Next Article in Journal
Ocean Currents Velocity Hindcast and Forecast Bias Correction Using a Deep-Learning Approach
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of the Atlantic Water Boundary Current on the Phytoplankton Composition and Biomass in the Northern Barents Sea and the Adjacent Nansen Basin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Uncertainty Assessment of the Remaining Volume of an Offshore Gravity Fish Cage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Offshore Aquaculture and Renewable Energy Production

by
Huu Phu Nguyen
1,2,3,* and
Chien Ming Wang
1,2
1
School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
2
Blue Economy Cooperative Research Centre, Launceston, TAS 7248, Australia
3
Laboratory for Computational Civil Engineering, Institute for Computational Science and Artificial Intelligence, Van Lang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12(9), 1679; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12091679
Submission received: 15 August 2024 / Accepted: 11 September 2024 / Published: 20 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Offshore Aquaculture and Renewable Energy Production)
With the world population projected to reach 10 billion by 2050, the demand for food and energy is expected to increase significantly. There is a clear need to increase food production and renewable energy generation in a sustainable manner. Offshore aquaculture and renewable energy production have emerged as pivotal solutions for this pressing need, offering vast ocean space and abundant energy resources. The closing remarks of this Editorial delve into the advances, opportunities, and potential challenges inherent in the development of offshore aquaculture and renewable energy production.
Offshore aquaculture involves the cultivation of marine organisms (fish, crustaceans, mollusks, and aquatic plants) in the open ocean, away from traditional coastal farming regions. This new farming approach offers ample farming space with less competition from other coastal developments, including shipping, tourism, recreation, and conservation. Additionally, these exposed locations provide improved water quality and lower temperatures, crucial for producing quality seafood such as fish. The strong waves and currents in these locations help disperse waste, reduce biofouling, and prevent degradation of the marine ecosystem often associated with nearshore intensive aquaculture farms.
Traditional nearshore fish farming relies heavily on floating open net systems, with floaters constructed from HDPE (high-density polyethylene) pipes or galvanized steel frames supported by plastic buoyant boxes. Such infrastructure systems have been used in wave heights of up to 3 m [1]. However, modifications and innovations in infrastructure are needed for offshore fish farming in higher-energy sea states. Efforts are being invested in three approaches for offshore fish farming infrastructure. The first approach is to modify nearshore fish pens to increase their strength, stiffness and stability to survive offshore sea conditions, although the floating HDPE collars and nets tend to deform significantly. The second approach is to submerge fish pens below the water surface to avoid strong surface waves, especially during storms. Studies and trials are currently examining structural performance, submergence techniques, and fish health in submerged states [2]. The third approach for farming fish offshore is to employ large, stiff frame structures constructed from steel pipes or bundles of HDPE pipes from Contribution 1. This approach appears to be the most adopted method offshore due to the robustness of the structure in harsh offshore environments, although high infrastructure costs remain an issue for adoption on a large scale.
Apart from fish farming, seaweed cultivation is receiving more attention due to the wide applications of seaweed, such as in Asian cuisines, animal feed, cosmetics, pharmaceutical products, and fertilizers [3]. Seaweed farming infrastructure in nearshore sites is commonly seen as low-tech, consisting of nets, ropes, wooden piles, bamboo frames, buoys, and seabed anchors. Offshore, efforts are made to examine more robust farming infrastructures constructed from HDPE or even steel [4]. Optimizing seaweed farming infrastructure and co-locating with offshore fish farms are receiving attention as cost-reduction approaches. Furthermore, co-locating with fish farms may improve the sustainability of aquaculture, as seaweed can absorb phosphorus and nitrogen from fish waste [3].
Alongside offshore aquaculture, there has been significant interest, research, and development in harnessing offshore renewable energy sources, such as wind, solar, wave, and tidal currents. Currently, offshore wind energy is the primary contributor to offshore renewable energy production, with a global cumulative installed capacity of 64.3 GW as of 2022 [5]. Globally, there is a strong commitment to further expand offshore energy production. For instance, the European Union has set a target for 2050, aiming for 350 GW from offshore wind and 188 GW from wave and tidal energies [6]. However, offshore renewables face challenges due to the relatively new nature of the technologies involved and the harsh offshore environments in which they operate. The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) generated from offshore renewable sources remains relatively high. Significant investment, research, and development efforts are underway to further reduce LCOEs.
Offshore wind energy has experienced rapid growth in recent decades, with a remarkable increase in cumulative installed capacity of over 700 times from 2006 to 2022 [5]. The technologies associated with offshore wind are relatively mature and have been commercialized on a large scale, especially for bottom-founded wind turbines that are supported by monopile, tripod, or jacket structures. These technologies can be economically viable for waters up to 60 m in depth. For greater water depths, floating wind turbines are being developed for deployment; they are in the early phases of development, with minimal deployments and operations. Floating wind turbines consist of a floater and upper turbines. Since the turbine design is rather standard, the focus is on the floater. As water depth increases, floaters can take the form of a barge, semi-submersible, spar, or tension leg platform [7]. Efforts are being made to conduct more refined analyses and structural optimizations of floaters and their mooring systems to enhance safety and reduce costs [8].
Floating solar installations have been observed in calm waters such as lakes and reservoirs, but there is also interest in harnessing solar energy from the ocean, where solar infrastructure must withstand strong waves and water currents. Two approaches have been proposed thus far. One uses a robust semi-submersible frame to support PV panels such as SolarDuck [9], while the other uses a large membrane held by HDPE structures, allowing the structure to flexibly deform with waves such as Ocean Sun [10]. Offshore solar research has been limited, and further research is needed to examine the safety of the infrastructure under storm conditions [11].
Harnessing wave motions to generate electricity has been of interest since the 1970s, but technologies for wave energy conversion have yet to converge [12]. While some have demonstrated the ability to deliver electricity in trial deployments, issues such as safety, durability of structures, and cost of generated electricity remain challenging. Designs of wave energy converters vary; common types include oscillating water columns, attenuators, point absorbers, and oscillating wave surge converters. Recent research has focused on integrating wave energy converters with other marine structures and developing new generations of power take-off systems to reduce the cost of electricity generated from waves.
Tidal currents offer another form of offshore renewable energy, which can be converted into electricity using horizontal axis turbines or kite devices. The horizontal axis turbines, similar to but smaller than wind turbines, are the most common design. An example of this design is the MeyGen tidal device [13]. Current research and development in this common design concept show promise for further cost reductions and improved safety, indicating the potential for the widespread expansion of tidal current energy [14].
Another advancement in offshore aquaculture farms and renewable energy production farms is to integrate or co-locate these two kinds of farms which present compelling synergies and opportunities for sustainable ocean development [15,16]. By co-locating aquaculture facilities within offshore wind farms, stakeholders can capitalize on shared infrastructure, mooring systems and resources, optimizing spatial utilization and reducing environmental footprints. Offshore wind farms provide stable platforms for anchoring aquaculture infrastructure, while utilizing excess space between wind turbines for aquaculture activities. Moreover, the presence of wind or marine energy infrastructure can mitigate energy costs for aquaculture operations, fostering economic viability and long-term sustainability by eliminating the use of fossil fuels in marine aquaculture.
Despite the promising synergies between offshore aquaculture and renewable energy production, several challenges and considerations must be addressed to realize their full potential. These include regulatory frameworks, environmental impact assessments, technological compatibility, and stakeholder engagement. Regulatory frameworks governing offshore activities must be adapted to accommodate integrated aquaculture–energy projects, ensuring compliance with environmental standards, and permitting requirements. Environmental impact assessments are essential to evaluate the ecological implications of co-located operations and the effects on marine ecosystems. Moreover, technological compatibility between aquaculture and renewable energy infrastructure is crucial to optimize resource utilization and mitigate operational risks. Innovative solutions, such as multi-use platforms and modular systems, can facilitate synergistic deployment while addressing technical constraints and operational challenges. Furthermore, meaningful stakeholder engagement is paramount to foster collaboration and address concerns among diverse stakeholders, including government agencies, industry partners, local communities, and environmental organizations. Transparent communication, stakeholder consultation, and participatory decision-making processes are essential to build trust and consensus around integrated aquaculture–energy projects.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, H.P.N.; writing—review and editing, C.M.W.; funding acquisition, C.M.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Blue Economy Cooperative Research Centre, established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Program, grant number CRC-20180101.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

List of Contributions

  • Wang, C.-M.; Chu, Y.-I.; Baumeister, J.; Zhang, H.; Qiao, Y.-P.; Karampour, H.; Jeng, D.-S.; Savage, L. SeaFisher—A Submersible High-Density Polyethylene Offshore Fish Pen. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 1795. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11091795.
  • Chu, Y.-I.; Wang, C.-M.; Zhang, H.; Abdussamie, N.; Karampour, H.; Jeng, D.-S.; Baumeister, J.; Aland, P.A. Offshore Fish Farms: A Review of Standards and Guidelines for Design and Analysis. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 762. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11040762.
  • Wang, G.; Cui, Y.; Guan, C.; Gong, P.; Wan, R. Effects of Inclination Angles on the Hydrodynamics of Knotless Net Panels in Currents. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 1148. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11061148.
  • Grasberger, J.; Forbush, D. Investigating a Renewable-Resource-Targeting Mobile Aquaculture System Using Route Optimization Based on Optimal Foraging Theory. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 2123. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11112123.
  • Nguyen, H.P.; Wang, C.M.; von Herzen, B.; Huang, C. Hydroelastic Responses of a Submersible Ring Structure for Offshore Seaweed Cultivation under Wave Action. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 2238. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11122238.
  • Liu, Z.; Guedes Soares, C. Uncertainty Assessment of the Remaining Volume of an Offshore Gravity Fish Cage. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12020289.

References

  1. Lader, P.; Kristiansen, D.; Alver, M.; Bjelland, H.V.; Myrhaug, D. Classification of Aquaculture Locations in Norway with Respect to Wind Wave Exposure. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering—OMAE, Trondheim, Norway, 25–30 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. Olafsen, T. Fish in Atlantis: A Potential Game Changer for Aquaculture. Available online: https://blog.akvagroup.com/blog/fish-in-atlantis-a-potential-game-changer-for-aquaculture (accessed on 5 February 2023).
  3. FAO. Seaweeds and Microalgae: An Overview for Unlocking Their Potential in Global Aquaculture Development; FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1229; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bak, U.G.; Gregersen, Ó.; Infante, J. Technical Challenges for Offshore Cultivation of Kelp Species: Lessons Learned and Future Directions. Bot. Mar. 2020, 63, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. GWEC. Global Offshore Wind Report; Global Wind Energy Council: Brussels, Belgium, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  6. European Commission. ORECCA European Offshore Renewable Energy Roadmap; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhou, B.; Zhang, Z.; Li, G.; Yang, D.; Santos, M. Review of Key Technologies for Offshore Floating Wind Power Generation. Energies 2023, 16, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, J.; Kim, M.H. Review of Recent Offshore Wind Turbine Research and Optimization Methodologies in Their Design. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. SolarDuck. Available online: https://solarduck.tech/about/ (accessed on 7 February 2023).
  10. Ocean Sun. Available online: https://oceansun.no/ (accessed on 7 February 2023).
  11. Aksnes, V.; Alsos, H.; Bachynski-Polic, E.; Berthelsen, P.A.; Delhaye, V.; Furevik, B.R.; Jostad, H.P.; Kristiansen, T.; Ommani, B. On common research needs for the next generation of floating support structures. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering—OMAE, Hamburg, Germany, 5–10 June 2022. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, C.M.; Nguyen, H.P. Advances in Research and Developments on Offshore Aquaculture and Renewable Energy Production. In Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2024; Volume 442, pp. 3–22. [Google Scholar]
  13. IRENA. Innovation Outlook: Ocean Energy Technologies; International Renewable Energy Agency: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  14. IRENA. Tidal Energy Technology Brief; International Renewable Energy Agency: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bonsu, P.O.; Letschert, J.; Yates, K.L.; Svendsen, J.C.; Berkenhagen, J.; Rozemeijer, M.J.C.; Kerkhove, T.R.H.; Rehren, J.; Stelzenmüller, V. Co-Location of Fisheries and Offshore Wind Farms: Current Practices and Enabling Conditions in the North Sea. Mar. Policy 2024, 159, 105941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Holm, P.; Buck, B.H.; Langan, R. Introduction: New Approaches to Sustainable Offshore Food Production and the Development of Offshore Platforms; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nguyen, H.P.; Wang, C.M. Advances in Offshore Aquaculture and Renewable Energy Production. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12091679

AMA Style

Nguyen HP, Wang CM. Advances in Offshore Aquaculture and Renewable Energy Production. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2024; 12(9):1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12091679

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nguyen, Huu Phu, and Chien Ming Wang. 2024. "Advances in Offshore Aquaculture and Renewable Energy Production" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 12, no. 9: 1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12091679

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop