Next Article in Journal
Politics and Theology in the Historical Works of Yitzhak Baer
Next Article in Special Issue
Theological Valorization of the Other from an Orthodox Christian Perspective: Dorin Oancea’s Model of Theology of Religions in Relation to Social and Theological Developments of Modernity
Previous Article in Journal
Muslim-Jewish Harmony: A Politically-Contingent Reality
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Neomythology: A New Religious Mythology

Religions 2022, 13(6), 536; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13060536
by Ioannis Xidakis
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Religions 2022, 13(6), 536; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13060536
Submission received: 17 April 2022 / Revised: 28 May 2022 / Accepted: 7 June 2022 / Published: 11 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion and Change)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is an interesting and insightful article. I would recommend minor changes to give a stronger sense of introduction (I think the reader is thrust into a discussion of myth before we get an understanding of what the article sets out to achieve). The conceptual links across different sci-fi texts could perhaps be highlighted in a more systematic way so that it doesn't risk coming across as a meandering description of different films and video games - I don't think it quite comes across as this, but I would certainly recommend tightening the discussion to bring forth the argument more. The link between secularisation of the divine and objectification of the divine (470-482) I found particularly interesting, but the ways that the latter follows on from the former are not fully explicated and thus the link is unclear. It also does not appear in the conclusion, so I wonder about its relevance to the discussion and overarching argument? The only other fairly minor comment was about the gendered language to refer to 'man' - it strikes me as unnecessary and not serving the analysis in any way.

Author Response

I am forwarding a file with the changes that have been made to the article based on your comments.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The research is very interesting and starts very well with the clarification of the theoretical bases of the work. However, when you get to section 4, dedicated to the distinctive characteristics of neomythology, I think you should clarify in the title of that section in the cinema, the comics... On the other hand, this section, which precedes the conclusions, is messy and should be structured by the five motifs that appear in the conclusion. In this way, said conclusion would be related to the analysis of the selected works. On the other hand, the research does not delimit the scope of neomythology in the field of media such as cinema, comics, etc. and in everyday reality. Rather, the author hindered the collective imaginary that these means of expression build. Finally, it would not hurt if the author reflected on the role played by the products of popular culture in the recreation and production of myths.

Author Response

I am forwarding a file with the changes that have been made to the article based on your comments.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The author has made the indicated changes. Now his work is ready to be published

Back to TopTop