Next Article in Journal
Genomic Characterization of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacter hormaechei, Serratia marcescens, Citrobacter freundii, Providencia stuartii, and Morganella morganii Clinical Isolates from Bulgaria
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Cefiderocol in Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Central Nervous System Infections: Real Life Experience and State-of-the-Art
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 13
Issue 5
10.3390/antibiotics13050456
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dissemination of Ceftriaxone-Resistant Salmonella Enteritidis Harboring Plasmids Encoding blaCTX-M-55 or blaCTX-M-14 Gene in China

by
Siyuan Yang
1,2,3,†,
Jianzhong Fan
4,†,
Lifei Yu
1,2,3,5,
Jintao He
1,2,3,
Linghong Zhang
1,2,3,
Yunsong Yu
1,2,3,* and
Xiaoting Hua
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Infectious Diseases, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China
2
Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology and Bioinformatics of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310016, China
3
Regional Medical Center for National Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China
4
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou 310006, China
5
Department of Infectious Diseases, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou 310006, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antibiotics 2024, 13(5), 456; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13050456
Submission received: 2 April 2024 / Revised: 30 April 2024 / Accepted: 13 May 2024 / Published: 16 May 2024
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Salmonella Enteritidis was the primary foodborne pathogen responsible for acute gastroenteritis. The growing ceftriaxone resistance poses a significant threat to public health. Infection with S. Enteritidis has emerged as a major public health concern, particularly in developing countries. However, research on ceftriaxone-resistant S. Enteritidis (CRO-RSE) remains limited, particularly concerning its resistance mechanism, plasmid structure, and transmission characteristics. This study aims to address these gaps comprehensively. We collected 235 S. Enteritidis isolates from Hangzhou First People’s Hospital between 2010 and 2020. Among these, 8.51% (20/235) exhibited resistance to ceftriaxone. Whole-genome analysis revealed that 20 CRO-RSE isolates harbored blaCTX-M-55 or blaCTX-M-14 on the plasmid. Moreover, the dissemination of the blaCTX-M-type gene was associated with IS26 and ISEcp1. Plasmid fusion entailing the integration of the p1 plasmid with antibiotic resistance genes and the p2 (pSEV) virulence plasmid was observed in certain CRO-RSE. Additionally, the structural analysis of the plasmids unveiled two types carrying the blaCTX-M-type gene: type A with multiple replicons and type B with IncI1 (Alpha) replicon. Type B plasmids exhibited superior adaptability and stability compared to type A plasmids within Enterobacteriaceae. Interestingly, although the type B (S808-p1) plasmid displayed the potential to spread to Acinetobacter baumannii, it failed to maintain stability in this species.

1. Introduction

Salmonella Enteritidis can contaminate eggs leading to asymptomatic infections in birds [1], which subsequently spread to humans, posing a significant threat to global health [2]. Salmonella primarily infects humans via the intestinal route and can manifest in a variety of diseases, with acute gastroenteritis being the most prevalent. This can result in either mild or fulminant diarrhea [3], often accompanied by low-grade fever, nausea, and vomiting. Presently, the Salmonella genus comprises two species: S. bongori and S. enterica. S. enterica is further categorized into six subspecies: enterica I, salamae II, arizone IIIa, diarizone IIIb, houtenae IV, and indica VI [4]. S. enterica I is predominantly responsible for human infections [5]. According to serotyping, S. enterica I can be further subdivided into S. Typhimurium, S. Paratyphi, S. Enteritidis, and so on. Among these, S. Enteritidis is a notable non-typhoid Salmonella strain capable of causing foodborne illnesses with a significant global impact on human health that cannot be overlooked [6].
Ceftriaxone, a vital antibiotic, is utilized in the treatment of S. Enteritidis infections. Resistance to ceftriaxone typically arises from the production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), which possess the ability to hydrolyze expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, such as cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, and cefepime, as well as monobactams like aztreonam [7]. Historically, the predominant families of ESBLs were the TEM and SHV enzymes. However, since the early 2000s, CTX-M enzymes have emerged as the most commonly encountered ESBLs [8]. CTX-M enzymes are classified as class A ESBLs and encompass multiple variants that currently dominate ESBL prevalence in clinical and community settings [9]. According to the annual surveillance data from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (http://www.chinets.com/Data/AntibioticDrugFast, accessed on 14 March 2023 and 14 March 2024), 380 and 503 strains of S. Enteritidis exhibited resistance to ceftriaxone, accounting for 12.4% and 20.7% of resistance in 2022 and 2023, respectively. These data suggest a notable increase in ceftriaxone resistance within S. Enteritidis, a development that urgently calls for attention.
Plasmids serve as crucial vectors for the transmission of ESBLs, especially conjugable plasmids, which play a pivotal role in ESBL dissemination. Plasmids harboring ESBLs often contain numerous mobile genetic elements, such as ISEcp1, ISCr1, and IS26, which are associated with the transfer and transmission of ESBLs [10]. For instance, IS26 facilitates the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) through the conservative reaction and by forming translocatable units (TUs) [11]. Moreover, IS26 can be inserted upstream of a resistance gene, creating hybrid promoters that enhance the expression of resistance genes. Previous studies have identified that IS26 was involved in forming the promoter responsible for blaBES-1 expression as observed through sequence analysis of the IncP6-type plasmid (12,957 bp) in Serratia marcescens [12].
As a significant foodborne pathogen, S. Enteritidis contributes to ceftriaxone resistance. The emergence of ceftriaxone-resistant strains not only poses a threat to global public health and safety but also presents new therapeutic challenges. Therefore, understanding the related resistance mechanisms and transmission characteristics is paramount for public health. In this study, we elucidated the ceftriaxone resistance mechanism, plasmid characteristics, and plasmid transmission traits of ceftriaxone-resistant S. Enteritidis (CRO-RSE) isolated from Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang Province, from 2010 to 2020. We employed scientific research methods, including plasmid gene analysis, antibiotic sensitivity testing, conjugation experiments, growth curve analysis, and plasmid stability assessment. These findings provide a crucial research foundation for the surveillance and control of CRO-RSE.

2. Results

2.1. Clinical Information and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

A total of 235 isolates of S. Enteritidis were obtained from Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, China, between 2010 and 2020. The majority of the strains were isolated from the Infectious Disease Department (79/235), with the remaining strains originating from the Intestinal Diseases Department (71/235), Pediatric Department (69/235), and other departments (16/235). The age distribution of these strains ranged from 0 to 88 years, predominantly from adults (117/235), followed by children (60/235), the elderly (40/235), and infants (18/235). Infants were defined as younger than 2 years old, children as 2–15 years old, adults as 16–60 years old, and the elderly as older than 60 years old. Isolates were obtained from various sources including stool (222/235), blood (11/235), and pus (2/235) samples. Of the total strains, 43.84% (101/235) were isolated from males and 56.16% (134/235) were isolated from females. Most of these isolates were obtained from patients with gastroenteritis, enteritis, or gastrointestinal disorders (187/235). Additionally, 50 strains (one from blood, and 49 from stool) originated from patients with symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection, 86% of which were from pediatric patients. Among the collected 235 S. Enteritidis strains, a total of 20 isolates exhibited resistance to ceftriaxone with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >256 µg/mL (8.51%, 20/235) from the Respiratory Medicine Department (1/20), Pediatric Department (9/20), and Intestinal Diseases Department (10/20). Furthermore, the resistance rates of 235 S. Enteritidis to other antimicrobial agents were as follows: ciprofloxacin 4.26% (10/235), azithromycin 19.15% (45/235), ampicillin 79.15% (186/235), cefoxitin 1.28% (3/235), imipenem 0, compound sulfamethoxazole 6.81% (16/235), chloramphenicol 5.11% (12/235), and tetracycline 28.51% (67/235).

2.2. Molecular Characteristics of Ceftriaxone-Resistant Salmonella Isolates

A total of 20 CRO-RSE isolates collected over the past decade underwent short-read sequencing, followed by long-read whole-genome sequencing of nine representative samples. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the 20 CRO-RSE isolates, revealing that isolates harboring the same CTX-M-type enzymes clustered together, except for S114, which originated from a blood sample and formed a distinct cluster (Figure 1a and Figure S1). MLST analysis identified all 20 CRO-RSE isolates as belonging to ST11, characterized by the following MLST profile: aroC 5, dnaN 2, hemD 3, hisD 7, purE 6, sucA 6, thrA 11. Additionally, 18 strains carried blaCTX-M-55, while two strains carried blaCTX-M-14, both located on plasmids. IncX1, IncFII(pHN7A8), IncFIB(S), and IncFII(S) were associated with plasmids harboring blaCTX-M-55. Furthermore, among 18 strains carrying blaCTX-M-55, ARGs were located on plasmids (fosA3; aph(3′)-IIa; blaTEM; aph(6)-Id; aph(3″)-Ib; sul2; oqxB; oqxA2; aph(6)-Id; tet(A); floR) (Table 1, Figure 1b).

2.3. Dissemination Characteristics of Ceftriaxone-Resistant Salmonella Isolates

2.3.1. Analysis of Plasmid Structure Harboring blaCTX-M-55

Among the 18 CRO-RSE isolates harboring blaCTX-M-55, 17 shared a common genetic structure surrounding IS26-blaTEM-hypothetical protein-blaCTX-M-55-IS26, whereas S114 had a unique genetic structure: ISEcp1-blaCTX-M-55-hypothetical protein. Additionally, plasmid S664 lacked some of the type IV secretion system (T4SS) genes (traM, traJ, traY, traA, traL, traE, traK, traB, traV, trbC, traW, traU, traC, traN, traF, traQ, traB) compared to other plasmids harboring blaCTX-M-55 (Figure 1b and Figure S2a). Concerning S114, it exhibited high similarity to pRHBSTW-00218_2 from Enterobacter hormaechei in wastewater influent in the UK (CP056650, coverage 100%, identity 99.99%), pKP4823_3 from Klebsiella pneumoniae in Homo sapiens in China (CP082793, coverage 100%, identity 99.98%), p20 from Shigella sonnei in Homo sapiens in Belgium (CP099778, coverage 98%, identity 99.80%), and pHNRD174 from Escherichia coli in ducks in China (KX246268, coverage 100%, identity 99.97%) (Figure S2b). All these plasmids belonged to the IncI1-type plasmid group, confirming the transmission of the blaCTX-M-55-bearing IncI1-type plasmid across different genera of bacteria and between the environment, animals, and humans.

2.3.2. Analysis of Plasmid Structure Harboring blaCTX-M-14

The S808 AGRs were located on plasmids. S661 carrying blaCTX-M-14 matched to S808-p1 (Figure S3a). S114-p1 carrying blaCTX-M-55 exhibited a structure similar to that of S808-p1, which carries blaCTX-M-14. Furthermore, S808-p1 shared a similar structure with plasmids from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), including the unnamed plasmid in Salmonella enterica from ground turkey in the USA (CP022064, coverage 85%, identity 99.30%), the plasmid p5848A2 identified in E. coli from the Netherlands (LR743516, coverage 85%, identity 99.31%), and the plasmid pESBL20160056 detected in E. coli found in Homo sapiens in Denmark (MH472638, coverage 85%, identity 99.30%) (Figure S3b). This suggests that both blaCTX-M-55 and blaCTX-M-14 are carried as passenger genes within IncI1-type plasmids during their propagation.

2.4. Plasmid Fusion Event of Two Plasmids

Plasmid fusion events were observed at sites S204, S131, S273, S379, and S664, with S161-p1 and S750-p1 serving as reference sequences. Among the fusion plasmids, S750-p1 lacked certain T4SS genes (traV, trbC, traW, traU, traC, traN, traF, traQ, traB, traG, ylpA, traD, traI, traX) compared to S161. Notably, S161-p1 has not been reported in the NCBI database, and the most similar plasmid is p12367A from Salmonella enterica (CP041177, coverage 68%, identity 99.99%). Using S204 as an example, S161-p1 consisted of S204-p1, S204-p2, and part1, which carried ARGs, including floR, tet(A), aph(6)-Id, aph(3″)-Ib, sul2, and fosA. (Figure 2a). Part1 was identified in other bacterial plasmids, such as pLKSZ02 from E. coli (CP030283, coverage 100%, identity 100%), p12367A from Salmonella enterica (CP041177, coverage 100%, identity 99.99%), and pSCKLB555-3 from K. pneumoniae (CP043935, coverage 100%, identity 99.04%). Above all, this suggests that part1-carrying ARGs have been transmitted by plasmids among different bacterial genera (Figure 2a). For a more detailed analysis of the fusion mechanism, we found that a plasmid composed of S204-p2 (pSEV) that carried virulence genes (rck, pefD, pefC, pefA, pefB, spvD, spvC, spvB, spvA, spvR) and part1 was inserted into S204-p1. This process was mediated by IS26 with 8 bp target site duplications (TSDs, TTTTTTCG) (Figure 2b,c). In addition, we observed intramolecular replicative transposition that led to the reversal of the segment between the original IS26 and the targeted site. Evidence supporting this phenomenon was derived from the presence of 8 bp complementary sequences (Figure 2b,d).

2.5. Plasmid Type Classification in This Study

For subsequent plasmid studies, the plasmids detected by CRO-RSE were categorized into two types: type A and type B (93 kbp). Type A comprised subtypes A1 (130–170 kb) and A2 (93 kb). Subtype A1 plasmids, represented by S750-p1 and S161-p1, harbored blaCTX-M-55 and virulence genes, along with four replicons: IncX1, IncFII (pHN7A8), IncFIB (S), and IncFII (S). Subtype A1 plasmids contained four parts (parts a, b, c, and d) of the T4SS genes (Figure 2a). The differences between parts c and d included the absence of traV in part d and the truncation of traJ in part c. Additionally, S750-p1 lacked parts a and b of the T4SS compared to S161-p1. Furthermore, the analysis of plasmid fusion events revealed that the S204-p1 plasmid was derived from a portion of the S161-p1 plasmid. The subtype A2 plasmids, including S204-p1, S131-p1, S273-p1, S379-p1, and S664-p1, carried blaCTX-M-55 and two replicons, IncX1 and IncFII (pHN7A8). Subtype A2 plasmids contained three parts (parts a, b, and d) of the T4SS genes (Figure 2a). Additionally, S664-p1 lacked the b and d parts of the T4SS genes compared to the other subtype A2 plasmids. Type B plasmids, represented by S808-p1 and S114-p1, carried blaCTX-M-55 or blaCTX-M-14 and one replicon, IncI1 (Alpha). Type B plasmids contained part e of the T4SS genes (Figure S3b), which differed from parts a, b, c, and d. Both type A and B plasmids harbored the origins of transfer (oriT), relaxase, coupling protein (T4CP), and T4SS. Plasmids containing these four parts were considered conjugable plasmids.

2.6. Results of Plasmid Conjugation

The results of plasmid conjugation are shown in Table 2. Susceptibility testing of transconjugants revealed a significant increase in recipient resistance to ceftriaxone upon conjugation of plasmids containing the blaCTX-M-type gene (Table 3). Subtype A2 plasmids were capable of conjugating with RrifSL1344, RrifJ53, and RrifATCC13883. Despite carrying oriT, relaxase, T4CP, and T4SS, S131-p1 failed to conjugate to any of the four recipients in our experiment. Furthermore, compared to other subtype A2 plasmids, S664-p1 could only conjugate to E. coli J53, potentially limiting its conjugative capability owing to the absence of a portion of the T4SS (absence of b and d). Similarly, compared to other subtype A1 plasmids, S750-p1 could only conjugate to S. typhi SL1344, likely because of the absence of a portion of the T4SS (absence of a and b). Additionally, S161 carrying a subtype A1 plasmid, S379 carrying a subtype A2 plasmid, and S808 carrying a type B plasmid were selected as donor bacteria, and RrifJ53 served as the recipient bacterium to calculate the conjugation frequency. The results revealed that the conjugation efficiencies of S161-p1, S379-p1, and S808-p1 were 1.65 × 10−6, 0.75 × 10−4, and 9.09 × 10−4, respectively. In summary, none of the subtype A1 plasmids were able to conjugate to K. pneumoniae ATCC13883, unlike the subtype A2 plasmids. Moreover, the conjugation efficiency of the subtype A2 plasmid was 45 times higher than that of the subtype A1 plasmid. Consequently, subtype A2 plasmids exhibited greater transmission potential than subtype A1 plasmids, implying that the absence of virulence genes and ARGs promoted plasmid dissemination. Regarding type B plasmids, both S114-p1 and S808-p1 were capable of conjugating with S. typhi SL1344, E. coli J53, and K. pneumoniae ATCC13883. Notably, the type B plasmid (S808-p1) could conjugate with Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC17978, indicating its potential to spread to A. baumannii. Furthermore, the conjugation efficiency of the type B plasmid was 12 times higher than that of the subtype A2 plasmid, indicating that the type B plasmid (S808-p1) had greater transmission capacity than the type A plasmid.

2.7. Fitness Cost Analysis of Different Plasmids under Different Strain Backgrounds

Subtype A1 plasmids exhibited an increased fitness cost in various Enterobacteriaceae species (SL1344 and J53) (Figure 3a). Subtype A2 plasmids displayed varying fitness costs across different genera of Enterobacteriaceae (SL1344, J53, ATCC13883) (Figure 3b). Overall, within Enterobacteriaceae, certain transconjugants carrying the subtype A2 plasmids exhibited no fitness cost, whereas all those harboring the subtype A1 plasmids displayed an increased fitness cost. This suggests that the subtype A2 plasmids have better adaptability than the subtype A1 plasmid within Enterobacteriaceae. Additionally, type B plasmids increased the fitness costs only in E. coli J53 (Figure 3c). Consequently, the type B plasmids exhibit better adaptability than the type A plasmids.

2.8. Results of Plasmid Stability

Due to its higher transmissibility compared to type A plasmids, the type B plasmid (S808-p1) holds the potential to disseminate to A. baumannii. Transconjugants SL1344-S808-p1, J53-S808-p1, ATCC13883-S808-p1, and ATCC17978-S808-p1 were employed to assess the stability of type B plasmids within Enterobacteriaceae or A. baumannii. The S808-p1 plasmid exhibited stability in SL1344-S808-p1, J53-S808-p1, and ATCC13883-S808-p1 transconjugants over 20 consecutive days of passage. Conversely, strain ATCC17978-S808-p1 began losing the plasmid on day 5, with a plasmid loss rate of 6.94%. This loss rate stabilized at 81.94% on day 10 and 79.17% on day 15, ultimately reaching 93.75% by day 20 (Figure 3d). Despite the potential for the type B plasmid (S808-p1) to disseminate to A. baumannii, it could only maintain a stable presence for five days.

3. Discussion and Conclusions

In this study, we investigated 20 strains of CRO-RSE collected from Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang Province. Our findings revealed a close association between the spread of blaCTX-M-type genes and the presence of IS26 and ISEcp1 elements. Analysis of the plasmid structure indicated a highly conserved fundamental backbone, with regions carrying ARGs showing frequent alterations. These ARG-containing regions consistently harbored one or several mobile elements (eg. IS26 and ISEcp1), suggesting multiple insertion or recombination events due to mobile elements. Consequently, these regions could act as hotspots for homologous recombination [13]. A study reporting on S. enterica demonstrated that IS26-mediated composite transposon may facilitate the dissemination of blaCTX-M-55 [14]. Moreover, numerous studies on different serotypes of S. enterica also observed the transmission of blaCTX-M-type genes in association with IS26 and ISEcp1 [15,16,17,18]. Additionally, ceftriaxone-resistant isolates S161 and S750, collected in 2013 and 2020, respectively, exhibited a unique plasmid configuration where two plasmids harboring virulence genes and ARGs were fused, mediated by IS26. The emergence of such fusion plasmids, encoding both ARGs and virulence genes, presents a novel challenge to public health. Therefore, continuous monitoring of IS26-mediated transmission of significant pathogens is essential. In 2021, a study reported the presence of two hybrid plasmids mediated by IS26 and Tn6952 in S. Enteritidis [19]. However, this study did not assess the conjugative ability of plasmids through conjugation experiments.
A previous study in Guangdong, China, reported that the plasmids IncI1 and IncFII were likely the primary replicons contributing to the prevalence of blaCTX-M-55 in E. coli [20]. Additionally, previous reports indicated a close association between IncF-type plasmids and ESBL-producing strains of E. coli [21]. In our study, replicons IncI1(Alpha), IncFII(S), IncFII(pHN7A8), IncFIB(S), and IncX1 were associated with the spread of blaCTX-M-55. Several previous studies reported that the IncI1 plasmids carrying the blaCTX-M-type genes conferred resistance to ceftriaxone in Salmonella [3,15,22]. In this study, we observed a similar trend. Importantly, we found, for the first time, that the IncI1 plasmid carrying the blaCTX-M-type gene had the potential to spread across Enterobacteriaceae to A. baumannii through conjugation experiments. However, its stability in A. baumannii was limited, persisting for only approximately 5 days. While conjugation and growth curve experiments indicated that the Inc1 (Alpha)-type plasmid (type B plasmid) exhibited superior characteristics over type A plasmids in terms of transmissibility and fitness cost, it was noteworthy that the presence of type B plasmids (only three strains) was not prevalent among the 20 CRO-RSE samples collected from 235 S. Enteritidis. However, given the advantages of Inc1 (Alpha)-type plasmids in terms of transmission capacity and fitness cost, they are likely to emerge as primary vectors for the transmission of the blaCTX-M-type gene in the future, warranting further investigation into their activities.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Collection of Isolates and Clinical Information

A total of 235 strains of S. Enteritidis were isolated from patients across various clinical departments of Hangzhou First People’s Hospital between 2010 and 2020. Colonies with correct characteristics, such as colorless transparency, with or without a black center, were selected from SS agar and streaked to ensure purity. Subsequently, the selected strains were amplified and resuspended in 20% glycerol broth before being stored in a −80 °C freezer for subsequent experiments. Serological agglutination tests were conducted using the Salmonella Diagnostic Serum Test Kit (Ningbo Tianrun Biopharmaceutical Company Limited, Ningbo, China) for the identification of S. Enteritidis. Clinical data, including collection date, gender, age, place of origin, department, and disease, were retrieved from the hospital’s network system, with identifiers concealed to ensure privacy.

4.2. Bacterial Isolate Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Test

All 235 isolates were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry systems (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Antibiotic susceptibility testing was conducted for all collected isolates, covering azithromycin, ampicillin, cefoxitin, imipenem, cotrimoxazole, carbenicillin, tetracycline, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin, through the disk diffusion method. Additionally, the MICs of transconjugants and 20 CRO-RSE, which include ceftriaxone, were determined using the broth dilution method. Interpretation of the results was based on the 2023 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI) [23] and the 2022 European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing [24].

4.3. Whole-Genome Sequencing of CRO-RSE Strains

We selected CRO-RSE for whole-genome sequencing, and genomic DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Whole-genome sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq X-Ten platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) employing a 150 bp paired-end strategy. The reads were assembled using Shovill (https://github.com/tseemann/shovill, accessed on 15 May 2023) [25]. Then, nine CRO-RSE isolates, eight strains carrying blaCTX-M-55 and one strain carrying blaCTX-M-14, were subjected to Nanopore MinION long-read sequencing (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK). The filtered MinION raw reads were utilized and processed using Raven v1.1.10 [26], employing default parameters. Subsequently, Trycycler [27] was employed to validate the circularity of the complete genome sequence. Any errors were rectified using Illumina reads through Pilon v1.24 [28].

4.4. Genetic Structure Surrounding blaCTX-M-type Gene

For ceftriaxone-resistant isolates, ARGs were identified by ABRicate v0.8.13 (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate, accessed on 23 July 2023) based on the ResFinder database (http://genomicepidemiology.org/, accessed on 23 July 2023) [29]. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was determined using the MLST 2.0 server, and the Inc-type plasmid of the strain was screened using plasmidfinder [30]. Additionally, nine CRO-RSE isolates were annotated by Prokka [31], and then Easyfig v2.2.5 (http://easyfig.sourceforge.net/, accessed on 5 August 2023) [32], proksee (https://proksee.ca/, accessed on 8 August 2023) [33], and BRIG v0.95 (https://sourceforge.net/projects/brig/, accessed on 10 August 2023) [34] were used to align different plasmids. In addition, we also used NCBI BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 13 August 2023) to seek similar plasmids containing blaCTX-M-55 or blaCTX-M-14.

4.5. Phylogenetic Analysis

A total of 20 CRO-RSE strains were utilized for phylogenetic analysis based on their SNPs. Genome alignment was established using Snippy (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy, accessed on 10 June 2023) with default parameters [35]. The unrooted maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed employing FastTree [36]. The tree was then visualized and annotated using the iTOL tree [37].

4.6. Plasmid Transfer Assays

Nine strains (S204, S131, S273, S379, S664, S161, S750, S114, and S808) served as donor bacteria, which underwent short-read and long-read sequencing. Recipients comprised RrifSL1344, RrifJ53, RrifATCC13883, and RrifATCC17978. Donor plasmids carrying the blaCTX-M-type gene were transferred to the recipients. Donors and recipients were cultivated in 2 mL of Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB) for four hours at 37 °C on a shaker. Subsequently, 100 μL of both donors and the recipients were mixed, and 20 µL of the mixture was spotted onto a 0.22 μm membrane (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) affixed to Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA), followed by overnight incubation at 37 °C. The next day, the bacteria on the membrane were dissolved in MHB, and 20 μL was spotted onto a double antibiotic plate, which was then incubated overnight at 37 °C. Transconjugants were selected on a double antibiotic plate containing rifampicin (1000 mg/L) and ceftriaxone (64 mg/L). Antibiotic sensitivity testing results were interpreted according to CLSI guidelines (2023) [11]. The presence of blaCTX-M-type genes, replicon genes, and Salmonella’s housekeeping gene aroC in transconjugants was confirmed via PCR. Transconjugants were also identified using MALDI-TOF. Conjugation frequency was calculated as the number of transconjugants per donor.

4.7. Bacterial Growth Curve Assay

Three single colonies of both recipients and transconjugants were selected and inoculated into MHB, with blank controls set up simultaneously. Ten microliters of bacterial solution were added to 1 mL of MHB culture medium, equivalent to a 1:100 dilution of the overnight bacterial culture. This diluted solution was then added into a honeycomb plate, with 200 µL per well, conducting three technical replicates for each sample while simultaneously establishing a blank control. The honeycomb plate was then placed in an automatic growth curve instrument (Growth Curves, Turku, Finland). The parameters were set to 37 °C, and the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) was measured every 5 min for a total of 20 h. The growth rate during the logarithmic phase was calculated, and the relative growth rate of the strain was determined using R script [38], with the recipients serving as the reference.

4.8. Plasmid Stability Assay

After overnight culture, the bacterial solution was diluted 1:1000 with 2 mL of MHB medium and incubated overnight with shaking at 200 rpm. This process was repeated daily up to the 20th generation. During this time, bacterial solutions from the 5th, 10th, 15th, and 20th generations were diluted onto MHA plates, and 48 single colonies were streaked onto both an antibiotic plate containing ceftriaxone (64 mg/L) and an MHA plate to verify ceftriaxone-resistant plasmids. Transconjugants that grew on both ceftriaxone plates and MHA were considered positive for plasmid retention, while those that could not grow on ceftriaxone plates but grew on MHA were considered negative for plasmid retention. The plasmid loss rate was calculated using the following formula: Plasmid loss rate = (mean number of negative clones from three replicates/48) × 100.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics13050456/s1, Figure S1. Visualization of the number of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variant sites among 20 CRO-RSE. Figure S2. Analysis of plasmids harboring blaCTX-M-55. (a) Comparative analysis of plasmids harboring blaCTX-M-55 with the reference sequence S204-p1. (b) Linear comparison of blaCTX-M-55-bearing plasmids from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database with the reference sequence S114-p1. Figure S3. Analysis of plasmids harboring blaCTX-M-14. (a) Comparative analysis of the short read sequencing data from S661 with the reference sequence S808-p1. (b) Linear comparison of plasmids structurally similar to S808-p1.

Author Contributions

Data curation, S.Y.; formal analysis, S.Y.; funding acquisition, J.F. and Y.Y.; Investigation, J.F., L.Y. and L.Z.; methodology, S.Y., J.H. and L.Z.; project administration, Y.Y.; resources, J.F., L.Y., Y.Y. and X.H.; software, X.H.; supervision, Y.Y.; validation, L.Y.; visualization, S.Y.; writing—original draft, S.Y.; writing—review and editing, J.H. and X.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Key Research and Development of the Ministry of Technology (funder: Yunsong Yu, funding number: 2023YFC2307100) and Zhejiang Provincial Health Commission (funder: Jianzhong Fan, funding number: 2023KY171).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Approval was obtained from the local ethics committees of Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Westlake University School of Medicine (approval number: ZN-20231120-0268-01, 14 December 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

The study did not involve any sensitive personal data from the patients. Furthermore, the research only utilized previously saved or discarded biological samples and did not interfere with the clinical diagnosis or treatment processes. Considering these conditions, the requirement for informed consent was waived.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 4 November 2023) and the accession number(s) can be found in BioProject: PRJNA1023753.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Guard-Petter, J. The chicken, the egg and Salmonella Enteritidis. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 3, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bahramianfard, H.; Derakhshandeh, A.; Naziri, Z.; Khaltabadi Farahani, R. Prevalence, virulence factor and antimicrobial resistance analysis of Salmonella Enteritidis from poultry and egg samples in Iran. BMC Vet. Res. 2021, 17, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wong, M.H.; Kan, B.; Chan, E.W.; Yan, M.; Chen, S. IncI1 Plasmids Carrying Various blaCTX-M Genes Contribute to Ceftriaxone Resistance in Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis in China. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 982–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hurley, D.; McCusker, M.P.; Fanning, S.; Martins, M. Salmonella-host interactions—Modulation of the host innate immune system. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gal-Mor, O. Persistent Infection and Long-Term Carriage of Typhoidal and Nontyphoidal Salmonellae. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, 00088-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cheng, R.A.; Eade, C.R.; Wiedmann, M. Embracing Diversity: Differences in Virulence Mechanisms, Disease Severity, and Host Adaptations Contribute to the Success of Nontyphoidal Salmonella as a Foodborne Pathogen. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Y.; Song, C.; Duan, G.; Zhu, J.; Yang, H.; Xi, Y.; Fan, Q. Transposition of ISEcp1 modulates blaCTX-M-55-mediated Shigella flexneri resistance to cefalothin. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2013, 42, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Castanheira, M.; Simner, P.J.; Bradford, P.A. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: An update on their characteristics, epidemiology and detection. JAC Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 3, dlab092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cantón, R.; Coque, T.M. The CTX-M β-lactamase pandemic. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2006, 9, 466–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Partridge, S.R.; Kwong, S.M.; Firth, N.; Jensen, S.O. Mobile Genetic Elements Associated with Antimicrobial Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 31, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Harmer, C.J.; Hall, R.M. IS26-Mediated Formation of Transposons Carrying Antibiotic Resistance Genes. mSphere 2016, 1, 00038-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bonnin, R.A.; Poirel, L.; Sampaio, J.L.; Nordmann, P. Complete sequence of broad-host-range plasmid pRIO-5 harboring the extended-spectrum-β-lactamase gene blaBES-1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 1116–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, Y.; Wang, Q.; Peng, K.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, X.; Mohsin, M.; Li, R.; Wang, Z. Distribution and genomic characterization of tigecycline-resistant tet(X4)-positive Escherichia coli of swine farm origin. Microb. Genom. 2021, 7, 000667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, L.; Olsen, R.H.; Xiao, J.; Meng, H.; Peng, S.; Shi, L. Genetic context of blaCTX–M–55 and qnrS1 genes in a foodborne Salmonella enterica serotype Saintpaul isolate from China. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 899062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qin, X.; Zhang, Z. Emergence of a Hybrid IncI1-Iα Plasmid-Encoded bla(CTX-M-101) Conferring Resistance to Cephalosporins in Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Coipan, C.E.; Westrell, T.; van Hoek, A.; Alm, E.; Kotila, S.; Berbers, B.; de Keersmaecker, S.C.J.; Ceyssens, P.J.; Borg, M.L.; Chattaway, M.; et al. Genomic epidemiology of emerging ESBL-producing Salmonella Kentucky bla (CTX-M-14b) in Europe. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 2124–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fu, Y.; Xu, X.; Zhang, L.; Xiong, Z.; Ma, Y.; Wei, Y.; Chen, Z.; Bai, J.; Liao, M.; Zhang, J. Fourth Generation Cephalosporin Resistance Among Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Isolates in Shanghai, China Conferred by bla (CTX-M-55) Harboring Plasmids. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, L.; Olsen, R.H.; Song, A.; Xiao, J.; Wang, C.; Meng, H.; Shi, L. First Report of a Foodborne Salmonella enterica Serovar Gloucester (4:i:l,w) ST34 Strain Harboring bla (CTX-M-) (55) and qnrS Genes Located in IS26-Mediated Composite Transposon. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 646101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, Y.-Y.; He, D.-D.; Zhang, M.-K.; Pan, Y.-S.; Wu, H.; Yuan, L.; Liu, J.-H.; Hu, G.-Z. The Formation of Two Hybrid Plasmids Mediated by IS26 and Tn6952 in Salmonella enterica Serotype Enteritidis. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 676574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zeng, S.; Luo, J.; Li, X.; Zhuo, C.; Wu, A.; Chen, X.; Huang, L. Molecular Epidemiology and Characteristics of CTX-M-55 Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli From Guangzhou, China. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 730012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Brolund, A.; Sandegren, L. Characterization of ESBL disseminating plasmids. Infect. Dis. 2016, 48, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Djeghout, B.; Saha, S.; Sajib, M.S.I.; Tanmoy, A.M.; Islam, M.; Kay, G.L.; Langridge, G.C.; Endtz, H.P.; Wain, J.; Saha, S.K. Ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella Typhi carries an IncI1-ST31 plasmid encoding CTX-M-15. J. Med. Microbiol. 2018, 67, 620–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 33rd ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Berwyn, PA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  24. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters. Version 12.0. 2022. Available online: http://www.eucast.org (accessed on 10 May 2023).
  25. Seemann, T. Shovill: Faster SPAdes Assembly of Illumina Reads. 2017. Available online: https://github.com/tseemann/shovill (accessed on 15 May 2023).
  26. Vaser, R.; Šikić, M. Time-and memory-efficient genome assembly with Raven. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2021, 1, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wick, R.R.; Judd, L.M.; Cerdeira, L.T.; Hawkey, J.; Méric, G.; Vezina, B.; Wyres, K.L.; Holt, K.E. Trycycler: Consensus long-read assemblies for bacterial genomes. Genome Biol. 2021, 22, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Walker, B.J.; Abeel, T.; Shea, T.; Priest, M.; Abouelliel, A.; Sakthikumar, S.; Cuomo, C.A.; Zeng, Q.; Wortman, J.; Young, S.K.; et al. Pilon: An integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zankari, E.; Hasman, H.; Cosentino, S.; Vestergaard, M.; Rasmussen, S.; Lund, O.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Larsen, M.V. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 2640–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Carattoli, A.; Hasman, H. PlasmidFinder and In Silico pMLST: Identification and Typing of Plasmid Replicons in Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS). Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2075, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sullivan, M.J.; Petty, N.K.; Beatson, S.A. Easyfig: A genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 1009–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Grant, J.R.; Enns, E.; Marinier, E.; Mandal, A.; Herman, E.K.; Chen, C.-y.; Graham, M.; Van Domselaar, G.; Stothard, P. Proksee: In-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W484–W492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Alikhan, N.F.; Petty, N.K.; Ben Zakour, N.L.; Beatson, S.A. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): Simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Seemann, T. Snippy: Fast Bacterial Variant Calling from NGS Reads [Internet]. 2015. Available online: https://github.com/tseemann/snippy (accessed on 10 June 2023).
  36. Price, M.N.; Dehal, P.S.; Arkin, A.P. FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v5: An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W293–W296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. He, J.; Shi, Q.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, W.; Lan, P.; Xu, Q.; Hu, H.; Chen, Q.; Fan, J.; Jiang, Y.; et al. Opposite evolution of pathogenicity driven by in vivo wzc and wcaJ mutations in ST11-KL64 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Drug Resist. Updates 2023, 66, 100891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antibiotics 13 00456 g001
Figure 1. Molecular characteristics of CRO-RSE. (a) Core-genome phylogeny of 20 CTX-M-type-positive S. Enteritidis strains, based on the reference sequence of S. Enteritidis S114. The tree scale indicates the number of allelic differences. (b) Comparative analysis of ten CRO-RSE isolates, identified solely via short-read sequencing, carrying the blaCTX-M-55 gene, using S204-p1 as the reference sequence.
Figure 1. Molecular characteristics of CRO-RSE. (a) Core-genome phylogeny of 20 CTX-M-type-positive S. Enteritidis strains, based on the reference sequence of S. Enteritidis S114. The tree scale indicates the number of allelic differences. (b) Comparative analysis of ten CRO-RSE isolates, identified solely via short-read sequencing, carrying the blaCTX-M-55 gene, using S204-p1 as the reference sequence.
Antibiotics 13 00456 g001
Antibiotics 13 00456 g002
Figure 2. Plasmid fusion or cleavage event of two plasmids. (a) Fusion event observed at S204, S131, S273, S379, and S664 with reference to S161. The details of a–d parts are explanated in Table 2. (b) Detailed illustration of the fusion mechanism using S204 as an example. (c) Plots depicting the fusion patterns of the two plasmids. (d) Plots illustrating the pattern of intramolecular replicative transposition in S161-p1.
Figure 2. Plasmid fusion or cleavage event of two plasmids. (a) Fusion event observed at S204, S131, S273, S379, and S664 with reference to S161. The details of a–d parts are explanated in Table 2. (b) Detailed illustration of the fusion mechanism using S204 as an example. (c) Plots depicting the fusion patterns of the two plasmids. (d) Plots illustrating the pattern of intramolecular replicative transposition in S161-p1.
Antibiotics 13 00456 g002
Antibiotics 13 00456 g003
Figure 3. Comparison of relative growth rates of recipients carrying subtype A1 (a), A2 (b), and B-type (c) plasmids. (d) Plasmid stability experiments. The x-axis represents the number of generations of transconjugants, while the y-axis represents the number of transconjugants that still contain S808-p1. ns: p value ≥ 0.05, not significant; *: p value is from 0.01 to 0.05, significant; **: p value is from 0.001 to 0.01, very significant; ***: p value < 0.001, very significant.
Figure 3. Comparison of relative growth rates of recipients carrying subtype A1 (a), A2 (b), and B-type (c) plasmids. (d) Plasmid stability experiments. The x-axis represents the number of generations of transconjugants, while the y-axis represents the number of transconjugants that still contain S808-p1. ns: p value ≥ 0.05, not significant; *: p value is from 0.01 to 0.05, significant; **: p value is from 0.001 to 0.01, very significant; ***: p value < 0.001, very significant.
Antibiotics 13 00456 g003
Table 1. # Genomic characteristics of nine CRO-RSE isolates.
Table 1. # Genomic characteristics of nine CRO-RSE isolates.
* Location & (Plasmid_Type)Size (bp)GC (%)blaCTX-M-typeOther Resistance GenesPlasmid Replicons
S273Chromosome4,679,99052.18-sinH; golS; golT; mdsB-
p1 (A2)90,39951.75blaCTX-M-55fosA3; aph(3′)-IIa; blaTEMIncX1;
IncFII(pHN7A8)
p2 (pSEV)59,37251.95--IncFIB(S); IncFII(S)
S379Chromosome4,679,47652.18-sinH; golS; golT; mdsB-
p1 (A2)113,30149.97blaCTX-M-55blaTEM; aph(6)-Id; aph(3″)-Ib; sul2IncX1; IncFII(pHN7A8);
IncN
p2 (pSEV)57,12851.85-blaTEMIncFIB(S); IncFII(S)
p3390451.13--Col156
S131Chromosome4,680,02952.18-sinH; golS; golT; mdsB-
p1 (A2)93,98552.01blaCTX-M-55fosA3; blaTEM; aph(3′)-IIa; oqxB; oqxA2IncX1;
IncFII(pHN7A8)
p2 (pSEV)59,37251.95--IncFIB(S); IncFII(S)
S204Chromosome4,679,98952.18-sinH; golS; golT; mdsB-
p1 (A2)93,63252.02blaCTX-M-55oqxA2; oqxB; aph(3′)-IIa; fosA3; blaTEMIncX1;
IncFII(pHN7A8)
p2 (pSEV)59,37251.95--IncFIB(S); IncFII(S)
p352,89143.83--IncFII(p96A);
IncFII(S)
S161Chromosome4,679,61552.18-sinH; golS; golT; mdsB-
p1 (A1)172,36752.65blaCTX-M-55blaTEM; oqxA2; oqxB; aph(3′)-IIa; fosA3; sul2; aph(3″)-Ib; aph(6)-Id; tet(A); floRIncX1;
IncFII(pHN7A8);
IncFIB(S); IncFII(S)
S114Chromosome4,679,99252.18-sinH; golS; golT; mdsB-
p1 (B)86,19149.66blaCTX-M-55-IncI1(Alpha)
p2 (pSEV)64,32751.76-blaTEMIncFIB(S); IncFII(S)
p329,33647.22-blaTEM; aph(6)-Id; aph(3″)-Ib; tet(A); aph(6)-Id; aph(3″)-Ib; sul2IncX1
p4664748.52--ColRNAI
S808Chromosome4,679,74152.18-sinH; golS; golT; mdsB-
p1 (B)93,23049.88blaCTX-M-14-IncI1(Alpha)
p2 (pSEV)64,32751.76-blaTEMIncFIB(S); IncFII(S)
p324,48444.75-blaTEM; aph(6)-Id; aph(3″)-Ib; sul2IncX1
S664Chromosome4,679,29852.18-sinH; golS; golT; mdsB-
p1 (A2)67,20752.28blaCTX-M-55aph(3′)-IIa; sul2; blaTEMIncFII(pHN7A8); IncX1
p2 (pSEV)59,32351.95- IncFIB(S); IncFII(S)
S750Chromosome4,680,77452.18-sinH; golS; golT; mdsB
p1 (A1)116,05453.10blaCTX-M-55blaTEM;
oqxA2; oqxB; aph(3′)-IIa; aph(6)-Id; aph(3″)-Ib; sul2; tet(A); floR;		IncFII(S); IncX1
# Genomic characteristics of nine CRO-RSE isolates: The genomic characteristics of the 9 CRO-RSE isolates sequenced by both short-read and long-read sequencing methods. * Location: p1-p4 refer to plasmid 1-plasmid 4. & (Plasmid_type): In this study, plasmids carrying blaCTX-M-type gene were divided into A1, A2, and B-type (2.5 below for details). S. Enteritidis usually harbors a virulence plasmid (pSEV) (sequence ID: NZ_JACEGM010000032.1, 58,347 bp) that is similar to S808-p2, S114-p2, S204-p2, S131-p2, S273-p2, and S664-p2 (coverage: 99–100%, identity: 99.99–100%). pSEV was also similar to S379-p2 (coverage: 86%, identity: 100%).
Table 2. Plasmid transfer results.
Table 2. Plasmid transfer results.
Isolate StrainThe Plasmid TransferringT4SSblaCTX-MPlasmid_TypeRecipient SL1344Recipient J53Recipient ATCC
13883		Recipient ATCC
17978
S273S273-p1a, b, d55A2+++–
S379S379-p1a, b, d55A2+++–
S131S131-p1a, b, d55A2––––
S204S204-p1a, b, d55A2+++–
S664S664-p1a55A2–+––
S161S161-p1a, b, c, d55A1++––
S750S750-p1c, d55A1+–––
S114S114-p1e55B+++–
S808S808-p1e14B++++
“+”: referring to successfully conjugated strains. “–”: referring to unsuccessfully conjugated strains. Part a: traG, ylpA, traD (T4CP), traI (Relaxase), traX. Part b: traV, trbC, traW, traU, traC, traN, traF, traQ, traB. Part c: traM, traJ, traY, traA, traL, traE, traK, traB, traV. Part d: traM, ΔtraJ, traY, traA, traL, traE, traK, traB. Part e: Relaxase, trbC(T4CP), trbB, trbA, traY, traX, traW, traV, traU, traT, traS, traR, traQ, traP, traO, traN, traM, traL, traK, traJ, traI, traH. (T4SS can be seen in Figure 2 and Figure S3).
Table 3. Results of ceftriaxone susceptibility testing in the transconjugants.
Table 3. Results of ceftriaxone susceptibility testing in the transconjugants.
Recipient (CRO_MIC)S161-p1S114-p1S204-p1S808-p1S750-p1S273-p1S379-p1S664-p1
RrifSL1344
(0.125)		10242048204851251220481024-
RrifJ53
(0.06)		204810241024512-1024512512
Rrif13883
(0.06)		-20482048512-10241024-
Rrif17978
(8)		--->2048----
The first column in parentheses represents the MIC of ceftriaxone for the recipient, while the ceftriaxone MICs of the donors were all higher than 256 µg/mL. The rows correspond to the recipients, with the columns indicating the conjugated plasmids, and the numbers denote the MIC of ceftriaxone for the transconjugants (µg/mL). The recipients included rifampicin-induced S. Typhimurium SL1344 (RrifSL1344), E. coli J53 (RrifJ53), K. pneumoniae ATCC13883 (RrifATCC13883), and A. baumannii ATCC17978 (RrifATCC17978).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, S.; Fan, J.; Yu, L.; He, J.; Zhang, L.; Yu, Y.; Hua, X. Dissemination of Ceftriaxone-Resistant Salmonella Enteritidis Harboring Plasmids Encoding blaCTX-M-55 or blaCTX-M-14 Gene in China. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13050456

AMA Style

Yang S, Fan J, Yu L, He J, Zhang L, Yu Y, Hua X. Dissemination of Ceftriaxone-Resistant Salmonella Enteritidis Harboring Plasmids Encoding blaCTX-M-55 or blaCTX-M-14 Gene in China. Antibiotics. 2024; 13(5):456. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13050456

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Siyuan, Jianzhong Fan, Lifei Yu, Jintao He, Linghong Zhang, Yunsong Yu, and Xiaoting Hua. 2024. "Dissemination of Ceftriaxone-Resistant Salmonella Enteritidis Harboring Plasmids Encoding blaCTX-M-55 or blaCTX-M-14 Gene in China" Antibiotics 13, no. 5: 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13050456

APA Style

Yang, S., Fan, J., Yu, L., He, J., Zhang, L., Yu, Y., & Hua, X. (2024). Dissemination of Ceftriaxone-Resistant Salmonella Enteritidis Harboring Plasmids Encoding blaCTX-M-55 or blaCTX-M-14 Gene in China. Antibiotics, 13(5), 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13050456

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop