Next Article in Journal
Chelating Mechanisms of Transition Metals by Bacterial Metallophores “Pseudopaline and Staphylopine”: A Quantum Chemical Assessment
Previous Article in Journal
Computational Analysis of the Performance Characteristics of a Supercritical CO2 Centrifugal Compressor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spatial Diversity for CDMA RoFSO Links over M Turbulence Channels with Nonzero Boresight Pointing Errors

by
Michalis P. Ninos
and
Hector E. Nistazakis
*
Department of Electronics, Computers, Telecommunications and Control, Faculty of Physics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 15784, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Computation 2018, 6(4), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/computation6040055
Submission received: 9 September 2018 / Revised: 19 October 2018 / Accepted: 25 October 2018 / Published: 28 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Computational Engineering)

Abstract

:
A CDMA RoFSO link with receivers’ spatial diversity is studied. Turbulence-induced fading, modeled by the M(alaga) distribution, is considered that hamper the FSO link performance along with the nonzero boresight pointing errors effect. Novel, analytical closed-form expressions are extracted for the estimation of the average bit-error-rate and the outage probability of the CDMA RoFSO system for both directions of the forward and the reverse link. The numerical results show clearly the performance improvement of using spatial diversity, even in the most adverse atmospheric conditions with strong and saturated atmospheric turbulence with enhanced misalignment. Also, the effects of nonlinear distortion, multiple access interference and clipping noise aggravate the performance of the link, where cases with large number of users are taken into account.

1. Introduction

Free-space optical (FSO) systems have emerged over the last few years as a valuable solution for broadband networks, providing performance features with high data rate applications and high security transmission due the narrow optical beam [1]. Analogue intensity modulation (AIM) technique comprises a low cost and simple modulation technique for optical communications, which finds applications in cable TV (CATV) distributions, radio-over-fiber (RoF), radio-on-free-space optics (RoFSO) etc. [2]. RoFSO systems constitute a relatively new wireless technology with the similar aim to the RoF technique of distributing radio frequency (RF) signals among central base stations (CBS) and remote antenna units (RAU) (Figure 1) [3,4].
However, FSO links experience the detrimental influence of atmospheric-related phenomena such as atmospheric turbulence, pointing errors (PE), beam wander, atmospheric attenuation etc., [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Turbulence-induced irradiance fluctuations are studied statistically and many statistical distribution models have been proposed over the years, according the specific turbulence conditions. In the weak turbulence regime the log-normal and the gamma distribution models have been proven that describe accurately the statistics of the irradiance fluctuations. From weak up to strong turbulence conditions the gamma-gamma model constitutes a very accurate model while for strong and saturate turbulence conditions the K and the negative exponential models are the most suitable [5]. Recently, the M(alaga) model has been proposed in the literature, which has the significant advantage of unifying almost all the previous-mentioned distribution models as special cases [6]. Additionally, PE impairments are also considered a serious degradation factor for FSO systems [7,8]. In this work, we employ a new generalized PE model that approximates the Beckmann distribution with a modified Rayleigh distribution. In this model, nonzero boresight (NZB) displacement and different spatial jitters for the axes of the receiver are taken into account [9].
In order to mitigate the influence of the atmospheric turbulence and the PE, diversity schemes have been proposed and used [1,2,14,15,16,17]. Spatial diversity technique can be realized when a multitude of transmit or receive apertures are employed [1,2]. In the present work, we assume a RoFSO system with spatial diversity on the receivers and multiple laser sources at the transmitter. Each one of the laser sources is directed towards a specific receiver. The objective of this configuration is to harness the maximum optical radiation for each diversity branch.
Code-division multiple access (CDMA) is a widely used multiple access technique, where multiple users communicate using the same band of frequency. CDMA is based on the spread spectrum (SS) technique where each user is provided with a unique spreading code. CDMA was commercially adopted in the cellular standards of IS-95, IS-2000 and UMTS, [18]. It is also considered, for potential applications in the future cellular standards, in combination with orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA), [4].
Thus, in this work we investigate a RoFSO system with receivers’ spatial diversity for transmission of CDMA signals. The specific CDMA RoFSO system is studied in both, the forward and the reverse link. The performance evaluation is carried out with the average bit error rate (ABER) and the outage probability (OP) estimation, taking into account nonlinear effects related to the optical link, the multiple access interference (MAI), the atmospheric turbulence effect modeled by the M-distribution and the NZB PE. Closed-form expressions are extracted for the aforementioned performance metrics and numerical results are illustrated using the derived expressions.

2. The CDMA RoFSO System with Spatial Diversity

2.1. Forward Link

A thorough analysis of the CDMA point to point (P2P) RoFSO link is presented in Ref. [19]. The proposed spatially diverse system is composed of M-individual P2P links, where a set of M laser emitters transmit towards an array of M receivers. So, at the CBS K CDMA user’s signals proceed for optical transmission through the wireless spatially diverse optical link. Each laser transmitter is linked with a specific receiver as it can be seen in Figure 1. In the case of the forward link transmission, the detected carrier to noise plus interference power ratio for each k-th user (CNIRk) in a specific m-th P2P link is given as, [19]:
C N I R k , f , m ( I m ) ( m k , m ρ m L t o t , m P 0 I m ) 2 2 ( N 0 , m B A V + n N L D , f , k , m A V ) ,
where the subscript symbol f denotes the forward link, mk,m is the optical modulation index (OMI) for each user, ρm is the optoelectronic conversion ratio of the photo-detector (PD), Ltot,m corresponds to the total losses of the P2P wireless optical link due to path loss, geometrical loss etc., P0 is the average transmitted optical power and Im is the total normalized instantaneous irradiance at the receiver’s input. The random variable of Im is a product of two random factors which correspond to the atmospheric turbulence It,m and the PE Ip,m i.e., Im = It,mIp,m. The power spectral density N0,m of the optical link noise for the mth receiver is given as, [4,19]:
N 0 , m = N t h , m + N s h o t , m + N R I N , m = 4 K B T R L + 2 q I p h , m + I p h , m 2 ( R I N ) ( 1 + k = 1 K m k , m 2 s k 2 ( t ) ) ,
where KB is the Boltzmann’s constant, T is the absolute temperature, RL is the receiver circuit load resistor, q is the electron charge, RIN is the relative intensity noise factor of the laser diode (LD) and Iph,m is the dc value of the photo-induced current at the mth receiver and is given as I p h , m = ρ m L t o t , m P 0 I m = ρ m P R , m I m with PR,m being the average received optical power at the mth receiver. The parameter B is the bandpass filter bandwidth of the receiver centered at the RF carrier frequency fc. We assume that the receivers have very narrow field of view (FOV) and employ optical bandpass filters (OBPF) in the form of coatings on the receivers’ optics. The OBPF have Δλ < 1 nm in order to reduce significantly the background radiation IB from the sun and the sky. In case this is not happened, the background noise contributes to the shot noise term i.e., N s h o t , m = 2 q ( I p h , m + I B , m ) , [2] (Equation (2.44)). Finally, the total nonlinear distortion for the forward link, i.e., nNLD,f,m, is a sum of the 3rd order inter-modulation distortion (IMD3) and the clipping distortion n N L D , f , k , m = σ I M D , f , k , m 2 + σ c l , k , m 2 which are given as, [19]:
σ I M D , f , k , m 2 = 9 α 3 2 m k , m 6 ( K 1 ) I p h , m 2 128
and
σ c l , k , m 2 = I p h , m 2 m k , m 6 K 3 27.2 exp ( 1 2 m k , m 2 K )

2.2. Reverse Link

On the reverse link, K CDMA user’s signals arrive at the antenna base station at a specific time instant and the carrier to noise plus interference power ratio for each kth user (CNIRk) in a P2P link is given as [19]:
C N I R k , r , m ( I ) ( m k , m ρ m L t o t , m P 0 I m ) 2 2 ( N 0 , m B A V + n N L D , r , k , m A V ) ,
where the subscript symbol r denotes the reverse link and all the parameters are the same as the aforementioned for the forward link except for the total nonlinear distortion on the reverse link, i.e., nNLD,r,k,m. The nNLD,rk,m is a sum of the 3rd order inter-modulation distortion (IMD3) of the reverse link, the clipping distortion given in (4) and the generated MAI due to the asynchronous transmission n N L D , r , k , m = σ I M D , r , k , m 2 + σ c l , k , m 2 + σ M A I , k , m 2 . The IMD3 for the case of the reverse link and the MAI are evaluated as [19]:
σ I M D , r , k , m 2 = ( m k , m I p h , m ) 2 2 [ α 3 m k , m 2 ( 2 K 1 ) ( K 1 ) 8 G p + α 3 2 m k , m 4 ( K 1 ) 64 ( 9 + 252 K 2 + 300 K 648 10 G p ) ]
and
σ M A I , k , m 2 = ( m k , m I p h , m ) 2 K 1 12 G p
In his analysis Pursley demonstrated that the amount of the MAI for an asynchronous spread spectrum system from K − 1 other active users is quantified as M A I ( K 1 ) / 3 G p [18] (Equation (3.63)). Therefore, the process gain Gp is tha main parameter for the pseudo-random (PN) code sequences that is taken into account. A perception of the system model for both directions of the forward and the reverse link is illustrated in Figure 1.

2.3. Spatial Diversity Receivers

A spatial diversity scheme is employed on the receivers’ side, along with a maximum ratio combining (MRC) scheme. Multiple copies of the same radio frequency (RF) CDMA signal are transmitted from an array of M optical laser sources towards a set of M photo-detector apertures at the receiver. The spacing between the laser sources at the transmitter and the receive apertures at the receiver is larger than the spatial coherence length of the atmospheric channel, i.e., a few centimeters, in order to achieve uncorrelated and independent diversity branches. Thus, the signals from each diversity branch are weighted with a gain factor Gm, which is proportional to the signal strength in the specific diversity branch. They are co-phased and summed coherently. The output of the MRC combiner is given as [2,20]:
C N I R k , M R C ( I ) = m = 1 M C N I R k , m ( I m ) = r ( t ) ,
The output of the MRC combiner is sent to a K-dimension matched filter receiver, where the desired signal of the 1st user, denoted as y1(n), is given in [18] (Equation (6.40)). The specific process can be implemented in both directions of the forward and the reverse link. The details of the spatial diversity is shown in Figure 2.

3. The M-Distribution with Nonzero Boresight Pointing Errors

In this section, the M distributed turbulence model with NZB PE is investigated. In [8], the probability density function (PDF) of the combined effects for a P2P link has been extracted as:
f c o m b , I m ( I m ) = ξ mod , m 2 A (   o r   ) 2 I m 1 j = 1 (   o r   ) a j (   o r   ) ( B (   o r   ) ) α m + j 2 ×               × G 1 , 3 3 , 0 ( B (   o r   ) I m A mod , m | ξ mod , m 2 + 1 ξ mod , m 2 ,   α m ,   β m )
where G p , q m , n [ ] stands for the Meijer G-function [21] (Equation (9.301)). The M-distribution is divided in two categories, which are determined by the value of the βm parameter [6]. In this work, we take into account only the case of βm being a natural number, i.e., β m . In this case, the summation in (6) takes the form ( ) [ . ] = j = 1 β [ . ] and the parameters A ( ) , a j ( ) and B ( ) are given as A ( ) = ( 2 α m α m / 2 ( γ m β m ) β m + α m 2 ) / ( γ m ( 2 + α m ) / 2 Γ ( α m ) ( γ m β m + Ω m ) β m + α m 2 ) a j ( ) = ( β m 1 j 1 ) 1 ( j 1 ) ! ( Ω m γ m ) j 1 ( α m β m ) j / 2 ( γ m β m + Ω m ) 1 j 2 , B ( ) = α m β m γ m β m + Ω m where ( β m j ) represents the binomial coefficient, [6,8].
The parameter ξmod,m related to the NZB PE effect is calculated as ξ mod , m = W z , e q , m / 2 σ mod , m with σmod,m being, [9]:
σ mod , m = ( 3 μ x , m 2 σ x , m 4 + 3 μ y , m 2 σ y , m 4 + σ x , m 6 + σ y , m 6 2 ) 1 / 6 ,
where μx,m, μy,m, σx,m and σy,m are parameters of the Beckmann PDF and correspond to the spatial jitters on the horizontal and the elevation axis (σx,m, σy,m) of each receiver and the fixed boresight displacements (μx,m, μy,m) of the optical beam center from the center of the mth receiver for the two vertical axis. The other parameter Amod,m, is given as, [9]:
A mod , m = A 0 , m exp ( 1 ξ mod , m 2 1 2 ξ x , m 2 1 2 ξ y , m 2 μ x , m 2 2 σ x , m 2 ξ x , m 2 μ y , m 2 2 σ y , m 2 ξ y , m 2 )
where ξ x , m = W z , e q , m / 2 σ x , m and ξ y , m = W z , e q , m / 2 σ y , m with Wz,eq,m being the equivalent beam radius at the receiver and is given through the expression W z , e q , m 2 = π e r f ( υ m ) W z , m 2 / 2 υ m exp ( υ m 2 ) . The parameter A0,m is the fraction of the collected power at r = 0 and equals to A 0 , m = [ e r f ( υ m ) ] 2 with υ m = π R m / 2 W z , m , where erf(.) represents the error function and Wz,m is the footprint of the Gaussian beam on each receiver plane [7,8,9,10,13]. The parameter Wz,m under strong fluctuation conditions equals W z , m = W 0 , m Θ 0 , m 2 + Λ 0 , m 2 1 + 1.63 σ R 12 / 5 Λ m with σ R 2 = 1.23 C n 2 k 7 / 6 L S , m 11 / 6 being the Rytov variance and Λ m = Λ 0 , m Θ 0 , m 2 + Λ 0 , m 2 , Θ 0 , m = 1 L S , m F 0 , m , Λ 0 , m = 2 L S , m k W 0 , m 2 , k = 2 π / λ , [5]. The parameter W 0 , m is the beam spot radius at each transmitter, L S , m is the link distance for each diversity link and F 0 , m is the phase front radius of curvature. In our case we assume a convergent beam with F 0 , m > 0 . Finally, the 1st order moment, i.e., the expected value, of the total normalized irradiance Im is calculated as E [ I m ] = 0 I m f c o m b , I m ( I m ) d I m and its closed-form expression, for β m , is given as [10]:
E [ I m ] = ξ mod , m 2 A mod , m ξ mod , m 2 + 1 ( γ m + Ω m )

4. Average Bit Error Rate Estimation

In this section, mathematical expressions are extracted for the estimation of the ABER metric of the kth user for the proposed spatially diverse link. In the specific CDMA RoFSO link with receivers’ diversity, each user’s signal is modulated with an L-QAM modulation. Gray code mapping is used at the transmitter and the conditional BER for the L-QAM constellation with the MRC output signal is given as, [22]:
P b , k , Q A M , M R C ( I m ) = 4 ( 1 L 1 / 2 ) log 2 ( L ) Q ( 3 L 1 m = 1 M C N I R k , m ( I m ) ) .
The ABER for each user, P b , k , M R C , A V , of the CDMA RoFSO link with diversity reception technique over M turbulence channels and NZB PE, is estimated by solving the following multiple integrals, [14,15]:
P b , k , A V = I f c o m b , I ( I ) P b , k , Q A M , M R C ( I ) d I
where the vector I = ( I 1 , I 2 , , I M ) consists of all the irradiance values for each link of the receivers diversity scheme [17].
Thus, taking into account the following approximation for the Q-function [23]:
Q ( x ) 1 12 [ exp ( x 2 2 ) + 2 exp ( 2 x 2 ) + 2 exp ( 2 x 2 3 ) ]
and by using the Equation (13), we conclude to the following integrals:
P b , k , A V 1 L 1 / 2 3 log 2 ( L ) [ 0 f c o m b , I m ( I m ) exp ( 3 m = 1 M C N I R k , m ( I m ) 2 ( 1 L ) ) d I m + + 2 0 f c o m b , I m ( I m ) exp ( 6 m = 1 M C N I R k , m ( I m ) 1 L ) d I m + 2 0 f c o m b , I m ( I m ) exp ( 2 m = 1 M C N I R k , m ( I m ) 1 L ) d I m ]
The irradiance values, Im, are statistically independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables. Due to the independency of the Im vectors, the M-fold integral in (16) is partitioned into a product of M one-dimensional integrals, [24]. As a result, we obtain the following expression for the estimation of the ABER:
P b , k , A V 1 L 1 / 2 3 log 2 ( L ) [ m = 1 M 0 f c o m b , I m ( I m ) exp ( 3 C N I R k , m ( I m ) 2 ( L 1 ) ) d I m +         + 2 m = 1 M 0 f c o m b , I m ( I m ) exp ( 6 C N I R k , m ( I m ) L 1 ) d I m +         + 2 m = 1 M 0 f c o m b , I m ( I m ) exp ( 2 C N I R k , m ( I m ) L 1 ) d I m ]
Next, we replace the exponential terms with the equivalent Meijer-G expressions for the exponential function, i.e., exp ( z ) = G 0 , 1 1 , 0 ( z | 0 ) , and we get:
P b , k , A V 1 L 1 / 2 3 log 2 ( L ) [ m = 1 M 0 f c o m b , I m ( I m ) G 0 , 1 1 , 0 ( 3 C N I R k , m ( I m ) 2 ( L 1 ) | 0 ) d I m +         + 2 m = 1 M 0 f c o m b , I m ( I m ) G 0 , 1 1 , 0 ( 6 C N I R k , m ( I m ) L 1 | 0 ) d I m +         + 2 m = 1 M 0 f c o m b , I m ( I m ) G 0 , 1 1 , 0 ( 2 C N I R k , m ( I m ) L 1 | 0 ) d I m ]
Substituting for the f c o m b , I m ( I m ) from (9) and using the formula from [25] (Equation (21)), we conclude to the following closed-form expression for the estimation of the ABER of each user on the CDMA RoFSO link with receivers’ diversity and L-QAM modulation:
P b , k , A V 1 L 1 / 2 3 log 2 ( L ) ( m = 1 M Ψ ( 3 2 , m ) + 2 m = 1 M Ψ ( 6 , m ) + 2 m = 1 M Ψ ( 2 , m ) )
with Ψ ( x , m ) = ξ mod , m 2 A ( ) 2 j = 1 β a j ( ) ( B ( ) ) α m + j 2 2 α m + j 2 2 π Ξ j ( x , m ) and Ξ j ( x , m ) = G 6 , 3 1 , 6 ( 16 x C N I R k , m , E X A mod , m 2 ( L 1 ) ( B ( ) E [ I ] ( ) ) 2 | 1 ξ mod , m 2 2 , 2 ξ mod , m 2 2 , 1 α m 2 , 2 α m 2 , 1 j 2 , 2 j 2 0 , ξ mod , m 2 2 , 1 ξ mod , m 2 2 ) .

5. Outage Probability Estimation

The OP for a P2P CDMA RoFSO link has been derived in [19] as:
P o u t , m , k = ξ mod , m 2 A ( ) 2 j = 1 β a j ( ) ( B ( ) ) α m + j 2 ×     × G 2 , 4 3 , 1 ( B ( ) E [ I m ] ( ) A mod , m C N I R k , m , t h C N I R k , m , E X | 1 ,   ξ mod , m 2 + 1 ξ mod , m 2 ,   α m ,   β m ,   0 )
Thus, the OP for the spatially diverse link with M statistically independent links is given as [16] (Equation (10)):
P o u t , k = m = 1 M P o u t , m , k .

6. Numerical Results

In this section, appropriate numerical results are illustrated, using the derived closed-form expressions (19) and (21). Several parameter values are chosen for the CDMA RoFSO link with receivers’ spatial diversity. Firstly, we assume two different cases for the atmospheric turbulence conditions. In the first case we assume strong irradiance fluctuations with the value of the Rytov variance equal to σ R 2 = 2.5 and in the second case we choose saturate turbulence conditions with σ R 2 = 25 . The aperture radius for each receiver is chosen equal to R m = 5   cm . The beam spot radius at each transmitter is W0,m = 3 cm, the operational wavelength λ = 1.55 μm, the link distance LS,m = 1.5 km and the phase front radius is F 0 , m = 500   m . The beam spot radius at each receiver aperture is calculated equal to W z , m = 9   cm for σ R 2 = 2.5 and W z , m = 25   cm for σ R 2 = 25 . For the CDMA RoFSO link we have the IMD3 coefficient equal to α3 = 1/3, Gp = 512, T = 300 K and RIN = −155 dB/Hz. The load resistance is RL = 50 Ω and <sk(t)> = 1. Also, the bandwidth for the forward link is chosen B = 20 MHz while for the reverse link is B = 10 MHz. For the influence of the PE effect, two cases are considered. For the first case, we select weak spatial jitters with normalized values at σx/R = 0.2 and σy/R = 0.1 and zero boresight displacement i.e., μx/R = 0 and μy/R = 0. In the second case, enhanced spatial jitters are considered, with σx/R = 0.5, σy/R = 0.2 and NZB displacement with μx/R = 0.1 and μy/R = 0.1.
The selected modulation scheme for the forward link is the 16-QAM, while for the reverse link is the QPSK. The ABER results for the CDMA RoFSO link with receivers’ diversity are illustrated among the Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6 wherein cases with M = 2 × 2 and M = 4 × 4 transceivers are shown. In Figure 2 and Figure 3 the ABER performance of the forward link is presented. In Figure 3 the weak PE case is depicted and in Figure 4 the strong PE impact is shown. It is deduced that an average received optical power per diversity branch (PR,m) above −10 dBm is required for the case of the forward link when M = 4 transceivers are used in order to attain an ABER at 10−4 even in the saturated turbulence conditions, i.e., σ R 2 = 25 . In the case of enhanced PE impact, i.e., Figure 3, the performance slightly worsens and the required PR,m increases proportionally.
The ABER performance for the reverse link of the CDMA RoFSO system is illustrated in Figure 5 and Figure 6. Firstly, as it is illustrated in both figures the simultaneous access of 80 users is feasible, especially when M = 4 transceivers are employed. In this case, the required PR,m is −15 dBm for ABER at 10−4 with saturated turbulence conditions. The case of enhanced PE is presented in Figure 4, where the performance exacerbates primarily in the case of σ R 2 = 2.5 .
Eventually, the OP outcomes are depicted in Figure 7 and Figure 8. It is worth noting that the outage performance estimation is implemented as a function of the CNIRk,m,EX, providing the advantage for performance assessment of both directions of the forward and the reverse link. Compared to the case of the P2P link, [18], the OP touches significantly lower values and the availability of the link increases. The threshold value for the CNIRk,th per diversity branch is fix equal to 10 dB. In the case of M = 4 × 4, the spatially diverse link performs very well even at saturated turbulence conditions with values of the CNIRk,EX per branch at 20 dB for both directions of the forward and the reverse link.

7. Conclusions

In this work, a RoFSO link for CDMA signal transmission with receivers’ diversity is studied. An array of M laser sources transmits towards an array of M receivers. Analytical closed-form mathematical expressions are obtained for the estimation of the ABER and the OP, which are used for the numerical performance estimation of the specific system for both, the forward and the reverse link. As it is presented, the CDMA RoFSO link operates adequately well with the spatial diversity scheme even in the worst case scenarios of saturated atmospheric turbulence conditions with enhanced PE influence. Also, in the derived numerical simulations a large number of users are considered that simultaneously access the network for the cases of the forward and the reverse link. The latter situation implies that the effects of IMD, MAI and clipping distortion are also immense.

Author Contributions

M.P.N. carried out the mathematical analysis and simulation results of the manuscript. H.E.N. confirmed their validity.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Uysal, M.; Capsoni, C.; Ghassemlooy, Z.; Boucouvalas, A.; Udvary, E. (Eds.) Optical Wireless Communications: An Emerging Technology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; ISBN 978-3-319-30201-0. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ghassemlooy, Z.; Popoola, W.; Rajbhandari, S. Optical Wireless Communications: System and Channel Modelling with Matlab; CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; ISBN 9781138074804. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kazaura, K.; Wakamori, K.; Matsumoto, M.; Higashino, T.; Tsukamoto, K.; Komaki, S. RoFSO: A universal platform for convergence of fiber and free space optical communication networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2010, 48, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fernando, X.N. Radio over Fiber for Wireless Communications: From Fundamentals to Advanced Topics; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; ISBN 978-3-319-30201-0. [Google Scholar]
  5. Andrews, L.C.; Philips, R.L. Laser Beam Propagation through Random Media; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2005; ISBN 9780819459480. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jurado-Navas, A.; Garrido-Balsells, J.M.; Paris, J.F.; Puerta-Notario, A. A unifying statistical model for atmospheric optical scintillation. In Numerical Simulation in Physics and Engineering; Intech Publisher: Rijeka, Croatia, 2011; pp. 181–206. [Google Scholar]
  7. Farid, A.; Hranilovic, S. Outage capacity optimization for free-space optical links with pointing errors. J. Lightw. Technol. 2007, 25, 1702–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jurado-Navas, A.; Garrido-Balsells, J.M.; Paris, J.F.; Castillo-Vasquez, M.; Puerta-Notario, A. Impact of pointing errors on the performance of generalized atmospheric optical channels. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 12550–12562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Boluda Ruiz, R.; Garcia-Zambrana, A.; Castillo-Vazquez, C.; Castillo-Vázquez, B. Novel approximation of misalignment fading modeled by Beckmann distribution on free-space optical links. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 22635–22649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ansari, I.S.; Yilmaz, F.; Alouini, M.S. Performance Analysis of Free-Space Optical Links over Málaga (M) Turbulence Channels with Pointing Errors. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2016, 15, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Varotsos, G.K.; Nistazakis, H.E.; Petkovic, M.I.; Djordjevic, G.T.; Tombras, G.S. SIMO optical wireless links with nonzero boresight pointing errors over M modeled turbulence channels. Opt. Commun. 2017, 403, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Muhammad, S.S.; Kohldolfer, P.; Leitgeb, E. Channel Modeling for Terrestrial Free Space Optical Links. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Transparent Optical Networks, Barcelona, Spain, 3–7 July 2005. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ales, P. Atmospheric effects on availability of free space optics systems. Opt. Eng. 2009, 48, 066001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Navidpour, S.M.; Uysal, M.; Kavehrad, M. BER performance of free space optical transmission with spatial diversity. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2007, 6, 2813–2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tsiftsis, T.A.; Sandalidis, H.G.; Karagiannidis, G.K.; Uysal, M. Optical wireless links with spatial diversity over strong atmospheric turbulence channels. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2009, 8, 951–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zixiong, W.; Wen-De, Z.; Songnian, F.; Chinlon, L. Performance comparison of different modulation formats over free-space optical (FSO) turbulence links with space diversity reception technique. IEEE Photonics J. 2009, 1, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nistazakis, H.E. A time-diversity scheme for wireless optical links over exponentially modeled turbulence channels. Optik 2013, 124, 1386–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abu-Rgheff, M.A. Introduction to CDMA Wireless Communications; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-0-7506-5252-0. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ninos, M.P.; Nistazakis, H.E.; Sandalidis, H.G.; Tombras, G.S. CDMA RoFSO links with nonzero boresight pointing errors over M turbulence channels. IEEE Photonics J. 2018, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Simon, Μ.Κ.; Alouini, M.S. Digital Communications over Fading Channels, 2nd ed.; Wiley-IEEE: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004; pp. 401–415. ISBN 978-0-471-64953-3. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gradshteyn, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 7th ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-0-7506-5252-0. [Google Scholar]
  22. Proakis, J.G.; Salehi, M. Digital Communications, 5th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2008; ISBN 978-0072957167. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sadhwani, D.; Yadav, R.N.; Aggrawal, S. Tighter bounds on the Gaussian Q function and its application in Nakagami-m fading channel. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2017, 6, 574–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alouini, M.S.; Simon, Μ.Κ. An MGF-based performance analysis of generalized selection combining over Rayleigh fading channels. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2000, 48, 401–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Adamchik, V.S.; Marichev, O.I. The Algorithm for calculating integrals of hypergeometric type function and its realization in reduce system. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, Tokyo, Japan, 20–24 August 1990; pp. 212–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The system model for the CDMA RoFSO system with spatial diversity for both directions of the forward and the reverse link. (SPL: splitter, MRC: maximum ratio combiner).
Figure 1. The system model for the CDMA RoFSO system with spatial diversity for both directions of the forward and the reverse link. (SPL: splitter, MRC: maximum ratio combiner).
Computation 06 00055 g001
Figure 2. Block diagram of the CDMA RoFSO system with receivers’ spatial diversity.
Figure 2. Block diagram of the CDMA RoFSO system with receivers’ spatial diversity.
Computation 06 00055 g002
Figure 3. The ABER performance for the forward CDMA RoFSO link with receivers’ diversity, over strong turbulence and weak PE impact for different values of the number of users K.
Figure 3. The ABER performance for the forward CDMA RoFSO link with receivers’ diversity, over strong turbulence and weak PE impact for different values of the number of users K.
Computation 06 00055 g003
Figure 4. The ABER performance for the forward CDMA RoFSO link with receivers’ diversity, over strong turbulence and enhanced PE impact for different values of the number of users K.
Figure 4. The ABER performance for the forward CDMA RoFSO link with receivers’ diversity, over strong turbulence and enhanced PE impact for different values of the number of users K.
Computation 06 00055 g004
Figure 5. The ABER performance for the reverse CDMA RoFSO link with receivers’ diversity, over strong turbulence and weak PE impact for different values of the number of users K.
Figure 5. The ABER performance for the reverse CDMA RoFSO link with receivers’ diversity, over strong turbulence and weak PE impact for different values of the number of users K.
Computation 06 00055 g005
Figure 6. The ABER performance for the reverse CDMA RoFSO link with receivers’ diversity, over strong turbulence and enhanced PE impact for different values of the number of users K.
Figure 6. The ABER performance for the reverse CDMA RoFSO link with receivers’ diversity, over strong turbulence and enhanced PE impact for different values of the number of users K.
Computation 06 00055 g006
Figure 7. The OP for the CDMA RoFSO link with receivers’ diversity for both directions, over strong turbulence and weak PE impact as a function of the CNIRk,EX per branch.
Figure 7. The OP for the CDMA RoFSO link with receivers’ diversity for both directions, over strong turbulence and weak PE impact as a function of the CNIRk,EX per branch.
Computation 06 00055 g007
Figure 8. The OP for the CDMA RoFSO link with receivers’ diversity for both directions, over strong turbulence and strong PE impact as a function of the CNIRk,EX per branch.
Figure 8. The OP for the CDMA RoFSO link with receivers’ diversity for both directions, over strong turbulence and strong PE impact as a function of the CNIRk,EX per branch.
Computation 06 00055 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ninos, M.P.; Nistazakis, H.E. Spatial Diversity for CDMA RoFSO Links over M Turbulence Channels with Nonzero Boresight Pointing Errors. Computation 2018, 6, 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation6040055

AMA Style

Ninos MP, Nistazakis HE. Spatial Diversity for CDMA RoFSO Links over M Turbulence Channels with Nonzero Boresight Pointing Errors. Computation. 2018; 6(4):55. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation6040055

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ninos, Michalis P., and Hector E. Nistazakis. 2018. "Spatial Diversity for CDMA RoFSO Links over M Turbulence Channels with Nonzero Boresight Pointing Errors" Computation 6, no. 4: 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation6040055

APA Style

Ninos, M. P., & Nistazakis, H. E. (2018). Spatial Diversity for CDMA RoFSO Links over M Turbulence Channels with Nonzero Boresight Pointing Errors. Computation, 6(4), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation6040055

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop