Next Article in Journal
Design of a Trajectory Tracking Controller for Marine Vessels with Asymmetric Constraints Using a New Universal Barrier Function
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Fluid Suction Characteristics of Polyhedral Particles in Deep-Sea Hydraulic Collection Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quantitative Assessment of Typhoon Disaster Risk at County Level

1
National Disaster Reduction Center of China, Beijing 100124, China
2
School of Geographic Science, Nantong University, Nantong 226007, China
3
Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
4
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12(9), 1544; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12091544
Submission received: 12 July 2024 / Revised: 25 August 2024 / Accepted: 30 August 2024 / Published: 4 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Coastal Engineering)

Abstract

:
Using the historical disaster records of 28 typhoons in Cangnan County since 2000, combining typhoon paths and hazard-bearing bodies data and based on the theoretical framework of climate change risk, the social and economic risks of typhoon disasters in Cangnan County with four intensity levels—severe tropical storm, typhoon, severe typhoon, and super typhoon—were quantitatively assessed. The results show that with the increase in typhoon disaster intensity, the spatial pattern of typhoon disaster hazard in Cangnan County changes from high in the west and low in the east to high in the south and low in the north. Super typhoons mainly affected Mazhan town and Dailing town in the south. The vulnerability shows an obvious upward trend. Super typhoons cause more than 40% of the population to be affected, more than 20% of direct economic losses and house collapse, and nearly 30% of crops to be affected in Cangnan County. The spatial pattern of risks that typhoon disasters have on populations, economies, crops, and houses change from low in south and high in north to high in north and south, and these risks increase gradually. The comprehensive risk of typhoon disasters is higher in the north and lower in the south, with the risk level being higher in the central and northern regions.

1. Introduction

Since the 21st century, climate-related disasters worldwide have affected 6.2 billion people and resulted in 510,000 deaths, with an average annual economic loss exceeding USD 143 billion [1]. Among these, tropical cyclones are one of the most devastating extreme events, affecting an average of 20.4 million people annually and causing USD 51.5 billion of direct economic losses over the past decade [2]. China is one of the countries most impacted by tropical cyclones, with an average of 7.6 landfalls per year over the past 20 years, resulting in over 30 million people affected, nearly 190 deaths or missing persons, 4.5 million emergency relocations, the collapse of 100,000 houses, 1.9 million hectares of affected crops, and direct economic losses amounting to 46 billion yuan [3]. The track of cyclones is influenced by factors such as latitude, Coriolis force, convection, and the topography of the landfall area [4,5,6]. In the Northwest Pacific, the occurrence of cyclones has shown a lag, often forming at more northern latitudes, with landfall locations gradually shifting northward [7]. The Coriolis force determines the direction of cyclone rotation, causing it to rotate toward the poles. Under certain conditions, topography and convection can alter the local structure of tropical cyclones, leading to changes in their intensity [8]. Accurately understanding the trends and influencing factors of cyclone changes is of significant practical importance for enhancing the understanding of regional cyclones impacts and conducting impact assessments. Tropical cyclones, which occur over tropical or subtropical oceans, are essentially synonymous with the broader term “typhoons”. This paper specifically refers to tropical depressions and stronger tropical cyclones occurring over the Northwest Pacific Ocean. Quantitative assessment of the socioeconomic risks of typhoon disasters provides a scientific basis for disaster prevention and mitigation efforts to reduce the impact of typhoon disasters.
The risk of typhoon disasters has garnered widespread attention from both policymakers and the scientific community. Related research has concentrated on the observational facts and future projections of the spatiotemporal characteristics of typhoon disasters, the socioeconomic impact assessment, risk evaluation, and regional delineation [9,10,11,12]. The hazardous factors of typhoon disasters are assessed using indicators such as maximum wind speed, daily and process maximum precipitation, and typhoon paths and frequency [13,14,15]. These studies primarily focus on the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics and environmental conditions of typhoon landfalls at different spatial scales, the evolution process of typical typhoons, and influencing factors [16,17,18]. The vulnerability of typhoon-affected entities is evaluated based on an index system that includes elements such as loss conditions, exposure, sensitivity, and adaptability [19,20,21]. However, there is a paucity of vulnerability assessments reflecting the quantitative relationship between typhoon intensity and socioeconomic losses [22,23]. Consequently, typhoon disaster risk assessments often involve semi-quantitative grade evaluations that integrate the hazard levels of disaster-causing factors, the vulnerability and exposure of hazard-affected bodies [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35], indicating a lack of quantitative risk research on potential losses from typhoon disasters [9]. Additionally, research on the zoning of typhoon disaster risks has also been conducted [26].
Current research focuses on analyzing the spatiotemporal patterns of typhoon disasters [27,28]. The impact assessment of typhoon disasters is primarily derived from an evaluation system based on socioeconomic indicators, with risk levels originating from qualitative combinations of various elements [29,30]. This approach indicates the severity of typhoon impacts but fails to quantitatively express the actual losses caused by typhoons. Moreover, quantitative research on typhoon disaster risk based on historical disaster data is often conducted at regional and provincial scales, leading to high degrees of data dispersion and insufficient spatial representativeness. There is a need to focus on typical counties that are severely affected, employing precise loss and vulnerability data to estimate more accurate socioeconomic losses [31,32]. This study selects typical counties impacted by typhoons, utilizing landfall typhoon data and historical disaster records to develop a vulnerability assessment method that reflects the relationship between typhoon intensity and disaster losses. Additionally, this study establishes a quantitative risk assessment method that integrates hazard, vulnerability, and exposure. This approach aims to provide scientific support for county-level typhoon disaster risk assessment and disaster prevention and mitigation efforts.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Cangnan County, located at the southernmost tip of Zhejiang Province, falls under the jurisdiction of Wenzhou and is one of its five counties. It administers 17 towns and 2 ethnic townships (including Longgang town). The county’s name, Cangnan, is derived from its location south of Yucang Mountain. To the east and southeast, it borders the East China Sea, while to the southwest, it adjoins Fuding City in Fujian Province. To the west, it neighbors Taishun County, and to the north, it borders Pingyang and Wencheng counties (Figure 1). Geographically, Cangnan is situated at 27°30′ N latitude and 120°23′ E longitude. The county experiences a subtropical maritime monsoon climate, characterized by mild winters and cool summers, with an average annual temperature of 17.9 °C and an average annual precipitation of 1670.1 mm. Covering a total area of 1261.08 km2, it also includes a maritime area of 37,200 km2 and boasts a coastline of 155 km. Most of Cangnan falls within the Aojiang River system, with a terrain that is higher in the southwest and lower in the northeast.
Cangnan County is situated in a high-risk area for typhoon disasters [26]. From 2000 to 2018, 28 typhoon disasters were recorded in the county, including 6 severe tropical storms, 11 typhoons, 7 severe typhoons, and 4 super typhoons. Notably, the Saomai Typhoon struck Cangnan head-on in August 2006, resulting in 1,050,000 people affected, 153 deaths, direct economic losses amounting to CNY 9.124 billion, the collapse of 73,350 houses, and damage to 28,000 hectares of crops.
Cangnan County’s typhoon defense strategy is shifting from a focus on full-scale resistance and primarily defensive measures to scientific prevention. In light of the increasing intensity of typhoon disasters due to climate change and the new circumstances brought by socioeconomic development, there is a pressing need for a clear understanding of the socioeconomic impacts of typhoons to enhance disaster prevention and mitigation [33].

2.2. Data Sources

This study utilizes historical typhoon disaster data, typhoon path data, and exposure data from the following sources:
(1) Historical Typhoon Disaster Data: Collected by the Cangnan County Emergency Management Bureau, this dataset comprises records of 28 typhoon disasters. The data include typhoon names, start and end times, affected towns, affected population, death populations, missing populations, emergency relocations, the numbers of collapsed houses, the numbers of severely damaged houses, the numbers of generally damaged houses, affected crop areas, damaged crop areas, completely destroyed crop areas, direct economic losses, and agricultural direct economic losses. This dataset is primarily used to determine the socioeconomic loss rate.
(2) Typhoon Track Data: Sourced from the China Meteorological Administration’s Tropical Cyclone Data Center’s best track dataset for the Northwest Pacific tropical cyclones (https://tcdata.typhoon.org.cn/zjljsjj.html, accessed on 25 January 2024), these data include the positions and intensities of the 28 typhoons that affected Cangnan County (Figure 2). It is used to assess typhoon intensity and hazard levels.
(3) Exposure Data: Population, GDP, housing counts, and crop planting areas at the town and community (village) scale in Cangnan County from 2000 to 2018 were obtained from the Cangnan County Statistics Bureau. These data are used to determine the exposure levels during typhoon occurrences and, in conjunction with historical disaster data, to evaluate the vulnerability of the affected communities to typhoon disasters.

2.3. Typhoon Risk Quantitative Assessment Methods

Based on the risk framework of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [34], this study refers to the quantitative assessment method of climate change risk by Wu et al. [35] and defines typhoon risk R as deriving from the dynamic interaction between the hazard H caused by typhoon disasters, the exposure E of the affected socioeconomic systems, and the vulnerability V:
Rij = Hi × Ej × Vij
where Rij is the risk of typhoon disaster for typhoon of intensity level i affecting hazard-bearing body j in Cangnan County; Hi is the hazard of typhoon disaster of intensity level i; Ej is the exposure of hazard-bearing body j; and Vij is the vulnerability of hazard-bearing body j to a typhoon of intensity level i.
The classification standards for typhoon intensity levels are derived from the “Grade of Tropical Cyclones” (GB/T19201-2006) [36]. Tropical cyclones are categorized into six levels based on the maximum average wind speed near their central surface: tropical depression, tropical storm, severe tropical storm, typhoon, severe typhoon, and super typhoon. Considering that tropical depressions and tropical storms have limited impact on Cangnan County, this study focuses on the typhoon disaster risk associated with four intensity levels: severe tropical storms, typhoons, severe typhoons, and super typhoons. Vulnerability is heterogeneous and varies with the intensity of the disaster. This study uses a vulnerability curve fitting method to determine the loss rates of population, economy, housing, and crops for the four intensity levels of typhoons as vulnerability indicators.
Typhoon hazard levels are closely related to the disaster environment, such as wind speed, pressure, temperature, precipitation, atmospheric circulation, and geostrophic deflection force [37], but these factors are uncertain at the county scale, and it is difficult to quantify the degree of impact caused by each typhoon. Therefore, typhoon hazard levels are assessed using the method described by Yin et al. [9], which normalizes the frequency and path length of typhoons to represent the likelihood of occurrence and the spatial extent of impact (Figure 2). A higher frequency of typhoons in a region means that the probability of typhoons in the region is greater. The influence of a typhoon on a specific area is related to the length of its path, which can represent the spatial influence mode of a typhoon. First, the frequency of typhoon impact and path length for each community (village) are analyzed. Both indicators are normalized, and the hazard for different intensity levels of typhoons is averaged to obtain the equivalent average. The formulas are as follows:
p i = 0.1 + P i P i m i n P i m a x P i m i n × ( 0.9 0.1 )
l i = 0.1 + L i L i m i n L i m a x L i m i n × ( 0.9 0.1 )
H = p i + p i 2
where p i and l i represent the normalized indices for the frequency and path length of typhoons of intensity level i, respectively, while P i and L i represent the actual frequency and path length of typhoons of intensity level i.
Typhoon disaster vulnerability refers to the degree of damage or destruction that a typhoon disaster can cause to the hazard-bearing bodies, representing the probability of casualties or damage to socioeconomic aspects within the affected area. We reasonably hypothesize that “the higher the hazard of typhoon disasters, the greater the rate of socioeconomic losses”. By statistically analyzing the intensity of typhoon occurrences and their impact on population, economy, houses, and croplands, we express the vulnerability of the hazard-bearing bodies through the loss rate caused by the typhoon disaster. Then, we use a nonlinear regression method to establish the quantitative relationship between typhoon disasters and their corresponding loss rates, forming a vulnerability curve. This curve helps in developing loss standards for typhoon disasters of different intensities. The nonlinear regression method is chosen primarily to account for the nonlinear trend in the economic loss rate as the intensity of typhoon disasters increases. The specific process is as follows. First, the loss rates for population, GDP, houses, and crops are calculated:
v j = D j E j
where v j represents the loss rate of the hazard-bearing body j, D j represents the loss amount of the hazard-bearing body j, and E j represents the exposure of the hazard-bearing body j.
Using the four typhoon intensity levels in Cangnan County as the independent variables and the affected population rate, direct economic loss rate, affected crop rate, and house collapse rate under each intensity level as the dependent variables, various regression methods including linear model, logarithmic model, exponential model, power-law model, and hyperbolic model are employed to establish the quantitative relationship between typhoon intensity and the corresponding element loss rates, i.e., the vulnerability curves. The best model is selected based on the R2 to represent the vulnerability of Cangnan County to typhoon hazards.
R 2 = 1 i = 1 n y i y ^ i 2 i = 1 n y i y ¯ 2
At the same time, the direction of the trend is considered in order to avoid the phenomenon of overfitting, to ensure the accuracy of the predictions and the representativeness of the average impact.
Finally, the quantitative classification of typhoon risk levels—integrating hazard, vulnerability, and exposure of equal weights—employs the standard deviation method [38].

3. Results

3.1. Typhoon Hazard

The total frequency and path length of typhoons affecting Cangnan County exhibit a pattern of higher values in the west and lower values in the central and eastern regions. The typhoon hazard levels for different intensity categories, derived from these two indicators, are illustrated in Figure 3.
The hazard level for strong tropical storms decreases gradually from west to east (Figure 3a). The highest hazard level of 0.6 is found in the western part of Juxi town. The central part of Cangnan County, comprising most towns, has a hazard level of 0.5. The southeastern towns of Chixi, Mazhan, and Xiaguan exhibit moderate hazard levels. The lowest hazard levels are observed in the eastern towns of Longgang, Yanting, Jinxiang, and Dayu.
The hazard level for typhoons shows a pattern of lower levels in the central region and higher levels in the surrounding areas (Figure 3b). The highest hazard levels, approximately 0.5, are found in most areas of Longgang town in the northeast as well as in Yanting, Jinxiang, and Qianku. The western part of Juxi town and the southern towns of Yanpu and Xiaguan have moderate hazard levels. The central region of Cangnan County, encompassing most towns, has the lowest hazard level of 0.1.
The hazard level for severe typhoons is generally consistent across Cangnan County, with a hazard index of 0.5, except for the southern part of Xiaguan town, where the hazard level is lower, around 0.2 (Figure 3c).
The hazard level for super typhoons shows a pattern of higher levels in the southern part and lower levels in the northern part of Cangnan County (Figure 3d). The highest hazard levels, exceeding 0.7, are found in the eastern part of Mazhan town and the northern part of Dailing She Ethnic Township. The coastal towns in the eastern part of Cangnan also exhibit high hazard levels. The lowest hazard levels are found in Lingxi, Zaoxi, Wangli, and Yishan towns.

3.2. Typhoon Vulnerability

The analysis of socioeconomic losses caused by typhoons of different intensities, based on historical disaster data, shows that the socioeconomic losses caused by typhoons increase significantly with the intensification of typhoon strength. This trend is particularly pronounced for economic loss rates and house collapse rates, which exhibit clear nonlinear characteristics. The economic loss rate and house collapse rate for super typhoons are approximately five times and ten times higher, respectively, compared to those caused by severe typhoons. In contrast, the changes in the rates of the affected population and crop damage are more gradual.
The typhoon disaster vulnerability curves, constructed by correlating typhoon intensity with loss rates, are shown in Figure 4. Due to differing trends, the vulnerability curves for different hazard-bearing bodies vary slightly. Direct economic losses and house collapses are closely related, both exhibiting an exponential increase trend. The impact of typhoons up to severe intensity levels is relatively small, while super typhoons have a significantly greater impact. The affected population and crop damage rates show a consistent linear increase trend. The goodness of fit of the vulnerability curve for crops is relatively low, at around 0.78, while the goodness of fit for the vulnerability curves of the other hazard-bearing bodies is above 0.9.

3.3. Typhoon Risk

Figure 5 illustrates the socioeconomic risks associated with typhoons of different intensity levels, while Figure 5 shows the comprehensive socioeconomic risk levels of typhoon disasters by different intensities, combining the risks across various hazard-bearing bodies.
The impacts of severe tropical storms include approximately 51 thousand affected population, with direct economic losses estimated at approximately CNY 44 million. The affected regions are primarily concentrated in the northern regions, including Lingxi, Longgang, Yishan, and Qianku towns. Affected crop areas encompass about 2 thousand hectares, predominantly affecting Lingxi, Zaoxi, Qiaodun, and Mazhan towns in the north, while approximately 10 houses collapsed mainly in Lingxi town.
In contrast, typhoon-related impacts involve approximately 70 thousand affected population, with direct economic losses amounting to CNY 200 million. The affected crop areas span approximately 1.7 thousand hectares, with 209 houses collapsing, primarily concentrated in the northeast around Longgang town and its surrounding areas. This region exhibits a higher level of typhoon hazard, followed by Lingxi town, which has a greater exposure of hazard-bearing bodies. Overall, Cangnan County shows lower typhoon hazard values, resulting in relatively smaller differences in damage rates compared to other hazard-bearing bodies, leading to a smaller affected crop area compared to severe tropical storms.
Severe typhoons affect approximately 208 thousand population, with direct economic losses reaching CNY 922 million. Affected crop areas extend over 5.5 thousand hectares, with 729 houses collapsing. The spatial distribution pattern aligns closely with that of severe tropical storms. However, due to the significant differences in vulnerability between the two intensity levels, the losses incurred by hazard-bearing bodies are substantially higher.
Super typhoons affect around 1.3 million population, with direct economic losses totaling CNY 2.3 billion. The most affected areas include Jinxiang, Qianku, and Yanting towns in the east and Mazhan, Dailing She Ethnic Township, and Yanpu towns in the south. Affected crop areas cover approximately 3.6 thousand hectares, primarily impacting Qiaodun, Mazhan, and Jinxiang towns, while approximately 4 thousand houses collapsed, concentrated mainly in Mazhan, Jinxiang, and Yanpu towns. Super typhoons result in the highest direct economic losses and house collapses, largely influenced by vulnerabilities. However, the affected population and crop damage are not as large as those of severe typhoons, primarily due to higher exposure and hazard values in areas such as Lingxi and Zaoxi towns.
The comprehensive risk patterns of severe tropical storms, typhoons, and severe typhoons exhibit a north–high, south–low distribution, primarily influenced by the exposure of hazard-bearing bodies (Figure 6a–c). In contrast, the comprehensive risk pattern of super typhoons displays a south–high, north–low distribution, mainly influenced by the southward shift of high-hazard areas of causative factors (Figure 6d). The overall risk of typhoon disasters shows a pattern of high distribution in the north and south and low distribution in the middle, reflecting the dual impact of the spatial distribution of causative factor hazards and the exposure of hazard-bearing bodies (Figure 6e).

4. Discussion

Based on previous research, this study aims to develop a quantitative typhoon disaster risk assessment model suitable for county-level scales. The model integrates three key elements: hazard, vulnerability, and exposure, considering different disaster risk subsystems such as typhoon events, disaster-prone environments, and hazard-bearing bodies. The intention behind this model is to provide targeted recommendations for pre-disaster prevention, disaster resistance during typhoons, and post-disaster emergency decision-making in various county-level regions. An illustrative case study was conducted in Cangnan County, Zhejiang Province, which is severely affected by typhoons. This study collected comprehensive data on typhoon disasters and socioeconomic factors from 2000 to 2018 at the county level. It identified high-hazard areas for different typhoon intensities, high-sensitivity areas of disaster-prone environments, and high-risk areas of hazard-bearing bodies in Cangnan County, yielding scientifically reasonable analysis results. Vulnerability quantified in this study can be linked to disaster-causing factors and disaster-bearing bodies, and the results of the risk assessment can provide guidance specific to each risk element for disaster prevention. This model can fill the gap of quantitative risk assessment at the county scale and provide reference for the change in natural disaster risk assessment from qualitative to quantitative [39,40].
Compared to the qualitative methods used for assessing typhoon risk, the quantitative assessment method used in Cangnan County similarly concludes that the risk level is a high level. However, its advantage lies in its ability to clearly quantify the socioeconomic losses caused by typhoons of different intensity levels [41]. Compared with standards for typhoon intensity and potential disaster losses in China, Cangnan County has higher rates of population, economic, and housing damage than the national average for the same typhoon intensity levels [22,42,43]. In the typhoon disaster risk assessment for the Yangtze River Delta, the Zhejiang Province has a high frequency of typhoon impacts and a high typhoon disaster risk level [24,44]. Within Zhejiang Province, Cangnan County is identified as being in the highest risk category in county-level assessments [26]. In grid-scale risk assessments, Cangnan County also ranks high in risk level, with a risk pattern consistent with that observed in this study [45]. From the above studies, it can be seen that typhoon disasters occur frequently in Cangnan County, the exposure is relatively concentrated, and the disaster prevention and reduction measures are relatively underdeveloped, resulting in a high-risk level. This reflects the relatively concentrated exposure and the relatively underdeveloped disaster prevention and mitigation measures in the area. At the national and regional scales, Cangnan County is in a high-risk region, necessitating the development of targeted disaster mitigation plans.
By integrating hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, this method provides a comprehensive risk assessment of typhoons in Cangnan County over the past 20 years. The analysis highlights the differential impacts of typhoons of varying intensities on the socioeconomic structure of Cangnan County, primarily reflected in the changes in risk values and spatial distribution. Understanding the evolution trends of these risk patterns and the varying contributions of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability allows for the development of targeted strategies to mitigate the socioeconomic impacts of typhoon disasters [46]. The results emphasize the importance of focusing on high-risk areas and the need for precise assessment of vulnerability and exposure to improve disaster preparedness and response [47,48,49]. At the same time, the risk assessment model developed in this study can be applied to individual typhoon events or a specific disaster-bearing body or even the disaster chain caused by the typhoon disaster, and the dynamic risk assessment can be carried out according to the real-time path of a typhoon if the data are sufficient to support it [41,50,51,52].
By analyzing the spatial distribution of typhoon disasters, this study provides important references for monitoring, early warnings, and disaster prevention of typhoon disasters in Cangnan County. Understanding the areas with the highest hazards, particularly for higher-intensity typhoon disasters, can guide management departments in the rational allocation of disaster prevention and mitigation resources and efforts, effectively protecting communities in high-hazard areas [53]. From the typhoon paths shown in Figure 2, it can be observed that the paths of severe tropical storms, typhoons, and severe typhoons exhibit a high degree of spatial consistency, resulting in relatively small differences in hazard levels within the county. However, the paths of super typhoons tend to be more southern and western, leading to a pronounced spatial heterogeneity with higher hazard levels in the south and lower levels in the north [54,55]. Meanwhile, it is necessary to pay attention to the changes in the temporal and spatial characteristics of typhoon landfall and the possible scenarios of the increase in the number of typhoons, especially typhoons of stronger grades, under the background of future climate change, which will lead to higher socioeconomic risks [56,57].
The vulnerability curves for direct economic losses and house collapses in Cangnan County show exponential growth, with super typhoons causing disproportionately higher losses. The vulnerability curves for affected populations and crop areas follow linear trends, but the fit for crop vulnerability is slightly lower compared to other factors. These vulnerability curves help quantify the relationship between typhoon intensity and the resulting damage, providing a foundation for risk assessment and the formulation of mitigation strategies under different scenarios, which is crucial for enhancing Cangnan County’s resilience to future typhoon impacts. It should be noted that the vulnerability curve represents the average impact of typhoons on Cangnan County as a whole. Towns and communities (villages) within the county can further collect data to analyze the corresponding relationship between vulnerability and the amount of disaster prevention and reduction material reserves and reduce vulnerability levels by increasing disaster prevention and reduction measures [58,59].
Socioeconomic development and the continuous implementation of disaster prevention and mitigation measures, the region’s disaster mitigation capacity has improved to some extent. However, there are significant shortcomings in the region’s capacity to prevent major catastrophes, as evidenced by the vulnerability curves for Cangnan County’s economy and houses. To address this, it is necessary to improve precise early predictions and quantitative assessments for major disasters and to establish an integrated theoretical and technical system for major-disaster risk management and a resilient society, combining natural sciences, engineering technology, and the social sciences [60].
Current typhoon disaster risk assessments at different temporal and spatial scales are still evolving and improving, and this study has some limitations. On one hand, obtaining natural and socioeconomic data remains challenging. Affected by the distribution of meteorological stations, the typhoon track method is adopted to carry out hazard assessments. This method is feasible, but the result may be different from that of precipitation and wind speed. Data are missing on factors that have a significant impact on typhoon risk, such as infrastructure quality, governance, and community preparedness. Future research needs to address the issue of using multi-source data and machine learning methods for quantitative risk assessments, while exploring long-term trends in typhoon risk in the context of climate change. Due to limited access to historical disaster data, this study has only analyzed the characteristics of typhoon disasters in the past 20 years, and further research is needed on the impact of long-term trends in the context of climate change. On the other hand, typhoon disaster risk is closely related to the comprehensive disaster reduction capacity at the regional scale, which is mainly determined by various social statistical indicators and defensive engineering. Future research should further quantify the impact of comprehensive disaster reduction capacity on typhoon disaster risk, establish a quantitative relationship model between vulnerability and disaster reduction capability based on vulnerability curve and index evaluation, clarify disaster prevention and reduction objectives and construction paths, and provide more targeted guidance for typhoon disaster prevention.

5. Conclusions

Based on data from 28 typhoon disaster events in Cangnan County since 2000, this study utilized regression analysis to quantify the socioeconomic vulnerabilities to severe tropical storms, typhoons, severe typhoons, and super typhoons. A county-level quantitative assessment model for typhoon disaster risk was constructed, integrating analyses risks of hazard-bearing bodies, i.e., population, economy, crops, houses, and socioeconomic comprehensive risk. This study concludes with the following findings.
(1) The hazard levels of typhoon disasters in Cangnan County exhibits a transition from a pattern of higher levels in the west and lower levels in the east with increasing intensity to a pattern of higher levels in the south and lower levels in the north. Western areas face higher hazard levels from severe tropical storms, northeastern regions from typhoons, county-wide from severe typhoons, and southern areas from super typhoons.
(2) Socioeconomic losses caused by typhoon disasters of different intensity levels show an increasing trend. Direct economic losses and housing collapses increase exponentially, while affected populations and crop areas increase linearly. A super typhoon could potentially affect over 40% of the population, cause over 20% of direct economic losses and housing collapses, and affect nearly 30% of crop areas of Cangnan County.
(3) From the perspective of the township scale, risks gradually escalate as the intensity of typhoon disasters increases. Super typhoons result in the highest direct economic losses and housing collapses due to vulnerabilities. Severe typhoons lead to the highest numbers of the affected population and crop areas influenced by both hazard and exposure levels.
(4) Under the same intensity of typhoon disasters, the exposure of hazard-bearing bodies determines the level of risk. Townships like Lingxi, Zaoxi, and Longgang, with dense populations and relatively developed economies, face comparatively higher risks.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.G.; methodology, G.G. and J.Y.; validation, J.Y. and L.L.; formal analysis, G.G. and J.Y.; data curation, G.G.; writing—original draft, G.G. and S.W.; writing—review and editing, J.Y. and L.L.; visualization, G.G. and J.Y.; supervision, S.W.; project administration, S.W.; funding acquisition, G.G., L.L. and S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42271089, 42101311, and 42371084).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Newman, R.; Noy, I. The global costs of extreme weather that are attributable to climate change. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 6103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Krichene, H.; Vogt, T.; Piontek, F.; Geiger, T.; Schötz, C.; Otto, C. The social costs of tropical cyclones. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 7294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China. China Flood and Drought Disaster Prevention Bulletin 2022; China Water & Power Press: Beijing, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kuo, H.C.; Williams, R.T.; Chen, J.H.; Chen, Y.L. Topographic effects on barotropic vortex motion: No mean flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 2001, 58, 1310–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, C.S.; Liu, Y.C.; Chien, F.C. The secondary low and heavy rainfall associated with Typhoon Mindulle (2004). Mon. Weather. Rev. 2008, 136, 1260–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rostami, M.; Zeitlin, V. Evolution, propagation and interactions with topography of hurricane-like vortices in a moist-convective rotating shallow-water model. J. Fluid Mech. 2020, 902, A24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cha, Y.; Choi, J.W.; Ahn, J.B. Interdecadal changes in the genesis activity of the first tropical cyclones over the western North Pacific from 1979 to 2016. Clim. Dyn. 2023, 60, 1885–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, L.; Meng, Z. An overview on tropical cyclone research progress in China during the past ten years. Chin. J. Atmos. Sci. 2001, 25, 420–432. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yin, J.; Dai, E.; Wu, S. Integrated Risk Assessment and Zoning of Typhoon Disasters in China. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2013, 33, 1370–1376. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gao, G.; Huang, D.; Zhao, S. Annual and Monthly Risk Assessment of Typhoon Disasters in China Based on the Information Diffusion Method. Meteorol. Mon. 2019, 45, 1600–1610. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bloemendaal, N.; de Moel, H.; Martinez, A.B.; Muis, S.; Haigh, I.D.; van der Wiel, K.; Aerts, J.C. A globally consistent local-scale assessment of future tropical cyclone risk. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabm8438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, Z.; Xu, L.; Lu, Q. Comprehensive typhoon hazard zoning in China based on historical records. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 2024, 15, 2300813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, L.; Zhou, Y.; Lei, X.; Zhou, Y.; Bi, H.; Mao, X.Z. Predominant factors of disaster caused by tropical cyclones in South China coast and implications for early warning systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 726, 138556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ye, J.; Lin, G.; Zhang, M.; Gao, L. Hazard analysis of typhoon disaster-causing factors based on different landing paths: A case study of Fujian Province, China. Nat. Hazards 2020, 100, 811–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tang, J.; Hu, F.; Liu, Y.; Wang, W.; Yang, S. High-Resolution Hazard Assessment for Tropical Cyclone-Induced Wind and Precipitation: An Analytical Framework and Application. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fang, W.; Lin, W. A review on typhoon wind field modeling for disaster risk assessment. Prog. Geogr. 2013, 32, 852–867. [Google Scholar]
  17. Yue, C.; Han, Z.; Gu, W.; Tang, Y.; Tan, J. Study on the cause of torrential rainfall and its asymmetric structure from typhoon Haitang (2005). Torrential Rain Disasters 2017, 36, 293–300. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhou, Y.; Wu, T. Composite analysis of precipitation intensity and distribution characteristics of western track landfall typhoons over China under strong and weak monsoon conditions. Atmos. Res. 2019, 225, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, W.K.; Wang, J.J. Typhoon damage assessment model and analysis in Taiwan. Nat. Hazards 2015, 79, 497–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mo, J.; Huang, S.; Zhong, S.; Chen, Y. GIS-based elaborate evaluation of typhoon disaster vulnerability for the hazard bearing bodies in Guangxi. Torrential Rain Disasters 2017, 36, 177–181. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, Y.; Wu, J.; Tang, R.; Wu, K.; Nie, J.; Shi, P.; Li, N.; Liu, L. Vulnerability to typhoons: A comparison of consequence and driving factors between Typhoon Hato (2017) and Typhoon Mangkhut (2018). Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 838, 156476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yin, J.; Dai, E.; Wu, S.; Pan, T. A study on the relationship between typhoon intensity grade and disaster loss in China. Geogr. Res. 2013, 32, 266–274. [Google Scholar]
  23. Guo, G.; Zhao, F.; Wang, D. A Method Research of House Damage in Typhoon-Flood Disaster Chian Based on Vulnerability Curve. J. Catastrophol. 2017, 32, 94–97. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, Y.; Fan, G.; He, Y.; Cao, L. Risk assessment of typhoon disaster for the Yangtze River Delta of China. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 2017, 8, 1580–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pan, J.; Xu, Q.; Liu, H. Risk Assessment of Typhoon Disaster in South China Based on Optimal Combination Weights of AHP-anti-entropy-TOPSIS. J. Nanning Teach. Educ. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2021, 38, 60–67. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lu, Y.; Ren, F.; Zhu, W. Risk zoning of typhoon disasters in Zhejiang Province, China. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. 2018, 18, 2921–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, F.; Jia, H.; Du, E.; Wang, L.; Wang, N.; Yang, A. Spatiotemporal variations and risk analysis of Chinese typhoon disasters. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, Q.; Wang, X.; Fang, Y.; Ning, Y.; Yuan, P.; Xi, B.; Wang, R. Comprehensive investigation on spatiotemporal variations of tropical cyclone activities in the Western North Pacific, 1950–2019. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qi, P.; Du, M. Multi-factor evaluation indicator method for the risk assessment of atmospheric and oceanic hazard group due to the attack of tropical cyclones. Inter. J. Appl. Earth Obs. 2018, 68, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, W.; Yi, D.; Yin, Y.; Zhen, D. Analysis of Temporal-Spatial Patterns and Impact Factors of Typhoon Disaster Losses in China from 1978 to 2020. Trop. Geogr. 2024, 44, 1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, G.; Yang, B.; Nong, X.; Kou, Y.; Wu, F.; Zhao, D.; Yu, P. Risk Level Assessment of Typhoon Hazard Based on Loss Utility. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ning, Y.; Wang, X.; Yu, Q.; Liang, D.; Zhai, J. Rapid Damage Prediction and Risk Assessment for Tropical Cyclones at a Fine Grid in Guangdong Province, South China. Inter. J. Disast. Risk. Sc. 2023, 14, 237–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhu, S.; Dong, D. Typhoon disaster and its defense in Cangnan County, Zhejiang Province. China Flood Drought Manag. 2014, 24, 68–70. [Google Scholar]
  34. IPCC. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report; Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wu, S.; Gao, J.; Deng, H.; Liu, L.; Pan, T. Climate change risk and methodology for its quantitative assessment. Prog. Geogr. 2018, 37, 28–35. [Google Scholar]
  36. GB/T 19201-2006; General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, Standardization Administration. Grade of Tropical Cyclones. China Standard Press: Beijing, China, 2006.
  37. Hung, C.; Shih, M.F.; Lin, T.Y. The climatological analysis of typhoon tracks, steering flow, and the pacific subtropical high in the vicinity of Taiwan and the Western North Pacific. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gao, J.; Liu, L.; Wu, S. Hazards of extreme events in China under different global warming targets. Big Earth Data 2020, 4, 153–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gallina, V.; Torresan, S.; Critto, A.; Sperotto, A.; Glade, T.; Marcomini, A. A review of multi-risk methodologies for natural hazards: Consequences and challenges for a climate change impact assessment. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 168, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cui, P.; Peng, J.; Shi, P.; Tang, H.; Ouyang, C.; Zou, Q.; Liu, L.; Li, C.; Lei, Y. Scientific challenges of research on natural hazards and disaster risk. Geogr. Sustain. 2021, 2, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, B.; Zhao, F.; Wang, X.; Yan, X.; Lin, S. Multi-Source Data-Driven Modeling of Typhoon Dynamic Risk Assessment. Trop. Geogr. 2024, 44, 1102–1112. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhu, J.; Lu, Y.; Ren, F.; McBride, J.L.; Ye, L. Typhoon disaster risk zoning for China’s coastal area. Front. Earth Sci. 2022, 16, 291–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, Z.; Xia, N.; Zhao, X.; Ji, X.; Wang, J. Comprehensive risk assessment of typhoon disasters in China’s coastal areas based on multi-source geographic big data. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 926, 171815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, W.; Xu, W.; Shi, P. Risk assessment of typhoon disaster at county level in the Yangtze River Delta of China. J. Nat. Disasters 2011, 20, 77–83. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang, M.; Han, Z.; Jin, Y. Risk Assessment of Typhoon Disaster in Zhejiang Province. Sci. Technol. Eng. 2014, 14, 123–129. [Google Scholar]
  46. IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; Contribution of Working Groups II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  47. Menoni, S.; Molinari, D.; Parker, D.; Ballio, F.; Tapsell, S. Assessing multifaceted vulnerability and resilience in order to design risk-mitigation strategies. Nat. Hazards 2012, 64, 2057–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Du, Y.; Ding, Y.; Li, Z.; Cao, G. The role of hazard vulnerability assessments in disaster preparedness and prevention in China. Mil. Med. Res. 2015, 2, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, L.; Cao, C.; Wu, D.; Qiu, H.; Lu, M.; Liu, L. Study on typhoon disaster loss and risk prediction and benefit assessment of disaster prevention and mitigation. Trop. Cyclone Res. Rev. 2018, 7, 237–246. [Google Scholar]
  50. Hong, K.; Ji, M. Risk assessment of typhoon disasters in nansha port area based on different probabilities. J. Trop. Meteorol. 2019, 35, 604–613. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang, J.; Chen, Y. Risk assessment of flood disaster induced by typhoon rainstorms in Guangdong province, China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, Y.; Yin, Y.; Song, L. Risk assessment of typhoon disaster chains in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macau greater bay area, China. Front. Earth Sci. 2022, 10, 839733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hoque, M.A.A.; Phinn, S.; Roelfsema, C.; Childs, I. Tropical cyclone disaster management using remote sensing and spatial analysis: A review. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2017, 22, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lu, Y.; Zhao, H.; Zhao, D.; Li, Q. Spatial-temporal characteristic of tropical cyclone disasters in China during 1984−2017. Haiyang Xuebao 2021, 43, 45–61. [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhao, S.; Li, Y.; Zhao, D.; Zhou, X.; Ai, W. Spatio-temporal characteristics of tropical cyclone disaster on monthly scale over China during 2001–2020. Clim. Chang. Res. 2023, 19, 592–604. [Google Scholar]
  56. Nie, X.; Tan, H.; Cai, R.; Gao, X. Projection of the tropical cyclones landing in China in the future based on regional climate model. Adv. Clim. Chang. Res. 2023, 19, 23. [Google Scholar]
  57. Li, Z.; Qiu, L.; Wang, W.; He, B.; Wu, S.; He, S. Spacio-Temporal Variation Characteristics of Northward-Moving Typhoon and Their Relationship with ENSO. Trop. Geogr. 2024, 44, 973–986. [Google Scholar]
  58. Chen, L.; Liu, Y.; Chan, K. Integrated community-based disaster management program in Taiwan: A case study of Shang-An village. Nat. Hazards 2006, 37, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fan, M. Disaster governance and community resilience: Reflections on Typhoon Morakot in Taiwan. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2015, 58, 24–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cui, P.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Ge, Y. How to Scientifically Prevent, Manage and Prewarn Catastrophic Risk? Earth Sci. 2022, 47, 3897–3899. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Geographical location and administrative division of Cangnan County.
Figure 1. Geographical location and administrative division of Cangnan County.
Jmse 12 01544 g001
Figure 2. Typhoon track and intensity level affecting Cangnan County.
Figure 2. Typhoon track and intensity level affecting Cangnan County.
Jmse 12 01544 g002
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of hazard levels of severe tropical storms (a), typhoons (b), severe typhoons (c), and super typhoons (d) in Cangnan County.
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of hazard levels of severe tropical storms (a), typhoons (b), severe typhoons (c), and super typhoons (d) in Cangnan County.
Jmse 12 01544 g003
Figure 4. Vulnerability curve of typhoon disaster in Cangnan County.
Figure 4. Vulnerability curve of typhoon disaster in Cangnan County.
Jmse 12 01544 g004
Figure 5. Socioeconomic risk of typhoon disasters in Cangnan County.
Figure 5. Socioeconomic risk of typhoon disasters in Cangnan County.
Jmse 12 01544 g005
Figure 6. Spatial pattern of comprehensive risk of severe tropical storms (a), typhoons (b), severe typhoons (c), super typhoons (d) and typhoon disasters (e) in Cangnan County.
Figure 6. Spatial pattern of comprehensive risk of severe tropical storms (a), typhoons (b), severe typhoons (c), super typhoons (d) and typhoon disasters (e) in Cangnan County.
Jmse 12 01544 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, G.; Yin, J.; Liu, L.; Wu, S. Quantitative Assessment of Typhoon Disaster Risk at County Level. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 1544. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12091544

AMA Style

Guo G, Yin J, Liu L, Wu S. Quantitative Assessment of Typhoon Disaster Risk at County Level. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2024; 12(9):1544. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12091544

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Guizhen, Jie Yin, Lulu Liu, and Shaohong Wu. 2024. "Quantitative Assessment of Typhoon Disaster Risk at County Level" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 12, no. 9: 1544. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12091544

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop