Next Article in Journal
Experimental Evolution of Copper Resistance in Escherichia coli Produces Evolutionary Trade-Offs in the Antibiotics Chloramphenicol, Bacitracin, and Sulfonamide
Next Article in Special Issue
Causative Pathogens Do Not Differ between Early, Delayed or Late Fracture-Related Infections
Previous Article in Journal
A Retrospective Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of Vancomycin versus Daptomycin in Hemodialysis Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Systemic Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Scoping Review and Critical Appraisal
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficacy of Infection Eradication in Antibiotic Cement-Coated Intramedullary Nails for Fracture-Related Infections, Nonunions, and Fusions

International Center for Limb Lengthening, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(6), 709; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11060709
Submission received: 25 March 2022 / Revised: 16 May 2022 / Accepted: 20 May 2022 / Published: 25 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fracture-Related Infection: An Update on Antimicrobial Therapy)

Abstract

:
Antibiotic cement-coated intramedullary nails (ACCINs) are increasing in popularity as a viable solution for the treatment of fracture-related infections (FRIs), infected long bone nonunions, and arthrodeses without an external fixator. ACCINs effectively manage to fulfill three of the basic principles for eradicating osteomyelitis: dead space management, antibiotic delivery, and bone stability. We performed a retrospective review of 111 patients who were treated with ACCINs between January 2014 and December 2020. In our series, 87.4% (n = 97) of patients achieved healed and uninfected bone or stable arthrodesis at a mean follow-up of 29.2 months (range, 6–93 months). Additionally, 69.1% (n = 67) of healed patients were resolved after only one procedure, and the remainder (30.9%, n = 30) healed after one or more additional procedures. The mean number of additional procedures was 2.1 (range, 1–6 additional procedures). The overall limb salvage rate was 93.7% (n = 104). The majority of the total cohort were successfully treated in only one surgery. This study suggests that ACCINs are effective in the treatment of FRIs, infected long bone nonunions, and infected ankle and knee arthrodeses.

1. Introduction

Orthopedic infections complicated by large soft tissue defects, exposed hardware, and lack of bone stability have traditionally been treated with external fixation since inserting internal fixation into an infected bone and soft tissue envelope has been contraindicated. Bone stability is essential for eradicating infection. The concept of the insertion of antibiotic-coated intramedullary nails has revolutionized the care of these difficult cases since it can provide antibiotic delivery and bone stability and be inserted at the time of radical infection debridement.
Antibiotic cement-coated intramedullary nails (ACCINs) allow for early weight bearing, prompt joint range of motion, and the possibility of treatment in a single operation. First described in 2007, ACCINs offer the advantages of providing both antibiotic delivery and bone stability [1]. The literature shows multiple studies involving ACCINs that have demonstrated their successful implementation to treat infected nonunions and arthrodeses [2,3,4,5,6]. The 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection agreed that antibiotic-coated intramedullary nails were an effective treatment for these difficult cases [7]. Additionally, an international expert group on fracture-related infection (FRI) published evidence-based recommendations for local antibiotic delivery and dead space management, and declared that the use of intramedullary antibiotic-laden polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-coated nails remains a good treatment option for long bone FRIs [8].
In this present study, 111 patients who underwent procedure with ACCINs from January 2014 to December 2020 at a single center by a single surgeon were retrospectively investigated. This is the largest known series of patients undergoing this ACCIN technique, and the most recent group investigated by the senior author. These findings continue to demonstrate the ACCINs efficacy with respect to infection control, now demonstrated for an increased number of indications.

2. Results

In our series, 87.4% (n = 97) of patients achieved either healed and uninfected bone or stable arthrodesis, as applicable, at a mean follow-up of 29.2 months (range, 6–93 months). This was confirmed clinically, radiographically, and serologically. Of this subset of 97 patients, 69.1% (n = 67) healed after only one procedure and 30.9% (n = 30) after one or more additional procedures. The mean number of additional procedures was 2.1 (range, 1–6 procedures). Secondary procedures were performed at a mean time interval of 10.5 months (range, 1–45 months). Of the remaining 14 patients, seven ended with amputation and seven were still undergoing treatment: three for infected nonunion and four for nonunion only after infection resolution.
Thirty patients who were successfully treated underwent additional procedures. Fourteen of them had the same culture results postoperatively and the remaining 16 had different results postoperatively. Twenty patients had positive culture results and the remaining 10 had negative culture results. Regarding antibiotics susceptibility for the 20 patients with positive culture results, 18 patients were sensitive to several antibiotics including vancomycin or tobramycin. One patient (with multiple organisms) was only sensitive to meropenem and was resistant to both tobramycin and vancomycin. That patient received meropenem postoperative for six weeks. His infection was resolved by completion of his follow-up. The remaining patient in this subset of 20 patients with positive culture results did not have an antibiotic susceptibility report available in their records. Of the 30 patients who required additional procedures, 24 patients (80%) required an additional procedure due only to infection, and the mean number of procedures was two (range, 1–5 procedures). The most common procedures for infection were irrigation and debridement, bone resection, exchange rodding, and rod removal with antibiotic calcium sulfate injection.
The mean time from the initial ACCIN to the additional procedure was 7.6 months (range, 1–29 months). Four patients (13.3%) required additional procedures due only to nonunion, and the mean number of procedures was 1.3 (range, 1–2 procedures). In all nonunion cases, the procedure was exchange rodding with bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 and/or reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) autograft bone. The mean time from the initial ACCIN to the additional procedure was 18.3 months (range, 3–45 months). The last two patients (6.7%) needed additional procedures for both infection and nonunion. Both patients required only one additional procedure: a bone resection with exchange rodding and insertion of BMP-2. The mean time from the initial ACCIN to the additional procedure was 2.5 months (range, 1–4 months).
Thirty-five patients had segmental bone defects; mean defect size was 6.1 cm (range, 0.5–24 cm). The success rate within this subgroup was 85.7% (n = 30). The success rate for patients without defects was 88.2% (n = 67). There was no significant difference between the number of additional procedures needed for success in both groups.
Only seven patients required an amputation; the overall limb salvage rate was 93.7%. The mean age for patients who underwent amputation was 53.7 years (range, 44–61 years). Five patients underwent above-knee amputation and the remaining two had below-knee amputation. The mean number of additional procedures that were performed after the initial ACCIN and before amputation was 1.1 (range, 0–3 procedures). The mean time from first ACCIN until amputation was 30.5 months (range, 15–50 months). Four amputation patients had negative cultures and three were positive for Staphylococcus aureus. Five amputations were performed due to persistent infection and two were due to nonunion.
Regarding complications, 22 patients presented with 25 complications directly related to the initial insertion of the ACCIN. Symptomatic hardware was the most common (40%, n = 10), followed by superficial infection (24%, n = 6), nerve compression (20%, n = 5), joint contracture (8%, n = 2), and finally, hematoma and broken hardware, each occurring once (4% each) (Table 1). The lone broken nail was the result of a knee fusion ACCIN for treatment of an infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a residual bone defect of 9 cm. This case was revised with another knee fusion nail and bone transport over the nail using a monolateral fixator, resulting in successful noninfected fusion. Superficial infections were handled with local wound care and without a return to the operation room. Superficial infection happened in the first 2 weeks after surgery. All patients were already on postoperative antibiotic treatment for a total of 6 weeks.
Fifty patients (45%) of the series underwent rod removal for various reasons, with a total of 66 rods removed. The reasons for ACCIN removal were recurrence of infection (43.9%, n = 29); as a second stage of TKA revision (24.2%, n = 16); symptomatic hardware (15.2%, n = 10); as a part of an amputation procedure (10.6%, n = 7); and the remaining removals were due to nonunion, planning, and a broken rod (Table 2). Debonding occurred during ACCIN removal in only four cases.
A case example of a 74-year-old male patient who underwent ankle fusion using an ACCIN after an open ankle fracture is available, with several radiographs and photos, in the Supplementary Materials (Figures S1–S7).

3. Discussion

ACCINs continue to gain attention as a viable solution for the treatment of FRIs, infected long bone nonunions, and arthrodeses without an external fixator [9]. The basic principles for eradicating osteomyelitis include bone debridement, dead space management, antibiotic delivery, and bone stability. ACCINs can effectively manage to fulfill the latter three principles listed above. An additional advantage to this technique is that immediate weight bearing is possible.
Since 2007, many authors have published moderately sized series describing success using this technique [5,6]. Karek et al. [10] compared PMMA antibiotic elution using chest tube-coated guidewires and intramedullary nails. They found that the coating on the intramedullary nails had greater elution despite the thinner cement mantle. At least 50% of the antibiotics eluded in the first 24 h and the remaining antibiotic elution was at a sufficient level to inhibit S. aureus for 6 weeks [10]. Lopas et al. [11] described 41 cases of septic long bone nonunion and compared 33 flexible nonlocked rods to eight ACCINs. They reported that patients treated with ACCINs achieved earlier weight bearing, required autograft less frequently, and underwent fewer subsequent procedures when compared to the patients with flexible nails. In their retrospective study, Makhdom and his colleagues concluded that ACCINs represent an effective treatment option for septic complex lower extremity reconstruction and are associated with a limb salvage rate of 89%. They also recommended that patients with knee fusion after failed TKA should be counseled because of a high potential complication rate [3].
There are variations in the technique of treating infection with ACCINs, which is due to the various ways that an intramedullary nail can be coated. One article describes hand-rolling the nails [12], whereas other publications use chest tubes or vascular perfusion tubing [2,5]. In the report by Rice et al. [5] on single-stage treatment of FRIs, ACCINs were created using vascular perfusion tubing and resulted in 69% (22/32) of patients with union and were free from infection after one procedure with the ACCIN. Those patients who required additional surgery for infection or nonunion averaged 1.9 additional procedures per patient [5].
All cases in the present study used the silicone tubing technique, as previously published in a review that included patients treated with that technique as well as the mold technique [13]. In that report, 57% (38/67) of infected arthrodesis cases were healed and noninfected, and 60% (26/43) of infected long bone nonunion cases were treated successfully with one surgery with ACCIN. The present series used only the silicone tubing technique. This choice has greatly facilitated the ease with which the rod is created and has essentially eliminated the problem of debonding upon insertion or removal. The rate of ACCIN use at the authors’ institution has substantially increased, as have the number of cases seen at our referral center.
Segmental bone defects can pose a considerable challenge. In our previous series [13], the segmental bone defect group required more surgeries than those without segmental defects. In the present series, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of additional surgeries between segmental and non-segmental groups. Although the size of the defect significantly negatively impacted the success rate of the ACCIN and the number of additional procedures required to achieve a successful result in our 2014 study, it was not the case in the present series. The reason for this is unclear, considering the mean segmental defect size was 6 cm. Other literature similarly indicates that larger segmental defects are more difficult. In a study of 25 patients, Shyam et al. [12] reported that all patients with >6 cm segmental defects failed to heal and eradicate infection. The success rate in our segmental defects patients was 85.7% with three patients undergoing amputation.
Hardware removal after ACCIN insertion can be done for variable reasons and has been discussed in literature [14]. The most common reason for removal of rods in our series was recurrent infection (Table 2). Reasons for removal, pearls, and complications were previously detailed in our 2021 work [14].
This study has limitations, including its retrospective nature by a single surgeon. Additional limitations are the absence of a comparative group, the variety of indications, and the presence of segmental bone defects in a subgroup of the series. Additionally, the variation of the age group (range, 13–83 years) may have influenced the outcome. However, the authors posit that the variety of indications and the inclusion of segmental bone defects promotes the effectiveness of ACCINs in the treatment of bone infection, even in complex cases.
This study demonstrates the effectiveness of the ACCIN technique in the setting of infected nonunions and arthrodeses. The silicone tubing method is effective for creating a uniform cement mantle that can withstand insertion and removal. Several studies on commercially available European ACCINs have shown promise in treating open fractures and tibial nonunions [15,16,17,18] and expanding their use in the U.S. will make it more feasible for larger multicenter trials that use this technique.

4. Materials and Methods

After obtaining Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, a retrospective nonrandomized chart review was performed on a series of patients from January 2014 to December 2020 who were identified from a single surgeon database at a single institution. The investigation was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Within the specified timeframe, all ACCINs inserted by a single surgeon for the treatment of infected nonunions and arthrodeses were evaluated. The review revealed 120 patients who received ACCINs within that time. Patients with a follow-up of <6 months and patients who were classified as type C hosts according to the Cierny–Mader classification were excluded [19]. The present study is comprised of the 111 patients who remained after exclusions.
Demographics of our cohort are detailed in Table 3 and were as follows: there were 57 (51.4%) males and 54 (48.6%) females with a mean age of 56.9 years (range, 13–83 years). The mean body mass index (BMI) was documented for all patients on the day of procedure and was 33.4 kg/m2 (range, 17.5–52.4 kg/m2). Five patients (4.5%) were type A hosts and 106 patients (95.5%) were type B hosts. Diabetes and smoking were the most common comorbidities. Regarding race, 66.7% (n = 74) were white; 28.8% (n = 32) African American; 1.8% (n = 2) others, which included Asians and Native Hawaiian; and 2.7% (n = 3) declined to answer. Indications for the use of an ACCIN were as follows: infected TKAs (38.7%, n = 43), infected fusions (20.7%, n = 23), FRIs (20.7%, n = 23), and infected nonunions (19.8%, n = 22). Nails used were knee arthrodesis (46%, n = 51), ankle arthrodesis (32.4%, n = 36), tibial (11.7%, n = 13), retrograde femoral (5.4%, n = 6), and antegrade femoral (4.5%, n = 5).
Segmental bone defects were measured intraoperatively after debridement and were defined as the smallest-sized bone defect that would not heal without intervention [20]. Patients who had segmental bone defects represent 31.5% (n = 35) of the total cohort, with a mean defect size of 6.1 cm (range, 0.5–24 cm). This subgroup was divided into patients with infected total joints comprised 19.8% (n = 22) with a mean defect size of 6.7 cm (range, 1–24 cm) and patients with other causes who comprised 11.9% (n = 13) with a mean defect size of 5.2 cm (range, 0.5–12 cm) (Table 3). Specifically, the other causes consisted of 5 infected nonunions, 6 infected fusions, and 2 FRIs.
Full culture results are listed in Table 4. The most common organisms were methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) in 17.1% (n = 19) of patients and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) totaling 12.6% (n = 14). Negative wound cultures were reported in 42.3% (n = 47) of patients and 12.6% (n = 14) had multiple organisms. Cultures were obtained for the four patients with nonunion only; their results were negative. The same criteria were followed for these 4 to confirm there was no infection and the revision was only for nonunion. Negative culture results can be associated with osteomyelitis; thus, diagnosis involves clinical, laboratory, and radiological investigations. Some studies have suggested that the rate of negative cultures obtained during surgery in histologically proven osteomyelitis exceeds 40% [21]. Antibiotics were not routinely discontinued prior to surgery and could account for our culture rate. However, up to a 30% negative culture rate has been reported in the literature [22].
Although FRI is a challenging musculoskeletal complication in trauma surgery, it long lacked a clear definition. In their efforts to provide a clear definition for FRI, Metsemakers et al. suggested that although acute vs. chronic infections mandate different treatment strategies, this should not impact how clinicians define FRI [8]. In our series, the senior author classified FRIs as acute fractures <6 months and infected nonunions as those presenting >6 months, whereas the US Food and Drug Administration’s classification of a nonunion is those presenting ≥9 months without showing healing for 3 consecutive months. Infection was defined using the criteria from the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (with the presence of a draining sinus, erythema or abscess clinically, radiographically with osteolysis on radiographs or bone changes on MRI consistent with infection, positive intraoperative biopsies, and elevated serologic markers [C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate]) in case of PJI [23]. In case of FRI, we followed the same recommendations that were recently published to diagnose FRI [24]. Preoperative management prior to surgery included patient optimization such as correcting preoperative vitamin D deficiency, blood glucose levels, smoking cessation, and vascular evaluation when the pulses were not symmetric.
The surgical technique was standardized, and all surgeries were performed by the senior surgeon. Thorough debridement was performed, and cultures were taken at the initial surgery. All the nails used in this study were the same model from the same manufacturer (Trigen; Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA). These standard intramedullary nails were coated using silicone tubing of either 11 mm or 12.5 mm diameter and Palacos cement (Heraeus Medical, Hanau, Germany) containing 1 gm of vancomycin and 3.6 gm of tobramycin per 40 gm of cement (Figure 1). The rods were then placed and locked under fluoroscopic guidance. The surgical technique has been previously described [1,13].
Postoperatively, 6 weeks of organism-specific antibiotics were given. In culture-negative infections, broad-spectrum antibiotics were used. When possible, in the culture-negative infections, historical cultures were used to guide antibiotic therapy. Antibiotic management was directed by the infectious disease consultant. The combination of local vancomycin and tobramycin is favored in the treatment of osteomyelitis [25]. Chemical prophylaxis for venous thromboembolus was used for 6 weeks. Postoperative weight bearing was initiated as soon as possible, based upon the size of the bone defect. All patients who underwent knee arthrodesis were fully weight bearing immediately postoperative, even with segmental defects, because of the stability of the intercalary antibiotic cement spacer. All patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis were non-weight bearing for 6 weeks and then transitioned to a Charcot restraint orthotic walker (CROW) boot for full weight bearing. Range of motion was initiated immediately in all long bone nonunions and weight bearing was determined on an individual basis, dependent upon the size of the segmental defect.
All patients were monitored for resolution of infection and bone healing. Serial C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate values were obtained weekly for 6 weeks, followed by testing every 2 weeks to ensure that lab values returned to normal and stayed normalized following completion of 6 weeks of antibiotic therapy. Clinical monitoring of infection was performed routinely at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Radiographic evaluation was performed to assess for bone healing at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. If there was an equivocal radiographic evaluation at 12 weeks, a computed tomography scan was performed at 16 weeks to assess for bone bridging and healing of the long bone nonunion. Bone union was determined to be achieved when 3 of 4 cortices were united and the patient was fully weight bearing without pain. In patients with intercalary spacers and knee arthrodesis rods, bone union was not always the goal. There was often no further surgery indicated for medically debilitated patients. The remaining patients had either formal fusion with removal of the intercalary spacer or otherwise converted to revision TKA. A workflow diagram is available in Figure 2.
After removing identifying patient information, the data were recorded in Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). All statistical analyses were performed using MedCalc statistical software (version 20.009; MedCalc Software Ltd.; Ostend, Belgium). Demographics were documented using mean with standard deviation and percentages of the entire study population. Comparisons of proportions were compared with a chi-squared test or Fisher exact test for comparison of <5 cases per cell.

5. Conclusions

ACCINs are an effective technique for treating FRIs and infected long bone nonunions, as well as infected arthrodeses of the knee and ankle. In our review of 111 patients the overall limb salvage rate was 93.7%, and the majority of patients were successfully treated with a single surgical procedure. Future multicenter randomized studies comparing the outcome of ACCINs versus other modalities in the treatment of bone infection are encouraged.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics11060709/s1, Figure S1: Ankle open fracture dislocation. A and B: AP and lateral view plain radiographs showing ankle fracture dislocation. C: Clinical photograph showing a medial wound over the ankle. Figure S2: A, B, and C: AP and lateral view plain radiographs taken after the initial open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) procedure. D and E: Clinical photos showing infection at the ORIF site after hardware removal, on initial presentation to our institution. Figure S3: Intraoperative clinical photos after debridement and ankle fusion using an antibiotic cement-coated intramedullary locked nail. Figure S4: AP and lateral postoperative plain radiographs showing hindfoot fusion using an ACCIN and a missing (excised) distal segment of the fibula. Notice, the cement coating on the tip of the nail (gray arrow). Figure S5: Clinical photos of the leg condition during follow-up. Figure S6: AP and lateral radiographs at the final follow-up showing united ankle fusion at the final follow-up. Figure S7: Clinical photographs showing the patient fully weight bearing on both lower limbs. Front and side views of the left foot and ankle show the skin condition at the last follow-up.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.D.C., A.H.E. and M.G.G.; methodology, J.D.C., A.H.E., S.G. and M.G.G.; validation, J.D.C., A.H.E., S.G. and M.G.G.; formal analysis, J.D.C., A.H.E. and M.G.G.; investigation, J.D.C., A.H.E., S.G. and M.G.G.; data curation, A.H.E., S.G., N.P. and M.G.G.; writing—Original draft preparation, J.D.C. and A.H.E.; writing—review and editing, J.D.C., A.H.E., S.G. and M.G.G.; visualization, J.D.C., A.H.E. and M.G.G.; supervision, J.D.C., A.H.E. and M.G.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the LifeBridge Health Institutional Review Board determined that this study was exempt from full review (decision date 24 March 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was not required as it was a retrospective review of medical records.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy concerns with protected health information.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Robert P. Farley, BS, for his invaluable assistance with the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

No funding was received to conduct this study. JDC is a consultant for Zimmer Biomet, Bonesupport, and Smith & Nephew, and receives fellowship support from Biocomposites. The spouse of JDC receives royalties from the University of Florida. The following organizations supported the institution of JDC, AHE, NP, SG, and MGG: DePuy Synthes, NuVasive Specialized Orthopedics, Orthofix, OrthoPediatrics, Paragon 28, Pega Medical, Smith & Nephew, Stryker, Treace Medical Concepts, and WishBone Medical Inc. AHE, NP, SG, and MGG do not have any other financial disclosures to report.

References

  1. Thonse, R.; Conway, J. Antibiotic cement-coated interlocking nail for the treatment of infected nonunions and segmental bone defects. J. Orthop. Trauma 2007, 21, 258–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mauffrey, C.; Butler, N.; Hake, M.E. Fabrication of an interlocked antibiotic/cement-coated carbon fiber nail for the treatment of long bone osteomyelitis. J. Orthop. Trauma 2016, 30 (Suppl. 2), S23–S24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Makhdom, A.M.; Buksbaum, J.; Rozbruch, S.R.; Da Cunha, R.; Fragomen, A.T. Antibiotic cement-coated interlocking intramedullary nails in the treatment of septic complex lower extremity reconstruction; a retrospective analysis with two year minimum follow up. J. Bone Jt. Infect. 2020, 5, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pruthi, V.; Ummat, A.; Singh, M.; Pathak, S.; Verma, V.; Sharma, A. Use of custom-made antibiotic coated intra-medullary nail in treatment of infected non-union of long bones. Indian J. Public Health Res. Dev. 2020, 11, 802–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rice, O.M.; Phelps, K.D.; Seymour, R.; Askam, B.M.; Kempton, L.M.; Chen, A.; Dart, S.; Hsu, J.R. Single-stage treatment of fracture-related infections. J. Orthop. Trauma 2021, 35 (Suppl. 2), S42–S43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pawar, A.; Dikmen, G.; Fragomen, A.; Rozbruch, S.R. Antibiotic-coated nail for fusion of infection Charcot ankles. Foot Ankle Int. 2013, 34, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Obremskey, W.T.; Metsemakers, W.-J.; Schlatterer, D.R.; Tetsworth, K.; Egol, K.; Kates, S.; McNally, M. ICM Orthopaedic Trauma Work Group. Musculoskeletal infection in orthopaedic trauma: Assessment of the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2020, 102, e44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Metsemakers, W.J.; Morgenstern, M.; McNally, M.A.; Moriarty, T.F.; McFadyen, I.; Scarborough, M.; Athanasou, N.A.; Ochsner, P.E.; Kuehl, R.; Raschke, M.; et al. Fracture-related infection: A consensus on definition from an international expert group. Injury 2018, 49, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ismat, A.; Walter, N.; Baertl, S.; Mika, J.; Lang, S.; Kerschbaum, M.; Alt, V.; Rupp, M. Antibiotic cement coating in orthopedic surgery: A systematic review of reported clinical techniques. J. Orthop. Traumatol. 2021, 22, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Karek, M.R.; Jackson, N.M.; Flynn, J.C.; Vaidya, R.; Markel, D.C. Elution profiles of two methods of antibiotic tibial nail preparations. Orthopedics 2017, 40, e436–e442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lopas, L.A.; Albertson, S.; Solomon, E.; Watson, D.T.; Shah, A.R.; Maxson, B.J.; Infante, A.F.; Donohue, D.; Downes, K.L.; Sanders, R.W.; et al. Outcomes of various antibiotic cement coated intramedullary implants on the treatment of long bone septic nonunion. J. Orthop. Trauma 2022, 36, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Shyam, A.K.; Sancheti, P.K.; Patel, S.K.; Rocha, S.; Pradhan, C.; Patil, A. Use of antibiotic cement-impregnated intramedullary nail in treatment of infected non-union of long bones. Indian J. Orthop. 2009, 43, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Conway, J.; Mansour, J.; Kotze, K.; Specht, S.; Shabtai, L. Antibiotic cement-coated rods: An effective treatment for infected long bones and prosthetic joint nonunions. Bone Jt. J. 2014, 96, 1349–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Abalkhail, T.B.; Elhessy, A.H.; Conway, J.D. Removal of antibiotic cement-coated interlocking nails. J. Orthop. Trauma 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schmidmaier, G.; Kerstan, M.; Schwabe, P.; Südkamp, N.; Raschke, M. Clinical experiences in the use of a gentamicin-coated titanium nail in tibia fractures. Injury 2017, 48, 2235–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Moghaddam, A.; Weis, J.; Haubruck, P.; Raven, T.F.; Addali, A.; Schmidmaier, G. Evaluation of the clinical use of the ETN PROtect in non-union therapy. Injury 2019, 50 (Suppl. S3), 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jorge-Mora, A.; Amhaz-Escanlar, S.; Fernandez-Pose, S.; García-Iglesias, A.; Mandia-Mancebo, F.; Franco-Trepat, E.; Guillán-Fresco, M.; Pino-Minguez, J. Commercially available antiobiotic-laden PMMA-covered locking nails for the treatment of fracture-related infections—A retrospective case analysis of 10 cases. J. Bone Jt. Infect. 2019, 4, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. De Mao, D.; Cannari, F.M.; Petriello, L.; Persiani, P.; Villani, C. Gentamicin-coated tibia nail in fractures and nonunion to reduce fracture-related infections: A systematic review. Molecules 2020, 25, 5471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cierny, G., 3rd; Mader, J.T.; Penninck, J.J. A clinical staging system for adult osteomyelitis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2003, 414, 7–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Schmitz, J.P.; Hollinger, J.O. The critical size defect as an experimental model for craniomandibulofacial nonunions. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1986, 205, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, J.S.; Gorbachova, T.; Morrison, W.B.; Haims, A.H. Imaging-guided bone biopsy for osteomyelitis: Are there factors associated with positive or negative cultures? Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007, 188, 1529–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tan, T.L.; Kheir, M.M.; Shohat, N.; Tan, D.D.; Kheir, M.; Chen, C.; Parvizi, J. Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection: An update on what to expect. JBJS Open Access 2018, 3, e0060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Parvizi, J.; Tan, T.L.; Goswami, K.; Higuera, C.; Della Valle, C.; Chen, A.F.; Shohat, N. The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: An evidence-based and validated criteria. J. Arthroplast. 2018, 33, 1309–1314.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Govaert, G.A.M.; Kuehl, R.; Atkins, B.L.; Trampuz, A.; Morgenstern, M.; Obremskey, W.T.; Verhofstad, M.H.J.; McNally, M.A.; Metsemakers, W.-J.; Fracture-Related Infection (FRI) Consensus Group. Diagnosing fracture-related infection: Current concepts and recommendations. J. Orthop. Trauma 2020, 34, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pargas, C.D.; Elhessy, A.H.; Abouei, M.; Gesheff, M.G.; Conway, J.D. Tobramycin blood levels after local antibiotic treatment of bone and soft tissue infection. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Photo of an antibiotic-coated hindfoot fusion rod (Trigen; Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA). The width of the nail with cement is 12 mm.
Figure 1. Photo of an antibiotic-coated hindfoot fusion rod (Trigen; Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA). The width of the nail with cement is 12 mm.
Antibiotics 11 00709 g001
Figure 2. Workflow diagram. CRP, C-reactive protein; CT, computed tomography; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HbA1c, blood sugar; ID, infectious diseases; IV, intravenous; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 2. Workflow diagram. CRP, C-reactive protein; CT, computed tomography; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HbA1c, blood sugar; ID, infectious diseases; IV, intravenous; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Antibiotics 11 00709 g002
Table 1. Complications.
Table 1. Complications.
Complicationn (%)Treatment
Symptomatic hardware10 (40%)Removal
Superficial infection6 (24%)Intravenous antibiotics ± local wound care
Nerve compression5 (20%)Decompression
Joint contracture2 (8%)Soft-tissue release
Hematoma1 (4%)Irrigation and debridement with drain insertion
Broken hardware1 (4%)Revised with another fusion nail
Table 2. Rod Removal.
Table 2. Rod Removal.
Reasonn (%)
Recurrent infection29 (43.9%)
2nd stage of TKA16 (24.2%)
Symptomatic hardware10 (15.2%)
Amputation7 (10.6%)
Nonunion2 (3%)
Planned by surgeon1 (1.5%)
Broken hardware1 (1.5%)
TKA, total knee arthroplasty.
Table 3. Demographics.
Table 3. Demographics.
Demographicn (%)
Male57 (51.4)
Female54 (48.6)
Age56.9 years (range, 13–83 years)
BMI33.4 (range, 17.5–52.4 kg/m2)
Follow-up29.2 months (range, 6–93 months)
Host type A5 (4.5)
Host type B106 (95.5)
Preoperative diagnosis
Infected total joint43 (38.7)
Infected fusion23 (20.7)
Fracture-related infection23 (20.7)
Infected nonunion22 (19.8)
ACCIN locations
Knee fusion nail51 (46)
Hindfoot fusion36 (32.4)
Tibia nail13 (11.7)
Femur retrograde nail6 (5.4)
Femur antegrade nail5 (4.5)
Patients with segmental defects, total35 (31.5)Defect size = 6.1 cm (range, 0.5–24 cm)
Infected TKA22 (19.8)Defect size = 6.7 cm (range, 1–24 cm)
Others13 (11.7)Defect size = 5.2 cm (range, 0.5–12 cm)
ACCIN, antibiotic cement-coated interlocking nail; BMI, body mass index; TKA, total knee arthroplasty.
Table 4. Microbiological Cultures.
Table 4. Microbiological Cultures.
Culturen (%)
MSSA19 (17.1)
Multiple organisms14 (12.6)
MRSA15 (13.5)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa4 (3.6)
Enterobacter cloacae4 (3.6)
Corynebacterium3 (2.7)
Streptococcus agalactiae2 (1.8)
Proteus mirabilis1 (0.9)
Enterococcus faecalis1 (0.9)
Candida albicans1 (0.9)
Negative47 (42.3)
MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Conway, J.D.; Elhessy, A.H.; Galiboglu, S.; Patel, N.; Gesheff, M.G. Efficacy of Infection Eradication in Antibiotic Cement-Coated Intramedullary Nails for Fracture-Related Infections, Nonunions, and Fusions. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11060709

AMA Style

Conway JD, Elhessy AH, Galiboglu S, Patel N, Gesheff MG. Efficacy of Infection Eradication in Antibiotic Cement-Coated Intramedullary Nails for Fracture-Related Infections, Nonunions, and Fusions. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(6):709. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11060709

Chicago/Turabian Style

Conway, Janet D., Ahmed H. Elhessy, Selin Galiboglu, Nirav Patel, and Martin G. Gesheff. 2022. "Efficacy of Infection Eradication in Antibiotic Cement-Coated Intramedullary Nails for Fracture-Related Infections, Nonunions, and Fusions" Antibiotics 11, no. 6: 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11060709

APA Style

Conway, J. D., Elhessy, A. H., Galiboglu, S., Patel, N., & Gesheff, M. G. (2022). Efficacy of Infection Eradication in Antibiotic Cement-Coated Intramedullary Nails for Fracture-Related Infections, Nonunions, and Fusions. Antibiotics, 11(6), 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11060709

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop