Next Article in Journal
PEEK Biomaterial in Long-Term Provisional Implant Restorations: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Is There a Better Biomaterial for Dental Implants than Titanium?—A Review and Meta-Study Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Engineering Nanopatterned Structures to Orchestrate Macrophage Phenotype by Cell Shape
Previous Article in Special Issue
Properties of A Model Self-Healing Microcapsule-Based Dental Composite Reinforced with Silica Nanoparticles
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JFB
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/jfb13010032
jfb-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dental Poly(methyl methacrylate)-Based Resin Containing a Nanoporous Silica Filler

by
Kentaro Hata
1,2,
Hiroshi Ikeda
2,*,
Yuki Nagamatsu
2,
Chihiro Masaki
1,
Ryuji Hosokawa
1 and
Hiroshi Shimizu
2
1
Division of Oral Reconstruction and Rehabilitation, Department of Oral Functions, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu 803-8580, Japan
2
Division of Biomaterials, Department of Oral Functions, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu 803-8580, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13(1), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13010032
Submission received: 17 February 2022 / Revised: 11 March 2022 / Accepted: 11 March 2022 / Published: 15 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Dental Biomaterials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)-based resins have been conventionally used in dental prostheses owing to their good biocompatibility. However, PMMA-based resins have relatively poor mechanical properties. In the present study, a novel nanoporous silica filler was developed and introduced into PMMA-based resins to improve their mechanical properties. The filler was prepared by sintering a green body composed of silica and an organic binder, followed by grinding to a fine powder and subsequent silanization. The filler was added to photocurable PMMA-based resin, which was prepared from MMA, PMMA, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, and a photo-initiator. The filler was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction analysis, nitrogen sorption porosimetry, and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. The PMMA-based resins were characterized by SEM and FT-IR, and the mechanical properties (Vickers hardness, flexural modulus, and flexural strength) and physicochemical properties (water sorption and solubility) were evaluated. The results suggested that the filler consisted of microparticles with nanopores. The filler at 23 wt % was well dispersed in the PMMA-based resin matrix. The mechanical and physicochemical properties of the PMMA-based resin improved significantly with the addition of the developed filler. Therefore, such filler-loaded PMMA-based resins are potential candidates for improving the strength and durability of polymer-based crown and denture base.

1. Introduction

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-based resins are widely used in dental applications because of their excellent biocompatibility, stable physicochemical properties, easy manipulation, low cost, and appropriate aesthetics [1,2,3]. PMMA-based resins are commonly used for dental applications, such as denture bases, denture teeth, temporary crowns, provisional restorations, adhesives, and orthodontic retainers. However, clinical problems related to the use of PMMA-based resins include fracture and wear owing to their insufficient mechanical properties [4,5]. Improving the mechanical properties of PMMA-based resins is a critical issue for their long-term use in the oral environment without early failures.
To improve the mechanical properties, many studies have introduced fillers or fibers into a PMMA-based resin matrix [6,7]. A systematic review paper suggested that the addition of filler to the resin matrix can increase mechanical properties such as flexural strength, flexural (elastic) modulus, and fracture toughness [7]. For instance, the addition of microcrystalline cellulose at 5 wt % reinforced the PMMA-based resin in terms of increasing the flexural strength and modulus [8]. A double-modified organoclay was incorporated in the PMMA matrix at 0.5 wt %, resulting in increased flexural strength, flexural modulus, and fracture toughness [9]. Silanized alumina micro-particles with 0.1 wt % increased the flexural strength of PMMA-based resin [10]. ZrO2 nanotubes were added to a PMMA-based resin, which increased its flexural strength [11]. Furthermore, the addition of silanized silica nanoparticles increased the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and fracture toughness of the PMMA-based resin [12]. Thus, the addition of fillers at an appropriate amount can reinforce the mechanical properties of PMMA-based resins.
However, the addition of large amounts of fillers often has adverse effects on the mechanical properties of PMMA-based resins. Excess filler (usually above approximately 5 wt %) degrades the mechanical properties of the PMMA-based resin, because the filler forms aggregates and voids in the resin matrix [7]. For instance, the flexural strength of heat-polymerized PMMA-based resin increased with increasing nano-filler (silica, alumina, and zirconia) content up to 1 wt %, and decreased above 5 wt % [13]. The flexural strength of the PMMA-based resin containing 5 wt % silica nanoparticles was lower than that of the pure resin [14]. The flexural strength of a PMMA-based resin increased with the addition of fluoridated glass filler up to 5 wt %, and then decreased [15].
To overcome this issue, the present study focused on the development of porous fillers to improve the mechanical properties of PMMA-based resins. Porous filler containing continuous internal pores can form a mechanically interlocked structure at the interface between the infiltrated resin and filler surface [16]. Porous fillers have the potential to avoid degradation of the properties of the PMMA-based resin when a large amount of filler is added. In resin composites, some types of porous fillers have been introduced to improve the mechanical and physicochemical properties of resins [17,18,19,20,21]. For instance, a nanoporous silica filler prepared by thermal sintering increased the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and fracture toughness of copoly(bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA)/Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA)) by adding 70 wt % of filler [19]. A wrinkled mesoporous silica improved the mechanical properties, including the flexural strength, flexural modulus, compressive strength, and Vickers microhardness of copoly(Bis-GMA/TEGDMA) [20]. A dendritic porous silica filler added at 36 wt % showed the best reinforcing effect on the flexural strength, compressive strength, and work of fracture of copoly(Bis-GMA/TEGDMA) [21]. Similarly, it is expected that porous fillers have the potential to improve the mechanical properties of PMMA-based resins.
This study aimed to develop a novel nanoporous filler to enhance the mechanical properties of a PMMA-based resin. First, we demonstrate the preparation of a nanoporous filler possessing highly surface area. Then, the resultant filler was loaded with 23 wt % (the upper limit before deterioration in the properties was observed) into a photocurable PMMA-based resin, and its mechanical and physicochemical properties were examined to evaluate the feasibility of its use in dental restorative materials.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The reagents used for the preparation of all samples are listed in Table 1.

2.2. Preparation of Porous-Silica Filler

SiO2 nanoparticles (6 g) were dispersed in distilled water (54 g) at pH 3 by ultrasonication for 1 h. The resultant SiO2 suspension was mixed with 10 wt % poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) solution (11.4 g) using a magnetic stirrer at 30 °C for 24 h. The obtained slurry was poured into a container and dried in an oven at 30 °C for 7 days. The resultant green body was heat treated in an electric furnace at 600 °C for 3 h in air to burn out the PVA binder. The heat-treated body was pre-sintered at 950 °C for 1 h in air. The obtained monolith was crushed using a mortar and pestle. The resultant coarse powder was ground and simultaneously silanized in an ethanol medium containing 1 wt % of γ-MPTS using a ball-milling device with zirconia balls. The ground powder was dried in an oven at 80 °C for 24 h and then sieved through a 500 μm mesh. Finally, a silanized nanoporous silica filler was obtained.

2.3. Characterization of Nanoporous Silica Filler

The microstructure of the filler was observed using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; S-4300, Hitachi High-Tech Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Prior to observation, the sample was coated with platinum via sputtering. The observation conditions were an acceleration voltage of 5 kV and a working distance of 15 mm.
The surface area and pore size distribution of the filler were estimated using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method and the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method, respectively, using nitrogen sorption–desorption curves measured by a porosimeter (QuadraSorb SI, Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL, USA).
The crystal phase of the filler was determined using X-ray diffraction (XRD; RINT 2100VLR/PC, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) with a Cu Kα X-ray source (λ = 1.5406 Å).
The silanization of the filler was examined by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) analysis using a spectrometer (IRSpirit, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) with a diffuse reflectance unit with a resolution of 4 cm−1.

2.4. Preparation of the Filler-Loaded PMMA-Based Resin

MMA, PMMA, and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) were mixed at a weight ratio of 63:30:7 using a magnetic stirrer at 80 °C for 30 min. The resultant resin mixture was further mixed with the prepared filler (23 wt % relative to the resin) by ultrasonication for 30 min. Subsequently, the photo-initiator phenylbis (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide (BAPO, 0.5 wt %) was dissolved into the mixture using a stirrer. As a result, the liquid state of the filler-loaded PMMA-based resin was obtained. The resultant resin was poured into a transparent silicone mold with dimensions of 15 mm × 5 mm × 1.5 mm and light-cured using a light-irradiator (α-LIGHT II N, J. Morita Corp., Osaka, Japan) for 3 min. The cured resin was polished using emery paper up to #2000 and formed into a bar shape (14 mm × 4 mm × 1.2 mm) according to the ISO standard 10477: 2018 [22]. The bar-shaped samples were used for the following characterization experiments.

2.5. Characterization of the PMMA-Based Resins

The microstructure of the PMMA-based resin was observed using SEM under the same conditions as mentioned above. FT-IR analysis was conducted for the PMMA-based resins using a spectrometer with an attenuated total reflection (ATR) unit. The degree of conversion of the C=C bonds in the samples was estimated from the FT-IR spectra. In the FT-IR spectra, two characteristic bands at 1637 cm−1 (stretching of carbon double bond C=C) and 1720 cm−1 (stretching of carbonyl group C=O) before and after polymerization of the sample were used to calculate the degree of conversion using the following equation [23]:
Degree   of   conversion   ( % ) = ( 1 − [ A ( C = C ) / A ( C = O ) ] p o l y m e r [ A ( C = C ) / A ( C = O ) ] m o n o m e r ) × 100
where A(C=C) and A(C=O) are the band intensities.
The mechanical properties of the PMMA-based resins were characterized by flexural strength, flexural modulus, and Vickers hardness tests according to the procedures described in a previous study [24]. The flexural strength and modulus were obtained by three-point bending tests using a universal testing machine (AGS-H, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/s and a support span of 12 mm. After the three-point bending tests, the fractured samples were used for the Vickers hardness test. Each test was performed ten times for each group (n = 10).
The physicochemical properties (water sorption and water solubility) of the PMMA-based resins were measured using the procedures described in the ISO standard 10477: 2018 [22]. The sample was kept in an oven at 37 °C for seven days under dry conditions (initial weight, m1). The dried sample was immersed in distilled water at 37 °C for seven days (final weight, m2). The immersed sample was dried again in an oven for seven days (dried weight, m3). The following equations were used to calculate water sorption (ρws) and solubility (ρs1):
ρ ws = ( m 2 − m 3 ) V
ρ s 1 = ( m 1 − m 3 ) V
where V is the volume of the rectangular bar-shaped sample. Ten measurements were obtained for each group (n = 10).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The results of the degree of conversion, mechanical properties, and physicochemical properties were compared between the PMMA-based resins with and without fillers by means of Student’s t-test using statistical software (EZR, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan). The significance level was set to 0.01 for all results.

3. Results

3.1. Nano-Porous Silica Filler

The prepared filler was composed of irregular particles several micrometers in size and contained the nanopores (Figure 1a). The pore size and surface area were obtained from nitrogen sorption–desorption measurements. The BJH method gave the pore size distribution of the filler (Figure 1b). The pore size was in the range of approximately 5–30 nm and the mean diameter was 13.2 nm. The BET surface area of the filler was 61.3 m2/g. The crystal phase of the filler was determined using XRD (Figure 1c). The broad peak at ≈20° was attributed to the amorphous silica phase. In addition, sharp peaks were assigned to the cristobalite crystalline phase (PDF #39-1425). This XRD result suggests that the filler contained both amorphous and crystalline phases. The silanization of the filler was confirmed by FT-IR analysis in the range of 1600–1800 cm−1 (Figure 1d), where the characteristic peaks of the silane coupling agent are located [25,26,27]. The peak at approximately 1700 cm−1 was assigned to the stretching vibration of the carbonyl groups of the silane coupling agent [25,26,27]. Furthermore, the band at 1720 cm−1 was assigned to the hydrogen-bonded carbonyl groups of the silane coupling agent with the silanol groups on the silica [25,26,27]. The FT-IR results suggest that the filler surface was successfully coated with the silane coupling agent.

3.2. Filler-Loaded PMMA-Based Resin

The PMMA-based resin after curing had a homogeneous morphology without any aggregates or voids (Figure 2a). The filler-loaded resin was a resin–ceramic composite with dispersed filler in a resin matrix (Figure 2a). Figure 2b shows FT-IR spectra of the PMMA-based resins with and without fillers. The FT-IR spectrum of the PMMA-based resin had characteristic peaks attributed to PMMA and poly-EGDMA, suggesting that the resin consisted of copoly(MMA/EGDMA) [28]. The peaks at 2900–3000 cm−1 were attributed to C–H stretching vibrations, 1250–1000 cm−1 to C–O stretching vibrations, and 950–650 cm−1 to C–H bending vibrations. The FT-IR spectrum of the filler-loaded PMMA-based resin also had characteristic peaks from silica, with a peak at ≈800 cm−1 for the Si–O–Si symmetric vibration, and a peak at ≈1020 cm−1 for the Si–O–Si asymmetric vibration [29,30]. Furthermore, the degree of conversion for each sample was estimated from the FT-IR spectra using the characteristic peaks of C=C bands at 1637 cm−1 and C=O bands at 1720 cm−1 for methacrylates. The calculated degree of conversion was 88.9 ± 1.8 and 90.1 ± 2.0% for PMMA-based resins with and without filler, respectively (Figure 2c). As there was no significant difference between these values, filler addition did not affect the degree of conversion of the PMMA-based resin.
The mechanical properties of PMMA-based resins are shown in Figure 3. The flexural strength, flexural modulus, and Vickers hardness values of the filler-loaded resin were significantly higher than those of the pure resin. Hence, the addition of the filler improved the mechanical properties of the PMMA-based resin. Figure 4 shows the physicochemical properties (water sorption and solubility) of the PMMA-based resins. There was no significant difference between the water sorption values. No water solubility was observed for the filler-loaded PMMA-based resin, whereas little solubility was confirmed for the pure resin. Therefore, filler addition improved the mechanical and physicochemical properties of the PMMA-based resins.

4. Discussion

The nanoporous silica filler was obtained via sintering, grinding, and silanization. During the sintering process, monolithic porous silica was produced by sintering the green body, containing the silica nanoparticles and PVA binder. During sintering, the PVA binder of the green body thermally decomposed, resulting in the formation of continuous pores in the body. Further details were reported in our previous study [31]. This previous study revealed that the porous structure can be controlled by the sintering temperature and time [31]; the pore volume and surface area decreased with increasing sintering temperature or time. Excessive sintering yielded a dense monolith with no pores, while insufficient sintering yielded a fragile monolith with poor consolidation of the nanoparticles. The sintering conditions were optimized to achieve a sufficiently porous and strong silica monolith. Then, the porous silica monolith was ground into a fine powder. Although the fabricated filler had microscale particles, it had a large surface area owing to the internal nanopores. This unique characteristic of the nanoporous filler significantly differs from that of conventional micro- or nano-fillers used in dental resin composites [32,33,34]. Furthermore, the present filler differs from the previously reported thermally sintered nanoporous silica filler in terms of its porous structure; the surface area of the present filler (61.3 m2/g) is eight times higher than that of an existing filler (8.4 m2/g) [19].
The resin matrix of the filler-loaded PMMA-based resin was prepared from appropriate amounts of pre-polymerized PMMA powder, MMA, EGDMA cross-linker, and BAPO photo-initiator. This system is similar to the powder–liquid mixtures used in many commercial self-cured acrylic resin systems [35,36]. In our system, the EGDMA cross-linker creates a three-dimensional polymer network with the MMA monomer via free-radical polymerization by light irradiation [37]. The pre-polymerized PMMA powder facilitated curing of the resin monomer. In our preliminary experiments, the resin without EGDMA and PMMA powder did not cure under light irradiation. Hence, EGDMA and PMMA powders are essential components for the present PMMA-based resin. The BAPO photo-initiator is commonly used for free-radical photopolymerization in biomedical resin-based applications owing to its low cytotoxicity and high absorption coefficient under ultraviolet light [38]. A small amount of initiator achieved an efficient degree of conversion in the PMMA-based resins. The degree of conversion reached ≈90% in the PMMA-based resins, regardless of filler addition. This suggests that the infiltrated resin inside the filler particles can be polymerized under light irradiation. The degree of conversion for the PMMA-based resins is close to that of commercial heat-polymerized PMMA-based resin (≈92–97%) [39], whereas it is higher than that of commercial photo-polymerized resin composites for dental bulk-filled applications (≈30–80%) [40]. Hence, PMMA-based resins are considered acceptable as photocurable resins.
The PMMA-based resin contained 23 wt % filler. In this experiment, we examined the upper concentration limit at which the filler was able to disperse into the resin matrix without forming agglomerates or voids. We also prepared a filler-loaded PMMA-based resin using a non-silanized silica filler. In this case, the filler formed aggregates in the resin matrix at concentrations below 5 wt %. This means that silanization of the filler is essential and effective for homogeneous dispersion of the filler in the resin matrix. The present filler concentration (23 wt %) is higher than those of the previous filler-loaded PMMA-based resins listed in a review paper on filler-loaded PMMA-based resins [7]. The fillers often easily form aggregates in the resin matrix, and the upper limit of the filler load is approximately 5 wt % to avoid degradation of the mechanical properties, even when silanization of the filler is performed. In fact, we tried to use the original fumed silica nanoparticles as the filler for the PMMA-based resin. However, homogeneous filler-loaded resin was not successfully fabricated because the fumed silica formed aggregates in the resin matrix, even at a concentration below 5 wt %, owing to their high surface area of 300 m2/g. In contrast, the present micro-sized filler had a hierarchical structure containing nanopores. This unique microstructure of the filler allows the resin matrix to penetrate the continuous nanopores via capillary forces, leading to good wettability between the filler and resin matrix. This inhibits the aggregation of the fillers and void formation in the resin matrix.
The mechanical properties of the pure PMMA-based resin are comparable to those of commercial self-cured PMMA-based resins [41]. The addition of the filler significantly increased the mechanical properties of the PMMA-based resin. In particular, the flexural modulus and Vickers hardness of the filler-loaded PMMA-based resin were twice those of the pure PMMA-based resin. These improvements in the mechanical properties are notable in comparison with previous studies on filler-loaded PMMA-based resins. For instance, nanosized ZrO2 filler added at 7 wt % increased the Vickers hardness only marginally, from 17.3 to 19.6 [42]. In another study, the addition of aluminum borate whiskers at 20 wt %, increased the Vickers hardness of the resin from 17.78 to 20.58 [43].
The physicochemical properties of the PMMA-based resin also improved with the addition of the filler. This suggests that the filler particles were well dispersed in the resin matrix and chemically bonded to each other. A previous study suggested that the water solubility and sorption of resin composites are affected by the material homogeneity [44], where highly homogeneous resin–filler composites have lower water solubility and sorption. In addition, the silane coupling agent on the filler surface can improve the bonding between the filler and resin matrix, thereby enhancing the mechanical and physicochemical properties [45,46]. The mechanical and physicochemical properties of filler-loaded PMMA-based resin meet the criteria of ISO standard for polymer-based crown [22]. Overall, the filler-loaded PMMA-based resin is considered suitable for use in dental applications, such as temporary crowns, provisional restorations, and denture bases. However, there is scope for further assessment of the cytotoxicity of PMMA-based reins to confirm their biocompatibility using human gingival fibroblasts and gingival keratinocytes [47] and in vivo allergy tests [48]. Since TEGDMA has a risk of disruption of vital cell functions, the cytotoxicity due to the unpolymerized monomers will be examined further [49,50].
The present study demonstrated that the developed nanoporous silica filler can improve the mechanical and physicochemical properties of PMMA-based resins. In addition, the nanoporous silica filler has potential applications in other resins, such as multifunctional resins, urethane dimethacrylate, and bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate. Multifunctional resins have been widely used as resin composites for dental restorative materials owing to their excellent mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Commercial resin composites are generally loaded with nano- or micro-sized fillers to improve their mechanical properties [51]. The nanoporous silica fillers further improved the mechanical properties of the resin composites. The filler size and porous structure would be controlled to enable good dispersion in the resin matrix to achieve desirable properties. The potential applications of the newly developed filler will be examined in the future to expand the use of nanoporous fillers in clinical applications.

5. Conclusions

A nanoporous silica filler was prepared via a sintering process. The filler was incorporated in the photocurable PMMA-based resin to improve the mechanical and physicochemical properties. The filler-loaded PMMA-based resin has the potential for use in dental restorative materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.I. and H.S.; data curation, K.H. and H.I.; formal analysis, K.H. and C.M.; funding acquisition, H.I. and H.S.; investigation, K.H., H.I. and Y.N.; methodology, K.H. and H.I.; project administration, H.S.; resources, K.H. and C.M.; software, K.H. and Y.N.; supervision, H.I. and H.S.; validation, K.H., H.I. and R.H.; visualization, R.H.; writing—original draft, K.H., H.I. and Y.N.; writing—review and editing, C.M. and R.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers 20K21685 and the Japanese Association for Dental Science, sponsored research 2020-B-1.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gautam, R.; Singh, R.D.; Sharma, V.P.; Siddhartha, R.; Chand, P.; Kumar, R. Biocompatibility of polymethylmethacrylate resins used in dentistry. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2012, 100, 1444–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zafar, M.S. Prosthodontic applications of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA): An update. Polymers 2020, 12, 2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pituru, S.M.; Greabu, M.; Totan, A.; Imre, M.; Pantea, M.; Spinu, T.; Tancu, A.M.C.; Popoviciu, N.O.; Stanescu, I.I.; Ionescu, E. A review on the biocompatibility of PMMA-based dental materials for interim prosthetic restorations with a glimpse into their modern manufacturing techniques. Materials 2020, 13, 2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Alhotan, A.; Yates, J.; Zidan, S.; Haider, J.; Silikas, N. Assessing fracture toughness and impact strength of PMMA reinforced with nano-particles and fibre as advanced denture base materials. Materials 2021, 14, 4127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cascione, M.; De Matteis, V.; Pellegrino, P.; Albanese, G.; De Giorgi, M.L.; Paladini, F.; Corsalini, M.; Rinaldi, R. Improvement of PMMA dental matrix performance by addition of titanium dioxide nanoparticles and clay nanotubes. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gad, M.M.; Fouda, S.M.; Al-Harbi, F.A.; Napankangas, R.; Raustia, A. PMMA denture base material enhancement: A review of fiber, filler, and nanofiller addition. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 3801–3812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Aldegheishem, A.; AlDeeb, M.; Al-Ahdal, K.; Helmi, M.; Alsagob, E.I. Influence of reinforcing agents on the mechanical properties of denture base resin: A systematic review. Polymers 2021, 13, 3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rahaman Ali, A.A.A.; John, J.; Mani, S.A.; El-Seedi, H.R. Effect of thermal cycling on flexural properties of microcrystalline cellulose-reinforced denture base acrylic resins. J. Prosthodont. 2020, 29, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shakeri, F.; Nodehi, A.; Atai, M. PMMA/double-modified organoclay nanocomposites as fillers for denture base materials with improved mechanical properties. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2019, 90, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chaijareenont, P.; Takahashi, H.; Nishiyama, N.; Arksornnukit, M. Effect of different amounts of 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane on the flexural properties and wear resistance of alumina reinforced PMMA. Dent. Mater. J. 2012, 31, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Yu, W.; Wang, X.; Tang, Q.; Guo, M.; Zhao, J. Reinforcement of denture base PMMA with ZrO2 nanotubes. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2014, 32, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jiangkongkho, P.; Arksornnukit, M.; Takahashi, H. The synthesis, modification, and application of nanosilica in polymethyl methacrylate denture base. Dent. Mater. J. 2018, 37, 582–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Karci, M.; Demir, N.; Yazman, S. Evaluation of flexural strength of different denture base materials reinforced with different nanoparticles. J. Prosthodont. 2019, 28, 572–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cevik, P.; Yildirim-Bicer, A.Z. The effect of silica and prepolymer nanoparticles on the mechanical properties of denture base acrylic resin. J. Prosthodont. 2018, 27, 763–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Al-Bakri, I.A.; Swain, M.V.; Naoum, S.J.; Al-Omari, W.M.; Martin, E.; Ellakwa, A. Fluoride release, recharge and flexural properties of polymethylmethacrylate containing fluoridated glass fillers. Aust. Dent. J. 2014, 59, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, J.; Zhang, H.; Sun, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, W.; Su, B.; Li, S. The development of filler morphology in dental resin composites: A review. Materials 2021, 14, 5612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zandinejad, A.A.; Atai, M.; Pahlevan, A. The effect of ceramic and porous fillers on the mechanical properties of experimental dental composites. Dent. Mater. 2006, 22, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Samuel, S.P.; Li, S.; Mukherjee, I.; Guo, Y.; Patel, A.C.; Baran, G.; Wei, Y. Mechanical properties of experimental dental composites containing a combination of mesoporous and nonporous spherical silica as fillers. Dent. Mater. 2009, 25, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Atai, M.; Pahlavan, A.; Moin, N. Nano-porous thermally sintered nano silica as novel fillers for dental composites. Dent. Mater. 2012, 28, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, R.; Habib, E.; Zhu, X.X. Synthesis of wrinkled mesoporous silica and its reinforcing effect for dental resin composites. Dent. Mater. 2017, 33, 1139–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, H.; Liu, H.; Wang, R.; Jiang, X.; Zhu, M. Size-controllable synthesis of dendritic porous silica as reinforcing fillers for dental composites. Dent. Mater. 2021, 37, 961–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. ISO 10477: 2018; Dentistry—Polymer-Based Crown and Veneering Materials. International Organization for Standarization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020.
  23. Viljanen, E.K.; Skrifvars, M.; Vallittu, P.K. Degree of conversion of a copolymer of an experimental monomer and methyl methacrylate for dental applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 93, 1908–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hata, K.; Ikeda, H.; Nagamatsu, Y.; Masaki, C.; Hosokawa, R.; Shimizu, H. Development of dental poly(methyl methacrylate)-based resin for stereolithography additive manufacturing. Polymers 2021, 13, 4435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Miller, D.J.; Ishida, H. Quantitative monomolecular coverage of inorganic particulates by methacryl-functional silanes. Surf. Sci. 1984, 148, 601–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Q.; Ding, J.; Chambers, D.E.; Debnath, S.; Wunder, S.L.; Baran, G.R. Filler-coupling agent-matrix interactions in silica/polymethylmethacrylate composites. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2001, 57, 384–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sideridou, I.D.; Karabela, M.M. Effect of the amount of 3-methacyloxypropyltrimethoxysilane coupling agent on physical properties of dental resin nanocomposites. Dent. Mater. 2009, 25, 1315–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wnuczek, K.; Puszka, A.; Klapiszewski, L.; Podkoscielna, B. Preparation, thermal, and thermo-mechanical characterization of polymeric blends based on di(meth)acrylate monomers. Polymers 2021, 13, 878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Uchino, T.; Aboshi, A.; Kohara, S.; Ohishi, Y.; Sakashita, M.; Aoki, K. Microscopic structure of nanometer-sized silica particles. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 69, 155409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yamada, T.; Nakajima, M.; Suemoto, T.; Uchino, T. Formation and photoluminescence characterization of transparent silica glass prepared by solid-phase reaction of nanometer-sized silica particles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 12973–12979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ikeda, H.; Nagamatsu, Y.; Shimizu, H. Preparation of silica-poly(methyl methacrylate) composite with a nanoscale dual-network structure and hardness comparable to human enamel. Dent. Mater. 2019, 35, 893–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ferracane, J.L. Resin composite—State of the art. Dent. Mater. 2011, 27, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Habib, E.; Wang, R.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, M.; Zhu, X.X. Inorganic fillers for dental resin composites: Present and future. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Schmalz, G.; Hickel, R.; van Landuyt, K.L.; Reichl, F.X. Nanoparticles in dentistry. Dent. Mater. 2017, 33, 1298–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Saen-Isara, T.; Dechkunakorn, S.; Anuwongnukroh, N.; Srikhirin, T.; Tanodekaew, S.; Wichai, W. Influence of the cross-linking agent on mechanical properties of PMMA powder with compromised particle morphology. Int. Orthod. 2017, 15, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nateghi, M.; Negahdari, R.; Molaei, S.; Barzegar, A.; Bohlouli, S. Comparison of the accuracy of fixture-level implant impression making with different splinting techniques. Int. J. Dent. 2021, 2021, 2959055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Andrzejewska, E. Photopolymerization kinetics of multifunctional monomers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2001, 26, 605–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tomal, W.; Ortyl, J. Water-soluble photoinitiators in biomedical applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Leao, R.S.; de Moraes, S.L.D.; Aquino, K.; Isolan, C.P.; Casado, B.; Montes, M. Effect of pressure, post-pressing time, and polymerization cycle on the degree of conversion of thermoactivated acrylic resin. Int. J. Dent. 2018, 2018, 5743840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zorzin, J.; Maier, E.; Harre, S.; Fey, T.; Belli, R.; Lohbauer, U.; Petschelt, A.; Taschner, M. Bulk-fill resin composites: Polymerization properties and extended light curing. Dent. Mater. 2015, 31, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Alhavaz, A.; Rezaei Dastjerdi, M.; Ghasemi, A.; Ghasemi, A.; Alizadeh Sahraei, A. Effect of untreated zirconium oxide nanofiller on the flexural strength and surface hardness of autopolymerized interim fixed restoration resins. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2017, 29, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alhotan, A.; Yates, J.; Zidan, S.; Haider, J.; Silikas, N. Flexural strength and hardness of filler-reinforced PMMA targeted for denture base application. Materials 2021, 14, 2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, B.; Lin, K.; Chang, J. Mechanical and thermal properties of denture PMMA reinforced with silanized aluminum borate whiskers. Dent. Mater. J. 2012, 31, 903–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Miettinen, V.M.; Vallittu, P.K. Release of residual methyl methacrylate into water from glass fibre-poly(methyl methacrylate) composite used in dentures. Biomaterials 1997, 18, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kondo, Y.; Takagaki, T.; Okuda, M.; Ikeda, M.; Kadoma, Y.; Yamauchi, J.; Okada, K.; Sadr, A.; Nikaido, T.; Tagami, J. Effect of PMMA filler particles addition on the physical properties of resin composite. Dent. Mater. J. 2010, 29, 596–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Alhotan, A.; Yates, J.; Zidan, S.; Haider, J.; Jurado, C.A.; Silikas, N. Behaviour of PMMA resin composites incorporated with nanoparticles or fibre following prolonged water storage. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Alamoush, R.A.; Kushnerev, E.; Yates, J.M.; Satterthwaite, J.D.; Silikas, N. Response of two gingival cell lines to CAD/CAM composite blocks. Dent. Mater. 2020, 36, 1214–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Jung, H.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, J.H.; Park, K.J.; Lee, J.J.; Park, H.S. A feasibility study for 3D-printed poly(methyl methacrylate)-resin tracheostomy tube using a hamster cheek pouch model. In Vivo 2020, 34, 1749–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Krifka, S.; Petzel, C.; Bolay, C.; Hiller, K.A.; Spagnuolo, G.; Schmalz, G.; Schweikl, H. Activation of stress-regulated transcription factors by triethylene glycol dimethacrylate monomer. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 1787–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Krifka, S.; Hiller, K.A.; Bolay, C.; Petzel, C.; Spagnuolo, G.; Reichl, F.X.; Schmalz, G.; Schweikl, H. Function of MAPK and downstream transcription factors in monomer-induced apoptosis. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 740–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Chen, M.H. Update on dental nanocomposites. J. Dent. Res. 2010, 89, 549–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jfb 13 00032 g001 550
Figure 1. Characteristics of the porous silica filler: (a) SEM images for the filler with ×3000 magnification and for the filler surface with ×50,000 magnification (inset image), (b) pore size distribution obtained by the nitrogen desorption measurement, (c) XRD pattern, and (d) FT-IR spectra of the fillers with and without silanization.
Figure 1. Characteristics of the porous silica filler: (a) SEM images for the filler with ×3000 magnification and for the filler surface with ×50,000 magnification (inset image), (b) pore size distribution obtained by the nitrogen desorption measurement, (c) XRD pattern, and (d) FT-IR spectra of the fillers with and without silanization.
Jfb 13 00032 g001
Jfb 13 00032 g002 550
Figure 2. Characteristics of the PMMA-based resins with and without nanoporous silica filler: (a) SEM images, (b) FT-IR spectra, and (c) degree of conversions. The mean and standard deviation values are indicated in (c).
Figure 2. Characteristics of the PMMA-based resins with and without nanoporous silica filler: (a) SEM images, (b) FT-IR spectra, and (c) degree of conversions. The mean and standard deviation values are indicated in (c).
Jfb 13 00032 g002
Jfb 13 00032 g003 550
Figure 3. Mechanical properties of the PMMA-based resins with and without nanoporous silica filler: (a) flexural strength, (b) flexural modulus, and (c) Vickers hardness. The asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference between the values analyzed by Student’s t-test (n = 10, p < 0.01). The mean and standard deviation values are indicated in the figures.
Figure 3. Mechanical properties of the PMMA-based resins with and without nanoporous silica filler: (a) flexural strength, (b) flexural modulus, and (c) Vickers hardness. The asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference between the values analyzed by Student’s t-test (n = 10, p < 0.01). The mean and standard deviation values are indicated in the figures.
Jfb 13 00032 g003
Jfb 13 00032 g004 550
Figure 4. Physicochemical properties of the PMMA-based resins with and without nanoporous filler: (a) water sorption and (b) water solubility. The mean and standard deviation values are indicated in the figures.
Figure 4. Physicochemical properties of the PMMA-based resins with and without nanoporous filler: (a) water sorption and (b) water solubility. The mean and standard deviation values are indicated in the figures.
Jfb 13 00032 g004
Table
Table 1. Reagents used for sample preparation.
Table 1. Reagents used for sample preparation.
AcronymReagent NamePurposePurity (%)Supplier
SiO2Fumed silica (Aerosil® 300)Ceramic99.8Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
PVAPoly(vinyl alcohol)Binder78–82 *Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan
γ-MPTS3-Methacryl oxypropyl trimethoxysilaneSilane coupling agent99.9Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
PMMAPolymethyl methacrylatePolymerMw ≈ 15,000Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC., St. Louis, MS, USA
MMAMethyl methacrylateMonomer>98Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan
EGDMAEthylene glycol dimethacrylateCross-linker>97Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
BAPOPhenylbis (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxidePhoto-initiator>96Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
* Degree of saponification.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hata, K.; Ikeda, H.; Nagamatsu, Y.; Masaki, C.; Hosokawa, R.; Shimizu, H. Dental Poly(methyl methacrylate)-Based Resin Containing a Nanoporous Silica Filler. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13010032

AMA Style

Hata K, Ikeda H, Nagamatsu Y, Masaki C, Hosokawa R, Shimizu H. Dental Poly(methyl methacrylate)-Based Resin Containing a Nanoporous Silica Filler. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2022; 13(1):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13010032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hata, Kentaro, Hiroshi Ikeda, Yuki Nagamatsu, Chihiro Masaki, Ryuji Hosokawa, and Hiroshi Shimizu. 2022. "Dental Poly(methyl methacrylate)-Based Resin Containing a Nanoporous Silica Filler" Journal of Functional Biomaterials 13, no. 1: 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13010032

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop