Next Article in Journal
Impact of Amoxicillin Shortage on Pediatric Antibiotic Prescriptions in Primary Care
Previous Article in Journal
The Cyclic Antimicrobial Peptide C-LR18 Has Enhanced Antibacterial Activity, Improved Stability, and a Longer Half-Life Compared to the Original Peptide
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Technical Note

ICD-10 Codes to Identify Adverse Drug Events Associated with Antibiotics in Administrative Data

1
BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4, Canada
2
Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
3
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
4
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z7, Canada
5
School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
6
Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work (co-first).
These authors contributed equally to this work (co-last).
Antibiotics 2025, 14(3), 314; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14030314
Submission received: 14 January 2025 / Revised: 26 February 2025 / Accepted: 3 March 2025 / Published: 18 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Antibiotics Use and Antimicrobial Stewardship)

Abstract

:
Antibiotics are among the most used therapeutics in primary care, and while their benefits are clear, the potential harms related to adverse drug events (ADEs) cannot be ignored. We outline the creation of a comprehensive list of diagnostic codes describing antibiotic-associated ADEs resulting in presentations to acute care hospitals. Methods: Previously published ADE codes were used to link BC hospitalizations to prior outpatient antibiotic prescriptions and were restricted based on whether patients received an antibiotic within a month prior to the ADE-related hospitalization. The code list was reviewed by two clinical experts independently for the likelihood of being antibiotic-associated. The inter-rater reliability was calculated using Kappa scores with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Of the 695 ICD-10 ADE codes with evidence of recent antibiotic administration, 72, 68, and 555 codes were considered likely, possibly, and unlikely antibiotic-associated, respectively. Conclusions: We outline a methodology for developing an ICD-10 code list for antibiotic-associated ADEs severe enough to warrant hospital admission. This will help to improve the use of administrative data to capture antibiotic-associated ADEs.

1. Introduction

Outpatient antibiotic use is common, but may confer health risks that compromise its therapeutic benefits, including allergic reactions (i.e., anaphylaxis and skin rash), disruption of the gut microbiome (i.e., Clostridioides difficile infection) and drug interactions [1,2,3]. Adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with outpatient antimicrobial medications are responsible for more than 280,000 patient visits to emergency departments and 26,000 admissions across Canada per year, resulting in over USD $400 M in annual healthcare expenditures [4,5,6,7,8]. These costs do not take into account the additional burden of antibiotic-resistant infections and attributable deaths. The Council of Canadian Academies reported that in 2018, 26% of the approximately 1 million bacterial infections in Canada were resistant to first-line treatments, with resistant infections being responsible for over 14,000 deaths, 5400 of which were directly attributable to antimicrobial resistance [9]. Capturing data on antibiotic-related adverse drug events observed in clinical practice is important to understand the real-world clinical benefits and harms of antibiotics, and inform drug regulation, prescribing guidelines, and efforts to curb clinical harm and antibiotic resistance.
Administrative databases are readily available, inexpensive and can provide population-level health data on important health outcomes. In Canada, the Discharge Abstracts Database (DAD) captures hospital administrative data including up to 25 hospital diagnoses [10]. In the past, we produced a list of ICD-10 codes to identify ADE-related emergency department visits [11] and evaluated the code set for its completeness in identifying a broad range of ADEs [12]. In this work, we aim to identify a list of ICD-10 codes to identify ADEs specifically related to outpatient antibiotic dispensations that are severe enough to require hospitalization.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identifying Potential Antibiotic-Associated Adverse Drug Events

We focused on adverse drug events (harm caused by appropriate or inappropriate use of a drug) as opposed to adverse drug reactions (harm caused by a drug under appropriate use) as empiric use of antibiotics is common practice and therefore assessing appropriateness is often not possible based on a lack of laboratory data. We identified potential antibiotic-associated ADEs by linking British Columbian administrative hospitalization (DAD) data with provincial medication dispensing data (PharmaNet) from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2020 [13,14]. We started by identifying all hospital healthcare encounters coded with an ADE-related ICD-10 diagnostic code with the same first three digits as those identified by Hohl et al. in a systematic review of the literature [11,12,15].
We excluded ADE-related diagnostic codes describing events that occurred during a patient’s hospital stay (i.e., diagnosis type 2 codes—“post-admit comorbidity—conditions that arise following admission and satisfy the requirements for determining comorbidity”) [16]. We then excluded all healthcare encounters that were not preceded with one or more outpatient antibiotic dispensations within 30 days of the healthcare encounter. Analyses were performed using R Studio 2023.12.0.
This restricted code set was then assessed by two independent reviewers for the likelihood of the ADE being antibiotic-associated. A physician with expertise in infectious diseases and microbiology (JG) and a clinical pharmacist (FM), both with extensive clinical experience practicing in British Columbia, independently rated the certainty by which any antibiotic could be responsible for the ICD-10 diagnosis coded in a subsequent hospital visit. Reviewers considered ADEs that could be directly (i.e., toxicity or drug interaction) or indirectly attributed to the use of antibiotics (i.e., dysbiosis or drug interaction). Reviewers used the Hohl et al. coding system (Table 1) [11]. Any discrepancy in the assigned causality rating for each ICD-10 code was discussed between the two reviewers, and a third clinical reviewer (CMH) where necessary, until consensus was reached.

2.2. Rating Inter-Rater Reliability

We calculated a raw and a weighted Cohen’s Kappa statistic to determine inter-rater reliability of the two reviewers’ initial ratings prior to reaching consensus. Causality codes were categorized into Likely (A, B, or C), Possible (D or E), and Unlikely (U or V). “Categorical agreement” was defined as agreement across the Likely, Possible, and Unlikely categories and “essential agreement” was defined as agreement across the A1, A2, B1, B2, C, D, E, U, and V categories. To calculate the weighted Kappa statistic, a linear weighting matrix was used to weigh differences between Likely and Unlikely more heavily than differences between Likely and Possible. Both raw and weighted Kappa statistics were calculated based on categorical agreement.

3. Results

Among the original list of 827 ICD-10 codes used in the literature for identifying ADEs, 695 different ADE-related codes were identified by linking provincial administrative hospital admission data with 30-day antibiotic dispensation data. There were 99 essential discrepancies (14.2%) and 97 categorical discrepancies (14.0%) between the two raters prior to reaching consensus. The unweighted categorical agreement between the two reviewers was “weak” (k = 0.54, 95% CI 0.45–0.62), but the weighted categorical agreement was “moderate” (k = 0.60, 95% CI 0.52–0.68) [17]. After facilitated discussion and an additional round of review, complete consensus on the code list was reached.
We identified 72 ICD-10 codes (10.4%) that “Likely” identified antibiotic-associated ADEs (categories A1, A2, and B1 and B2 and C) (Table 1). Another 68 ICD-10 codes (9.8%) that “Possibly” identified potential antibiotic-associated ADEs (categories E and D). The remaining 555 ICD-10 codes (79.9%) were deemed “Unlikely” to characterize an antibiotic-associated ADE (categories U and V). Some illustrative examples of “Unlikely” diagnostic categories included, but were not limited to, gastrointestinal ulcers (K25–K28), mental or behavioral disorders due to specified drugs (F11–F19), or external cause of morbidity codes specifying non-antibiotic drugs (Y41–Y88).
The “Likely” and “Possible” ICD-10 codes themselves can be found in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively.

4. Discussion

Our objective was to identify an ICD-10 code set among patients admitted to hospital for an ADE related to antibiotic use within the prior 30 days. Two expert reviewers adapted a previously published causal ranking system to identify the likelihood that an ADE was associated with antibiotic use. To our knowledge, this is the first study to develop an ICD-10 code set that can be applied to administrative healthcare records to identify the incidence of antibiotic-associated ADEs. These codes can be used to investigate the incidence of recognized antibiotic-associated ADEs and to better understand the antibiotic classes posing the greatest risk of subsequent antibiotic-associated ADE-related hospital admission.
In Canada, discharge diagnoses are coded retrospectively by administrative coding specialists from patient charts and the number of discharge diagnoses coded per visit varies by province [18,19]. The way these fields are coded varies by province and country such that our results may not be generalizable outside of British Columbia. Future studies should apply the antibiotic ADE diagnostic codes identified in this work to their own administrative data to refine and validate them in other health systems. Also, while administrative data generated by acute care encounters with the healthcare system have been impactful in understanding how medications are used in the real-world setting and in generating safety signals, few confirmed ADEs are documented within them. This was demonstrated by Wickham et al. when comparing ADEs identified in administrative data with confirmed ADEs identified prospectively by care teams in three prospective cohort studies in BC (although hospital data performed the best out of the administrative datasets investigated) [12]. Thus, while our intent was to identify antibiotic-related ADEs using ICD-10 codes, these codes can only identify ADEs caused by antibiotics that were recognized and documented by the care team [20]. Ideally, they should be validated in future studies against prospectively identified and confirmed antibiotic-related ADEs. Additionally, as the diagnostic code set comprises ICD-10 codes used in hospitals, they may not capture the ADEs that patients might present with at community-based clinics (where ICD-9 codes are used). However, the code set outlined in this paper will capture the most severe and costly ADEs that patients seek care for following antibiotic use.
Future research should validate this code set by applying it to identify antibiotic-associated ADEs in records, which is currently underway in BC. This paper provides important methodological guidance on how a code set may be generated, based on real-world coded data. Our work can also be used as a starting point to develop an explicit code set for community-based ADEs, and to identify and track hospital admissions for antibiotic-related ADEs. This will allow us to identify geographic variation and time trends as new antibiotics are licensed, and prescribing guidelines vary. While, undoubtedly, the proposed code set will require iteration, it provides a starting point for improved surveillance to identify, quantify, and compare antibiotic-associated harms.

5. Conclusions

We used community medication dispensing data linked with subsequent hospitalization data, along with clinical review and iterative consultation, to adapt a previously published list of antibiotic-associated ADE diagnostic codes. The list shared in this work may help identify antibiotic-associated adverse drug events in hospital inpatient records in administrative data, improving the ability to capture this important outcome when assessing the benefits and risks of antibiotic administration in patient populations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M.H. and D.M.P.; methodology, H.L., A.C., E.C., F.M. and J.G.; formal analysis, E.C., H.L., C.Z. and A.C.; investigation (code causality rating), F.M. and J.G.; data curation, E.C. and C.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, H.L., A.C. and C.M.H.; writing—review and editing, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the British Columbia Ministry of Health—Clinical Services & Evaluation—Pharmaceutical, Laboratory and Blood Services Division (Victoria, BC, Canada), funding letter 125386.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the UBC Clinical Research Ethics Board (H09-00650). The wider study that this work is part of is being conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation is not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data analyzed in this study are subject to the following licenses restrictions: access to data provided by the Data Stewards is subject to approval but can be requested for research projects through the Data Stewards or their designated service providers. The following datasets were used in this study: Pharmanet and Discharge Abstracts Database. All inferences, opinions, and conclusions drawn in this publication are those of the author(s), and do not reflect the opinions or policies of the Data Steward(s).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ADEAdverse drug event
ICD-10International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision.
NACRSNational Ambulatory Care Reporting System
DADDischarge Abstracts Database

References

  1. Tamma, P.D.; Avdic, E.; Li, D.X.; Dzintars, K.; Cosgrove, S.E. Association of Adverse Events with Antibiotic Use in Hospitalized Patients. JAMA Intern. Med. 2017, 177, 1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Beck, J.N.; Suppes, S.L.; Smith, C.R.; Lee, B.R.; Leeder, J.S.; VanDoren, M.; Newland, J.G.; Goldman, J.L. Cost and Potential Avoidability of Antibiotic-Associated Adverse Drug Reactions in Children. J. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. Soc. 2019, 8, 66–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hohl, C.M.; Badke, K.; Zhao, A.; Wickham, M.E.; Woo, S.A.; Sivilotti, M.L.; Perry, J.J. Prospective Validation of Clinical Criteria to Identify Emergency Department Patients at High Risk for Adverse Drug Events. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2018, 25, 1015–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Geller, A.I.; Lovegrove, M.C.; Shehab, N.; Hicks, L.A.; Sapiano, M.R.; Budnitz, D.S. National Estimates of Emergency Department Visits for Antibiotic Adverse Events Among Adults—United States, 2011–2015. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2018, 33, 1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zed, P.J.; Abu-Laban, R.B.; Balen, R.M.; Loewen, P.S.; Hohl, C.M.; Brubacher, J.R.; Wilbur, K.; Wiens, M.O.; Samoy, L.J.; Lacaria, K.; et al. Incidence, severity and preventability of medication-related visits to the emergency department: A prospective study. CMAJ 2008, 178, 1563–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. NACRS Emergency Department Visits and Lengths of Stay|CIHI. Available online: https://www.cihi.ca/en/nacrs-emergency-department-visits-and-lengths-of-stay (accessed on 7 September 2023).
  7. Wu, C.; Bell, C.M.; Wodchis, W.P. Incidence and Economic Burden of Adverse Drug Reactions among Elderly Patients in Ontario Emergency Departments. Drug Saf. 2012, 35, 769–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Inflation Calculator. Available online: https://www.bankofcanada.ca/rates/related/inflation-calculator/ (accessed on 26 October 2023).
  9. Overcoming Resistance: The Expert Panel on Antimicrobial Availability|Council of Canadian Academies. 2023. Available online: https://www.cca-reports.ca/reports/pull-incentives-for-high-value-antimicrobials/ (accessed on 26 November 2024).
  10. Canadian Institute of Health Information [creator] (2024): Discharge Abstract Database (Hospital Separations). British Columbia Ministry of Health [publisher]. Data Extract. MOH (2024).
  11. Hohl, C.M.; Karpov, A.; Reddekopp, L.; Stausberg, J. ICD-10 codes used to identify adverse drug events in administrative data: A systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2014, 21, 547–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wickham, M.E.; McGrail, K.M.; Law, M.R.; Cragg, A.; Hohl, C.M. Validating use of diagnostic codes in Canadian administrative data for identification of adverse drug events. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2024, 90, 1688–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) Metadata. Available online: https://www.cihi.ca/en/discharge-abstract-database-dad-metadata (accessed on 11 December 2024).
  14. BC Ministry of Health [creator] (2024): PharmaNet. BC Ministry of Health [publisher]. Data Extract. MOH (2024).
  15. Hohl, C.M.; Kuramoto, L.; Yu, E.; Rogula, B.; Stausberg, J.; Sobolev, B. Evaluating adverse drug event reporting in administrative data from emergency departments: A validation study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2013, 13, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Indicator Library—Diagnosis Type Definitions. Available online: https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/diagnosis-type-definitions-en.pdf (accessed on 11 December 2024).
  17. McHugh, M.L. Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem. Med. 2012, 22, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Coding & Informatics Services. Available online: http://www.himconnect.ca/meet-him/services/coding-informatics-services (accessed on 23 May 2023).
  19. Walker, R.L.; Hennessy, D.A.; Johansen, H.; Sambell, C.; Lix, L.; Quan, H. Implementation of ICD-10 in Canada: How has it impacted coded hospital discharge data? BMC Health Serv. Res. 2012, 12, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hohl, C.M.; Zed, P.J.; Brubacher, J.R.; Abu-Laban, R.B.; Loewen, P.S.; Purssell, R.A. Do Emergency Physicians Attribute Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits to Medication-Related Problems? Ann. Emerg. Med. 2010, 55, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. ADE ICD-10 causality code definitions applied to 695 unique ICD-10 codes entered for patients dispensed antibiotics in the 30 days prior to their hospital visit.
Table 1. ADE ICD-10 causality code definitions applied to 695 unique ICD-10 codes entered for patients dispensed antibiotics in the 30 days prior to their hospital visit.
Causality CodeDefinitionICD-10 Codes (n = 695)
n (%)
Likely
A1The ICD-10 code description includes the phrase “induced by antimicrobial medication/drug”24 (3.5)
A2The ICD-10 code description includes the phrase “induced by antimicrobial medication or other causes”2 (0.3)
B1The ICD-10 code description includes the phrase “poisoning by antimicrobial medication”0
B2The ICD-10 code description includes the phrase “poisoning by or harmful use of antimicrobial medication or other causes”0
CAdverse drug event associated with antimicrobial deemed to be very likely although the ICD-10 code description does not refer to a drug46 (6.6)
Possible
DAdverse drug event associated with antimicrobial deemed to be likely although the ICD-10 code description does not refer to a drug34 (4.9)
EAdverse drug event associated with antimicrobial deemed to be possible although the ICD-10 code dictionary does not refer to a drug34 (4.9)
Unlikely
UAdverse drug event associated with antimicrobial deemed unlikely555 (79.9)
VVaccine-associated adverse event associated with antimicrobial 0
Table 2. Antibiotic-associated ICD-10 codes, categorized into “Likely”.
Table 2. Antibiotic-associated ICD-10 codes, categorized into “Likely”.
Consensus ScoreICD-10 CodeDescription
A1Y40.0Penicillins
A1Y40.1Cefalosporins and other beta-lactam antibiotics
A1Y40.2Chloramphenicol group
A1Y40.3Macrolides
A1Y40.4Tetracyclines
A1Y40.5Aminoglycosides
A1Y40.6Rifamycins
A1Y40.8Other systemic antibiotics
A1Y40.9Systemic antibiotic, unspecified
A1Y41.0Sulfonamides
A1Y41.1Antimycobacterial drugs
A1Y46.1Oxazolidinediones
A1T36.0Penicillins
A1T36.1Cefalosporins and other beta-lactam antibiotics
A1T36.3Macrolides
A1T36.4Tetracyclines
A1T36.5Aminoglycosides
A1T36.8Other systemic antibiotics
A1T36.9Systemic antibiotic, unspecified
A1T37.0Sulfonamides
A1T37.1Antimycobacterial drugs
A1T42.2Succinimides and oxazolidinediones
A1Z88.0Allergy status to penicillin
A1Z88.2Allergy status to sulfonamides
A2Z88.1Allergy status to other antibiotic agents
A2Z88.3Allergy status to other anti-infective agents
CD52.1Drug-induced folate deficiency anemia
CD61.1Drug-induced aplastic anemia due to chemotherapy
CE16.0Drug-induced hypoglycemia without coma
CG72.0Drug-induced myopathy
CJ70.2Acute drug-induced interstitial lung disorders
CJ70.3Chronic drug-induced interstitial lung disorders
CJ70.4Drug-induced interstitial lung disorders, unspecified
CK85.3Drug-induced pancreatitis
CL56.0Drug phototoxic response
CL56.1Drug photoallergic response
CR50.2Drug-induced fever
CL27.0Generalized skin eruption due to drugs and medicaments
CL27.1Localized skin eruption due to drugs and medicaments
CL27.8Dermatitis due to other substances taken internally
CL27.9Dermatitis due to unspecified substance taken internally
CT78.2Anaphylactic shock, unspecified
CT78.3Angioneurotic edema
CT78.4Allergy, unspecified
CT78.9Adverse effect, unspecified
CT88.6Anaphylactic shock due to adverse effect of correct drug or medicament properly administered
CT88.7Unspecified adverse event due to drug or medicament
CA04.7Enterocolitis due to Clostridium difficile
CH91.0Ototoxic hearing loss
CK71.0Toxic liver disease with cholestasis
CK71.6Toxic liver disease with hepatitis, not elsewhere classified
CL51.2Toxic epidermal necrolysis [Lyell]
CL51.8Other erythema multiforme
CL51.9Erythema multiforme, unspecified
CD69.5Secondary thrombocytopenia
CD69.6Thrombocytopenia, unspecified
CL50.0Allergic urticaria
CN17.0Acute renal failure with tubular necrosis
CN17.1Acute renal failure with acute cortical necrosis
CN17.2Acute renal failure with medullary necrosis
CN17.8Other acute renal failure
CN17.9Acute renal failure, unspecified
CN19Unspecified renal failure
CD61.9Aplastic anemia, unspecified
CE87.5Hyperkalemia
CE87.6Hypokalemia
CI44.0Atrioventricular block, first degree
CI44.1Atrioventricular block, second degree
CR21Rash and other nonspecific skin eruption
CR51Headache
CR55Syncope and collapse
CR74.0Elevation of levels of transaminase and lactic acid dehydrogenase [LDH]
Table 3. Antibiotic-associated ICD-10 codes, categorized into “Possible”.
Table 3. Antibiotic-associated ICD-10 codes, categorized into “Possible”.
Consensus ScoreICD-10 CodeDescription
DG62.0Drug-induced polyneuropathy
DL23.3Allergic contact dermatitis due to drugs in contact with skin (TOPICAL ANTIBIOTICS)
DL24.4Irritant contact dermatitis due to drugs in contact with skin
DL25.1Unspecified contact dermatitis due to drugs in contact with skin
DN14.1Nephropathy induced by other drugs, medicaments, and biological substances
DN14.2Nephropathy induced by unspecified drug, medicament, or biological substance
DE15Nondiabetic hypoglycemic coma
DK52.1Toxic gastroenteritis and colitis
DK71.1Toxic liver disease with hepatic necrosis
DK71.2Toxic liver disease with acute hepatitis
DK71.8Toxic liver disease with other disorders of liver
DK71.9Toxic liver disease, unspecified
DL56.2Photocontact dermatitis [berloque dermatitis]
DH53.1Subjective visual disturbances
DH53.5Color vision deficiencies
DH53.8Other visual disturbances
DH53.9Visual disturbance, unspecified
DL29.0Pruritus ani
DL29.1Pruritus scroti
DL29.2Pruritus vulvae
DL29.3Anogenital pruritus, unspecified
DL29.8Other pruritus
DL29.9Pruritus, unspecified
DD69.0Allergic purpura
DD69.2Other nonthrombocytopenic purpura
DI80.8Phlebitis and thrombophlebitis of other sites
DI80.9Phlebitis and thrombophlebitis of unspecified site
DK72.0Acute and subacute hepatic failure
DK72.9Hepatic failure, unspecified
DM31.0Hypersensitivity angiitis
DR06.0Dyspnea
DR17Unspecified jaundice
DR34Anuria and oliguria
DR44.1Visual hallucinations
EE06.4Drug-induced thyroiditis
EG44.4Drug-induced headache, not elsewhere classified
EI95.2Hypotension due to drugs
EM32.0Drug-induced systemic lupus erythematosus
ED64.2Secondary sideroblastic anemia due to drugs and toxins
EE03.2Hypothyroidism due to medicaments and other exogenous substances
EI42.7Cardiomyopathy due to drugs and other external agents
EN14.4Toxic nephropathy, not elsewhere classified
ET78.8Other adverse effects, not elsewhere classified
EY57.9Drug or medicament, unspecified
EK71.3Toxic liver disease with chronic persistent hepatitis
EK71.7Toxic liver disease with fibrosis and cirrhosis of liver
EL51.0Nonbullous erythema multiforme
EL51.1Bullous erythema multiforme
ED69.8Other specified hemorrhagic conditions
ED69.9Hemorrhagic condition, unspecified
EE87.1Hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia
EE87.2Acidosis
EE87.3Alkalosis
EE87.4Mixed disorder of acid–base balance
EE87.7Fluid overload
EE87.8Other disorders of electrolyte and fluid balance, not elsewhere classified
EI44.2Atrioventricular block, complete
EI46.1Sudden cardiac death, so described
EI47.2Ventricular tachycardia
EI95.1Orthostatic hypotension
EI95.8Other hypotension
EI95.9Hypotension, unspecified
EK76.7Hepatorenal syndrome
EL26Exfoliative dermatitis
ER20.2Paresthesia of skin
ER20.3Hyperesthesia
ER20.8Other disturbances of skin sensation
ER58Hemorrhage, not elsewhere classified
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lishman, H.; Cragg, A.; Chuang, E.; Zou, C.; Marra, F.; Grant, J.; Patrick, D.M.; Hohl, C.M. ICD-10 Codes to Identify Adverse Drug Events Associated with Antibiotics in Administrative Data. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14030314

AMA Style

Lishman H, Cragg A, Chuang E, Zou C, Marra F, Grant J, Patrick DM, Hohl CM. ICD-10 Codes to Identify Adverse Drug Events Associated with Antibiotics in Administrative Data. Antibiotics. 2025; 14(3):314. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14030314

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lishman, Hannah, Amber Cragg, Erica Chuang, Carl Zou, Fawziah Marra, Jennifer Grant, David M. Patrick, and Corinne M. Hohl. 2025. "ICD-10 Codes to Identify Adverse Drug Events Associated with Antibiotics in Administrative Data" Antibiotics 14, no. 3: 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14030314

APA Style

Lishman, H., Cragg, A., Chuang, E., Zou, C., Marra, F., Grant, J., Patrick, D. M., & Hohl, C. M. (2025). ICD-10 Codes to Identify Adverse Drug Events Associated with Antibiotics in Administrative Data. Antibiotics, 14(3), 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14030314

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop