Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Biological Activity of Antimicrobial Agents, 2nd Volume
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Iron Chelators, Super-Polyphenols, Show Antimicrobial Effects against Cariogenic Streptococcus mutans
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/antibiotics12111563
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sensitization of Gram-Negative Bacteria to Aminoglycosides with 2-Aminoimidazole Adjuvants

by
Ashley N. Crotteau
,
Veronica B. Hubble
,
Santiana A. Marrujo
,
Anne E. Mattingly
,
Roberta J. Melander
and
Christian Melander
*
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2023, 12(11), 1563; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12111563
Submission received: 25 September 2023 / Revised: 20 October 2023 / Accepted: 21 October 2023 / Published: 25 October 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In 2019, five million deaths associated with antimicrobial resistance were reported by The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Acinetobacter baumannii, a Gram-negative bacterial pathogen, is among the list of urgent threats. Previously, we reported 2-aminoimidazole (2-AI) adjuvants that potentiate macrolide activity against A. baumannii. In this study, we identify several of these adjuvants that sensitize A. baumannii to aminoglycoside antibiotics. Lead compounds 1 and 7 lower the tobramycin (TOB) minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against the TOB-resistant strain AB5075 from 128 μg/mL to 2 μg/mL at 30 μM. In addition, the lead compounds lower the TOB MIC against the TOB-susceptible strain AB19606 from 4 μg/mL to 1 μg/mL and 0.5 μg/mL, respectively, at 30 μM and 15 μM. The evolution of resistance to TOB and 1 in AB5075 revealed mutations in genes related to protein synthesis, the survival of bacteria under environmental stressors, bacteriophages, and proteins containing Ig-like domains.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, there has been a significant increase in infections caused by multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria. In the United States alone, ca. 2.8 million people are infected by MDR bacteria annually, resulting in the loss of more than 35,000 lives [1]. Some of the most problematic MDR bacterial species have been termed the ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) for that fact that they evade/escape commonly used antibiotics [2].
Despite the increased incidence of MDR bacterial infections, investment in the development of new antibiotics has slowed considerably over the last few decades [3]. Within the past 60 years, only two novel classes of antibiotics have been introduced to the clinic, the lipopeptides (i.e., daptomycin) and the oxazolidinones (i.e., linezolid), both of which are Gram-positive selective, and resistance to these antimicrobial agents emerged within just a few years of deployment [4,5]. Gram-negative bacteria are inherently more resistant to many antibiotics than Gram-positive bacteria, in part due to the low permeability of the outer membrane (OM), contributing to the failure to identify novel Gram-negative acting antibiotics in recent decades [6].
The aminoglycosides are oligosaccharide-based antibiotics that are commonly employed to treat infections caused by both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [7]. Resistance to aminoglycosides is increasingly prevalent and occurs through multiple mechanisms, including enzymatic drug modification, target site modification, and changes in cell permeability [7]. In addition to aminoglycoside resistance, patient toxicity is a cause for concern. Ototoxicity is observed in about 10% of patients receiving aminoglycosides intravenously [8], while nephrotoxicity is seen in 10–25% of therapeutic courses [9]. In order to improve and extend aminoglycoside therapy, both resistance and toxicity need to be addressed. One approach to overcoming resistance is to pair aminoglycosides with other antibiotics, specifically β-lactams, which act synergistically to enhance aminoglycoside uptake [10].
Another approach to overcome bacterial resistance that has been employed by us and others is the use of antibiotic adjuvants [11]. Adjuvants are compounds that typically have little to no inherent antibacterial activity, but instead enhance the activity of an antibiotic. Adjuvants can be employed to render resistant bacterial strains susceptible to an antibiotic [12], or to further enhance activity against a susceptible strain, thereby enabling lower antibiotic dosing which has the potential to reduce dose-dependent toxicity [13,14,15]. To identify new classes of adjuvants, our group has investigated analogs of sponge-derived marine alkaloids containing a 2-aminoimidazole (2-AI) heterocycle and has demonstrated that properly derivatized 2-AIs potentiate a variety of antibiotics against a multitude of MDR and susceptible bacteria. For example, we have demonstrated that specific 2-AI analogs enhance the efficacy of colistin, the antibiotic of last resort used to treat MDR Gram-negative infections, against both resistant and susceptible strains [16,17]. Recently, we have shown that aryl 2-AIs and dimeric 2-AIs potentiate the Gram-positive selective macrolide class of antibiotics against the Gram-negative bacterium A. baumannii [18,19,20].
Preliminary mechanism of action studies led us to hypothesize that macrolide potentiation in A. baumannii occurs as a result of altered lipooligosaccharide (LOS) biosynthesis/presentation [19], which leads to an increase in membrane permeability. As molecules that increase membrane permeability through direct binding act as adjuvants for a wide variety of antibiotic classes [21,22,23], we investigated the possibility that aryl-2-AI adjuvants potentiate aminoglycoside activity against A. baumannii and potentially other Gram-negative pathogens. Herein, we report that aryl 2-AI adjuvants reverse aminoglycoside resistance in aminoglycoside-resistant A. baumannii, and K. pneumoniae. In addition, we show that these compounds further sensitize aminoglycoside-susceptible strains to the effects of aminoglycosides. These results highlight the potential use of adjuvants to both overcome aminoglycoside resistance and mitigate aminoglycoside toxicity.

2. Results

2.1. Initial Screen

We began this study by evaluating five 2-AI-aryl analogs (Figure 1) that potentiate clarithromycin against A. baumannii [18,19] for their effect upon tobramycin (TOB) activity against A. baumannii strain 5075 (AB5075, tobramycin resistant) and A. baumannii strain 19606 (AB19606, tobramycin susceptible). Initially, we determined the MIC of each compound individually (Table S1). Compound 4 [18] is the least toxic, returning an MIC of >200 μM against both strains. Compounds 1 [18] and 2 [24] registered MICs of 100 μM against both strains, while compounds 3 [24] and 5 [18] returned MICs ranging from 25–100 μM. Next, the MIC of TOB was determined in the presence and absence of adjuvant at 30% MIC (Table 1). The activity was defined based upon the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoint for TOB against A. baumannii (4 μg/mL) [25] in AB5075, or by a minimum of four-fold reduction in the TOB MIC in AB19606.
Compound 1, which contains a urea linker, para-2-AI, and 3,4-dichlorophenyl tail, lowers the TOB MIC from 128 μg/mL to 2 μg/mL (64-fold) against AB5075, and from 4 μg/mL to 1 μg/mL (four-fold) against AB19606, both at 30 μM. Similar to 1, compounds 2 and 3, which both contain an amide linker, para-2-AI, and a di-substituted aryl tail, also lower the TOB MIC in AB19606, returning MICs of 1 μg/mL (four-fold) and 0.5 μg/mL (eight-fold), respectively. However, these compounds do not lower the TOB MIC to the breakpoint in AB5075. Compound 4, which is similar in structure to compound 2, differing only by the addition of a meta-fluoro substituent on the phenyl core, reduces the TOB MIC four-fold and two-fold against AB5075 and AB19606, respectively, at 60 μM. Compound 5, which contains a urea linker, para-2-AI, and 3,5-dichlorophenyl tail, reduces the TOB MIC by the same magnitude as compound 4 against both strains but was tested at a much lower concentration (7.5 μM) due to its higher standalone toxicity.

2.2. Follow-Up Screen of Additional Analogues

Based upon this initial screen, an additional 41 related analogs from our in-house library were screened for potentiation of TOB (Figure S1), leading to the identification of several compounds with adjuvant activity against both AB5075 and AB19606 (Table 2 and Table S3), the seven most active compounds of which are depicted in Figure 2 (6–12). Compounds 6 [18] and 7 [26] lower the TOB MIC against both the resistant and susceptible A. baumannii strains. Compound 6, which has an amide linker, para 2-AI, and a 3-chloro-4-trifluoromethylphenyl tail, lowers the TOB MIC from 128 μg/mL to 4 μg/mL (32-fold) against AB5075 and from 4 μg/mL to 0.5 μg/mL (8-fold) against AB19606, both at 30 μM. Compound 7, which contains a urea linker, meta-2-AI, and a 3,5-dibromophenyl tail, potentiates TOB to the same degree as compound 6 against AB19606, but at a lower concentration (15 μM), and similar activity against AB5075 reducing the TOB MIC from 128 μg/mL to 2 μg/mL (64-fold). Compound 8 [27], which has an amide linker, para-2-AI, and 3,5-difluorophenyl tail, has an identical activity to 6 against AB5075 at 60 μM, however, is inactive against AB19606. Similar in structure to 6, compound 9 [18], which contains an amide linker, the meta-fluoro substituent on the phenyl core, and a 3,4-disubstitutedphenyl tail, lowers the TOB MIC from 4 μg/mL to 0.0625 μg/mL (64-fold) against AB19606. Compound 10 [20], which is a symmetrical para-2-AI dimer, lowers the TOB MIC from 4 μg/mL to 0.25 μg/mL against AB19606. Both 9 and 10 exhibit minimal activity (4- to 8-fold reduction in MIC) against AB5075. The methoxy substituted 3,5-dichloro tail analogue 11 [18] reduces the TOB MIC 8-fold against AB5075, and 4-fold against AB19606. Finally, the meta-meta linked dimer 12 [20] lowers the TOB MIC 16-fold against AB5075 and 8-fold against AB19606.

2.3. Activity of Lead Compounds with Additional Aminoglycosides

We next evaluated whether lead compounds sensitize A. baumannii to the additional aminoglycosides: streptomycin (STM), kanamycin (KAN), neomycin (NEO), and gentamicin (GEN). Compounds 1, 6, 7, and 8 were chosen for evaluation against AB5075, and compounds 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 10 were chosen for evaluation against AB19606. AB5075 is resistant to all aminoglycosides tested, while AB19606 is susceptible to kanamycin and neomycin, but resistant to streptomycin and gentamicin. Compounds lowered the STM MIC ranging from 4- to 64-fold in AB5075 (Table 3) and 0- to 32-fold in AB19606 (Table 4). Compound 6 is the most active potentiator of STM of the compounds tested, reducing the MIC from 2048 μg/mL to 32 μg/mL (64-fold) in AB5075 and 512 μg/mL to 16 μg/mL (32-fold) in AB19606, both at 30 μM.
We next assessed KAN potentiation in AB5075 and noted that none of the compounds lowered the KAN MIC more than 2-fold, registering MICs no lower than 1024 μg/mL (from 2048 μg/mL). Four compounds, however, do lower the KAN MIC to a range of 0.5–2 μg/mL (from 8 μg/mL) in AB19606 (Table 5). Against AB19606, compound 10 is the most active, eliciting a 16-fold reduction of the KAN MIC at a concentration of 60 μM. Compounds 6 and 7 are also active, returning KAN MICs of 1 μg/mL at concentrations of 30 and 15 μM, respectively.
The third aminoglycoside evaluated was NEO, and we observed that compound 8 has the highest activity against AB5075, lowering the MIC by 16-fold, from 64 μg/mL to 4 μg/mL. All other compounds are markedly less active, and only potentiate NEO against AB5075 by no more than 4-fold. In AB19606, the compounds active with TOB also showed adjuvant activity with NEO. All compounds, with the exception of compound 1, lower the NEO MIC by 4- to 16-fold (from 8 μg/mL), with compound 10 being the most active, lowering the NEO MIC to 0.5 μg/mL at 60 μM.
Finally, we evaluated compounds for potentiation of GEN. Interestingly, against AB19606 these compounds exhibit the most potent activity in combination with GEN when compared to the other aminoglycosides. All compounds lower the GEN MIC by at least 4-fold, with only one compound (6) not lowering the MIC to the GEN breakpoint (4 μg/mL) or below. Compound 10 is the most potent, lowering the MIC by 64-fold to 0.25 μg/mL in AB19606. In AB5075, however, no compounds lower the GEN MIC to the breakpoint. The largest drop in GEN MIC is affected by compound 8, which lowers the MIC to 16 μg/mL from 512 μg/mL in AB5075.

2.4. Activity of Lead Compounds against Other Gram-Negative Pathogens

Next, we probed the spectrum of activity of lead adjuvants 1, 3, 5, 10, 11, and 12 against two additional Gram-negative species K. pneumoniae and E. coli. A TOB-resistant and a TOB-sensitive strain of K. pneumoniae (KP1705/KP43816), and a TOB-resistant and a TOB-sensitive strain of E. coli (EC197/EC199) were assayed (Table 5). Compound 12 shows a modest 4-fold reduction in TOB MIC against the TOB-resistant strain KP1705 at 60 μM, while compounds 1, 5, and 10 lower the TOB MIC against the TOB-susceptible strain KP43816 at concentrations of 15 μM, 15 μM, and 30 μM, respectively. No TOB adjuvant activity was observed against either of the E. coli strains, and no activity was seen for compound 11 against any strain.

2.5. Effect of Divalent Cations on Adjuvant Activity

We probed if the TOB adjuvant activity of the lead compounds would be affected by the stabilization of the OM with the addition of MgCl2 (Table S5). Supplementation with MgCl2 (20 mM) led to a loss or significant decrease in activity. In AB5075, the TOB adjuvant activity dropped from a 64-fold reduction to only a 4-fold reduction in activity. Similarly, in AB19606, the activity went from an 8-fold reduction to a 2-fold reduction with the addition of MgCl2.

2.6. Evolution of TOB Resistance in the Presence and Absence of Adjuvant and Identification of Mutated Genes in Evolved Strains

To gauge the effect of adjuvants on resistance acquisition, an evolution experiment was carried out by serially passaging AB5075 in the presence of TOB, at the MIC and ± 2-fold the MIC, both in the presence and absence of 15 μM adjuvant 1. MICs were recorded every other day for eight days (Table 6). Unsurprisingly, resistance in the bacterial population serially passaged in TOB only increased, with an MIC of 4096 μg/mL (32-fold) recorded after passaging for six days. TOB resistance in the population of AB5075 passaged in the presence of TOB and 1 also increased, with a 16-fold increase to 2048 μg/mL on day eight. No major differences were seen in the evolution of TOB resistance when serially passaged in TOB only or in TOB + 1 (Table 6). Compound 1, at 15 μM, does not lower the TOB MIC against the strain evolved in the presence of TOB only, returning an MIC of 2048 μg/mL (Table S6). In addition, TOB potentiation, in the presence of compound 1 at 15 μM against AB5075 serially passaged in TOB + 1, was lost by day four, showing only a 2-fold change in MIC in the presence and absence of 15 μM compound 1 (Table S7).
Whole genome sequencing revealed mutations in ten shared genes between the two evolved strains (Table 7). Eleven mutations were observed in alkyl hydroperoxide reductase subunit F (ahpF). Mutations were also observed in genes encoding: an aldehyde dehydrogenase, a bacteriophage protein, a stress-induced protein, a replication initiation factor domain-containing protein, an Ig-like domain repeat protein, and four hypothetical proteins. One of the hypothetical proteins is homologous with an elongation factor Tu (tuf), while another has 98% homology with a replication protein previously found in A. baumannii [28]. No homology was detected for the remaining two hypothetical proteins via NCBI Blast.

3. Discussion

Our initial screen revealed that in addition to acting as a macrolide adjuvant, compound 1 also potentiates the aminoglycoside TOB against the resistant strain AB5075 (64-fold reduction in MIC), in addition to moderately increasing activity against the susceptible strain AB19606 (4-fold reduction in MIC). A follow-up screen identified several additional active compounds that sensitize both resistant and susceptible A. baumannii to TOB, the most active of which are compound 7 (64-fold reduction against AB5075), and compound 9 (64-fold reduction against AB19606).
Lead compounds do not lower the MIC of any additional aminoglycosides to the breakpoint in AB5075, but do potentiate all the additional aminoglycosides examined, with the exception of STM against AB19606 (to which AB19606 is highly resistant). Lead compounds also do not potentiate TOB against E. coli, and exhibit very little TOB potentiation against K. pneumoniae, suggesting a selectivity for TOB, and for A. baumannii. Comparatively, Yarlagadda et al. reported that the natural product venturicidin A potentiates GEN 4- to 8-fold against some strains of A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa, but not E. coli or K. pneumoniae, and was posited to act via inhibition of ATP synthesis [29]. Hui et al. reported moderate enhancement (4-fold reduction in MIC) of KAN and GEN activity against A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae by a benzoisothiazolone that was shown to interact with the peroxidase OhrB from A. baumannii 19606 [30].
Mg2+ ions stabilize the OM through electrostatic interactions [31], and known OM disrupters, such as pentamidine and PMBN, do not potentiate rifampicin in the presence of Mg2+ ions [22]. Upon supplementation of the media with MgCl2, adjuvant activity is essentially eradicated, which could be due to inhibition of uptake of the adjuvant, or to direct blocking of adjuvant activity. Marrujo et al. have previously shown that the addition of exogenous LOS from AB5075 resulted in no loss in macrolide potentiation activity of the class of dimeric 2-AI adjuvants to which compound 10 belongs [20], suggesting that the 2-AI adjuvants do not directly bind the membrane. Further mechanistic studies to determine if adjuvants are affecting biosynthesis or assembly of LOS are ongoing.
Unlike previous resistance evolution studies with related adjuvants and antibiotic classes [17,18,32], the serial passage in TOB, in both the absence and presence of 1, leads to dramatic increases in the TOB MIC of 32-fold and 16-fold, respectively. Adjuvant 1 does not potentiate TOB against either evolved strain. Exploration of shared gene mutations between bacterial populations evolved in the presence of either TOB alone or TOB and adjuvant 1 revealed that by far the highest number of mutations occurred in the alkylhydroperoxidase subunit F gene (ahpF), which encodes a subunit of the ROS detoxification enzyme AhpCF [33]. It has been reported by Dwyer et al. that AhpCF overexpression confers some protection from the oxidative stress-induced lethality of bactericidal antibiotics including GEN [34], while Lv et al. showed that overexpression enhances resistance to heat-shock-induced TOB lethality [35] in E. coli. The latter report also showed that heat shock similarly potentiates TOB against A. baumannii, although the mechanistic basis of this phenomenon in A. baumannii was not explored [35]. Aldehyde dehydrogenase plays a role in a variety of metabolic processes, including redox regulation and environmental stress defense, and has been reported to be differentially expressed between MDR and non-MDR A. baumannii isolates [36]. It is not surprising that mutations that impact the ability of the bacterium to respond to ROS and other stressors lead to reduced susceptibility to TOB; however, the effects of the mutations on protein function remain to be determined.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strains, Media, and Antimicrobial Agents

A. baumannii strain 5075 was obtained from Walter Reed Army Institute for Research (WRAIR). A. baumannii strain 19606, K. pneumoniae strains BAA-1705, and 43816, and E. coli strains BAA-197, and BAA-199 were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Stock cultures of these strains were stored in 25% glycerol and maintained at −80 °C. Prior to use colonies were grown on LB (Lennox) agar. Cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton II Broth (CAMHB) (cat# 21322) was purchased from BD Diagnostics (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). LB broth (cat# BP1427-2) was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Tobramycin (cat# T2503) and gentamicin (cat# G0383) were purchased from TCI. Streptomycin (cat# S9137), kanamycin (cat# K1377), and neomycin (cat# N6386) were purchased from Sigma Life Science (Burlington, VT, USA). All assays were completed in duplicate and repeated at least two separate times. Syntheses of compounds have been previously reported, and compounds were dissolved as their HCl salts in molecular biology grade DMSO as 5, 10, or 100 mM stock solutions and stored at −20 °C. Aminoglycosides were dissolved in sterile water.

4.2. Broth Microdilution Method for Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Determination

Day cultures (4–6 h) in CAMHB were subcultured to 5 × 105 CFU/mL in fresh CAMHB. Aliquots (1 mL) were placed in culture tubes and compound was added from 100 mM stock samples in DMSO, such that the compound concentration equaled highest concentration tested (200 μM). Then 200 μL of sample were dispensed into the first row of a 96-well microtiter plate, while the remaining rows, except the final row, were filled with 100 μL of the initial bacterial subculture. The final row was filled with CAMHB to serve as a sterility control. Row 1 wells were mixed five times, and then 100 μL was transferred to the second row. The second row was then mixed five times and 100 μL was transferred to row 3. This process was repeated until all rows, except the final row had been mixed. Plates were covered with GLAD Press n’ Seal and incubated under stationary conditions at 37 °C for 16–18 h. The OD600 of each well was recorded using a BioTek Synergy HTX multi-mode reader plate reader from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA). MIC values were determined as the minimum concentration required to achieve 90% bacterial growth inhibition compared to growth in untreated wells [37].

4.3. Broth Microdilution Method for Measurement of Aminoglycoside Potentiation

Day cultures (6 h) of each bacterial strain in CAMHB were subcultured to 5 × 105 CFU/mL in CAMHB. Aliquots (4 mL) were placed in culture tubes and the compound was dosed from 5, 10, or 100 mM stock samples to give the desired concentration of the compounds to be tested. An amount of 1 mL of the resulting solution was aliquoted into a separate culture tube and dosed with antibiotics at the highest concentration to be tested. Bacteria treated with antibiotics alone served as the control. Row 1 of a 96-well plate was filled with 200 μL of the antibiotic/compound aliquot, and rows 2–11 were filled with 100 μL each of the remaining 4 mL bacterial subcultures containing adjuvant at the desired concentration. Row 12 was filled with CAMHB to serve as a sterility control. Row 1 was mixed five times and 100 μL was transferred to row 2, which was then mixed five times and transferred to row 3. This process was repeated until all rows had been mixed, except for row 11 which had only compound to serve as a control to monitor toxicity. Plates were covered with GLAD Press n’ Seal and incubated under stationary conditions at 37 °C for 16–18 h. The OD600 of each well was recorded. MIC values were determined as the minimum concentration required to achieve 90% bacterial growth inhibition compared to growth in untreated wells.

4.4. Evolution of Tobramycin Resistance in A. baumannii

A. baumannii strain 5075 was grown in CAMHB overnight and subcultured to 5 x 105 CFU/mL in 6 mL of fresh CAMHB. Adjuvant 1 was dosed at 15 μM from a DMSO stock solution. Aliquots (1 mL) were placed into five separate culture tubes and tobramycin was dosed at the desired concentrations from a stock solution and incubated with shaking at 37 °C overnight. Conditions were as follows: 2× and 4× above the active tobramycin MIC (no visible bacterial growth) with or without 15 μM adjuvant 1, 2× and 4× below the active tobramycin MIC with or without 15 μM adjuvant 1, and tobramycin at the active MIC with or without 15 μM adjuvant 1. After 24 h bacterial growth was evaluated, and the sample with the highest tobramycin concentration where turbidity was observed was subcultured to 5 × 105 CFU/mL and incubated with shaking overnight. This process was repeated for eight days with MICs determined by broth microdilution as described above every two days (Table S5). For whole genome sequencing, the day eight evolved AB5075 cultures were plated on LB agar and let grow overnight. A single colony was picked and grown overnight in CAMHB. The overnight culture was centrifuged at 5000 rpm (1700 g) for three minutes. The pellets were washed with 0.5 mL of sterile water and centrifuged at 5000 rpm for three minutes. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellets were resuspended in 200 μL DNA suspension buffer (0.1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris HCl). Whole genome sequencing and analysis (Supplementary Excel) of the AB5075 evolved strains, as well as the parent, were carried out by CosmosID.

4.5. Sequencing Data Analysis

CosmosID provided an Excel document with a list of genetic differences between the parent and evolved AB5075 strains and an annotated AB5075 reference (gabab5075v1.0: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCF_000770605.1, accessed on 17 October 2022). Further analysis was completed using the provided list where the differences between wild-type AB5075 and the reference strain were compared to the differences between evolved AB5075 strains and the reference strain. A list of genetic differences between the parent AB5075 and evolved strains was compiled. Hypothetical proteins were analyzed using NCBI Blast.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we report 2-AI analogs that sensitize MDR and susceptible strains of Gram-negative bacteria to aminoglycoside antibiotics. Compounds 1 and 7 are the most active adjuvants against both the resistant and susceptible strains of A. baumannii, enhancing TOB activity by 64-fold against the MDR strain, AB5075, and up to 8-fold against the TOB susceptible strain AB19606. Compound 9 is the most active adjuvant against the TOB susceptible, AB19606, increasing the TOB MIC by 64-fold. Compound 10 is the most effective adjuvant with other aminoglycosides including, NEO, GEN, and KAN against AB19606. In addition, compound 10 exhibits the most potent activity with TOB against K. pneumoniae. Finally, a resistance evolution experiment revealed ten genes including ahpF, which encodes an alkylhydroperoxidase subunit, that may play a role in aminoglycoside resistance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics12111563/s1, Table S1: Minimum inhibitory concentration data of initial compounds tested against AB5075 and AB19606; Figure S1: Structures of additional analogs tested in combination with TOB against A. baumannii; Table S2: Additional compound MICs against AB5075 and AB19606; Table S3: TOB MICs in combination with all additional analogs against AB5075 and AB19606; Table S4: Compound MICs against a panel of K. pneumoniae and E. coli strains; Table S5: TOB MICs in the presence of 20 mM MgCl2; Table S6: Tobramycin MICs in (TOB only) evolved AB5075; Table S7: TOB potentiation in the presence and absence of compound 1 in AB5075 serially passaged in TOB +1; Supplemental Excel: Tab S1: Parent AB5075; Tab S2: TOB evolved AB5075; Tab S3: TOB + 1 evolved AB5075; Tab S4: Same gene differences (Evolved).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M. and R.J.M.; methodology, C.M., R.J.M. and A.E.M.; investigation, A.N.C., V.B.H., S.A.M. and A.E.M.; resources, C.M.; data curation, A.N.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.N.C.; writing—review and editing, A.N.C., R.J.M. and C.M.; supervision, C.M.; project administration, C.M.; funding acquisition, C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health, grant number RO1AI136904.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are provided in the manuscript and supplemental information.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. CDC. Antibiotic/Antimicrobial Resistance (AR/AMR); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2020.
  2. Mulani, M.S.; Kamble, E.E.; Kumkar, S.N.; Tawre, M.S.; Pardesi, K.R. Emerging Strategies to Combat ESKAPE Pathogens in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: A Review. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Klug, D.M.; Idiris, F.I.M.; Blaskovich, M.A.T.; von Delft, F.; Dowson, C.G.; Kirchhelle, C.; Roberts, A.P.; Singer, A.C.; Todd, M.H. There is no market for new antibiotics: This allows an open approach to research and development. Wellcome Open Res. 2021, 6, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Coates, A.R.; Halls, G.; Hu, Y. Novel classes of antibiotics or more of the same? Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 163, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Clatworthy, A.E.; Pierson, E.; Hung, D.T. Targeting virulence: A new paradigm for antimicrobial therapy. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007, 3, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hay, M.; Thomas, D.W.; Craighead, J.L.; Economides, C.; Rosenthal, J. Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Krause, K.M.; Serio, A.W.; Kane, T.R.; Connolly, L.E. Aminoglycosides: An Overview. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, 6, 5–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ariano, R.E.; Zelenitsky, S.A.; Kassum, D.A. Aminoglycoside-induced vestibular injury: Maintaining a sense of balance. Ann. Pharmacother. 2008, 42, 1282–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lopez-Novoa, J.M.; Quiros, Y.; Vicente, L.; Morales, A.I.; Lopez-Hernandez, F.J. New insights into the mechanism of aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity: An integrative point of view. Kidney Int. 2011, 79, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Labby, K.J.; Garneau-Tsodikova, S. Strategies to overcome the action of aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes for treating resistant bacterial infections. Future Med. Chem. 2013, 5, 1285–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kalan, L.; Wright, G.D. Antibiotic adjuvants: Multicomponent anti-infective strategies. Expert. Rev. Mol. Med. 2011, 13, e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Song, M.; Liu, Y.; Huang, X.; Ding, S.; Wang, Y.; Shen, J.; Zhu, K. A broad-spectrum antibiotic adjuvant reverses multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 1040–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lewis, K. Platforms for antibiotic discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2013, 12, 371–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rosenberg, C.R.; Fang, X.; Allison, K.R. Potentiating aminoglycoside antibiotics to reduce their toxic side effects. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0237948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Maiden, M.M.; Hunt, A.M.A.; Zachos, M.P.; Gibson, J.A.; Hurwitz, M.E.; Mulks, M.H.; Waters, C.M. Triclosan Is an Aminoglycoside Adjuvant for Eradication of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Minrovic, B.M.; Jung, D.; Melander, R.J.; Melander, C. New Class of Adjuvants Enables Lower Dosing of Colistin Against Acinetobacter baumannii. ACS Infect. Dis. 2018, 4, 1368–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Harris, T.L.; Worthington, R.J.; Hittle, L.E.; Zurawski, D.V.; Ernst, R.K.; Melander, C. Small Molecule Downregulation of PmrAB Reverses Lipid A Modification and Breaks Colistin Resistance. ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hubble, V.B.; Bartholomew, K.R.; Weig, A.W.; Brackett, S.M.; Barlock, S.L.; Mattingly, A.E.; Nemeth, A.M.; Melander, R.J.; Melander, C. Augmenting the Activity of Macrolide Adjuvants against. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 1723–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Martin, S.E.; Melander, R.J.; Brackett, C.M.; Scott, A.J.; Chandler, C.E.; Nguyen, C.M.; Minrovic, B.M.; Harrill, S.E.; Ernst, R.K.; Manoil, C.; et al. Small Molecule Potentiation of Gram-Positive Selective Antibiotics against. ACS Infect. Dis. 2019, 5, 1223–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Marrujo, S.A.; Hubble, V.B.; Yang, J.; Wang, M.; Nemeth, A.M.; Barlock, S.L.; Juarez, D.; Smith, R.D.; Melander, R.J.; Ernst, R.K.; et al. Dimeric 2-aminoimidazoles are highly active adjuvants for gram-positive selective antibiotics against Acinetobacter baumannii. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 253, 115329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wesseling, C.M.J.; Martin, N.I. Synergy by Perturbing the Gram-Negative Outer Membrane: Opening the Door for Gram-Positive Specific Antibiotics. ACS Infect. Dis. 2022, 8, 1731–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Stokes, J.M.; MacNair, C.R.; Ilyas, B.; French, S.; Côté, J.P.; Bouwman, C.; Farha, M.A.; Sieron, A.O.; Whitfield, C.; Coombes, B.K.; et al. Pentamidine sensitizes Gram-negative pathogens to antibiotics and overcomes acquired colistin resistance. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 17028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, Y.; Jia, Y.; Yang, K.; Li, R.; Xiao, X.; Zhu, K.; Wang, Z. Metformin Restores Tetracyclines Susceptibility against Multidrug Resistant Bacteria. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1902227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Brackett, C.M.; Melander, R.J.; An, I.H.; Krishnamurthy, A.; Thompson, R.J.; Cavanagh, J.; Melander, C. Small-Molecule Suppression of Beta-Lactam Resistance in Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 7450–7458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute. M100 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  26. Milton, M.E.; Minrovic, B.M.; Harris, D.L.; Kang, B.; Jung, D.; Lewis, C.P.; Thompson, R.J.; Melander, R.J.; Zeng, D.; Melander, C.; et al. Re-sensitizing Multidrug Resistant Bacteria to Antibiotics by Targeting Bacterial Response Regulators: Characterization and Comparison of Interactions between 2-Aminoimidazoles and the Response Regulators BfmR from Acinetobacter baumannii and QseB from Francisella spp. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2018, 5, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bunders, C.A.; Richards, J.J.; Melander, C. Identification of aryl 2-aminoimidazoles as biofilm inhibitors in Gram-negative bacteria. Bioorg Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 3797–3800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Douraghi, M.; Aris, P.; To, J.; Myers, G.S.A.; Hamidian, M. Two carbapenem-resistant ST1:ST231:KL1:OCL1. JAC Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 3, dlab112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yarlagadda, V.; Medina, R.; Wright, G.D. Venturicidin A, A Membrane-active Natural Product Inhibitor of ATP synthase Potentiates Aminoglycoside Antibiotics. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 8134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hui, Z.; Liu, S.; Cui, R.; Zhou, B.; Hu, C.; Zhang, M.; Deng, Q.; Cheng, S.; Luo, Y.; Chen, H.; et al. A small molecule interacts with pMAC-derived hydroperoxide reductase and enhances the activity of aminoglycosides. J. Antibiot. 2021, 74, 324–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Clifton, L.A.; Skoda, M.W.; Le Brun, A.P.; Ciesielski, F.; Kuzmenko, I.; Holt, S.A.; Lakey, J.H. Effect of divalent cation removal on the structure of gram-negative bacterial outer membrane models. Langmuir 2015, 31, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Barrett, J.F.; Goldschmidt, R.M.; Lawrence, L.E.; Foleno, B.; Chen, R.; Demers, J.P.; Johnson, S.; Kanojia, R.; Fernandez, J.; Bernstein, J.; et al. Antibacterial agents that inhibit two-component signal transduction systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 5317–5322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Walsh, B.J.C.; Wang, J.; Edmonds, K.A.; Palmer, L.D.; Zhang, Y.; Trinidad, J.C.; Skaar, E.P.; Giedroc, D.P. The Response of Acinetobacter baumannii to Hydrogen Sulfide Reveals Two Independent Persulfide-Sensing Systems and a Connection to Biofilm Regulation. mBio 2020, 11, e01254-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dwyer, D.J.; Belenky, P.A.; Yang, J.H.; MacDonald, I.C.; Martell, J.D.; Takahashi, N.; Chan, C.T.; Lobritz, M.A.; Braff, D.; Schwarz, E.G.; et al. Antibiotics induce redox-related physiological alterations as part of their lethality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E2100–E2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lv, B.; Huang, X.; Lijia, C.; Ma, Y.; Bian, M.; Li, Z.; Duan, J.; Zhou, F.; Yang, B.; Qie, X.; et al. Heat shock potentiates aminoglycosides against gram-negative bacteria by enhancing antibiotic uptake, protein aggregation, and ROS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2217254120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, P.; Li, R.Q.; Wang, L.; Yang, W.T.; Zou, Q.H.; Xiao, D. Proteomic Analyses of Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates to Identify Drug Resistant Mechanism. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 625430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Pineau, R.M.; Hanson, S.E.; Lyles, J.T.; Quave, C.L. Growth Inhibitory Activity of Callicarpa americana Leaf Extracts Against Cutibacterium acnes. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antibiotics 12 01563 g001
Figure 1. Initial compounds screened for potentiation of TOB.
Figure 1. Initial compounds screened for potentiation of TOB.
Antibiotics 12 01563 g001
Antibiotics 12 01563 g002
Figure 2. Active compounds from follow-up screen.
Figure 2. Active compounds from follow-up screen.
Antibiotics 12 01563 g002
Table 1. TOB MICs in the presence of compounds 1–5 against AB5075 and AB19606.
Table 1. TOB MICs in the presence of compounds 1–5 against AB5075 and AB19606.
AB5075AB19606
CompoundConcentration (μM)TOB MIC (μg/mL) (Fold-Reduction)Concentration (μM)TOB MIC (μg/mL) (Fold-Reduction)
128 4
1302 (64)301 (4)
23016 (8)301 (4)
31564 (2)300.5 (8)
46032 (4)602 (2)
57.532 (4)152 (2)
Table 2. TOB MICs in the presence of compounds 6–12 against AB5075 and AB19606.
Table 2. TOB MICs in the presence of compounds 6–12 against AB5075 and AB19606.
AB5075AB19606
CompoundConcentration (μM)TOB MIC (μg/mL) (Fold-Reduction)Concentration (μM)TOB MIC (μg/mL) (Fold-Reduction)
128 4
6304 (32)300.5 (8)
7302 (64)150.5 (8)
8604 (32)602 (2)
96016 (8)600.0625 (64)
103032 (4)600.25 (16)
116016 (8)301 (4)
12608 (16)600.5 (8)
Table 3. Additional aminoglycoside MICs in the presence of select 2-AI compounds against AB5075.
Table 3. Additional aminoglycoside MICs in the presence of select 2-AI compounds against AB5075.
CompoundConcentration (μM)STM MIC (μg/mL) (Fold-Reduction)Concentration (μM)KAN MIC (μg/mL) (Fold-Reduction)Concentration (μM)NEO MIC (μg/mL) (Fold-Reduction)Concentration (μM)GEN MIC (μg/mL) (Fold-Reduction)
2048 2048 64 512
130128 (16)152048 (0)1532 (2)1532 (16)
63032 (64)301024 (2)3016 (4)30>512 (0)
715128 (16)7.52048 (0)7.5>64 (0)7.5256 (2)
830512 (4)602048 (0)604 (16)6016 (32)
STM = Streptomycin, KAN = Kanamycin, NEO = Neomycin, GEN = Gentamicin.
Table 4. Additional aminoglycoside MICs in the presence of select 2-AI compounds against AB19606.
Table 4. Additional aminoglycoside MICs in the presence of select 2-AI compounds against AB19606.
CompoundConcentration (μM)STM MIC (μg/mL) (Fold-Reduction)Concentration (μM)KAN MIC (μg/mL) (Fold-Reduction)Concentration (μM)NEO MIC (μg/mL) (Fold-Reduction)Concentration (μM)GEN MIC (μg/mL) (Fold-Reduction)
512 8 8 32
130128 (4)15>8 (0)154 (2)154 (8)
33064 (8)302 (4)301 (8)301 (32)
51564 (8)154 (2)152 (4)152 (16)
63016 (32)301 (8)301 (8)3032 (0)
77.5512 (0)151 (8)152 (4)154 (8)
106016 (32)600.5 (16)600.5 (16)600.25 (128)
302 (4)452 (16)
STM = Streptomycin, KAN = Kanamycin, NEO = Neomycin, GEN = Gentamicin.
Table 5. Tobramycin MICs against K. pneumoniae and Escherichia coli.
Table 5. Tobramycin MICs against K. pneumoniae and Escherichia coli.
StrainTOB MIC (μg/mL)TOB MIC
(μg/mL) + 1 (μM)		TOB MIC
(μg/mL) + 3 (μM)		TOB MIC
(μg/mL) + 5 (μM)		TOB MIC
(μg/mL) + 10 (μM)		TOB MIC
(μg/mL) + 11 (μM)		TOB MIC
(μg/mL) + 12 (μM)
KP170532(15) 16(15) 32(15) 16(60) 16(60) 32(60) 8
KP438161(15) 0.125(15) 0.5(15) 0.125(30) 0.25(60) 0.5(10) 0.5
EC19732(3.75) 32(7.5) 16(7.5) 16(15) 16(60) 16(15) 16
EC1990.5(7.5) 0.5(7.5) 0.5(7.5) 0.5(15) 0.5(60) 0.5(15) 0.5
Concentration of adjuvant (μM) indicated in parentheses.
Table 6. Tobramycin MICs (μg/mL) of serially passaged bacterial populations.
Table 6. Tobramycin MICs (μg/mL) of serially passaged bacterial populations.
AB5075 Passaged in TOB OnlyAB5075 Passaged in TOB + 1 (15 μM)
Day 0128128
Day 21024256
Day 410241024
Day 640961024
Day 840962048
Table 7. Shared genes with mutations following serial passage.
Table 7. Shared genes with mutations following serial passage.
Gene Product (Gene)Locus Tag# of MutationsType of Mutation
Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase subunit F (ahpF)A591_RS08360118 snp; 3 complex
Aldehyde dehydrogenaseA591_RS1610031 snp; 2 complex
Bacteriophage proteinA591_RS1388532 snp; 1 complex
Stress-induced proteinA591_RS202051snp
Replication initiation factor domain-containing proteinA591_RS158501Insertion
Ig-like domain repeat proteinA591_RS195901snp
Hypothetical protein (elongation factor Tu (tuf))A591_RS012801snp
Hypothetical protein (replication protein)A591_RS202501Insertion
Unknown hypothetical proteinA591_RS202451Insertion
Unknown hypothetical proteinA591_RS158451Insertion
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Crotteau, A.N.; Hubble, V.B.; Marrujo, S.A.; Mattingly, A.E.; Melander, R.J.; Melander, C. Sensitization of Gram-Negative Bacteria to Aminoglycosides with 2-Aminoimidazole Adjuvants. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12111563

AMA Style

Crotteau AN, Hubble VB, Marrujo SA, Mattingly AE, Melander RJ, Melander C. Sensitization of Gram-Negative Bacteria to Aminoglycosides with 2-Aminoimidazole Adjuvants. Antibiotics. 2023; 12(11):1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12111563

Chicago/Turabian Style

Crotteau, Ashley N., Veronica B. Hubble, Santiana A. Marrujo, Anne E. Mattingly, Roberta J. Melander, and Christian Melander. 2023. "Sensitization of Gram-Negative Bacteria to Aminoglycosides with 2-Aminoimidazole Adjuvants" Antibiotics 12, no. 11: 1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12111563

APA Style

Crotteau, A. N., Hubble, V. B., Marrujo, S. A., Mattingly, A. E., Melander, R. J., & Melander, C. (2023). Sensitization of Gram-Negative Bacteria to Aminoglycosides with 2-Aminoimidazole Adjuvants. Antibiotics, 12(11), 1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12111563

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop