Next Article in Journal
Graphene-Based Tunable Dual-Frequency Terahertz Sensor
Previous Article in Journal
Organismal Function Enhancement through Biomaterial Intervention
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatially Structured Optical Pump for Laser Generation Tuning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Watt-Level Pulsed Er:Lu2O3 Laser Based on a TiB2 Saturable Absorber

1
China Key Laboratory of Laser & Infrared System (Shandong University), Ministry of Education, Qingdao 266237, China
2
School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(4), 379; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14040379
Submission received: 3 January 2024 / Revised: 2 February 2024 / Accepted: 6 February 2024 / Published: 18 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical Properties of Semiconductor Nanomaterials: 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
TiB2 nanoparticles with a bandgap of 0 eV were prepared, and the corresponding nonlinear optical response at 2.85 μm was investigated. Employing a TiB2 as a saturable absorber, a 2.85 μm pulsed Er:Lu2O3 crystal laser with an average output power of 1.2 W was achieved under a maximum pump power of 9.51 W. Laser pulses with durations of ~203 ns were delivered at a repetition rate of 154 kHz, which corresponds to a pulse energy of ~7.8 µJ and a peak power of 39.3 W. As far as we know, the result represents the highest average output power from all Q-switched Er:Lu2O3 crystal lasers.

1. Introduction

Solid-state pulsed laser systems operating in the mid-infrared range have demonstrated excellent performance in delivering high-energy laser pulses. Thus, they are attracting more attention in surgery, manufacture, atmospheric monitoring, and infrared countermeasures. Additionally, the laser can also serve as a pump source to drive optical parametric processes, extending the laser wavelength to a longer band [1,2,3].
The first laser at ~3 μm was realized with an Er3+-doped medium in 1967, which generated the stimulated transition from the energy level of 4I11/2 to 4I13/2 [4]. Nowadays, many Er3+-doped crystals (Er:YAG, Er:YLF, Er:Lu2O3, and Er:YAP) and ceramics (Er:Lu2O3 and Er:Y2O3) have been widely used to realize 3 μm lasers [5,6,7,8]. The Er:Lu2O3 crystal stands out among its counterparts due to its superior thermal and laser properties. Due to the similar mass between Lu3+ and Er3+, the latter distortion of Er:Lu2O3 crystals is smaller, and the thermal conductivity decay due to the doping is slighter [9]. Meanwhile, Er:Lu2O3 crystals with any doping concentration (0% to 100%) can be grown [9]. The heavy doping concentration will enhance the energy upconversion process of Er3+ ions; as a result, the laser can break the self-termination and even surpass the Stokes limit. Moreover, the low phonon energy of the crystal will reduce the possibility of non-radiative transmission of Er3+ ions, which leads to a higher fluorescence efficiency [10,11].
Pulsed lasers can be realized by employing modulators in the laser cavity. As novel optical modulators, low-dimensional materials feature properties of broad response bands, fast optical response, and ease of integration. Many outstanding pulsed lasers in the 3 μm region have also been reported; for example, a pulsed laser with a duration as short as 50 ns was realized with ZrC [12], and with a laser power as high as 1.13 W was realized with Ti3C2Tx nanoparticles [13]. However, compared with the output power reported in the continuous wave (CW) laser (>14 W) [14], a higher output power of the Q-switched Er:Lu2O3 crystal laser is worth being expected by optimized SAs.
Titanium diboride (TiB2) is a metal diboride with a hexagonal structure (space group P6/mmm). Recent studies show that the low-dimensional counterparts also maintain the hexagonal atomic structure and chemical composition [15,16,17]. Thus, the material exhibits high stability, high melting temperature, hydrolysis resistance, antioxidant capacity, and high LDT. Employed as an SA in a fiber laser, the TiB2 nanosheet has delivered ultrafast pulses with a pulse duration of 596 fs and a peak power of ~2 kW at emitting at 1559 nm [18]. The above property and result show that a mid-infrared pulsed laser with watt-level output power is worth being expected with TiB2. However, the optical response properties of the TiB2 nanoparticles in the mid-infrared region have been less reported.
In this paper, the band structure of TiB2 nanoparticles was calculated theoretically, which predicted the saturable absorption property of the TiB2 nanoparticles in the mid-IR region. The TiB2 nanoparticles were prepared using the liquid phase exfoliation method. We experimentally characterized its morphology and nonlinear optical response at 2.85 μm. The experimental results show the prepared TiB2 nanoparticles can function as SAs at 2.85 μm. The laser modulation ability of the TiB2 nanoparticles was investigated by integrating TiB2 SA into the Er:Lu2O3 crystal laser. As a result, laser pulses with a duration of ~203 ns and pulse energy of ~7.8 µJ were delivered at a repetition rate of 154 kHz, which corresponds to an average output power of 1.2 W and a peak power of 39.3 W.

2. The Electronic Property of TiB2 Nanoparticles

Figure 1a,b show a 2 × 2 × 1 TiB2 supercell used to explore the electronic properties of TiB2 nanomaterials. The geometry optimization and the band structure calculation of the supercell were performed with the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) function of Generalized gradients approximation (GGA). Energy, maximum force, and maximum displacement convergences were set as 2 × 10−5 Ha, 0.004 Ha·Å−1, and 0.005 Å, respectively. The calculated band structure and density of state (DOS) are shown in Figure 1c,d, respectively. The calculated bandgap of the materials is 0 eV, which meets well with the result reported in Ref. [15]. The graphene-like band structure of the materials allows it to absorb any incidence photon [19]. As a tiny sample possesses a certain number of electrons, when high-brightness light incident on the materials, electrons will be gradually excited to a high energy level until the sample is bleached. In macroscopic terms, the material will show a saturable absorption property. Therefore, the saturable absorption property of TiB2, at ~3 μm, is also worth expecting.

3. The Preparation, Morphology, and Optical Response of TiB2 Nanoparticles

The TiB2 nanoparticles were prepared using the liquid phase exfoliation method, which features excellent controllability and low preparation costs. To start, the commercially available TiB2 powder was mixed with pure isopropyl alcohol (IPA) at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. The mixture was then sonicated for four hours to exfoliate the TiB2 nanoparticles from the bulk counterpart before being centrifugation at 10,000 r/min for 15 min to retain the nanoparticles in the supernatant. Afterward, the supernatant was gathered for further characterization and experiments.
The morphology of the nanostructured TiB2 was thoroughly analyzed. Figure 2a depicts the SEM image, which clearly shows the granular structure of the sample consisting of numerous small exfoliations with a lateral size of a few micrometers. Figure 2b displays the TEM image; the stepwise variation in the grayscale reveals that TiB2 samples are assembled by the layer component with a width of a few micrometers. The grayscale variation in Figure 2b corresponds well with the SEM image that the TiB2 nanoparticles are prepared. Additionally, the image indicates that some ultra-thin TiB2 samples were also prepared.
The accurate thickness information of the exfoliations is characterized by atom force microscopy (AFM). The AFM image and the corresponding thickness distribution of the TiB2 nanoparticles are shown in Figure 3a,b, respectively. The step-varied thickness curve A in Figure 3b states that the prepared nanoparticles are assembled by many layers. Both curves in Figure 3b demonstrate that the peak thickness of the exfoliation is as thick as 80 nm. The above morphology characterizations state that the TiB2 nanoparticles have been successfully prepared.
In Figure 4a, the Raman spectra of bulk TiB2 (top) and TiB2 nanoparticles (bottom) are shown. The Raman peaks of the TiB2 nanoparticles have shifted compared to the bulk samples. Specifically, the peaks have shifted from 261 to 255 cm−1, 261 to 255 cm−1, and 261 to 255 cm−1, corresponding to the vibration modes of B1g, Eg, and A1g. If we ignore any measurement errors, the results match well with the findings of previous publications [20,21].
The optical response of the nanoparticles was characterized. The collected supernatant was spin-coated on a dual-end polished YAG substrate and dried at 80 °C for 10 min. The linearly optical transmittance is measured with an ultraviolet–visible near-infrared spectrophotometer (Cary 5000 UV-Vis-NIR, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). As depicted in Figure 4b, YAG-based TiB2 nanoparticles exhibit a smooth transmittance curve around an absolute transmittance of 80%, in the range from 1000 nm to 3300 nm. With a self-made Q-switched laser emitting at 2.85 μm, a clear saturable absorption property of the TiB2 nanoparticles was obtained and shown in the insert of Figure 4b, which corresponds to a saturable intensity of 0.46 mJ/cm2, a modulation depth of 3.7% and a saturable transmittance of 83.6%. The result shows that the TiB2 can be utilized as an SA and supports a pulsed laser operation.

4. Laser Experimental Setup

Figure 5 demonstrates the experimental setup of the TiB2 Q-switched Er:Lu2O3 crystal laser. In the setup, a fiber-coupled laser diode (LD) emitting at 976 nm was used as the pump source. The coupling fiber has a core diameter of 105 μm and a numerical aperture(NA) of t 0.22. The pump beam is focused on the gain medium via a 1:3 lens group (L1 and L2). The input coupler (IC) is a plane-concave mirror with a curvature radius of 10,000 mm, which is coated with both anti-reflectivity film (AR @ 950 to 1000 nm) and high-reflection film (R > 99% @ 2700 to 2900 nm). Three flat output couplers (OCs) with transmittance of 1%, 3%, and 5% at 2.85 μm were used to optimize the laser performance. The gain medium is an uncoated Er:Lu2O3 (7at.%) crystal with a dimension of 10 × 3 × 3 mm3, which is grown with the heat-exchanger (HEM) method [22,23,24]. The crystal is wrapped with indium foil and mounted in a copper block, which is cooled at 15 °C using a water-cooler. A prepared TiB2 SA is placed near the OC. The laser is separated from the residual pump via a dichroscope mirror (DM).
Output power is measured by a powerhead (S314C, Thorlabs Inc., Newton, NJ, USA) and a power meter (APM100D, Thorlabs Inc.). Laser pulse signals are detected using a fast HgCdTe IR photon detector (PVI-4TE-4, Vigo System, Ozarow Mazowiecki, Poland) with a response time of 1 ns. The signal was then observed on a digital phosphor oscilloscope (DPO 7104C, Tektronix Inc., Beaverton, USA) that has a bandwidth of 1 GHz and a sampling rate of 20 GS/s. Additionally, a Fourier transform optical spectrum analyzer (OSA 207C, Thorlabs Inc.) is used to detect the lasing spectra.

5. Results and Discussion

Initially, CW lasers were realized. As shown in Figure 6a, all the output powers increase linearly with the absorbed pump power. The three highest output powers of 2.23 W, 2.64 W, and 2.45 W were delivered with transmittances of OCs of 1%, 3%, and 5%. The error bars depicted in the figure represent uncertainties that are below 2%, which corresponds to slope efficiencies of 18.3%, 22.7%, and 20.5%, respectively. The laser spectrum at the output power of 2.64 W is shown in the inset of Figure 6a, which shows the central wavelength of the laser is 2.85 μm.
After integrating the TiB2 SA as a Q-switcher in the Er:Lu2O3 crystal laser, 3 μm laser pulses are delivered. Figure 6b depicts the properties of the average output power versus the absorbed pump power of the Q-switched lasers with different OCs. The highest average output powers in all cases are in the order of watts. With the 3% OC, the highest average output power of 1.2 W is realized, which corresponds to a slope efficiency of 15.0%. The maximum uncertainty of the output power of 5% for the Q-switched lasers is higher than that of the CW lasers. The corresponding lasing spectrum with a central wavelength of 2.85 μm is shown in the inset of Figure 6b. With the 1% OC and the 5% OC, average output powers of 0.96 W and 1.05 W are realized, respectively, corresponding to slope efficiencies of 10.8% and 13.3%. These results demonstrate that TiB2 nanoparticles are an excellent Q-switcher in delivering high-power laser in the mid-infrared band.
The evolutions of repetition rates and pulse durations with respect to the absorbed pump power are shown in Figure 7. The repetition rates increase as the absorbed pump power increases, which corresponds to an uncertainty of 8%. The maximum pulse repetition rate of 166 kHz is achieved in the T = 1% Q-switched laser system. Figure 7b shows that the pulse duration is reduced when the absorbed pump power increases. The shortest pulse duration of 203 ns is realized with the OC of T = 3%, whose uncertainty is 5%. In Figure 8, the output pulse train and the single pulse shape at the highest repetition rate are presented, which indicates the output laser pulse is relatively stable. The maximum amplitude difference (peak to peak) is estimated to be less than 10%. It is noteworthy that the stable pulse train can also be regenerated from the TiB2 SA-based Er:Lu2O3 laser when the TiB2 SA has been exposed to free space for a month. This demonstrates the excellent hydrolysis resistance and outstanding antioxidant capacity of the TiB2 SA.
Figure 9a,b present the variations in single pulse energy and peak power with the absorbed pump power. At the maximum absorbed pump power of 9.51 W, laser pulses with energies of 5.7 µJ, 7.8 µJ, and 7.6 µJ were generated from T = 1%, 3%, and 5% systems, respectively (see Figure 9a). The increased pulse energy and shortened pulse duration make the pulse peak power increase with the absorbed pump power (see Figure 9b). The maximum pulse peak power approaching 38 W was realized at the OC of T = 3%.
Table 1 summarizes some typical performance of the 3 μm passively Q-switched Er:Lu2O3 crystal lasers. It shows that the TiB2-based Q-switched Er:Lu2O3 laser has many advantages, such as high output power, relatively high pulse energy, shorter pulse duration, and high pulse peak power, which are attributed to the high laser damage threshold of TiB2 SA.
It is possible to achieve shorter laser pulses in TiB2-based Q-switched Er:Lu2O3 crystal lasers. This is because the shortest pulse duration from a passively Q-switched bulk laser is proportional to the laser cavity length while inversely proportional to the SA’s modulation depth [27]. To achieve this, a more compact laser cavity and optimized TiB2 nanoparticles with a larger modulation depth can be used. Further power scaling can also be expected by improving the mode matching between the pumping laser and the oscillated laser inside the laser cavity.

6. Conclusions

In this paper, TiB2 nanoparticles were prepared via the liquid phase exfoliation method, and their morphology was analyzed using SEM, TEM, and AFM. The TiB2 nanoparticles demonstrated a saturable absorption property at 2.85 μm, which was both theoretically predicted and experimentally verified. Employed as an SA, a 2.85 μm pulsed Er:Lu2O3 laser with an average output power of 1.2 W was achieved under a maximum pump power of 9.51 W. The related shortest pulse duration and pulse energy of 203 ns and 7.8 µJ were delivered at a 154 kHz repetition rate. As far as we know, the reported result represents the highest output power of the Q-switched Er:Lu2O3 crystal laser. The findings indicate that TiB2, as an SA, possesses several advantages, such as exceptional optical performance, good mechanical and thermal stability, and easy preparation. These outcomes also offer valuable insights into the advancement of pulsed mid-infrared solid-state lasers. By using better materials and improving the quality of the SAs, it is possible to produce a pulsed Er:Lu2O3 crystal laser with an output power exceeding 2 W.

Author Contributions

Methodology, investigation, data curation, Y.L. and L.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L.; writing—review and editing, L.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (62305192) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2019MF061 and ZR2020MF116).

Data Availability Statement

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Skorczakowski, M.; Swiderski, J.; Pichola, W.; Nyga, P.; Zajac, A.; Maciejewska, M.; Galecki, L.; Kasprzak, J.; Gross, S.; Heinrich, A. Mid-infrared Q-switched Er:YAG laser for medical applications. Laser Phys. Lett. 2010, 7, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vodopyanov, K. Mid-infrared optical parametric generator with extra-wide (3–19-µm) tunability: Applications for spectroscopy of two-dimensional electrons in quantum wells. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1999, 16, 1579–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bekman, H.H.P.T.; Heuvel, J.C.; van Putten, F.J.M.; Schleijpen, R. Development of a mid-infrared laser for the study of infrared countermeasures techniques. Technol. Opt. Countermeas. SPIE 2004, 5615, 27–38. [Google Scholar]
  4. Robinson, M.; Devor, D.P. Thermal switching of laser emission of Er3+ at 2.69 μm and Tm3+ at 1.86 μm in mixed crystals of CaF2:ErF3:TmF3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1967, 10, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Labbe, C.; Doualan, J.L.; Camy, P.; Moncorgé, R.; Thuau, M. The 2.8 μm laser properties of Er3+ doped CaF2 crystals. Opt. Commun. 2002, 209, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stoneman, R.C.; Lynn, J.G.; Esterowitz, L. Direct upper-state pumping of the 2.8 μm, Er3+:YLF laser. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1992, 28, 1041–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wyss, C.; Lüthy, W.; Weber, H.P.; Rogin, P.; Hulliger, J. Emission properties of an optimised 2.8 μm Er3+:YLF laser. Opt. Commun. 1997, 139, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pollnau, M.; Lüthy, W.; Weber, H.P.; Jensen, T.; Huber, G.; Cassanho, A.; Jenssen, H.P.; McFarlane, R.A. Investigation of diode-pumped 2.8-μm laser performance in Er:BaY2F8. Opt. Lett. 1996, 21, 48–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kränkel, C. Rare-earth-doped sesquioxides for diode-pumped high-power lasers in the 1-, 2-, and 3-μm spectral range. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2014, 21, 250–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mackenzie, J.I. Planar waveguides, a power scaling architecture for low-gain quasi-four-level lasers. In Proceedings of the Advanced Solid-State Lasers Congress, Paris, France, 27 October–1 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
  11. Koopmann, P.; Lamrini, S.; Scholle, K.; Schäfer, M.; Fuhrberg, P.; Huber, G. Multi-watt laser operation and laser parameters of Ho-doped Lu2O3 at 2.12 μm. Opt. Mater. Express 2011, 1, 1447–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liang, Y.; Li, T.; Qiao, W.; Feng, T.; Zhao, S.; Zhao, Y.; Song, Y.; Kränkel, C. Mid-infrared Q-switch performance of ZrC. Photonics Res. 2020, 8, 1857–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Su, C.; Liu, Y.; Feng, T.; Qiao, W.; Zhao, Y.; Liang, Y.; Li, T. Optical modulation of the MXene Ti3C2Tx saturable absorber for Er:Lu2O3 laser. Opt. Mater. 2021, 115, 110949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liang, Y.; Li, T.; Zhang, B.; He, J.; Kalusniak, S.; Zhao, X.; Kränkel, C. 14.1 W continuous-wave dual-end diode-pumped Er:Lu2O3 laser at 2.85 µm. Chin. Opt. Lett. 2024, 22, 011403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kumar, R.; Mishra, M.C.; Sharma, B.K.; Sharma, V.; Lowther, J.E.; Vyas, V.; Sharma, G. Electronic structure and elastic properties of TiB2 and ZrB2. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2012, 61, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, L.Z.; Wang, Z.F.; Du, S.X.; Gao, H.J.; Liu, F. Prediction of a Dirac state in monolayer TiB2. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 90, 161402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yousaf, A.; Gilliam, M.S.; Chang, S.L.Y.; Augustin, M.; Guo, Y.; Tahir, F.; Wang, M.; Schwindt, A.; Chu, X.S.; Li, D.O.; et al. Exfoliation of Two-Dimensional Nanosheets of Metal Diborides. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2001.09237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, F.; Lan, D.; Qu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, T. TiB2 nanoparticles with a broadband nonlinear response for ultrafast pulse generation. J. Mater. Chem. C 2022, 10, 10943–10949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dawlaty, M.J.; Shivaraman, S.; Strait, J.; George, P.; Chandrashekhar, M.; Rana, F.; Spencer, G.M.; Veksler, D.; Chen, Y. Measurement of the optical absorption spectra of epitaxial graphene from terahertz to visible. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 131905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bača, Ľ.; Stelzer, N. Adapting of sol–gel process for preparation of TiB2 powder from low-cost precursors. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 28, 907–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, K.; Feng, J.; Guo, J.; Chen, L.; Feng, Y.; Tang, Y.; Lu, H.; Yu, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, H.; et al. (1-10) Facet-Dominated TiB2 Nanosheets with High Exposure of Dual-Atom-Sites for Enhanced Polysulfide Conversion in Li-S Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 2314657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, T.; Beil, K.; Kränkel, C.; Brandt, C.; Huber, G. Laser performance of highly doped Er:Lu2O3 at 2.8 µm. In Advanced Solid-State Photonics; Optica Publishing Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  23. Uvarova, A.; Guguschev, C.; Kränkel, C. Growth and characterization of high-melting sesquioxides for 3 µm lasers. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe and European Quantum Electronics Conference, Munich, Germany, 23–27 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
  24. Reichert, F.; Fechner, M.; Koopmann, P.; Brandt, C.; Petermann, K.; Huber, G. Spectroscopy and Laser Action of the Nd-Doped Mixed Sesquioxide Lu2−xScxO3. In Advances in Optical Materials; Optica Publishing Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fan, M.; Li, T.; Zhao, S.; Li, G.; Ma, H.; Gao, X.; Kränkel, C.; Huber, G. Watt-level passively Q-switched Er:Lu2O3 at 2.84 μm using MoS2. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 540–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fan, M.; Li, T.; Zhao, S.; Li, G.; Gao, X.; Yang, K.; Li, D.; Kränkel, C. Multilayer black phosphorus as saturable absorber for an Er:Lu2O3 laser at ∼3  μm. Photonics Res. 2016, 4, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Spühler, G.J.; Paschotta, R.; Fluck, R.; Braun, B.; Moser, M.; Zhang, G.; Gini, E.; Keller, U. Experimentally confirmed design guidelines for passively Q-switched microchip lasers using semiconductor saturable absorbers. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1999, 16, 376–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the TiB2 supercell views down (a) c-axis and (b) a-axis; the corresponding (c) band structure, and (d) density of state.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the TiB2 supercell views down (a) c-axis and (b) a-axis; the corresponding (c) band structure, and (d) density of state.
Nanomaterials 14 00379 g001
Figure 2. (a) SEM and (b) TEM image of the prepared TiB2 nanoparticles.
Figure 2. (a) SEM and (b) TEM image of the prepared TiB2 nanoparticles.
Nanomaterials 14 00379 g002
Figure 3. (a) AFM image of the TiB2 nanoparticles, (b) the height variation of TiB2 nanoparticles along the section A and B in figure (a).
Figure 3. (a) AFM image of the TiB2 nanoparticles, (b) the height variation of TiB2 nanoparticles along the section A and B in figure (a).
Nanomaterials 14 00379 g003
Figure 4. (a) Raman spectra of TiB2 bulk (top) and nanoparticles samples (bottom); (b) optical transmittance of YAG-based TiB2 nanoparticles.
Figure 4. (a) Raman spectra of TiB2 bulk (top) and nanoparticles samples (bottom); (b) optical transmittance of YAG-based TiB2 nanoparticles.
Nanomaterials 14 00379 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the TiB2 Q-switched Er:Lu2O3 laser.
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the TiB2 Q-switched Er:Lu2O3 laser.
Nanomaterials 14 00379 g005
Figure 6. (a) Output power of CW Er:Lu2O3 laser versus absorbed pump power, inset: corresponding lasing spectrum at maximum output power; (b) average output power of the Q-switched Er:Lu2O3 laser versus absorbed pump power, inset: corresponding lasing spectrum at maximum output power.
Figure 6. (a) Output power of CW Er:Lu2O3 laser versus absorbed pump power, inset: corresponding lasing spectrum at maximum output power; (b) average output power of the Q-switched Er:Lu2O3 laser versus absorbed pump power, inset: corresponding lasing spectrum at maximum output power.
Nanomaterials 14 00379 g006
Figure 7. (a) pulse repetition rates and (b) pulse durations of the Q-switched laser versus absorbed pump power.
Figure 7. (a) pulse repetition rates and (b) pulse durations of the Q-switched laser versus absorbed pump power.
Nanomaterials 14 00379 g007
Figure 8. (a) Q-switched pulse train and (b) single pulse shape.
Figure 8. (a) Q-switched pulse train and (b) single pulse shape.
Nanomaterials 14 00379 g008
Figure 9. (a) pulse energy properties and (b) peak power properties of the Q-switched Er:Lu2O3 laser.
Figure 9. (a) pulse energy properties and (b) peak power properties of the Q-switched Er:Lu2O3 laser.
Nanomaterials 14 00379 g009
Table 1. Summary of performances of the reported passively Q-switched Er:Lu2O3 crystal lasers.
Table 1. Summary of performances of the reported passively Q-switched Er:Lu2O3 crystal lasers.
SAAverage
Power
(W)
Pulse
Energy
(μJ)
Pulse
Duration
(ns)
Peak
Power
(W)
Ref.
MoS21.0308.533525[25]
BP0.7557.135920[26]
ZrC0.2622250440[12]
MXenes Ti3C2Tx1.1307.618740[13]
TiB21.207.820339.3This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, Y.; Zhang, L. A Watt-Level Pulsed Er:Lu2O3 Laser Based on a TiB2 Saturable Absorber. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 379. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14040379

AMA Style

Liang Y, Zhang L. A Watt-Level Pulsed Er:Lu2O3 Laser Based on a TiB2 Saturable Absorber. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(4):379. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14040379

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Yangyang, and Lu Zhang. 2024. "A Watt-Level Pulsed Er:Lu2O3 Laser Based on a TiB2 Saturable Absorber" Nanomaterials 14, no. 4: 379. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14040379

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop