Next Article in Journal
Carbon Nanotube Migration in Melt-Compounded PEO/PE Blends and Its Impact on Electrical and Rheological Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Lead-Free Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3 Ferroelectric Nanomaterials for Pyro-Catalytic Dye Pollutant Removal under Cold-Hot Alternation
Previous Article in Journal
Reproducible Non-Volatile Multi-State Storage and Emulation of Synaptic Plasticity Based on a Copper-Nanoparticle-Embedded HfOx/ZnO Bilayer with Ultralow-Switching Current and Ideal Data Retention
Previous Article in Special Issue
Template-Free Hydrothermal Synthesis of Octahedron-, Diamond-, and Plate-like ZrO2 Mono-Dispersions
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Fabrication and Performance of UV Photodetector of ZnO Nanorods Decorated with Al Nanoparticles

Nanomaterials 2022, 12(21), 3768; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213768
by Shiguang Shang *, Yunpeng Dong, Wenqian Zhang and Wei Ren
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(21), 3768; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213768
Submission received: 23 September 2022 / Revised: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 18 October 2022 / Published: 26 October 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Dear reviewer,
Thank you very much for your positive comments and suggestions on our article! From your positive comments and suggestions, I can feel that you are an expert in this field, and your suggestions are deep and delicate, which will greatly improve us.

Please refer to the attachment for specific reply!

Thanks!
Best Regards!
Shiguang Shang
Email:[email protected]

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper by Shang et al. has considerably improved the ZnO nano road-based UV photodetector performance using Aluminum nanoparticles. The reviewer supports the publication, with following comments and suggestions.

·         The authors stated in the abstract about studying LSPR; however, there are no experimental measurements of LSPR in their work. They should provide an explanation and experimental measurements of it.

·         Authors claimed to obtain the Al nanoparticle by e-beam deposition; however, there is no experimental evidence of Al nanoparticles in the work. Also, authors should reference where people obtained the nanoparticle by e-beam deposition.

·         In Fig 3a ), providing an absorption spectrum would be better than the transmission and obtaining the actual bandgap from it.

·         In the PL paragraph from line 125, they should explain more clearly what they mean by gap and whether they are referring to defects or other gaps. And why is the main emission peak relatively broader, unlike narrow (or sharper) in literature?

·         According to the claim of the UV photodetector, the Authors should provide the figure of merit parameters such as responsivity, detectivity, and photoresponse speed (Surfaces and Interfaces 23 (2021) 100934).

·         ZnO is a crucial material for the development of energy-efficient UV-based optoelectronics. Authors should highlight this significant merit to provide impactful information to readers. Suggested references are Adv. Electron.Mater.2019, 5, 1900348; Nano Energy 91 (2022) 10667; Nano Energy 90 (2021) 106496; Cell Reports Physical Science 2 (2021) 100591; Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 194 (2019) 148–158; Nanoscale Adv., 2019,1, 2059-2085; Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 395;

Author Response

Dear reviewer,
Thank you very much for your positive comments and suggestions on our article! From your positive comments and suggestions, I can feel that you are an expert in this field, and your suggestions are deep and delicate, which will greatly improve us.

Please refer to the attachment for specific reply!

Thanks!
Best Regards!
Shiguang Shang
Email:[email protected]

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The revised manuscript of "Fabrication and Performance of UV Photodetector of ZnO Nanorods Decorated with Al Nanoparticles" shows a well-considered study and provides valuable information.

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors have improved the revised version and reviewer support the publication of the work

Back to TopTop