Next Article in Journal
Efficient Absorbance-Based Assay for Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales
Previous Article in Journal
Silver and Gold Compounds as Antibiotics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genomic Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Implicated in Bloodstream Infections, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: A Pilot Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genomic Characterization of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing and Third-Generation Cephalosporin-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolated from Stools of Primary Healthcare Patients in Ethiopia

1
Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hossana P.O. Box 667, Ethiopia
2
Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 1176, Ethiopia
3
Department of Microbiology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
4
Ohio State Global One Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
5
College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 1176, Ethiopia
6
Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 1005, Ethiopia
7
Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
8
Institute of Microbiology and Parasitology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
9
National Laboratory of Health, Environment and Food, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2024, 13(9), 851; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13090851
Submission received: 15 July 2024 / Revised: 30 August 2024 / Accepted: 3 September 2024 / Published: 5 September 2024

Abstract

:
The global spread of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in Escherichia coli is a major public health concern. The aim of this study was to investigate the genomic characteristics of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli from a previously obtained collection of 260 E. coli isolates from fecal samples of patients attending primary healthcare facilities in Addis Ababa and Hossana, Ethiopia. A total of 29 E. coli isolates (19 phenotypically confirmed ESBL-producing and 10 third-generation cephalosporin-resistant isolates) were used. Whole-genome sequencing (NextSeq 2000 system, Illumina) and bioinformatic analysis (using online available tools) were performed to identify ARGs, virulence-associated genes (VAGs), mobile genetic elements (MGEs), serotypes, sequence types (STs), phylogeny and conjugative elements harbored by these isolates. A total of 7 phylogenetic groups, 22 STs, including ST131, and 23 serotypes with different VAGs were identified. A total of 31 different acquired ARGs and 10 chromosomal mutations in quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) were detected. The isolates harbored diverse types of MGEs, with IncF plasmids being the most prevalent (66.7%). Genetic determinants associated with conjugative transfer were identified in 75.9% of the E. coli isolates studied. In conclusion, the isolates exhibited considerable genetic diversity and showed a high potential for transferability of ARGs and VAGs. Bioinformatic analyses also revealed that the isolates exhibited substantial genetic diversity in phylogenetic groups, sequence types (ST) and serogroups and were harboring a variety of virulence-associated genes (VAGs). Thus, the studied isolates have a high potential for transferability of ARGs and VAGs.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health problem that poses a significant threat to public health [1]. It is rapidly increasing and is expected to result in high healthcare costs and poor patient outcomes, potentially making AMR the leading cause of global mortality [2]. Africa and Asia are the two regions highly affected by AMR, with the potential for over 4.1 million annual deaths from AMR by 2050 [3]. Escherichia coli is one of the most important human pathogens and represents a major public health challenge. It is also one of the widely abundant commensal organisms in the gastrointestinal tracts of humans and animals, known for its ability to easily develop resistance to antimicrobial agents and to serve as a vector for the spread of AMR, which is a major problem for humans and animals [4]. In Ethiopia, there is an emergence and spread of resistance to common antimicrobials among E. coli isolates, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs [5].
Infections with E. coli resistant to critically important antimicrobials, such as third-generation cephalosporins, have increased worldwide [6,7] and pose a challenge to clinical antibiotic therapy. E. coli strains resistant to third-generation cephalosporin antibiotics are frequently associated with the expression of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) [8]. ESBL production is the most problematic mechanism of antibiotic resistance, as many β-lactamase-encoding genes are typically carried on mobile genetic elements, such as plasmids, which can be easily transferred between different bacterial species [9]. Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins in E. coli can complicate the treatment of infections and lead to the use of a last-resort antimicrobial class such as carbapenems [10], which are not readily available in developing countries.
Bacterial populations acquire resistance to antibiotics either through chromosomal mutation or through horizontal gene transfer (HGT) from other bacteria that are either distant or closely related. This transfer is facilitated by mobile genetic elements (MGEs) [11]. MGEs are DNA elements that can move within or between bacterial cells, either from a chromosome to a plasmid or between plasmids through non-conjugative transposons, gene cassettes, and insertion sequence elements, or between DNA molecules through MGE elements capable of self-replication and conjugative transfer, such as plasmids and integrative conjugative elements [12].
MGEs carry genes that can confer resistance to antibiotics and play a critical role in facilitating the acquisition and spread of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) through HGT [13]. The main mechanisms of HGT are conjugation, transduction, and transformation [14]. Conjugation drives the rapid evolution and adaptation of bacterial strains by facilitating the spread of diverse metabolic capabilities, including virulence, biofilm formation, and heavy metal and antibiotic resistance [15]. The conjugative transfer regions of the self-transmissible MGEs typically involve an origin of transfer (oriT) region, a conjugative type IV secretion system (T4SS), type IV coupling protein (ATPase), and a relaxase to deliver single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) into the recipient cell [16]. Understanding the profile of virulence-associated genes (VAGs), ARGs, and MGEs among E. coli strains circulating in a certain region is important for preventing the dissemination of antibiotic resistance, virulence factors, and other clinically relevant traits through E. coli bacterial populations. As there have been only a few studies conducted on this topic in Ethiopia, the aim of this study was to assess the distribution and diversity of ARGs, VAGs, MGEs, sequence types, serotypes and conjugative elements in 29 phenotypically confirmed ESBL-producing and/or third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli isolates, obtained from patients attending primary healthcare units in Addis Ababa (n = 11) and Hossana (n = 18) using whole-genome sequencing.

2. Results

2.1. Phylogenetic Groups of E. coli Isolates

The E. coli isolates analyzed in this study belonged to seven phylogenetic groups. The predominant phylogenetic group was phylogroup B1 (n = 13; 44.8%), followed by phylogroup A (n = 9; 31.03%). The other phylogenetic groups identified in this study were phylogroup C and E (n = 2 each), phylogroup B2 (n = 1), phylogroup D (n = 1), and phylogroup G (n = 1) (Figure 1). Phylogroups B2, C, D, and G were obtained from both non-diarrheic and diarrheic patients from Hossana. These phylogroups were found in a slightly higher proportion (60%) among females, and except for one of the phylogroup C isolate, all of them were detected in the age groups of 5–9 and 20–45 years (Table 1).

2.2. Sequence Types of E. coli Isolates

Twenty-two different STs were identified, of which one was a novel sequence type designated as ST15980. The most frequently identified ST was ST10 (n = 4; 13.8%), followed by ST48, ST224, ST345, and ST410 (n = 2; 6.9% each). ST131 was also detected in this study in one E. coli isolate obtained from a non-diarrheic patient in Hossana. The novel ST was also among isolates from Hossana. Of the total STs identified, only ST10 and ST48 were detected in E. coli isolates from both Addis Ababa and Hossana (Figure 1 and Supplementary Table S1).

2.3. Serotypes of E. coli Isolates

A total of 23 different serotypes were recorded among the 29 E. coli isolates investigated in this study. Of the total number of tested isolates, 22 (75.8%) were typable for their O antigen and 28 (96.5%) for their H antigen, with 7 (24.1%) being ‘rough’ (lacking expression of the O antigen) and 1 (3.4%) lacking expression of the H antigen. The most frequently identified serotype was H30 (n = 3; 10.3%), followed by four serotypes, namely H34, O134:H53, O8:H21, and O9a:H30, each represented by two isolates (Figure 1). The serotype O153:H4 detected in this study was identified as ST131 (Supplementary Table S1).

2.4. Virulence-Associated Gene Profile of E. coli Isolates

A total of 72 different VAGs involved in adhesion (n = 23), protection against environmental stress and host immune response (n = 32), toxin production (n = 9), and in iron acquisition (n = 8) were identified in the E. coli isolates tested in this study. On average, all E. coli isolates carried 16 different VAGs, with a minimum of 7 and a maximum of 28 VAGs. The terC gene, which encodes for the tellurite resistance, and the nlpI gene, which encodes an outer membrane lipoprotein, were identified in all isolates tested. A total of 28 (96.6%) of the isolates contained yehC (chaperone, YhcD fimbrial cluster), 27 (93.1%) csgA (curlin major subunit CsgA), 26 (89.7%) hlyE (avian E. coli haemolysin), and 25 (86.2%) yehB (usher, YhcD fimbrial cluster). Forty-one of the total virulence-associated genes were detected in isolates from Hossana and Addis Ababa (Supplementary Table S1). Only seven genes, including the cdt-IIIB gene, which encodes the CdtB subunit of the cytolethal distending toxin complex, cib gene, which encodes a protein that protects E. coli cells from the cytotoxic effects of the cloacin DF13 bacteriocin, colE5 (colicin E5 lysis protein Lys), etsC (putative type I secretory outer membrane protein) and mcbA (bacteriocin microcin B17) were detected exclusively in isolates from Addis Ababa. However, 27 different genes, including capsular polysaccharide-related genes (kpsE, kpsMII, and kpsMII_K5), the tia gene that encodes the Tia (toxigenic invasion locus) protein, which is involved in the adherence and invasion of host epithelial cells, and the usp (uropathogenic specific protein), were exclusively detected in isolates from Hossana (Supplementary Table S1). The most frequently detected VAGs (greater than 10%) in E. coli isolates from Addis Ababa and Hossana are presented in Figure 2. The study found that 28 VAGs were detected in 18.2% to 100% of the E. coli isolates from Addis Ababa, while 36 VAGs were detected in 11.1% to 100% of the isolates from Hossana.
The afaB, afaC, afaE, and kpsMII_K5 genes were only found in the O153:H4 serotype. This serotype also possessed genes involved in the biosynthesis and uptake of yersiniabactin, aerobactin, and salmochelin siderophores. Seven VAGs (fimH, nlpI, terC, yehA, yehB, yehC and yehD) were detected in isolates from all phylogenetic groups. The afaB, afaC, afaE, and kpsMII_K5 genes were only detected in phylogroup B2 isolates. Fourteen genes, including usp, aslA, sigA, traT, hlyE, gad, chuA, cia, csgA, iha, ireA, iucC, iutA, and ompT, were detected in phylogroup G. The neuC gene, which encodes a polysialic acid capsule biosynthesis protein, the kpsMII gene, which encodes a polysialic acid transport protein group 2 capsule and the usp gene, which encodes a uropathogenic specific protein, were only detected in phylogroups C, D, and G, respectively. Twenty-eight different VAGs were detected in a single ST131 E. coli isolate, among them the sat gene, which encodes the serine protease autotransporters of Enterobacteriaceae (SPATE), and the senB gene, which encodes the plasmid-encoded enterotoxin (Supplementary Table S1).

2.5. Antimicrobial Resistance Genes

The distribution of ARGs among E. coli isolates is presented in Supplementary Table S2. ARGs were detected in 28 (96.6%) of E. coli isolates tested in this study. Thirty-one different horizontally transmitted acquired ARGs and ten chromosomal mutations in quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) were detected in E. coli isolates. Of the total E. coli isolates that carried ARGs, 19 (67.9%) had 5 or more different ARGs. The most prevalent ARGs detected were blaCTX-M-15 (n = 22 isolates), followed by blaTEM-1B (n = 15 isolates), and tet(A) (n = 14 isolates). The blaCTX-M-15 gene was identified in 78.9% of phenotypically confirmed ESBL-producing and 70% of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli. In total, 2 E. coli isolates from Hossana carried 14 different resistance genes encoding for resistance to antibiotics of different classes. Among third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli, 90% carried β-lactamase and quinolone resistance genes. In this study, the plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) determinants, such as qnrS1, aac(6)-Ib-cr, qepA1, qepA2, and qepA4, were detected. Among these, qnrS1 was the most predominant, being detected in 13 (44.8%) of the isolates. Mutations in the QRDR and PMQR genes co-existed in 5 (20%) of the E. coli isolates carrying genes that determine resistance to quinolones. Of the E. coli isolates tested, 48.3% had chromosomal mutations in gyrA, parC and/or parE, which are associated with resistance to quinolones—ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid. Double substitutions in gyrA (S83L + D87N) were observed in 8 (27.6%) of the E. coli isolates and these isolates also had an additional substitution in the parC (S80I) and parE (S458A) genes. Single amino acid substitutions, including S83L (n = 3), S83A (n = 1) and S83V (n = 1), were also observed in the gyrA gene. The substitutions at S80I (n = 6), E84K (n = 1), and A56T (n = 1) in parC, as well as S458A (n = 7), L416F (n = 1), and I529L (n = 1) in parE, were also observed (Table 2 and Supplementary Table S2).
This study found 7 E. coli serotypes (H30, O138:H48, O101:H10, O174:H28, O134:H53, O9a:H30, O8:H21) harboring 10 to 14 different ARGs. The predominant serotypes carrying the highest number (14) of ARGs were O9a:H30 and O8:H21. Furthermore, the E. coli isolates across all phylogenetic groups, with the exception of 1 from group B1, carried a range of ARGs, with groups A and B1 sharing 24 different ARGs. The analysis of sequence types revealed that ST224 and ST410 E. coli carried a high proportion of ARGs (Supplementary Table S2).

2.6. Co-Occurrence of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes

Several ARGs were detected together in most of the isolates in the current study. All E. coli isolates carrying at least one aminoglycoside antibiotic resistance gene were shown to carry β-lactam, quinolone, sulfonamide, and trimethoprim resistance genes simultaneously. E. coli isolates that carried at least one β-lactam antibiotic resistance gene also carried quinolone resistance genes and sulfonamide resistance genes in 89.3% and 75% of the cases, respectively. The β-lactam antibiotic resistance genes were also detected in 39.3% of E. coli isolates that carried at least one trimethoprim resistance gene, 32.1% of E. coli isolates that carried at least one macrolide resistance gene and 10.7% of E. coli isolates that carried at least one amphenicol resistance gene (Supplementary Table S2).

2.7. Plasmids and Other Mobile Genetic Elements

In this study, E. coli isolates were found to harbor diverse MGEs, including plasmids, insertion sequences (IS), integrative conjugative elements (ICEs), and transposons. A total of 86 MGEs were detected in the E. coli isolates. Among these, 26 were identified as plasmids, 50 as IS, and 6 as composite transposons and 2 as unit transposons. The remaining two were ICEs and miniature inverted repeats. Except for one isolate, all tested E. coli isolates were confirmed to carry one to eleven plasmids. The IncF plasmid was the most abundant plasmid in E. coli isolates, with different replicon types and replicon variants, including IncFII, IncFII(29), IncFIB(AP001918), IncFII(pRSB107), IncFII(pAMA1167-NDM-5), IncFII(pHN7A8), IncFII(pCoo), IncFIB(S), IncFIC(FII), IncFIA(HI1), IncFII(pSE11), IncFIA, and IncFIB(K). The isolates also carried other incompatibility group plasmids, including IncI1 (n = 11), IncI2 (n = 1), IncY (n = 9), IncX1 (n = 3), IncX3 (n = 1), and IncX4 (n = 2). The Col plasmids detected in the E. coli isolates in this study were Col156 (n = 7), Col(MG828) (n = 5), ColRNAI (n = 2), and Col(BS512) (n = 4). A total of 26 plasmids’ combination patterns were detected in E. coli isolates. Nine isolates carried two plasmids, while four isolates carried three plasmids. Nine isolates carried four or more plasmids, while a single isolate obtained from patient at Hossana carried eleven plasmids (Figure 3).
A total of 24 different plasmids were detected in E. coli isolates carrying genes resistant to quinolones, while 22 plasmids were detected in E. coli isolates carrying genes resistant to antibiotics of the aminoglycoside class. The IncI2 plasmid was detected only in E. coli isolates harboring genes with resistance to the quinolones, whereas the IncHI1A and IncHI1B(CIT) plasmids were detected only in E. coli isolates harboring genes with resistance to the β-lactams. The dominant plasmid detected in all classes of antibiotic resistance gene-carrying E. coli was the IncFIB(AP001918) plasmid type.
Similar to plasmids, the E. coli isolates also carried several IS elements, miniature inverted repeats, integrative conjugative elements, and transposons. At least four MGEs, other than plasmids, were detected. The MITEEc1 was found in all tested E. coli isolates. A total of fifty different IS elements belonging to twenty-one IS families were identified. The most abundant IS family was IS3, followed by ISAs1 and IS630. The most prevalent IS elements were ISEc1 and IS609, detected in 72.4% and 58.6% of all E. coli isolates, respectively. Additionally, ISEc38, IS26, and ISEc9 were found in 37.9%, 34.5%, and 34.5% of the isolates, respectively. Isolates carrying twelve different MGEs were the most predominant (14.8%), followed by isolates carrying seven, eight, eleven, and thirteen different MGEs (11.1%) each. Notably, 1 E. coli isolate carried 17 different MGEs, while 15 isolates carried 10 to 17 MGEs (Figure 4 and Supplementary Table S3). There was a significant association between genes determining resistance to aminoglycosides and the presence of IS3 (Fisher exact p = 0.01), IS5075 (Fisher exact p = 0.01) and IS629 (X2 = 4.821, p = 0.028). Similarly, a significant association was observed between genes determining β-lactam resistance and ISEc31 (Fisher exact p = 0.016), ISEc9 (Fisher exact p = 0.048), and ISSfl8 (Fisher exact p = 0.015). In addition, resistance to quinolones was significantly associated with the presence of ISEc9 (Fisher exact p = 0.001) and ISKpn19 (Fisher exact p = 0.003).

2.8. Determination of Conjugative Transferable Elements

Of the 29 E. coli isolates tested, 22 (75.9%) had all the essential components necessary for conjugation, such as oriTs, relaxases, T4CPs, and T4SSs, indicating their potential for self-transferability. Fourteen (63.6%) of the E. coli isolates with conjugative transferable elements were obtained from eight diarrheic patients and six non-diarrheic patients in Hossana, while the remaining eight (three from diarrheic and five from non-diarrheic) were obtained from Addis Ababa. Four (13.8%) of the E. coli isolates were found not to carry oriT, whereas relaxases were not detected in three (10.3%) isolates. Only T4CP was detected in one E. coli isolate; oriT, relaxase, and T4SS were absent. Two (6.9%) isolates had both oriT and T4CP, but no relaxase and/or T4SS. Twenty-one (95.4%) E. coli with conjugative transferable elements had acquired ARGs. Virulence-associated genes were detected in all E. coli isolates with self-transferable and non-self-transferable MGEs.

3. Discussion

E. coli is an extremely diverse bacterial species in which only about 6% of the genes are shared by all strains. The remaining genes, accounting for more than 90%, are variable “accessory genes” that are differentially present in the various E. coli strains [17]. The results of the study revealed a high level of genetic diversity among the E. coli isolates, which were classified into seven distinct phylogenetic groups. The findings showed that 82.8% of the E. coli isolates belonged to phylogroups A, B1, and C, which are generally regarded as phylogenetic groups in which most intestinal pathogenic E. coli strains are found in humans [18]. Of all the phylogenetic groups, B1 was the predominant one. This is consistent with previous findings from southwestern Nigeria [19]. In contrast, a study conducted in South Africa among diarrheic children confirmed that a predominant strain characterized by increased virulence and the ability to cause a wide range of infections belonged to phylogroup B2 [20]. The differences can be explained by health, diet and environmental, social, and geographical conditions [21]. The phylogroup B2 E. coli strain identified in our study belonged to the ST131. In addition, phylogroup G, which is known to contain highly virulent and AMR strains, was also detected in the current study [22], which implies a higher likelihood of severe and invasive E. coli infections.
In the current study, the E. coli isolates showed 22 different STs. One of them was a novel ST designated as ST15980, which was isolated from a non-diarrheic patient in Hossana. This isolate showed a broader spectrum of resistance to antimicrobials. The isolate carried resistance genes (aph(6)-Id, aph(3)-Ib, blaCTX-M-15, blaTEM-1B, qnrS1, sul2, dfrA14) conferring resistance to aminoglycosides, β-lactams, quinolones, sulfonamides, and trimethoprim, which complicates treatment with a wide range of common antibiotics and poses a serious health problem. This isolate also typically carried plasmids from incompatibility groups (IncI1, IncY) and other MGEs such as (IS26, IS30, ISEc38), which often harbor genes conferring resistance to various antibiotics and have the ability to be efficiently transferred between bacterial cells [23]. Many VAGs have also been detected in ST15980, enabling it to adhere to host tissues and cells, evade the host immune system, and cause tissue damage. These include hlyF, the gene encoding hemolysin, which may be associated with increased production of outer membrane vesicles and contributes to the release of cytolethal distending toxin and other chemicals [24]; and the terC gene, which encodes a subunit of the tellurite resistance protein complex, which may contribute to its fitness and allow it to evade the host’s primary immune response [25], making the strain more virulent and resistant to immune defense.
The prominent ST131, which is a highly virulent and extensively antimicrobial-resistant strain that has spread explosively throughout the world [26], was also found in our study. It is known to cause extraintestinal infections, including urinary tract and bloodstream infections [17]. The ST131 isolated in this study carried 28 VAGs, including afa (Dr binding adhesins), iutA (aerobactin receptor), and kpsMT II (group 2 capsule synthesis), which are characteristic of extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) [18], demonstrating its ability to colonize and persist in the intestine, as confirmed by other studies [19]. Additionally, this isolate contained several genes, including sat (secreted autotransporter toxin), fimH (type 1 fimbriae), fyuA (yersiniabactin receptor), iha (adhesin siderophore receptor), ompT (outer membrane receptor) iucC (aerobactin), iutA (aerobactin receptor), and tratT (serum resistance associated), that are frequently found in E. coli ST131 isolates. Studies have indicated the growing prevalence and spread of the ST131 clonal group in various African countries. In Malawi, a genomic epidemiology study at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, a tertiary care center and referral hospital in Lilongwe, found ST131 in 14.9% and 32.8% of the E. coli isolates sequenced, respectively [27,28]. Additionally, a study conducted in South Africa found that 18% of E. coli isolated from urinary tract infections in inpatients and outpatients belonged to ST131 [29]. Furthermore, a study found that ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from Tanzania and Uganda belonged to the ST131 strain, accounting for 8.4% and 2.9% of isolates, respectively [30]. Considering the increased prevalence and pandemic nature of the ST131 strain, which poses a significant threat to public health, due attention should be given to prevent and control its dissemination.
A high degree of diversity was observed in the E. coli population with 23 different serotypes. The predominant E. coli serotype was H30, which showed increased resistance to different classes of antibiotics. They harbored a plasmid encoding the blaCTX-M-15 gene, one of the most widespread and predominant ESBL-encoding genes [31]. They also carried genes that determine resistance to aminoglycosides, quinolones, sulfonamides, trimethoprim, tetracyclines, macrolides, and amphenicols. The result also showed that this serotype harbors different groups of plasmids and MGEs containing genes for various VAGs encoding protectins, iron acquisition, cytotoxins, or adhesion factors [32]. The high diversity of ARGs and VAGs and their distribution among various serotypes and STs suggest multiple sources of resistant and virulent bacteria and the flow of these genes between different bacterial populations [33].
Antimicrobial resistance is one of the greatest global threats to public health. The fundamental reason why some bacteria are able to resist the effects of antibiotics is that they have specific genes that code for resistance mechanisms [34]. The resistance genes were detected in 96.6% of the E. coli isolates tested in this study. This rate is comparable to a previous report in which resistance genes were found in 84.9% of E. coli isolates from humans in the Central Zambia region [35]. However, a lower rate (38%) of ARGs was detected in E. coli isolates obtained from human samples in a systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in South Africa [36]. Bioinformatic analysis of the whole-genome sequence of the isolate (MBL protocol number 181) that was found to be phenotypically resistant to ampicillin, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole did not reveal any ARGs, indicating that this isolate might possess a not yet identified ARG. Another possible explanation could be that the MGE carrying the ARG conferring this specific resistance phenotype was lost in sub-culturing the E. coli isolates.
E. coli has developed various mechanisms to resist the effects of antibiotics. In many cases, a single strain of E. coli can carry ARGs that confer resistance to different classes of antibiotics [37]. This ability significantly complicates the treatment of E. coli infections, as clinicians have fewer effective antibiotic options to choose from [38]. The current study found a high co-detection rate of multiple ARGs within the E. coli isolates tested. For example, all the isolates carrying aminoglycoside resistance genes were also confirmed to harbor resistance genes for β-lactams, quinolones, sulfonamides, and trimethoprim. Many of the detected resistance genes, including those encoding aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs), β-lactamases, and determinants of quinolone resistance, sulfonamides, trimethoprim, and tetracyclines resistance, are often located on MGEs [39,40,41]. Furthermore, plasmids belonging to different incompatibility groups, and other MGEs, which have an important role in the transmission of ARGs, were simultaneously detected in the isolates in the current study. This observation suggests that the diverse MGEs may have the capacity to disseminate different antibiotic classes, further exacerbating the problem of multi-drug-resistant E. coli infections and the need to target plasmids to limit acquisition and transmission of antimicrobial resistance, as already reviewed by Vrancianu et al. [42].
Approximately 75.9% of plasmids were found to be self-transferable, possessing key genetic elements such as oriTs, relaxases, T4CPs, and T4SSs. This high proportion of self-transferable plasmids indicates their substantial potential for self-transfer and dissemination within bacterial populations. Additionally, it was observed that 95.4% of the conjugative plasmids examined were found to carry acquired ARGs. This suggests that these conjugative plasmids have the capacity to potentially spread and disseminate ARGs among different bacterial species, which poses a significant concern in the context of antimicrobial resistance.
The main limitation of this study was the inability to conclusively determine whether ARGs were plasmid-encoded or chromosomally located. This technical limitation restricts the understanding of the genetic mechanisms underlying the observed multi-drug resistance. Further investigations employing advanced sequencing techniques would be needed to address these limitations and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the antimicrobial resistance landscape in the region.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. E. coli Isolates

The current study is a continuation of a previous cross-sectional study conducted in Addis Ababa and Hossana from October 2021 to September 2022, in which 260 E. coli strains were isolated from patients of all ages and sexes recruited according to patient flow from 13 randomly selected health centers from 4 sub-cities (40% of the total) in Addis Ababa and all 4 health centers in Hossana [43]. For the current study, all E. coli isolates that showed phenotypic resistance to third-generation cephalosporin antibiotics or were identified as ESBL-producing were selected from the previous collection, because E. coli isolates exhibiting these characteristics are critically important for human medicine. The sampling method used in the current study is shown in Figure 5.

4.2. DNA Extraction, Whole-Genome Sequencing, Raw Data Pre-Processing, De Novo Assembly, and Quality Control

Twelve selected isolates exhibiting phenotypic resistance to third-generation cephalosporins were subjected to whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Genomic DNA extraction, WGS, raw data pre-processing, de novo assembly and quality control was performed as previously described for the 19 ESBL-producing isolates possessing ESBL genes [43]. The whole-genome sequence data of the two sequenced third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli isolates did not pass the preliminary quality assessment criteria and were excluded in further bioinformatic analysis.

4.3. Bioinformatics Analysis

The ClermonTyping tool available at http://clermontyping.iame-research.center/ (accessed on 7 June 2024) was used to determine the phylogenetic groups of E. coli isolates [44]. Sequence typing was performed based on the seven gene Achtman scheme using the website https://pubmlst.org/ (accessed on 7 June 2024) [45] and EnteroBase https://enterobase.warwick.ac.uk/ (accessed on 27 June 2024) [46]. The detection of E. coli virulence-associated genes and serotypes was performed using VirulenceFinder 2.0 and SerotypeFinder available at www.genomicepidemiology.org (accessed on 5 June 2024) with the default parameters [47,48]. In addition, the acquired antimicrobial resistance genes as well as chromosomal point mutations causing resistance were determined using ResFinder 4.0, available at http://genepi.food.dtu.dk/resfinder (accessed on 5 June 2024), with default parameters [49]. Plasmid replicon was identified to infer plasmid presence using PlasmidFinder 2.1, available at https://cge.food.dtu.dk/services/PlasmidFinder/ (accessed on 15 June 2024), with minimum identity of 95% and minimum coverage of 60% [50]. Integrated mobile genetic elements were predicted in the assembled genomes using MobileElementFinder version 1.0 with MGEdb v1.0.2, available at https://cge.food.dtu.dk/services/MobileElementFinder/ (accessed on 15 June 2024) [51].

4.4. Statistical Analysis

The data were captured in Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS software (Version 25. IBM SPSS Inc., New York, NY, USA). Descriptive analyses using frequency and percentages were used to summarize the variables. The chi-square or Fisher exact test was used to assess the association between ARGs and MGEs in E. coli isolates. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

The overall finding of the current study showed the high genetic diversity of ESBL-producing and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli in patients from the two study areas. The observed diversity in the ARGs and MGEs among different STs and serotypes suggests the possible exchange of genes amongst different isolates, posing a significant challenge to infection control and to effectively treating infections. Additionally, a high proportion of self-transferable conjugative elements suggests a significant potential for horizontal gene transfer, with implications for the spread of clinically important traits, such as virulence and antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, the findings from this study highlight the pressing need for comprehensive strategies to address the challenge of AMR in the study area. In the future, based on the findings of this study, enhanced surveillance covering a large geographic area with a representative number of samples in collaboration with various stakeholders and sectors will be proposed to address this growing public health challenge. Implementation of strategies to reduce the spread of ARGs and VAGs is necessary to address this public health threat.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics13090851/s1, Supplementary Table S1: VAGs detected in E. coli isolates; Supplementary Table S2: ARGs detected in E. coli isolates; Supplementary Table S3: MGEs detected in E. coli isolates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.W., M.P., J.A. and M.S.E.; methodology, D.W., K.S.S., J.A., M.P., T.C.K. and D.K.; software, D.W., G.M., T.C.K., T.J., A.S. and M.S.E.; validation, T.E. and M.S.E.; formal analysis, D.W., K.S.S., T.C.K. and M.S.E.; investigation, D.W., M.P., K.S.S., J.A., D.K., T.C.K., T.J. and A.S.; resources, M.P., J.A., A.S. and M.S.E.; data curation, D.W., A.F.H., H.A., A.M., K.S.S., J.A., D.K., T.C.K., T.J., A.S. and M.S.E.; writing—original draft preparation, D.W.; writing—review and editing, D.W., T.E., G.M., A.F.H., H.A., A.M., M.P., K.S.S., J.A., D.K., T.C.K., T.J., A.S. and M.S.E.; visualization, D.W., T.C.K. and M.S.E.; supervision, T.E., A.F.H., G.M, A.M. and M.S.E.; project administration, M.S.E.; funding acquisition, M.S.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially supported by Addis Ababa University through the thematic research project and by the Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (research core funding no. P4-0092 ‘Animal health, environment and food safety’; no. P1-0198 ‘Molecular biology of microorganisms; no. P3-0083 ‘Host-parasite relationship’; and the APC was funded by P1-0198). D.W. was a grant recipient from the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of ALIPB, AAU (protocol code ALIPB IRB/66/2013/21 and date of approval 19 August 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The generated sequencing raw data and assembled genomes were submitted to SRA—Sequence Read Archive (accession number: PRJNA1105046, URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1105046, accessed on 10 May 2024).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Marko Kolenc from the Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ljubljana and Tom Koritnik from the National Laboratory of Health, Environment, and Food, Ljubljana, Slovenia for their assistance in DNA extraction and sequencing isolates, respectively. The authors are also thankful to Nigel Dyer, research fellow, Bioinformatics Research Technology Platform, University of Warwick (EnteroBase), for his support in defining a new sequence type detected in our study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Walsh, T.R.; Gales, A.C.; Laxminarayan, R.; Dodd, P.C. Antimicrobial resistance: Addressing a global threat to humanity. PLos Med. 2023, 20, e1004264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Porooshat, D. Antimicrobial Resistance: Implications and costs. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 3903–3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ohemu, G.P. Starved of ACTION: A critical look at the antimicrobial resistance action plans of African countries. ACS Infect. Dis. 2022, 8, 1377–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Poirel, L.; Madec, J.-Y.; Lupo, A.; Schink, A.-K.; Skieffer, N.; Nordmann, P.; Schwarz, S. Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Spectr. 2018, 6, ARBA-0026-2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. WHO Africa. Addressing the challenge of antimicrobial resistance in Ethiopia. 2023. Available online: https://www.afro.who.int/photo-story/addressing-challenge-antimicrobial-resistance-ethiopia (accessed on 14 June 2024).
  6. World Health Organization. Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine: Ranking of Medically Important Antimicrobials for Risk Management of Antimicrobial Resistance due to Non-Human Use, 6th ed.; World Health Organ: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. de Been, M.; Lanza, V.F.; de Toro, M.; Scharringa, J.; Dohmen, W.; Du, Y.; Hu, J.; Lei, Y.; Li, N.; Tooming-Klunderud, A.; et al. Dissemination of cephalosporin resistance genes between Escherichia coli Strains from farm animals and humans by specific plasmid lineages. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Jariremombe, R.C. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance of E. coli. In Escherichia coli—Old New Insights; Starčič Erjavec, M., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2022; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bush, K. Past and present perspectives on β-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e01076-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nørgaard, S.M.; Jensen, C.S.; Aalestrup, J.; Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C.M.J.E.; De Boer, M.G.J.; Pedersen, A.B. Choice of therapeutic interventions and outcomes for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens: A systematic review. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2019, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huddleston, J.R. Horizontal gene transfer in the human gastrointestinal tract: Potential spread of antibiotic resistance genes. Infect. Drug Resist. 2014, 7, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Partridge, S.R.; Kwong, S.M.; Firth, N.; Jensen, S.O. Mobile genetic elements associated with antimicrobial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 31, e00088-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Leekitcharoenphon, P.; Hans, M.; Johansson, K.; Munk, P.; Malorny, B.; Skarżyńska, M.; Wadepohl, K.; Moyano, G.; Hesp, A.; Veldman, K.T.; et al. Genomic evolution of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wozniak, R.A.F.; Waldor, M.K. Integrative and conjugative elements: Mosaic mobile genetic elements enabling dynamic lateral gene flow. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 552–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Virolle, C.; Goldlust, K.; Djermoun, S.; Bigot, S.; Lesterlin, C. Plasmid transfer by conjugation in gram-negative bacteria: From the cellular to the community level. Genes 2020, 11, 1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Burrus, V. Mechanisms of stabilization of integrative and conjugative elements. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017, 38, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lukjancenko, O.; Wassenaar, T.M.; Ussery, D.W. Comparison of 61 sequenced Escherichia coli Genomes. Microb. Ecol. 2010, 60, 708–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Picard, B.; Garcia, J.S.; Gouriou, S.; Duriez, P.; Brahimi, N.; Bingen, E.; Elion, J.; Denamur, E. The link between phylogeny and virulence in Escherichia coli extraintestinal infection. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Olowe, O.A.; Adefioye, O.J.; Ajayeoba, T.A.; Schiebel, J.; Weinreich, J.; Ali, A.; Burdukiewicz, M.; Rödiger, S.; Schierack, P. Phylogenetic grouping and biofilm formation of multidrug resistant Escherichia coli isolates from humans, animals and food products in South-West Nigeria. Sci. Afr. 2019, 6, e00158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alfinete, N.W.; Bolukaoto, J.Y.; Heine, L.; Potgieter, N.; Barnard, T.G. Virulence and phylogenetic analysis of enteric pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from children with diarrhoea in South Africa. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2022, 114, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Escobar-Páramo, P.; Grenet, K.; Le Menac’h, A.; Rode, L.; Salgado, E.; Amorin, C.; Gouriou, S.; Picard, B.; Rahimy, M.C.; Andremont, A.; et al. Large-scale population structure of human commensal Escherichia coli isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 5698–5700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Clermont, O.; Dixit, O.V.A.; Vangchhia, B.; Condamine, B.; Dion, S.; Bridier-Nahmias, A.; Denamur, E.; Gordon, D. Characterization and rapid identification of phylogroup G in Escherichia coli, a lineage with high virulence and antibiotic resistance potential. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 21, 3107–3117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Foley, S.L.; Kaldhone, P.R.; Ricke, S.C.; Han, J. Incompatibility Group I1 (IncI1) Plasmids: Their Genetics, Biology, and Public Health Relevance. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2021, 85, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Murase, K.; Martin, P.; Porcheron, G.; Houle, S.; Helloin, E.; Pénary, M.; Nougayrède, J.-P.; Dozois, C.M.; Hayashi, T.; Oswald, E. HlyF produced by extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli is a virulence factor that regulates outer membrane vesicle biogenesis. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 212, 856–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Valková, D.; Valkovičová, L.; Vávrová, S.; Kováčová, E.; Mravec, J.; Turňa, J. The contribution of tellurite resistance genes to the fitness of Escherichia coli uropathogenic strains. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2007, 2, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pitout, J.D.D.; DeVinney, R. Escherichia coli ST131: A multidrug-resistant clone primed for global domination. F1000Research 2017, 6, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Musicha, P.; Feasey, N.A.; Cain, A.K.; Kallonen, T.; Chaguza, C.; Peno, C.; Khonga, M.; Thompson, S.; Gray, K.J.; Mather, A.E.; et al. Genomic landscape of extended-spectrum β-lactamase resistance in Escherichia coli from an urban African setting. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 1602–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tegha, G.; Ciccone, E.J.; Krysiak, R.; Kaphatika, J.; Chikaonda, T.; Ndhlovu, I.; van Duin, D.; Hoffman, I.; Juliano, J.J.; Wang, J. Genomic epidemiology of Escherichia coli isolates from a tertiary referral center in lilongwe, Malawi. Microb. Genomics 2021, 7, 000490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hoog, K.J. Molecular Epidemiology of Escherichia coli Isolated from Urinary Tract Infections in Inpatients and Outpatients in Gauteng, South Africa. Master’s Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sserwadda, I.; Kidenya, B.R.; Kanyerezi, S.; Akaro, I.L.; Mkinze, B.; Mshana, S.E.; Hashim, S.O.; Isoe, E.; Seni, J.; Joloba, M.L.; et al. Unraveling virulence determinants in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli from East Africa using whole-genome sequencing. BMC Infect. Dis. 2023, 23, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bevan, E.R.; Jones, A.M.; Hawkey, P.M. Global epidemiology of CTX-M β-lactamases: Temporal and geographical shifts in genotype. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 2145–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pitout, J.D.D.; Chen, L. The significance of epidemic plasmids in the Success of multidrug-resistant drug pandemic extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2023, 12, 1029–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Katale, B.Z.; Misinzo, G.; Mshana, S.E.; Chiyangi, H.; Campino, S.; Clark, T.G.; Good, L.; Rweyemamu, M.M.; Matee, M.I. Genetic diversity and risk factors for the transmission of antimicrobial resistance across human, animals and environmental compartments in East Africa: A review. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2020, 9, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jian, Z.; Zeng, L.; Xu, T.; Sun, S.; Yan, S.; Yang, L.; Huang, Y.; Jia, J.; Dou, T. Antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria: Occurrence, spread, and control. J. Basic. Microbiol. 2021, 61, 1049–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mainda, G.; Lupolova, N.; Sikakwa, L.; Richardson, E.; Bessell, P.R.; Malama, S.K.; Kwenda, G.; Stevens, M.P.; Bronsvoort, B.M.D.; Muma, J.B.; et al. Whole genome sequence analysis reveals lower diversity and frequency of acquired antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes in E. coli from dairy herds compared with human isolates from the same region of central Zambia. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ramatla, T.; Tawana, M.; Lekota, K.E.; Thekisoe, O. Antimicrobial resistance genes of Escherichia coli, a bacterium of “One Health” importance in South Africa: Systematic review and meta-analysis. AIMS Microbiol. 2023, 9, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Galindo-Méndez, M. Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli. In E. coli Infections—Importance of Early Diagnosis and Effictive Treatment; Rodrigo, L., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020; pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Barlow, G. Clinical challenges in antimicrobial resistance. Nat. Microbiol. 2018, 3, 258–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rozwandowicz, M.; Brouwer, M.S.M.; Fischer, J.; Wagenaar, J.A.; Guerra, B.; Mevius, D.J. Plasmids carrying antimicrobial resistance genes in Enterobacteriaceae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 1121–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tansirichaiya, S.; Goodman, R.N.; Guo, X.; Bulgasim, I.; Samuelsen, Ø.; Al-Haroni, M.; Roberts, A.P. Intracellular transposition and capture of mobile genetic elements following intercellular conjugation of multidrug resistance conjugative plasmids from clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0214021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Snaith, A.E.; Dunn, S.J.; Moran, R.A.; Newton, P.N.; Dance, D.A.B.; Davong, V.; Kuenzli, E.; Kantele, A.; Corander, J.; McNally, A. The highly diverse plasmid population found in Escherichia coli colonizing travellers to Laos and its role in antimicrobial resistance gene carriage. Microb. Genomics 2023, 9, 001000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vrancianu, C.O.; Popa, L.I.; Bleotu, C.; Chifiriuc, M.C. Targeting plasmids to limit acquisition and transmission of antimicrobial resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wolde, D.; Eguale, T.; Alemayehu, H.; Medhin, G.; Haile, A.F.; Pirs, M.; Strašek Smrdel, K.; Avberšek, J.; Kušar, D.; Cerar Kišek, T.; et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility and characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolated from stools of primary healthcare patients in Ethiopia. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Beghain, J.; Bridier-Nahmias, A.; Nagard HLe Denamur, E.; Clermont, O. ClermonTyping: An easy-to-use and accurate in silico method for Escherichia genus strain phylotyping. Microb. Genomics 2018, 4, e000192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jolley, K.A.; Bray, J.E.; Maiden, M.C.J. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res. 2018, 3, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhou, Z.; Alikhan, N.; Mohamed, K.; Fan, Y.; Group, S.; Achtman, M. The EnteroBase user’s guide, with case studies on Salmonella transmissions, Yersinia pestis phylogeny, and Escherichia core genomic diversity. Genome Res. 2020, 30, 138–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Joensen, K.G.; Scheutz, F.; Lund, O.; Hasman, H.; Kaas, R.S.; Nielsen, E.M.; Aarestrup, F.M. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for routine typing, surveillance, and outbreak detection of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 1501–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Joensen, K.G.; Tetzschner, A.M.M.; Iguchi, A.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Scheutz, F. Rapid and easy in silico serotyping of Escherichia coli isolates by use of whole-genome sequencing data. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 2410–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bortolaia, V.; Kaas, R.S.; Ruppe, E.; Roberts, M.C.; Schwarz, S.; Cattoir, V.; Philippon, A.; Allesoe, R.L.; Rebelo, A.R.; Florensa, A.F.; et al. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3491–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Carattoli, A.; Zankari, E.; Garciá-Fernández, A.; Larsen, M.V.; Lund, O.; Villa, L.; Møller Aarestrup, F.; Hasman, H. In Silico detection and typing of plasmids using plasmidfinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3895–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Johansson, M.H.K.; Bortolaia, V.; Tansirichaiya, S.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Roberts, A.P.; Petersen, T.N. Detection of mobile genetic elements associated with antibiotic resistance in Salmonella enterica using a newly developed web tool: MobileElementFinder. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 76, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogroups, sequence types, and serotypes of studied E. coli isolates.
Figure 1. Phylogroups, sequence types, and serotypes of studied E. coli isolates.
Antibiotics 13 00851 g001
Figure 2. Virulence-associated genes detected with prevalence greater than 10% in studied E. coli isolates from Addis Ababa and Hossana.
Figure 2. Virulence-associated genes detected with prevalence greater than 10% in studied E. coli isolates from Addis Ababa and Hossana.
Antibiotics 13 00851 g002
Figure 3. Number of studied E. coli isolates harboring certain plasmid types.
Figure 3. Number of studied E. coli isolates harboring certain plasmid types.
Antibiotics 13 00851 g003
Figure 4. Number of studied E. coli isolates harboring certain types of transposable elements.
Figure 4. Number of studied E. coli isolates harboring certain types of transposable elements.
Antibiotics 13 00851 g004
Figure 5. Flow diagram showing the selection of E. coli isolates for the study.
Figure 5. Flow diagram showing the selection of E. coli isolates for the study.
Antibiotics 13 00851 g005
Table 1. Distribution of different E. coli phylogenetic groups among patients from study sites and their relations with other patients’ characteristics.
Table 1. Distribution of different E. coli phylogenetic groups among patients from study sites and their relations with other patients’ characteristics.
CharacteristicsPhylogroup (N = 29)
A
N (%)
B1
N (%)
B2
N (%)
C
N (%)
D
N (%)
E
N (%)
G
N (%)
Study site
 Addis Ababa (n = 11) 7 (63.6)3 (27.3)0001 (9.1)0
 Hossana (n = 18)2 (11.1)10 (55.6)1 (5.6)2 (11.1)1 (5.6)1 (5.6)1 (5.6)
Sex
 Female (n = 13) 3 (23.1)6 (46.2)1 (7.7)1 (7.7)1 (7.7)1 (7.7)0
 Male (n = 16)6 (37.5)7 (43.7)01 (6.3)01 (6.3)1 (6.3)
Participants 1 (3.7)
 Diarrheic (n = 13) 3 (23.1)7 (53.8)01 (7.7)1 (7.7)1 (7.7)0
 Non-diarrheic (n = 16)6 (35.7)6 (35.7)1 (6.3)1 (6.3)01 (6.3)1 (6.3)
Age groups
 0–4 (n = 1)0001 (100)000
 5–9 (n = 6)2 (33.3)2 (33.3)001 (16.7)01 (16.7)
 10–14 (n = 3)1 (66.7)2 (66.7)00000
 15–19 (n = 2)1 (50)1 (50)00000
 20–45 (n = 14)5 (35.7)5 (35.7)1 (7.1)1 (7.1)02 (14.3)0
 46–65 (n = 3)03 (100)00000
Table 2. Distribution of antimicrobial resistance genes and chromosomal mutations among studied E. coli isolates.
Table 2. Distribution of antimicrobial resistance genes and chromosomal mutations among studied E. coli isolates.
Antimicrobial ClassAntimicrobial Resistance Genes/Mutations DetectedNo (%) of ESBL-Producing Isolates Possessing the Gene/Mutation (n = 19)No (%) of 3rd-Generation-Cephalosporin-Resistant Isolates Possessing the Gene/Mutation (n = 10)Total No (%) of Isolates Possessing the Gene/Mutation (n = 29)
β-lactamsblaCTX-M-1515 (78.9)7 (70)22 (75.9)
blaCTX-M-34 (21.1)04 (13.8)
blaTEM-1B10 (52.6)5 (50)15 (51.7)
blaTEM-1692 (10.5)02 (6.9)
blaTEM-332 (10.5)02 (6.9)
blaSHV-1201 (10)1 (3.4)
blaOXA-11 (5.3) 1 (10)2 (6.9)
Aminoglycosidesaph(6)-Id8 (42.1)3 (30)11 (37.9)
aph(3″)-Ib8 (42.1) 3 (30) 11 (37.9)
aac(6′)-Ib-cr1 (5.3) 1 (10)2 (6.9)
aac(3)-IId2 (10.5)02 (6.9)
aadA12 (10.5)02 (6.9)
aadA25 (26.3) 05 (17.2)
aadA52 (10.5)2 (20)4 (13.8)
Quinolones qnrS18 (42.1) 5 (50)13 (44.8)
qepA101 (10)1 (3.4)
qepA201 (10)1 (3.4)
qepA41 (5.3) 1 (10)2 (6.9)
gyrA:p.S83L7 (36.8)4 (40)11 (37.9)
gyrA:p.D87N5 (26.3)3 (30) 8 (27.6)
gyrA:p.S83A1 (5.3)01 (3.4)
gyrA:p.S83V1 (5.3)01 (3.4)
parC:p.S80I5 (26.3)2 (20)7 (24.1)
parC:p.E84K01 (10)1 (3.4)
parC:p.A56T1 (5.3)01 (3.4)
parE:p.S458A5 (26.3)2 (20)7 (24.1)
parE:p.L416F01 (10)1 (3.4)
parE:p.I529L01 (10)1 (3.4)
Sulfonamides sul17 (36.8)3 (30)10 (34.4)
sul28 (42.1)3 (30)11 (37.9)
Trimethoprim dfrA12 (10.5)02 (6.9)
dfrA125 (26.3)05 (17.2)
dfrA144 (21.1) 2 (20)6 (20.7)
dfrA172 (10.5)2 (20)4 (13.8)
dfrB401 (10)1 (3.4)
Tetracyclines tet(A)9 (47.4)5 (50)14 (48.3)
tet(B)4 (21.1)1 (10)5 (17.2)
Macrolides mph(A)5 (26.3)2 (20)7 (24.1)
erm(B) 1 (5.3)2 (20)3 (10.3)
Amphenicols catA12 (10.5) 1 (10)3 (10.3)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wolde, D.; Eguale, T.; Medhin, G.; Haile, A.F.; Alemayehu, H.; Mihret, A.; Pirs, M.; Strašek Smrdel, K.; Avberšek, J.; Kušar, D.; et al. Genomic Characterization of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing and Third-Generation Cephalosporin-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolated from Stools of Primary Healthcare Patients in Ethiopia. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 851. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13090851

AMA Style

Wolde D, Eguale T, Medhin G, Haile AF, Alemayehu H, Mihret A, Pirs M, Strašek Smrdel K, Avberšek J, Kušar D, et al. Genomic Characterization of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing and Third-Generation Cephalosporin-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolated from Stools of Primary Healthcare Patients in Ethiopia. Antibiotics. 2024; 13(9):851. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13090851

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wolde, Deneke, Tadesse Eguale, Girmay Medhin, Aklilu Feleke Haile, Haile Alemayehu, Adane Mihret, Mateja Pirs, Katja Strašek Smrdel, Jana Avberšek, Darja Kušar, and et al. 2024. "Genomic Characterization of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing and Third-Generation Cephalosporin-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolated from Stools of Primary Healthcare Patients in Ethiopia" Antibiotics 13, no. 9: 851. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13090851

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop