comparison of “ideal” nutrient supplementation (T2) and the nitrogen-deficient treatment (T3) (Table 7). The regulated secondary metabolites in this treatment comparison belong to organonitrogen compounds (e.g., sulfino-alanine, amino-hydroxybenzoate, and glutamate-semialdehyde), flavonoids (e.g., baicalein O-glucoside, and genistin), lipids (e.g., hydroxy traumatin, epoxy-oxododecanoate, and traumatate), amino acids and intermediates in amino acid metabolism (hydroxyproline, 5-aminolevulinate, proline, glutamate-semialdehyde, and hydroxyanthranilate), glutathione derivatives (S-lactoylglutathione hemithioacetal, and S-lactoylglutathione), and a glycan (N,N’-diacetylchitobiose). Nitrogen deficiency itself is a major stress, so separating a generic stress response from it is challenging. One can distinguish the reallocation of nitrogen to other metabolites, e.g., amino acids and other organonitrogen compounds, and a metabolic response that does not involve nitrogen, e.g., flavonoids and lipids.
In the iterative multistep process of metabolite identification, four levels of confidence are distinguished. These levels are defined by the Metabolomics Standard Initiative (MSI) [38]. The putative assignments in Table 6 and Table 7 rely on accurate mass measurements and searches in relevant databases. Without tandem MS and/or another orthogonal measurement technique, structural isomers and quasi-isobaric species cannot be ruled out. Therefore, they correspond to level 2 or level 3 assignments according to the MSI classification.
Comparing VIP scores for the “ideal” nutrition and the nitrogen-deficient cases listed in Table 7, a tentatively identified metabolic marker profile can be assembled. Among the key markers are some organonitrogen compounds, sulfino-alanine, amino-hydroxybenzoate, and glutamate-semialdehyde), amino acids and intermediates in amino acid metabolism, hydroxyproline, 5-aminolevulinate, and hydroxyanthranilate, and a glycan, N,N’-diacetylchitobiose. Notably, consistent with the altered supply of nitrogen, all of these molecules carry one or more nitrogen atoms.
Overall, multivariate analysis of MALDI-MS spectra not only clearly distinguishes the three treatment types, but also gives information about the particular species, with a potential to uncover metabolic pathways up- or downregulated by them. Monitoring the metabolic profile of the developing plants can be used to titrate the amount and select the timing of nitrogen fertilizer supplementation. This prevents overfertilization and reduces GHGI (e.g., in the form of nitrous oxide) emission.

4. Conclusions

Plant and soil analytical experiments were carried out to discern metabolic markers of nutrient supplementation and deficient nitrogen supply for young corn plants. Monitoring solely the produced biomass and changes in inorganic macronutrients, N, P, K, Ca, and Mg, no differences were observed between the N concentrations measured in the dry matter from the control (T1) and low nitrogen supplementation (T3) treatments. The corresponding P concentrations did not show a difference between the plants produced by T1 and “ideal” supplementation (T2) treatments. The K concentrations for the plants with T2 and T3 treatments were almost identical. Similar results were found in the case of non-fertilized nutrients (Ca and Mg). At this early phenophase (45 days after plant emergence corresponding to the V4 stage), we did not observe a statistically significant difference in the element content measured in the dry matter as a function of the nutrient supply.
For the “ideal” (T2) and nitrogen-deficient (T3) treatments, the AL-soluble K and P concentrations of the soils could not be distinguished. There were no significant differences between the AL-soluble Ca and Mg concentrations for any of the treatments. Based on the amount of 0.01M CaCl2-soluble N fractions, the control and nitrogen-deficient treatments could not be distinguished from each other. The often-observed close correlations between plant and soil test results indicate that nutrient-deficiency states can be detected using traditional plant and soil analyses, but only in the later phenophases of plant development.
Metabolic profiles in the sap from young plants, captured by MALDI-MS, showed significant differences between the control, “ideal”, and N-deficient treatments. Although a limited number of N-glycans and oligosaccharides were detected, their variety and abundances revealed no major differences for the treatment types. Surprisingly, mostly changes in secondary metabolites were detected, although for the T2 to T3 comparison, changes in the abundances of a few amino acids and intermediates in amino acid metabolism were also noted. Multivariate analysis clearly distinguishes the three treatment types and pinpoints the spectral features that account for most of the variance between the spectra. Current putative assignment of metabolites to the spectral features relies on accurate mass and the search for established database corn metabolomic databases. Going forward, the fidelity of these identifications has to be improved, e.g., by tandem MS measurements. Other orthogonal techniques, such as HPLC or NMR, can also significantly improve the assignments. In addition, multiomics approaches, based on transcriptomics and metabolomics in addition to metabolomics, can go a long way to uncover the up- or downregulated metabolic pathways.
Conventional nutrient analysis is based on measuring total nitrogen in the plant, including the nitrogen present in proteins, nucleic acids, metabolites, and nitrogen present in inorganic form. Plant development relies on the abundance of nitrogen containing building blocks, i.e., water-soluble metabolites, for the synthesis of plant material. Metabolomics selectively measures and identifies such metabolites; thus, it is more appropriate for the detection of nutrient deficiency than total nitrogen measurements.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.K. and Z.S.; methodology, I.K. and A.V.; software, I.K. and M.D.; formal analysis, I.V., A.B.K., Z.L., T.N., A.I.K. and I.K.; investigation, M.D., Z.S., A.B.K., Z.L., A.I.K. and A.V.; resources, M.D., A.V., I.K. and I.V.; data curation, M.D., A.V. and I.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.D., A.V. and I.K.; writing—review and editing, M.D., A.V., A.B.K., Z.S., I.V. and I.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The set up of the experiment processed in the publication and the chemical analysis of the experimental samples were realized within the framework of the PNYR:11048-2021-1.2.4-TÉT grant. Preparation of the paper was supported by the University of Debrecen Program for Scientific Publication.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The set up of the experiment processed in the publication and the chemical analysis of the experimental samples were realized within the framework of the PNYR:11048-2021-1.2.4-TÉT grant. Thanks for the opportunity. Preparation of the paper was supported by the University of Debrecen Program for Scientific Publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kovács, P.; Sárvári, M. The effect of NPK fertilization and the number of plants on the yield of maize hybrids with different genetic base in half-industrial experiment. Acta Agrar. Debreceniensis 2016, 69, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, S.-X.; Wang, Z.-H.; Malhi, S.S.; Li, S.-Q.; Gao, Y.-J.; Tian, X.-H. Chapter 7 Nutrient and Water Management Effects on Crop Production, and Nutrient and Water Use Efficiency in Dryland Areas of China. Adv. Agron. 2009, 102, 223–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Osuji, G.O.; Reyes, J.C.; Mangaroo, A.S. Glutamate Dehydrogenase Isomerization: A Simple Method for Diagnosing Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Sufficiency in Maize (Zea mays L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 2395–2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Graeff, S.; Steffens, D.; Schubert, S. Use of reflectance measurements for the early detection of N, P, Mg, and Fe deficiencies in Zea mays L. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2001, 164, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Balla, M.; Szabó, M.; Lakatos, G. Opportunities in circular agriculture. Int. J. Eng. Manag. Sci. 2019, 4, 17–23. [Google Scholar]
  6. Nagy, P.T.; Gonda, I.; Dremák, P.; Holb, I. Study on the micronutrient content of soil and leaf of an organic apple orchard in Eastern Hungary. Int. J. Hortic. Sci. 2006, 12, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ssemugenze, B.; Ocwa, A.; Kuunya, R.; Gumisiriya, C.; Bojtor, C.; Nagy, J.; Széles, A.; Illés, Á. Enhancing Maize Production Through Timely Nutrient Supply: The Role of Foliar Fertiliser Application. Agronomy 2025, 15, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kádár, I. Lessons from the first decade of the long-term fertilization experiment in Mezőföld. In Magyar Tudományos Akadémia ATK Talajtani és Agrokémiai Intézet; Akaprint Nyomdaipari Kft.: Budapest, Hungary, 2012; p. 177. (In Hungarian) [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, L.; Li, K.K.; Shi, W.J.; Wang, X.L.; Wang, E.T.; Liu, J.F.; Sui, X.H.; Mi, G.H.; Tian, C.F.; Chen, W.X. Negative impacts of excessive nitrogen fertilization on the abundance and diversity of diazotrophs in black soil under maize monocropping. Geoderma 2021, 393, 114999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, R.; Sun, C.; Cai, S.; Liu, F.; Xie, H.; Xiong, Q. Research Progress in Crop Root Biology and Nitrogen Uptake and Use, with Emphasis on Cereal Crops. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tuiwong, P.; Lordkaew, S.; Veeradittakit, J.; Jamjod, S.; Prom-U-Thai, C. Efficacy of Nitrogen and Zinc Application at Different Growth Stages on Yield, Grain Zinc, and Nitrogen Concentration in Rice. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Loch, J.; Nosticzius, Á. Agrochemistry and Plant Protection Chemistry; Mezőgazda Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 2004; ISBN 963-286-053-5. (In Hungarian) [Google Scholar]
  13. Sasisekharan, R.; Raman, R.; Prabhakar, V. Glycomics approach to structure-function relationships of glycosaminoglycans. Biomed. Eng. 2006, 8, 181–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dolatmoradi, M.; Sándor, Z.; Vágó, I.; Lowy, D.; Vértes, Á.; Kincses, S. Nutrient supplementation-induced metabolic profile changes and early appearance of free N-glycans in nutrient deficient tomato plants revealed by mass spectrometry. Analyst 2024, 149, 2709–2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hirai, M.Y.; Yano, M.; Goodenowe, D.B.; Kanaya, S.; Kimura, T.; Awazuhara, M.; Arita, M.; Fujiwara, T.; Saito, K. Integration of transcriptomics and metabolomics for understanding of global responses to nutritional stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 10205–10210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, H.; Yao, Q.; Xia, E.; Gao, L. Metabolomics and Transcriptomics Analyses Reveal Nitrogen Influences on the Accumulation of Flavonoids and Amino Acids in Young Shoots of Tea Plant (Camellia sinensis L.) Associated with Tea Flavor. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 9828–9838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shen, T.; Xiong, Q.; Zhong, L.; Shi, X.; Cao, C.; He, H.; Chen, X. Analysis of main metabolisms during nitrogen deficiency and compensation in rice. Acta Physiol. Plant 2019, 41, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Strasser, R. Recent Developments in Deciphering the Biological Role of Plant Complex N-Glycans. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 897549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wormald, M.R.; Dwek, R.A. Glycoproteins: Glycan presentation and protein-fold stability. Structure 1999, 7, R155–R160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dwek, R.A.; Joao, H.C. Effects of glycosylation on protein structure and dynamics in ribonuclease B and some of its individual glycoforms. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993, 218, 239–244. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kang, S.J.; Frank, J.; Kang, H.C.; Kajiura, H.; Vikram, M.; Ueda, A.; Kim, S.; Bahk, D.J.; Triplett, B.; Fujiyama, K.; et al. Salt tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana requires maturation of N-glycosylated proteins in the Golgi apparatus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 5933–5938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nagashima, Y.; von Schaewen, A.; Koiwa, H. Function of N-glycosylation in plants. Plant Sci. 2018, 274, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fanata, W.I.; Lee, K.H.; Son, B.H.; Yoo, J.Y.; Harmoko, R.; Ko, K.S.; Ramasamy, N.K.; Kim, K.H.; Oh, D.B.; Jung, H.S.; et al. N-glycan maturation is crucial for cytokinin-mediated development and cellulose synthesis in Oryza sativa. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2013, 73, 966–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liebminger, E.; Hüttner, S.; Vavra, U.; Fischl, R.; Schoberer, J.; Grass, J.; Blaukopf, C.; Seifert, G.J.; Altmann, F.; Mach, L.; et al. Class I alpha-mannosidases are required for N-glycan processing and root development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2009, 21, 3850–3867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Takano, S.; Matsuda, S.; Funabiki, A.; Furukawa, J.-I.; Yamauchi, T.; Tokuji, Y.; Nakazono, M.; Shinohara, Y.; Takamure, I.; Kato, K. The rice RCN11 gene encodes β1,2-xylosyltransferase and is required for plant responses to abiotic stresses and phytohormones. Plant Sci. 2015, 236, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kincses, I.; Melendez, J.R.; Ramírez-Cando, L.; Burbano-Salas, D.; Lowy, D.; Nevarez, G.C.; Solórzano, V.T.; Arteaga, J.M.; Mendoza, B.; Sándor, Z. Soluble nitrogen forms in sand soil of Pallag: A quantitative report. F1000Research 2020, 9, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Egner, H.; Riehm, H.; Domingo, W.R. Untersuchungen über die chemische Bodeanalyse als Grundlage für die Beurteilung des Nährstoffzustandes der Böden. II. Chem. Extraktionsmethoden Zur Phosphor-Und Kaliumbestimmung. K. Lantbrukshögskolans Ann. 1960, 26, 199–215. [Google Scholar]
  28. Houba, V.J.G.; Novozamsky, I.; Temminghoff, E. Soil analysis procedures extraction with 0.01 M CaCl2—Wageningen Agricultural University Wageningen. Soil Plant Anal. 1994, 5, 12–22. [Google Scholar]
  29. Buzás, I.; Fekete, A. Fertilization Guidelines and Farm Calculation Method; MÉM NAK: Budapest, Hungary, 2004. (In Hungarian) [Google Scholar]
  30. Nagy, P.T. Applicability of elemental analyzers operating on the combustion principle in soil and plant tests. Agrokémia És Talajt. 2000, 49, 521–534. (In Hungarian) [Google Scholar]
  31. Thamm, F.; Krámer, M.; Sarkadi, J. Determination of phosphorus content in plants and fertilizers using the ammonium molybdovanadate method. Agrokémia És Talajt. 1968, 17, 145–156. (In Hungarian) [Google Scholar]
  32. Kristoffersen, A.Ø.; Krogstad, T.; Øgaard, A.F. Prediction of available phosphorus in soil: Combined use for crop production and water quality protection. J. Environ. Qual. 2020, 49, 1575–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Buzás, I. Physico-Chemical and Chemical Testing Methods of Soils; Mezőgazdasági Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1988. (In Hungarian) [Google Scholar]
  34. Jaszberenyi, I.; Loch, J.; Sarkadi, J. Experiences with 0.01 M Calcium Chloride as an Extraction Reagent for Use as a Soil Testing Procedure in Hungary. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1994, 25, 1771–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tsujimori, Y.; Ogura, M.; Rahman, M.Z.; Maeda, M.; Kimura, Y. Synthesis of functional glycopolymers and analysis of their immuno-suppression activity involved in pollen allergen specific Th2 immune response. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2019, 83, 1310–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kátai, J.; Vágó, I.; Nagy, P.T.; Lukács, V.E. Correlation between the nitrogen content of soil and element uptake of maize in a pot experiment. Cereal Res. Commun. 2006, 34, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wei, K.; Liu, M.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ruan, J.; Zhang, Q.; Cao, M. Metabolomics Reveal That the High Application of Phosphorus and Potassium in Tea Plantation Inhibited Amino-Acid Accumulation but Promoted Metabolism of Flavonoid. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sumner, L.W.; Amberg, A.; Barrett, D.; Beale, M.H.; Beger, R.; Daykin, C.A.; Fan, T.W.-M.; Fiehn, O.; Goodacre, R.; Griffin, J.L.; et al. Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis. Metabolomics 2007, 3, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. 0.01 M CaCl2 soluble N fractions (mg/kg soil) in soil at end of experiment. Note: data marked with the same letter are not significantly different at the significant level of p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 1. 0.01 M CaCl2 soluble N fractions (mg/kg soil) in soil at end of experiment. Note: data marked with the same letter are not significantly different at the significant level of p ≤ 0.05.
Agriculture 15 00856 g001
Figure 2. Mass spectra for corn sap samples from plants produced with different nutritional conditions: (top panel) control (T1), (middle panel) “ideal” N-, P-, and K-nutrient supplementation (T2), and (bottom panel) nitrogen-deficient nutrient supplementation (T3). Insets show peaks of lower intensity on an expanded vertical scale. Peaks with m/z values highlighted in pink potentially correspond to free oligosaccharides.
Figure 2. Mass spectra for corn sap samples from plants produced with different nutritional conditions: (top panel) control (T1), (middle panel) “ideal” N-, P-, and K-nutrient supplementation (T2), and (bottom panel) nitrogen-deficient nutrient supplementation (T3). Insets show peaks of lower intensity on an expanded vertical scale. Peaks with m/z values highlighted in pink potentially correspond to free oligosaccharides.
Agriculture 15 00856 g002
Figure 3. Volcano plots to detect up- and downregulated spectral features in T1, T2, and T3 samples. A total of 40 and 170 regulated species were found for T1 vs. T2 (top panel) and T2 vs. T3 (bottom panel) pairs, respectively. Points are labeled with the corresponding m/z values. For emphasis, false color scales encode the FC values.
Figure 3. Volcano plots to detect up- and downregulated spectral features in T1, T2, and T3 samples. A total of 40 and 170 regulated species were found for T1 vs. T2 (top panel) and T2 vs. T3 (bottom panel) pairs, respectively. Points are labeled with the corresponding m/z values. For emphasis, false color scales encode the FC values.
Agriculture 15 00856 g003
Figure 4. Score plots for OPLS-DA of MALDI-MS spectra. Score plots generated by OPLS-DA for the pairwise comparisons demonstrated clear distinctions between treatments.
Figure 4. Score plots for OPLS-DA of MALDI-MS spectra. Score plots generated by OPLS-DA for the pairwise comparisons demonstrated clear distinctions between treatments.
Agriculture 15 00856 g004
Figure 5. S-plots produced by OPLS-DA models. The most influential spectral features that distinguish the treatments are in the wings.
Figure 5. S-plots produced by OPLS-DA models. The most influential spectral features that distinguish the treatments are in the wings.
Agriculture 15 00856 g005
Figure 6. Spectral features with 15 as highest variable influence on projection (VIP) scores identifying species in order of their influence on the statistical model for T1 vs. T2 (top panel) and T2 vs. T3 (bottom panel).
Figure 6. Spectral features with 15 as highest variable influence on projection (VIP) scores identifying species in order of their influence on the statistical model for T1 vs. T2 (top panel) and T2 vs. T3 (bottom panel).
Agriculture 15 00856 g006
Table 1. Physical properties and chemical composition of sandy soil used as control (treatment 1, T1) [26].
Table 1. Physical properties and chemical composition of sandy soil used as control (treatment 1, T1) [26].
KA (Arany Plasticity Index)<30
pH (in H2O)7.00
Humus %0.6
Species soluble in AL [27]mg/kg
AL-P2O5 (mg/kg)88.1
AL-K2O (mg/kg)218.3
AL-Ca (mg/kg)612.0
AL-Mg (mg/kg)80.6
Species soluble in 0.01 M CaCl2 [28]mg/kg
0.01 M CaCl2 total-N6.5
0.01 M CaCl2 nitrate-N2.9
0.01 M CaCl2 ammonium-N2.5
0.01 M CaCl2 organic-N1.1
Table 2. Treatment plan of the experiment.
Table 2. Treatment plan of the experiment.
TreatmentsN (kg/ha)P2O5 (kg/ha)K2O (kg/ha)
Control (T1)---
“Ideal” (T2)225117198
Nitrogen-deficient (T3)21.3117198
Table 3. Dry mass and nutrient concentrations per dry weight for three treatments of young corn plants.
Table 3. Dry mass and nutrient concentrations per dry weight for three treatments of young corn plants.
Treatments
PropertiesControl (T1)“Ideal” (T2)N Deficient (T3)
Dry Mass (g/pot)0.867 ± 0.4162.300 ± 0.3001.800 ± 0.100
N (g/kg)10.62 ± 0.74036.73 ± 1.74910.48 ± 0.423
P (g/kg)4.671 ± 0.2064.980 ± 0.2406.434 ± 0.244
K (g/kg)19.40 ± 2.65130.23 ± 2.15131.78 ± 0.325
Ca (g/kg)14.21 ± 1.42219.04 ± 2.52614.88 ± 2.295
Mg (g/kg)4.958 ± 0.2185.000 ± 0.6362.642 ± 0.083
Table 4. Correlations between properties of young corn plant and soil.
Table 4. Correlations between properties of young corn plant and soil.
Plant
rBiomass NPKCaMg
p
SoilAL-K0.689 *0.3130.6130.888 **0.2−0.559
0.040.4120.0790.0010.6060.118
AL-P0.794 *0.3680.710 *0.940 **0.451−0.541
0.0110.330.03200.2230.133
AL-Ca0.135−0.2550.686 *0.5620.091−0.723 *
0.7290.5080.0420.1150.8170.028
AL-Mg0.005−0.0380−0.1660.3420.231
0.990.92410.670.3680.55
CaCl2
total-N
0.698 *0.934 **−0.3280.3010.874 **0.544
0.03700.3890.4320.0020.13
CaCl2
nitrate-N
0.695 *0.908 **−0.3280.3030.867 **0.545
0.0380.0010.3890.4280.0020.129
CaCl2
ammonium-N
0.716 *0.945 **−0.3020.2680.906 **0.536
0.030.0010.430.4850.0010.137
CaCl2
organic-N
0.683 *0.945 **−0.3480.3110.868 **0.542
0.04300.3590.4150.0020.132
* Significant correlation at the 0.05 level; ** Significant correlation at the 0.01 level.
Table 5. Tentative assignments of non-conjugated oligosaccharides and N-glycans detected in corn sap samples.
Table 5. Tentative assignments of non-conjugated oligosaccharides and N-glycans detected in corn sap samples.
m/zAdductGlycoform MassΔm (mDa)StructureType
365.103[M+Na]+324.106−5(Hex)2
381.077[M+K]+324.106−1(Hex)2
393.084[M+H]+374.0611(Hex)1 (Pent)1 (Phos)1
425.187[M+H]+406.15910(HexNAc)2
543.130[M+K]+486.158−1(Hex)3
607.224[M+H]+588.19010(Hex)2 (Pent)2
675.258[M+H]+656.22812(Hex)1 (HexNAc)1 (NeuAc)1
1011.185[M+Na]+970.1782(Hex)5 (Sulph)2
[M+K]+954.2024(Hex)4 (Deoxyhexose)1 (Phos)2
1569.391[M+K]+1512.418−1(Hex)1 (HexNAc)1 (Deoxyhexose)1 (NeuGc)3 (Sulph)1Paucimannose
(Hex)2 (HexNAc)1 (NeuAc)1 (NeuGc)2 (Sulph)1Paucimannose
Table 6. Tentative assignment of secondary metabolites regulated between T1 and T2 treatments.
Table 6. Tentative assignment of secondary metabolites regulated between T1 and T2 treatments.
Search MWAdductCalculated MWm (mDa)Compound NameLink
217.047H217.059−12N-pyruvoyl-glutamatehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=CPD-24913
250.101H250.08714[(methylsulfanyl)pentyl]malatehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=CPDQT-38
195.065Na195.05312dopaquinonehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=DOPAQUINONE
195.065Na195.076−11hydroxymethyl-dihydropterinhttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=AMINO-OH-HYDROXYMETHYL-DIHYDROPTERIDINE
232.150Na232.1464zealexin B1https://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=CPD-13572
402.151Na402.13120flavanone-O-glucosidehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=FLAVANONE-7-O-GLUCOSIDES
179.091K179.08110preQ1https://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=7-AMINOMETHYL-7-DEAZAGUANINE
179.091K179.07912hexosaminehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=Hexosamines
212.145K212.1414traumatinhttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=12-OXO-TRANS-10-DODECENOATE
216.176K216.1733hydroxylauratehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=CPD-12282
344.110K344.09020hydroxy-salvigeninhttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=CPD-15476
344.110K344.09020nevadensinhttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=CPD-15468
Table 7. Tentative assignment of metabolites regulated between T2 and T3 treatments.
Table 7. Tentative assignment of metabolites regulated between T2 and T3 treatments.
Search MWAdductCalculated MWm (mDa)Compound NameLink
153.017H153.0107sulfino-alaninehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=3-SULFINOALANINE
153.040H153.043−3hydroxyanthranilatehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=3-HYDROXY-ANTHRANILATE
153.040H153.043−3amino-hydroxybenzoatehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=CPD-14873
228.145H228.1369hydroxy traumatinhttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=CPD-19335
228.145H228.1369epoxy-oxododecanoatehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=CPD-25935
228.145H228.1369traumatatehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=CPD-25932
379.085H379.089−4N-methylguanosine-phosphatehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=7-METHYLGUANOSINE-5-PHOSPHATE
379.085H379.105−20S-lactoylglutathione hemithioacetalhttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=CPD-26676
379.085H379.105−20S-lactoylglutathionehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=S-LACTOYL-GLUTATHIONE
424.186H424.16917N,N’-diacetylchitobiosehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=CHITOBIOSE
114.032Na114.0320oxopent-enoatehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=OXOPENTENOATE
131.058Na131.0580glutamate-semialdehydehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=L-GLUTAMATE_GAMMA-SEMIALDEHYDE
131.058Na131.0580hydroxyprolinehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=4-HYDROXY-L-PROLINE
131.058Na131.0580aminolevulinatehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=5-AMINO-LEVULINATE
276.157Na276.159−2coumaroylagmatinehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=N-4-GUANIDINOBUTYL-4-HYDROXYCINNAMAMID
432.124Na432.10618baicalein O-glucosidehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=CPD-15176
432.124Na432.10618genistinhttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=CPD-3421
652.267Na652.273−6bis-glucosyl crocetinhttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=CPD-8667
115.061K115.063−2prolinehttps://pmn.plantcyc.org/compound?orgid=CORN&id=PRO
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dolatmoradi, M.; Sandor, Z.; Vago, I.; Balla Kovacs, A.; Laszlo, Z.; Novak, T.; Kocsis, A.I.; Vertes, A.; Kincses, I. Metabolic Profile Changes and Early Detection of Nitrogen Deficiency in Sweet Corn. Agriculture 2025, 15, 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15080856

AMA Style

Dolatmoradi M, Sandor Z, Vago I, Balla Kovacs A, Laszlo Z, Novak T, Kocsis AI, Vertes A, Kincses I. Metabolic Profile Changes and Early Detection of Nitrogen Deficiency in Sweet Corn. Agriculture. 2025; 15(8):856. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15080856

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dolatmoradi, Marjan, Zsolt Sandor, Imre Vago, Andrea Balla Kovacs, Zoltan Laszlo, Tibor Novak, Attila Istvan Kocsis, Akos Vertes, and Ida Kincses. 2025. "Metabolic Profile Changes and Early Detection of Nitrogen Deficiency in Sweet Corn" Agriculture 15, no. 8: 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15080856

APA Style

Dolatmoradi, M., Sandor, Z., Vago, I., Balla Kovacs, A., Laszlo, Z., Novak, T., Kocsis, A. I., Vertes, A., & Kincses, I. (2025). Metabolic Profile Changes and Early Detection of Nitrogen Deficiency in Sweet Corn. Agriculture, 15(8), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15080856

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop