Next Article in Journal
Microfluidic Strategies for Extracellular Vesicle Isolation: Towards Clinical Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Information Content for Determining the Vascular Tone Type of the Lower Extremities in Varicose Veins: A Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
Improved Split TEV GPCR β-arrestin-2 Recruitment Assays via Systematic Analysis of Signal Peptide and β-arrestin Binding Motif Variants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multifrequency Microwave Radiometry for Characterizing the Internal Temperature of Biological Tissues
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biosensors
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/bios13010049
biosensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synergistic Effect of Composite Nickel Phosphide Nanoparticles and Carbon Fiber on the Enhancement of Salivary Enzyme-Free Glucose Sensing

by
Tania P. Brito
1,2,3,
Nicole Butto-Miranda
4,
Andrónico Neira-Carrillo
4,
Soledad Bollo
1,* and
Domingo Ruíz-León
2,*
1
Centro de Investigación de Procesos Redox (CiPRex), Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8330015, Chile
2
Laboratorio de Fisicoquímica y Electroquímica del Estado Sólido, Facultad de Química y Biología, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago 8330015, Chile
3
Departamento de Ingeniería Metalúrgica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago 8330015, Chile
4
Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas Animales, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8330015, Chile
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2023, 13(1), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13010049
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 16 December 2022 / Accepted: 22 December 2022 / Published: 29 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biophysical Sensors for Biomedical/Health Monitoring Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
An electrospinning method was used for the preparation of an in situ composite based on Ni2P nanoparticles and carbon fiber (FC). The material was tested for the first time against direct glucose oxidation reaction. The Ni2P nanoparticles were distributed homogeneously throughout the carbon fibers with a composition determined by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of 40 wt% Ni2P and 60 wt% carbon fiber without impurities in the sample. The electrochemical measurement results indicate that the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ sensor exhibits excellent catalytic activity compared to the GCE/Ni2P and GCE/FC/Ni2P ex situ electrodes. The GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ sensor presents a sensitivity of 1050 µAmM−1cm−2 in the range of 5–208 µM and a detection limit of 0.25 µM. The sensor was applied for glucose detection in artificial saliva, with a low interference observed from normally coexisting electroactive species. In conclusion, our sensor represents a novel and analytical competitive alternative for the development of non-enzymatic glucose sensors in the future.

1. Introduction

The measurement of glucose through reliable methods is a very relevant issue due to its increased demand for medical diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM). Thus, its early detection will improve the quality of life in patients, considering that DM leads to many deaths worldwide [1]. Many sensors have been developed to monitor glucose levels in patients with DM. Currently, commercial electrochemical glucose sensors are invasive, due to the need for a blood sample, and are based on enzymatic proteins as recognition elements, with glucose oxidase being the most commonly used. Despite their high sensitivity and selectivity, these sensors have a high cost and are unstable with changes in temperature, pH, and humidity due to the enzymes used, making their practical applications difficult [2,3]. To avoid these drawbacks, it is of great importance to develop sensitive and selective non-enzymatic sensors for glucose detection in less painful or non-invasive matrixes. The non-enzymatic glucose sensors have emerged as a new development alternative. Their performance, together with that of enzymatic biosensors, has been recently reviewed by Nor et al., remarking that they “have an excellent sensitivity, good stability and ease of manufacture, and their current response is directly dependent on the oxidation of glucose on the modified electrode” [3].
Noble metals and their metal alloys possess high catalytic activity for the non-enzymatic electrooxidation of glucose, but the high cost of such catalysts limits their widespread applications [4]. Alternatively, the use of abundant elements on earth, such as some transition metals and their oxides and hydroxides, is a very attractive option for electrocatalytic glucose detection. However, despite being cheaper, the widespread use of metal oxide-based sensors is hampered mainly by their low electrical conductivity. To avoid this problem, hybrid materials based on inorganic salts coupled to conductive substrates such as graphene, nanotubes, and carbon nanofibers have been designed [5,6,7,8]. As a result, these materials acquire a greater surface area and a more effective electron transfer. Another strategy is based on the search for ceramic materials with higher intrinsic electrical conductivity, such as transition metal phosphides. Recently, these compounds have drawn attention due to their excellent chemical and physical stability, as well as their great catalytic activity, comparable to that of noble metals, in different applications [9,10,11]. However, the study of these compounds in the area of non-enzymatic sensors has been explored less.
Nickel is an attractive transition metal for the electrooxidation of glucose with high catalytic activities. The efficacy of glucose sensors based on Ni oxides and hydroxides has been extensively demonstrated in the literature [12,13,14,15]. In general terms, the use of these Ni oxides involves potentials closer to 0.6 V with reported detection limits in the range of 5 to 20 micromolar, even when combined with carbon nanomaterials. In the last few years, nickel phosphide (Ni2P) has emerged as a new material due to its abundance in the earth’s crust, excellent chemical stability, good electrical conductivity, and high catalytic activity. It has been used as catalysts in the reactions of hydrodesulfurization [16], hydrodenitrogenation [16], and evolution of hydrogen [9,17,18,19], where catalytic activities have been obtained close to that of noble metals [17]. Moreover, Ni2P has been applied in photocatalytic degradation, and in lithium-ion batteries [20]. Regarding glucose sensors based on Ni2P specifically, there are only three reports in the literature with two involving carbon materials: Ni2P nanosheets supported on carbon cloth, Ni2P NA/CC [21] and Ni2P(MOF)/Graphene [22]. The third one corresponds to Ni2P nanosheets on a nickel foam, Ni2P/NF [23]. All of them show good sensitivities and a low limit of detection and were applied for monitoring blood glucose.
In this work, the electrospinning technique followed by heat treatment in an Ar/H2 atmosphere was applied to manufacture a hybrid material based on the joint synthesis of Ni2P with carbon fiber (FC/Ni2P), called in situ, to prepare a low cost new composite which has not been reported until now for glucose sensing. The in situ Ni2P/FC composite was fully characterized and applied as electrocatalytic material for salivary non-invasive diabetes monitoring. For comparison, carbon fiber and Ni2P were synthesized individually. Using these individual compounds, the effectiveness of the electrocatalytic materials of carbon fiber, Ni2P, and ex situ and in situ Ni2P/FC composites for glucose electrooxidation was compared.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

All chemicals were of analytical grade. Nickel chloride hexahydrate (NiCl2∙6H2O, Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), nickel nitrate (Ni(NO3)2∙6H2O, Merck, Darmstadt, Alemania), nickel sulfate hexadritadate (NiSO4∙6H2O, Merck), sodium phosphinate monohydrate (NaPO2H2·H2O, Merck), polyvinyl porrolidone (C6H9NO)n, PVP, MW = 1,300,000), orthophosphoric acid (H3PO4 85%, Merck), N,N dimethylformamide (C3H7NO, DMF Merck) hexamethylenediamine (C6H16N2, Merck), 0.3 and 0.05 µm aluminas (Buehler, Uzwil, Switzerland), α-D-Glucose (C6H12O6 Sigma-Aldrich), Nafion (5.0% Aldrich), Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH, Merck), Ethanol (Analytical Grade, Merck), Acetone (Analytical Grade, Merck), ethylenediamine (Merck). For the thermal treatments, H2 and Ar (Airliquide, Paris, France) were used. All electrochemical solutions were prepared with ultrapure water (ρ = 18.2 MΩ cm) from a Millipore-MilliQ system that was used for preparing all aqueous solutions.

2.2. Synthesis of Carbon Fiber (FC) and the FC/Ni2P In Situ Composite

The synthesis of carbon fiber and the in situ composite was carried out using electrospinning stretching LE-10 Fluidnatec equipment and 10 mL Nipro luer/lock syringes based on a modification work of Shu-Juan Bao et al. [18]. To prepare the electrospinning solution, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) (10% w/v of the final 250 mL solution) was mixed in 125 mL of Milli-Q water and stirred. Then, 125 mL of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) was added, and the mixture was stirred. Once this time had elapsed, 50.0 mmol of 85% H3PO4 was added slowly, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature. A homogeneous solution was finally obtained. This solution was electrospun in the electrospinning equipment using a flow of 800 µL/h, applying a voltage of 18 KV and a distance between the needle and collector of 20 cm at room temperature with a relative humidity of 70%. The collection time was approximately 12 h. Once the polymer meshes were obtained they were dried at 110 °C for 12 h. Then, the stabilization process was carried out at 250 °C for 3 h in air using a ramp of 7 °C/min, and the samples were allowed to cool to room temperature. Subsequently, the obtained fibers were calcined at 700 °C for 3 h in Ar/H2 flow using a heating rate of 10 °C/min and cooled to room temperature in an Ar atmosphere. The fibers obtained were cooled to room temperature in an Ar atmosphere.
Like the synthesis of carbon fibers, the in situ Ni2P/FC composite was synthesized using the electrospinning technique. In this case, the precursor electrospinning solution was prepared from an aqueous solution of NiSO4 (50 mmol) in 125 mL of Milli-Q water, which was stirred. PVP (10% w/v of the final 125 mL solution) was then added and stirred again. Subsequently, 125 mL of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) was added and the mixture was stirred. Once this time had elapsed, 50 mmol of 85% H3PO4 was added slowly, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature. The homogeneous solution obtained was electrospun using the same parameters as for the carbon fiber. Once the polymer meshes were obtained, the same heat treatment was carried out as for the carbon fiber.

2.3. Synthesis of Ni2P

Following the work of Qingxin Guan et al. [24], Ni2P was prepared using nickel chloride (NiCl2) and sodium hypophosphite (NaPO2H2·H2O) as precursors, which were dissolved in Milli-Q water under stirring with an Ni:P = 1:1.5 molar ratio. After stirring for 1 h, the solution was slowly evaporated at 50 °C for 8 h and then left to stand at room temperature until the precursor was obtained. The precursor was dried at 90 °C and then ground in an agate mortar. The product obtained was treated at 300 °C for 30 min in an Ar atmosphere with a heating rate of 5 °C/min. The a was cooled to room temperature under flowing Ar and washed repeatedly with Milli-Q water and ethanol. Ni2P was finally obtained after drying at 120 °C for 6 h.

2.4. Materials Characterization

The crystalline structure and purity of the obtained materials were determined from X-ray diffraction (XRD). The X-ray diffraction data were collected at room temperature on a Bruker D8 Advance (R-X: Cu tube (CuKa1 radiation = 1.5604 angstroms), filter: nickel, detector: linear LynxEye, power used: 40 KV/30 mA, and optics: variable, V20). The spectra were measured in the 2θ range between 10 and 80° (PSD step = 0.20; 10.0 s/step). The analysis of crystalline phases was performed using the Crystal ImpactMatch program with the PDF-2 database. Parameter lattices were calculated using the STOE XPOW software. The surface morphology was studied using a Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) INSPECT-F50 high-resolution scanning electron microscope (HR-SEM, FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). The compositional study was conducted by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDX) and backscattered electron (BSE) analysis, scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), and an Alpine 129 eV ultradry pathfinder (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The composition analysis of the in situ composite was carried out by thermogravimetric analysis using a TA Instruments Model Q50 thermobalance. The conditions of the experiment were a speed of 5 °C/min in air and a temperature of 30 °C to 800 °C.

2.5. Modification of Glassy Carbon Electrodes (GCEs) with the Materials

For the modification of glassy carbon electrodes, the drop casting technique was used. Dispersions of 2.0 mg/mL of the synthesized materials dissolved in 0.2% Nafion in isopropanol and water were prepared. For the case of the ex situ Ni2P/FC composite, the ratios were massed with 60 wt% FC, which corresponds to a concentration of 2.0 mg/mL. All dispersions were sonicated for 1 h. Before each modification, the glassy carbon electrode must be polished. The electrode was polished in 0.3 and 0.05 µm alumina and then washed with Milli-Q water. Ten microliters of the dispersion were taken and deposited on the surface of a glassy carbon electrode and then dried at 50 °C for 10 min. Scheme 1 illustrates the preparation, both of carbonized nanofiber composites and modified electrodes, successively.

2.6. Electrochemical Measurements

To explore the catalytic activity of the modified electrodes, a typical three-electrode system composed of a glassy carbon working electrode (CH Instrument, Bee Cave, TX, USA, 3 mm diameter), an Ag/AgCl reference electrode in 3 mol L−1 NaCl (CH Instrument), and an auxiliary platinum wire electrode was arranged in an electrochemical cell with a capacity of 10 mL in a MultiEmStat Potentiostat (Palmsens BV, Houten, The Netherlands). All electrochemical measurements were carried out in triplicate by immersing the modified electrode in 5 mL of 0.1 M NaOH as the supporting electrolyte.
The CV curves were measured at a scan rate of 50 mVs−1 for a potential range comprised between 0.200 and 0.700 V. The amperometric experiments were conducted at 0.500 V by applying the desired working potential and allowing the transient currents to decay to a steady-state value prior to the addition of glucose, with subsequent current monitoring. The practical application of the proposed sensor was carried out performed using artificial human saliva samples (SAGF medium) that was prepared as described by Gal et al. [25] and diluted in NaOH solution before measurements.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of Materials

The crystalline structure and purity of the obtained materials were determined from X-ray diffraction (XRD). Figure 1a shows the diffraction patterns of the carbon fiber (FC), Ni2P, and in situ Ni2P/FC composite. A diffraction peak at approximately 2θ = 24°, which is characteristic of carbon fibers, can be observed in the FC diffractograms [17]. Regarding Ni2P, the diffraction pattern agrees with that of Ni2P (PDF2 no. 01-089-4864), corresponding to space group P-62m with a hexagonal crystal system and cell parameters of a = 5.87 Å, c = 3.39 Å, and cell volume = 101.20 Å3. In the phase analysis of the in situ Ni2P/FC composite, it can be seen that the diffraction peaks correspond to the FC (2θ = 24°), and Ni2P (PDF2 no. 01-089-4864) diffraction planes. The Ni2P contained in the composite has a hexagonal crystal system with space group P-62m (189), whose cell parameters are a = 5.85 Å, b = 3.37 Å, and cell volume of 100.19 Å3. For all materials, no additional planes were observed that could be attributable to contaminants or unreacted precursors. Therefore, the proposed materials were successfully obtained from the electrospinning technique, and the thermal treatment used was effective. The Ni2P crystallite size of the individual compound and the in situ composite were obtained from the Debye Scherrer equation, corresponding to 17.13 ± 3.1 nm and 12.09 ± 1.5 nm, respectively. A very similar crystallite size was obtained in both materials. The particle size of individual Ni2P and that in the composite were studied from STEM images (Figure S1). From a Gaussian distribution analysis, an average particle size of 23.91 nm ± 1.9 nm for individual Ni2P and 29.10 ± 2.2 nm for Ni2P in the composite were determined.
Figure 1b,c shows the SEM images of the carbon fiber and in situ FC/Ni2P composite, respectively. Thus, it is possible to distinguish that the obtained fibers in both the carbon fiber and composite have a morphology of smooth threads, without pores or visible cracks. This fact implies that the stabilization and reduction treatments were carried out adequately, since these steps fulfill the function of slowly and gradually releasing volatile compounds, avoiding the formation of imperfections in the final carbon fiber [18]. The diameter of the fibers is practically the same in each step of the synthesis (Figures S2 and S3) with an average of 123 nm ± 54 nm in the bare carbon fibers and 118.0 nm ± 57 nm for the fibers in the composite, which could also be a consequence of the effective and gradual stabilization treatment.
The distribution of Ni2P onto the carbon fiber is essential for electrocatalytic applications of sensors, and the composite is analyzed by back-scattered electron (BSE) microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) elemental mapping analysis techniques. Figure 1d corresponds to the BSE images of the in situ FC/Ni2P composite. The observed bright spots indicate a homogeneous distribution of Ni2P all over the carbon fibers. The image is then mapped using EDX analysis, identifying nickel, phosphorus and carbon, in Figure 1e–g, respectively. Both Ni and P were identified and merged with the carbon matrix. On the other hand, from an EDX analysis per point, indicated in Figure 2, the average atomic percentage ratio between Ni:P was 2.13:1.0 (Figure S4 and Table S1), which is very close to the ratio 2.0:1.0 in the theoretical Ni2P. These analyses demonstrate the formation of Ni2P nanoparticles throughout the carbon fiber distributed homogeneously.
The determination of the composition of Ni2P and carbon fiber in the in situ composite was carried out employing thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) (Figure S5). The entire process initially includes the release of 8.3% by weight of water; then the decomposition of the organic matrix begins, which corresponds to 50.6% by weight. Based on the above, approximately 60 wt% carbon fiber is present, and the remaining 40 wt% is assigned to the inorganic material. This composition percentage was then used for the comparative electroanalytical tests to prepare the ex situ FC/Ni2P composite.

3.2. Electrocatalytic Performance toward Glucose

The electrocatalytic behavior of modified glassy carbon electrodes was analyzed using cyclic voltammetry in the presence and absence of 1.00 mM glucose, using a potential range of 0.200 to 0.700 V in 0.100 M NaOH solution. The voltammograms obtained using the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ, GCE/FC/Ni2P ex situ and GCE/Ni2P modified electrodes (Figure 3a–c, respectively) show that in the absence of glucose (black lines), a redox process occurs close to 0.450–0.500 V. According to the literature, we assign this process to the nickel Ni2+/Ni3+ redox process [9,10]. On the other hand, when the GCE/FC electrode is used no current response is observed in the potential range analyzed (Figure 3d). Moreover, when the pH was changed to 10 and 11 no signals were observed using either composite (Figure S6 for GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ electrode). In an alkaline medium the formation of the NiOx/Ni(OH)x species on the Ni2P surface has been demonstrated, so it is reasonable to conclude that the observed peaks are derived from the surface faradaic reaction between the NiOx/Ni(OH)x species and NiOOH [23], according to:
NiOx/Ni(OH)x + OH−1 → NiOOH + e−
In the presence of 1.00 mM glucose, a remarkable increase in anodic current density is observed for the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ electrode followed by the GCE/FC/Ni2P ex situ electrode, indicating that glucose electrooxidation was catalyzed effectively by these materials. In the case of the GCE/Ni2P electrode, the presence of glucose causes a small increase in the current density, showing that the presence of carbon fiber in the sensor improves the catalytic activity presented by Ni2P. As mentioned above, once the electrode is in a basic medium the formation of Ni(OH)x and NiOOH species is possible on the Ni2P surface. Thus, when the applied oxidation potential is close to 0.500 V, NiOx/Ni(OH)x species are electrochemically oxidized to NiOOH, which oxidizes glucose to gluconolactone [26,27]. The oxidation of glucose due to the electrocatalytic activity of NiOOH can be expressed by the following formulation:
NiOOH + glucose → NiOx/Ni(OH)x + H2O + gluconolactone + e−
Therefore, the electro-oxidation of glucose is dependent on the formation of hydroxide species on the surface of the electrode and therefore on the pH in this system.
From the cyclic voltammetry study it is possible to point out that the in situ GCE/FC/Ni2P electrode provides a greater electrocatalytic effect for the oxidation of glucose under the conditions studied. The characteristics of this composite provide a greater synergistic effect between Ni2P and the carbon fiber. A greater interaction between its components, as well as a completely homogeneous distribution of Ni2P nanoparticles throughout the carbon material, is the main descriptor.
The influence of the scan rate on the electrochemical behavior was studied in the presence of glucose (1.00 mM). As shown in Figure S7a, the current intensities increase progressively with the scan rate for the 1.00 mM glucose solutions. A linear relationship between the logarithmic plot of current vs. scan rate is observed. The slope with a value of 0.600 indicates that the glucose oxidation process is mainly diffusion controlled. This is confirmed from the linear fit (R2 = 0.990) between the current density and the square root of the scan rate (Figure S7b).

3.3. Electroanalytical Studies

The first optimized parameters for obtaining the most sensitive responses to glucose detection were the applied potential and the pH medium. Figure 4a shows the hydrodynamic voltammogram in the presence of 300 µM glucose in 0.100 M NaOH in a range of potentials between 0.400 V and 0.550 V obtained with the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ modified electrode. It can be seen that at 0.500 V, a considerably high current density concomitant with the smallest standard deviation was obtained. Additionally, the background current for 0.500 V was very low (data not shown) in comparison with the background for 0.550 V. In this way, a potential of 0.500 V was chosen as the optimal working potential for glucose detection in the following experiments.
The working pH is an important factor in the glucose oxidation reaction, so the electrochemical response of GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ after the addition of 300 µM glucose was investigated over a range of pH values from 10 to 13. From Figure 4b, it is observed that the anodic current density increases from pH 12 to 13 and is practically null at lower pH values. To corroborate that no electrochemical signal is obtained by amperometry at low pH values, cyclic voltammetry was performed over a wide range of potentials (Figure S3). The results show no signals related to glucose oxidation, proving the necessity of a highly basic environment for the occurrence of redox processes. On the other hand, the oxygen evolution reaction has been observed at higher pH values (pH ≈ 14) when metal phosphide catalysts are used [28]. Considering this, pH 13 was chosen as the optimal value for this study.
Using 0.500 V in a 0.100 M NaOH solution, the comparative amperometric response of GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ, GCE/FC/Ni2P ex situ, and GCE/Ni2P electrodes was studied (Figure 5a). All electrodes present a fast amperometric response toward glucose sensing, reaching a stable current density in less than 5 s. The comparative analysis clearly shows that the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ electrode has the most sensitive response against glucose electrodetection. An excellent linear relationship in the range of 19.8–150 µM (Figure 5b) was obtained, reaching a sensitivity of 1005 µAmM−1cm−2 (R2 = 0.998). In addition, with this sensor, the lowest detection and quantification limits (taken as 3.3 σ/S for detection limit and 10 σ/S for quantification limit, where σ is the standard deviation of the blank signal and S the sensitivity), as indicated in Table 1, were obtained.
A clear synergistic effect between the carbon fiber and Ni2P nanoparticles is observed, and both Ni2P/FC composites, in situ and ex situ, reach higher sensitivities than the GCE/Ni2P electrode. Considering that both composites have the same Ni2P:FC weight ratio (4:6), the homogeneous distribution of Ni2P nanoparticles onto the carbon fiber in the in situ route of synthesis should explain the greater effect observed. Finally, the linear response as a function of glucose concentration for the GCE/Ni2P sensor is more limited, exhibiting a dramatic loss of response after multiple glucose injections, which can be attributed to the saturation of the active sites.
Exploring the response of the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ sensor with the addition of different concentrations of glucose, it can be observed from Figure 5c,d that the sensor has a linear response even at concentrations as low as 5 µM and continues responding to additions of 20 and 200 µM. The calibration curve of this sensor (Figure 5d) shows two concentration ranges with an excellent linear relationship between the current response and the glucose concentration. The sensor showed a sensitivity of 1050 µAmM−1cm−2 with a linear range of 5–208 µM (R2 = 0.998) and a response time of 2 s. The detection and quantification limits were 0.25 µM and 0.76 µM, respectively. At higher concentrations (208–563 µM), there is still a linear but less sensitive response (702 µAmM−1cm−2).

3.4. Sensor Stability and Interfering Studies

The long-term stability of the sensor was also studied for practical applications. The GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ electrode was stored at room temperature, and the electrochemical response toward glucose was determined every 5 days for up to 30 days of storage. As shown in Figure 6a, the sensor retains 89.2% ± 6.4% of its initial current density after 15 days of storage. Furthermore, there is only a 13.7% decrease in its initial current density after 30 days of storage under ambient conditions, indicating high long-term stability.
Interference in the glucose oxidation response by other molecules present in the matrix to be analyzed is one of the main challenges in glucose sensing. In general, according to the literature, the normal glucose level in humans is more than ten times higher than that of common interferents [3]. The amperometric responses of the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ electrode to the addition of 100 µM glucose before and after the addition of 10 µM ascorbic acid (AA), uric acid (AU), lactose, urea, and NaCl were evaluated. Figure 6b shows that the sensor has a high response for glucose with and without interferents, and there is no response toward interfering species. Therefore, it is verified that the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ sensor is highly selective toward glucose concentrations.

3.5. Glucose Determination in Artificial Human Saliva

To assess the feasibility of the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ sensor for glucose analysis in real samples, its accuracy in artificial human saliva (SAGF medium) was evaluated through amperometry recovery tests. A salivary glucose concentration of 150 µM corresponds to normal glucose levels in nondiabetic patients [29,30,31].
The samples were diluted in 0.100 M NaOH, resulting in final glucose concentrations of 18.0 µM in the cell at pH 13. Figure S8a represents the corresponding amperometric responses of the sensor. The first addition corresponds to the glucose sample in artificial saliva, followed by four standard additions of 100 µM glucose at the aforementioned glucose concentration. The current densities increase with the successive addition of glucose. The recovery percentage was 135.8% ± 1.8% of the theoretical glucose concentration levels tested. Although the recovery values are higher than 100%, the low error values obtained demonstrate the good precision and feasibility of the proposed sensor for the non-enzymatic determination of glucose in human saliva.
A performance comparison of the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ electrode with other glucose sensors based on different nickel compounds, metal phosphides, and carbon fibers is summarized in Table 2.
Regarding glucose sensors based on Ni2P specifically [21,23], our work reports similar analytical performance but differs in several aspects such as synthesis of the composite (FC/Ni2P) in situ, nature of the carbon material, precursor of the carbon material, morphology and distribution of Ni2P nanoparticles on the carbon matrix, and applicability of the sensor in the detection of glucose on an artificial saliva matrix. Concerning the different nickel compounds, Ni(OH)2 and NiO have been extensively investigated for sensor applications. Ni(OH)2-based sensors usually involve potentials higher than ours, such as those reported by Guo et al. [32] and Yue Zhang et al. [33]. In addition, the latter, being analogous to our work due to the use of glassy carbon electrodes, rGO/Ni(OH)2/GCE, presents lower sensitivity and a higher detection limit compared to our results. On the other hand, NiO-based sensors, such as MWCNT/ NiO [34] and CPE/MWCNT/NiO [35], present considerably higher detection limits (2.0 μM and 19.0 μM, respectively). Compared to the different metal phosphides used in glucose sensors, Ni5P4/GCE [36] and Co2P/NPCNT/GCE [37], our sensor has higher sensitivity and lower detection limit. Another aspect important to remark is that our sensor requires a lower working potential compared to Ni2P-Cu3P/GCE [38] and Co2P/NPCNT/GCE sensors [37]. This comparison demonstrates the potential of nickel phosphide as an electrocatalytic material for glucose detection compared to other species of metal phosphides such as Ni5P4 and Co2P, as well as mixtures of Ni2P with oxides or other species of metal phosphides. Finally, the Table 2 also includes composites based on carbon fibers with different nickel species such as: Ni [39,40,41,42], NiCo2O4 [43,44], Ni(OH)2 [45] and CuO/NiO [46]. The comparison demonstrates that our sensor presents higher sensitivity compared to most of the works presented, except for the work of L. Liu et al. [43], however, this work uses a higher potential.
In addition, except for the work by Mei et al. [13], our sensor presents lower detection limits than these works.
Table
Table 2. Sensing performance comparison of GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ with other non-enzymatic glucose sensors.
Table 2. Sensing performance comparison of GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ with other non-enzymatic glucose sensors.
SensorSensitivity
(µAmM−1cm−2)		Detection
Limit (µM)		Linear Range
(µM)		Work
Potential (V)		Real SampleRef.
GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ10500.255–208 0.5Artificial salivaThis work
GCE /Graphene/Ni2P(MOF)72340.445–1400 0.5Human serum[22]
Carbon clothes/Ni2P Nanoarray77920.181–30000.5Human blood serum sample peach juice, and human blood[21]
Nickel Foam/Ni2P6375.10.142–937 0.5Human serum[23]
Ni2P/NiO/CeO2/Ni foam28,2300.51–250 0.5Human serum[47]
GCE/Ni2P-Cu3P47000.14–5000 0.64-[38]
GCE/Ni5P4149.60.72–5300 0.44Human serum[36]
GCE/NPCNT/Co2P338.80.882000–70000.55-[37]
Ni(OH)2/PU
PU = polyurethane		28450.3210–2060 0.6Human serum[32]
GCE/RGO/Ni(OH)2 11.436002–3100 0.6-[33]
MWCNT/NiO1768.8210–7000 0.5Human blood[34]
CPE/MWCNT/NiO6527191–14,000 0.5Human blood[35]
FTO/NiO2632.530.0845–825 0.55human saliva[13]
Ni/CFP420.412–2500 0.6-[39]
Ni/CNF mat
Carbon nanofiber		-0.572–5000 0.55Human serum[40]
Ni-MOF/RGO/CF8520.66–2090 0.62Orange juice[41]
GCE/Ni-CoO/CNF-0.030.25–600 0.5Human serum[42]
ECF/NiCo2O41947.21.55–19,175 0.55Human serum[43]
0.5 Ni/ECNF-5 h610.67302000–10,000 0.5Human serum[44]
NiO/ECNF557.688500.5
Co3O4/ECNF475.728200.6
NiCo2O4/ECNF 536.59300.55
GCE /Ni(OH)2/CNF1038.60.761000–1200 0.45Fruit juice and Human serum[45]
ACF/CuO/NiO2470.1460.25–5000 0.55Human serum[46]

4. Conclusions

In summary, the synthetic route proposed in our work allows obtaining carbon fibers from the polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer (PVP) phosphoric acid and nickel sulphate, which allowed us to develop a reproducible nanomaterial using simple and cheap reagents compared to those methods that prepare graphene, or carbon cloth used in the aforementioned works. Electroanalytical experiments show the synergy between carbon fiber and Ni2P nanoparticles, with both composites, ex situ and in situ, being more electrocatalytic for glucose oxidation than Ni2P alone. Comparing both composites, the electrocatalytic performance of the in situ composite is better than that of the ex situ composite. Thus, we can conclude that the homogeneous distribution of Ni2P nanoparticles obtained under the in situ route guarantees a more sensitive glucose detection compared with the ex situ material. The GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ electrode is sensitive and selective toward glucose detection without interference from classical normal molecules present in physiological fluids. Regarding the applicability of the sensor in a real sample, our work demonstrates for the first time the detection of glucose in an artificial saliva matrix using a non-enzymatic sensor based on Ni2P. This has not been demonstrated for another metal phosphide-based sensor to date. Finally, it is clear that even when Ni compounds have been used for glucose sensors and that there are three works that use Ni phosphides, our sensor represents a novel and competitive alternative for the development of non-enzymatic glucose sensors.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/bios13010049/s1, Figure S1: Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) of the (a) in situ FC/Ni2P composite and (c) Ni2P. (b) Gaussian particle size distribution of the in situ FC/Ni2P composite and (d) Ni2P from STEM images. Figure S2: SEM images of fibers obtained by electrospinning (a) without heat treatment, (b) dried at 110 °C, (c) stabilized at 250 °C, and (d) carbonized at 700 °C, with their average diameters. Figure S3: SEM images of fibers obtained by electrospinning (a) without heat treatment, (b) dried at 110 °C, (c) stabilized at 250 °C, and (d) carbonized/reduction at 700 °C, with their average diameters. Figure S4: EDX spectrum per point of Figure 2, corresponding to FC/Ni2P in situ composite. Table S1: Summary EDX analysis by point of the in situ FC/Ni2P composite of Figure 2. Figure S5: Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of in situ FC/ Ni2P composite. Figure S6: Cyclic voltammetry of GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ modified electrodes in the presence (red lines) and absence of glucose (black lines) in different concentration of NaOH solution (a) pH = 10 (b) pH = 11 and (c) pH = 12. Conditions: additions of 1.00 mM glucose, scan rate= 50.0 mVs-1. Figure S7: (a) Cyclic voltammetry of the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ electrode in the presence of 1mM glucose at different scan rates (mVs−1). (b) the corresponding plots of current density vs. the square root of scan rate. Figure S8: Amperometric response of glucose in artificial saliva for standard addition method (a) 18 µM and (b) correspond to the calibration curves, corresponding to three measurements.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.R.-L. and S.B.; methodology, D.R.-L., S.B., T.P.B., A.N.-C. and N.B.-M.; formal analysis, T.P.B. and N.B.-M.; investigation, T.P.B.; resources, D.R.-L. and S.B.; data curation, D.R.-L. and S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, T.P.B.; writing—review and editing, D.R.-L. and S.B.; supervision, D.R.-L., S.B. and A.N.-C.; project administration, D.R.-L. and S.B.; funding acquisition, D.R.-L. and S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by ANID-Fondecyt-Chile Grants (1200828, 1211518 and 1211345) and ANID National Doctoral Scholarship Chile (21200699).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ogurtsova, K.; Da Rocha Fernandes, J.D.; Huang, Y.; Linnenkamp, U.; Guariguata, L.; Cho, N.H.; Cavan, D.; Shaw, J.E.; Makaroff, L.E. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2017, 128, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Tian, K.; Prestgard, M.; Tiwari, A. A review of recent advances in nonenzymatic glucose sensors. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 41, 100–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nor, N.M.; Ridhuan, N.S.; Razak, K.A. Progress of Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Electrochemical Glucose Biosensor Based on Nanomaterial-Modified Electrode. Biosensors 2022, 12, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hwang, D.-W.; Lee, S.; Seo, M.; Chung, T.D. Recent advances in electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose sensors—A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1033, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, J.; Lin, Q.; Yin, W.; Jiang, T.; Zhao, D.; Jiang, L. A novel nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on functionalized PDDA-graphene/CuO nanocomposites. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 253, 1087–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, J.; Zheng, C.; Gao, J.; Gui, J.; Deng, L.; Wang, Y.; Xu, R. Co3O4 nanoparticles embedded in laser-induced graphene for a flexible and highly sensitive enzyme-free glucose biosensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 347, 130653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rani, S.D.; Ramachandran, R.; Sheet, S.; Aziz, A.; Lee, Y.S.; Al-Sehemi, A.G.; Pannipara, M.; Xia, Y.; Tsai, S.-Y.; Ng, F.-L.; et al. NiMoO4 nanoparticles decorated carbon nanofiber membranes for the flexible and high performance glucose sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 312, 127886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qian, Q.; Hu, Q.; Li, L.; Shi, P.; Zhou, J.; Kong, J.; Zhang, X.; Sun, G.; Huang, W. Sensitive fiber microelectrode made of nickel hydroxide nanosheets embedded in highly-aligned carbon nanotube scaffold for nonenzymatic glucose determination. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 257, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shi, Y.; Zhang, B. Recent advances in transition metal phosphide nanomaterials: Synthesis and applications in hydrogen evolution reaction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 1529–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tong, S.; Li, Z.; Qiu, B.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Z. Biphasic nickel phosphide nanosheets: Self-supported electrocatalyst for sensitive and selective electrochemical H2O2 detection and its practical applications in blood and living cells. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 258, 789–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lei, H.; Chen, M.; Liang, Z.; Liu, C.; Zhang, W.; Cao, R. Ni2P hollow microspheres for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution and reduction reactions. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8, 2289–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhu, J.; Yin, H.; Gong, J.; Al-Furjan, M.; Nie, Q. In situ growth of Ni/NiO on N-doped carbon spheres with excellent electrocatalytic performance for non-enzymatic glucose detection. J. Alloy. Compd. 2018, 748, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chakraborty, P.; Deka, N.; Patra, D.C.; Debnath, K.; Mondal, S.P. Salivary glucose sensing using highly sensitive and selective non-enzymatic porous NiO nanostructured electrodes. Surf. Interfaces 2021, 26, 101324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Zheng, D.; Liu, S.; Qin, S.; Sun, X.; Wang, Z.; Qin, C.; Li, Y.; Zhou, J. Flexible porous Ni(OH)2 nanopetals sandwiches for wearable non-enzyme glucose sensors. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 552, 149529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, Y.; Yang, L.; Tang, X.; Zhang, Y.; He, Z.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, X.; Xiong, X. Microplasma synthesis of Ni(OH)2 nanoflake array on carbon cloth as an efficient nonenzymatic sensor for glucose. Ionics 2021, 27, 2739–2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kanda, Y.; Kawanishi, K.; Tsujino, T.; Al-Otaibi, A.M.; Uemichi, Y. Catalytic Activities of Noble Metal Phosphides for Hydrogenation and Hydrodesulfurization Reactions. Catalysts 2018, 8, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Oyama, S.T.; Gott, T.; Zhao, H.; Lee, Y.-K. Transition metal phosphide hydroprocessing catalysts: A review. Catal. Today 2009, 143, 94–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, M.-Q.; Ye, C.; Liu, H.; Xu, M.; Bao, S.-J. Nanosized Metal Phosphides Embedded in Nitrogen-Doped Porous Carbon Nanofibers for Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution at All pH Values. Angew. Chem. 2017, 130, 1981–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Streckova, M.; Mudra, E.; Orinakova, R.; Markusova-Buckova, L.; Sebek, M.; Kovalcikova, A.; Sopcak, T.; Girman, V.; Dankova, Z.; Micusik, M.; et al. Nickel and nickel phosphide nanoparticles embedded in electrospun carbon fibers as favourable electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 303, 167–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, R.; Zhu, K.; Huang, J.; Yang, L.; Li, S.; Wang, Z.; Xie, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, J. Ultrafine Ni2P nanoparticles embedded in one-dimensional carbon skeleton derived from metal-organic frameworks template as a high-performance anode for lithium ion battery. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 775, 490–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, T.; Liu, D.; Lu, W.; Wang, K.; Du, G.; Asiri, A.M.; Sun, X. Three-Dimensional Ni2P Nanoarray: An Efficient Catalyst Electrode for Sensitive and Selective Nonenzymatic Glucose Sensing with High Specificity. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 7885–7889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.; Xia, J.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Z. MOF-Derived Porous Ni2P/Graphene Composites with Enhanced Electrochemical Properties for Sensitive Nonenzymatic Glucose Sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 39151–39160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, C.; Han, B.; Li, J.; Gao, Q.; Xia, K.; Zhou, C. Direct epitaxial growth of nickel phosphide nanosheets on nickel foam as self-support electrode for efficient non-enzymatic glucose sensing. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 435501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Guan, Q.; Han, F.; Li, W. Catalytic performance and deoxygenation path of methyl palmitate on Ni2P/SiO2 synthesized using the thermal decomposition of nickel hypophosphite. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 31308–31315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gal, J.Y. About a synthetic saliva for in vitro studies. Talanta 2001, 53, 1103–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.-Q.; Bai, Y.; Chu, W.; Sh, J. Confinement preparation of hierarchical NiO-N-doped carbon@reduced graphene oxide microspheres for high-performance non-enzymatic detection of glucose. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ni, Y.; Xu, J.; Liang, Q.; Shao, S. Enzyme-free glucose sensor based on heteroatom-enriched activated carbon (HAC) decorated with hedgehog-like NiO nanostructures. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 250, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, D.; Baydoun, H.; Verani, C.N.; Brock, S.L. Efficient Water Oxidation Using CoMnP Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 4006–4009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bruen, D.; Delaney, C.; Florea, L.; Diamond, D. Glucose Sensing for Diabetes Monitoring: Recent Developments. Sensors 2017, 17, 1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Jurysta, C.; Bulur, N.; Oguzhan, B.; Satman, I.; Yilmaz, T.M.; Malaisse, W.J.; Sener, A. Salivary Glucose Concentration and Excretion in Normal and Diabetic Subjects. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2009, 2009, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jiang, L.; Xue, Q.; Jiao, C.; Liu, H.; Zhou, Y.; Ma, H.; Yang, Q. A non-enzymatic nanoceria electrode for non-invasive glucose monitoring. Anal. Methods 2018, 10, 2151–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guo, S.; Zhang, C.; Yang, M.; Zhou, Y.; Bi, C.; Lv, Q.; Ma, N. A facile and sensitive electrochemical sensor for non-enzymatic glucose detection based on three-dimensional flexible polyurethane sponge decorated with nickel hydroxide. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1109, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, Y.; Xu, F.; Sun, Y.; Shi, Y.; Wen, Z.; Li, Z. Assembly of Ni(OH)2 nanoplates on reduced graphene oxide: A two dimensional nanocomposite for enzyme-free glucose sensing. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 16949–16954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, W.-D.; Chen, J.; Jiang, L.-C.; Yu, Y.-X.; Zhang, J.-Q. A highly sensitive nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on NiO-modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Microchim. Acta 2010, 168, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Prasad, R.; Gorjizadeh, N.; Rajarao, R.; Sahajwalla, V.; Bhat, B.R. Plant root nodule like nickel-oxide–multi-walled carbon nanotube composites for non-enzymatic glucose sensors. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 44792–44799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xiao, X.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, H.; Cui, Y.; Xu, Y.; Yang, T.; Zhang, D.; Xu, X. Porous flower-like Ni5P4 for non-enzymatic electrochemical detection of glucose. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 240, 122202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Das, D.; Das, A.; Reghunath, M.; Nanda, K.K. Phosphine-free avenue to Co2P nanoparticle encapsulated N,P co-doped CNTs: A novel non-enzymatic glucose sensor and an efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 1327–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. He, L.; Li, J.; Cao, J.; Li, X.; Feng, X.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y. High performance of non-enzymatic glucose biosensors based on the design of microstructure of Ni2P/Cu3P nanocomposites. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, Y.; Teng, H.; Hou, H.; You, T. Nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on renewable electrospun Ni nanoparticle-loaded carbon nanofiber paste electrode. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009, 24, 3329–3334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Adabi, M.; Adabi, M. Electrodeposition of nickel on electrospun carbon nanofiber mat electrode for electrochemical sensing of glucose. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2019, 42, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dong, S.; Niu, H.; Sun, L.; Zhang, S.; Wu, D.; Yang, Z.; Xiang, M. Highly dense Ni-MOF nanoflake arrays supported on conductive graphene/carbon fiber substrate as flexible microelectrode for electrochemical sensing of glucose. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2022, 911, 116219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mei, Q.; Fu, R.; Ding, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, A.; Duan, D.; Ye, D. Electrospinning of highly dispersed Ni/CoO carbon nanofiber and its application in glucose electrochemical sensor. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 847, 113075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, L.; Wang, Z.; Yang, J.; Liu, G.; Li, J.; Guo, L.; Chen, S.; Guo, Q. NiCo2O4 nanoneedle-decorated electrospun carbon nanofiber nanohybrids for sensitive non-enzymatic glucose sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 258, 920–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mohammadpour-Haratbar, A.; Mazinani, S.; Sharif, F.; Bazargan, A.M. Improving Nonenzymatic Biosensing Performance of Electrospun Carbon Nanofibers decorated with Ni/Co Particles via Oxidation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2022, 194, 2542–2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, L.; Yuan, S.-M.; Lu, X.-J. Amperometric nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on a glassy carbon electrode modified with a nanocomposite made from nickel(II) hydroxide nanoplates and carbon nanofibers. Microchim. Acta 2013, 181, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Saravanan, J.; Pannipara, M.; Al-Sehemi, A.G.; Talebi, S.; Periasamy, V.; Shah, S.S.; Aziz, A.; Kumar, G.G. Flower-like CuO/NiO nanostructures decorated activated carbon nanofiber membranes for flexible, sensitive, and selective enzyme-free glucose detection. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 24775–24789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Qin, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yu, C.; Cui, J.; Yu, D.; Wu, Y. Construction of high sensitivity non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on three-dimensiona nickel foam supported Ni2P/NiO/CeO2 nanoflake arrays. IOP Conf. Series Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 733, 012019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biosensors 13 00049 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Preparation method for carbon fiber composite and modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE).
Scheme 1. Preparation method for carbon fiber composite and modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE).
Biosensors 13 00049 sch001
Biosensors 13 00049 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) X-ray diffraction of carbon fiber (FC), Ni2P and in situ FC/Ni2P composite. SEM images of (b) carbon fiber (FC) and (c) in situ FC/Ni2P composite. (d) Backscattering electron micrographs (BSE) of the in situ FC/Ni2P composite. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) of (e) nickel, (f) phosphorus and (g) carbon phosphorus.
Figure 1. (a) X-ray diffraction of carbon fiber (FC), Ni2P and in situ FC/Ni2P composite. SEM images of (b) carbon fiber (FC) and (c) in situ FC/Ni2P composite. (d) Backscattering electron micrographs (BSE) of the in situ FC/Ni2P composite. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) of (e) nickel, (f) phosphorus and (g) carbon phosphorus.
Biosensors 13 00049 g001
Biosensors 13 00049 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) SEM image of in situ FC/Ni2P composite, and (b) BSE image of in situ FC/Ni2P composite. An EDX analysis was performed per point from the points indicated in BSE image.
Figure 2. (a) SEM image of in situ FC/Ni2P composite, and (b) BSE image of in situ FC/Ni2P composite. An EDX analysis was performed per point from the points indicated in BSE image.
Biosensors 13 00049 g002
Biosensors 13 00049 g003 550
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammetry of (a) GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ, (b) GCE/FC/Ni2P ex situ, (c) GCE/Ni2P, and (d) GCE/FC modified electrodes in the presence and absence of glucose. Conditions: additions of 1.00 mM glucose, potential range from 0.200 to 0.700 V, scan rate = 50.0 mVs−1, 0.100 M NaOH.
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammetry of (a) GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ, (b) GCE/FC/Ni2P ex situ, (c) GCE/Ni2P, and (d) GCE/FC modified electrodes in the presence and absence of glucose. Conditions: additions of 1.00 mM glucose, potential range from 0.200 to 0.700 V, scan rate = 50.0 mVs−1, 0.100 M NaOH.
Biosensors 13 00049 g003
Biosensors 13 00049 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Hydrodynamic voltammetry in 0.100 M NaOH solution and (b) effect of pH at 0.500 V for the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ electrode in the presence of 300 µM glucose, corresponding to three measurements.
Figure 4. (a) Hydrodynamic voltammetry in 0.100 M NaOH solution and (b) effect of pH at 0.500 V for the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ electrode in the presence of 300 µM glucose, corresponding to three measurements.
Biosensors 13 00049 g004
Biosensors 13 00049 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Amperometric response of modified electrodes to successive addition of glucose in 0.100 M NaOH solution with a potential of 0.500 V vs. Ag/AgCl electrode and (b) current response as a function of glucose concentration, corresponding to three measurements. (c) Amperometric response of the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ sensor to successive addition of glucose in 0.100 M NaOH solution with a potential of 0.500 V vs. Ag/AgCl electrode and (d) response in the current density as a function of glucose concentration, corresponding to three measurements.
Figure 5. (a) Amperometric response of modified electrodes to successive addition of glucose in 0.100 M NaOH solution with a potential of 0.500 V vs. Ag/AgCl electrode and (b) current response as a function of glucose concentration, corresponding to three measurements. (c) Amperometric response of the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ sensor to successive addition of glucose in 0.100 M NaOH solution with a potential of 0.500 V vs. Ag/AgCl electrode and (d) response in the current density as a function of glucose concentration, corresponding to three measurements.
Biosensors 13 00049 g005
Biosensors 13 00049 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Current response using the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ sensor in the detection of 20.00 µM glucose in 0.100 M NaOH in consecutive measurements every 5 days for 30 days (corresponding to three measurements). (b) Amperometric responses of the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ sensor to the successive addition of 100 µM glucose and 10 µM interferents.
Figure 6. (a) Current response using the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ sensor in the detection of 20.00 µM glucose in 0.100 M NaOH in consecutive measurements every 5 days for 30 days (corresponding to three measurements). (b) Amperometric responses of the GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ sensor to the successive addition of 100 µM glucose and 10 µM interferents.
Biosensors 13 00049 g006
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the analytical parameters of different modified electrodes.
Table 1. Comparison of the analytical parameters of different modified electrodes.
SensorSensitivity
µAmM−1cm−2		LOD
µM		LOQ
µM		Concentration Range/µM
GCE/FC/Ni2P in situ10050.240.7319.8–185
GCE/FC/Ni2P ex situ8181.24 µM3.7519.8–185
GCE/Ni2P4241.34 µM4.0719.8–185
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Brito, T.P.; Butto-Miranda, N.; Neira-Carrillo, A.; Bollo, S.; Ruíz-León, D. Synergistic Effect of Composite Nickel Phosphide Nanoparticles and Carbon Fiber on the Enhancement of Salivary Enzyme-Free Glucose Sensing. Biosensors 2023, 13, 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13010049

AMA Style

Brito TP, Butto-Miranda N, Neira-Carrillo A, Bollo S, Ruíz-León D. Synergistic Effect of Composite Nickel Phosphide Nanoparticles and Carbon Fiber on the Enhancement of Salivary Enzyme-Free Glucose Sensing. Biosensors. 2023; 13(1):49. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13010049

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brito, Tania P., Nicole Butto-Miranda, Andrónico Neira-Carrillo, Soledad Bollo, and Domingo Ruíz-León. 2023. "Synergistic Effect of Composite Nickel Phosphide Nanoparticles and Carbon Fiber on the Enhancement of Salivary Enzyme-Free Glucose Sensing" Biosensors 13, no. 1: 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13010049

APA Style

Brito, T. P., Butto-Miranda, N., Neira-Carrillo, A., Bollo, S., & Ruíz-León, D. (2023). Synergistic Effect of Composite Nickel Phosphide Nanoparticles and Carbon Fiber on the Enhancement of Salivary Enzyme-Free Glucose Sensing. Biosensors, 13(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13010049

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop