Next Article in Journal
High-Performance Passive Plasma Separation on OSTE Pillar Forest
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Physicochemical Characterization of Polymer Film-Based Anthocyanin and Starch
Previous Article in Journal
Determining Particle Size and Position in a Coplanar Electrode Setup Using Measured Opacity for Microfluidic Cytometry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ratiometric G-Quadruplex Assay for Robust Lead Detection in Food Samples
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bio-Specific Au/Fe3+ Porous Spongy Nanoclusters for Sensitive SERS Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7

1
Institute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
2
Laboratory of Chemistry of Natural Molecules, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biosensors 2021, 11(10), 354; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11100354
Submission received: 24 August 2021 / Revised: 17 September 2021 / Accepted: 18 September 2021 / Published: 24 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterial-Based Biosensors for Food Analysis)

Abstract

:
For sensitive and fast detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7, organic and inorganic hybrid Au/Fe3+ nanoclusters (NCs) were synthesized for the first time using gold nanoparticles (GNPs), bovine serum albumin, ferric chloride, phosphate-buffered saline, and antibodies. The Au/Fe3+ porous spongy NCs with large surface area showed excellent bio-specific capability for E. coli O157:H7. GNPs in Au/Fe3+ NCs functioned as signal enhancers, significantly increasing the Raman signal via the metathesis reaction product of Prussian blue and obviously improving the detection sensitivity. We combined the novel Au/Fe3+ NCs with antibody-modified magnetic nanoparticles to create a biosensor capable of sensitive detection of E. coli O157:H7, which showed a good linear response (101 to 106 cfu/mL), high detection sensitivity (2 cfu/mL), and good recovery rate (93.60–97.50%) in spiked food samples. These results make the biosensor well-suited for food safety monitoring. This strategy achieves the goal of sensitive and quantitative detection of E. coli O157:H7.

1. Introduction

Food safety problems caused by foodborne pathogens have attracted increasing concern globally. Escherichia coli O157:H7 is one of the main foodborne pathogens; it passes through the entire food supply chain from farm to table. Escherichia coli O157:H7 can cause diarrhea, abdominal pain, and hemolytic-uremic syndrome, which is dangerous to children [1]. According to the World Health Organization, the global incidence of E. coli is 2.8 million cases per year. Enterotoxigenic E. coli infections caused 51,186 deaths worldwide according to the 2016 Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors study [2]. Traditional methods for E. coli O157:H7 detection, which include culture plate [3], polymerase chain reaction [4], and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [5], have limitations including low sensitivity, the requirement for trained personnel, and/or a long testing time. A sensitive, fast, and specific detection method is urgently needed to avoid E. coli O157:H7 infectious outbreaks and improve treatment.
Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) is a spectroscopic technique based on molecular vibrations, in which Raman signals are greatly enhanced via interaction with rough metal surfaces. The enhancement is due to local surface plasmon resonance, or “hot spots” located at junctions [6,7,8]. SERS-based biosensors have been proven to be powerful tool for pathogen detection due to its precision, non-requirement for tedious sample pretreatment, high sensitivity, and quantitative detection capability [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Gold nanoparticles (GNPs), which are the most commonly used SERS substrate, have the advantages of facile synthesis, stable colloidal properties, and excellent signal enhancement effect [15,16]. To improve sensitivity, GNPs are encapsulated with Raman reporters as SERS tags, which provide strong Raman signals due to plasmonic hot spots at junctions between closely packed GNPs [17]. To improve specificity, GNPs are often linked with biorecognition groups, such as glutaraldehyde, aptamers, or antibodies [11,18,19]. Among these, monoclonal antibodies are mostly commonly used due to their high specificity and uniformity. However, direct Raman signals produced by SERS tags exhibit limited signal enhancement and are easily influenced by the surroundings. Signal amplification is needed to enhance signal strength and detection sensitivity.
The catalytic activity of certain inorganic ions and organic hybrid nanomaterials has the potential for signal enhancement in pathogen detection applications [20]. The inorganic ions of interest include Cu2+, Fe3+, Ca2+, and Au3+, which can be fabricated into nanoparticles (NPs) having very large specific surface areas [21,22,23,24]. The organic materials include bovine serum albumin (BSA), enzymes, and antibodies, which are more suited to biological applications such as enhancing enzymatic activity and biorecognition of antibodies [25,26,27]. For example, immune Ca2+ nanoclusters (NCs) have been constructed for pathogen detection by an electrochemical biosensor [28], highly fluorescent Au NCs have been synthesized for sensitive detection of E. coli [29], and Fe3+ NCs have been used for rapid colorimetric detection of Salmonella via smart-phone imaging [20]. The ferric ion (Fe3+) present in Prussian blue (PB) can function as a highly sensitive and background-free resonant Raman reporter; it displays a strong and sharp single vibrational peak at 2150 cm−1 [30]. Furthermore, PB has been assembled onto GNPs to provide SERS tags with a high signal-to-background ratio [30]. We propose that NCs consisting of Fe3+ and antibodies might be feasible for E. coli O157:H7 SERS detection via the characteristic Raman signal of PB following reaction with Fe3+ NCs and biorecognition of antibodies. By adding GNPs to Fe3+ NCs, significant Raman signal enhancement by the GNPs could improve detection of E. coli O157:H7.
Herein, we describe a sensitive and rapid SERS biosensor for E. coli O157:H7 based on novel Au/Fe3+ NCs. The Au/Fe3+ NCs, which were synthesized using inorganic components (PBS, GNPs, Fe3+) and organic components (BSA, antibodies complementary to E. coli O157:H7), had a porous spongy structure with high specific surface area (Figure 1a). Reaction with Fe3+ of the PB realized Raman signals, the GNPs provided stable and strong signal enhancement, and antibodies offered biorecognition of E. coli O157:H7. The Au/Fe3+ NCs specifically labeled target pathogens to form sandwich complexes with antibody-modified magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), thereby realizing sensitive SERS detection of the pathogens via indirect Raman signal from E. coli O157:H7, but from Prussian blue (Figure 1b). This biosensor, benefiting from the novel Au/Fe3+ NCs, achieved the goal of sensitive and quantitative detection of E. coli O157:H7. This biosensor may become an effective tool for the detection of foodborne pathogens.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Reagents

Chloroauric acid trihydrate (HAuCl4), trisodium citrate, BSA, and ferric chloride (FeCl3) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4, 10 mM) was obtained from Gibco (Beijing, China). Streptavidin-modified MNPs of 150-nm diameter were purchased from Ocean Nanotech (Dunedin, FL, USA). Luria–Bertani medium (LB), agar and alkaline peptone water medium were obtained from Aoboxing Biotech (Beijing, China). Escherichia coli O157:H7 (ATCC 43888), E. coli (ATCC 25922), Salmonella typhimurium (ATCC 14028), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Vibrio parahemolyticus (ATCC 17802) were purchased from Solarbio Life Sciences (Beijing, China). Potassium ferrocyanide and hydrochloric acid were obtained from Sinopharm (Shanghai, China). Rabbit antibody against E. coli O157:H7 was purchased from Meridian Life Science (Memphis, TN, USA). A Long-arm Biotin Labeling Kit from Elabscience Biotechnology (Wuhan, China) was used for the modification of antibodies. Ultrapure water was prepared using a Milli-Q system (Bedford, MA, USA).

2.2. Preparation of Novel Au/Fe3+ Nanoclusters

The novel Au/Fe3+ NCs were fabricated via a one-pot synthesis method (Figure 1). Gold NPs were prepared via a chemical reduction method, as previously reported [15]. Briefly, 1 mL of HAuCl4 (1%, w/v) was dissolved in 100 mL of ultrapure water and boiled. Then, 4 mL of sodium citrate (1%, w/v) was rapidly added under magnetic stirring and the solution was boiled for 15 min until it turned dark red. The prepared GNPs were purified by centrifugation (8000× g, 10 min). The Au/Fe3+ NCs were prepared as follows. First, 30 µL of 1 mg/mL BSA and 2 µL of 1 mg/mL antibodies were dissolved in 10 mM PBS buffer (pH 7.4). The synthesized GNPs (200 µL; OD 0.5) were mixed with the solution and shaken vigorously, followed by addition of 100 µL of 100 mM FeCl3. The mixture was then incubated at room temperature for 24 h at 15 rpm, centrifuged at 5000× g for 5 min to remove the supernatant, and finally resuspended in ultrapure water for later use.

2.3. Characterization of Au/Fe3+ Nanoclusters

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM; model HT7700; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) was used to characterize nanostructure morphology. High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) and energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) were conducted for studying elemental distributions using a JEM-2100F microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at 200 kV accelerating voltage. A UV-1780 spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to record Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectra. A confocal Raman microscope (JY H-800; Horiba, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a 633-nm He–Ne excitation laser was used for SERS spectrum collection. Raman peaks range from 1800 to 2500 cm−1 was collected under 12-mW laser power with 10 s integration time. The Raman signal intensity was measured at five random spots.

2.4. Separation and Detection of Bacteria

Fe3O4-antibody capture probes were prepared by conjugating monoclonal antibodies onto MNPs according to previously method [19]. Then, 30 µL of antibody-modified MNPs was incubated with different concentrations of Escherichia coli O157:H7 (101 to 108) for 15 min at 15 rpm to form MNP–bacteria complexes, and washed twice by magnetically separation. Then, 30 µL of the prepared Au/Fe3+ NCs was added, followed by 15-min incubation at 15 rpm. The capture probe–pathogen–Au/Fe3+ NCs sandwich complexes were collected and washed twice with PBS under a magnetic field. Then, 10 µL of 6% HCl was added to the collected sandwich complexes and vortexed to mix. The MNPs were separated and removed. Potassium ferrocyanide (6 µL of 100 mM) was added and the solution was mixed to create PB for later SERS experiments.

2.5. Optimization of the Au/Fe3+ Nanoclusters-Based Biosensor

Different volumes of Fe3+ (25, 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 µL) and GNPs (50, 100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 µL) were tested to optimize the conditions for fabrication of Au/Fe3+ NCs. During the detection procedure, HCl was used to release Fe3+ from Au/Fe3+ NCs for subsequent metathesis reaction. The volume of HCl (0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, and 15 µL) was also optimized to obtain the strong Raman signal intensity of the fabricated Au/Fe3+ NCs and maximize the detection sensitivity. Then, we determined the optimal concentration of Au/Fe3+ NCs by adding various concentrations (15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 nΜ) of Au/Fe3+ NCs to 105 cfu/mL of E. Coli O157:H7.

2.6. Performance Evaluation of the Biosensor

To measure the sensitivity of the biosensor, different concentrations of E. coli O157:H7 101–108 cfu/mL) were detected and the limit of detection (LOD) was calculated. To evaluate the specificity of the biosensor, different kinds of bacteria including E. coli, S. typhimurium, S. aureus, and V. parahemolyticus were used. In addition, 18 random samples from the same E. coli O157:H7 sample at 102 cfu/mL were selected to measure the reproducibility of the biosensor.

2.7. Analyses of Food Samples

Samples of tap water, lettuce, and chicken were used for realistic detection of E. coli O157:H7 and the preparation of samples was the same as reported previously, with minor modifications [15]. The recovery and accuracy of this method was calculated by compared to the traditional plate counting method.

2.8. Data Analyses

LabSpec software and TQ Analyst software (v. 8.0; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were used to record and analyze the SERS spectra. All analyses of SERS detection were performed at least five times, and each plate-counting determination was done in triplicate. Origin 8.0 software (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA) was used to draw the figures.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fabrication and Characterization of Au/Fe3+ Porous Spongy Nanoclusters

The Au/Fe3+ NCs, which are critical to the performance of the biosensor, were characterized by HRTEM, EDS, TEM, UV–vis absorption spectroscopy and SERS. Figure 2a shows that the ~300-nm diameter prepared Au/Fe3+ NCs had a porous spongy structure and GNPs were uniformly distributed on them. The porous spongy structure provides advantages for the better recognition of antibodies due to the big specific area and makes it easier for the release of iron ions for later PB reaction, both contributing to the sensitive and specific detection of E. coli O157:H7. The EDS characterization demonstrated successful fabrication of Au/Fe3+ NCs by PBS (element P), BSA and antibodies (element N), FeCl3 (element Fe), and GNPs (element Au), which suggested the necessity of four kinds of reagents for synthesis of the porous spongy structure of the Au/Fe3+ NCs.
To verify this assumption, we synthesized Au/Fe3+ NCs with one reagent missing (Figure 2b). In the absence of GNPs, the synthesized NCs were flake shaped. In the absence of BSA, the GNPs agglomerated during the synthesis process due to a lack of protection from ions in the PBS solution. In the absence of PBS, which could function as a skeleton during the Au/Fe3+ NC synthesis [23], the BSA could not complex well, and a loose flocculant structure resulted. In the absence of FeCl3, which was considered as one type of bonding point of Au/Fe3+ NCs, the BSA complex reaction was also affected and less BSA adsorbed on the surface of the GNPs. These results confirmed the necessity of all of these reagents for successful Au/Fe3+ NCs synthesis.
The Au/Fe3+ NCs also exhibited strong Raman signal enhancement, presumably due to the presence of the GNPs that enhanced the PB Raman signal, which formed via the release of Fe3+ by HCl treatment and Fe2+ in potassium ferrocyanide. Figure 2d shows that the designed Au/Fe3+ NCs displayed the characteristic strong Raman peak of PB at 2150 cm−1. The signal intensity was related to the Fe3+ and GNPs contents of the NCs. When no HCl was present to release Fe3+ from the Au/Fe3+ NCs, no PB was generated and thus no Raman signal appeared. If there were no GNPs in the NCs, PB could still be produced due to the Fe3+ present in the flake-shaped product, but the Raman signal intensity was much weaker. This result confirmed our hypothesis that the GNPs functioned as signal enhancers. The strong Raman signal intensity greatly improved the detection sensitivity of the biosensor.

3.2. Formation Mechanism of Au/Fe3+ Nanoclusters

The GNPs were well-dispersed in the absence of PBS or FeCl3, but were aggregated in the BSA-free sample. Our proposed synthetic mechanism for the one-pot synthesis process (Figure 3a) was supported by scanning electron microscope observations (Figure 3b). Citrate anions, functioning as an electrostatic stabilizing agent, covered the surface of the GNPs after synthesis [31]. The negative surface charge of the citrate layer provided mutual repulsion between neighboring GNPs and offered electrostatic stabilization. The GNPs aggregated in a salt solution due to destruction of the citrate layer by the positive ions. When GNPs were added to a BSA solution in PBS, positively charged groups of BSA adsorbed on the surface of GNPs, which protected the GNPs from the positive ions of PBS, thereby preventing aggregation. Previous quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D) and ζ-potential measurements suggested that the dominant association of BSA with citrate-coated NPs was electrostatic [32]. The electrostatic interactions between citrate and lysine on the protein surface were of the carboxylate–ammonium type. Studies of the binding of BSA to Au surfaces revealed nonspecific binding to self-assembled monolayers with NH3+ [33,34]. Besides the support provided by strong electrostatic binding, the steric interactions between protein and citrate on the surface layer of GNPs could provide greater stability than pure electrostatic interactions, due to the reduction of entropy and loss of solvation enthalpy resulting from the interactions of protein side chains or domains.
The Au/Fe3+ NCs formed as Fe3+ and more PBS and BSA were added. Interaction between the protein and inorganic ions then led to the growth of micrometer-sized particles having nanoscale features [23]. Previous research suggested that coordination between the protein and Fe3+ might be the main driver of nanoflower formation. The N atoms of the amide groups in the protein backbone and some amino acid residues, such as histidine, could form complexes with Fe3+ [35,36]. Figure 3b presents the TEM results. The GNPs of ~15-nm diameter were well dispersed. Added BSA adsorbed on the surface of GNPs, and added Fe3+ formed Au/Fe3+ NCs having a porous spongy structure. These findings are in good agreement with previous research concerning the mechanism of formation of the organic–inorganic material.

3.3. Optimization of Au/Fe3+ NCs-Based SERS Biosensor

The Fe3+ content of Au/Fe3+ NCs enabled the production of PB, with its single intense Raman signal. Meanwhile, the GNPs in Au/Fe3+ NCs were important for SERS signal enhancement. Thus, the volumes of Fe3+ and GNPs were tested to optimize the conditions for fabrication of the Au/Fe3+ NCs. With increasing amounts of Fe3+ or GNPs, the Raman signal intensity of the SERS tags increased, reached an optimum, and then decreased (Figure 4a,b). To facilitate sensitive detection of E. coli O157:H7, the optimal volumes of Fe3+ and GNPs for the one-pot syntheses of the Au/Fe3+ NCs were 100 and 200 μL, respectively.
During the detection procedure, HCl was used to release Fe3+ from the Au/Fe3+ NCs for subsequent metathesis reaction to produce PB. The structure of NCs was broken after adding HCl, and GNPs were released. The BSA on surface of GNPs might be damaged under acidic condition. Therefore, the new produced PB could attached nearly on GNPs and generate localized surface plasmon resonance during SERS measurement. On the other hand, the stability of released GNPs was disappeared, and GNPs gathered which could contribute to plasmonic hot spots during SERS measurement. To optimize the volume of HCl, various volumes were evaluated, and the resulting Raman signal intensity was monitored to maximize the detection sensitivity. Figure 4c shows that the Raman signal intensity increased as the volume increased from 0 to 15 μL. The final choice of 10 μL provided the highest signal intensity and avoided reduction of the MNPs.
To determine the optimal concentration of Au/Fe3+ NCs in the biosensor system, various concentrations of Au/Fe3+ NCs were added to a 105 cfu/mL suspension of E. coli O157:H7. The strongest characteristic Raman signal for the sandwich complexes was obtained when the volume of Au/Fe3+ NCs added was 30 μL (Figure 4d). This result also demonstrated specific binding between E. coli O157:H7 and Au/Fe3+ NCs.

3.4. High-Performance SERS Detection of E. coli O157:H7

The formation of capture probe–pathogen–Au/Fe3+ NCs sandwich complexes was also confirmed by TEM imaging (Figure 5a). The magnified TEM images of the square area showed that the MNPs and Au/Fe3+ NCs were linked to the surface of E. coli O157:H7. The stability and specificity of the capture probes contributed to the sensitive detection of the pathogens. The capture capability of the antibody-modified MNPs was confirmed by traditional plate counting, according to previous work [19]. The detection of E. coli O157:H7 was carried out under the optimized conditions.
The favorable linear concentration range was explored using gradient concentrations (101–108 cfu/mL) of E. coli O157:H7 and monitoring the Raman peak of PB at 2150 cm−1 (Figure 5b). The Raman signal intensity grew rapidly with increasing pathogen concentration from 101 to 106 cfu/mL. With the increasing amount of E. coli O157:H7, more NCs containing Fe3+ and Au NPs could be separated via “sandwich” structure. Correspondingly, much more PB will produce to generate higher Raman signal. There was a strong linear correlation between the intensity of the Raman signal and the logarithm of the concentration of E. coli O157:H7 (y = 487.77x + 152.84, R2 = 0.9915), with an LOD value of 2 cfu/mL (Figure 5c). The limit of detection (LOD) was calculated according to the formula LOD = 3N/S, where N is the standard deviation of measurements of a blank sample and S is the slope of the standard curve. These results demonstrate that the biosensor was sufficiently sensitive for quantitative detection of E. coli O157:H7. The detection sensitivity was determined by the high specificity of antibodies. Antibodies on MNPs and NCs can recognize the respective target pathogen, and thus the dual recognition ensures detection specificity. This behavior was attributed to the high specificity of the capture probe and the synthesized Au/Fe3+ NCs, and the strong signal strength of the Raman peak.
Good reproducibility was verified by taking 18 random samples from a 102 cfu/mL suspension of E. coli O157:H7; an RSD of 6.94% was obtained (Figure 5d). To demonstrate the specificity of the biosensor, E. coli, S. typhimurium, S. aureus, and V. parahemolyticus were used as interference bacteria. The signal intensities with E. coli O157:H7 were almost five-fold stronger than those of the nontarget pathogens (Figure 5e). Furthermore, E. coli O157:H7 was precisely detected in mixed samples, which was attributed to the high specific affinity of the Au/Fe3+ NCs and capture probes for the target pathogen. Good reproducibility and specificity confirmed the reliability of our detection method.
To further investigate the applicability of the SERS biosensor for E. coli O157:H7 in practical use, tap water, lettuce, and chicken were used as models, and our detection results were compared to the classic plate-counting method as a standard [15]. Table 1 shows that the recovery rate for E. coli O157:H7 ranged from 93.60% to 97.50%, indicating applicability and good accuracy of the proposed biosensor for the quantification of E. coli O157:H7 in food samples. These results further demonstrate the biorecognition specificity of Au/Fe3+ NCs. Compared to other reports concerning the use of NCs for pathogen detection, for which fluorescent and colorimetric methods are commonly used [20,24], our SERS biosensor method is applicable and sensitive for pathogen detection (Table 2). The lower LOD values and wider linear range observed with our biosensor confirmed its outstanding quantitative performance, which is attributed to the novel Au/Fe3+ NCs for the following reasons: (1) high specificity of antibodies on the surface of porous spongy Au/Fe3+ NCs due to big specific area; (2) the background-free and sharp single characteristic Raman peak of PB produced by Fe3+; and (3) the strong Raman signal enhancement by GNPs in Au/Fe3+ NCs. In addition, antibodies to other kinds of target (e.g., S. typhimurium, cancer cells or inflammatory factors) could be used for magnetic nanoparticles modification and nanocluster fabrication. Correspondingly, the SERS biosensor detection of these targets could be realized. Furthermore, in conjunction with portable Raman equipment, there is the possibility of on-site pathogen detection.

4. Conclusions

Sensitive SERS detection of E. coli O157:H7 was achieved using a biosensor containing novel Au/Fe3+ NCs, which were synthesized from GNPs, BSA, FeCl3, PBS, and antibodies. The porous spongy Au/Fe3+ NCs increased the Raman signal intensity of PB, which was formed from the release of Fe3+ after treatment with HCl, and from Fe2+ in potassium ferrocyanide. The Raman signal from Prussian blue rather than from E. coli O157:H7 was further enhanced by the GNPs. The Au/Fe3+ NCs also exhibited specific biorecognition capacity due to the attached antibodies, which boosted detection sensitivity. Specific separation and enrichment of target pathogens was facilitated by monoclonal antibody-modified MNPs. This biosensor was characterized by a good quantitative response between the Raman signal intensity and logarithm of the concentration of E. coli O157:H7 over the range of 101–106 cfu/mL, with an LOD value of 2 cfu/mL. The recovery rates from three spiked food samples ranged from 93.60% to 97.50%, demonstrating the potential of the biosensor method for effective detection of E. coli O157:H7 and early screening of contaminated food. This biosensor, benefiting from the porous spongy structured Au/Fe3+ NCs, may become a universal tool for effective, sensitive, and specific detection of various foodborne pathogens.

Author Contributions

Y.L.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft. F.G.: Investigation, Methodology, Verification. C.L.: Methodology, Verification, Writing—review & editing. M.-L.F.: Writing—review & editing. J.Z.: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing—review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 32072181 and 31901776). We also appreciate the financial support from Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (CAAS-ASTIP-2021-IFST-SN2021-05), Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (No. Y2019PT20-01), and Elite Youth Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences ([email protected]).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Jiang, T.; Song, Y.; Wei, T.; Li, H.; Du, D.; Zhu, M.J.; Lin, Y. Sensitive detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 using Pt-Au bimetal nanoparticles with peroxidase-like amplification. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 77, 687–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Khalil, I.A.; Troeger, C.; Blacker, B.F.; Rao, P.C.; Brown, A.; Atherly, D.E.; Brewer, T.G.; Engmann, C.M.; Houpt, E.R.; Kang, G.; et al. Morbidity and mortality due to shigella and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli diarrhoea: The Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2016. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 1229–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Zhao, X.; Lin, C.W.; Wang, J.; Oh, D.H. Advances in rapid detection methods for foodborne pathogens. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 24, 297–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Yeni, F.; Acar, S.; Polat, Ö.G.; Soyer, Y.; Alpas, H. Rapid and standardized methods for detection of foodborne pathogens and mycotoxins on fresh produce. Food Control 2014, 40, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Min, F.; Yong, Q.; Wang, W.; Hua, K.; Wang, L.; Xu, C. Development of a monoclonal antibody-based ELISA to detect Escherichia coli O157:H7. Food Agric. Immunol. 2013, 24, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, J.; Andler, S.M.; Goddard, J.M.; Nugen, S.R.; Rotello, V.M. Integrating recognition elements with nanomaterials for bacteria sensing. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 1272–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, S.J.; Zheng, J.K.; He, L.L. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) combined techniques for high-performance detection and characterization. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2017, 90, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zheng, J.K.; He, L.L. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for the chemical analysis of food. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jayan, H.; Pu, H.; Sun, D.W. Recent developments in Raman spectral analysis of microbial single cells: Techniques and applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lu, C.; Tang, L.H.; Gao, F.; Li, Y.Z.; Liu, J.W.; Zheng, J.K. DNA-encoded bimetallic Au-Pt dumbbell nanozyme for high-performance detection and eradication of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 187, 113327–113337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lin, D.; Qin, T.; Wang, Y.; Sun, X.; Chen, L. Graphene oxide wrapped SERS tags: Multifunctional platforms toward optical labeling, photothermal ablation of bacteria, and the monitoring of killing effect. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 1320–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, A.; Bi, J.; Yang, S.; Zhang, J.; Chen, A.; Liang, S. Highly surface-roughened caterpillar-like Au/Ag nanotubes for sensitive and reproducible substrates for surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 45856–45861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, J.F.; Wu, X.J.; Wang, C.W.; Rong, Z.; Ding, H.M.; Li, H.; Li, S.H.; Shao, N.S.; Dong, P.T.; Xiao, R.; et al. Facile synthesis of au-coated magnetic nanoparticles and their application in bacteria detection via a sers method. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 19958–19967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tamer, U.; Boyac, I.H.; Temur, E.; Zengin, A.; Dincer, I.; Elerman, Y. Fabrication of magnetic gold nanorod particles for immunomagnetic separation and SERS application. J. Nanopart. Res. 2011, 13, 3167–3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, H.; Ma, X.Y.; Liu, Y.; Duan, N.; Wu, S.; Wang, Z.P.; Xu, B.C. Gold nanoparticles enhanced SERS aptasensor for the simultaneous detection of Salmonella typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 74, 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ouyang, L.; Ren, W.; Zhu, L.; Irudayaraj, J. Prosperity to challenges: Recent approaches in SERS substrate fabrication. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2017, 36, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, L.; Yin, H.; Ma, W.; Kuang, H.; Wang, L.; Xu, C. Ultrasensitive SERS detection of mercury based on the assembled gold nanochains. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 67, 472–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, S.S.; Lu, C.; Li, Y.Z.; Xue, L.; Zhao, C.Y.; Tian, G.F.; Bao, Y.M.; Tang, L.H.; Lin, J.H.; Zheng, J.K. Gold nanobones enhanced ultrasensitive surface-enhanced Raman scattering aptasensor for detecting Escherichia coli O157:H7. ACS Sens. 2020, 5, 588–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, Y.Z.; Lu, C.; Zhou, S.S.; Fauconnier, M.-L.; Gao, F.; Fan, B.; Lin, J.H.; Wang, F.Z.; Zheng, J.K. Sensitive and simultaneous detection of different pathogens by surface-enhanced Raman scattering based on aptamer and Raman reporter co-mediated gold tags. Sens. Actuators B 2020, 317, 128182–128192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, H.L.; Xue, L.; Huang, F.; Wang, S.; Wang, L.; Liu, N.; Lin, J.H. A capillary biosensor for rapid detection of Salmonella using Fe-nanocluster amplification and smart phone imaging. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 127, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Laurier, K.G.; Vermoortele, F.; Ameloot, R.; De Vos, D.E.; Hofkens, J.; Roeffaers, M.B. Iron(III)-based metal-organic frameworks as visible light photocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 14488–14491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xie, J.P.; Zheng, Y.G.; Ying, J.Y. Protein-directed synthesis of highly fluorescent gold nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 888–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ge, J.; Lei, J.; Zare, R.N. Protein-inorganic hybrid nanoflowers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 428–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guo, R.Y.; Wang, S.; Huang, F.C.; Chen, Q.; Li, Y.; Liao, M.; Lin, J.H. Rapid detection of Salmonella Typhimurium using magnetic nanoparticle immunoseparation, nanocluster signal amplification and smartphone image analysis. Sens. Actuators B 2019, 284, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lin, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Yin, Y.; Hu, W.; Liu, W.; Yang, H. Facile synthesis of enzyme-inorganic hybrid nanoflowers and its application as a colorimetric platform for visual detection of hydrogen peroxide and phenol. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 10775–10782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sun, J.; Ge, J.; Liu, W.; Lan, M.; Zhang, H.; Wang, P.; Wang, Y.; Niu, Z. Multi-enzyme co-embedded organic-inorganic hybrid nanoflowers: Synthesis and application as a colorimetric sensor. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Y.; Xie, G.; Qiu, J.; Zhou, D.; Gou, D.; Tao, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, H. A new biosensor based on the recognition of phages and the signal amplification of organic-inorganic hybrid nanoflowers for discriminating and quantitating live pathogenic bacteria in urine. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 258, 803–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, L.; Huo, X.; Guo, R.; Zhang, Q.; Lin, J. Exploring protein-inorganic hybrid nanoflowers and immune magnetic nanobeads to detect Salmonella typhimurium. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Cheng, D.; Yu, M.; Fu, F.; Han, W.; Li, G.; Xie, J.; Song, Y.; Swihart, M.T.; Song, E. Dual recognition strategy for specific and sensitive detection of bacteria using aptamer-coated magnetic beads and antibiotic-capped gold nanoclusters. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 820–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yin, Y.; Li, Q.; Ma, S.; Liu, H.; Dong, B.; Yang, J.; Liu, D. Prussian blue as a highly sensitive and background-free resonant Raman reporter. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 1551–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Turkevich, J.; Stevenson, P.C.; Hillier, J. The formation of colloidal gold. J. Phys. Chem. C 1953, 57, 670–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Szekeres, G.P.; Kneipp, J. Different binding sites of serum albumins in the protein corona of gold nanoparticles. Analyst 2018, 143, 6061–6068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Matei, I.; Buta, C.M.; Turcu, I.M.; Culita, D.; Munteanu, C.; Ionita, G. Formation and stabilization of gold nanoparticles in bovine serum albumin solution. Molecules 2019, 24, 3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Davidson, A.M.; Brust, M.; Cooper, D.L.; Volk, M. Sensitive analysis of protein adsorption to colloidal gold by differential centrifugal sedimentation. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 6807–6814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Dokmanic, I.; Sikic, M.; Tomic, S. Metals in proteins: Correlation between the metal-ion type, coordination number and the amino-acid residues involved in the coordination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2008, 64, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zheng, H.; Cooper, D.R.; Porebski, P.J.; Shabalin, I.G.; Handing, K.B.; Minor, W. CheckMyMetal: A macromolecular metal-binding validation tool. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 2017, 73, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the SERS detection biosensor. (a) Principle of the one-pot synthesis of Au/Fe3+ NCs from PBS, BSA, FeCl3, Au nanoparticles, and antibodies and (b) separation and detection of E. coli O157:H7.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the SERS detection biosensor. (a) Principle of the one-pot synthesis of Au/Fe3+ NCs from PBS, BSA, FeCl3, Au nanoparticles, and antibodies and (b) separation and detection of E. coli O157:H7.
Biosensors 11 00354 g001
Figure 2. Characterization of Au/Fe3+ NCs. (a) HRTEM images and energy dispersive spectrometry images of Au/Fe3+ NCs; P = PBS, Fe = FeCl3, N = BSA and antibody, Au = gold nanoparticle. (b) TEM images of Au/Fe3+ NCs and synthesized products with one reagent missing. (c) Ultraviolet absorption spectra of Au nanoparticles, BSA, and Au/Fe3+ NCs. (d) Raman enhancement by Au/Fe3+ NCs after metathesis reaction.
Figure 2. Characterization of Au/Fe3+ NCs. (a) HRTEM images and energy dispersive spectrometry images of Au/Fe3+ NCs; P = PBS, Fe = FeCl3, N = BSA and antibody, Au = gold nanoparticle. (b) TEM images of Au/Fe3+ NCs and synthesized products with one reagent missing. (c) Ultraviolet absorption spectra of Au nanoparticles, BSA, and Au/Fe3+ NCs. (d) Raman enhancement by Au/Fe3+ NCs after metathesis reaction.
Biosensors 11 00354 g002
Figure 3. Hypothesis and verification of the synthesis process of Au/Fe3+ NCs. (a) Schematic illustration of the proposed synthesis of Au/Fe3+ NCs and (b) scanning electron microscope images of the steps.
Figure 3. Hypothesis and verification of the synthesis process of Au/Fe3+ NCs. (a) Schematic illustration of the proposed synthesis of Au/Fe3+ NCs and (b) scanning electron microscope images of the steps.
Biosensors 11 00354 g003
Figure 4. Optimization of the SERS biosensor. Effects of (a) Fe3+ concentration on Au/Fe3+ NCs, (b) Au nanoparticle concentration on Au/Fe3+ NCs, (c) HCl concentration on E. coli O157:H7 detection, and (d) the volume of Au/Fe3+ NCs on E. coli O157:H7 detection.
Figure 4. Optimization of the SERS biosensor. Effects of (a) Fe3+ concentration on Au/Fe3+ NCs, (b) Au nanoparticle concentration on Au/Fe3+ NCs, (c) HCl concentration on E. coli O157:H7 detection, and (d) the volume of Au/Fe3+ NCs on E. coli O157:H7 detection.
Biosensors 11 00354 g004
Figure 5. Bio-specificity of the capture probes and Au/Fe3+ NCs. (a) TEM image of capture probe–E. coli O157:H7–Au/Fe3+ NC sandwich complexes and corresponding magnified image obtained from the square area, (b) SERS spectrum for a series of concentrations of E. coli. O157:H7, (c) linear correlation between the logarithms of E. coli. O157:H7 concentration and SERS peak intensities at 2150 cm−1, (d) Raman intensities of 18 separately measured random samples from a 102 cfu/mL suspension of E. coli. O157:H7, and (e) Raman intensities for E. coli O157:H7, three interfering bacteria, and their mixture.
Figure 5. Bio-specificity of the capture probes and Au/Fe3+ NCs. (a) TEM image of capture probe–E. coli O157:H7–Au/Fe3+ NC sandwich complexes and corresponding magnified image obtained from the square area, (b) SERS spectrum for a series of concentrations of E. coli. O157:H7, (c) linear correlation between the logarithms of E. coli. O157:H7 concentration and SERS peak intensities at 2150 cm−1, (d) Raman intensities of 18 separately measured random samples from a 102 cfu/mL suspension of E. coli. O157:H7, and (e) Raman intensities for E. coli O157:H7, three interfering bacteria, and their mixture.
Biosensors 11 00354 g005
Table 1. Comparison of the detection of E. coli O157:H7 in three real samples between the surface-enhanced Raman scattering biosensor and classic plate counting.
Table 1. Comparison of the detection of E. coli O157:H7 in three real samples between the surface-enhanced Raman scattering biosensor and classic plate counting.
Spiked Concentration (cfu/mL)Plate Counting Method (cfu/mL)This Method
(cfu/mL)
Recovery Rate
(%)
Tap water1000906 ± 70968 ± 8993.60
Lettuce15001486 ± 301418 ± 11395.25
Chicken15001633 ± 311674 ± 8397.50
Table 2. Comparison of the detection method, target pathogens, limit of detection (LOD), and detection time of this study with related detection material in other reports.
Table 2. Comparison of the detection method, target pathogens, limit of detection (LOD), and detection time of this study with related detection material in other reports.
MethodsMaterialsTargetLOD (cfu/mL)Detection TimeRef.
SERSAuMNPs core/shell nanocompositesS. aureus10~120 min[13]
SERSGold nanoparticlesS. typhimurium & S. aureus15 & 35~150 min[15]
Electrochemical biosensorGOx&HRP-Cu3(PO4)2 hybrid nanoflowersE. coli1~140 min[7]
Hue-saturation-lightness color space Fe-nanoclusters S. typhimurium14[20]
Hue-saturation-lightness color space Immune GOx–nanoclustersS. typhimurium16[24]
SERSNanoclusterE. coli O157:H72 ~30 minThis study
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Gao, F.; Lu, C.; Fauconnier, M.-L.; Zheng, J. Bio-Specific Au/Fe3+ Porous Spongy Nanoclusters for Sensitive SERS Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Biosensors 2021, 11, 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11100354

AMA Style

Li Y, Gao F, Lu C, Fauconnier M-L, Zheng J. Bio-Specific Au/Fe3+ Porous Spongy Nanoclusters for Sensitive SERS Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Biosensors. 2021; 11(10):354. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11100354

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yuzhi, Fei Gao, Chang Lu, Marie-Laure Fauconnier, and Jinkai Zheng. 2021. "Bio-Specific Au/Fe3+ Porous Spongy Nanoclusters for Sensitive SERS Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7" Biosensors 11, no. 10: 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11100354

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop