How Facebook Mediated COVID-19 Risk Communication: Evidence from Chinese External Media During the Winter Olympics
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Communication Effectiveness of Facebook
2.2. Relationship Management Theory
2.3. Information Presentation
2.4. Dialogue Intervention
2.5. Technical Functionality
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM)
3.2. Data Source
4. Results
5. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Variable Name | Variable Description | Encoding |
---|---|---|
Information Presentation | ||
Describing Risk Scientifically | Whether specific numbers are used for analyzing risk | 0: None; 1: Yes |
Passing Risk Information | The likelihood of explicit or hidden losses of the subject in a crisis and the magnitude of its losses | 0: None; 1: Yes |
Enhancing Risk Alertness | Warning the public about how to avoid potential crises and their negative impacts | 0: None; 1: Yes |
Dialogic Intervention | ||
Dialogic Expansion | Whether direct or indirect quotations to express its views are used in context | 0: None; 1: Yes |
Dialogic Contraction | Whether the content interweaves its own evaluation or influences public opinion, e.g., ”we think COVID-19 was a terrible disaster for humans” | 0: No text, pictures or videos; 1: Text or image or video only; 2: Text image or text video |
Technical Functionality | ||
The Use of Hashtags # | Whether hashtags # are used in text context | 0: None; 1: Yes |
The Use of Mention @ | Whether mention @ are used in text context | 0: None; 1: Yes |
The Use of Visual Messages | Whether pictures or videos are used in context | 0: None; 1: Yes |
The Use of Hyperlinks | Whether hyperlinks are used in text context | 0: None; 1: Yes |
Communication Effectiveness of Facebook | ||
Communication Effectiveness | A combination of retweets, comments and likes | A combination of retweets, comments and likes |
References
- Kanin, D.B. A Political History of the Olympic Games; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, B. Power Discourse, Meaning Export and National Public Relations. Chin. J. Journal. Commun. 2008, 5, 14–18+24. [Google Scholar]
- Verweij, M.; Douglas, M.; Ellis, R.; Engel, C.; Hendriks, F.; Lohmann, S.; Ney, S.; Rayner, S.; Thompson, M. Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World: The Case of Climate Change. Public Adm. 2006, 84, 817–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobs, R.N.; Sobieraj, S. Narrative and Legitimacy: US Congressional Debates about the Nonprofit Sector. Sociol. Theory 2007, 25, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, B.D.; Valero, J.N.; Kim, K. Social Media, Trust, and Disaster: Does Trust in Public and Nonprofit Organizations Explain Social Media Use during a Disaster? Qual. Quant. 2018, 52, 537–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katz, M.; Nandi, N. Social Media and Medical Education in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review. JMIR Med. Educ. 2021, 7, e25892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, N.; Cui, S.; Khanna, K.; Knieling, V.; Duggal, Y.N.; Shao, M. Investigation of the Gender-Specific Discourse about Online Learning during COVID-19 on Twitter Using Sentiment Analysis, Subjectivity Analysis, and Toxicity Analysis. Computers 2023, 12, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daly, P.; Mahdi, S.; Mundir, I.; McCaughey, J.; Amalia, C.S.; Jannah, R.; Horton, B. Social capital and community integration in post-disaster relocation settlements after the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami in Indonesia. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2023, 95, 103861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, N.; Patel, K.A.; Poon, A.; Shah, R.; Azizi, N.; Han, C. A Comprehensive Analysis and Investigation of the Public Discourse on Twitter about Exoskeletons from 2017 to 2023. J. Future Internet 2023, 15, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Messaoudi, C.; Guessoum, Z.; Ben Romdhane, L. Opinion Mining in Online Social Media: A Survey. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 2022, 12, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, N. Investigating and Analyzing Self-Reporting of Long COVID on Twitter: Findings from Sentiment Analysis. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2023, 6, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DataReportal. Digital 2023: Global Overview Report. 2023. Available online: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-global-overview-report (accessed on 10 April 2024).
- Han, R.; Tan, X.; Zhang, J. The Opinion Emotional Characteristics and Media Driving Mechanism of China’s Image on International Social Media Platforms. J. Nanjing Univ. Posts Telecommun. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2023, 25, 10–19. [Google Scholar]
- You, H. Cross-platform Comparative Study of Social Media Mention to Scholarly Papers: A Study of Facebook and Twitter. Inf. Stud. Theory Appl. 2022, 45, 187–194. [Google Scholar]
- Ledingham, J.A.; Bruning, S.D. Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organization-public relationship. Public Relations Rev. 1998, 24, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ledingham, J.A.; Bruning, S.D. Public Relations as Relationship Management; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NI, USA, 2001; pp. 7–68. [Google Scholar]
- Stewart, M.C.; Wilson, B.G. The dynamic role of social media during Hurricane #Sandy: An introduction of the STREMII model to weather the storm of the crisis lifecycle. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 54, 639–646. [Google Scholar]
- Finau, G.; Cox, J.; Tarai, J.; Kant, R.; Varea, R.; Titifanue, J. Social media and disaster communication: A case study of Cyclone Winston. Pac. Journal. Rev. Koakoa 2018, 24, 123–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engdahl, E.; Lidskog, R. Risk, communication and trust: Towards an emotional understanding of trust. Public Underst. Sci. 2014, 23, 703–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, K.H.; Shao, C.; Nah, S. Localized social media and civic life: Motivations, trust, and civic participation in local community contexts. J. Inf. Technol. Politics 2020, 18, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.E.; Cho, J. Social Media Use and Well-Being in People with Physical Disabilities: Influence of SNS and Online Community Uses on Social Support, Depression, and Psychological Disposition. Health Commun. 2019, 34, 1043–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yudarwati, G.A.; Putranto, I.A.; Delmo, K.M. Examining the Indonesian Government’s Social Media Use for Disaster Risk Communication. Asian J. Commun. 2021, 32, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kavada, A. Social Media as Conversation: A Manifesto. Media Soc. 2015, 1, 205630511558079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutton, J.; Gibson, C.B.; Phillips, N.E.; Spiro, E.S.; League, C.; Johnson, B.; Fitzhugh, S.M.; Butts, C.T. A Cross-hazard Analysis of Terse Message Retransmission on Twitter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 48, 14793–14798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhalerao, A.A.; Naiknaware, B.R.; Manza, R.R.; Bagal, V.; Bawiskar, S.K. Social Media Mining Using Machine Learning Techniques as a Survey. In Proceedings of the Advances in Computer Science Research. Atlantis Press International BV, Chengdu, China, 12–14 April 2023; pp. 874–889. [Google Scholar]
- Boyd, D.; Golder, S.; Lotan, G. Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, Honolulu, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2010; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Gallant, L.M.; Lrizarry, C.; Boone, G.; Kreps, G. Promoting Participatory Medicine with Social Media: New Media Applications on Hospital Websites that Enhance Health Education and E-patients’ Voices. J. Particip. Med. 2011, 3, 49. [Google Scholar]
- Honey, C.; Herring, S.C. Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2009; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M.; Danks, N.P.; Ray, S. An Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling. In Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook; Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 1–29. [Google Scholar]
- Meng, S.; Shang, J.; Zhang, F.; Yang, F.; Liu, M. Research on the Impact of COVID-19 Science Information Dissemination on Social Media and the Factors Influencing the Choice of Crisis Coping Strategies: An Empirical Analysis Based on Popular Micro—Blog Texts of Scientists’ Groups. Libr. Inf. Serv. 2022, 66, 91–101. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, C.; Yang, S.U. Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other. Public Relat. Rev. 2017, 43, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orellana-Rodriguez, C.; Keane, M.T. Attention to news and its dissemination on Twitter: A survey. Comput. Sci. Rev. 2018, 29, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hills, T.T. The dark side of information proliferation. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2019, 14, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malecki, K.M.C.; Keating, J.A.; Safdar, N. Crisis Communication and Public Perception of COVID-19 Risk in the Era of Social Media. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 72, 697–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Category | Variable | Classification | Number | Percentage/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
IP | Describing Risk Scientifically | None | 130 | 60.47 |
Yes | 85 | 39.53 | ||
Passing Risk Information | None | 126 | 58.60 | |
Yes | 89 | 41.40 | ||
Enhancing Risk Alertness | None | 100 | 46.51 | |
Yes | 115 | 53.49 | ||
DI | Dialogue Expansion | None | 129 | 60.00 |
Yes | 86 | 40.00 | ||
Dialogue Contraction | 0 | 117 | 54.42 | |
1 | 36 | 16.74 | ||
2 | 62 | 28.84 | ||
SMTF | Tag # | None | 61 | 28.37 |
Yes | 154 | 71.63 | ||
Mention @ | None | 213 | 99.5 | |
Yes | 2 | 0.5 | ||
Audio-Visual Information | None | 155 | 72.09 | |
Yes | 60 | 27.91 | ||
Hyperlink | None | 86 | 40.00 | |
Yes | 129 | 60.00 |
Index | Value | Standard | Fit |
---|---|---|---|
7.251 | —— | —— | |
1.813 | <3 | Fit | |
GFI | 0.987 | >0.9 | Fit |
CFI | 0.986 | >0.9 | Fit |
NFI | 0.970 | >0.9 | Fit |
NNFI | 0.965 | >0.9 | Fit |
AGFI | 0.950 | >0.9 | Fit |
IFI | 0.986 | >0.9 | Fit |
RMSEA | 0.062 | <0.10 | Fit |
RMR | 0.015 | <0.05 | Fit |
SRMR | 0.039 | <0.10 | Fit |
Factor | AVE Value | CR Value |
---|---|---|
Information Presentation | 0.511 | 0.758 |
Dialogue Intervention | 0.641 | 0.766 |
IP | DI | |
---|---|---|
Information Presentation | ||
Dialogue Intervention |
Coding Category | B | SE | t | P | 95% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constant | 3.392 | 0.269 | 12.615 | 0.000 ** | [2.865, 3.919] |
Describing Risk Scientifically | 0.724 | 0.266 | 2.722 | 0.007 ** | [0.203, 1.245] |
Passing Risk Information | 0.810 | 0.272 | 2.974 | 0.003 ** | [0.276, 1.344] |
Enhancing Risk Alertness | 0.549 | 0.272 | 2.021 | 0.045 * | [0.017, 1.082] |
Dialogue Expansion | 1.046 | 0.261 | 4.003 | 0.000 ** | [0.534, 1.558] |
Dialogue Contraction | −0.211 | 0.145 | −1.452 | 0.148 | [−0.496, 0.074] |
R² | 0.306 | ||||
Adjusted R² | 0.290 | ||||
Sample Size | 215 |
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | p | B | p | B | p | |
Constant | 4.357 | 0.000 ** | 4.357 | 0.000 ** | 4.344 | 0.000 ** |
Dialogue Intervention | 0.594 | 0.000 ** | 0.626 | 0.002 ** | 0.661 | 0.001 ** |
Use Hyperlink | −0.936 | 0.000 ** | −0.927 | 0.000 ** | ||
DI * Hyperlink | 1.103 | 0.012 * | ||||
R² | 0.038 | 0.099 | 0.126 | |||
Adjusted R² | 0.033 | 0.090 | 0.113 |
X → Y | B | SE | z(CR) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
IP → CE | 1.993 | 0.266 | 7.487 | 0.000 |
DI → CE | 0.340 | 0.173 | 1.967 | 0.049 |
TF → CE | −0.698 | 0.264 | −2.643 | 0.008 |
IP → TF | −0.249 | 0.067 | −3.744 | 0.000 |
DI → TF | −0.030 | 0.045 | −0.681 | 0.496 |
Path | Total Effect | Direct Effect | Indirect Effect |
---|---|---|---|
IP → TF → CE | 2.167 | 1.993 | 0.174 |
DI → TF → CE | 0.340 | 0.340 | − |
Number | Questions and Hypothesis | Valid or Not |
---|---|---|
RQ1 | Does the information presentation and dialogue intervention have a combined impact on the communication effectiveness of Facebook? | Valid |
H1a | Describing risk scientifically has a positive impact on the communication effectiveness of Facebook. | Valid |
H1b | Passing risk information has a positive impact on the communication effectiveness of Facebook. | Valid |
H1c | Enhancing risk alertness has a positive impact on the communication effectiveness of Facebook. | Valid |
H2a | Dialogue expansion has a positive impact on the communication effectiveness of Facebook. | Valid |
H2b | Dialogue contraction has a positive impact on the communication effectiveness of Facebook. | Invalid |
H3a | Hyperlinks serve to moderate the relationship between information presentation and the communication effectiveness of Facebook. | Invalid |
H3b | Hyperlinks serve to moderate the relationship between dialogue intervention and the communication effectiveness of Facebook. | Valid |
RQ2a | Does the technical functionality act as a mediator between information presentation and its communication effectiveness? | Valid |
RQ2b | Does the technical functionality act as a mediator between dialogue intervention and its communication effectiveness? | Invalid |
Video Content | Mean | t | Sig. (Two-Tailed) |
---|---|---|---|
Moving Videos | 2.84 | −3.308 | 0.002 ** |
Non-moving Videos | 3.75 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhang, L.; Zhou, Y.-X.; Shang, K.-k. How Facebook Mediated COVID-19 Risk Communication: Evidence from Chinese External Media During the Winter Olympics. Information 2025, 16, 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040306
Zhang L, Zhou Y-X, Shang K-k. How Facebook Mediated COVID-19 Risk Communication: Evidence from Chinese External Media During the Winter Olympics. Information. 2025; 16(4):306. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040306
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Liwen, Yi-Xin Zhou, and Ke-ke Shang. 2025. "How Facebook Mediated COVID-19 Risk Communication: Evidence from Chinese External Media During the Winter Olympics" Information 16, no. 4: 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040306
APA StyleZhang, L., Zhou, Y.-X., & Shang, K.-k. (2025). How Facebook Mediated COVID-19 Risk Communication: Evidence from Chinese External Media During the Winter Olympics. Information, 16(4), 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040306