Next Article in Journal
Relationship between Target Time above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Achievement Rate of Meropenem Using Monte Carlo Simulation and In-Hospital Survival in Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia
Previous Article in Journal
Decline in ESBL Production and Carbapenem Resistance in Urinary Tract Infections among Key Bacterial Species during the COVID-19 Pandemic
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Community Emergence of Cefixime-Resistant Escherichia coli Belonging to ST12 with Chromosomal AmpC Hyperproduction

by
Gloria Zaragoza
1,†,
María Pérez-Vázquez
2,3,†,
Laura Villar-Gómara
4,
Andrea González-Prieto
5,
Jesús Oteo-Iglesias
2,3,* and
Juan-Ignacio Alós
1,*
1
Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, 28905 Madrid, Spain
2
Laboratorio de Resistencia a Antibióticos, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28222 Majadahonda, Spain
3
CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
4
Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS), Plan Nacional frente a la Resistencia a los Antibióticos (PRAN), 28022 Madrid, Spain
5
Laboratorio central BRsalud, Hospital Infanta Sofía, San Sebastián de los Reyes, 28702 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antibiotics 2024, 13(3), 218; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13030218
Submission received: 9 January 2024 / Revised: 21 February 2024 / Accepted: 26 February 2024 / Published: 27 February 2024

Abstract

:
Escherichia coli isolates that are resistant to cefixime and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, but apparently susceptible to cefuroxime, with no ESBL identified, were initially detected in Madrid from urine samples in 2019. Throughout 2020 and 2021, all cases of community UTI by E. coli from six health areas in Madrid were studied. A representative sample of 23 cases was selected for further studies. The broth microdilution method and the agar diffusion method were performed to determine the antibiotic susceptibility. WGS was carried out for phylogeny, resistome and virulome analysis. Community consumption of third-generation oral cephalosporins in Madrid (2017–2021) was analyzed. A total of 582 (1.3%) E. coli isolates had the mentioned resistance profile. The mutation at position –32 (T > A) of the AmpC promoter was found in 21 isolates. No plasmid AmpC- or ESBL-encoding genes were detected. A cluster of 20 ST12 isolates was detected by cgMLST. A 6.2% increase in the consumption of third-generation oral cephalosporins, especially cefixime, was observed in Madrid. Chromosomal AmpC-hyperproducing ST12 E. coli isolates could be implicated in the increase in community UTI cases by cefixime-resistant isolates, which correlates with an increasing trend of cefixime consumption.

1. Introduction

Increasing resistance of Gram-negative bacteria to β-lactam antibiotics currently represents one of the main concerns worldwide. The primary mechanism of resistance is the production of β-lactamase enzymes, which have the ability to hydrolyze β-lactams.
Escherichia coli is an important etiological agent of both human nosocomial and community-acquired infections; in particular, E. coli is the main causative agent of urinary tract infections (UTIs) [1]. The acquisition of antibiotic resistance genes by E. coli makes the treatment of infections caused by these bacteria difficult. For example, extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)-producing E. coli isolates are resistant to many β-lactam antibiotics and usually co-producing mechanisms of resistance to other antibiotics [2].
Antibiotic-resistant E. coli can be selected in the human gut following the consumption of antibiotics and subsequently transmitted through the fecal–oral route. A previous study showed that 60% of community-acquired ESBL E. coli were attributable to human transmission [3].
A large proportion of UTIs are community acquired and are treated on an outpatient basis. Among the outpatient treatment options used are second-generation (cefuroxime) and third-generation (cefixime, cefpodoxime) oral cephalosporins.
Although ESBL are the most important oxyiminocephalosporin resistance mechanisms in E. coli, this resistance may also be mediated by AmpC β-lactamases [4]. Despite having been referenced under a different name in the 1940s, the first enzyme reported inactivating penicillin in E. coli was indeed an AmpC, which was before penicillin had been introduced in clinical use [5]. E. coli typically produce a class 1 cephalosporinase, encoded by the ampC gene, which is chromosomally located (c-AmpC). The term AmpC defines a class of enzymes that belong to the molecular class C according to Ambler’s structural classification of β-lactamases.
The expression of c-ampC in wild type E. coli isolates is low and not enough to confer clinically relevant resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics. Many mutations, insertions and gene duplication events have been shown to cause c-ampC hyperexpression, and this leads to varying spectra of β-lactam resistance dependent on the actual amount of AmpC produced. c-AmpC hyperproduction was first seen in E. coli from human clinical samples in 1979 and, for a period before the emergence of plasmid-mediated ESBLs, c-AmpC hyperproduction was the dominant mechanism of third-generation cephalosporin resistance in E. coli from humans [6]; however, this is no longer the case.
The AmpC phenotype may also result from acquisition of an AmpC gene encoded by a transferable plasmid (p-AmpC) [6]. The optimal treatment of infections caused by β-lactamase AmpC-producing bacteria depends on the early detection capacity of these enzymes.
In general, AmpCs exhibit a broad substrate specificity including penicillins (e.g., penicillin G; aminopenicillins such as amoxicillin and ampicillin; carboxypenicillins such as carbenicillin and ticarcillin; ureidopenicillin such as piperacillin), narrow-spectrum cephalosporins (e.g., cefazolin, and cefuroxime), oxyiminocephalosporins (e.g., cefotaxime, cefpodoxime, ceftazidime and ceftriaxone), cephamycins (e.g., cefoxitin and cefotetan) and aztreonam (variable), and their expression can confer resistance to all these compounds. The hydrolysis rate for fourth-generation cephalosporins (e.g., cefepime and cefpirome) is usually low, and that for carbapenems is very low, so that susceptibility to these drugs is usually maintained. Concerning inhibitors, AmpCs are usually resistant to β-lactam-based inhibitors (e.g., clavulanate, sulbactam and tazobactam) while being inhibited by the new non-β-lactam-based inhibitors (e.g., diazabicyclo-octanes, such as avibactam and relebactam, and boronates, such as vaborbactam) [7].
ESBL-producing strains usually have cefoxitin MIC ≤ 8 mg/L and elevated MIC to 3rd- or 4th-generation cephalosporins that recover with clavulanic acid, whereas AmpC-producing strains usually have cefoxitin MIC > 8 mg/L and elevated MICs to 3rd-generation cephalosporins (usually maintaining susceptibility to cefepime) whose activity does not recover with clavulanic acid.
In 2019, non-ESBL-producing E. coli isolates resistant to cefixime (MIC > 1 mg/L) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (MIC > 32/2 mg/L), and mostly with cefoxitin MIC ≤ 8 mg/L, began to be detected from urine samples in Madrid (Spain). This atypical profile caught our attention and, suspecting the emergence of a possible new plasmid AmpC production or unusual c-AmpC hyperproduction, we designed the present study.
The aim of this study was to determine the phenotypic and genotypic characterization, by complete genomic sequencing, of the community emergence of E. coli isolates with the aforementioned profile.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Patients and Isolates

Throughout the study period, 44,363 urine E. coli isolates from patients with community-acquired UTI were studied by the microbiology laboratories of the six health areas participating. Out of these isolates, 582 (1.3%) were resistant to cefixime and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid without ESBL production, which is a profile compatible with AmpC production; however, they showed cefoxitin MIC ≤ 8 mg/L or 16 mg/L.
The 23 representative isolates that were selected for further study were mainly from women (82.6%) between 18 and 65 years old (73.9%), and they were from all six participating health areas (range of isolates per health area: 2–9).
The prevalence of AmpC production in E. coli remains low in comparison with ESBLs. A study carried out with E. coli isolates resistant to amoxicillin/clavunanic acid showed an overall AmpC prevalence of 3.5% with approximately half of them being c-AmpC and the other half being p-AmpC [8]. The prevalence of c-AmpC in E. coli was 0.28% and 1.05% in other studies from Spain and Belgium, respectively [9,10]. Nonetheless, it is noteworthy to consider that the prevalence of 1.3% described in our study only refers to a specific profile of the overproducing c-AmpC with cefoxitin MIC ≤ 16 mg/L, so it is most likely undervalued.

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis

The genomic assemblies of all 23 representative isolates, analyzed using the gene-to-gene approach and the allelic distance of cgMLST, are reflected in a minimum spanning tree (Figure 1). Twenty isolates were grouped into a main cluster belonging to ST12 according to the University of Warwick scheme. The average allelic distances between pairs of isolates in this cluster was 36 alleles (range 11–115). The other three isolates belonged to different MLSTs, according to the Warwick ST58, ST73 and ST162 (showing mean distances of 2405, 1940 and 2408 with the largest cluster, respectively).
This study highlights the presence of genetically grouped ST12 isolates with the same resistance profile in community urinary tract infections from different areas of Madrid. Although ST12 has not been a particularly prevalent ST in E. coli, it is recognized as a cause of extraintestinal infections [11,12] and belongs to the usually virulent B2 phylogroup [12]. In a study carried out in Spain and France in 2016, 4% of 196 isolates causing urinary tract and other extraintestinal infections belonged to ST12 [11]. In a recent study, ST12 was isolated in 4.1% of UTI-causing strains in nursing homes, and it was significantly more frequent in recurrent UTI (9.3%) than in non-recurrent UTI (0%) [13]. Most of the information on the population structure of E. coli in Spain refers to multidrug-resistant isolates; ST131 has usually predominated in these populations, although in general, a great genetic diversity has been detected [12,14].
In contrast, we have not found reports of ST12 isolates with c-AmpC overproduction. In general, the E. coli population is genetically very diverse [15], and community dissemination of specific ExPEC clones has been rare and mainly associated with the successful B2/ST131 clone [16]. Historically, a high diversity of STs has been described in c-AmpC overproducers [10,17], which contrast with our results. In a study performed in Barcelona (Spain) on 240 E. coli with acquired or overproduced blaAmpC, none belonged to ST12 [9].

2.3. Resistome

Complete genomic sequencing analysis ruled out the presence of acquired genes encoding ESBL or AmpC-type plasmid β-lactamases in the 23 representative isolates studied.
Analysis of the c-AmpC gene promoter of E. coli showed the change at position −32 (T > A), located in box −35 (TTGACA), in 21 of the 23 studied isolates; all 20 ST12 isolates showed this modification. In the two remaining isolates (ST58 and ST162), two mutations were detected in the c-AmpC promoter: one at position −18 (G > A), located between boxes −35 (TTGACA) and −10 (TACAAT), and another at position −42 (C > T).
Previous analysis of the promoter regions of c-AmpC E. coli genes confirmed the presence of two conserved regions, the −35 box and the −10 box, that are crucial for fixation of the σ subunit of RNA polymerase. The variation in these boxes, or in the distance between them, can condition the expression of the c-AmpC gene [18]. The −32 (T > A) modification has been previously described as one of the main modifications responsible for β-lactam resistance in E. coli by increasing AmpC transcription [18].
In addition, the resistome study in these isolates also demonstrated the presence of the genes encoding the β-lactamases TEM-1 (11/23, 47.8%), TEM-30 and TEM-34 (IRTs, one each, 8.7%). Other antibiotics resistance genes detected were tetB (tetracycline resistance; 14/23, 60.9%), catB (chloramphenicol resistance; 1/23, 8.7%), sul1 and sul2 (sulfonamides resistance; 1/23, 8.7% of each) and dfrA12 (trimethoprim resistance; 1/23, 8.7%). Four (17.4%) isolates presented gyrA mutations related to resistance to quinolones.

2.4. Virulence Factors

Analysis of virulence genes showed a homogeneous profile in the 20 ST12 isolates including the adhesin coding genes fimH, papC and papA-F43 (20/20, 100%), focC (19/20, 95%) and sfaD (18/20, 90%); however, another frequent adhesin gene in E. coli such as afa was not detected. ST12 isolates also had the toxin-encoding genes vat, cnf1 and hlyA (100%) as well as the siderophore gene iroN (19/20, 95%). Other relevant virulence genes in E. coli, such as the pic and sat toxin genes, the siderophore gene iutA and the invasive protein gene ibeA, were not detected in the ST12 isolates of this study. All but one of the cefixime-resistant ST12 isolates had the capsular gene kpsMIII_K96.
In this study, ST12/c-AmpC isolates show a high load of adhesin-coding genes that may favor adhesion to the urothelium. While the fimH gene, encoding type 1 fimbriae, is usually present in susceptible and antibiotic-resistant isolates of E. coli [11,12], the papA, papC, focC and sfaD genes are not widely distributed. In a study involving 168 Spanish isolates susceptible (n = 56) and resistant (n = 112) to amoxicillin/clavulanate, these genes were generally detected in less than 50% of the isolates, and they were more frequent in susceptible strains (35.7%, 39.3%, 48.2% and 17.9%) than in resistant strains [12].
The presence of the cnf1 gene, encoding cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1, is also noteworthy, since it is an important virulence factor associated with some pathogenic strains of E. coli causing urinary tract infection and meningitis [19,20].
The presence of iroN, and other genes encoding siderophores, is one of the bacterial strategies to obtain iron from infected sites with very low iron availability [21].
In a recent study with Spanish and French E. coli isolates causing UTI and other extraintestinal infections, a strong correlation was observed between STs and virulence factors-encoding genes with a higher mean of virulence gene score observed in isolates belonging to ST12 and others STs belonging to the B2 phylogenetic group [11].
Contrasting with a virulent profile, as many isolates accumulated virulence factors, the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance was limited with no evidence of a multidrug-resistant emerging lineage, which was an occurrence in the ST141 clonal group [22].

2.5. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

In Microscan NM57 panels, all 23 isolates were resistant to cefixime (MIC > 1 mg/L) and amoxicillin–clavulanate (MIC > 32/2 mg/L). Susceptibility results to other β-lactam antibiotics included MIC ≤ 8 mg/L (susceptible or susceptible with increased exposure; 19/23 isolates) and MIC > 8 mg/L (resistant; 4/23) for cefuroxime; MIC ≤ 8 mg/L (19/23) and MIC = 16 mg/L (4/23) for cefoxitin; and MIC ≤ 1 mg/L (23/23; susceptible) for cefotaxime and ceftazidime.
The disk-diffusion method and the results of concentration gradient strips revealed resistance to cefixime (MIC: 16–64 mg/L; zone diameters: 6–12 mm), cefpodoxime (MIC: 8–32 mg/L; zone diameters: 6–13 mm), amoxicillin clavulanate (MIC > 256/2 mg/L; zone diameters: 6–15 mm) and cefuroxime (MIC: 16–64 mg/L; zone diameters: 11–18 mm). Cefoxitin MICs were between 16 and 64 mg/L with zone diameters of 6–18 mm. Both cefotaxime and ceftazidime MIC by concentration gradient strips were 1 mg/L in all 23 isolates.
Cefotaxime and ceftazidime activity did not increase with clavulanic acid (less than 5 mm difference in the inhibition zone diameter), ruling out ESBL production. However, there was a difference in inhibition zone diameter greater than 5 mm between ceftazidime, cefotaxime and cefixime with and without cloxacillin, indicating a possible production of AmpC.
In addition, most strains with this resistance phenotype, and all ST12 isolates, were susceptible to other non-β-lactam antibiotics (Table 1).
The differences in susceptibility to some β-lactam antibiotics depending on the method used are of concern. According to the phenotypic detection of c-AmpC and susceptibility results by concentration gradient strips and disk diffusion, we consider that there could be an underdetection of these strains in daily practice in microbiology laboratories using commercial Microscan microdilution panels. Usually, c-AmpC overproduction is suspected by the decrease in cefoxitin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and third-generation cephalosporins susceptibility, particularly ceftazidime; and by the lack of recovery of ceftazidime activity in the presence of clavulanic acid [23]. In this case, reduction in susceptibility to cefoxitin, cefotaxime or ceftazidime was not observed by microdilution panels, but it was detected by concentration gradient strips.
Furthermore, in all isolates, resistance to cefuroxime was detected by the disk-diffusion method and concentration gradient strips, unlike the results obtained by Microscan microdilution panels in which 83% of the isolates were susceptible to this antibiotic. Cefuroxime is one of the outpatient treatment alternatives for UTI, which is why we should be especially careful with strains such as those detected in this study, which we believe should be reported as cefuroxime resistant. The marked susceptibility to the rest of the non-β-lactam antibiotics studied is noteworthy. Our most frequent lineage, ST12, has been previously associated with a low percentage of antibiotic multidrug resistance [11,24] which is consistent with our study, and it facilitates the outpatient treatment of infections caused by it.
However, and as generally considered, the emergence of community E. coli isolates resistant to cefixime is of concern, since cefixime is one of the few alternatives for the outpatient oral treatment of infections caused by multi-resistant strains.

2.6. Consumption of Cefixime and Other Third-Generation Oral Cephalosporins

The consumption of third-generation oral cephalosporins and, specifically, of cefixime in Madrid and Spain, is detailed in Table 2.
The use of 3rd generation oral cephalosporins decreased in Spain from 0.5453513 DIDs in 2017 to 0.5210577 in 2021 (−4.5% decrease; r2 = 0.26; p = 0.37) but increased in Madrid in the same period from 0.5925330 to 0.6292428 (6.2% increase; r2 = 0.61; p = 0.12). Cefixime consumption increased in Spain from 0.3008929 DID in 2017 to 0.3244793 DID in 2021 (7.8% increase; r2 = 0.04; p = 0.72), but the only statistically significant trend observed was the increase in the cefixime consumption in Madrid from 0.3589150 DID in 2017 to 0.4405656 DID in 2021 (22.7% increase; r2 = 0.95; p = 0.004).
The increase in the consumption of oral cephalosporins detected in this study, mainly cefixime and principally in Madrid, coincided with the emergence and spread of cefixime resistant non-ESBL E. coli isolates in UTI in this autonomous community. According to the preliminary molecular results detected in a small but representative group of isolates, which needs to be confirmed with subsequent studies, the cefixime consumption increase could be also related to the emergence of c-AmpC ST12 isolates in the community-acquired UTIs.
In a study in E. coli from dairy farms, an association between amoxicillin/clavulanate use and the risk of finding c-AmpC hyperproducers was found [25].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Isolates

From January 2020 to December 2021, 44,363 urine E. coli isolates producing community-acquired UTI from six health areas in the Community of Madrid (6,662,000 inhabitants) were studied for antibiotic susceptibility. Of them, 582 cases were resistant to cefixime and amoxicillin/clavulanate, had cefoxitin MIC ≤ 16 mg/L and did not produce ESBL; a representative sample of isolates from 23 different patients was selected for further phenotypic and genotypic analysis according to the following criteria: a single isolate per patient was included; at least two isolates per health area, one for each year of the study (2020–2021) were selected; and the number of isolates included per health area was proportional to the number of cases with the aforementioned profile that every area had (range of isolates per area: 2–9).
The E. coli identification was confirmed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MALDI Biotyper; Bruker Daltonics, Bemen, Germany)

3.2. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Primary susceptibility studies were routinely performed in clinical laboratories by broth microdilution by a semi-automated method (WalkAway, Beckman Coulter), mainly using Microscan NM57 panels, although cefoxitin susceptibility obtained with NUC95 and EN52 panels was also considered. EUCAST v12.0 clinical breakpoints and guidelines for Enterobacterales were used to interpret the data (http://www.eucast.org, accessed on 15 July 2023).
NM57 panels include cefotaxime/clavulanic acid and ceftazidime/clavulanic acid (both from 0.25/4 to 4/4 mg/L). These data allow interpreting a strain as ESBL positive if ≥8-fold reduction is observed in the MIC of any of the cephalosporins combined with clavulanic acid compared with the MIC of the cephalosporin alone; otherwise, the result is interpreted as negative.
In the representative sample of 23 isolates, the detection of AmpC β-lactamases was performed with cefotaxime, ceftazidime and cefixime disks with and without cloxacillin, and ESBL with cefotaxime and ceftazidime discs with and without clavulanic acid.
In addition, susceptibility to different β-lactams (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefuroxime, cefoxitin, cefixime and cefpodoxime) was determined by disk diffusion and concentration gradient strips methods and then interpreted according to EUCAST v12.0 breakpoints. For cefoxitin MIC, an EUCAST cut-off value of >8 mg/L was used as a highly sensitive indicator of AmpC-producing Enterobacterales.

3.3. Genomic Library Preparation, Sequence Analysis and Phylogenetic Analysis

All the 23 E. coli isolates were cultured on MacConkey agar (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, MD, USA) and incubated overnight at 37 °C. DNA was extracted using the QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
All strains were subjected to WGS using the Illumina NextSeq 500 sequencer system (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). A genomic DNA paired-end library was generated using the Nextera XT DNA sample preparation kit (Illumina Inc.). The quality of short reads was assessed using FASTQC, and they were assembled into contigs with Unicycler 0.4.8 [26]. The quality of the assembly was assessed with QUAST (http://quast.bioinf.spbau.ru/, accessed on 3 December 2022). Prokka v1.14-beta [27] was used for automatic de novo assembly annotation. Raw sequence data were submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive (PRJEB61431).
A core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) with 2528 genes provided by SeqSphere + 3.5.0 (Ridom, Münster, Germany) was applied to compare isolates.
Acquired antimicrobial resistance genes and chromosomal point mutations were analyzed using ResFindertool (CGE server: https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk, accessed on 5 September 2023) with an ID threshold of 98%, except for β-lactamase variants, which were determined with a 100% identity.
In all 23 E. coli isolates, the presence of virulence-associated genes was identified using VirulenceFindertool (CGE server: https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk, accessed on 5 September 2023) with an ID threshold of 90%.

3.4. Antibiotic Consumption

The total consumption (hospital and community) of oral third-generation cephalosporins (cefixime, cefpodoxime, cefditoren and ceftibuten) in Madrid and Spain was determined according to the public and private health prescriptions for the period 2017–2021. Data were provided by the Spanish National Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance (PRAN) and coordinated by the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS, Ministry of Health). They were obtained from the database of retail pharmacy sales from National Health System prescriptions and market research companies, covering nearly 100% of the Spanish population and both public and private prescriptions [28].
The information was tabulated, and the number of units was converted into defined daily doses (DDD) of active drug ingredients according to WHO methodology [28]. The number of DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day (DIDs) was calculated for each active drug ingredient.
Trends in antibiotic consumption were examined by regression model analysis using GraphPad Prism software v.9.1 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

4. Conclusions

An increase in cefixime resistance was detected in non-ESBL-producing urine E. coli isolates from Madrid. The preliminary molecular results obtained in a representative sample of isolates suggested that this increase could be at least partially related to the dispersion of overproducing c-AmpC ST12 isolates.
Cefixime consumption significantly increased in Madrid from 2017 to 2021, which is a factor that could have exerted selective pressure for the selection of cefixime-resistant E. coli and, specifically, of ST12 resistant isolates.
The misidentification of cefoxitin susceptibility in theses isolates by some frequently used commercial panels, together with the slight affectation of cefotaxime and ceftazidime activity (remaining as susceptible according to EUCAST criteria), could lead to the under-diagnosis of these isolates.
E. coli is a good sentinel microorganism to detect evolutionary trends of antibiotic resistance in community-acquired infections. The design of comprehensive surveillance systems that include whole genome sequencing is necessary to confirm and trace the evolution of the trends such as those detected in this study.

Author Contributions

J.-I.A. and J.O.-I. conceived, designed and coordinated the study. G.Z. and A.G.-P. collected isolates. L.V.-G. contributed and analyzed the consumption of antibiotics. G.Z. and M.P.-V. performed the experiments. G.Z., M.P.-V., J.O.-I. and J.-I.A. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by CIBER—Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CB21/13/00095; CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación and Unión Europea–NextGenerationEU. Personalized and precision medicine grant from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (MePRAM Project, PMP22/00092), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación and Unión Europea–NextGenerationEU, supported also this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in the European Nucleotide Archive (PRJEB61431).

Acknowledgments

We thank the Genomics Unit of the Centro Nacional de Microbiología for performing the DNA sequencing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lee, D.S.; Lee, S.J.; Choe, H.S. Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infection by Escherichia coli in the Era of Antibiotic Resistance. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 7656752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bezabih, Y.M.; Sabiiti, W.; Alamneh, E.; Bezabih, A.; Peterson, G.M.; Bezabhe, W.M.; Roujeinikova, A. The global prevalence and trend of human intestinal carriage of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in the community. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 76, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mughini-Gras, L.; Dorado-García, A.; Van Duijkeren, E.; Van Den Bunt, G.; Dierikx, C.M.; Bonten, M.J.M.; Bootsma, M.C.J.; Schmitt, H.; Hald, T.; Evers, E.G.; et al. Attributable sources of community-acquired carriage of Escherichia coli containing β-lactam antibiotic resistance genes: A population-based modelling study. Lancet Planet. Health 2019, 3, e357–e369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Livermore, D.M. Defining an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008, 14 (Suppl. S1), 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Abraham, E.P.; Chain, E. An enzyme from bacteria able to destroy penicillin. Nature 1940, 146, 837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jacoby, G.A. AmpC β-lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 161–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Meini, S.; Tascini, C.; Cei, M.; Sozio, E.; Rossolini, G.M. AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: What a clinician should know. Infection 2019, 47, 363–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ortega, A.; Oteo, J.; Aranzamendi-Zaldumbide, M.; Bartolomé, R.M.; Bou, G.; Cercenado, E.; Conejo, M.C.; González-López, J.J.; Marín, M.; Martínez-Martínez, L.; et al. Spanish Multicenter Study of the Epidemiology and Mechanisms of Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Resistance in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 3576–3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alonso, N.; Miró, E.; Pascual, V.; Rivera, A.; Simó, M.; Garcia, M.C.; Xercavins, M.; Morera, M.A.; Espejo, E.; Gurguí, M.; et al. Molecular characterisation of acquired and overproduced chromosomal blaAmpC in Escherichia coli clinical isolates. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2016, 47, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bogaerts, P.; Rodriguez-Villalobos, H.; Bauraing, C.; Deplano, A.; Laurent, C.; Berhin, C.; Struelens, M.J.; Glupczynski, Y. Molecular characterization of AmpC-producing Escherichia coli clinical isolates recovered at two Belgian hospitals. Pathol. Biol. 2010, 58, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Flament-Simon, S.-C.; Nicolas-Chanoine, M.-H.; García, V.; Duprilot, M.; Mayer, N.; Alonso, M.P.; García-Meniño, I.; Blanco, J.E.; Blanco, M.; Blanco, J. Clonal Structure, Virulence Factor-encoding Genes and Antibiotic Resistance of Escherichia coli, Causing Urinary Tract Infections and Other Extraintestinal Infections in Humans in Spain and France during 2016. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oteo, J.; González-López, J.J.; Ortega, A.; Quintero-Zárate, J.N.; Bou, G.; Cercenado, E.; Conejo, M.C.; Martínez-Martínez, L.; Navarro, F.; Oliver, A.; et al. Inhibitor-Resistant TEM- and OXA-1-Producing Escherichia coli Isolates Resistant to Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Are More Clonal and Possess Lower Virulence Gene Content than Susceptible Clinical Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3874–3881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hidad, S.; van der Putten, B.; van Houdt, R.; Schneeberger, C.; Kuil, S.D. Recurrent E. coli Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Homes: Insight in Sequence Types and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ortega, A.; Sáez, D.; Bautista, V.; Fernández-Romero, S.; Lara, N.; Aracil, B.; Perez-Vazquez, M.; Campos, J.; Oteo, J. Carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli is becoming more prevalent in Spain mainly because of the polyclonal dissemination of OXA-48. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 2131–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. González-González, A.; Sánchez-Reyes, L.L.; Sapien, G.D.; Eguiarte, L.E.; Souza, V. Hierarchical clustering of genetic diversity associated to different levels of mutation and recombination in Escherichia coli: A study based on Mexican isolates. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2013, 13, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nicolas-Chanoine, M.H.; Bertrand, X.; Madec, J.Y. Escherichia coli ST131, an intriguing clonal group. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27, 543–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Shayan, S.; Bokaeian, M.; Shahraki, S. Prevalence and molecular characterization of AmpC-producing clinical isolates of Escherichia coli from southeastern Iran. Microb. Drug Resist. 2014, 20, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Caroff, N.; Espaze, E.; Gautreau, D.; Richet, H.; Reynaud, A. Analysis of the effects of -42 and -32 ampC promoter mutations in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli hyperproducing AmpC. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2000, 45, 783–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Carlini, F.; Maroccia, Z.; Fiorentini, C.; Travaglione, S.; Fabbri, A. Effects of the Escherichia coli Bacterial Toxin Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factor 1 on Different Human and Animal Cells: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wang, M.-H.; Kim, K.S. Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factor 1 Contributes to Escherichia coli Meningitis. Toxins 2013, 5, 2270–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Sarowska, J.; Futoma-Koloch, B.; Jama-Kmiecik, A.; Frej-Madrzak, M.; Ksiazczyk, M.; Bugla-Ploskonska, G.; Choroszy-Krol, I. Virulence factors, prevalence and potential transmission of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from different sources: Recent reports. Gut Pathog. 2019, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Emery, A.; Hocquet, D.; Bonnet, R.; Bertrand, X. Genotypic Characteristics and Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli ST141 Clonal Group. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Corvec, S.; Prodhomme, A.; Giraudeau, C.; Dauvergne, S.; Reynaud, A.; Caroff, N. Most Escherichia coli strains overproducing chromosomal AmpC beta-lactamase belong to phylogenetic group A. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007, 60, 872–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nicolas-Chanoine, M.-H.; Blanco, J.; Leflon-Guibout, V.; Demarty, R.; Alonso, M.P.; Caniça, M.M.; Park, Y.-J.; Lavigne, J.-P.; Pitout, J.; Johnson, J.R. Intercontinental emergence of Escherichia coli clone O25:H4-ST131 producing CTX-M-15. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008, 61, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Alzayn, M.; Findlay, J.; Schubert, H.; Mounsey, O.; Gould, V.C.; Heesom, K.J.; Turner, K.M.; Barrett, D.C.; Reyher, K.K.; Avison, M.B. Characterization of AmpC-hyperproducing Escherichia coli from humans and dairy farms collected in parallel in the same geographical region. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 2471–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wick, R.R.; Judd, L.M.; Gorrie, C.L.; Holt, K.E. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017, 13, e1005595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid Prokaryotic Genome Annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Guidelines for ATC. Classification and DDD Assignment. 2023. Available online: https://www.whocc.no/filearchive/publications/2023_guidelines_web.pdf (accessed on 8 July 2023).
Figure 1. Population structure of the 23 representative cefixime-resistant Escherichia coli isolates studied. Distances shown in minimum-spanning tree are based on cgMLST of 2515 genes using the parameter ‘pairwise ignoring missing values.’ Colors in each circle indicate sequence type (ST) and the name as well as the health area of isolation. A red oval represents the ST12 cluster. HIL: health area of H. Infanta Leonor. HSUR: health area of H. del Sureste. HIC: health area of H. Infanta Cristina. HIS: health area of H. Infanta Sofía. HH: health area of H. de Henares. HUG: health area of H. Universitario Getafe.
Figure 1. Population structure of the 23 representative cefixime-resistant Escherichia coli isolates studied. Distances shown in minimum-spanning tree are based on cgMLST of 2515 genes using the parameter ‘pairwise ignoring missing values.’ Colors in each circle indicate sequence type (ST) and the name as well as the health area of isolation. A red oval represents the ST12 cluster. HIL: health area of H. Infanta Leonor. HSUR: health area of H. del Sureste. HIC: health area of H. Infanta Cristina. HIS: health area of H. Infanta Sofía. HH: health area of H. de Henares. HUG: health area of H. Universitario Getafe.
Antibiotics 13 00218 g001
Table 1. Antibiotic susceptibility to non-β-lactam antibiotics according to EUCAST 2022 of the 23 representative isolates studied.
Table 1. Antibiotic susceptibility to non-β-lactam antibiotics according to EUCAST 2022 of the 23 representative isolates studied.
Non-β-Lactam AntibioticsSusceptible (%)Resistant (%)
Ciprofloxacin22 (95.7)1 (4.3)
Fosfomycin23 (100)0
Gentamicin23 (100)0
Tobramycin23 (100)0
Amikacin23 (100)0
Trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole22 (95.7)1 (4.3)
Table 2. Total consumption of oral third-generation cephalosporins (cefixime, ceftibuten, cefditoren and cefpodoxime) and cefixime specifically in Spain and Madrid.
Table 2. Total consumption of oral third-generation cephalosporins (cefixime, ceftibuten, cefditoren and cefpodoxime) and cefixime specifically in Spain and Madrid.
YearOral 3rd Cephalosporins Spain *Oral 3rd Cephalosporins Madrid *Cefixime Spain *Cefixime Madrid *
20170.54535130.59253300.30089290.3589150
20180.56723850.61848760.31696290.3809220
20190.58960150.63720550.33277730.3975886
20200.50418600.63652550.29294490.4044176
20210.52105770.62924280.32447930.4405656
r2/p **0.26/0370.61/0.120.04/0.720.95/0.004 ***
* Expressed in daily defined doses per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID). ** By simple linear regression model. *** Statistically significant trend.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zaragoza, G.; Pérez-Vázquez, M.; Villar-Gómara, L.; González-Prieto, A.; Oteo-Iglesias, J.; Alós, J.-I. Community Emergence of Cefixime-Resistant Escherichia coli Belonging to ST12 with Chromosomal AmpC Hyperproduction. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13030218

AMA Style

Zaragoza G, Pérez-Vázquez M, Villar-Gómara L, González-Prieto A, Oteo-Iglesias J, Alós J-I. Community Emergence of Cefixime-Resistant Escherichia coli Belonging to ST12 with Chromosomal AmpC Hyperproduction. Antibiotics. 2024; 13(3):218. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13030218

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zaragoza, Gloria, María Pérez-Vázquez, Laura Villar-Gómara, Andrea González-Prieto, Jesús Oteo-Iglesias, and Juan-Ignacio Alós. 2024. "Community Emergence of Cefixime-Resistant Escherichia coli Belonging to ST12 with Chromosomal AmpC Hyperproduction" Antibiotics 13, no. 3: 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13030218

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop