1. Introduction
The Italian poet Dante Alighieri’s
Divina Commedia (
Divine Comedy, c. 1307–1321), written during his exile beginning around 1308, is widely recognized as one of the greatest achievements in world literature. This monumental poem creates a profound and enduring symbolic universe rooted in Christian theology. Through its three-part structure—
Inferno,
Purgatorio, and
Paradiso—it presents a theological worldview intertwined with late medieval eschatology and moral order (
Barnes 2011, pp. 1–15).
The concept of Hell is a central tenet of Christian theology, inspiring countless portrayals as the antithesis of God’s realm. Representations of Hell are associated with depictions of vices—specifically the seven deadly sins (anger, avarice, envy, gluttony, lust, pride, and sloth)—and with the devil, or Simia Dei (
Cheney 2016, pp. 488–519). Most importantly, Hell is the place where damned souls are believed to reside after death. However, Christian canonical scripture offers no detailed description of Hell’s location, shape, sensory attributes, or its malevolent inhabitants. In
Inferno, Dante depicts Hell as the ultimate domain of excruciating pain and eternal punishment (
Alighieri and Singleton 1990, pp. 5–10). Upon entering the
Inferno, Dante passes through an archway inscribed with the words: “Abandon all hope, you who enter here”. Lucy Beckett observes, “What is shocking, of course, about Dante’s hell is its finality…nothing here will ever change. Here there is no love for the loveless…no mercy for the eternally condemned” (
Barnes 2011, pp. 1–15).
From Erwin Panofsky’s iconological perspective, Dante’s
Inferno is a visual treasury rich in symbolic meaning. Through dramatic encounters, biblical typology, allegory, and complex metaphors, Dante renders theological concepts such as “sin,” “punishment,” and “despair and alienation” both concrete and visible (
Fisher 2024, p. 2). These images form a coherent symbolic system that conveys doctrine and mirrors the journey of the individual soul. Interwoven with historical, mythological, and biblical figures, this system anchors abstract theological teachings in a concrete critique of Florentine society, revealing the cultural foundations of its iconography (
Guénon 1925, pp. 24–28). More importantly, the narrative structure of the
Inferno creates a ritualized imaginative space. Guided by Virgil (representing reason) and Beatrice (representing divine grace), Dante embarks on a spiritual journey from Hell, through Purgatory, to Paradise (
Kleinhenz 1986, pp. 225–36). As Victor Turner and Hans Belting argue, this structure constitutes a “ritual space” (
Karamipour and Salehi Ardakani 2015, pp. 79–98), following the logic of a religious rite of passage—from condemnation and purification to ultimate bliss. This structure provides readers with a contemplative experience that transcends physical space, enabling a symbolic transformation of the soul through the text.
Since its inception, The Divine
Inferno has inspired countless visual interpretations. Sandro Botticelli’s 92 drawings for The
Divine Comedy have been especially praised for their beauty and sensitivity, offering a faithful visual rendering of the poem (
Watts 1995, pp. 163–201). Doré Gustave’s (
Jelbert 2021, pp. 154–87) wood engravings—renowned for their dramatic force—became some of the most widely circulated visual renditions of the poem. William Blake’s watercolor illustrations infused the text with anti-clerical emotional intensity (
Burnside 2018, pp. 1–12). These artistic responses continuously reshape the perception and semantic space of Dante’s text, attesting to the openness and vitality of its visual language.
This tradition of translating Dante’s text into visual form set the stage for 20th-century reinterpretations. The 700th anniversary of his birth in 1965 became a pivotal moment, drawing responses from academia, the media, and cultural institutions in the United States. From university courses and
New York Times features to the emergence of numerous non-academic Dante clubs, Dante emerged as a cultural icon within the realm of popular discourse (
Mare 1965, p. 29). Against the backdrop of Cold War anxieties, spiritual crises, and growing secularization, his reflections on human suffering and despair gained renewed relevance (
Mirzoeff 1999, p. 17). Robert Rauschenberg grew up in a fundamentalist Church of Christ family, and religious themes and imagery frequently appeared in his works from the late 1940s to the early 1950s (
Duffy 1997, pp. 92–101). It was within this historical context that Robert Rauschenberg created his
Inferno series (1958–1960), comprising thirty-four works corresponding to each canto of Dante’s
Inferno. Unlike his earlier and often controversial
Combines (
Folland 2010, pp. 348–65), this project was met with critical acclaim. In 1963, the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York acquired the series, which was later published as a deluxe edition by Harry N. Abrams and toured internationally. The
Inferno project marked a major turning point in Rauschenberg’s career, signifying a shift from formal experimentation toward deeper explorations of history and spirituality.
Scholars have interpreted Rauschenberg’s
Inferno series from various perspectives.
Auricchio (
1997) analyzes its queer coding and strategies of covert expression through the lens of metaphor and identity. Krauss focuses on its experimentation with media, particularly the innovations in image-making through solvent transfer techniques (
Krauss 1999, pp. 86–116). Hiroko and Robert emphasize its allegorical reconstruction of contemporary American society (
Hiroko and Rauschenberg 2010, pp. 205–8). Richards highlights Rauschenberg’s sustained interest in themes of religion and spirituality in his early works (
Richards 2011, pp. 39–49). Smith explores its visual dialogue with historical artists such as Botticelli (
Smith 2016c, pp. 77–103). Krčma examines Rauschenberg’s formal analysis and media experimentation in the
Inferno series (
Krčma 2017, pp. 964–75). These studies have undoubtedly provided valuable insights into the
Inferno series—its formal innovations, socio-political connections, identity politics, and art historical context. While this scholarship offers diverse perspectives, it has rarely addressed the
Inferno series from a religious or spiritual standpoint, nor examined in depth how Rauschenberg reconstructs and extends Dante’s religious visual narrative in a highly secularized context.
Drawing on detailed image analyses and historical contextualizations of previous research, this article examines how Rauschenberg conveys the spiritual dimension of Dante’s text through visual language, material experimentation, and modes of spectatorship—thus addressing a key gap in the literature on religion, spirituality, and modern art.
4. Media as a Spiritual Interface: Solvent Transfer and the Metaphysics of Materiality
4.1. Solvent Transfer and the Materiality of Secular Transcendence
Rauschenberg was a bold innovator in the field of visual media. In his Inferno series, he adopted solvent transfer to move away from traditional techniques such as painting or drawing, exploiting the medium’s tendency to blur, fragment, and reverse imagery in order to sever its ties to mass-media contexts. The resulting images are not full reproductions but unstable residues—traces that suggest what is absent. This absence is not void but a “presence-in-withdrawal,” oscillating between visibility and disappearance, staging what might be called a material manifestation of spiritual elusiveness.
Such ambiguity and contingency form the material basis of a secular spirituality: an attentiveness generated not by metaphysical salvation but through rupture, dislocation, and suspension in visual and historical conventions. Here, Derrida’s notion of the “trace” does not secure presence but points toward it through delay and deferral, evoking a fragile sense of the sacred (
Montag 2011, pp. 26–44). “Transcendence” in this context refers less to metaphysical salvation than to a rupture in visual and historical conventions. Solvent transfer breaks images open—blurring, reversing, and disrupting them—detaching them from their editorial frameworks. This distortion compels viewers into interpretive uncertainty, echoing the disorientation of Dante’s infernal journey. What is transcended, then, is not the world itself but the authority of traditional image-making, the coherence of realism, and even the unity of the pictorial surface. Rauschenberg’s medium destabilizes the image’s integrity, inviting a liminal space where trauma, memory, and doubt coexist—a material spirituality grounded in the fragmented conditions of modern existence.
Critics have frequently likened this effect to the low-resolution, flickering surfaces of mid-twentieth-century American television screens (
Gilbert 2017). As Joseph and Rauschenberg insightfully observed, this media effect reveals a new visual logic shaped by television and print culture—where images are no longer eternal and clear but unstable, blurred, and fragmented: a new visual ontology (
Joseph and Rauschenberg 2003, p. 177). In this sense, Rauschenberg’s medium is no longer a passive vessel for imagery but a dynamic interface—a permeable surface through which the image penetrates, dissolves, fragments, and recomposes itself.
The fragility of these images—with their blurred edges and ghostly contours—is not simply an aesthetic choice, but deeply echoes the themes of shadow and suffering in
Inferno. Since 1954, Rauschenberg had incorporated fragmented materials and imagery in his
Combine Paintings, arranging them according to an open-ended associative logic. In contrast, the
Inferno series provided a more ordered compositional framework through Dante’s tightly structured poetry, which, in Rauschenberg’s words, allowed him “to test whether I could work in a more constrained and structured way” (
Keach 2023, pp. 140–74). This structure led him to develop a visual language that interweaves fragmentation and figurative narration, generating a tension between chaos and form, as shown in
Table 2.
Rauschenberg often divided the picture plane into two or three horizontal bands, sometimes marked by hand-drawn lines extending across the composition. He also inserted rectangular frames into the composition, generating additional “spatial zones” where visual fragments from different temporal layers—past, present, and mythic—interweave. This compositional strategy is especially evident in the illustrations for Cantos 2 to 4 (The Descent, Vestibule of Hell, and Virtuous Pagans). In these works, the images frequently blur distinctions between foreground and background, literal and symbolic, universal and particular, turning the picture surface into a theatrical stage where Dante’s poetic narrative engages with the cultural anxieties of Cold War-era America.
For instance, in Dante’s
Inferno Canto 18, the narrative describes the first and second bolgias of Malebolge in the eighth circle of Hell, where mainly “fraudsters” and “pimps” are punished. Here, Sinners are scourged by demons, stripped naked, and immersed in filth, reflecting the moral corruption and degradation of their crimes.In Rauschenberg’s
Inferno Canto 18 (
Figure 10), Dante and Virgil appear in the image’s upper-left corner as small, marginal figures. This arrangement highlights the punished bodies as the central visual focus. The punishment of panderers and flatterers—endless marching and immersion in excrement—is visualized through a choreography diagram, annotated with penciled arrows. These arrows resemble schematic diagrams from industrial manuals, suggesting that punishment in hell has been systematized, depersonalized, and even choreographed. The lower portion of the image includes close-up visuals of human waste, which blur and obscure the faces of the damned. The dark palette and hazy visuals suggest that the paper’s surface itself contributes to the degradation of these bodies.
The “spirituality” conveyed through the materiality of Rauschenberg’s medium is not the conventional form rooted in transcendental faith or doctrine. Instead, it denotes a modern, secular experience of uncertainty, fragmentation, and emotional intensity, emerging from the viewer’s encounter with degraded images, ambiguous signs, and disrupted visual coherence. The solvent transfer serves not as a conduit for divine revelation, but as a means of evoking existential reflection, temporal dislocation, and the search for meaning amid visual and historical instability. For instance, in Rauschenberg’s
Inferno Canto 31, Nimrod’s figure is created through a selective transfer of a weightlifter’s photograph. Only the torso’s center remains intact, while the rest dissolves into blurred, liquefied stains, making Nimrod resemble a failed photographic negative emerging from solvent traces. His “partial visibility” not only signifies the punishment for hubris but also symbolizes the limits of human perception when facing the monstrous. Precisely for this reason, the ambiguity of solvent transfer became Rauschenberg’s most powerful tool for conveying The
Inferno’s core themes: invisible fear, unknowable realms, and unspeakable suffering. For viewers at the Castelli Gallery, these layered images—worn by mechanical reproduction and distorted by technical processes (
Krauss 1981, pp. 47–66)—were not simply seen but experienced as a modern ritual of descent. This immersive experience, echoing Dante’s narrative arc, turned aesthetic contemplation into a mediated spiritual journey—a living response to Virgil’s iconic warning: “Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.”
4.2. Fragmented Narration and Continuous Temporality
When creating illustrations for his
Inferno series, Rauschenberg adopted a “one canto at a time” approach: he began working immediately after reading the English translation of each canto, without reading ahead. This method aimed to elicit an immediate response to each canto’s context, enabling him to re-experience Dante’s evolving narrative across centuries (
Antonella 2011, pp. 323–37).
Rauschenberg treated time as a compositional element, juxtaposition Dante’s sacred narrative with contemporary Cold War imagery. The imagery in each canto corresponds to contemporary events at the time of its creation, producing a visual expression of simultaneity. The size of each image was carefully calibrated to reflect the narrative weight of the corresponding text. As Rauschenberg explained to Krauss: “The space given to each image corresponds to the space occupied by the author’s words” (
Krauss 1999, pp. 86–116). For instance, in
Inferno Canto 31, when Dante and Virgil encounter giants—massive figures described in detail and mistaken for mountain-like forms—Rauschenberg selected an image of Olympic wrestlers that spans the width of the page. This image covers more than half the page, making it one of the largest transferred images in the series. This precise alignment with the text suggests that the
Inferno illustrations are not merely visual “representations,” but rather a synchronous construction of textual structure, temporal density, and visual rhythm. To emphasize the text–image juxtaposition, Rauschenberg added brief narrative summaries—typed by Michael Sonnabend—to each work.
Rauschenberg often overlaid solvent transfer images with arrows and technical drawing lines to create a visual guidance system. This system functions both as a path indicator and as a theological response to industrialized visuality. For example, some images depict scenes of gilded arms being transported behind car windows, reflecting a contradictory fusion of the religious and the mechanical. Although certain elements clearly reference Dante’s narrative, the precise correspondence between image and text is often ambiguous and unstable (
Feinstein 1990, p. 346). Dore Ashton once attempted to “read” these images linearly from top left to bottom right but soon realized that such a linear sequence is likely absent (
Dore 1963, p. 37). This is a key characteristic of the solvent transfer medium: the inherent chaotic ambiguity of the images transforms viewing into a state of deep meditation. In this mode of viewing, the audience gazes with focused intensity, much like confronting an icon—facing a juxtaposition of the full moon and industrial crane wreckage, entering a profound state where perception and cognition intertwine.
Dante’s
Inferno itself possesses a loosely integrated structure—each canto can be appreciated as a relatively independent fragment, yet woven into a unified design by divine arrangement (
Alighieri et al. 1982, pp. 21–23). Rauschenberg extends this tension visually, acting like an “image-based montage practitioner” who reconstructs Dante’s underworld journey through the visual syntax of fragmentation of his
Combine Paintings. Within a single image, multiple temporal-spatial scenes, iconic symbols, and allegorical actions are juxtaposed—for example, in
Canto 31, the giant’s torso, Antaeus’s hand, chains, and horns appear side by side—expressing a nonlinear spiritual narrative.
Just as Dante often introduces the next canto with a refrain, Rauschenberg sometimes links two images through shifting visual motifs. Cantos 31 and 32 exemplify this—giant feet and legs reappear at the top of the Canto 32 illustration. In Rauschenberg’s
Inferno Canto 7 illustration, Dante and Virgil are shown only as legs and lower body contours at the top edge of the image, implying passage through a heterotopic space. In Dante’s
Inferno Canto 34, Dante and his guide leave the deepest part of Hell—the Circle of Judas—where they behold Lucifer himself. The devil’s vast wings beat relentlessly, producing icy gales that freeze the waters of Lake Cocytus—a potent symbol of absolute cold and despair. Thereafter, Dante and his guide climb up and down Lucifer’s body, emerge from Hell, and enter a natural cavern, preparing to return to the light of the living world. This moment combines elements of terror, desolation, and deliverance, marking the end of the journey through hell. In Rauschenberg’s
Inferno Canto 34 (
Figure 11), movement unfolds along a continuous vertical path from top to bottom, echoing Dante’s description of the inverted descent through Lucifer’s body. The heterogeneity and scale differences within these images resonate with Dante’s portrayal of hell’s fragmented nature, as well as his own confusion and moral disorientation when confronting hell. Rauschenberg once expressed to Clement Greenberg his desire to “recreate Dante’s sensory overload in understanding human sin and suffering.” The visual spectacles crafted by Cold War media provided a contemporary context for this goal—within these “media inferno,” morality and truth themselves became obscured and ambiguous.
4.3. The Spirituality of Material
The solvent transfer technique employed by Rauschenberg exemplifies “material spirituality,” a concept that highlights the capacity of material forms and artistic processes to generate spiritual experience within secular contexts. Instead of seeking to restore a lost sacred aura, his practice reactivates materiality—through blurring, erasure, and fragmentation—as a site where spirituality emerges in contingent, elusive traces. Rauschenberg made extensive use of images from contemporary magazines such as
Life and
Sports Illustrated (
Siedell 1999, p. 75;
Cullinan 2008, pp. 460–70). In Walter Benjamin’s terms, these mass-produced industrial images—highly reproducible and widely accessible—had long lost their traditional “aura” (
W. Benjamin 2018, pp. 226–43). Unlike religious images shaped by ritualized viewing and the passage of time, magazine photographs intrinsically lack uniqueness or sacred value. Rather than attempting to restore this lost aura, Rauschenberg’s solvent transfers re-materialize the images through the very process of manual rubbing, which introduces contingency—blurring, erasure, and fragmentation. This procedure produces singular, unrepeatable traces that simultaneously embody artistic control and its loss.
It is precisely within this tension that Rauschenberg reopens the possibility of spiritual presence. Yet this presence is not the direct revelation of the divine, but what might be called a negative presence—a spectral remainder perceptible only through absence. The solvent transfer’s blurred edges and fragmentary marks do not disclose transcendence positively but intimate it through withdrawal, what Derrida describes as a “trace”. In this sense, the transfer mediates “between visibility and spiritual presence” not by manifesting sacred content but by embodying the paradox of a presence marked by disappearance. Branden Joseph insightfully compares these traces to stigmata: like wounds that mark divine intervention through corporeal rupture, Rauschenberg’s solvent traces mark the convergence of history, material process, and artistic intent (
Joseph and Rauschenberg 2003, p. 177). They function neither as purely symbolic images nor as mere material residues, but as indexical inscriptions where spirituality arises through its very elusiveness.
Embedded within Dante’s textual framework, these transferred images transform fragments of consumer culture into symbols of spiritual elusiveness. For example, in
Canto 31, a photograph of Olympic wrestlers is transfigured into a blurred giant, echoing Dante’s figure of bondage yet refusing stable representation. Here, meaning is not given but demanded: confronted with fragmented, unstable imagery, viewers must pause, reflect, and assemble significance from partial signs (
Palmer 2007, pp. 1–8). This act of projection transforms looking itself into a contemplative practice. Unlike Dante’s
Inferno, which directs the pilgrim toward purification and redemption, Rauschenberg’s
Inferno opens onto a spiritual space defined by instability, alienation (
Matthews 1966, p. 68), and the impossibility of transcendence.
In this way, the Inferno illustrations become tools for secular visual contemplation. Their blurred and fissured surfaces disrupt the functional logic of mass media and reawaken perceptual attentiveness. This contingent, trace-based quality does not rest on originality or sacred authority, but emerges through the viewer’s active, interpretive labor. Rather than guiding toward redemption, Rauschenberg’s transfer images stage a modern ritual of descent without God, in which viewers confront despair, absence, and fragmentation, and through this confrontation cultivate a fragile yet persistent form of spiritual attentiveness. Whereas Dante’s Inferno ultimately serves the pilgrim’s purification within a teleological framework of salvation, Rauschenberg’s Inferno offers no such eschatological horizon. Instead, it transforms the descent into a secular ritual of perception, where viewers are confronted with fragmentation, absence, and instability. The “spirituality” at stake here is not transcendence beyond the secular, but a fragile attentiveness to meaning within the very conditions of modern alienation.
4.4. A Ritual Without God: The Rituality of Viewing in Rauschenberg’s Work
Rauschenberg’s Inferno series uses an unconventional interpretive mode to deconstruct the sacredness and authority of traditional religious imagery, while at the same time constructing a spiritual ritual rooted in modernity. In the post-religious era, spiritual experience shifts away from the church and toward acts of viewing, the fluidity of images, and inner processes of perception (
Belting 2005, pp. 302–19). Accordingly, the series can be seen as a form of “secular pilgrimage.” It transforms the exhibition into a ritual space, elevates viewing into a performative act, and turns fragmented images into vehicles of modern spiritual meditation (
Morgan 1998, p. 50). This ritual of viewing, grounded in material traces and perceptual participation, differs sharply from Andy Warhol’s commodified repetition of religious motifs, which suggest the consumption of faith, and from Bill Viola’s immersive video installations, which pursue the contemporary sublime. Rauschenberg’s path is one of “descent”: it embraces ambiguity, fragmentation, and the noise of everyday life—excrement, advertisements, and images of catastrophe. Within the rough corporeality of carnivalesque aesthetics (
Lachmann 1988, pp. 115–52) and the material “failures” of the medium (blurring, dissolution), spirituality arises through direct confrontation with the conditions of existence and through a profound mode of perceptual engagement.
This ritual is concretely activated in the exhibition process, producing a unique “viewing ritual”. In contrast to many medieval church contexts, where meaning was mediated through liturgy or clerical authority, viewers of Rauschenberg’s works enter an open, fluid, and ambiguous interpretive space (
Mitchell 2005, pp. 336–41). His images are no longer fixed symbolic systems but fragmented elements cut, transferred, and reassembled. This fragmentation destabilizes the boundaries of sacred narrative and forces viewers to rely on their own perception for interpretation. Thus, viewing no longer centers on receiving meaning but shifts toward actively generating it. Viewers move through the gallery, pause, contemplate, and develop personal rhythms of experience, becoming poets of their own pilgrimage (
Bourriaud 2002, p. 125). Ultimately, this ritual is less about attaining redemption than about sustaining an open cycle of resistance, reflection, and provisional meaning.
More significantly, the locus of spirituality shifts from external ritual and institutional authority to inward personal experience. In traditional religious imagery, sacredness typically derives from divine manifestation, saintly guidance, or doctrinal authority. By contrast, in Rauschenberg’s visual world, spirituality emerges as a state of “contemplative engagement” between viewer and image—a contemplative, ineffable relation grounded in interiority. This inward turn resonates with modern existentialism and phenomenology that affirm the value of individual perception (
Eliade 1959, p. 81). Rauschenberg’s
Inferno illustrations are thus not merely responses to religious visual traditions; they also attempt to construct a contemporary ritual form. The traditional moral journey is reimagined as a spiritual passage enacted through acts of seeing, interpreting, and perceiving. In this journey, each viewer becomes a traveler, a thinker, and the author of their own Inferno. This ritualistic quality depends heavily on specific visual conditions created by the medium—fragmentation, blurring, and trace-based ambiguity. It is precisely the visual uncertainty and openness of meaning produced by the medium (solvent transfer) that compel viewers to abandon passive reception and enter an active, contemplative mode of seeing. This mode itself constitutes the core practice of the secular spiritual ritual that Rauschenberg designed. He holds a unique position in the postwar lineage of religious art: he neither returns to traditional notions of the sublime (as Viola does) nor indulges in postmodern irony (as some of Warhol’s works do) (
B.-C. Benjamin 2000, pp. 1–36). Instead, through a material critique of the medium and a ritualized reconstruction of the viewing process, he forges a path that confronts the burdens of existence through art and activates individualized spiritual resonance in an era of divine withdrawal. The outcome of this “ritual without God” is not purification in the Dantean sense but a secular practice of endurance—an act of facing fragmentation, ambiguity, and the absurd, through which viewers may discover either an individual resonance or a fleeting sense of shared human condition. Therefore, by deconstructing traditional image sacredness and narrative authority, Rauschenberg reconstructs the function of artistic space as a “secular sanctuary” and the act of viewing as a practice of a “Ritual Without God,” offering a non-institutionalized spiritual pathway for individuals seeking meaning in a secularized world.
5. Conclusions
This study has examined Rauschenberg’s Inferno series as a reconfiguration of Dante’s vision within the conditions of Cold War modernity. Through solvent transfers, Rauschenberg transformed fragments of mass media into unstable, contingent traces that mediate between material process and spiritual presence. These blurred and fragmented marks do not restore the sacred aura of religious imagery but reopen a space of attentiveness where viewers confront existential estrangement. In this sense, the Inferno illustrations enact what might be called a “ritual without God”—a secular practice of perception in which spirituality persists not as transcendence, but as fragile meaning-making grounded in material trace.
By recasting Dante’s narrative of eternal punishment into a fragmented, secularized visual form, Rauschenberg redefines the role of art in the post-religious age: not to promise redemption, but to sustain the possibility of spiritual engagement. The Inferno series thus stands as a key case study at the intersection of art and spirituality, significant for showing how media materiality can generate new forms of secular ritual and spiritual attentiveness. This contribution deepens debates on the persistence and transformation of religiosity in secularization theory and provides critical resources for rethinking the relation between religion, art, and spirituality in contemporary culture.