Bacterial Cellulose/Cellulose Imidazolium Bio-Hybrid Membranes for In Vitro and Antimicrobial Applications
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Synthesis
2.2.1. Tosyl Cellulose Preparation
2.2.2. Preparation of Cellulose Containing Imidazolium Tosylate
2.2.3. Characterization Methods
2.3. Preinoculum Preparation
2.4. In Situ Preparation of BC/Cellulose Imidazolium (BC/Cell-IMD) Hydrogel
2.5. Cytocompatibility Assays
2.6. Antimicrobial Evaluation of BC and BC/Cell-IMD Hybrids
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Preparation of Cationic Cellulose Containing Imidazolium Tosylate
3.2. BC/Cell-IMD Bio-Hybrids’ Characterization
3.3. In Vitro Studies: Cytocompatibility
3.4. Antimicrobial Studies
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Picheth, G.F.; Pirich, C.L.; Sierakowski, M.R.; Woehl, M.A.; Sakakibara, C.N.; de Souza, C.F.; Martin, A.A.; da Silva, R.; de Freitas, R.A. Bacterial cellulose in biomedical applications: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 104, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pahlevanzadeh, F.; Setayeshmehr, M.; Bakhsheshi-Rad, H.R.; Emadi, R.; Kharaziha, M.; Poursamar, S.A.; Ismail, A.F.; Sharif, S.; Chen, X.; Berto, F. A Review on Antibacterial Biomaterials in Biomedical Applications: From Materials Perspective to Bioinks Design. Polymers 2022, 14, 2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Salama, A.; Mohamed, F.; Hesemann, P. Dielectric properties of chitosan and two ionic derivatives : Effect of counter anions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 297, 120018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parham, S.; Kharazi, A.Z.; Bakhsheshi-Rad, H.R.; Ghayour, H.; Ismail, A.F.; Nur, H.; Berto, F. Electrospun Nano-Fibers for Biomedical and Tissue Engineering Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Materials 2020, 13, 2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salama, A. Functionalized hybrid materials assisted organic dyes removal from aqueous solutions. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2016, 6, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pendas, S.; Asiminas, A.; Katranidis, A.; Tsioptsias, C.; Pitou, M.; Papadopoulos, G.; Choli-Papadopoulou, T. SpAD Biofunctionalized Cellulose Acetate Scaffolds Inhibit Staphylococcus aureus Adherence in a Coordinating Function with the von Willebrand A1 Domain (vWF A1). J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salama, A.; Hesemann, P. Recent Trends in Elaboration, Processing, and Derivatization of Cellulosic Materials Using Ionic Liquids. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 17893–17907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salama, A.; Abouzeid, R.E.; Owda, M.E.; Cruz-Maya, I.; Guarino, V. Cellulose–Silver Composites Materials: Preparation and Applications. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klemm, D.; Heublein, B.; Fink, H.P.; Bohn, A. Cellulose: Fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3358–3393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salama, A. Cellulose/calcium phosphate hybrids: New materials for biomedical and environmental applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 127, 606–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abouzeid, R.E.; Salama, A.; El-Fakharany, E.M.; Guarino, V. Mineralized Polyvinyl Alcohol/Sodium Alginate Hydrogels Incorporating Cellulose Nanofibrils for Bone and Wound Healing. Molecules 2022, 27, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Darpentigny, C.; Marcoux, P.R.; Menneteau, M.; Michel, B.; Ricoul, F.; Jean, B.; Bras, J.; Nonglaton, G. Antimicrobial Cellulose Nanofibril Porous Materials Obtained by Supercritical Impregnation of Thymol. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 3, 2965–2975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- El-Sayed, N.S.; Salama, A.; Guarino, V. Coupling of 3-Aminopropyl Sulfonic Acid to Cellulose Nanofibers for Efficient Removal of Cationic Dyes. Materials 2022, 15, 6964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parham, S.; Kharazi, A.Z.; Bakhsheshi-Rad, H.R.; Kharaziha, M.; Ismail, A.F.; Sharif, S.; Razzaghi, M.; RamaKrishna, S.; Berto, F. Antimicrobial Synthetic and Natural Polymeric Nanofibers as Wound Dressing: A Review. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2022, 24, 2101460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Portela, R.; Leal, C.R.; Almeida, P.L.; Sobral, R.G. Bacterial cellulose: A versatile biopolymer for wound dressing applications. Microb. Biotechnol. 2019, 12, 586–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Salama, A.; Abou-Zeid, R.E.; Cruz-Maya, I.; Guarino, V. Soy protein hydrolysate grafted cellulose nanofibrils with bioactive signals for bone repair and regeneration. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 229, 115472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, W.-C.; Lien, C.-C.; Yeh, H.-J.; Yu, C.-M.; Hsu, S. Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose–chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 94, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, S.M.; Rao, K.M.; Zo, S.M.; Shin, E.J.; Han, S.S. Bacterial Cellulose and Its Applications. Polymers (Basel) 2022, 14, 1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wahid, F.; Hu, X.-H.; Chu, L.-Q.; Jia, S.-R.; Xie, Y.-Y.; Zhong, C. Development of bacterial cellulose/chitosan based semi-interpenetrating hydrogels with improved mechanical and antibacterial properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 122, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopes, T.D.; Riegel-Vidotti, I.C.; Grein, A.; Tischer, C.A.; Faria-Tischer, P.C. de S. Bacterial cellulose and hyaluronic acid hybrid membranes: Production and characterization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 67, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, S.; Chi, K.; Yong, Q.; Catchmark, J.M. Synthesis of cationic bacterial cellulose using a templated metal phenolic network for antibacterial applications. Cellulose 2021, 28, 9283–9296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salama, A.; Hasanin, M.; Hesemann, P. Synthesis and antimicrobial properties of new chitosan derivatives containing guanidinium groups. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 241, 116363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Salama, A.; Mohamed, F.; Hesemann, P. Preparation and dielectric relaxation of a novel ionocellulose derivative. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2021, 2, 100087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-gendi, H.; Salama, A.; El-fakharany, E.M.; Saleh, A.K. Optimization of bacterial cellulose production from prickly pear peels and its ex situ impregnation with fruit byproducts for antimicrobial and strawberry packaging applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 302, 120383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hestrin, S.; Schramm, M. Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. 2. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem. J. 1954, 58, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gao, G.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, M.; Ma, T.; Li, G. In situ production of bacterial cellulose/xanthan gum nanocomposites with enhanced productivity and properties using Enterobacter sp. FY-07. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 248, 116788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsieh, J.-T.; Wang, M.-J.; Lai, J.-T.; Liu, H.-S. A novel static cultivation of bacterial cellulose production by intermittent feeding strategy. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2016, 63, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salama, A.; Saleh, A.K. Enhancement of Antimicrobial Response against Human Pathogens by a Novel Cationic Starch Derivative. Starch Stärke 2022, 74, 2100286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klemm, D.; Schumann, D.; Udhardt, U.; Marsch, S. Bacterial synthesized cellulose—Artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2001, 26, 1561–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castro, C.; Zuluaga, R.; Álvarez, C.; Putaux, J.-L.; Caro, G.; Rojas, O.J.; Mondragon, I.; Gañán, P. Bacterial cellulose produced by a new acid-resistant strain of Gluconacetobacter genus. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 89, 1033–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salama, A. Preparation of CMC-g-P(SPMA) super adsorbent hydrogels: Exploring their capacity for MB removal from waste water. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 106, 940–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Salama, A. Dicarboxylic cellulose decorated with silver nanoparticles as sustainable antibacterial nanocomposite material. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2017, 8, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salama, A.; Hesemann, P. Synthesis and characterization of N -guanidinium chitosan / silica ionic hybrids as templates for calcium phosphate mineralization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 147, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koschella, A.; Hartlieb, M.; Heinze, T. A “click-chemistry” approach to cellulose-based hydrogels. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, F. A 3D porous microsphere with multistage structure and component based on bacterial cellulose and collagen for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 236, 116043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Courtenay, J.C.; Johns, M.A.; Galembeck, F.; Deneke, C.; Lanzoni, E.M.; Costa, C.A.; Scott, J.L.; Sharma, R.I. Surface modified cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering. Cellulose 2017, 24, 253–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zuppolini, S.; Salama, A.; Cruz-Maya, I.; Guarino, V.; Borriello, A. Cellulose Amphiphilic Materials: Chemistry, Process and Applications. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, D.; Sun, Y.; Bao, Z.; Liu, W.; Xian, M.; Nian, R.; Xu, F. Improved Cell Viability and Biocompatibility of Bacterial Cellulose through in Situ Carboxymethylation. Macromol. Biosci. 2019, 19, 1800395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helenius, G.; Bäckdahl, H.; Bodin, A.; Nannmark, U.; Gatenholm, P.; Risberg, B. In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2006, 76A, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Culica, M.E.; Chibac-Scutaru, A.-L.; Mohan, T.; Coseri, S. Cellulose-based biogenic supports, remarkably friendly biomaterials for proteins and biomolecules. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 182, 113170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, U.-J.; Lee, Y.R.; Kang, T.H.; Choi, J.W.; Kimura, S.; Wada, M. Protein adsorption of dialdehyde cellulose-crosslinked chitosan with high amino group contents. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 163, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guarino, V.; Cirillo, V.; Taddei, P.; Alvarez-Perez, M.A.; Ambrosio, L. Tuning size scale and crystallinity of PCL electrospun fibres via solvent permittivity to address hMSC response. Macromol. Biosci. 2011, 11, 1694–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Orlacchio, R.; Zuppolini, S.; Cruz-Maya, I.; Pragliola, S.; Borriello, A.; Guarino, V.; Fittipaldi, R.; Lettieri, M.; Venditto, V. Polydopamine-Coated Poly-Lactic Acid Aerogels as Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications. Molecules 2022, 27, 2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ismail, L.A.; Zakaria, R.; Hassan, E.M.; Alfaifi, M.Y.; Shati, A.A.; Elbehairi, S.E.I.; El-Bindary, A.A.; Elshaarawy, R.F.M. Novel imidazolium-thiohydantoin hybrids and their Mn(III) complexes for antimicrobial and anti-liver cancer applications. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 28364–28375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mirtalebi, S.S.; Almasi, H.; Alizadeh Khaledabad, M. Physical, morphological, antimicrobial and release properties of novel MgO-bacterial cellulose nanohybrids prepared by in-situ and ex-situ methods. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 128, 848–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cornellas, A.; Perez, L.; Comelles, F.; Ribosa, I.; Manresa, A.; Garcia, M.T. Self-aggregation and antimicrobial activity of imidazolium and pyridinium based ionic liquids in aqueous solution. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 355, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pernak, J.; Sobaszkiewicz, K.; Mirska, I. Anti-microbial activities of ionic liquids. Green Chem. 2003, 5, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demberelnyamba, D.; Kim, K.-S.; Choi, S.; Park, S.-Y.; Lee, H.; Kim, C.-J.; Yoo, I.-D. Synthesis and antimicrobial properties of imidazolium and pyrrolidinonium salts. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 853–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, H.; Guo, J.; Zhou, J.; Shi, J.; Cui, H.; Shi, R.; Yao, J.; Fang, X.; Wang, B.; Yan, F. Antimicrobial poly(ionic liquid)-induced bacterial nanotube formation and drug-resistance spread. Biomater. Sci. 2022, 10, 6460–6471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, J.; Xu, Q.; Zheng, Z.; Zhou, S.; Mao, H.; Wang, B.; Yan, F. Intrinsically Antibacterial Poly(ionic liquid) Membranes: The Synergistic Effect of Anions. ACS Macro Lett. 2015, 4, 1094–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almasi, H.; Jafarzadeh, P.; Mehryar, L. Fabrication of novel nanohybrids by impregnation of CuO nanoparticles into bacterial cellulose and chitosan nanofibers: Characterization, antimicrobial and release properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 186, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Padrão, J.; Gonçalves, S.; Silva, J.P.; Sencadas, V.; Lanceros-Méndez, S.; Pinheiro, A.C.; Vicente, A.A.; Rodrigues, L.R.; Dourado, F. Bacterial cellulose-lactoferrin as an antimicrobial edible packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 58, 126–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xie, Y.-Y.; Hu, X.-H.; Zhang, Y.-W.; Wahid, F.; Chu, L.-Q.; Jia, S.-R.; Zhong, C. Development and antibacterial activities of bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide-CuO nanocomposite films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 229, 115456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, H.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, S.; Chai, S.; Wei, J.; Zhong, L.; He, Y.; Xue, J. Bacteriostatic activity and cytotoxicity of bacterial cellulose-chitosan film loaded with in-situ synthesized silver nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 281, 119017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sahariah, P.; Másson, M. Antimicrobial Chitosan and Chitosan Derivatives: A Review of the Structure-Activity Relationship. Biomacromolecules 2017, 18, 3846–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Organisms | Diameters of Inhibition Zone (mm) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
BC | BC/Cell-IMD | |||
0.2% | 0.4% | 0.6% | ||
E. coli | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
S. typhimurium | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
S. aureus | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 7 ± 2.09 a | 12 ± 2.25 a | 17 ± 2.47 a |
S. mutans | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 11 ± 1.78 c |
C. albicans | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 15 ± 0.83 b |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Salama, A.; Saleh, A.K.; Cruz-Maya, I.; Guarino, V. Bacterial Cellulose/Cellulose Imidazolium Bio-Hybrid Membranes for In Vitro and Antimicrobial Applications. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14020060
Salama A, Saleh AK, Cruz-Maya I, Guarino V. Bacterial Cellulose/Cellulose Imidazolium Bio-Hybrid Membranes for In Vitro and Antimicrobial Applications. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2023; 14(2):60. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14020060
Chicago/Turabian StyleSalama, Ahmed, Ahmed K. Saleh, Iriczalli Cruz-Maya, and Vincenzo Guarino. 2023. "Bacterial Cellulose/Cellulose Imidazolium Bio-Hybrid Membranes for In Vitro and Antimicrobial Applications" Journal of Functional Biomaterials 14, no. 2: 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14020060
APA StyleSalama, A., Saleh, A. K., Cruz-Maya, I., & Guarino, V. (2023). Bacterial Cellulose/Cellulose Imidazolium Bio-Hybrid Membranes for In Vitro and Antimicrobial Applications. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 14(2), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14020060