Next Article in Journal
Bioadhesive Gauze Embedded with Chitosan-Butein Bioconjugate: A Redox-Active pH Sensor Platform
Next Article in Special Issue
Paper-Based Colorimetric Detection of miRNA-21 Using Pre-Activated Nylon Membrane and Peroxidase-Mimetic Activity of Cysteamine-Capped Gold Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
A New Hematocrit Measurement Method Using a Chemiluminescence Biosensor and Its Application in a Chemiluminescence Immunoassay Platform for Myocardial Markers Detection with Whole Blood Samples
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Biosensing Methods Based on Different Isothermal Amplification Strategies: A Case Study with Erwinia amylovora
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Microfluidic Biosensors for Point-of-Care Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests

by
Kieu The Loan Trinh
Department of Industrial Environmental Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea
Biosensors 2023, 13(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13010005
Submission received: 15 December 2022 / Accepted: 18 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
This Special Issue of Biosensors, “Microfluidic Biosensors for Point-of-Care Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests” aims to gather original research papers and comprehensive reviews detailing novel research, fabrication methods, and applications, as well as the challenges and prospects of developing microfluidics for improved biosensing and diagnostics. We hope to attract the attention of researchers from various disciplines of biology, chemistry, medicine, and materials sciences, to accelerate progress in the field and encourage creative minds to develop novel research.
Nucleic acid amplification tests are effective tools for rapid and accurate diagnosis in healthcare, food safety, and environmental monitoring [1,2,3]. These methods identify specific DNA or RNA sequences of the target for detection with high specificity and sensitivity. This method provides rapid results. Due to their advantages, nucleic acid amplification tests have become commonplace in many settings. Nucleic acid amplification tests can be classified as conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and isothermal nucleic acid amplification. PCR is amplification reaction based on the activity of DNA polymerase and reverse and forward primers, which is driven by thermal cycles. The thermal cycles assist the denaturation of the double strand, annealing of the primers, and the extension and production of a new strand. Isothermal nucleic acid amplification methods are alternative forms of PCR. The method requires only one constant temperature for nucleic acid amplification, eliminating the need for thermal cycles [4]. These methods consume less time than PCR without the need for bulky equipment such as thermocyclers. There are many kinds of isothermal amplification techniques, including loop-mediated isothermal amplification, recombinase polymerase amplification, and helicase-dependent amplification.
A microfluidic chip is a small reactor that can perform an analytical assay by confining and controlling the fluid inside the chip channel. Microfluidics offer many advantages: the ability to use small amounts of sample and reagents; low cost; and short analysis time [5,6,7]. The technology is ideal for simplifying complicated analysis process in one tiny device. Microfluidics have been intensively developed for diagnostic purposes, offering a rapid, accurate, sensitive, cheap, and automated platform for nucleic acid amplification tests.
Point-of-care testing (POCT) is laboratory analysis conducted near the site of the patient [8,9]. POCT can improve patient care by providing a rapid testing process without the need for bulky equipment [10,11]. POCT offers rapid tests within minutes and utilizes cheap and user-friendly devices [12,13,14]. The combination of microfluidics and POCT can increase the efficiency of detection and user accessibility, simplify the analysis process, shorten assay time, and improve accuracy and sensitivity [15,16,17].
This Special Issue aims to introduce the research progress of microfluidic biosensors for point-of-care nucleic acid amplification tests. Sun et al. proposed a sensitive electrochemical biosensor for rapid screening of the tumor biomarker TP53 gene mutation hotspot [18]. The device detects a target using self-assembly sulfhydryl ended hairpin DNA probes tagged with methylene blue onto a gold electrode. Upon recognizing target DNA, the probes changed their structure and produced electrochemical signal differences via differential pulse voltammetry. The sensor achieved a limit of detection as low as 10 nmol/L, with good specific recognition ability for single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP).
An all-dielectric metasurface biosensor for rapid detection of attomolar SAR-CoV-2 nucleic acids was proposed by Iwanaga [19]. In the study, nucleic acid amplification was combined with a metasurface biosensor which produced high fluorescence efficiency. The biosensor is composed of a microfluidic transparent chip and a pair of all-dielectric metasurfaces. The device can rapidly and sensitively detect SAR-CoV-2 in 1 h with the limit of detection of 100 RNA copies/140 µL.
This Special Issue contains meaningful contributions from researchers using cutting-edge biosensing technologies for POCT applications to achieve rapid nucleic acid analysis, including electrochemical biosensing and all-dielectric metasurface biosensing. Together with microfluidic techniques, we expect these proposed schemes to advance patient wellness by ensuring faster diagnosis and better prognosis and bridging the gap between healthcare providers and patients.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful for the opportunity to serve as one of the Guest Editors of the Special Issue “Microfluidic biosensors for point-of-care nucleic acid amplification tests”, as well as the contribution of all the authors to this Special Issue. The dedicated work of the Special Issue Editor of Biosensors and the editorial and publishing staff of Biosensors is greatly appreciated. I would like to acknowledge all the authors for their valuable contributions. Lastly, I am grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable input, comments, and suggestions for the submitted papers.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wilson, D.S.; Szostak, J.W. In vitro selection of functional nucleic acids. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1999, 68, 611–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kang, T.; Lu, J.; Yu, T.; Long, Y.; Liu, G. Advances in nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAATs): COVID-19 point-of-care diagnostics as an example. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 206, 114109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liu, R.; Zhang, F.; Sang, Y.; Katouzian, I.; Jafari, S.M.; Wang, X.; Li, W.; Wang, J.; Mohammadi, Z. Screening, identification, and application of nucleic acid aptamers applied in food safety biosensing. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 123, 355–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhao, Y.; Chen, F.; Li, Q.; Wang, L.; Fan, C. Isothermal amplification of nucleic acid. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 12491–12545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Whitesides, G.M. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 2006, 442, 368–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hofer, U. POCT for drug-resistant gonorrhea. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 406. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, Y.; Li, B.; Tian, T.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Qian, K. Advanced on-site and in vitro signal amplification biosensors for biomolecule analysis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2022, 149, 116565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Song, Q.; Sun, X.; Dai, Z.; Gao, Y.; Gong, X.; Zhou, B.; Wu, J.; Wen, W. Point-of-care testing detection methods for COVID-19. Lab Chip 2021, 21, 1634–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kubina, R.; Dziedzic, A. Molecular and serological tests for COVID-19 a comparative review of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus laboratory and point-of-care diagnostics. Diagnostics 2020, 26, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Zamani, M.; Furst, A.L.; Klapperich, C.M. Strategies for engineering affordable technologies for point-of-care diagnostics of infectious diseases. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 54, 3772–3779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Fan, X.; Han, F.; Zhao, B.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Pu, X.; Du, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, W.; et al. Rapid, visual, and equipment-free point-of-care testing for Staphylococcus aureus by direct recombinase polymerase amplification with SYBR Green I. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2021, 53, 1250–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Shimazu, R.; Tominuro, K.; Ni, Y.; Malegori, C.; Hamedpour, V.; Hiruta, Y.; Oliveri, P.; Merkx, M.; Citterio, D. Microfluidic thread-based analytical devices for point-of-care detection of therapeutic antibody in blood. Sens. Actuators B Chem 2022, 352, 131002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Misawa, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Hiruta, Y.; Yamazaki, H.; Citterio, D. Text-displaying semiquantitative competitive lateral flow immunoassay replying on inkjet-printed patterns. ACS Sens. 2020, 5, 2076–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Macchia, E.; Kovacs-Vajna, Z.M.; Loconsole, D.; Sarcina, L.; Redolfi, M.; Chironna, M.; Torricelli, F. A handheld intelligent single-molecule binary bioelectronics system for fast and reliable immunometric point-of-care testing. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabo0881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sachdeva, S.; Davis, R.W.; Saha, A.K. Microfluidic point-of-care testing: Commercial landscape and future direction. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 8, 602659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bai, Y.; Ji, J.; Ji, F.; Wu, S.; Tian, Y.; Jin, B.; Li, Z. Recombinase polymerase amplification integrated with microfluidics for nucleic acid testing at point of care. Talanta 2022, 240, 123209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xing, G.; Ai, J.; Wang, N.; Pu, Q. Recent progress of smartphone-assisted microfluidic sensors for point of care testing. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2022, 157, 116792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, P.; Niu, K.; Du, H.; Li, R.; Chen, J.; Lu, X. Sensitive electrochemical biosensor for rapid screening of tumor biomarker TP53 gene mutation hotspot. Biosensors 2022, 12, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Iwanaga, M. Rapid detection of attomolar SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids in all-dielectric metasurface biosensors. Biosensors 2022, 12, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Trinh, K.T.L. Microfluidic Biosensors for Point-of-Care Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests. Biosensors 2023, 13, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13010005

AMA Style

Trinh KTL. Microfluidic Biosensors for Point-of-Care Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests. Biosensors. 2023; 13(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13010005

Chicago/Turabian Style

Trinh, Kieu The Loan. 2023. "Microfluidic Biosensors for Point-of-Care Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests" Biosensors 13, no. 1: 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13010005

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop