Next Article in Journal
One-Pot Synthesis of Lamellar Fe-Cu Bimetal-Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide and Its Enhanced Removal of Cr(VI) from Water
Next Article in Special Issue
Broadband Achromatic Metalens for Tunable Focused Vortex Beam Generation in the Near-Infrared Range
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Titanium Oxide Nanotubes Loaded with Hydroxyapatite
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Strategy for the Synthesis of High Stability of Luminescent Zero Dimensional–Two Dimensional CsPbBr3 Quantum Dot/1,4-bis(4-methylstyryl)benzene Nanoplate Heterostructures at an Atmospheric Condition
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Investigation of Vacancy-Ordered Double Perovskite Halides A2Sn1−xTixY6 (A = K, Rb, Cs; Y = Cl, Br, I): Promising Materials for Photovoltaic Applications

Nanomaterials 2023, 13(20), 2744; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13202744
by Wen Chen 1, Gang Liu 2,*, Chao Dong 3, Xiaoning Guan 3, Shuli Gao 1, Jinbo Hao 1, Changcheng Chen 1,* and Pengfei Lu 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(20), 2744; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13202744
Submission received: 2 September 2023 / Revised: 26 September 2023 / Accepted: 1 October 2023 / Published: 11 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nano-Optics and Nano-Optoelectronics: Challenges and Future Trends)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

I read the manuscript "Investigation of vacancy-ordered double perovskite halides A2Sn1-xTixY6 (A=K, Rb, Cs; Y=Cl, Br, I): promising materials for photovoltaic applications" and did not find significant problems. I hope the authors will make this manuscript more friendly to experimentalists before recommending publication. Please see the following points.

1. The authors should compare their calculated results with the reported experiments. The optical properties will be easy for such comparison.

2. How about the case of A = Li, Na or Y = F, (At)? 

3. Appendices A and B should be removed because there is no information here.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I am satisfied with the Authors' responses to my queries. I suggest the acceptance of the revised manuscript in its current form.

Back to TopTop