Next Article in Journal
Engineering of the CHAPk Staphylococcal Phage Endolysin to Enhance Antibacterial Activity against Stationary-Phase Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO 1 In Vitro Time–Kill Kinetics Using Single Phages and Phage Formulations—Modulating Death, Adaptation, and Resistance
Previous Article in Journal
Speciation and Antibiotic Susceptibilities of Coagulase Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Ocular Infections
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bacteriophages with Potential to Inactivate Aeromonas hydrophila in Cockles: In Vitro and In Vivo Preliminary Studies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Perspective

Basics for Improved Use of Phages for Therapy

1
Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, The University of Texas Health Center, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA
2
Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, The University of Texas Health Center, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2021, 10(6), 723; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060723
Submission received: 17 May 2021 / Revised: 7 June 2021 / Accepted: 10 June 2021 / Published: 16 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phage Therapy to Control Pathogenic Bacteria)

Abstract

Blood-borne therapeutic phages and phage capsids increasingly reach therapeutic targets as they acquire more persistence, i.e., become more resistant to non-targeted removal from blood. Pathogenic bacteria are targets during classical phage therapy. Metastatic tumors are potential future targets, during use of drug delivery vehicles (DDVs) that are phage derived. Phage therapy has, to date, only sometimes been successful. One cause of failure is low phage persistence. A three-step strategy for increasing persistence is to increase (1) the speed of lytic phage isolation, (2) the diversity of phages isolated, and (3) the effectiveness and speed of screening phages for high persistence. The importance of high persistence-screening is illustrated by our finding here of persistence dramatically higher for coliphage T3 than for its relative, coliphage T7, in murine blood. Coliphage T4 is more persistent, long-term than T3. Pseudomonas chlororaphis phage 201phi2-1 has relatively low persistence. These data are obtained with phages co-inoculated and separately assayed. In addition, highly persistent phage T3 undergoes dispersal to several murine organs and displays tumor tropism in epithelial tissue (xenografted human oral squamous cell carcinoma). Dispersal is an asset for phage therapy, but a liability for phage-based DDVs. We propose increased focus on phage persistence—and dispersal—screening.
Keywords: bacteriophage, double-stranded DNA; drug delivery vehicle; infectious disease; multidrug-resistant bacteria; murine model; native gel electrophoresis; phage therapy, bypassing limitations of bacteriophage, double-stranded DNA; drug delivery vehicle; infectious disease; multidrug-resistant bacteria; murine model; native gel electrophoresis; phage therapy, bypassing limitations of

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Serwer, P.; Wright, E.T.; De La Chapa, J.; Gonzales, C.B. Basics for Improved Use of Phages for Therapy. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060723

AMA Style

Serwer P, Wright ET, De La Chapa J, Gonzales CB. Basics for Improved Use of Phages for Therapy. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(6):723. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060723

Chicago/Turabian Style

Serwer, Philip, Elena T. Wright, Jorge De La Chapa, and Cara B. Gonzales. 2021. "Basics for Improved Use of Phages for Therapy" Antibiotics 10, no. 6: 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060723

APA Style

Serwer, P., Wright, E. T., De La Chapa, J., & Gonzales, C. B. (2021). Basics for Improved Use of Phages for Therapy. Antibiotics, 10(6), 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060723

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop